Allstocks.com's Bulletin Board
Topic Closed  Topic Closed
Post New Topic  New Poll  
Topic Closed  Topic Closed
my profile login | register | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Allstocks.com's Bulletin Board » Micro Penny Stocks, Penny Stocks $0.10 & Under » CMKX ... VI ... The Saga Continues (Page 18)

 - UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!   This topic comprises 75 pages: 1  2  3  ...  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  ...  73  74  75   
Author Topic: CMKX ... VI ... The Saga Continues
tradingpennys
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for tradingpennys     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Originally posted by bill1352:
i'm still guessing no news till after the gemm shares are paid except maybe a pr stating they took the option on the rest of the gemm shares. i'm wondering and i have looked but no legal answer found yet...can cmkx change the shares given on CIM without a pr stating so. i don't think a pr is legally binding. as there is no otc bb post on gemm as yet and if things follow suit it will work out to a third o/s. and since the pay date is 3 weeks give or take an explaination of the differance might be nice. since cmkx doesn't seem to have any plans of telling us it might help if we knew if they can change the amount without telling anyone. 20 billion shares fits all the info we do know for sure. the a/s of 800 billion and a few shares differance for 11 trading days. that is if each shares owned has been counted for each x-date. any facts found either way would be welcome.

"can cmkx change the shares given on CIM without a pr stating so. i don't think a pr is legally binding. "

I would think they can change the shares without a PR. As long as they were NOT specific in detail (of which they never are) Otherwise I futher think that if they did give exact detail and changed it without our knowledge that it would be some sort of fraud. Kind of like "Bait and Switch".


Posts: 415 | From: CA | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
bill1352
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for bill1352     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
well at least ucad is doing something...

U.S. Canadian Minerals Inc. Receives $3,000,000 of Funding
September 08, 2004 05:30:00 AM ET


U.S. Canadian Minerals Inc. UCAD announced today that it has received $3,000,000 of funding via a private placement.

Rendal Williams, CEO of UCAD, stated, "This funding will allow the company to move forward on several fronts in the execution of its current plans and future development of the company's financial growth as dictated by the board of directors."

A U.S. Canadian Minerals Inc. executive team, with other strategic partners, will arrive in South America this week to explore the development of several key acquisition possibilities that have been targeted on previous trips. Williams further stated, "Many of the due diligence packages are nearing completion, revealing incredible potential results, which demands an additional research trip to conclude the feasibility of Level 1 priority for expanded operations inside South America."


Posts: 3651 | From: Algonac, MI. 48001 | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
bill1352
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for bill1352     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
tradingpennies....they did give a number of shares and they gave an x-date sort of. all owners as of 7/19/04...it would be like GM releasing a pr saying everyone gets $2 and then sending $1 without saying so beforehand...it would be unethical but is it legal...the DTC count for CIM & UCAD dividends should be close not double. cutting CIM in half gives you numbers that are close. and how would the shareholders know, we can't count the shares given out any more then we can count the o/s. if UC takes CIM public he would have to start with 80 billion to keep 50% cutting the dividend in half cuts the starting a/s & o/s in 1/2 also. which in the long run isn't all that bad, if it ever goes public
Posts: 3651 | From: Algonac, MI. 48001 | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
dwman
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for dwman     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
St. George opened at .45 and already to .60
Posts: 1005 | From: Grapevine, TX 76051 | Registered: Aug 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
thinkmoney
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for thinkmoney     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
wow! sggm is .55. What is up? And I have no clue why their 5% venture with us is increasing sggm pps but NADA to cmkx.

Someone is making money but its not me or CMKX at this point.


Posts: 864 | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
dwman
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for dwman     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Now at .70 on 77 thousand plus vol
Posts: 1005 | From: Grapevine, TX 76051 | Registered: Aug 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
dwman
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for dwman     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
back to .55.... Wow!! Will cmkx be that volatile?
Posts: 1005 | From: Grapevine, TX 76051 | Registered: Aug 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
legal1082
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for legal1082     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I just got a call and my friend said that sggm is at .70!!!! WOW! I wish I had got some of that
Posts: 784 | From: washington, DC | Registered: Aug 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
noahltl
New Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for noahltl     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
This info just came across PalTalk - Bill Giebelhaus of SGGM is President of Clark Builders in Yellowknife. That company received the contract to build the Ekati mine.
Posts: 2 | From: Noblesville, IN | Registered: Oct 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Meatcliff_buxtable
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Meatcliff_buxtable     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Originally posted by noahltl:
This info just came across PalTalk - Bill Giebelhaus of SGGM is President of Clark Builders in Yellowknife. That company received the contract to build the Ekati mine.

Excuse my ignorance but what is the "Ekati" Mine and who owns it?

Thanks

------------------
If heaven had a height .... You would be that tall.


Posts: 7 | From: Jersey city, Nj , US | Registered: Jul 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
dwman
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for dwman     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Forgive me if this has already been posted and forgive the length.

CONFIRMING DR. D's NUMBERS!


CMKX to quickly become a major player...

The post below backs up Dr.D's post (and the numbers used).


Dr. D's post is at:

"$1.94 Trillion dollars profit after cost (CMKX HALL OF FAME) http://cmkx.********s35.com/index.cgi?board=greatposts&action=display&num=1092188295&start=0

Posted by: Bo14172
In reply to: None Date:8/7/2004 4:45:32 PM
Post #of 7950

Confirming Dr. D's post:

Pefect Storms, Arks, Mt Saint Helens...etc, etc, etc.
Tons, carats, grams, calcualtions, figures...
From Sterling's no O/S post to now his mega O/S post. Zen and Dr.D have people going into withdrawls if a daily post isn't logged. Tales and bedtime stories seem to calm the masses, which I guess helps keep the base. Whatever floats your boat I guess..lol

However, the only way slow sustained longterm support is keeping it real during good times and bad. Early last week had many silenced and no where to be found after a certain pr was released. Putting in focus wasn't a problem for me during that time.

Keeping it constructive to the issues at hand, with fresh DD on the market and the industry, along with perspective from 20+ years in business, law and investing is what I try to bring in order to "keep our feet on the ground while reaching for the stars".

I'm sure as many doubted the figures in Dr.D's recent post, as accepted his premise blindly. Those who doubted his figures
questioned the 2 most fundemental point of his post:

1) 0.5 carat/ton of kimberlite.

2) 1/2 mile diameter pipe will contain 1 billion tons of
kimberlite.

Here's why his post is both accurate and conservative in his projections.

In looking at the history of BHP, who were the pioneers in Canadian Diamond Exploration, we find this (I'll post the link, then an excerpt from the text):

Link: http://ekati.bhpbilliton.com/news/28051998.asp

Excerpt from the text:

"Pipe Kimberlite Metres Drilled Est. Dry Tonnes Kimberlite Sampled Total Carats Recovered >1mm Sample Grade Carats/Tonne
Koala North 1075 201.7 126.58 0.63
Beartooth 1020 189.3 227.09 1.20

Commercial valuation of these samples was made in Antwerp in May. The average sample value of Koala North was $200 US per carat. Approximately 77 per cent of the value is due to three gem quality stones ranging in size from 3.26 to 5.41 carats. The average sample value for the Beartooth pipe was $79 US per carat. These figures are 10 per cent less than the average prices reported by dealers and valuers, which has been the joint venture's customary reporting practice when values are based on dealer sales prices.

Both of these pipes are relatively small, however, they are close to the mining area currently under development. The Koala North pipe is located within Koala Lake and has a surface area of approximately 0.6 hectares. The Beartooth kimberlite is situated 900 metres north of the Panda pipe and has a surface area of approximately 1.0 hectare. Reserve modeling is in progress on both pipes."
_________________________________________________________________

I apologize I couldn't copy the graph as it is illustrated in their site, but the key numbers I want you to focus on are easily seen.
Look at the Carats/Tonne figures for both sites: .63/tonne and 1.20/tonne. Why are these figures important?

1) Note what BHP states about these sites. They state both of
these pipes are "reletively small". Thus...

2) Dr. D's .5 carats/tonne is not only an accurate figure to
base his valuation model, it is indeed a conservative number!


Need further proof on the 1 billion tonnes of kimberlite?

Let's roll the clock ahead to what is happening in the area. Here is a quote from Shore Gold's site regarding the Star Diamond Project:

"The geophysical signature and early stage drilling have indicated a kimberlite body in the 500 million tonne range. Shore is currently undertaking a 25,000 tonne bulk sample to better determine carat values." http://www.shoregold.com/sdp.html
_________________________________________________________________

500 million tons in the Star Project alone. And how many claims and acres do we own or control? : )

Currently Shore is using a 14.5 meter diameter exploration shaft in their BULK MINING efforts. We are now drilling VERY close to the Star Project.

Let's now look at our other neighbor, Debeers/Kensington #122:
http://www.kensington-resources.com/s/Property.asp

* They estimate 9 billion tons of Kimberlite in their claims.

* Diamond recovery from Kimberlite 122 also was very positive
with stone abun****** for the north and south part of the body
ranging from 2 to 7 times higher than historical results. A
total of 327 stones were recovered from 412.65 kg of
kimberlite including 6 macrodiamonds greater than 0.5 mm.
_________________________________________________________________

So, if there is 9 billion tons of kimberlite over the small acreage they own or control, I think it is safe to say we have at least that tonnage in over 100 anomalies and almost 2 million acres of claims!

Finally, note in BHP's information, Shore Gold's information, and
Debeer's/Kensington's information...ALL INVOLVE BULK SAMPLES!

Our test drilling will tell us if we can proceed to BULK SAMPLE STAGE. We are all 100% sure our future is very bright. But to believe we are going to pull out diamonds the size of river rocks during a small bore test drilling, is setting us up for what occured at Carolyn. However, what is exciting is the location of our new site in relation to Debeers and Shore Gold, and it is the first of many sites being explored from the guidance of the Goldak survey. This survey my friends is the key to our valuation at this point as much as our current drilling efforts. Both the survey and our finds offer many opportunties for CMKX to quickly become a major player in this area.

So in this case, read Dr.D's post knowing the base figures in his analysis are indeed conservative. Be well, Bo
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=3755635

Logged

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Posts: 1005 | From: Grapevine, TX 76051 | Registered: Aug 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
noahltl
New Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for noahltl     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Meatlciff:


The year was 1985. On a frozen plateau in the Lac de Gras area deep in the icy Canadian north, geologist Chuck Fipke found diamond indicator minerals. The hunt was on. His story and that of his prospecting partner, Stewart Blusson, led to the discovery of Canada's first diamond mine. EKATI.

Many scoffed at the idea that diamonds existed in this frozen, seemingly barren landscape. It took imagination, vision and dogged determination to continue the quest. The odds were long. The resources short.

The details involve vast territory, huge distances, brutal winters and one of the most sensitive ecological environments on the planet. In scientific terms it involved the challenge of discriminating between the hidden kimberlite pipes that bore diamonds and those that didn't. This was unknown territory in every sense of the word.

No one believed that any important diamond deposits would be found in Canada. And if they were, people felt that getting them up from this frozen ground would prove another impossibility.

The trail of kimberlitic minerals pointed to sources near Lac de Gras, about 300 km from Yellowknife. That's where Fipke and his crew staked their first claims.

Dia Met along with BHP, a world leader in mining and together owners of the EKATI Diamond Mine™, sent a group of geologists and geophysicists to conduct ultra sensitive surveys. These would lead to the ultimate discovery, its impact felt throughout the world.


A core hole was drilled right under the lake. 400 feet of barren wallrock later the hole penetrated the first kimberlite pipe. The 59 kilograms of core from the hole was found to contain 65 microdiamonds and 16 macrodiamonds.

Several years of intensive exploration led to the discovery of dozens of new kimberlite pipes on the property including the Panda pipe. Not only did the Panda pipe contain high grades of diamonds, it contained remarkable diamonds, characterized by beautiful, exceptionally white stones.

After 15 years of determination, teamwork and talent, Canada's first and only diamond producing mine is now a reality.

Every AURIAS diamond carries this legacy of passion, strength and unwavering optimism.




[This message has been edited by noahltl (edited September 08, 2004).]


Posts: 2 | From: Noblesville, IN | Registered: Oct 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Meatcliff_buxtable
Member


Rate Member
Icon 11 posted      Profile for Meatcliff_buxtable     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Originally posted by noahltl:
Meatlciff:


The year was 1985. On a frozen plateau in the Lac de Gras area deep in the icy Canadian north, geologist Chuck Fipke found diamond indicator minerals. The hunt was on. His story and that of his prospecting partner, Stewart Blusson, led to the discovery of Canada's first diamond mine. EKATI.

Many scoffed at the idea that diamonds existed in this frozen, seemingly barren landscape. It took imagination, vision and dogged determination to continue the quest. The odds were long. The resources short.

The details involve vast territory, huge distances, brutal winters and one of the most sensitive ecological environments on the planet. In scientific terms it involved the challenge of discriminating between the hidden kimberlite pipes that bore diamonds and those that didn't. This was unknown territory in every sense of the word.

No one believed that any important diamond deposits would be found in Canada. And if they were, people felt that getting them up from this frozen ground would prove another impossibility.

The trail of kimberlitic minerals pointed to sources near Lac de Gras, about 300 km from Yellowknife. That's where Fipke and his crew staked their first claims.

Dia Met along with BHP, a world leader in mining and together owners of the EKATI Diamond Mine™, sent a group of geologists and geophysicists to conduct ultra sensitive surveys. These would lead to the ultimate discovery, its impact felt throughout the world.


A core hole was drilled right under the lake. 400 feet of barren wallrock later the hole penetrated the first kimberlite pipe. The 59 kilograms of core from the hole was found to contain 65 microdiamonds and 16 macrodiamonds.

Several years of intensive exploration led to the discovery of dozens of new kimberlite pipes on the property including the Panda pipe. Not only did the Panda pipe contain high grades of diamonds, it contained remarkable diamonds, characterized by beautiful, exceptionally white stones.

After 15 years of determination, teamwork and talent, Canada's first and only diamond producing mine is now a reality.

Every AURIAS diamond carries this legacy of passion, strength and unwavering optimism.




[This message has been edited by noahltl (edited September 08, 2004).]


Thanks for the passionate recreation of the story.


Posts: 7 | From: Jersey city, Nj , US | Registered: Jul 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
noahltl
New Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for noahltl     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Meatcliff, does bring a tear to your eye doesn't it?? LOL
Posts: 2 | From: Noblesville, IN | Registered: Oct 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
tradingpennys
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for tradingpennys     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Originally posted by bill1352:
tradingpennies....they did give a number of shares and they gave an x-date sort of. all owners as of 7/19/04...it would be like GM releasing a pr saying everyone gets $2 and then sending $1 without saying so beforehand...it would be unethical but is it legal...the DTC count for CIM & UCAD dividends should be close not double. cutting CIM in half gives you numbers that are close. and how would the shareholders know, we can't count the shares given out any more then we can count the o/s. if UC takes CIM public he would have to start with 80 billion to keep 50% cutting the dividend in half cuts the starting a/s & o/s in 1/2 also. which in the long run isn't all that bad, if it ever goes public

LOL Seems you knew the answer! Hmm ... now you have me wondering...


Posts: 415 | From: CA | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
bill1352
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for bill1352     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
tradingpennys
Member posted September 08, 2004 12:28


LOL Seems you knew the answer! Hmm ... now you have me wondering...

===========================================

wish i had any kind of answer...lol...the differance in the 2 o/s counts means either somebody thinks there are 800 billion naked shorted shares or after the increase to 800 billion it was increased to 1.6 trillion. since you can't sell 800 billion shares of anything in the 11 days in between the 2 prs, not naked or real, those shares had to be there for the ucad dividend date. maybe the ucad count came from the shares cmkx got paid for and CIM comes from the shares the DTC put in broker account to then put in shareholder accounts or cmkx cut the dividend in half.


Posts: 3651 | From: Algonac, MI. 48001 | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
noahltl
New Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for noahltl     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Poster on PalTalk called SGGM offices and spoke to a Vicky Curran, the IR person. Vicky said SGGM lay dormant for about 12 years, but still had some of the same shareholders from then. Did not know about Blusson but would check on the name. She is new to the company. Said Mark Giebelhaus was the CEO. Did say that the current OS is 16,951,000.

SGGM active TX - 877 632 3133

[This message has been edited by noahltl (edited September 08, 2004).]


Posts: 2 | From: Noblesville, IN | Registered: Oct 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
noahltl
New Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for noahltl     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
2003 PR from SGGM. Note the intention for acquisition.


HEADLINES: Saint George Metals Announces Stock Dividend


Warrenton, VA, Apr 21, 2003 (financialnewsusa.com via COMTEX) -- Saint George Metals (OTC: SGGM) announced today the issuance of a 3% stock dividend to shareholders of record of Saint George Metals on Tuesday, April 29, 2003. The payable date shall be May 2, 2003.

The Company also announced that it is undergoing a restructuring with the end goal of allowing Saint George Metals to acquire an operating company during the 2003 year.

Safe Harbor Statement under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995: The statements, other than the statements of historical facts, contained in this release which are not historical facts may be deemed to contain forward-looking statements with respect to events, the occurrence of which involves risk and uncertainties, including, without limitation, demand and competition for the Company's products and services, the availability to the Company of adequate financing to support its anticipated activities, the ability of the Company to generate cash flow from operations and the ability of the Company to manage its operations.

CONTACT: For more information
Tel: 703-575-6307


Posts: 2 | From: Noblesville, IN | Registered: Oct 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
noahltl
New Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for noahltl     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
CT administrator at Christian Traders board will be speaking on CMKX at 5:30 eastern time at:

http://www.familyvaluesradio.com/index.html


Posts: 2 | From: Noblesville, IN | Registered: Oct 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
dwman
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for dwman     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I have a question. Let's just say that cmkx is going away by backing into the shell of St. George Metals... Does cmkx have to tender an offer for our shares or can they just issue the 200 billion shares of sggm? If they do that it would seem than net to us would probably be less than we would get with an offer of say $.50 per share of cmkx. Don
Posts: 1005 | From: Grapevine, TX 76051 | Registered: Aug 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
bill1352
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for bill1352     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
i can't see anything happening till they figure out the correct o/s. on the 18th last month they increase the a/s to 800 billion. owners of record on the 20th get ucad shares, a few weeks later the ucad split is close to 800 billion. just a hunch but i dont think they sold 300 billion shares in 2 days. a few weeks go by and the cim split says 1.6 trillion o/s. in a week or 2 the gemm split should be known and i'm guessing a third o/s will figure in. everything points to the goods being there, they may even have the mother load of all diamond mines but untill cmkx gets its corporate act together no company is going to merge. if naked shares exist they need to be covered
Posts: 3651 | From: Algonac, MI. 48001 | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
kevy0899
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for kevy0899     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
This was ETRADE's response.

I received your email reply today about the 9/17/04 CMKX dividend. They have not yet released the exact details of this dividend, so while 1 share for 1 share was originally listed, this is not guaranteed to be correct information. They may update this with exact numbers once the date of the dividend is closer.


quote:
Originally posted by kevy0899:
I just sent ETRADE a mail asking them to confirm or deny the 1/1 GEMM statement they made.. I will let you know the response.


[QUOTE]Originally posted by kevy0899:
[b]I have to admit... I was shocked too. But I am also new to this and didnt really know what to think. Thanks for the response.

[QUOTE]Originally posted by bill1352:
[b]kevy0899
Member posted September 07, 2004 15:08


[/B][/QUOTE][/B][/QUOTE]

Posts: 20 | Registered: Jul 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
bill1352
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for bill1352     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
dw...from reading that site about shell companies i think we get shares, normally 1 for 1 of a shell company but that shell is private. they then go public to a better board and dont have to answer up for past actions. the first company just sits and all its assetts go to the new company
Posts: 3651 | From: Algonac, MI. 48001 | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
bill1352
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for bill1352     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
thank ya kevy....sort of..lol. sure would be nice to have 2 million shares of a diamond company with a 222 million o/s...lol. our pps would be up around ucad numbers real fast.
Posts: 3651 | From: Algonac, MI. 48001 | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
dwman
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for dwman     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Thanks Bill.

[This message has been edited by dwman (edited September 08, 2004).]


Posts: 1005 | From: Grapevine, TX 76051 | Registered: Aug 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
bill1352
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for bill1352     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
well the green baron guy calling into christain traders thinks cmkx will be reporting in a few weeks. says roger is ucads lawyer also and that they are moving up in boards but they are waiting for cmkx to become reporting...interesting

Posts: 3651 | From: Algonac, MI. 48001 | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
tradingpennys
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for tradingpennys     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Originally posted by bill1352:
thank ya kevy....sort of..lol. sure would be nice to have 2 million shares of a diamond company with a 222 million o/s...lol. our pps would be up around ucad numbers real fast.

It would be even better if the diamond company was mining for diamonds! And the ultimate would be if they found diamonds!


Posts: 415 | From: CA | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
tradingpennys
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for tradingpennys     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
UPDATE: CMKM DIAMONDS, INC. (Pink Sheets: CMKX) - SWAPPING STUFF
September 7, 2004
Imagine it was spring again, and time to clean out all of the useless items you had accumulated over the past years - all of those beanie babies, trolls, and pet rocks that you have been collecting. But instead of tossing them in the trash, you swap them with your neighbor, who has an equally dubious set of stuff cluttering his closet.


Now imagine that you and your neighbor agree that you are not trading junk at all, but valuable items of infinite worth. Does that make the items valuable?


CMKM Diamonds, Inc. (Pink Sheets: CMKX) has been on a trading spree. The Company, which has yet to uncover marketable diamonds or other revenue generating gems and ores, has been busy trading interests in its claims with other financially challenged mining companies. UPDATE: CMKM DIAMONDS, INC. - CONCENTRIC CIRCLES. In its search for a silk purse - or is that a diamond studded handbag - on September 2, 2004, CMKM announced a joint venture agreement with another struggling Pink Sheet company, St. George Metals, Inc (Pink Sheets: SGGM).


According to the September 2nd press release, St. George Metals has agreed to purchase a 5% interest in all of CMKM's mineral claims. In return, CMKM says it expects to receive $10,000,000 Dollars and two hundred billion (200,000,000,000) restricted shares of St. George stock. CMKM claims that it already has received the first $2,500,000 payment and anticipates three additional $2,500,000 payments by October 2nd.


The terms of this transaction place a rather curious valuation upon the assets of both companies. Investors can only guess at the value of St. George - or the state of its operations. The Company ceased filing public reports with the SEC in November 2002. When it last filed, St. George declined to provide detailed financial information, instead conceding that its "financial resources" had been "substantially exhausted" and that it had no ongoing business operations.


We have discovered no public information that would suggest St. George's fortunes have improved these past two years. The Company has not issued any recent press releases indicating new funding or renewed operations. Consequently, there is no way to determine how the financially exhausted company may have accumulated $10 million - or why it would devote such valuable resources to acquiring an interest in CMKM.


Despite this lack of information, investors responded to the CMKM announcement, driving St. George stock from $.01 a share on September 2nd to $.07 a share on September 3rd - a 700% increase for a Company whose financial condition and business remain a complete mystery.


The transaction also created a valuation for CMKM that is hardly supported by the Company's track record. If St. George was prepared to pay $10 million in cash, and deliver stock valued at $2 billion on September 2nd (and $14 billion on September 3rd) for a measly 5% of CMKM's mining interests, did that mean CMKM's claims were worth roughly between $40 billion and $280 billion?


That hardly seems likely. Remember, CMKM has yet to dig up any marketable diamonds.


The St. George alliance followed several similar swaps between CMKM and obscure mining companies searching for the mother lode - albeit unsuccessfully, at least so far. In one of those transactions, CMKM announced that it would sell 5% of its mining claims to U.S. Canadian Minerals, Inc. (OTCBB: UCAD) in exchange for 7.5 million shares of U.S. Canadian stock. UPDATE: CMKM DIAMONDS, INC. - SHARING SHARES. That sounds like a bargain, considering the price paid by St. George for a similar interest. The price of U.S. Canadian shares at the time of that deal was approximately $4.80 a share - CMKM practically gave away the 5% interest for a mere $36 million worth of stock.


Then again, where are the diamonds?


And there was more. CMKM also gave U.S. Canadian a one year option to acquire an additional 10% of CMKM's mineral claims for $15 million in cash. On July 27, 2004, CMKM announced that it had received $3 million from U.S. Canadian, representing a partial exercise of the option.


On the surface it seemed unlikely that U.S. Canadian would be able to come up with the necessary funds. Unlike CMKM and St. George, U.S. Canadian does file periodic reports with the SEC - the price it must pay to preserve its listing on the OTC Bulletin Board. Those reports suggest that U.S. Canadian faces considerable financial challenges. As of March 31, 2004, U.S. Canadian had $408 in cash, no current revenues, and concerns about its ability to continue as a going concern.


Matters hardly improved in the third quarter of 2004. As of June 30, 2004, U.S. Canadian had $1,321 in cash, no revenues, and cumulative losses of $17.7 million. So where did U.S. Canadian get $3 million - and why would it invest those precious funds in CMKM?


The answer can be found in U.S. Canadian's Form 10-Q financial report for the quarter ended June 30, 2004. According to the Form 10-Q, U. S. Canadian agreed to sell 600,000 shares of its stock to an unnamed party related to CMKM at $5 a share. The $3,000,000 received by U.S. Canadian from that transaction was then paid to CMKM.


In other words, an individual related to CMKM funded U.S. Canadian's investment in CMKM - just one more swap in this series of intriguing transactions.


And what of the money paid to CMKM by St. George? Was it raised in a similar fashion, by funneling shares to a "party" associated with CMKM? Unfortunately, in the absence of public filings, investors will have a difficult time finding the answer to that question.


But regulators should be able to get those answers - if only they bother to ask.

©2004 Stock Patrol.com. All rights reserved.
http://www.stockpatrol.com/schlock/doghouse/u_cmkm5.html


Posts: 415 | From: CA | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
tradingpennys
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for tradingpennys     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Question:
1. I thought Christian Traders requested a interview with Urban some time ago. That never transpired.. did it?

2. I caught only the tale end of the radio show - Was there anyone that aired on there from CMKM?


Posts: 415 | From: CA | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Upside
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for Upside     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Anyone who has Paltalk should go there now! Melvin is singing in Sterlings classroom.
Posts: 5729 | From: Wisconsin | Registered: Sep 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Money_Penny
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Money_Penny     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
So he's making an ass out of himself again...what's new???
Posts: 430 | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
will
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for will     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The pet slob. The best of the weekend rumors was that they were going to can this slob. Shame they were only rumors, especially that one. Now for sure I know it was his progeny he had on his desk.


quote:
Originally posted by Upside:
Anyone who has Paltalk should go there now! Melvin is singing in Sterlings classroom.


Posts: 4893 | From: Burbank IL USA | Registered: Feb 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Wallace#1
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Wallace#1         Edit/Delete Post 
Man, is this thread dead!!! Where are all the fanatical protagonists? No fun at all.
Posts: 3607 | From: NJ - Outside Phila. | Registered: Mar 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
will
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for will     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
You beat them all up , Wallace. Besides, what else can be said? We're all waiting on the BIG PR !!

quote:
Originally posted by Wallace#1:
Man, is this thread dead!!! Where are all the fanatical protagonists? No fun at all.


Posts: 4893 | From: Burbank IL USA | Registered: Feb 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Wallace#1
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Wallace#1         Edit/Delete Post 
Will,

LOL...YOU beat Them up! How could everyone have missed that fantastic PR that came out on Tuesday? Didn't UC supposedly fly up to the mining site for something special? Isn't everyone happy with all their dividends? Didn't the Indy Race go well? Hasn't the price gone up to .0004 from .0003 so everyone made tons of money? Have dreams turned to nightmares? Hasn't there been a merger with CMKX? Did Glenn sink while walking on water? Where's all that hype, hope and faith?


Posts: 3607 | From: NJ - Outside Phila. | Registered: Mar 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
  This topic comprises 75 pages: 1  2  3  ...  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  ...  73  74  75   

Post New Topic  New Poll  
Topic Closed  Topic Closed
Open Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


Contact Us | Allstocks.com Message Board Home

© 1997 - 2021 Allstocks.com. All rights reserved.

Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.2

Share