Allstocks.com's Bulletin Board
Topic Closed  Topic Closed
Post New Topic  New Poll  
Topic Closed  Topic Closed
my profile login | register | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Allstocks.com's Bulletin Board » Micro Penny Stocks, Penny Stocks $0.10 & Under » CMKX ... VI ... The Saga Continues (Page 21)

 - UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!   This topic comprises 75 pages: 1  2  3  ...  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  ...  73  74  75   
Author Topic: CMKX ... VI ... The Saga Continues
will
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for will     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
"I have had that happen while
playing these pennies, so it wouldn't be the first time, Only it wasn't claims, but thier whole business given to a private company,
so I never put any pennie stock past the thought."

Pretty choppy sentence, but I can guess you all get his meaning. A possibility ???


Posts: 4893 | From: Burbank IL USA | Registered: Feb 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Money_Penny
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Money_Penny     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Noah, you have shown me again and again that DD does not have to be limited to the company and it's partners for this board to benefit from it. Thanks.
Posts: 430 | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
noahltl
New Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for noahltl     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Originally posted by Money_Penny:
Noah, you have shown me again and again that DD does not have to be limited to the company and it's partners for this board to benefit from it. Thanks.


Any time Money.


Posts: 2 | From: Noblesville, IN | Registered: Oct 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
will
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for will     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
So, no lesson to be learned from case's staged newbie act?
He was just a basher in gullible clothing?
Is the scnerio he posed a possibility? I noticed no one touched that one.

Posts: 4893 | From: Burbank IL USA | Registered: Feb 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Highwaychild
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for Highwaychild     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
LOL.I'll touch it...Time will tell.
Posts: 2634 | From: The highway | Registered: Feb 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
will
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for will     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The old "time" arguement. No cigar, child.

quote:
Originally posted by highwaychild:
LOL.I'll touch it...Time will tell.


Posts: 4893 | From: Burbank IL USA | Registered: Feb 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Highwaychild
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for Highwaychild     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Well, that's the one thing I got.LOL
Posts: 2634 | From: The highway | Registered: Feb 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Money_Penny
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Money_Penny     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
There are only two scenarios that will make me sell this stock...

1. PPS so high I can retire
2. More than 50% of our original claims belong to others


Posts: 430 | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
will
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for will     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
What percentage has been sold already? What percentage is still optioned?

quote:
Originally posted by Money_Penny:
There are only two scenarios that will make me sell this stock...

1. PPS so high I can retire
2. More than 50% of our original claims belong to others



Posts: 4893 | From: Burbank IL USA | Registered: Feb 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Highwaychild
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for Highwaychild     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I don't Think UCADs % counts.
Rendel Williams-1 U.C. at INDY=same direction to me.

Posts: 2634 | From: The highway | Registered: Feb 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
case
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for case     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Will:
A BASHER! GIVE ME A BREAK!!
"He was just a basher in gullible clothing?"
I've got a lot tied up into cmkx!
More like just bored reading the same ole same ole, of you guys going back and forth arguing
about this stock, Some saying its a scam, others saying no is not.
It could be scam or it might be a diamond in the rye. You are right, I'm not a newby and I've been on this board since Chicago Joe was here, (who is my all time favorite)
I like Dadog, all though I don't have the tools that Dadog uses.
(http://www.microcaptrade.com/otc/index.jsp)
I can asure you. I am no pumper and I am no BASHER! Like I said, Just bored and wanted to have some fun. I probably shouldn't of had decided to have some fun with you guys, but I couldn't help it. (the devil made me do it)
But, I'm not pulling your leg, when I don't under stand every thing cmkx is doing! I hope its for the good of the share holders.
TRUST ME THOUGH! I'M NEITHER PUMPER OR BASHER! You guys can go back to fighting back and forth, I'll still take a quick glance at it. Looking forward to your next news letter.
Take care!
Casey

Posts: 94 | Registered: Nov 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
will
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for will     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
What? It all counts in the scenario case proposed.
quote:
Originally posted by highwaychild:
I don't Think UCADs % counts.
Rendel Williams-1 U.C. at INDY=same direction to me.


Posts: 4893 | From: Burbank IL USA | Registered: Feb 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Money_Penny
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Money_Penny     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Will, don't know and too lazy to go through the last few PRs to find out (I'm sure somebody here knows the answer already - come on bashers, what is it???).

Highway, why do you think UCAD does not count???


Posts: 430 | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
will
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for will     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
case, I think you misunderstood me? I asked if others thought you a basher in gullible clothing? Seems that was their implication. I am of the same opinion you are regarding this company. No one knows. Since you offered the possibility of selling claims, and leaving it with no value I was just curious about what others thought. The outstanding questions are still not answered. I'll spare everyone and not list them again. Only the company can answer them.

quote:
Originally posted by case:
Will:
A BASHER! GIVE ME A BREAK!!
"He was just a basher in gullible clothing?"
I've got a lot tied up into cmkx!
More like just bored reading the same ole same ole, of you guys going back and forth arguing
about this stock, Some saying its a scam, others saying no is not.
It could be scam or it might be a diamond in the rye. You are right, I'm not a newby and I've been on this board since Chicago Joe was here, (who is my all time favorite)
I like Dadog, all though I don't have the tools that Dadog uses.
(http://www.microcaptrade.com/otc/index.jsp)
I can asure you. I am no pumper and I am no BASHER! Like I said, Just bored and wanted to have some fun. I probably shouldn't of had decided to have some fun with you guys, but I couldn't help it. (the devil made me do it)
But, I'm not pulling your leg, when I don't under stand every thing cmkx is doing! I hope its for the good of the share holders.
TRUST ME THOUGH! I'M NEITHER PUMPER OR BASHER! You guys can go back to fighting back and forth, I'll still take a quick glance at it. Looking forward to your next news letter.
Take care!
Casey


Posts: 4893 | From: Burbank IL USA | Registered: Feb 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
will
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for will     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Too lazy, lol. Then you're not going to know when it is greater than 50%, and you'll miss your sell point. However, I understand lazy. I just keep going back to that very first UCAD deal, Upman can find the PR. They got claims back in April, May, June, cheap, cheap, cheap. I think it was $50,000 split three ways, CMKX's end is about $17,000. Just seemed to sweet to me. almost like a give away. I often wonder about the true ownership of UCAD.

quote:
Originally posted by Money_Penny:
Will, don't know and too lazy to go through the last few PRs to find out (I'm sure somebody here knows the answer already - come on bashers, what is it???).

Highway, why do you think UCAD does not count???



Posts: 4893 | From: Burbank IL USA | Registered: Feb 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Highwaychild
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for Highwaychild     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I think UCAD & CMKX are on the same page.
R.W.was at the Indy races in place of U.C.
He said he wants what CMKX has.
IMO he NEEDS what U.C. has.He has put his neck on the block.UCAD want's CMKX to become a reporting co. so they can move up to the AMEX.

Posts: 2634 | From: The highway | Registered: Feb 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
case
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for case     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Will:
What you guys, really think really don't make a difference to me.
What my main concern is about them doing is a MASG play.Giving the claims away and leaving share holders holding the bag. Thats all.
I hope this baby flies better than MASG.
I'm always a little gun shy of that happening again. Take care, I'll catch you later. I'm
tired and have to go to work tomorrow.

Posts: 94 | Registered: Nov 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
will
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for will     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Still, when the claims are sold they are gone. Think of the value of CMKX in the end. Same page means nothing. You own CMKX and a smigion of UCAD, 9/24/04.

quote:
Originally posted by highwaychild:
I think UCAD & CMKX are on the same page.
R.W.was at the Indy races in place of U.C.
He said he wants what CMKX has.
IMO he NEEDS what U.C. has.He has put his neck on the block.UCAD want's CMKX to become a reporting co. so they can move up to the AMEX.


Posts: 4893 | From: Burbank IL USA | Registered: Feb 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
will
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for will     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I recall MASG. They had a PR come out saying the abritrator ruled against them in a 21M$ suit. They tried to put a favorable spin on the news and went to court. I sold as soon as I saw the PR regarding the finding of the arbritrator, losing only 10%. Of course the court agreed with the arbritrator. It went from over .01 to a micro penny. I saw it on my volume list yesterday closed at .0009. Good reason to be shy. Things like that do happen.

quote:
Originally posted by case:
Will:
What you guys, really think really don't make a difference to me.
What my main concern is about them doing is a MASG play.Giving the claims away and leaving share holders holding the bag. Thats all.
I hope this baby flies better than MASG.
I'm always a little gun shy of that happening again. Take care, I'll catch you later. I'm
tired and have to go to work tomorrow.


Posts: 4893 | From: Burbank IL USA | Registered: Feb 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Highwaychild
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for Highwaychild     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Originally posted by will:
Still, when the claims are sold they are gone. Think of the value of CMKX in the end. Same page means nothing. You own CMKX and a smigion of UCAD, 9/24/04.


Noone knows for sure. It'll come down to who's more intelligant,OR if they(U.C & R.W.) are truly working together on this.


Posts: 2634 | From: The highway | Registered: Feb 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
will
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for will     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
So, what are you saying? UC owns UCAD through. with, by, etc... RW?
Interesting proposition, if that's waht you're saying ???

quote:
Originally posted by highwaychild:
Noone knows for sure. It'll come down to who's more intelligant,OR if they(U.C & R.W.) are truly working together on this.


Posts: 4893 | From: Burbank IL USA | Registered: Feb 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Wallace#1
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Wallace#1         Edit/Delete Post 
highwaychild,

There is NO WAY they - CMKX - could qualify for an AMEX listing. They will be lucky to get out of the pinks to OTC-BB. EARNINGS! EARNINGS!

They are more likely to go bankrupt than to show any earnings whatsoever.


Posts: 3607 | From: NJ - Outside Phila. | Registered: Mar 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Highwaychild
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for Highwaychild     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Not talkin' about CMKX,they'll have to be on OTC.bb before UCAD can be on AMEX.

I'm gone.this INDY. and N.E. game is gettining too good.I've got to watch this.


Posts: 2634 | From: The highway | Registered: Feb 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
will
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for will     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I'll have to think about mr. case's scenario in conjunction with childs suspicions about UC & RW.
What would that spell, Wallace?

[This message has been edited by will (edited September 09, 2004).]


Posts: 4893 | From: Burbank IL USA | Registered: Feb 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Wallace#1
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Wallace#1         Edit/Delete Post 
Will,

Since they have shown no record of earnings, they would not qualify for an AMEX listing either.

As far as ownership of UCAD and CMKX is concerned, there is no question in my mind that the Casavant family own control of CMKX.
With UCAD, I am not 100% sure, but I do not think UC or family have any major interest. My guess is that Rendal Williams owns control of UCAD or it is whoever owns both Nevada Minerals and IB2000 that controls UCAD. Remember, at least some time back, it was an S3 filing with the SEC that indicated Nev Min and IB2000 (both privately held firms) combined owned what appeared to be a controlling interest in UCAD. I have tried to find out the specific ownership control of Nevada Minerals/IB2000 with no luck, but I think that is a major key as to the control of UCAD. It may be Williams, a guy named Jarvis, or someone else...remotely possible that it is UC.

I could be wrong, but I see no combination of CMKX and UCAD.

[This message has been edited by Wallace#1 (edited September 10, 2004).]


Posts: 3607 | From: NJ - Outside Phila. | Registered: Mar 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
will
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for will     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Well, wouldn't that be interesting if it was UC? Just something to think about.

quote:
Originally posted by Wallace#1:
Will,

Since they have shown no record of earnings, they would not qualify for an AMEX listing either.

As far as ownership of UCAD and CMKX is concerned, there is no question in my mind that the Casavant family own control of CMKX.
With UCAD, I am not 100% sure, but I do not think UC or family have any major interest. My guess is that Rendal Williams owns control of UCAD or it is whoever owns both Nevada Minerals and IB2000 that controls UCAD. Remember, at least some time back, it was an S3 filing with the SEC that indicated Nev Min and IB2000 (both privately held firms) combined owned what appeared to be a controlling interest in UCAD. I have tried to find out the specific ownership control of Nevada Minerals/IB2000 with no luck, but I think that is a major key as to the control of UCAD. It may be Williams, a guy named Jarvis, or someone else...remotely possible that it is UC.



Posts: 4893 | From: Burbank IL USA | Registered: Feb 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
noahltl
New Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for noahltl     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
OK everybody here is the connection that I have been looking for. Everyone remeber Mirador. That's the company that we were going to merge with, but was put on hold.

Mirador later became Vway International. Vway is still an active corp and registered with the Secy of State Nev at the exact same address as St George Metals. Even the same suite #.


Name: ST. GEORGE METALS, INC.

Type: Corporation File Number: C4070-1984 State: NEVADA Incorporated On: June 13, 1984
Status: Reinstated Corp Type: Regular
Resident Agent: MARK GIEBELHAUS (Accepted)
Address: 1350 E FLAMINGO RD #688

LAS VEGAS NV 89119-
President: MARK GIEBELHAUS
Address: 1350 E. FLAMINGO RD #688

LAS VEGAS NV 89119-
Secretary:



Name: VWAY INTERNATIONAL

Type: Corporation File Number: C5169-1987 State: NEVADA Incorporated On: July 08, 1987
Status: Reinstated Corp Type: Regular
Resident Agent: GORDON FORGEY (Accepted)
Address: 1350 E. FLAMINGO RD
#688
LAS VEGAS NV 89119-
President: GORDON FORGEY
Address: 1350 E. FLAMINGO RD
#688
LAS VEGAS NV 89119-
Secretary: GORDON FORGEY
Address: 1350 E. FLAMINGO RD
#688
LAS VEGAS NV 89119-
Treasurer: GORDON FORGEY
Address: 1350 E. FLAMINGO RD
#688
LAS VEGAS NV 89119-

Name: VWAY INTERNATIONAL (VWYI)

Type: Corporation
File Number: C5169-1987
State: NEVADA
Incorporated On: July 08, 1987

Status: Reinstated
Corp Type: Regular

Resident Agent:
GORDON FORGEY (Accepted)
Address: 1350 E. FLAMINGO RD #688
LAS VEGAS NV 89119-

President: GORDON FORGEY
Address: 1350 E. FLAMINGO RD #688
LAS VEGAS NV 89119-

Secretary: GORDON FORGEY
Address: 1350 E. FLAMINGO RD #688
LAS VEGAS NV 89119-

Treasurer: GORDON FORGEY
Address: 1350 E. FLAMINGO RD #688
LAS VEGAS NV 89119-

DailyListDate|Type|NewSymbol|OldSymbol|NewName|OldName|EffDate|Comments|Notes|CoPhone|Mkt_Cat
07/01/2004 13:45:36|S2|VWYI|MRDR|VWAY International Common Stock|MIRADOR INC Common Stock|07/02/2004|1-500 R/S **|||u http://www.otcbb.com/dailylist/txthistory/BB07012004.txt


Posts: 2 | From: Noblesville, IN | Registered: Oct 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Wallace#1
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Wallace#1         Edit/Delete Post 
Will,

It just makes no sense to me that UC, no matter what anyone may think of him, would be messing around with a company like CMKX selling at .0004 when, if he controlled UCAD, he could mess around with a company selling for a considerably larger amount per share.

Someone should ask Melvin. LOL

[This message has been edited by Wallace#1 (edited September 10, 2004).]


Posts: 3607 | From: NJ - Outside Phila. | Registered: Mar 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Wallace#1
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Wallace#1         Edit/Delete Post 
My compliments, noahltl. That was what I do call DD. Nice find.!

Good night.


Posts: 3607 | From: NJ - Outside Phila. | Registered: Mar 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
noahltl
New Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for noahltl     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Originally posted by Wallace#1:
My compliments, noahltl. That was what I do call DD. Nice find.!

Good night.


Thanks Wallace, with us agreeing twice tonight, we're almost buddies.


Posts: 2 | From: Noblesville, IN | Registered: Oct 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
noahltl
New Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for noahltl     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The downside on the address is that it is just a rental mailbox.
http://www.kitcar.com/consumeralert/Ck3/research-suite.html

Posts: 2 | From: Noblesville, IN | Registered: Oct 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
bill1352
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for bill1352     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
as has been said in here before if you follow the trail of companies remotely involved in cmkx and buy their stock there is money to be made. that stock noah found opened at 1.11 droped to .85 and closed at 1.18...has a 52 wk high of 25.00 and that was before a 1:500 r/s
Posts: 3651 | From: Algonac, MI. 48001 | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
noahltl
New Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for noahltl     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Very interesting theory by Pedro. Long, but worth the read.

Posted by: Pedro2004
In reply to: None Date:9/10/2004 9:36:18 AM
Post #of 94019

Pedro’s Theory

Everyone out there is posting their own theories about CMKX.

What the heck!
I will post mine.

The following is my opinion.

IMO – Remember that!

Will the PPS of CMKX ever reach: “To The Moon?”


No.
Never!

If you are waiting for the PR on the O/S, hoping the PPS of CMKX will reach the Pennies?
It will never happen.

If you are waiting for a PR on the Mother Load, hoping the PPS of CMKX will reach the Pennies?
It will never happen.


Why?
There are 1.5 Trillion Shares of CMKX being traded on the market.
Every time the PPS goes up, shareholders of the 1.5 trillion (shares) will sell.
Selling will lower the PPS.

Why?
The MM’s will never allow CMKX to reach into the Pennies.
Every time the PPS goes up, the MM’s will continue to short sale CMKX into oblivion.
Selling (NSS) will lower the PPS.

In other words:
There are too many shares on the open market (1.5 Trillion Shares).
And, the MM’s can create as many “more” shares as they want.

What do we know about the Carolyn Core Analysis?


Nothing!

///////////////

What do we know from the Canadian JV Partner’s PR?
http://www.stockhouse.com/news/news.asp?newsid=2332437&tick=UCA

Five (5) holes were drilled.
Let’s break down each drilled hole separately by percentages.

Hole #1 = 20%
Hole #2 = 20%
Hole #3 = 20%
Hole #4 = 20%
Hole #5 = 20%
Total = 100%

Only two (2) Holes were sampled
(The results are for holes #1 and #2).

Of these two holes sampled, only 50% of each hole was sampled
(The samples are of split NQ, and the other half of the core has been retained in a secure warehouse).

Therefore each hole should be broken down into “Sampled” and “Not Sampled”

Hole #1 = Sampled = 10%
Hole #1 = Not Sampled = 10%
Hole #2 = Sampled = 10%
Hole #2 = Not Sampled = 10%
Hole #3 = Sampled = 0.00%
Hole #3 = Not Sampled = 20%
Hole #4 = Sampled = 0.00%
Hole #4 = Not Sampled = 20%
Hole #5 = Sampled = 0.00%
Hole #5 = Not Sampled = 20%
Total = 100%

Add up the percentage “Sampled” and percentage “Not Sampled:”

Sampled = 20%
Not Sampled = 80%

//////////////

20% of the drilled samples have been tested for “Diamonds.”
80% of the drilled samples have NOT been tested for “Diamonds.”

0.00% of the drilled samples have been tested for “Other Valuable Materials.”
100% of the drilled samples have NOT been tested for “Other Valuable Materials".

What do we know about the UCAD Stock Dividend?


The good part about the UCAD Stock Dividend is that we know the “Issued and O/S Shares of CMKX.”
http://www.otcbb.com/asp/dividend.asp?sym_id=CMKX&dDate=08/20/2004&sDateType=Record_date

///////////////

What is the Issued and O/S Shares of CMKX?
(7,500,000) / (0.00000962) = 779,625,779,626

The Issued and O/S Shares of CMKX is: 779,625,779,626 Shares

///////////////

How many shares of UCAD will we receive?
(1) / (0.00000962) = 103,950

We will receive one (1) share of UCAD for every 103,950 shares of CMKX

///////////////

What we DO NOT KNOW is:

What are the Restricted Shares of CMKX?
What is the Tradable Float of CMKX?

///////////////

On September 24, 2004: The Pay Date of the UCAD Stock Dividend.
On this date we will know the true “Issued and O/S Shares of CMKX.”

What do we know about the CIM Stock Dividend?


Before we continue, you must understand the ratio structure of the CIM Dividend.

Normally a dividend ratio is calculated by using the “Issued and O/S Shares” of a company. Just like UCAD above.

However, CIM is different.

The CIM Dividend Ratio is calculated by using the “Total Shares Owned by All Shareholders.”

You need to understand the wording of the PR that was issued.
The key words are:
----- Pro Rata
----- All CMKM shareholders
http://biz.yahoo.com/bw/040719/196042_1.html

///////////////

What is UC doing?

Let’s use this example:

There are 1.5 Trillion Shares of CMKX on the market.

Hypothetically, I personally own 150 Billion Shares.
Therefore, I would own 10% of all CMKX shares on the market.

Forget about the percentage (%) based on the A/S of 800 Billion Shares.
Forget about the percentage (%) based on the O/S of 779.5 Billion Shares (from UCAD above).
Focus only on “All CMKM Shareholders,” all tradable shares on the market, all shares owned by all shareholders. All of the Real and NSS shares on the tradable market.


Hypothetically, I personally own 10% of all CMKX shares on the market.
There are 40 Billion CIM Shares available for the dividend.
My CIM Stock dividend would be 10% of 40 billion shares available.

My portion (percentage) of the 40 Billion Shares would be: 4 Billion Shares.
(40,000,000,000) x (0.10) = 4,000,000,000

///////////////

There are three reasons why UC is calculating the CIM dividend ratio based on “all CMKM shareholders” on the market:
-- 1. UC wants everyone to receive the same percentage of CIM ownership, as each individual currently owns in CMKX *** (same percentage based on all shares of CMKX on the market).
-- 2. CIM is a private company *** (is not currently traded on the market).
-- 3. Will eliminate any NSS Stock Dividends paid on CIM *** (or eliminate any NSD, Naked Short Dividend paid).

Remember, UC is trying to avoid a NSS problem with CIM.

Issuing CIM Stock Dividends to CMKX NSS Shareholders would create a NSS problem with CIM.
(Or a NSD problem – Naked Short Dividends)

///////////////

The good part about the CIM Stock Dividend is that we know the “Total Shares Owned by All Shareholders.”
http://www.otcbb.com/asp/dividend.asp?sym_id=CMKX&dDate=08/31/2004&sDateType=Record_date

///////////////

What is the Total Share owned by “All CMKM Shareholders?”
(40,000,000,000) / (0.0256) = 1,562,500,000,000

The Total Share owned by “All CMKM Shareholders is: 1,562,500,000,000

///////////////

How many shares of CIM will we receive?
(1) / (0.0256) = 39

We will receive one (1) share of UCAD for every 39 shares of CMKX

///////////////

Based on the information from the UCAD dividend above:
Based on the information from the CIM dividend above:
We know the Illegal NSS shares of CMKX.

(1,562,500,000,000) – (779,625,779,626) = 782,874,220,374

The amount of CMKX illegal NSS shares on the market: 782.8 Billion Shares.

///////////////

On October 1st: We will know the true amount of Shares owned by “All CMKM Shareholders.”

What do we know about the GEMM Stock Dividend?


The good part about the GEMM Stock Dividend is that we will reconfirm the “Issued and O/S Shares of CMKX.”

September 24th: GEMM dividend ratio will be filed with NASDAQ
October 1st: GEMM Stock Dividends will be paid.

What do we know about KPG, UCA and Shane Resources?


We know that a JV Partnership already exists with CMKX at the new drill site.

Did you know that the Board of Directors on these three companies are related?

Are all these three companies a separate business entity?
Or are these companies going to become one (1) company in the future?

///////////////

United Carina Resources (UCA)

Number of Directors – Three (3) http://www.sedar.com/csfsprod/data46/filings/00648013/00000001/C%3A%5CFILINGS%5CUCANTC-03.pdf

Names of Directors:
Richard Walker
Richard T. Kusmirski
Mike Magrum http://www.sedar.com/csfsprod/data46/filings/00647857/00000001/C%3A%5CFILINGS%5CUCAbdec03.pdf

///////////////

Comsolidate Pine Channel Gold (KPG)

Number of Directors – Three (3) http://www.sedar.com/csfsprod/data44/filings/00623443/00000001/C%3A%5CFILINGS%5CPCNTC-03.pdf

Names of Directors:
Richard Walker
Richard T. Kusmirski
Mike Magrum http://www.sedar.com/csfsprod/data44/filings/00623439/00000002/C%3A%5CFILINGS%5CpcBoct03.pdf

///////////////

Shane Resources

Number of Directors – Four (4) http://www.sedar.com/csfsprod/data46/filings/00647714/00000001/C%3A%5CFILINGS%5CSNTC-03.pdf

Names of Directors:
Richard Walker
Mike Magrum
Stephen Marks
Wayne Sanderson http://www.sedar.com/csfsprod/data46/filings/00647821/00000001/C%3A%5CFILINGS%5Cshbdec03.pdf

///////////////

What about the Canadian JV Partners (KPG, UCA and Shane Resources)?
These companies are traded on the Canadian Stock Exchange.

If these companies want to be traded on the US Market, the companies would have to purchase and/or set up a US Publicly Traded Company.

UC will not issue Stock Dividends in a Canadian Market Company.
UC will issue Stock Dividends in a US Market Company.

What do we know about the SGGM?


Nothing!

What about the 200 Billion Shares?
We will receive those shares as a stock dividend.

This shell company is the type of scenario that our Canadian JV Partners could execute if they wanted to become a publicly traded company in the US Markets.

What do we know about the Nevada Minerals?


We know that Nevada Minerals is a Private Company.

We know that on June 24th, there was a meeting with Nevada Minerals to discuss the Goldak Airborne Magnetic Survey Results.
http://biz.yahoo.com/bw/040624/245665_1.html

///////////////

We know that on July 26th, whatever was discovered by the aerial survey was important enough for CMKX to purchase the mineral rights from Nevada Minerals.
http://biz.yahoo.com/bw/040726/266016_1.html


Will CMKX ever have an R/S?


No!

Why?
Because of the Nevada Minerals Transaction!
Because UC has just donated his personal CMKX shares to charity!

///////////////

Nevada Minerals just sold CMKX the Mineral Rights to 500 Thousand Acres.
In exchange, Nevada Minerals received 75 Billion Shares of CMKX.

Although the purchasing contract is not available for review, the purchasing contract between CMKX and Nevada Minerals would have a clause and/or stipulation stating that CMKX would not do an R/S (or “no” dilution clause).

Why?
Because if CMKX did a R/S, Nevada Minerals 75 Billion Shares would be reduced.
Because if CMKX did a R/S, Nevada Minerals would loose equity in CMKX.

Nevada Minerals would not “give away” their assets without protection.
Thus, if CMKX did an R/S, the 500 Thousand Acres would go back to Nevada Minerals.

///////////////

UC just gave away Billions of his personal CMKX Shares to charity and the needy.

If UC did an R/S, after donating the shares, the donated shares would have little value.

This would really make UC look like an idiot!

So there will be no R/S on CMKX.

What is happening to the Mineral Rights of CMKX?


The Mineral Rights of CMKX are slowly being transferred to other companies.

So far 30% of the Mineral Rights have been allocated.
We still need to allocate the other 70%.

What will be the percentage breakdown?
15 % = UCAD
10 % = CIM
05 % = SGGM
?? % = KPG, UCA and Shane Resources
?? % = Any other companies (we can only guess at this time)

///////////////

Eventually 100% of the CMKX Mineral Rights will be transferred to other companies.

In exchange, CMKX will receive shares of stock from the purchasing company.

In return, CMKX will issue to all shareholders a Stock Dividend in those companies.

Everyone who owns shares in CMKX will have the same percentage ownership of the other companies.

///////////////

What will happen to CMKX?

CIM will purchase the remaining assets of CMKX.

CIM will offer a liquidating cash dividend to all CMKX Shareholders.

CMKX will be liquidated.
CMKX will no longer exist!

No more NSS problem with CMKX.

What will happen to all the companies who own the Mineral Rights?


So far we have in ownership:
15 % = UCAD
10 % = CIM
05 % = SGGM
?? % = KPG, UCA and Shane Resources
?? % = Any other companies (we can only guess at this time)

///////////////

At some time in the future, look for a major merge of all the companies listed above.

///////////////

Since we were all issued specified percentage of stock dividends in the above companies, we will end up with a specified percentage of the merging company.

What has UC accomplished?


UC has straightened out the NSS problem of CMKX.

UC has successfully transferred the CMKX Mineral Rights into companies that the MM’s will not be able to manipulate.

Any MM manipulation or attempted NSS manipulation on the new companies will be monitored and addressed by each company immediately and respectfully.

The final Merging Company will be upgraded to a higher market board (AMEX sounds nice).


Why did I write this?


Because I am entitled to my own opinion!

You can agree and/or disagree with what I wrote above.

http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=4005346



Posts: 2 | From: Noblesville, IN | Registered: Oct 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Money_Penny
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Money_Penny     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
WOW!
Posts: 430 | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
TradingWizard
Member


Icon 12 posted      Profile for TradingWizard         Edit/Delete Post 
'If' this all above becomes true in the future, UC is better start planning his disguise costume because someone will hunt him down.

Anyway I burst laughing this morning because of this so here it is:

How To Treat a Cough
--------------------
The owner of a drug store walks in to find a guy leaning heavily against a wall. The owner asks the clerk, "What's with that guy over there by the wall?"

The clerk says, "Well, he came in here this morning to get something for his cough. I couldn't find the cough syrup, so I gave him an entire bottle of laxative."

The owner says, "You idiot! You can't treat a cough with laxatives!"

The clerk says, "Oh yeah? Look at him, he's afraid to cough!"


Posts: 1021 | From: Canada | Registered: Feb 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
  This topic comprises 75 pages: 1  2  3  ...  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  ...  73  74  75   

Post New Topic  New Poll  
Topic Closed  Topic Closed
Open Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


Contact Us | Allstocks.com Message Board Home

© 1997 - 2021 Allstocks.com. All rights reserved.

Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.2

Share