posted
Wallace can I ask you why you are so intent on bring 'facts' and information to other shareholders of this stock, when you, yourself, have stated you have no position in the stock?
I am asking an honest question. What moves you so much to report on and about this stock when you have nothing to gain?
posted
I agree with Zeninvestors take on this PR and pretty much everything in his post of today. Looking forward to the PR that is coming soon from the meeting in Canada. I think it will be good. Good Night all, God Bless-IMO-Debi
Posts: 1188 | From: Clinton, MA 01510 | Registered: Jan 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
Today's p/r puts us one step closer to being out of the diamond business and into the racing business. What is this company doing and where is their focus? We are supposed to be in the diamond exploration business and look what's happening. The racing website is back up and running while the diamond site remains dead. This card has nothing to do with the drilling business but can greatly benefit the racing business through merchandise sales, ticket purchases, etc. I see that "Z" claims that this will enable the company to streamline the payout of any cash dividends it decides to issue. How? Thousands of cash dividends are paid out every year by public companies, how many of them go to a prepaid credit card? My hunch is none. If anything, it will make the process more cumbersome and costly as not all shareholders (if any) will posses one of these cards. There is going to be a lot of positive spin put on this in the next few days but in my opinion, it is a step away from what everyone here invested in and a step towards something completely different. That may or may not be good, it's up to all of us individually to decide.
Posts: 5729 | From: Wisconsin | Registered: Sep 2003
| IP: Logged |
I hope you were sincere in your question. I will answer.
One reason is because I do have something to gain or lose if I invest in this stock, and that is money. I have bought and sold this stock for a minor loss of $410. I have also bought and sold this stock for a decent profit. The net result is a nice gain for my portfolio. If I can do it again with this stock, I most certainly will. However, the price I purchase at has to be at my last purchase (.0002 or lower). If not, I will not purchase more.
The rest of my reasons involve my experience and knowledge. One of the main functions of my positions on Wall Street was to protect shareholders' interests. Believe me when I say that was ingrained into me and every person that worked under my direction. It is something I have never lost.
Two examples:
I don't give a donkey fart about how much money Dick Grasso made at the New York Stock Exchange. What I do care about if that his major responsibilities were to protect the investing community. It was his responsibility to see that there were no conflicts of interests with listed companies, that there was no insider trading, that financial reporting was accurate and honest, that all transactions between the companies and insiders went to shareholders for approval and that all company transactions with anyone or any company were arm's length. This, in my opinion is where he failed. And I d*amn well know he knew better. Then I see him go to his private club with all his cronies (including some of those who gave him the $$ he did not earn) laughing and scratching about the whole thing.
Martha Stewart deserved more than she got as far as I am concerned. Whether the prosecutors went after her for insider trading or not, she was guilty of that in my opinion. She was a corporate officer of a listed company and knew insider trading is illegal. She was a broker and knew that insider trading is illegal. She had a seat on the NYSE and knew that insider trading was illegal. So, the got her on something else? How about the many investors in that company lost money because of what happened and dumped shares at a loss? How many investors of her own company have/had shares and have lost money? All she got was a slap on the wrist as far as I am concerned. I had inside information every day of every year and never once used it or passed it on.
These are just two of the incidents on Wall Street that have disgusted me. You should be able to name more such as Enron and the like. When I worked and managed on Wall St., neither I, nor anyone I supervised nor anyone I knew did such things. Maybe I am from a different generation, but my ethics and honesty have never changed to what seems to be the standard operating procedure of people within the last 10 years or so.
A further reason is that I happen to know how the securities markets operate, I know the language and I know the mechanics. Maybe a little rusty, but it does come back to me with a little thought. Once I found out how the MMs operate, who they are and how to read the trades the rest was simple. A MM's function is little different from that of a "specialist" on the Big Board. He makes the market in a given stock or group of stocks and is charged with keeping that market orderly. He buys when no one is buying and sells when no one is selling within limits. To cut this shorter, because I have gone on too long, I can be of help to others in explaining the markets' operations because I have been there through good and bad times. The mechanics were almost like a second nature to me compared to the responsibilities I had every minute of the day. If I can impart even a tiny part of information that may help someone understand, I have been willing and pleased to do so and I don't need any credit or pats on the back for it. You folks couldn't begin to know how many PRs, SEC Filings, Proxy Statements, Shareholder Reports, Annual and Interim Reports, Option Plans, Debenture Offerings, Public Offerings, etc. I have reviewed, analyzed and approved, disapproved or required modifications to as well as those that I supervised.
This old man with his oxygen tank is almost ready to hit the sack. And, yes, I do have an oxygen tank MP. I have emphysema with a lung capacity down by 75% and told I have 5 years or less to live.
posted
I have read most of the message boards pertaining to CMKX and this one is, by far, the best at giving all points of view (pro and con). There are some uneeded personal attacks by both sides and if those could be elimanated ...well you understand where I'm going with this. Just a "Thank You" to everyone (both sides)for your DD and opionions.
Posts: 14 | Registered: Aug 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
and I don't know why I got honorable mention on this thread .....
And since Enron was mentioned somewhere in the converstation, I thought I bring this in for fun (people for fun only - no need to attack me - don't like it then move on).
How to explain Enron!
Feudalism: You have two cows. Your Lord takes some of the milk
Fascism: You have two cows. The government takes both, hires you to take care of them, and sells you the milk.
Communism: You have two cows. Your neighbors help take care of them and you share the milk.
Totalitarianism: You have two cows. The governement takes them both and denies they ever existed and drafts you into the army. Milk is banned.
Capitalism: You have two cows. You sell one and buy a bull. Your herd multiplies, and the economy grows. You sell them and retire on the income.
Enron Venture Capitalism: You have two cows. You sell three of them to your publicly listed company, using letters of credit opened by your brother-in-law at the bank, then exercute a debt/equity swap with an associated general offer so that you get all four cows back, with a tax exemption for five cows. The milk rights of the six cows are transferred via an intermediary to a Cayman Island company secretly owned by the majority share-holder who sells the rights to all seven cows back to your listed company. The annual report says the company owns eight cows, with an option on one more.
[This message has been edited by TradingWizard (edited August 12, 2004).]
posted
Good read Wallace. Nice to get some background on you.
By the way, I'm sorry to hear about your emphysema. If you're interested in a product I know about that you like the results of shoot me an email. My address is available in my profile.
[This message has been edited by Brad (edited August 12, 2004).]
You have two cows. You sell three of them to your publicly listed company, using letters of credit opened by your brother-in-law at the bank, then exercute a debt/equity swap with an associated general offer so that you get all four cows back, with a tax exemption for five cows. The milk rights of the six cows are transferred via an intermediary to a Cayman Island company secretly owned by the majority share-holder who sells the rights to all seven cows back to your listed company. The annual report says the company owns eight cows, with an option on one more.
Sounds like the CMKM option shuffle and polka fest...lol
posted
Trading wizard wrote: and I don't know why I got honorable mention on this thread ..... And since Enron was mentioned somewhere in the converstation, I thought I bring this in for fun (people for fun only - no need to attack me - don't like it then move on).
How to explain Enron!
Feudalism: You have two cows. Your Lord takes some of the milk
Fascism: You have two cows. The government takes both, hires you to take care of them, and sells you the milk.
Communism: You have two cows. Your neighbors help take care of them and you share the milk.
Totalitarianism: You have two cows. The governement takes them both and denies they ever existed and drafts you into the army. Milk is banned.
Capitalism: You have two cows. You sell one and buy a bull. Your herd multiplies, and the economy grows. You sell them and retire on the income.
Enron Venture Capitalism: You have two cows. You sell three of them to your publicly listed company, using letters of credit opened by your brother-in-law at the bank, then exercute a debt/equity swap with an associated general offer so that you get all four cows back, with a tax exemption for five cows. The milk rights of the six cows are transferred via an intermediary to a Cayman Island company secretly owned by the majority share-holder who sells the rights to all seven cows back to your listed company. The annual report says the company owns eight cows, with an option on one more. --------------------------------------------- TW-You are an early contender for post of the day with this one. Just have to love it.
Wallace -I liked your treatise on the various players. I think you are right and wrong on Martha. Right-because that would be the appropriate punishment for the crime. Wrong -because if justice isn't meted out fairly it isn't justice. If she had been a man or a woman who didn't personify 'domestic goddessness' she wouldn't have been sentenced at all. Her Leona Helmsley type penchant for making enemies is what really sentenced her to prison. That is my opinion only.
Hope everyone has a great day. -Debi
Posts: 1188 | From: Clinton, MA 01510 | Registered: Jan 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
Weeks or months ago when we were first discussing CMKX and that it possibly had a large naked short position; people were asking for examples of pennies that were naked shorted which ran. I couldn't think of one at the time. But I was getting a post ready for VLVT and I remember it was stuck well below .003 but can't remember the exact price. It hadn't budged in months+. It was more than 2 years ago. I do remember the run. So here is the post I put on the VLVT thread with the multi year chart. I don't think the chart copies well to allstocks. I will delete some of the links. If you would like all the DD links you can find it on the similar but longer VLVT board post.
Profitable Penny that is not diluting. Third Quarterly Increase in a row. This had been horribly shorted to .003 or less for years and when it announced it's income it spiked to .095. It has struggled with its price but when it announced it's 2003 profit of .01 it went to .035. This stock is selling for less than it's last years income and is on target to make more money this year. A possible long term hold and good gainer on announcement of earnings. IMO-Debi
VELTEX CORP (VLVT) 0.009 -0.0005 (-5.26%) as of 08/11/2004 at 03:21PM EDT (Other OTC Delay: 0 mins.)
Intraday 1 Mo 3 Mo 6 Mo 9 Mo YTD 1 Yr 3 Yr 5 Yr 10 Yr
VLVT -- Veltex Corp. (UT) Com ($0.001)
Address: 19977 Harrison Ave. City of Industry CA 91789 USA Phone: 909-595-1977 Company Website: http://www.veltexcorp.com
Officers: Javeed Matin, Pres. & CEO
Shares Outstanding: 187,731,946 as of 2004-07-23
Estimated Market Cap: 1.689M as of 2004-08-11
Current Capital Change: None
Dividends: None
State of Incorporation: UT
Company News and Press Releases From Other Sources:
Veltex Announces Record First Quarter Sales and Earnings
CITY OF INDUSTRY, Calif., Jul 13, 2004 /PRNewswire-FirstCall via COMTEX/ -- Veltex Corporation (OTC: VLVT), a vertical manufacturing, import and distribution company in the apparel industry that is headquartered with sales and marketing offices in City of Industry, Calif., with factories in Bangladesh, announced today that net sales in the first quarter of 2004 totaled $10.9 million. Net income in the first quarter totaled $857,306. "We are very encouraged by these profitable results and continue to project that total sales in 2004 will exceed $25 million," said Javeed Matin, Chairman and CEO. Veltex sales in 2003 totaled $19.99 million, Company sales in 2002 totaled $13.9 million, and sales in 2001 were $8.7 million.
Veltex' net income in 2003 was $1.528 million, in 2002 totaled $1.65 million and was $1.3 million in 2001. "Sales have grown from $5.5 million in 1999 to almost $20 million in 2003 under current management," Mr. Matin said.
Veltex Corporation is a vertical manufacturing, import and distribution company composed of three divisions: Veltex Apparel, specializing in caps, apparel and apparel accessories for the Promotional Products Industry; Velvet Textile Mills, specializing in the manufacture of high quality fabrics including velvets, 100% cotton twill, denim, sheeting for consumer and industrial products; and KCA Garment Industries, specializing in the manufacture of garments.
Company News and Press Releases From Other Sources: Company Feature Veltex Corp. (VLVT.PK)Jul 14 2004 7:00AM ETVeltex Announces Record First Quarter Sales and EarningsJul 13 2004 2:11PM ETGlobal Explorations to Distribute Press Releases and Facilitate Public Relations for Veltex Corp; Fifth Public Company to Announce PartnershipJun 23 2004 6:31AM , Announces Record Sales in 2003May 19 2004 8:00AM ET
Posts: 1188 | From: Clinton, MA 01510 | Registered: Jan 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
Just a quickie about what I had previously posted.
What I was also trying to say but did not specify was that Dick Grasso, Martha Stewart, the Enron people and other top officers have a fiduciary responsibility to their shareholders and to the investing community. As far as I am concerned, they all have violated that duty.
With the above companies associated or involved they were/are, as far as I know, were all traded on the NYSE where there were rather rigid controls (but obviously not followed) and reporting requirements. With the pinks there are relatively few of those controls and many do not report at all. Conclusion? An investor is much more likely to get ripped off and scammed with the pinks than anywhere else securities are traded.
One last thing, where I worked on WS, I dealt with WS lawyers all the time. In practically every case where I had to get involved as management, those lawyers were trying to do something for a corporation that was not permitted and those lawyers were rough, tough and knowledgeable. Every one of them was working for the company client, not the shareholders. As far as writing a book or treatise about securities, trading and responsibilities is concerned, anyone that worked with me could have done that very easily.
posted
United Carina Resources Corp. Quick Quote: UCA 0.21 (Even)
Marksmen Resources Ltd.: Appointment of Director and Granting of Stock Options 8/11/04
NANAIMO, BRITISH COLUMBIA, Aug 11, 2004 (CCNMatthews via COMTEX) -- Marksmen Resources Ltd. ("Marksmen" or the "Company") is pleased to announce that Mr. Richard T. Kusmirski, M.Sc.,P.Geo. has been appointed as a director of the company. Mr. Kusmirski, a mineral geologist with over 25 years of exploration experience in North America and overseas, has actively participated in the discovery of a number of gold, uranium, and base metal deposits. Mr. Kusmirski is also the President, CEO, and a Director of JNR Resources Inc. ("JNN" TSX Venture Exchange), primarily a uranium exploration company with a market capitalization of approximately $40.0 million, and a director of United Carina Resources Corp. and Consolidated Pine Channel Gold Corp. Mr. Kusmirski, who previously held the position of Exploration Manager with Cameco Corporation prior to joining JNR Resources Inc., will work with Marksmen to explore strategic alternatives designed to maximize the value of the Company's mineral properties.
In conjunction with his appointment, Mr. Kusmirski has been granted a stock option to purchase 200,000 common shares at a price of $0.30 per share for a period of five years. In addition, Marksmen also announces that it has granted an additional 625,000 options to purchase common shares at a price of $0.30 per share for a period of five years to certain other directors and officers of the Company. The stock option grant is subject to regulatory approval. Marksmen has determined that exemptions from the various requirements of TSX Venture Exchange Policy 5.9 are available for the grant of stock options.
Marksmen Resources Ltd. is a Canadian based junior resource company with both gold and oil and gas properties. The Company's objectives are to increase production and cash flow from oil and gas operations and to explore its gold properties.
On behalf of the Board of Directors
"Brian Cebryk"
BRIAN CEBRYK
President
Statements in this press release may contain forward-looking statements. Except for statements of historical fact, all statements in this press release - including, without limitation, statements regarding future plans and objectives of the Company - are forward-looking statements that involve various risks and uncertainties. There can be no assurance that such statements will prove to be accurate and actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements.
Marksmen Resources Ltd. Brian Cebryk President (250) 890-0607 Email: info@marksmen.ca Website: www.marksmen.ca
NEWS RELEASE TRANSMITTED BY CCNMatthews The TSX Venture Exchange does not accept responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.
Copyright (C) 2004, CCNMatthews. All rights reserved.
Posts: 2 | From: Noblesville, IN | Registered: Oct 2004
| IP: Logged |
Thank you for that post of yours... You know sometimes it is hard for me to be 'mad' at you... Every once in a while you throw a light of humanity at us... It is very conflicting
Sorry to hear about your situation. I wouldn't go by what Doctors say, get yourself a nice pet or puppy and you'll go way past what the doctor said. I am being serious, having a pet adds a few years to a persons life...
============================================= Good morning all...
How's todays air in CMKX land???
Hello to everyone, the list is to big to type everyone's name,lol...
Well okay, just because I love you peeps...
TW MP Pharm Teen Trader (where have ya been buddy?!?!??!??!) Wallace (Yes he made my list, mortal enemies have to say hello too) WWJD Noah, our Commish ! Brad, Will Upside, and all the others! Good luck trading today!!!
Anyone feel like working some magic and getting USCI to jump, right now, to like a penny??? Please!!!
posted
Noah, UCA is currently tied into our CMKX....
Now does this PR, in your view, is connected to CMKX's current devolpments?
I've been hearing more and more whispers about Uranium... like from a month ago to now, the whispers have become much more louder in recent weeks...
What is your take on this? Great DD work, not just today, but in general
Uranium would surely be a cash crop for CMKX... and chances are the same processes that made diamonds probably created other natural resources as well...
quote:Originally posted by byrdturd: Noah, UCA is currently tied into our CMKX....
Now does this PR, in your view, is connected to CMKX's current devolpments?
I've been hearing more and more whispers about Uranium... like from a month ago to now, the whispers have become much more louder in recent weeks...
What is your take on this? Great DD work, not just today, but in general
Uranium would surely be a cash crop for CMKX... and chances are the same processes that made diamonds probably created other natural resources as well...
-John-
Byrd, since yesterday's post on Lunden Group, Kusmirski, and UCAD et al, kind of got overlooked when the value card PR came out, I'll repost it today.
Author: zeninvestor32
MY THOUGHTS 8/10
Just pure gridlock today both in trading and information. Not much to report.
Thanks to M.A. for the link to Rick Kusmirski's most recent appointment. I think this is further proof of just how respected and important Kusmirski is to uranium exploration/development. http://biz.yahoo.com/bw/040804/45674_1.html
And go here to review the bios of the others on the Technical board to see the great stature in which he has been placed. http://www.clanres.com/s/Management.asp
As for the 10 day disclosure rule, I'm tired of both bashers and longs suddenly proclaiming to be securities law experts. Roger is probably one of the very best attorneys in the country on being up to speed on every nuance of securities regs and filings, both with the SEC, the NASD and probably by now any Canadian governing bodies (and by the way, Roger WAS intimately involved with a MAJOR canadian deal before valued at $400M CAD -- http://www.fklaw.com/news-43.html -- had to point that out before the bashers attacked asking "What does he know about Canadian securities?"). Anyway, let Roger do the lawyering. IMO he knows exactly what needs to be reported and when. Anyone else proclaiming to "know" this area, please ask them what their credentials within securities law are.
And lastly, I guess it's been awhile since I posted this but I will post it again since some people have again raised the issue. I will state this outright. I have never received compensation in any form, whether stock, cash or other, directly or indirectly from CMKX or any related companies, affiliaties, subsidiaries, officers, directors, friends, vulcans, pelicans, etc. I would have to be an outright IDIOT to do so and not disclose it, thus risking disgorgement of any profits as well as possible criminal prosecution. For that matter, let me state that I have never personally spoken to Urban, Ron, Roger or even Melvin (although I have emailed Melvin but never got a response). I do not post anywhere else regarding CMKX on any other forum or message board. I do not participate in paltalk. I do not have any association whatsoever with any stock alert or newsletter or any other publication.
Ok, is that a complete enough disclaimer? I am a simple individual investor who has honest savings at risk in this investment. I think there are many others on the boards who you should be FAR more concerned with as to any ulterior motives or dealings. See you tomorrow.
Z
As always, these are my personal opinions.
Hopefully nobody in here is investing anything but "fun" money that they can afford to gamble with.
Posts: 2 | From: Noblesville, IN | Registered: Oct 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
I know someone posted the MM codes a day or two ago but I don't want to search for them. I saw L2 of 300. Is that the one that says "I need shares. Take the price down."?
Posts: 1005 | From: Grapevine, TX 76051 | Registered: Aug 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
Here is the Zen post that started all of the speculation over Uranium, Lundin Group etc. Well worth consideration.
The following is from Zeninvestor32 over at Investors Hub...
I HAVE SOME INFORMATION TO SHARE
My initial position on this information was "screw the short/bashers. they don't deserve to know this and I'd rather they be caught offguard if anything I have found out actually turns out true." Ultimately, given the bluntness of their attacks and my conviction today that this ball is rolling and cannot be stopped, I feel it in the best interests for me to share what I have uncovered with everyone.
A few disclaimers first. EVERYTHING contained herein is public information that I have obtained by simple searches online. Just a lot of dot connecting with publicly available information. I've provided all the links. I have not been tipped off by anyone and, in fact, have seen every one of these companies below touched on by a post online at some point. (Oddly enough TSX Miner actually tipped off the big gun). Second, I have no idea if ANY of this has any actual connection to CMKX. I present it for you to evaluate and reach your own conclusions. Personally, I find it compelling. You may not. How you treat this information is up to you. I am just posting what I have found. Again, there could be ZERO connection to CMKX within. You decide how to interpret this info. I may have nailed this and, conversely, I may have found NOTHING of any relevance. Only time and formal PRs by the company will tell.
Onwards we go.
First things first, I've already mentioned that I have some suspicions of uranium being somehow involved here. From what I have uncovered, this region of Canada (Saskatoon, Saskatchewan) is one of, if not THE, richest uranium regions in the world. It is no surprise that Cameco, the #1 uranium producer in the world, is headquartered here. ( http://www.cameco.com ) I have always figured that if any rights were to be sold off, this would be a key one to sell because uranium is so highly specialized and regulated. I just didn't think it was something that Urban or any of his family probably would care to deal with. So that being the case, my first logical conclusion was any uranium producer in the area might be interested. That lead me naturally to Cameco. But that's a pretty big leap without some kind of tie.
Now at the same time, I began looking more deeply into our Canadian JV partners wondering whether they had anything more to offer us than just some drilling money. I knew Rick Walker was involved in UCAD and also held officer positions at all three of our other JV partners (Carina, Pine, and Shane). So then I began dissecting all three of these JV partners knowing that something was obviously brewing with a merger of sorts. I mean, come on, Rick Walker is pres. of all 4 of our JV partners? Pretty obvious that SOMETHING was cooking. I just didn't (and don't) know what. But this lead me to look more closely at anyone else involved in those Canadian JV partners.
I came up with Rick Kusmirski. He's the only other director (besides Walker) listed for United Carina. ( http://www.unitedcarina.com )
Now a little background about Rick. He was the project manager for Cameco in their Athabasca Basin region exploration program. ( http://www.jnrresources.com/s/ManagementProfile.asp ) And he is the current President of JNR Resources which holds a JV agreement for uranium exploration in the Athabasca Basin region. Do minimal research on Athabasca Basin and you will find that it is considered probably the world's richest location for uranium. Number one. Naturally I saw something developing here. One of our chief guys among our Canadian JV partners wasn't just the exploration manager for Cameco, the #1 uranium producer in the world, he was their project manager for Cameco's #1 location -- the Athabasca Basin. I'd say this makes him what I would term a "heavy hitter" in the uranium business. And he is tightly woven into two of our Canadian JVs. I personally felt this was a pretty tight connection. But then I went further.
I mentioned that Rick Kusmirski is also the president of JNR Resources (trading as JNN on the Vancouver Exchange). ( http://www.jnrresources.com )
JNR Resources has two prominent JVs with International Uranium Corporation (trading as IUC on the Toronto Exchange). Now things get interesting. Just two weeks ago, the President of IUC became a director on the board at JNR Resources. ( http://www.resourceworldmag.com/news.cfm?show=newsresults,quote&id=232388&pfmt=1 ) I would say this makes for a VERY tight connection between UIC and JNR. There are only 4 directors at JNR. And one is the president of UIC. Well, naturally, this led me to look further into what Hochstein and UIC might be bringing to the table.
And that is when I was blown away. UIC is considered one of 11 corporations owned primarily by what are referred to as the Lundin Group. They are a multi-billion dollar family holding a collection of mineral and natural resource companies that leaves your mouth gaping. Here is a large PDF file that you can pull up all their information from ( http://www.intluranium.com/data/LundinGroupSummary.pdf )
UIC is one of their babies. And in fact, the largest shareholder of UIC is Adolf Lundin ( http://www.antenna.nl/wise/uranium/uciuc.html ). Adolf Lundin in fact I found out is the senior Lundin that basically is president, chair, or director of practically all their holdings along with his sons Ian and Lukas. By the way, the Lundins also own Lundin-Petroleum ( www.lundin-petroleum.com ) should we have any oil/gas rights Urban wants to sell. Heck, the Lundins own a piece of just about every natural resource known to man (although conspicuously no diamond company).
Now when I was doing my search on UIC, I came upon this link ( http://www.antenna.nl/wise/uranium/uciuc.html ) where I noticed that their US office was headquarted in Colorado. Hmmmm. Not far from Nevada. Wouldn't that be a coincidence if they too filed some kind of corporate articles at the same time as De Beers. So I checked the Nevada corporate listings and unfortunately found nothing. But thinking maybe they filed in the state they are headquartered in, I went ahead and checked Colorado. I did a search for Lundin. I pulled up Lundin Investments LLC. Articled filed on June 10, 2004. 2 weeks after De Beers filed in Nevada. One week after Roger joined CMKX.
What do I see? I see that outside of Rick Walker, the man apparently second in command among our Canadian JV partners is Rick Kusmirski. A former Cameco bigwig who happens to have the president of one of Lundin's corporations on his board of directors at his other Uranium project, JNR Resources. I guess what will be debated is whether you think this is a strong link or not. My personal opinion is that if our property is rich in uranium, oil/gas, and any other precious metals or resources, Mr. Kusmirski has some connections that will not only know it, but will be very interested in it. I also personally question how some are dismissing TDEM and the Goldak survey as simply "informing us that we have kimberlite". If that's all that did, IMO, why would we waste our money on such an advanced, state of the art survey. That post I put up the other day about TDEM was enlightening. I think they know a lot more from our property than the fact that we just have some cool looking kimberlites. There are some people in fact that beleive with TDEM (thus possibly the importance of THAT release), we may know EXACTLY what we have and EXACTLY where it is and EXACTLY how much of it is there. That is all debatable and I don't doubt for a spit-second that TSXMiner and all the bashers will jump on this assumption immediately. But that's fine. I just raise it as a talking point for everyone. Do some research into TDEM and its capabilities. I know some people that have. I have my opinions. Maybe you'll have yours.
Again, the above is all for your digestion. Everything is public. And maybe some bright people here will find new connections from the above that I completely missed that make this evidence stronger. Again, for all I know, Urban and CMKX have never contacted or been contacted by Cameco or UIC or any of the Lundins. Given the above, however, if we have uranium, oil/gas and more, I'd be very surprised if Mr. Kusmirski didn't facilitate an introduction for us.
Perhaps there's a lot more going down in Canada this week with Roger's attendance than anyone suspects. Perhaps our Canadian JVs were underestimated in their importance. I know TSX Miner is of the opinion that "Mr. Kusmirski hates Urban." That's fine. That's his opinion. And frankly TSXMiner has seemed like the most objective set of eyes on this board (personally I still say he is a pure basher with his recent concession to our kimberlite as trying to make him seem a more credible basher). Plus, even if Mr. Kusmirski didn't care for Urban, money is a powerful motivator to set aside differences. I admit to not knowing the mining community up there but I certainly would never take TSX Miner's commentary on that relationship as having much worth. Just my opinion on that.
What is happening with our JVs? Time will tell. Did I hit any real, relevant connections above? Time will tell. I am sharing all this info as food for thought as we get deeper and deeper into this mystery novel.
For tonight, I post this for you to consider. I will not be responding to any replies. Debate amongst yourselves. I already have my opinions. I am sticking to my belief that extensive posting is no longer relevant here. So this is my one post today. It is not about a company PR but it is what I considered relevant enough to merit posting. I hope it was helpful. Catch you tomorrow.
Z
As always, these are my personal opinions.
Hopefully nobody in here is investing anything but "fun" money that they can afford to gamble with.
Posts: 2 | From: Noblesville, IN | Registered: Oct 2004
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by dwman: I know someone posted the MM codes a day or two ago but I don't want to search for them. I saw L2 of 300. Is that the one that says "I need shares. Take the price down."?
Yes dw, that is the signal for 'take the price down'
Posts: 2 | From: Noblesville, IN | Registered: Oct 2004
| IP: Logged |
Featuring the Jeff Arend funny car on the outside and at no extra charge on the inside a THERMOS......WITH Holographic images of the singing & dancing MELVIN
The CMKXTREME LUNCHBOX is available exclusively using your CMKXTREME VISA Pre-Paid Stored Value Card
BUT WAIT THERES MORE
Stay glued to your computer monitors for future P/R's announcing:
The STERLING & MELVIN Talking action figures....
Hear STERLING say..."ALL IS WELL"..."ALL IS BETTER THAN WELL"..."YES I DID SAY INFINITE VALUE THEORY"... and "YOU HEARD ME I SAID DOUBLE SHORT DOUBLE COVER"
Hear MELVIN O'NEIL in a question & answer session saying..."YUP"..."COULD BE"..."TO DA MOON"... and that alltime favorite..."DON'T STOP THINKIN ABOUT TOMORROW"
IN future releases CMKM Diamonds will also bring you
The CMKM STOCK CERTIFICATE TOILET PAPER These will be available at a price of $ 0.0004 per sheet
Order early because only 483 billion sheets will be printed
Well maybe only 40 billion, we haven't decided yet....
REMEMBER...IF YOU DON'T SEE IT IN A PR DON'T BELIEVE IT....
sorry guys I was bored...or was it board bored
Russ
Posts: 2 | From: Noblesville, IN | Registered: Oct 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
How many of you guys think this credit card you have been talking about would be a good thing? Sorry if I missed earlier info, broke a finger, thus making puter use kind of hard! Wallace, I said a prayer for you! Posts: 622 | From: USA | Registered: Aug 2004
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Kate: How many of you guys think this credit card you have been talking about would be a good thing? Sorry if I missed earlier info, broke a finger, thus making puter use kind of hard! Wallace, I said a prayer for you!
The responses you should get re: the value card should range from good, bad to indifferent. Some will say it's a good marketing tool and "possible" mechanism for dividend distributions. While others say it's waste of time and energy that UC should be spending finding diamonds and generally doing things to increase shareholder value.
I myself am pretty indifferent about it. I don't think it's a bad thing at all however. I don't disagree with the fact that it's probably a good and cheap marketing ploy but at this point I fail to see how it will translate into increased value to the company in the short term. Long term it's probably not a bad item to attach your company name to. JMHO
[This message has been edited by Brad (edited August 12, 2004).]
quote:Originally posted by Kate: How many of you guys think this credit card you have been talking about would be a good thing? Sorry if I missed earlier info, broke a finger, thus making puter use kind of hard! Wallace, I said a prayer for you!
Kate, I don't think it can hurt us publicity wise, but all the hype about using it for dividends, squeezing MM's, etc. is all products of idle minds. And of course, the by-product of profit to CMKX is good. I'll probably get one myself, but just for a souvenir to pass on to the grandkids.
Posts: 2 | From: Noblesville, IN | Registered: Oct 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
Kate, if the card PR is legit, I kinda like the idea. My funds are in an IRA and not taxed until I take a distribution. With the reloadable card, I can fill it up as needed. Sort of like a gas station. Posts: 1005 | From: Grapevine, TX 76051 | Registered: Aug 2004
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by dwman: Kate, if the card PR is legit, I kinda like the idea. My funds are in an IRA and not taxed until I take a distribution. With the reloadable card, I can fill it up as needed. Sort of like a gas station.
There's no question in mind anymore that it's legit since Melvin confirmed it last night on Paltalk. However, I'm inclined to believe he had nothing to do with it's creation and release. He even stated something to that effect.
Topic Closed
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
Printer-friendly view of this topic
...Still long and strong
