posted
AFTER ALL THE E-MAIL PROBLEMS I HAVE HAD. I AM NOT GOING TO E-MAIL ANYONE PERSONALLY. SORRY--BUT WOULD BE GLAD TO ANSWER WHAT I CAN ON THIS BOARD.
LETS HAVE A GREAT DAY. GOOD DD FOLKS. I KNOW YOU ARE ALL SICK OF THE POTENTIAL IS PRICELESS B.S.--BUT I DO BELIEVE IT.
posted
You see how Maug exploded on good news today, that is a prime example on how QBID will explode once they release this joint pr on carriers, forget going to 5 and 10 cents, we going to the moon with that news. Maug is a dayumm good example of what good news will do for a stock.
IP: Logged |
posted
Good morning. Dead out there today. Everything down at once. My initial investment is showing. Hope I don't hafta do something drastic, like protect it.
IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Bialystock: Good morning. Dead out there today. Everything down at once. My initial investment is showing. Hope I don't hafta do something drastic, like protect it.
I HAD NO CHOICE BUT TO DIVERSIFY SOMESHAT. TOO MUCH RAPPED IN ONE STOCK. BREAKING RULE # ONE. STILL FIRMLY BELIEVE IN QBID. JUST HAVE TO TAKE PROFITS A SPREAD AROUND.
LOADED UP ON GZFX. I HAVE FAITH IN THAT COMPANY. BEEN IN SINCE OCT OF 2003. THEY ARE STRUGGLING THRU THE NEW COMPANY SYNDROM. I BELIEVE THEY WILL PULL THRU. CEO HAS A GRIP. LOL IMHO
posted
I agree with you Diana about GZFX. I sold out for a small profit before this dip, luckily, but I would buy in again at these levels if I had some liquid cash. Also, I am a customer of theirs as well, and they still have some service issues I'm not happy with. Nothing drastic, but certainly some recurring problems that are affecting my opinion of them for now. Once ironed out (I believe they will eventually) I'll get in again.
I see we are past the "buy the rumor" stage with Qbid, otherwise that streaming video page that was posted last night would've at least gotten us a blip. Hopefully people don't "sell the news" from these levels then, or I'm screwed.
posted
Everyone remember the duplicate PRs on Monday? QBID's PR was identical to LBTT's, except for their respective company details. Well, I guess we were hoping that it had to do with some coalition that was forming against the evil MMs.
So I emailed LBTT Monday, and just received a reply:
Dear Rich:
Clearly the mgt. of QBID did not want to be very original or creative and simply "knocked off" our press release for their own use.
In that these are not copyrighted, there is nothing LBTT can do about it.
Anyway, thanks for your email and I appreciate your concern, and for your support in LBTT.
quote:Originally posted by WinsumLosesum: Everyone remember the duplicate PRs on Monday? QBID's PR was identical to LBTT's, except for their respective company details. Well, I guess we were hoping that it had to do with some coalition that was forming against the evil MMs.
So I emailed LBTT Monday, and just received a reply:
Dear Rich:
Clearly the mgt. of QBID did not want to be very original or creative and simply "knocked off" our press release for their own use.
In that these are not copyrighted, there is nothing LBTT can do about it.
Anyway, thanks for your email and I appreciate your concern, and for your support in LBTT.
Best wishes,
James Stock IR for LBTT
Stockenter@aol.com
Whoops.
[This message has been edited by kbpkt (edited July 14, 2004).]
quote:Originally posted by kbpkt: ..... Has anyone heard or asked about Q's response to this question?
I haven't asked, but I think I know the answer. "Due to blah blah blah, we can't release that info yet, but will have an update for you soon!" Bob_dog Why don't we have signed contracts?
quote:Originally posted by kbpkt: Ok, I'll take the QBID side for a minute. If I'm not mistaken, these PR's both came out on the same day around the same time. How would QBID have access to LBTT's PR and be able to issue an almost identical one simutaneously? Has anyone heard or asked about Q's response to this question?
My mistake, LBTT issued their PR on May 10, QBID was this past Monday. Ok, QBID looks pretty bad in this one.
quote:Originally posted by kbpkt: Ok, I'll take the QBID side for a minute. If I'm not mistaken, these PR's both came out on the same day around the same time. How would QBID have access to LBTT's PR and be able to issue an almost identical one simutaneously? Has anyone heard or asked about Q's response to this question?
quote:Originally posted by realityinc21: I HAD NO CHOICE BUT TO DIVERSIFY SOMESHAT. TOO MUCH RAPPED IN ONE STOCK. BREAKING RULE # ONE. STILL FIRMLY BELIEVE IN QBID. JUST HAVE TO TAKE PROFITS A SPREAD AROUND.
LOADED UP ON GZFX. I HAVE FAITH IN THAT COMPANY. BEEN IN SINCE OCT OF 2003. THEY ARE STRUGGLING THRU THE NEW COMPANY SYNDROM. I BELIEVE THEY WILL PULL THRU. CEO HAS A GRIP. LOL IMHO
I like GZFX too. Bought more last week & again today! Also holding ONEV.
If QBID can just get one carrier I believe we will see a run that will make last Spring look weak!
posted
If I'm not mistaking, I remember reading that press release via LBTT at least a month ago.
dz
/
quote:Originally posted by kbpkt: Ok, I'll take the QBID side for a minute. If I'm not mistaken, these PR's both came out on the same day around the same time. How would QBID have access to LBTT's PR and be able to issue an almost identical one simutaneously? Has anyone heard or asked about Q's response to this question?
[This message has been edited by denzen (edited July 14, 2004).]
posted
All questions are to be emailed. I just called the regular phone number and the guy said he can not answer any questions (I identified myself as a shareholder within three seconds of him saying 'hello')and that all questions should be sent to info@qtelevision.com
The phone call then pretty much ended. He sounded busy and almost like he has taken ALOT of calls today, not annoyed, just busy.
quote:Originally posted by WinsumLosesum: Everyone remember the duplicate PRs on Monday? QBID's PR was identical to LBTT's, except for their respective company details. Well, I guess we were hoping that it had to do with some coalition that was forming against the evil MMs.
So I emailed LBTT Monday, and just received a reply:
Dear Rich:
Clearly the mgt. of QBID did not want to be very original or creative and simply "knocked off" our press release for their own use.
In that these are not copyrighted, there is nothing LBTT can do about it.
Anyway, thanks for your email and I appreciate your concern, and for your support in LBTT.
Best wishes,
James Stock IR for LBTT
Stockenter@aol.com
THANKS FOR INFO. SEEMS ODD TO JUST COPY FROM ANOTHER PR. NOT TO SMART!!
----------------------------------------- I thought the same about the form letters, which would make sense. However read the part about 'FUNDING' It is identical... I don't know,lol...
posted
isn't it ALL MMM? they do whatever the he|| they want. They're just shakin it up to get some action. since people seem very reluctant to sell, up was the best way to go.
IP: Logged |
posted
I would love to hear what Frank or someone at Q will have to say about LBTT's response.....Definetly not what we wanted to hear....."Frank...you got some explaining to do!"
quote:Originally posted by WinsumLosesum: Everyone remember the duplicate PRs on Monday? QBID's PR was identical to LBTT's, except for their respective company details. Well, I guess we were hoping that it had to do with some coalition that was forming against the evil MMs.
So I emailed LBTT Monday, and just received a reply:
Dear Rich:
Clearly the mgt. of QBID did not want to be very original or creative and simply "knocked off" our press release for their own use.
In that these are not copyrighted, there is nothing LBTT can do about it.
Anyway, thanks for your email and I appreciate your concern, and for your support in LBTT.
Topic Closed
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
Printer-friendly view of this topic
It was his first Qbid buy, infact first pink sheet,lol. 
