posted
This morning I emailed Kendra Van Nostran at Deveney to inquire about upcoming PRs. I let everyone know what I hear, but I expect it will not be shocking.
Posts: 1885 | From: Tampa, FL, US | Registered: Mar 2004
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by pharmdman: This morning I emailed Kendra Van Nostran at Deveney to inquire about upcoming PRs. I let everyone know what I hear, but I expect it will not be shocking.
GOOD MORNING ALL,
BOUT TIME FOR THIS THING TO TURN AROUND. YAAA THINK
MALLOY--YOU HAD POSTED A WHILE BACK THE STEPS AND PROCESS IT TAKES TO MAKE A TV NETWORK. COULD YOU POST THAT AGAIN.
THANKS.
I AM HOPING THAT NO NEWS IS GOOD NEWS. THEY ARE WORKING AND NEGOCIATING. THE CONCEPT OF Q TELEVISON NETWORK IS STILL IMHO A GREAT MOVE AND POLITICALLY AND EMOTIONALLY OUR SOCIETY IS READY. THEY ARE ADDING TO STAFF. EVEN THO ONE QUY IS A MAJOR CROOK--I GUESS HE IS GOOD AT LAUNCHING TV NETWORKS. LOL
I HOPE FRANK CAN GET THE JOB DONE.
------------------ DIANA
[This message has been edited by realityinc21 (edited July 08, 2004).]
posted
PR WILL COME OUT SOON. It will be promising. TRUST ME!!!!! QTV WILL LAUNCH. THE PRICE KEEPS DROPPING BECAUSE PEOPLE ARE WAITING FOR THE PR TO COME OUT. DON'T GET NERVIOUS. I HAVE A INSIDE TRACK ON WHAT THE DEAL IS ABOUT QTV.
Posts: 171 | From: Brooklyn,ny,usa | Registered: Feb 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
sarki316....just curious you just posted in the cmkx threat saying you had some good info telling someone not to worry...you knew a pr was coming and that it was good...any other stocks that you have inside info on? Posts: 3651 | From: Algonac, MI. 48001 | Registered: Jun 2004
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by sarki316: PR WILL COME OUT SOON. It will be promising. TRUST ME!!!!! QTV WILL LAUNCH. THE PRICE KEEPS DROPPING BECAUSE PEOPLE ARE WAITING FOR THE PR TO COME OUT. DON'T GET NERVIOUS. I HAVE A INSIDE TRACK ON WHAT THE DEAL IS ABOUT QTV.
Sarki, enough of your BS. If you have facts, state them and show your DD. But stop your senseless pumping of this stock. At least the other pumpers state some type of reason with their posts. Go back over to the CMKX board and pump over there.
Posts: 1120 | From: San Diego, CA | Registered: Feb 2000
| IP: Logged |
posted
kb, relax! That would be called inside info and would be considered illegal. I guess some are smarter then you are.
Think before you post.
quote:Originally posted by kbpkt: Sarki, enough of your BS. If you have facts, state them and show your DD. But stop your senseless pumping of this stock. At least the other pumpers state some type of reason with their posts. Go back over to the CMKX board and pump over there.
quote:Originally posted by 1BigTip: kb, relax! That would be called inside info and would be considered illegal. I guess some are smarter then you are.
Think before you post.
It would only be inside info if he was on the inside and actually had info. Which I'm guessing is neither. 1BT I appreciate your DD, especially the Q 3 years ago thread, so I know you're a smart guy. Sarki's posts are always ignorant. Look back at any of them. They are always blank statements with no factual backing. I would get on a bashers case if they posted in the same manner.
Posts: 1120 | From: San Diego, CA | Registered: Feb 2000
| IP: Logged |
posted
kb, no hard feelings. Lets just wait for that PR. Looks like a nice turnaround coming.. Last Thursday we closed positive.
quote:Originally posted by kbpkt: It would only be inside info if he was on the inside and actually had info. Which I'm guessing is neither. 1BT I appreciate your DD, especially the Q 3 years ago thread, so I know you're a smart guy. Sarki's posts are always ignorant. Look back at any of them. They are always blank statements with no factual backing. I would get on a bashers case if they posted in the same manner.
posted
Anyone else having trouble refreshing Q website? Hoping my inability to load it means it is transitioning to updated version...need help to verify. I tried 2 browsers and my connection is fine (as witnessed by this post, lol) Someone else please give it a try?
Posts: 519 | From: Oakland, CA, USA | Registered: Mar 2004
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Bialystock: Anyone else having trouble refreshing Q website? Hoping my inability to load it means it is transitioning to updated version...need help to verify. I tried 2 browsers and my connection is fine (as witnessed by this post, lol) Someone else please give it a try?
It doesn't come up for me either, and it doesn't ping! Let's hope an update's on the way!
Posts: 1885 | From: Tampa, FL, US | Registered: Mar 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
Wouldn't be considered insider info if he/she overheard the info in like a grocery store or thru some medium.
Posts: 58 | From: petersburg, VA, USA | Registered: Jan 2004
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Bialystock: [B]Anyone else having trouble refreshing Q website? B]
Nope, looks like I cannot bring up the site either. Hmmm, I've been sitting with my finger on the buy button to accumulate and this might be my signal. Do I feel lucky today?
D, thanks for the posts today, good attitude
Posts: 58 | From: Oceanside, CA USA | Registered: May 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
The RSI is a reasonably simple model that anyone can use. It is calculated with the following formula. (Don't worry, most likely, you will never have to do this manually).
RSI = 100 - [100/(1 + RS)]
where: RS = (Avg. of n-day up closes)/(Avg. of n-day down closes) n= days (most analysts use 9 - 15 day RSI)
The RSI ranges from 0 to 100. A stock is considered overbought around the 70 level and you should consider selling. This number is not written in stone, in a bull market some believe that 80 is a better level to indicate an overbought stock since stocks often trade at higher valuations during bull markets. Likewise, if the RSI approaches 30 a stock is considered oversold and you should consider buying. Again, make the adjustment to 20 in a bear market.
The shorter number of days used, the more volatile the RSI is and the more often it will hit extremes. A longer term RSI is more rolling, fluctuating a lot less. Different sectors and industries have varying threshold levels when it comes to the RSI. Stocks in some industries will go as high as 75-80 before dropping back and others have a tough time breaking past 70. A good rule is to watch the RSI over the long term (1 year or more) to determine what level the historical RSI has traded at and how the stock reacted when it reached those levels.
posted
Hi Diana, chop off the word network, you were trying the wrong site. That "under construction" site has been sitting like that for months. cheers.
Posts: 519 | From: Oakland, CA, USA | Registered: Mar 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
Site is back on line but I do not see any changes ? Am I missing something ? Posts: 58 | From: Oceanside, CA USA | Registered: May 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
Thanks 1BigTip. I think I understand. Does RSI still come into play when faced with human emotion? (like QBID tanking?)
Posts: 395 | From: Grand Rapids MI 49546 | Registered: Feb 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
No, the site is back up again and with no changes. Just a big tease (or a technical glich). I saw it reported down on "i hub" too, so I know I'm not crazy. Well, not in that way. Cheers.
Posts: 519 | From: Oakland, CA, USA | Registered: Mar 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
Hotline says another update very soon, stay tuned. Does anyone know how long that message has been on there? I haven't checked it in a couple of weeks, thanks.