quote:Originally posted by Ironman64: For those that believe, there are plenty of you, I have heard from you privately....hang in there and continue to keep the faith. It will be rewarded.
Just wondering if any lawyer or court would be willing to listen to any case that RuPaul proposes in regards to "illegal naked-short selling" of shares in "his" company?
I would think that most lawyers, judges would think this guy is nuts from the get go, due to his previous actions. Any case that he would try to bring up, especially against accredited institutions, would more than likely be thrown out of court.
quote:Originally posted by Ironman64: For those that believe, there are plenty of you, I have heard from you privately....hang in there and continue to keep the faith. It will be rewarded.
Just wondering if any lawyer or court would be willing to listen to any case that RuPaul proposes in regards to "illegal naked-short selling" of shares in "his" company?
I would think that most lawyers, judges would think this guy is nuts from the get go, due to his previous actions. Any case that he would try to bring up, especially against accredited institutions, would more than likely be thrown out of court.
I don't know about any other court, but the Federal Court of Judge Cooper has had this case for a very long time and the Judge does not appear to have deemed Mr. Harris "nuts", nor has the Judge thrown the case out of court.
IP: Logged |
posted
I appologize to you bbb, as I believe that I hit a nerve with you. You are entitled to your opinion as well. I believed that Harris was nuts from the git go, well, since I heard some of his first pieces on internet radio anyhow.
What is the case number? How long has the case been sitting in front of him, and what has been done with it since in front of him?
I am trying to get a quick update, so I don't have to re-read almost two years of posts. I will research a tad as the case number is provided.
quote:Originally posted by Peaser: I appologize to you bbb, as I believe that I hit a nerve with you. You are entitled to your opinion as well. I believed that Harris was nuts from the git go, well, since I heard some of his first pieces on internet radio anyhow.
What is the case number? How long has the case been sitting in front of him, and what has been done with it since in front of him?
I am trying to get a quick update, so I don't have to re-read almost two years of posts. I will research a tad as the case number is provided.
No need to apologize to me. You didn't hit a nerve. The case No. is 1:06-cv-2568-cc.
IP: Logged |
The other question that research should hopefully answer is when was this case sent to this court. Also, what cases are having their day in court this week and when were these cases submitted?
Don't laugh...200 x 6 (the 6 for 1) is 1,200 x $15.00 is $18,000. That will learn you to remember ta put your sells in as limit orders and not market orders.
I can hear old Rufus now..."You sir are an idiot".
quote:Originally posted by wallymac: I'd say we play them all but when posting you need to qualify whether it's a DT, ST or position play.
Doesn't have to be pennies. With the current market there is money to be made on the bigger boards as well.
I've recently done well with UBET and the MVSN/GMST merger.
Oh, I thought you meant more like an "investment club" (but *not* a secret front-loaded deal), in which everybody brings candidates then we narrow it down to one or two, after full discussion.
In fact, to even discuss it more, we should have a new thread, as this is decidedly not CSHD discussion, even though related by virtue of all of us in-laws and outlaws
Suggestions, anyone?
"Trial by Fire Club" ?
"No Kool Aide Club" ?
"Been There, Lost the T-Shirt" ?
whatever, I like your idea, Wally...
-------------------- Nashoba Holba Chepulechi Adventures in microcapitalism...
IP: Logged |
quote:How about we all get together and find some winner's. Start on oldtimer's pick thread and make some money. A year or 2 ago we were all posting and everyone gave their opinion, good bad or indifferent. I say let's revive our assembly. Glass, Tex and Pcola have stuck it out let's jooin in and make it a group effort.
What do you all say?
-------------------- Nashoba Holba Chepulechi Adventures in microcapitalism...
IP: Logged |
There should be a set of guidelines as well to even be able to mention a stock on the board.
The stock pick should get yanked if certain criteria isn't met when listing.
Some things to consider:
Current pps, debt, cash on hand, shares being shorted. O/S, A/S + Float from the past 5 10K's. Institutions holding shares + % held, Any buy, sell, or hold recomendations and who is making the recomendation. P/E ratio.
There's a bunch more stuff to consider as well. I just wanted to add some of the major things that I look for when investing.
posted
I think we should open the thread and open discussion as to what parameters we need to look for.
Since it will be a on public board for discussion., not for front loading since the chart should tells us if that is happening hopefully we will get genuine discussion and people using their various areas of expertise such as Charting, DD and logical thinking.
We have a wealth of knowledge if it's used properly.
Call it anything you want. I propose calling it: The Stock Rating Club and rating the stocks discussed by virtue of 1 to 5 star by the members of the forum.
IP: Logged |
posted
Absolutely. I prefer finding undervalued big boards, but I occasionally look at undervalued OTCBB's that meet certain criteria of mine, some of which I hinted on above.
quote:Originally posted by bbbmine: The case No. is 1:06-cv-2568-cc.
Geez, you guys coulda stopped me from wasting my time looking at this...
Seems like the verdict is already in on this case number. RuPaul did it to the shareholders again, he defaulted on the case due to not having any burden of proof to support his argument.
The 'ole they stole the proof from me line...
I'll never forget those interviews on internet radio...
What's next for RuPaul, the USSC District Courts? Good Luck.
quote:Originally posted by bbbmine: The case No. is 1:06-cv-2568-cc.
Geez, you guys coulda stopped me from wasting my time looking at this...
Seems like the verdict is already in on this case number. RuPaul did it to the shareholders again, he defaulted on the case due to not having any burden of proof to support his argument.
The 'ole they stole the proof from me line...
I'll never forget those interviews on internet radio...
What's next for RuPaul, the USSC District Courts? Good Luck.
that's my problem with it all Peaz, i don't think there is another stop, i think the SEC is happy to have it sit the way it is...
it was dead the day Rufufu showed up without a lawyer. why he did that doesn't matter to the court. maybe it should since there are shareholders involved, but it was up to the shareholders to file a timely plea on their behalf, and none of the major shareholders did that..
the fact that they did not should tell us something... something like they wanted it to end with Rufufu too... if you had 100 grand tied up in this? wouldn't you have filed as an intervenor? i would have...
it's what you expect from a CEO that bounces CO checks to buy sweetfeed for his horses
-------------------- Don't envy the happiness of those who live in a fool's paradise.
IP: Logged |
The law is the law. Not everything that is done is the correct thing, in my eyes, as some crimes are frowned upon more heavily by society; however, the law is the law, and as long as it's consistent, so to speak, it will remain...
Back to the shareholders... Hypothetically speaking, if I was in on the ground floor and made millions on this stock scam, I would be willing to part with $100,000 to let it fade into undiscovered, and unproven history.
posted
Hypothetically speaking, if I was in on the ground floor and made millions on this stock scam, I would be willing to part with $100,000 to let it fade into undiscovered, and unproven history.
dead on.... which is why, even tho they have a few (very few) valid points the Rufufu supporters cling to the straws... ( i feel sorry for 'em)
Rufufu is obviously broke and maybe even broken, but his "partners" aren't... set up like a bowlin' pin, knocked down, and set up again
-------------------- Don't envy the happiness of those who live in a fool's paradise.
IP: Logged |
posted
Back to internet radio: I remember back when RuPaul was mentioning for folks to bet the farm. If they lost a dime, he'd personally pay it back. Like that one "lady" that mentioned she bet her life savings on RuPaul, $10K or something like that. It was my belief from the beginning that this "lady" caller was just part of the set-up.
Now, since he was so confident in this, were his belongings all tied up in this stock?
Did he file for bankruptcy recently or will he?
If not, then it is my belief that RuPaul is not crazy, and knew exactly what was going down.
posted
other people are more familiar with his assets than me, last i heard? he couldn't even feed his horses, which to MY way of thinking is dead broke, i couldn't live with myself if i was starving animals to death, but who knows what his gig is...
-------------------- Don't envy the happiness of those who live in a fool's paradise.
IP: Logged |
I would like to know if these people have actually seen his horses, or are they taking his word for it, just as in the past? Horses can eat only so much hay...
posted
they were taken by the local humane society, at least one died in their care. that was all on the news... Rufufu blamed it on persecution of course.. as best i could tell? he didn't own his house, or the land he was living on with the horses, and it sounded like he didn't even have enough land for the number of horses had... so he had to be feeding constantly, he bounced co. checks to pay for expenses according to some insiders.
hey guys some others should be joining in to 'splain better here, i am way outa date on all the latest...
-------------------- Don't envy the happiness of those who live in a fool's paradise.
IP: Logged |
posted
That's a decent summary. As i recall, he didn't want to talk about it at first, then somebody did some checking and found out about the confiscation. Then, of course, the "black helicopters"-style spin followed.
-------------------- Nashoba Holba Chepulechi Adventures in microcapitalism...
IP: Logged |
posted
Then, of course, the "black helicopters"-style spin followed.
and the "Burn Notice" tv show references which are pitiful...
i kinda like that show, but let's face facts, the CPA that audited the filing with the Venzuealan bonds included and caccklacked at face value got zapped by his state oversite board.. i lost track of the link to that.
in th every beginning? i "went on" the simple assumption that if somebody puts it in a filing and it's audited adn signed off on, then it's "good as gold".
of course we all know better, but what else can we base our investment strategies on if not the SEC filings?
that's why i am furious that the SEC is not following this all the way thru. even tho i traded to free shares (for the last time i might add) and took some profit? the SEC accpeted those filings at face value for months and EVERYTHING else is pure rumors. if we can't expect JAILTIME for lying on SEC documnets then the system is broken...
IMO? an SEC document should be considered the same as an affadavit filed in Federal court. what's the penalty for perjury?
-------------------- Don't envy the happiness of those who live in a fool's paradise.
IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Peaser: Back to internet radio: I remember back when RuPaul was mentioning for folks to bet the farm. If they lost a dime, he'd personally pay it back. Like that one "lady" that mentioned she bet her life savings on RuPaul, $10K or something like that. It was my belief from the beginning that this "lady" caller was just part of the set-up.
Now, since he was so confident in this, were his belongings all tied up in this stock?
Did he file for bankruptcy recently or will he?
If not, then it is my belief that RuPaul is not crazy, and knew exactly what was going down.
Man, who owns the movie rights to this cherade...
I think you are referring to TexasPrincess. She was the one Rufus made a personal promise to that her investment would make her money. There used to be a link with sound clips on it where you could listen to his promises to her, that link is now gone. Needless to say, she lost her money.
IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by glassman: Then, of course, the "black helicopters"-style spin followed.
and the "Burn Notice" tv show references which are pitiful...
i kinda like that show, but let's face facts, the CPA that audited the filing with the Venzuealan bonds included and caccklacked at face value got zapped by his state oversite board.. i lost track of the link to that.
in th every beginning? i "went on" the simple assumption that if somebody puts it in a filing and it's audited adn signed off on, then it's "good as gold".
of course we all know better, but what else can we base our investment strategies on if not the SEC filings?
that's why i am furious that the SEC is not following this all the way thru. even tho i traded to free shares (for the last time i might add) and took some profit? the SEC accpeted those filings at face value for months and EVERYTHING else is pure rumors. if we can't expect JAILTIME for lying on SEC documnets then the system is broken...
IMO? an SEC document should be considered the same as an affadavit filed in Federal court. what's the penalty for perjury?
"lost track" I thought I posted that on BCIT?
Anyway, ya...SEC questions filings alla time...used to be a market for 'em via a coupla companies that filed FOIA.
And, yeah...try lying on a 1040, or a Chapter 13, etc. ... Seems it should be the same, to me.
-------------------- Nashoba Holba Chepulechi Adventures in microcapitalism...
IP: Logged |