posted
One more time for best wishes being spread!.......To all the good folks and longs on the CSHD thread, may y'all have a tremendous turkey day and enjoy the good eats and fellowship of your families and friends during this holiday weekend!
-------------------- "No nation was ever ruined by trade." Benjamin Franklin Posts: 533 | From: Dooville, Indiana | Registered: Jul 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
This was a letter I received yesterday from a co-worker of mine. He is in the National Guard and deploys regularly to help keep this country safe. I thought the letter was great and wanted to share it with you guys. Happy Thanksgiving everyone.
-Spooky
----------------
As everyone leaves for the Thanksgiving holiday, I wanted to share a few thoughts with you. We are an extremely fortunate people in history. Perhaps we need to adjust our perspective on a regular basis. Here are some things I’ve thought of with my own griping.
I complain about my commute but I’m very thankful to have a job that I enjoy.
I complain about the yard work I have to do on weekends but I’m very thankful that I have a home that has a yard that needs work.
I complain about waiting in line to vote but I’m thankful that I get to vote.
I complain that “my guy” or “my party” didn’t do well in the election but I’m thankful that the system works, without a violent overthrow of the government.
I complain about the cost of gasoline but I’m thankful I own several cars that run (in spite of the one that broke down with Gigi and Holly last week).
I complain about the dastardly drive to get to the mountains on weekends for skiing but I’m thankful I have a job that pays for my gas and ski equipment and lift tickets and that I live in a state where a two to three hour drive is all that separates me from some of the best skiing in the world. I’m thankful that I’ve been able to ski some of those other resorts across the pond.
I complain that my knees hurt after a day of skiing but I’m thankful that I have two legs and two arms rather than one or more prosthetics as a result of a roadside bomb.
I complain about the cost of my utilities but I’m thankful I have light, heat and air-conditioning.
The list could go on and on but I think you get the idea.
I have been fortunate to have been able to visit a number of foreign countries. Some of these trips have been vacations and some have been as a guest of Uncle Sam. If you have never been to a third world country, you may not realize just how good we have it here. If you have any doubts, ask to see some of my pictures. Even the poorest among us live better than the average, or even well-to-do, citizen in many of these countries.
On this Thanksgiving, give thanks to your family and friends for their support. Thank your boss for his or her support, mentoring and patience. Thank your employees for the great job they do. Give thanks for your health, even if you have some problems. You are still here. You get up in the morning and come to work albeit with some aches and pains.
I want to thank all of you for your hard work, for your support during my deployments, and for your friendship.
Have a very happy Thanksgiving!!
Posts: 228 | From: Denver | Registered: Oct 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
Hope everyone had a safe and happy Thanksgiving. For once, I didn't eat too much...but I guess the day isn't over yet. I'm off to hit the desert again .
Posts: 1028 | From: Georgia | Registered: Jul 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
Hi guys - when everyone is back from enjoying turkey day (& I hope it was wonderful for all of you!) & wants to get back to business - Can someone explain this statement by Rufus to me?
As far as the filings are concerned he stated that we’re not a Bulletin Board. Are we out of NASDAQ requirements by not having filed it? Yes. But if you file it right now at this point in time, what the SEC’s next move would be is to automatically seize the company.
Why would they seize the company just for filing a 10q? Something doesn't add up for me......
Wouldn't they only seize the company if he filed a 10Q with ficticious statements? If,he doesn't plan on puting ficticious things in there what does he need to worry about?
I believe he has what he says he has, I really do, but this doesn't sound right & I think he's up to something & we don't have a clue what it is.....Perhaps not worried about the filing & then in turn no longer meeting the requirements for Nasdaq doesn't worry him due to a merger? I don't know but I don't understand why the SEC would seize it simply for filing, doesn't make sense....
So anyway, what do any of you think about this statement.....?
-------------------- ..just remember....Family is EVERYTHING!! Posts: 3944 | From: Rochester, NY | Registered: Sep 2006
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Jenna: Hi guys - when everyone is back from enjoying turkey day (& I hope it was wonderful for all of you!) & wants to get back to business - Can someone explain this statement by Rufus to me?
As far as the filings are concerned he stated that we’re not a Bulletin Board. Are we out of NASDAQ requirements by not having filed it? Yes. But if you file it right now at this point in time, what the SEC’s next move would be is to automatically seize the company.
Why would they seize the company just for filing a 10q? Something doesn't add up for me......
Wouldn't they only seize the company if he filed a 10Q with ficticious statements? If,he doesn't plan on puting ficticious things in there what does he need to worry about?
I believe he has what he says he has, I really do, but this doesn't sound right & I think he's up to something & we don't have a clue what it is.....Perhaps not worried about the filing & then in turn no longer meeting the requirements for Nasdaq doesn't worry him due to a merger? I don't know but I don't understand why the SEC would seize it simply for filing, doesn't make sense....
So anyway, what do any of you think about this statement.....?
I think that it is all BS stringing us along. Bottom line.
-------------------- Disclaimer: Not accountable for anything I say Posts: 6266 | Registered: Jun 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
Jenna, my guess is that if a 10Q is filed it would mention the Venezuela Caracas group 500 million bond that the SEC is at odds with and till they are satisfied with the ownership they will consider it more fraud for it to be mentioned. Thats my take on it. A second and third opinion is welcome too.
Posts: 957 | Registered: Jun 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
I hope everyone had a wonderful day with your families and friends. I hope you all were blessed with good food, good company, and good football (I know I was). When we went around the table at dinner time today, I took a large sip of my Sauvignon Blanc, and then I thanked my immediate family and my extended family (Allstocks) for being so supportive during the last few months. It has been a very tough year as we welcomed our beautiful new daughter into the world (she still aint sleeping through the night), we have moved, and we learned of a man named Rufus Paul Harris…a man that we will most likely never forget.
When I look back on things, I can’t for the life of me figure out just how we got here…where we are with this company and this battle between good and evil. It has been one hell of a ride and it’s not over yet.
I want to thank all of you for the part each and every one of you play in making this the best investment board out there. We all contribute in our own unique and crazy, yet valuable ways. We will get through this together. I truly believe that we will win this battle of good versus evil...it just may take some time. In the meantime, we have to remember to work together, respect each other, laugh and cry together, and most importantly, support each other by continuing to provide incredible DD and new information for each other. Each of us needs to continue to do our part to help us win this war. There is still work to be done.
In the meantime, please take this opportunity to enjoy your families, friends (and football) this holiday weekend. Let’s try to stay away from the boards so we can re-energize and hit it fresh first thing Monday morning. It may be time for a renewed assault on our elected officials so they know that we have not forgotten about the corruption that is being perpetrated upon our company and our families.
Take care everyone and I’ll see you on the other side.
Matthew
-------------------- "If you go the Extra Mile there will be no Traffic Jams".
St. Matthew Posts: 885 | From: Dallas, Texas | Registered: Sep 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
This is a very good question Jenna. I have been wrestling with this one for a couple of days. I have PM'd Tut and e-mailed Rufus himself about this. I have not heard back from either. Most likely, they can’t discuss this.
My guess is that the 10-Q contains the additional 4 billion in bonds and the 4 billion credit line. It would place the value of the company at close to 15 billion dollars. This would bring lots of attention to the company. The SEC does NOT want attention on THIS company.
What you have to remember here is that the SEC does not want to be exposed...not only for what they are currently doing (to CSHD), but for what they have been doing in the past. That is, allowing the Naked Shorts to conduct business for years under their watchful eye.
In my opinion, we are in this boat because of this and this alone. If not for this, we would be on NASDAQ and we would all be rich by now.
If this corruption is exposed, the SEC will have to be completely reorganized...if not shut down completely. The American public will most likely loose faith in the government who funds them. Enron gave the investment world a huge black eye...This has the potential to do far worse. If the truth about this gets out, the American public would loose faith in the idea of investing in stocks altogether. Billions (if not trillions) of dollars would shift (almost overnight) to interest bearing products.
The good Doctor can attest to what this would do to our economy. Why do you think the last recession was so bad? Besides the natural economic factors that caused the recession, we were forced to deal with 9/11 and then the Enron scandal. We are just now…6 years later, getting to the same levels of investment dollars in the stock market that we saw in 2000. The entire economy of this country is based on two basic things…corporate investment and disposable income on the part of the American public. If people are not investing in our companies and spending money on goods and services, our economy goes nowhere…fast!
If this is exposed (incorrectly) we will see ripple effects throughout our economy. That’s why I believe this may take awhile. Very powerful people will have to decide the best way to resolve this so that it is a win / win for everyone involved.
Another thing to consider is that the SEC does not want to be responsible for the downfall of Ameritrade. You can only imagine what would happen on the cable news channels if this happens. The cat…and all of their poop would be out of the bag.
As I said before…this aint over yet. As Rufus said…“That’s when the fun begins”.
quote:Originally posted by Jenna: Hi guys - when everyone is back from enjoying turkey day (& I hope it was wonderful for all of you!) & wants to get back to business - Can someone explain this statement by Rufus to me?
As far as the filings are concerned he stated that we’re not a Bulletin Board. Are we out of NASDAQ requirements by not having filed it? Yes. But if you file it right now at this point in time, what the SEC’s next move would be is to automatically seize the company.
Why would they seize the company just for filing a 10q? Something doesn't add up for me......
Wouldn't they only seize the company if he filed a 10Q with ficticious statements? If,he doesn't plan on puting ficticious things in there what does he need to worry about?
I believe he has what he says he has, I really do, but this doesn't sound right & I think he's up to something & we don't have a clue what it is.....Perhaps not worried about the filing & then in turn no longer meeting the requirements for Nasdaq doesn't worry him due to a merger? I don't know but I don't understand why the SEC would seize it simply for filing, doesn't make sense....
So anyway, what do any of you think about this statement.....?
-------------------- "If you go the Extra Mile there will be no Traffic Jams".
St. Matthew Posts: 885 | From: Dallas, Texas | Registered: Sep 2006
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by St. Matthew: This is a very good question Jenna. I have been wrestling with this one for a couple of days. I have PM'd Tut and e-mailed Rufus himself about this. I have not heard back from either. Most likely, they can’t discuss this.
My guess is that the 10-Q contains the additional 4 billion in bonds and the 4 billion credit line. It would place the value of the company at close to 15 billion dollars. This would bring lots of attention to the company. The SEC does NOT want attention on THIS company.
What you have to remember here is that the SEC does not want to be exposed...not only for what they are currently doing (to CSHD), but for what they have been doing in the past. That is, allowing the Naked Shorts to conduct business for years under their watchful eye.
In my opinion, we are in this boat because of this and this alone. If not for this, we would be on NASDAQ and we would all be rich by now.
If this corruption is exposed, the SEC will have to be completely reorganized...if not shut down completely. The American public will most likely loose faith in the government who funds them. Enron gave the investment world a huge black eye...This has the potential to do far worse. If the truth about this gets out, the American public would loose faith in the idea of investing in stocks altogether. Billions (if not trillions) of dollars would shift (almost overnight) to interest bearing products.
The good Doctor can attest to what this would do to our economy. Why do you think the last recession was so bad? Besides the natural economic factors that caused the recession, we were forced to deal with 9/11 and then the Enron scandal. We are just now…6 years later, getting to the same levels of investment dollars in the stock market that we saw in 2000. The entire economy of this country is based on two basic things…corporate investment and disposable income on the part of the American public. If people are not investing in our companies and spending money on goods and services, our economy goes nowhere…fast!
If this is exposed (incorrectly) we will see ripple effects throughout our economy. That’s why I believe this may take awhile. Very powerful people will have to decide the best way to resolve this so that it is a win / win for everyone involved.
Another thing to consider is that the SEC does not want to be responsible for the downfall of Ameritrade. You can only imagine what would happen on the cable news channels if this happens. The cat…and all of their poop would be out of the bag.
As I said before…this aint over yet. As Rufus said…“That’s when the fun begins”.
quote:Originally posted by Jenna: Hi guys - when everyone is back from enjoying turkey day (& I hope it was wonderful for all of you!) & wants to get back to business - Can someone explain this statement by Rufus to me?
As far as the filings are concerned he stated that we’re not a Bulletin Board. Are we out of NASDAQ requirements by not having filed it? Yes. But if you file it right now at this point in time, what the SEC’s next move would be is to automatically seize the company.
Why would they seize the company just for filing a 10q? Something doesn't add up for me......
Wouldn't they only seize the company if he filed a 10Q with ficticious statements? If,he doesn't plan on puting ficticious things in there what does he need to worry about?
I believe he has what he says he has, I really do, but this doesn't sound right & I think he's up to something & we don't have a clue what it is.....Perhaps not worried about the filing & then in turn no longer meeting the requirements for Nasdaq doesn't worry him due to a merger? I don't know but I don't understand why the SEC would seize it simply for filing, doesn't make sense....
So anyway, what do any of you think about this statement.....?
Very well written post, but I have to laugh. Don't you think that Rufus wants you to believe all that you wrote?
-------------------- Disclaimer: Not accountable for anything I say Posts: 6266 | Registered: Jun 2004
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by St. Matthew: This is a very good question Jenna. I have been wrestling with this one for a couple of days. I have PM'd Tut and e-mailed Rufus himself about this. I have not heard back from either. Most likely, they can’t discuss this.
My guess is that the 10-Q contains the additional 4 billion in bonds and the 4 billion credit line. It would place the value of the company at close to 15 billion dollars. This would bring lots of attention to the company. The SEC does NOT want attention on THIS company.
What you have to remember here is that the SEC does not want to be exposed...not only for what they are currently doing (to CSHD), but for what they have been doing in the past. That is, allowing the Naked Shorts to conduct business for years under their watchful eye.
In my opinion, we are in this boat because of this and this alone. If not for this, we would be on NASDAQ and we would all be rich by now.
If this corruption is exposed, the SEC will have to be completely reorganized...if not shut down completely. The American public will most likely loose faith in the government who funds them. Enron gave the investment world a huge black eye...This has the potential to do far worse. If the truth about this gets out, the American public would loose faith in the idea of investing in stocks altogether. Billions (if not trillions) of dollars would shift (almost overnight) to interest bearing products.
The good Doctor can attest to what this would do to our economy. Why do you think the last recession was so bad? Besides the natural economic factors that caused the recession, we were forced to deal with 9/11 and then the Enron scandal. We are just now…6 years later, getting to the same levels of investment dollars in the stock market that we saw in 2000. The entire economy of this country is based on two basic things…corporate investment and disposable income on the part of the American public. If people are not investing in our companies and spending money on goods and services, our economy goes nowhere…fast!
If this is exposed (incorrectly) we will see ripple effects throughout our economy. That’s why I believe this may take awhile. Very powerful people will have to decide the best way to resolve this so that it is a win / win for everyone involved.
Another thing to consider is that the SEC does not want to be responsible for the downfall of Ameritrade. You can only imagine what would happen on the cable news channels if this happens. The cat…and all of their poop would be out of the bag.
As I said before…this aint over yet. As Rufus said…“That’s when the fun begins”.
quote:Originally posted by Jenna: Hi guys - when everyone is back from enjoying turkey day (& I hope it was wonderful for all of you!) & wants to get back to business - Can someone explain this statement by Rufus to me?
As far as the filings are concerned he stated that we’re not a Bulletin Board. Are we out of NASDAQ requirements by not having filed it? Yes. But if you file it right now at this point in time, what the SEC’s next move would be is to automatically seize the company.
Why would they seize the company just for filing a 10q? Something doesn't add up for me......
Wouldn't they only seize the company if he filed a 10Q with ficticious statements? If,he doesn't plan on puting ficticious things in there what does he need to worry about?
I believe he has what he says he has, I really do, but this doesn't sound right & I think he's up to something & we don't have a clue what it is.....Perhaps not worried about the filing & then in turn no longer meeting the requirements for Nasdaq doesn't worry him due to a merger? I don't know but I don't understand why the SEC would seize it simply for filing, doesn't make sense....
So anyway, what do any of you think about this statement.....?
Jenna posts: "Why would they seize the company just for filing a 10q? Something doesn't add up for me......
Wouldn't they only seize the company if he filed a 10Q with ficticious statements?"
Jenna, SEC can't show up and "padlock" a company, like 'revenooers bustin' up a still... they can ask the courts to freeze assets, to satisfy disgorgment. Occassionally, they even seek emergency orders to freeze assets...
A recent legislative move has been to seek new legislation allowing the government to go after CEO assets (like, say, ENRON-type examples) along the lines of what they can do to drug-ring leaders--however, I don't know what progress has been made...
It could be that this "seize the company" idea is merely a rumor, or it could be that the CEO has no intention of filing and is floating this out as an excuse.
Seems like the first order of business would be to fight the default judgment. After all, if the filings show little or no assets, there's no point to a freeze. Yet, if the filings show all is well, why not use those considerable assets to fight the default judgment?
St. Matt posts: "The SEC does NOT want attention on THIS company."
Nonsensical: The swift, very public SEC suit is hardly the act of an agency wishing to keep its actions on the QT...
St. Matt adds: "If this corruption is exposed, the SEC will have to be completely reorganized...if not shut down completely. The American public will most likely loose faith in the government who funds them."
Hyperbole: Yes, the GAO has an inquiry underway, re SEC enforcement and compliance divisions--which may well lead to changes. A complete reorg is highly unlikely, and a shut down is unthinkable. As St. Matt goes on to allude, chaos and financial instability would result--ain't gonna happen.
However, despite the interest in trading circles, the chances of CSHD et al becoming a "household word" akin to ENRON et al is highly unlikely. Remember GLKC(E)? The one with the fella who supposedly had the certs for *all* free-trading shares stashed at home in a drawer? Even though the stock was still trading? Yup, he even appeared before a committee hearing on the Hill--yet, you'd be hard-pressed to find any non-trader who is familiar with the ticker...
At any rate, any asset "freeze" would be a due-process type thing, papers to be filed, hearings, etc... not some sort of "midnight raid on the company."
posted
My opinion is they have to get through the current debaccle with proving the assets. Publishing another filing with the same assets in question would allow the SEC to mobilize on them once again.
This was discussed in depth on HSM, some legal folks post on there as well. Its burried a million pages deep so its not easy to find again.
I am putting some cheap buys in and going golfing I should be back around 2. Jenna- pleae have ALL the answers including RPH favorite color.
Hope everyone had a good holiday- I think I had 2 plates piled HIGH with grub yesterday. I was hurting last night. Had to rush home and lay flat.
-------------------- Got CSHD? Its fun Posts: 766 | From: Washington, DC | Registered: Sep 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
Good morning board ... hope all had a nice Thanksgiving day! Guess we know where all the girls will be today ... out getting all those bargains! Have a good one all! Rufus, roll baby, roll!!
-------------------- ... make you're decisions only on you're own DD ... Posts: 348 | From: Arizona | Registered: Jul 2006
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by TexasMoney: Yes - that was a great story and he seems like a good kid.
quote:Originally posted by Jenna: Just curious - Has anybody heard of that kid "J-Mac"- he's the kid with autism that got put in the last few minutes of the last Basketball game of the year - his senior year & scored like 26 points in the last minute?
I was only bringing that up because that was my high school.....
sorry, I went way off topic there....Good Morning to you TM...
Disney contacted him there making a movie about him & Magic Johnson came to town he's going to direct it....
Ahh, no worry getting off topic on this thread. Everyone else does and stocks not going anywhere anytime soon.
Anyone seen Desperate Housewives? I have a buddy I used to play basketball with in high school and he is now "Austin", "Ede's" nephew on that show. Pretty cool, huh. LOL. And I kicked his butt one on one all the time.
-------------------- I buy fast and sell faster! Posts: 2018 | Registered: Jan 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
The Yahoo board says there are 23 million shares outstanding and a market cap around 3M (at .15). The CVSU site says there are 48 M shares and a market cap of 8.8M. Can anyone tell me where the difference in the number of shares outstanding comes from?
Posts: 75 | From: Rochester | Registered: Oct 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
Thank you Sir as your posts are always held in high regards with valuable information. It is much appreciated~!
Quote: Tex
Jenna posts: "Why would they seize the company just for filing a 10q? Something doesn't add up for me......
Wouldn't they only seize the company if he filed a 10Q with ficticious statements?"
Jenna, SEC can't show up and "padlock" a company, like 'revenooers bustin' up a still... they can ask the courts to freeze assets, to satisfy disgorgment. Occassionally, they even seek emergency orders to freeze assets...
A recent legislative move has been to seek new legislation allowing the government to go after CEO assets (like, say, ENRON-type examples) along the lines of what they can do to drug-ring leaders--however, I don't know what progress has been made...
It could be that this "seize the company" idea is merely a rumor, or it could be that the CEO has no intention of filing and is floating this out as an excuse.
Seems like the first order of business would be to fight the default judgment. After all, if the filings show little or no assets, there's no point to a freeze. Yet, if the filings show all is well, why not use those considerable assets to fight the default judgment?
St. Matt posts: "The SEC does NOT want attention on THIS company."
Nonsensical: The swift, very public SEC suit is hardly the act of an agency wishing to keep its actions on the QT...
St. Matt adds: "If this corruption is exposed, the SEC will have to be completely reorganized...if not shut down completely. The American public will most likely loose faith in the government who funds them."
Hyperbole: Yes, the GAO has an inquiry underway, re SEC enforcement and compliance divisions--which may well lead to changes. A complete reorg is highly unlikely, and a shut down is unthinkable. As St. Matt goes on to allude, chaos and financial instability would result--ain't gonna happen.
However, despite the interest in trading circles, the chances of CSHD et al becoming a "household word" akin to ENRON et al is highly unlikely. Remember GLKC(E)? The one with the fella who supposedly had the certs for *all* free-trading shares stashed at home in a drawer? Even though the stock was still trading? Yup, he even appeared before a committee hearing on the Hill--yet, you'd be hard-pressed to find any non-trader who is familiar with the ticker...
At any rate, any asset "freeze" would be a due-process type thing, papers to be filed, hearings, etc... not some sort of "midnight raid on the company."
-------------------- I buy fast and sell faster! Posts: 2018 | Registered: Jan 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
everyone who wants to know the resposibilities of shareholder committee go to cvsu.us and read the charters for the company and committee
Posts: 82 | Registered: Oct 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
I'm trying to find out what date Rufus was talking on SPR to that soldier "andrew" from over in IRAQ, if anyone can pm me the date, I would appreciate it.
Posts: 228 | From: Denver | Registered: Oct 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
At any rate, any asset "freeze" would be a due-process type thing, papers to be filed, hearings, etc... not some sort of "midnight raid on the company."
Either way it is'nt a process that we care to undergo. Thats the main issue is'nt it? I think so. I'd rather play it safe and get dug out of the present whole the KGB has created.
Posts: 957 | Registered: Jun 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
everyone who wants to know the resposibilities of shareholder committee go to cvsu.us and read the charters for the company and committee
Posts: 82 | Registered: Oct 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
everyone who wants to know the resposibilities of shareholder committee go to cvsu.us and read the charters for the company and committee
Posts: 82 | Registered: Oct 2006
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Spooky: I'm trying to find out what date Rufus was talking on SPR to that soldier "andrew" from over in IRAQ, if anyone can pm me the date, I would appreciate it.
It was a few days before 11/15 - that's the best I can do.
Posts: 551 | From: FL | Registered: Apr 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
Ya, I know it's the SEC, but it's easy to compare the dominating presumptuous tactics used to suspend a company just because they think they're right. Dictator ship crap in my opinion.
No your not making a lot of sense. But i don't claim to be a SEC attorney.
So you're speculating that Rufus is stalling, making a bad play, i'm not sure. What is it?
Posts: 957 | Registered: Jun 2006
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by 6digits: Ya, I know it's the SEC, but it's easy to compare the dominating presumptuous tactics used to suspend a company just because they think they're right. Dictator ship crap in my opinion.
No your not making a lot of sense. But i don't claim to be a SEC attorney.
So you're speculating that Rufus is stalling, making a bad play, i'm not sure. What is it?
lol, I don't claim anything...much less status re SEC attorney...
Let's back up--you posted, in response to my italic, your bold:
"At any rate, any asset "freeze" would be a due-process type thing, papers to be filed, hearings, etc... not some sort of "midnight raid on the company."
Either way it is'nt a process that we care to undergo. Thats the main issue is'nt it? I think so. I'd rather play it safe and get dug out of the present whole the KGB has created.
posted
I wouldn't say the SEC dug this whole- I think its clear that RPH dug it and started this entire thing (according to his own plan). Do I agree with the strategy? Not sure....I have to learn what the finish line is for him and this company. Some say he is going about this to get things out in the open in court. Others say he is flying by the seat of his pants.
Think about it- read all of the declarations. He ignored phone calls, promised faxes etc.. and never sent them. This was months ago, he was clearly blowing them off for specific reasons. At least in his own mind anyways.
Which way will this unfold? we shall see- I believe 12/4 is the next court date isn't it?
Why do I hold onto the shares? Because there is a reason why the judge did NOT honor the initial complaint from the SEC (only partial is in the order). This makes the risk vs reward a no-brainer.
Hope everyones having a good holiday weekend!
-------------------- Got CSHD? Its fun Posts: 766 | From: Washington, DC | Registered: Sep 2006
| IP: Logged |
Topic Closed
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
Printer-friendly view of this topic
![[Smile]](smile.gif)
![[Big Grin]](biggrin.gif)
.
