quote:Originally posted by Neptunetrader94: Yeah...why is everyone pissed at doctor...?
from what I gathered...He has a PHD in Economics, Threw $100,000 at CSHD, and then decided to ask the questions, but not directly.
Posts: 2321 | Registered: Aug 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
Sure, the board is hopping and then I show up and everyone screws. Nice....
-------------------- "I will smack you in the mouth, I'm Neil Diamond"- Will Ferrell Posts: 4190 | From: Rhode Island | Registered: Mar 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
I have done alot of research, I have followed this stock since it has been in its FHAL days, down at .15 a share. All the way up there has been speculation. I got in and out all the way up to $4. The question is do you think this all one big hype or is this really happening.
The way I see it is that if this tanks I could lose 50-60- up too 100% ! BUT if this thing takes off like how everything "seems" to be I could make 100-2000% or more who knows.
SO as we all have a little gambler in us, why wouldn't you take this bet? I have studied everything, unless this is a big scheme, we stand to make alot of money!
I am taking a big gamble and I put alot on them!
To me Rufus has done almost everything else to get ready for this moment. If it looks like a duck and sounds like a duck its a duck.
Now I could always be wrong, but unless i get proven wrong, I THINK THIS STOCK IS GETTING READY TO GO BIG!!
Posts: 57 | From: MD | Registered: Sep 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
The thing with this stock is: so many good investors could have made 1500% gain in the market within these 2 months rather than waiting here (say you bought in at a dollar and are waiting for it to get to 15). For instance, any skilled flipper could have already made 1500% in this stock on the numerous times it went from ~.60 to 1.20 and the gains we saw this week:
Put $100 in at .60 Sell $200 at 1.20 Put $200 in at .60 Sell $400 at 1.20 Put $400 in at .80 Sell $600 at 1.20 Put $600 in at $1.00 Sell ~$2400 at 3.99 (or whatever the high was a few days ago)
This gives ~2400% gain
There were many many more times the stock fluctuated since August than I listed here.
Sadly, many, like me, are bad at flipping and let our emotions screw us over by getting too greedy and/or letting panic set in.
Posts: 242 | Registered: Aug 2005
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Mr. CATIAEngineer: www.cvsu.us seems to be down currently. Maybe they are doing an update. Now im curious....yet still very sleeeeepy
Good evening all! Been a long weekend waiting for monday! Cat... I have the site as working fine. Nighty Night everyone
-------------------- learnin as I go. Posts: 582 | From: Iowa, Michigan, North Carolina, Israel | Registered: Jul 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
Yes, I wish I could buy at the days low and sell at the days high every day as well...LOL. Thats not a good trader, that would be a diety.
quote:Originally posted by Neptunetrader94: The thing with this stock is: so many good investors could have made 1500% gain in the market within these 2 months rather than waiting here (say you bought in at a dollar and are waiting for it to get to 15). For instance, any skilled flipper could have already made 1500% in this stock on the numerous times it went from ~.60 to 1.20 and the gains we saw this week:
Put $100 in at .60 Sell $200 at 1.20 Put $200 in at .60 Sell $400 at 1.20 Put $400 in at .80 Sell $600 at 1.20 Put $600 in at $1.00 Sell ~$2400 at 3.99 (or whatever the high was a few days ago)
This gives ~2400% gain
There were many many more times the stock fluctuated since August than I listed here.
Sadly, many, like me, are bad at flipping and let our emotions screw us over by getting too greedy and/or letting panic set in.
-------------------- "I will smack you in the mouth, I'm Neil Diamond"- Will Ferrell Posts: 4190 | From: Rhode Island | Registered: Mar 2006
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Neptunetrader94: It's o.k. Catia, I've been silently watching this, was in/out in august, got back in this week and am fine with some of the profits, but now I'm just frustrated....does anyone know of any profitable activites this company is involved in other than "bonds"? I mean, they had to somehow acquire the cash to purchase a bond, no?
Not sure about how they got the bonds... I think Rufus has freinds in High Places... As far as pofitable deals... Point Click Dream (Cash Cow), AISS, Amozon Log deal (Mike Alexander on Paltalk seemed to say that this is still gonna be big talking mucho billion dolla deals in a matter of so many years, Also there seems to be a big Oil something or other. I think Rufus said somewhere that everything they do they do it BIG. Oh also a big money deal is the company that will be making T-shirts on the whole drama with saying like "Got CSHD" or "Timothy Miles, you can keep Your Street I don't wanna live there anyway!" LOL I think Portman might accually be getting T's made up??? Maybe They could be a sub of CVSU??? Also think of the Billion dollar movie deal that we'll have Called "CSHD" Starring our very own Paula Patrice and other really good looking people! Okay I gotta get some sleep. Night! Ima
-------------------- learnin as I go. Posts: 582 | From: Iowa, Michigan, North Carolina, Israel | Registered: Jul 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
The point being that 1500% was not THAT difficult to come by for the extremely diligent and patient, and in my experience, that's what makes a great investor. My 2400% estimate didn't take into account the many more times the price fluctuated-sure, maybe you didnt buy at .60 and sell at 1.20, but there were may opportunities that could have yielded just as much profits.
Posts: 242 | Registered: Aug 2005
| IP: Logged |
Me personally, I gamble, that is what I do. I’m still holding on to my original share purchases 52k to be exact, and plan to hold right up until the end and some beyond. I new it was a gamble when I bought, and it still is, even though, I’m way a head right now. But the monies are unrealized until I take my chip off the table and cash in.
Could I lose big? Of course I could, will I? At this point know one truly know. The one thing I’ve done on this forum is read every page. if anything the Docotor has Done wrong, that is, he has not read the DD that has already been posted(as do many). Which many of us have seen, from some of the re-hatching of issue and concerns that have already been address, and seemly dismissed but tend to arise up again.
H**l, the people on this forum are so good, IMO, that any DD or concern I have gets addressed before I can even post or research the topic. Question answered or I’m steered to a site where I can find the answers for myself. Just read before you post.
All my chips are still on the table, the dice are still rolling and I will either hit it big or loose the lot. But, in the end it will be because of my own choices. I have no wife, no kids, I do own a decedent home and a nice car a dog (all of which I have not seen in about 18months) but other than that no real responsibilities. So I play on.
“YOU PAY YOUR MONEY AND YOU MAKE YOU CHOICE”
Posts: 46 | Registered: May 2006
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Neptunetrader94: It's o.k. Catia, I've been silently watching this, was in/out in august, got back in this week and am fine with some of the profits, but now I'm just frustrated....does anyone know of any profitable activites this company is involved in other than "bonds"? I mean, they had to somehow acquire the cash to purchase a bond, no?
Not sure about how they got the bonds... I think Rufus has freinds in High Places... As far as pofitable deals... Point Click Dream (Cash Cow), AISS, Amozon Log deal (Mike Alexander on Paltalk seemed to say that this is still gonna be big talking mucho billion dolla deals in a matter of so many years, Also there seems to be a big Oil something or other. I think Rufus said somewhere that everything they do they do it BIG. Oh also a big money deal is the company that will be making T-shirts on the whole drama with saying like "Got CSHD" or "Timothy Miles, you can keep Your Street I don't wanna live there anyway!" LOL I think Portman might accually be getting T's made up??? Maybe They could be a sub of CVSU??? Also think of the Billion dollar movie deal that we'll have Called "CSHD" Starring our very own Paula Patrice and other really good looking people! Okay I gotta get some sleep. Night! Ima
Bahh....let's throw pure speculation and deal with pure, unadultered DD here. Rufus has high friends? I couldn't find ANY info on a "Georgia Republican of the Year" award anywhere-did anyone else?
Posts: 242 | Registered: Aug 2005
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by glassman: sorry, stocktrader there i go again getting lazy in my posting....
i am only saying that CSHD is STILL on the SHO list as of last night...
that IMPLIES to me that somebody is still short...
i have seen no filings indicating that CSHD is diluting....
i have seen other co's doing it, but NOT CSHD...
and they DO file their intentions to dilute...
if you read the filings? you will see...
perfect example is ACTC but they are no longer on the SHO list... they were earlier this month... look at this filing they issued before they went on the SHO list: September 6, 2006
Prospectus Supplement No. 7 To Prospectus Dated April 13, 2006
of
ADVANCED CELL TECHNOLOGY, INC. Relating to
20,397,296 SHARES OF COMMON STOCK
This prospectus supplement supplements our prospectus dated April 13, 2006, relating to the sale by certain selling stockholders of up to 20,397,296 shares of common stock of Advanced Cell Technology, Inc. held by or issuable to the selling stockholders, as follows:
i little bit of reading can save you and ther est of US a lot of greif...
CSHD has no filings that i have seen indicating they are planning to issue more shares...
a good time to say good night
-------------------- All post are my opinion. Do your own DD. Who's clicking your buy/sell button!? Posts: 7800 | From: Virginia | Registered: May 2006
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by 10of13: You haven't been able to take a look at the bonds yet? So if you don't like 3 of the players and you never took a look at the bond info? why did you buy into this? as long as the info you give is honest and upfront...not sure why you would be given a hard time... and remember..LINKS work best with this board... (don't tell them but they are all alittle wierd here...no one will just take any ones word for it... )
It's too bad most of the people here who claim to have looked at the bond don't realize that Rufus doesn't own squat of it. Where in the world does the CEO of a penny stock get half a billion dollars to buy a bond in CASH when he's never led a profitable company to this day? Was it a magic act? Look at the list of owners of this bond, and explain that first.
You stated that you been in CSHD couple of month,but the truth is you're just another moronsss that does'nt due his DD.
Yes CSHD doesn't own the bonds,they just handle them. If you were smart enough to read the PR's, you would have read somewhere that they are in the business of ''ASSET MANAGEMENT". As in other words, they only handle the bonds and in return they get a management fee.
Posts: 158 | From: Phila,PA | Registered: Mar 2006
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Neptunetrader94: sorry, that's the M N 1 interview that sent the price from $1.60 to $1.00. I don't know how he could have missed mentioning the fact that most of the bond is BORROWED and not really his.
If the banks have part of the loan by "Hypothecation" as you say, then Rufus does not earn that portion of interest on the bond, thos companies do....
From wikipedia: The original use of the word hypothecation was for a pledge of property as collateral for a debt without transfer of possession to the party making the loan. The opposite arrangement is common with modern mortgages - the bank retains legal ownership of the property until the debt is paid off.
Key part here: "the bank retains legal ownership of the property until the debt is paid off."
Therefore, Rufus does not have a 500 million bond, he has a much smaller bond, the rest of the interest from it goes to the banks he borrowed from. As far as when he will be able to earn the full 500 million needed to own the entire bond...well....
Just in case you didn't have access to the 8KA that was filed yesterday, this should come as a surprise to you. If you already knew, as I suspect, you'll need to do better. Half truths and innuendo's don't work here nearly as well as they do on some other boards.
12. LONG-TERM INVESTMENTS IN GLOBAL BONDS
On March 15, 2006, the Company acquired full ownership of Global Bonds issued through the Republic of Venezuela with an issuance date of July 31, 1998 and a maturity date of August 15, 2018. The principal amount of the bonds is $500,000,000 USD with a fixed interest rate of 13.625%, computed on a semi-annual basis. The applicable identification codes are as follows: Common Code - 008975540; CUSIP - 922646AT1; & ISIN Code - US922646AT10. The first interest payment is due on August 8, 2006, in which interest receivable and revenue have been properly accrued, to the holders of the bonds (the Company).
The applicable Declaration Statement (ownership documentation) specifies the transfer of full ownership to the Company from Banco Central De Venezuela, the issuer of the bonds, and insures that the bonds are free and clear of any deductions, charges or fees assessed by the Government of Venezuela. The Certificate of Ownership also identifies the Company as the sole owner, with an effective date of ownership as of March 15, 2006. The ownership documentation has been properly recorded with the State of Georgia securing and perfecting the bonds.
posted
Nice try Neptune. This board isn't stupid buddy.
-------------------- "I will smack you in the mouth, I'm Neil Diamond"- Will Ferrell Posts: 4190 | From: Rhode Island | Registered: Mar 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
Ilove this board alot of smart investors im very new and learing alot. this board sticks to business with a little tounge and cheek yet takes no bull crap thanks to all who post GOOD USEFUL DD.
Posts: 83 | Registered: Mar 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
Lets break this down for all those strugging to grasp the basic concepts:
The bonds are not real/owned by CSHD?
On March 15, 2006, the Company acquired full ownership of Global Bonds issued through the Republic of Venezuela with an issuance date of July 31, 1998 and a maturity date of August 15, 2018. The principal amount of the bonds is $500,000,000 USD with a fixed interest rate of 13.625%, computed on a semi-annual basis. The applicable identification codes are as follows: Common Code - 008975540; CUSIP - 922646AT1; & ISIN Code - US922646AT10. The first interest payment is due on August 8, 2006, in which interest receivable and revenue have been properly accrued, to the holders of the bonds (the Company).
The financials are not audited?
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Directors and Stockholders of Conversion Solutions Holdings Corp.
We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of Conversion Solutions Holdings Corp. as of June 30, 2006 and the related statements of operations, and stockholders' equity (deficit) and cash flows, for the year ended June 30, 2006. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audit in accordance with the auditing standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. We were not engaged to perform an audit of internal control over financial reporting. Our audits include consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosure in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Conversion Solutions Holdings Corp. as of June 30, 2006 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year ended June 30, 2006 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. -S- Thomas Benson
CSHD has not got any cashflow?
The Company is the holder of a UCC Security Note (valued in excess of three hundred million USD), which was obtained as part of the merger with Waatle Holdings Corp. on June 17, 2005. The UCC Security Note was properly assigned to Waatle Holdings Corp. (assignee) on April 15, 2004 to be effective on May 27, 2004 from another company (assignor) in exchange for agreed upon consideration. The UCC Security Note is free and clear of all liens and encumbrances and the company has clear and marketable title to the assets securing the note. The assignor is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Washington and in good standing under the laws of such State. The value of the UCC Security Note is double collateralized, first by a federal judgment issued and second, by real property holdings appraised in excess of sixty million USD. The real property has been properly recorded as required by UCC Security statutes perfecting the interest of the assets, in accordance with the laws of the appropriate jurisdiction. The value components of the notes are as follows: $172,299,000 in principal and $137,839,000 in interest computed at 10%. The security note has a Certificate of Standing properly filed and recorded providing verification that there are no liens or other encumbrances against the note, and it is fully owned by the Company.
Total audited assets up to 30th June 06 $811,478,487
Lets keep bumping this page up for the benefit of newbies and skeptics alike!
-------------------- 'The rewards for those that persevere, far exceed the pain that must proceed the victory!' Posts: 399 | From: leeds, england | Registered: Jul 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
Someone on HSM ask this question CONVERSION SOLUTIONS HOLDINGS CORP. (A Development Stage Company) Statement of Cash Flows July 1, 2005 - June 30, 2006
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net Income $18,530,865
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities $18,530,865
INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
UCC Security Notes ($310,138,000)
Interest Receivable ($19,869,792)
Long-term Investment in Bonds ($500,000,000)
Net Cash Provided by Investing Activities ($830,007,792)
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Capital Stock $27,938
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income $770,949,489
Income Tax Payable $101,060
Note Payable $4,400,000
Long-Term Note $36,000,000
$811,478,487
Net Cash Increase (decrease) for the period $1,560
Can anyone tell me where the $830 million inn cash came from to acquire the bonds.
They don't own the bonds, they own the contract's for the bond's and have to pay for the bond's at a later date, here is how they will do that, these bond's are assets now, just like you buy a contract on a house, you pay for it later on or as you go. with this as a assets they have the backing from those major banks, they make the money on the % it pay's, raise there stock price because there company is worth alot more, they may sell some stock when it reaches 90.00 and pay off the bond's. These is all legal what they are doing it is very smart on Mr.Harris part. If someone can post this on HSM to answer there question. There are a holding vompany with a very smart CEO to pull that off.
Posts: 91 | Registered: Aug 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
This is to go along with Bud's assessment above:
The Company's plan of operations for the remainder of 2006 is to raise capital against its asset base and develop its’ role in the niche market for securities offerings using asset based funding techniques. This entails the development of the CSHC business model.
CSHC intends to list its stock on the NASD. To this end, CSHCis in discussion with various market makers to engage in a firm underwriting using a syndicated market distribution approach. Moreover, CSHCintends to set up a captive insurance operation through its’ insurance liaison with Lloyds affiliations, who are members of the CSHC team.
posted
UBSS is on the bid at 3.31. This may mean nothing today but I see a major gapper tomorrow.
Posts: 2309 | From: Minnesota | Registered: Feb 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
They did the same thing Friday... means nada now (L2's).
The financing is in place and all this talk and rehash of months old topics is all smoke.
Quite a few of the less polite on this thread have done nothing except criticize trading philosophies on a particular play. That also means nothing to me.
The real play in this stock now is what the forward looking comments say about the company. That is the story they have to tell convincingly now. They began with the management team and purchasing a not uncomplicated financial management system. Now it is time to see the business play. Based on what I have seen to date I do expect to be surprised and happily so.
-------------------- - "Pay it Forward" Posts: 1524 | Registered: Jun 2006
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by fryyguyy: This is to go along with Bud's assessment above:
The Company's plan of operations for the remainder of 2006 is to raise capital against its asset base and develop its’ role in the niche market for securities offerings using asset based funding techniques. This entails the development of the CSHC business model.
CSHC intends to list its stock on the NASD. To this end, CSHCis in discussion with various market makers to engage in a firm underwriting using a syndicated market distribution approach. Moreover, CSHCintends to set up a captive insurance operation through its’ insurance liaison with Lloyds affiliations, who are members of the CSHC team.
quote:Originally posted by Ace of Spades: So their Net Income is only $18,530,865...That's to impressive.
Think of this they where a private held company before the merger, they don't have to show everything then they can beat around the point's and bushes easy, i know i have a private held company. Once you become a public traded company as they did after the merger there is no hiding nothing anymore.
Posts: 91 | Registered: Aug 2006
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by TimW: How about this for a question.. is everyone thinking about their exit point?
$5 / share $15 / share $54 / share? $100 / share?
I need at least $70 to get the house we want with a pool.
You will get that house, don't worry i told you what was coming the other day RIGHT. Now i'm telling you your house is coming real soon Just do not sell to low that's all i'm saying my friend.
Posts: 91 | Registered: Aug 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
I have been silent too long and have to say something. I am a long time contributor and have been forced to use another name to make my point due to the likelihood that I would be trashed right out of this forum. Last night I came on line to see if any news had come out and I had to witness some of the people that I respect the most trashing someone to the ground because of their opinion. I am referring to thedoctor. After reading everyone's comments to this poor guy, I was literally too embarrased to contribute to any DD or to be associated with any part of that conversation. You all know me and would probably be surprised who I am. I consider myself an honest and respectful person. I would never treat another person who was speaking in a nice way and even went out of his way to apologize so many times like the way this group did last night. I can't tell you how disappointed I am in the people that I have respected the most on this board. I receive 4 PM's already from other members who feel exactly the same way. Why don't we say something? Because we would be driven right out of here, that's why? I think it's time that this group take some serious looks at their own actions and reevaluate how to treat people in the future. Last night was flat out wrong. We cannot ever forget that there are a lot of newbs out there, and we should show more respect to them and treat them like humans! Enough said!
Posts: 4 | Registered: Sep 2006
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Out_Of_Line: I have been silent too long and have to say something. I am a long time contributor and have been forced to use another name to make my point due to the likelihood that I would be trashed right out of this forum. Last night I came on line to see if any news had come out and I had to witness some of the people that I respect the most trashing someone to the ground because of their opinion. I am referring to thedoctor. After reading everyone's comments to this poor guy, I was literally too embarrased to contribute to any DD or to be associated with any part of that conversation. You all know me and would probably be surprised who I am. I consider myself an honest and respectful person. I would never treat another person who was speaking in a nice way and even went out of his way to apologize so many times like the way this group did last night. I can't tell you how disappointed I am in the people that I have respected the most on this board. I receive 4 PM's already from other members who feel exactly the same way. Why don't we say something? Because we would be driven right out of here, that's why? I think it's time that this group take some serious looks at their own actions and reevaluate how to treat people in the future. Last night was flat out wrong. We cannot ever forget that there are a lot of newbs out there, and we should show more respect to them and treat them like humans! Enough said!
Point well said
Posts: 91 | Registered: Aug 2006
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by thedoctor: If I can get a look at it...........and not have any more problems here, I will give it a try. To be honest with you, I am gunshy here. I definately don't want any more of this hostility. I am going to sleep now and I will try to look tomorrow. Thanks 10of13 for being nice.
I am catching up, but I think this guy is not who he says he is. I have a brother with a PHD and have met a few myself. Every single one of them has a very high opinion of themselves and is very eager to show off their expertise. IMHO, this was pretending to be a doctor (medical) in hopes people would give him immediate credibility. Then, when called on it by Sandi, he goes away for awhile until he comes up with the PHD of economics. Again, this I know about as I have a degree in Finance and economics myself. Never in my life have I met someone with a degree in economics who does not love to talk about this stuff. When asked to explain the bonds, he avoids the subject for awhile until Babe re-asks the question. At this time, the good Dr. says good night. Sorry, I'm not falling for it.
Have a super great Sunday and I will be checking in between the Cowboy game and the "Greek Food Festival" and running errands. GLTA
-------------------- "If you go the Extra Mile there will be no Traffic Jams".
St. Matthew Posts: 885 | From: Dallas, Texas | Registered: Sep 2006
| IP: Logged |
Several people on the board actually asked Doc some straight questions which he WOULD not answer. IMO the good Doc IMd Glass and hoped he would pass something on for him because Glass has history here. I was concerned about how he was going on about the officers and how they are likely criminals. I asked for facts from him, as in many other cases he ignored it. Then, as tension grew, yes...it got a bit heated and some of us took offense.
But, on to you. Everything i said to Doc and everything else on this board has been done through the login everyone knows. I dont sign out and sign back in because i have something stupid to post. I'll post my stupidity with pride. Although most of us do hide behind a nickname here at least we stick by that name. Now, you come in here with your opinion like some sort of knight in shining armor but no...no no no, you are wearing a guise not armor.
I expected a lot this weekend but i never expected to wake up to this crap. If you feel we were in the wrong then face up to it. You may be someone i know, and hey maybe ill even be surprised but until i know for sure ill just be cautious of you instead.
And FWIW. I WILL be surprised if you get any apologies for the Doc using this strategy.
Posts: 2308 | From: Michigan | Registered: Jun 2006
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Out_Of_Line: I have been silent too long and have to say something. I am a long time contributor and have been forced to use another name to make my point due to the likelihood that I would be trashed right out of this forum. Last night I came on line to see if any news had come out and I had to witness some of the people that I respect the most trashing someone to the ground because of their opinion. I am referring to thedoctor. After reading everyone's comments to this poor guy, I was literally too embarrased to contribute to any DD or to be associated with any part of that conversation. You all know me and would probably be surprised who I am. I consider myself an honest and respectful person. I would never treat another person who was speaking in a nice way and even went out of his way to apologize so many times like the way this group did last night. I can't tell you how disappointed I am in the people that I have respected the most on this board. I receive 4 PM's already from other members who feel exactly the same way. Why don't we say something? Because we would be driven right out of here, that's why? I think it's time that this group take some serious looks at their own actions and reevaluate how to treat people in the future. Last night was flat out wrong. We cannot ever forget that there are a lot of newbs out there, and we should show more respect to them and treat them like humans! Enough said!
OR...you're thedoctor. Any one of the regulars here would NOT be afraid to post that statement as we all respect each other. Just give up mate.
Topic Closed
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
Printer-friendly view of this topic
![[Cool]](cool.gif)
![[Smile]](smile.gif)
![[Wink]](wink.gif)
) ![[Frown]](frown.gif)
![[Razz]](tongue.gif)
