posted
sry, to make it clear, I had shares averaged at .09 after i flipped when "it " was like .11 then it dumped but i couldn't sell because i was on unsettled funds....low capital available and aint puttin more in either that was the deal with da wife.... so iza waitin......anda waitin...... findaly a pr hit so iza could play a bounce I have a little left to put in at .042 seein a rise to 053...i dont waitz to 053 though... i sell all at .047 I almost break even. down a little but still have my shirt. Now I'm set in decent longs that i can work during the day and check once a week. that is what i was talking about dust. not pumpin, just a newb caught in a fkd up flip waitin for a turn to catsup. oh and my bounce hit at .041 and went to .059 instead of .053 grrrrrr
-------------------- All post are my opinion. Do your own DD. Who's clicking your buy/sell button!?
IP: Logged |
posted
Anybody want a good laugh? Check this out..LMAO XKEM Recent high about .113---->now----> .0326
Me not a genious, but me doesn't think the following is how to become a Millionaire...
------------------------------------------------- Posted by: bigdaddyc25 In reply to: hockeypond who wrote msg# 25048 Date:7/13/2006 12:01:14 AM Post #of 25091
I am an IDIOT. I own 20M shares of this. I bought almost all of them at a penny. I sold NONE at the highs or on the way down. I am not rich at all. I fell in love with XKEM, and accumulated eveyrthing I could for months as Chassman was dumping. All in all, I put over $200K into this. I still hold 95% of my holding. Still up about $500K.
posted
Returning to my male bashing theme to keep us on topic because we never venture off topic, this boy publishes an investment newsletter, the boy up there. For the month of June, his stock picks lost nine-thousand dollars.
For NDOL, he pushed this one on readers, pushed this stock really hard at .55 to .65 per share. Readers lost half of their money and there is zero chance of recovery.
He is a classic example of masculine thinking. His masculine thinking molds his stock picks into a model which is acceptable to his ego, in turn, he loses money, along with his followers.
You will notice stereotypical masculine thinking in his article complaining about being banished from Allstocks. His masculine thinking is his being kicked out of here for the second or third time is not his fault. Men almost always engage in deep denial when confronted with their having made mistakes.
This deep denial of men, in turn, lessens learning. Men deny making mistakes and therefore oft will not review, will not self-critique, will not look to discover why they made a mistake. Men like this do not create a learning base as they move along through stock experiences; doomed to repeat the same mistakes, over and over.
All of us make mistakes in stock picks. I am most certainly no exception. Difference here is women, like Ten, are willing to acknowledge a mistake, are willing to learn from a mistake and are willing to avoid making the same mistake again.
Net effect is as women develop experience in trading stocks, we develop a healthy database of knowledge within our minds. As time passes and experiences build, we become better traders.
A prime example of women being superior traders than men is being developed and displayed in this model of our friend, Ten. Should you watch her, read her articles, you will see her discussing stocks in a realistic manner, questioning these opinions of others, giving thought, then providing her own opinions which often are cautionary.
And I can't speak to Allstock's policies on banning people. It isn't something I can decipher any pattern in or wish to debate with those who administer it (maybe dare as well as wish to debate). There are some that were banned I wouldn't have and some not banned I might have. Where I have such authority, it has never been used and probably won't ever be. I am a strong believer in the notion that authority and responsibility cannot be separated. That person you have denied a voice to also is one you have refused to listen to.
What I would like to find is that person that erases post without warning or reason, other than they don't concede to his or her leanings. If he has been granted the authority by someone at Allstocks, he seriously abuses it.
IP: Logged |
"...and accumulated eveyrthing I could for months as Chassman was dumping."
He is buying while the share price is falling. There has been no recovery nor will there be any recovery. His strategy results in a net loss of money for those shares he bought during the down fall of share prices.
Whether he is up or down, for a total net, is unknown. Nonetheless, buying stock during falling prices is amongst the worst of mistakes.
Readers should not confuse this with buying a healthy stock during expected periodic dips.
His is buying stock in the process of crashing because of poor company health. You will *always* lose money using this strategy.
posted
i have never seen the differences between masculine and feminine thinking stated as eloquently as pg did in rhis thread. on this board and in daily life is proof over and over that she is 100% right about this. good insight !
-------------------- I'm from Missouri - Show Me!
IP: Logged |
"What I would like to find is that person that erases post without warning or reason...."
Yep. This is problem which has been going on ever since the appearance of "Art" couple of years back. Not quite so bad since some of us raised Hell about this, but still going on; deletions based on personal prejudice.
Remember my "Eye of the Beholder" thread here in off topic? We enjoyed a lot of fun looking at attractive American Indian women. That thread has been slaughtered. Half of the articles are gone and all of the photographs have been removed.
How harmful can a thread like that be? All comments were positive and supportive. Not a single harsh comment, no bad words, just open and honest talk about the beauty of American Indian women who usually receive very little attention.
We were enjoying ourselves, even discussing the common genetic traits of American Indians which are expressed in cheeks, nose, mouth and chin, then that person walks in and destroys the thread.
posted
66inxs sent me email indicating he has began a series of estrogen treatments so he can think like a woman!
(just joking)
Readers should note I bash men, but my intent is not to bash _all_ men. We know there are many exceptions. Lots and lots of men out there are down right good men with high intelligence.
There are many men here who are excellent traders, are very polite and are a lot of fun.
We should not forget this when talking about men.
Only problem is those men, the good men here, still have that thing dangling between their legs.
posted
Why? According to you we ain't got a chance in the first place.
And I plan to keep mine right there in the first place. Even the thought of the indignity of having to squat to pee is disgusting. Of course women can operate with no ego. When you have to squat to pee, you certainly must "feel" the lack and get used to to it.
IP: Logged |
posted
By the way, remember a few years ago when the Mississippi river flooded it's banks and took out a few communities? Yep, my fault. From Southeast Wisconsin too.
IP: Logged |
posted
"By the way, remember a few years ago when the Mississippi river flooded it's banks and took out a few communities? Yep, my fault. From Southeast Wisconsin too."
Pfftt... Men are happy if they hit anything in a bathroom, floor, walls, hands...
I can shoot a mosquito out of the air at fifty yards, at night to boot. Not a drop on the ground.
posted
As I have seen it, I note that, to stop them from catching rain and being always filled with stagnant water, folks turn a dingy bottom side upwards. Then, when an exceptionally high tide comes in, the dingy fills up from underneath and never is in position to float at all, not to mention rise with the tide. It's human error, so to speak.
IP: Logged |
posted
"As I have seen it, I note that, to stop them from catching rain and being always filled with stagnant water, folks turn a dingy bottom side upwards."
You, Dusty, you silly boys and your boats.
All you have to do is drill several two inch holes in the bottoms of your dingy boats then no rain water will collect! Drains right out.
posted
"why not four inch holes so the water can rush out 6 times as fast?"
Oh, now you are trying to trick me with very high level math! Let me see, two inch holes equals rate x, four inch holes would be, uh, hmm, would be bigger by a lot and, well, the actual area of the new circle...
Ok, yeah, four inch holes.
Have I told you boys about my job down at the Newport Beach marina, you know, where all the rich and elite keep their boats?
(this should distract them from math calculations)
Assuming head is equal (depends on the rate of rainfall and has no effect at all until the 2 inch hole is not large enough to handle it),
4xPi(1x1) = Pi(2x2).
4, not 6.
And that is only at the instant the rainfall supplies to the 2 inch hole exactly that amount that is the maximum the hole can drain with zero head. Thereafter, until the rate increases sufficiently to overwhelm the 4 inch hole, there is a difference in pressures due to the changing head and the flow rates of the two holes aren't only functions of the diameters..
I'd go on, but it gets boring.
Just remember, pi are round, cornbread are square!
IP: Logged |
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
Printer-friendly view of this topic
![[Eek!]](eek.gif)
![[Frown]](frown.gif)
