quote:Originally posted by gmh37: [QUOTE]Originally posted by Dustoff101: [qb] I wanted Bush to get off his rear end, not go on a rumured drunk....Geez whats next? I can't believe I voted for this character...
Dustoff101
IMO, you're ar an .......? What can a Pres. do on a situation like this ? You think your Whitehouse WHORE Clinton could have done better ? - get a life
------------------------------------------------- Cool, I've been waiting for your sorry azz.. 1st, I wouldn't vote for Hillary.. 2nd, your nothing more than a stock scam Hustler.. 3 I wiill take my life just the way it is, and it's mighty good.. 4 Be a man and finish your pansie azz spelling 5 Don't mess with me, I think you may be mixed up in a scam group. And now you just put yourself on my radar..
IP: Logged |
posted
Why does everyone who criticizes Bush get accused of worshiping Clinton? I think it's called "Rush Limbaugh Syndrome." (Or is that an addiction to pain killers, LOL.)
Clinton was never a hero of mine. Bush is much worse.
IP: Logged |
posted
Well, 4Art, it's because they don't think too pretty good, as is evidenced by their lack of logical development in most things political. They have to be led and, because it is their Party that leads, they don't think. During the years of the Clinton White House, Fat Rush and other Party rulers dictated that they hate Clinton (which in their thrill of obeying the Party, slopped over to include his wife). After that, their own experience suggest to them that differing politically has to equate to hatred of dubya and love of Clinton, like they did. They are so wrapped in their illogical trap that they (1) believe Clinton was a liberal and (2) everyone that doesn't worship dubya loves Clinton.
Remember, if A implies B, then not B implies not A. To lean on the mistaken notion that, if A implies B, then B implies A, is not the process of a logical mimd.
Remember, too, the logical imperitive that not A is true whenever not B is true, follows from the FACT that "A implies B" is a true and factual statement. If you assume, falsly, that A implies B, all bets are off. Thus is the fate of all arguments beginning with an assumption like "Clinton is a liberal' or that "if you voice an opinion or objection against something Bush says or does, then you hate him".
IP: Logged |
posted
bdgee, well, ya did it again.. Concise, and well thought out post...
I think many Bush supporters are going through a kind of de-programing period..
Thats why they lash out so blindly without thinking...
Notice how they immediately go bash central personal, must be because they do not have a valid arguement... And some honesty within is trying to get out...Like a mis behaving child..
Problem is, when they do it to me, they're in for a fight..I always did luv a good bar room brawl.
IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Dustoff101: I wanted Bush to get off his rear end, not go on a rumured drunk....Geez whats next? I can't believe I voted for this character...
Dustoff101
IMO, you're ar an .......? What can a Pres. do on a situation like this ? You think your Whitehouse WHORE Clinton could have done better ? - get a life
gmh37
i love it...
if Clinton were in office? we wouldn't have any hurricanes, God obviously liked Clinton....
i mean, the terroists tried to knock down the Twin Towers when he was in office but thru divine intervention, they failed....( don't ask me how i know it was divine intervention, it's kindof embarrassing to admit that i get a chain letter that originates in heaven...soon i'll have sent them enough money to get it directly from St Peter's Macintosh instead of being the thirty seventh in line )
-------------------- Don't envy the happiness of those who live in a fool's paradise.
IP: Logged |
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
Printer-friendly view of this topic
![[Razz]](tongue.gif)
![[Big Grin]](biggrin.gif)
)
