Allstocks.com's Bulletin Board
Topic Closed  Topic Closed
Post New Topic  New Poll  
Topic Closed  Topic Closed
my profile login | register | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Allstocks.com's Bulletin Board » Micro Penny Stocks, Penny Stocks $0.10 & Under » FHAL - potential of $1,500,000,000 in gross revenue (Page 191)

 - UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!   This topic comprises 265 pages: 1  2  3  ...  188  189  190  191  192  193  194  ...  263  264  265   
Author Topic: FHAL - potential of $1,500,000,000 in gross revenue
SYGY
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for SYGY     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
good read here---http://www.sec.gov/litigation/litreleases/lr16651.htm
IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
SYGY
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for SYGY     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
http://www.sec.gov/litigation/litreleases/lr16651.htm
IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
user095263
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for user095263     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
ok so im just getting in... i know i missed a big ride today!

give me the gyst before i sift 10 pages

...the good the bad the good the bad the good... ended bad? or ended good?

and why are we reading lawsuit stuff??? [Confused]

~BB

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
user095263
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for user095263     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
arrrrgh i still dont get it [Frown]

lawsuit good or lawsuit bad????

reading backwards isnt easy.

someone intentionally is tanking us?

I DESERVE $15 PPS FOR ENDURING THIS DRAMA!

anyone nutshell please?
~BB

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Mr. CATIAEngineer
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Mr. CATIAEngineer     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Originally posted by betting babe:
ok so im just getting in... i know i missed a big ride today!

give me the gyst before i sift 10 pages

...the good the bad the good the bad the good... ended bad? or ended good?

and why are we reading lawsuit stuff??? [Confused]

~BB

Haha dont worry, the lawsuit stuff is against the chumps that some of us feel may be "playing" with our PPS
IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
T e x
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for T e x     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Originally posted by betting babe:
ok so im just getting in... i know i missed a big ride today!

give me the gyst before i sift 10 pages

...the good the bad the good the bad the good... ended bad? or ended good?

and why are we reading lawsuit stuff??? [Confused]

~BB

basically, peeps confused.

some think "standard" reverse-merger protocol applies, others convinced the "new-found" 368 provision applies...

at this point? emotion in control

DD needed on "368" regs

--------------------
Nashoba Holba Chepulechi
Adventures in microcapitalism...

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Mr. CATIAEngineer
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Mr. CATIAEngineer     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Originally posted by betting babe:
arrrrgh i still dont get it [Frown]

lawsuit good or lawsuit bad????

reading backwards isnt easy.

someone intentionally is tanking us?

I DESERVE $15 PPS FOR ENDURING THIS DRAMA!

anyone nutshell please?
~BB

There is evidence all over the net stating that l em on st ocks and our s tre et have been dealing with legality issues in the past regarding "tanking stock for own personal gain". Today they posted some very slanderous material and again we TANKED. Shortly after Rufus threatened them publicly with legal action
IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
cassity
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for cassity     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Originally posted by betting babe:
arrrrgh i still dont get it [Frown]

lawsuit good or lawsuit bad????

reading backwards isnt easy.

someone intentionally is tanking us?

I DESERVE $15 PPS FOR ENDURING THIS DRAMA!

anyone nutshell please?
~BB

A lot of little girls(no offense) selling! AHHHHH!

--------------------
www.air1.com

www.klove.com

-Cassity

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
user095263
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for user095263     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
oooooo suspense and intrigue! common sense tells me it would be hard for the human greed factor not to take over when ur a small stock analyzer. so 8 ball says verrry likely [Wink]

DD 368 regs got it, thx Tex.

nothing like checking your phone at 11am and seeing 1.38 and then at 3pm and seeing .98!!!

thx u guys!

hey cass, my girls aint sellin (nor are they for sale LOL)

~BB

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
cassity
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for cassity     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Originally posted by betting babe:
oooooo suspense and intrigue! common sense tells me it would be hard for the human greed factor not to take over when ur a small stock analyzer. so 8 ball says verrry likely [Wink]

DD 368 regs got it, thx Tex.

nothing like checking your phone at 11am and seeing 1.38 and then at 3pm and seeing .98!!!

thx u guys!

hey cass, my girls aint sellin (nor are they for sale LOL)

~BB

Just what "girls" are you talking about. Hmmmmm! GLTY [Wink]

--------------------
www.air1.com

www.klove.com

-Cassity

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Mr. CATIAEngineer
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Mr. CATIAEngineer     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Well, i havent found any "368 regs for dummies" so im completely screwed. Here is where my major lack of experience in the field kicks in. I sure hope someone makes some sense out of that stuff. I'll stick with engineering, you can fake your intelligence there. [Smile]
IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
mathis
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 5 posted      Profile for mathis     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
all i am getting on reg 368 is about stocks and taxes
IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
SYGY
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for SYGY     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Posted by: digiwench I-HUB POST
In reply to: None Date:7/26/2006 9:12:54 PM
Post #of 16458

LIST OF QUESTIONS FOR BEN STANLEY: COO
________________________________________

This is the final list of questions for tomorrow's Q&A session with Ben Stanley. If you have any new questions for him, please PM me with them. Thank you! (yes, the Q&A today was postponed due to the ********** fiasco, which they needed to address)

Sorry Rick, I was at Paltalk was busy all afternoon, and trying to get through to Ben Stanley.

I was on Paltalk, when we heard about **********. I'm the one who called him to let him know that FHAL stock was under attack, and he thanked me, and cancelled our meeting tonight at 4:30.

Later this evening, he called me to let me know that CVSU had filed a lawsuit against **********, and another site called "our street.com" He told me that he would in the morning they would be releasing PRs and then he would call me to let me know when we could set up the Q&A. In the meantime , here is the list of questions we put together to ask him:

10-K, S-4 and 8-K Qustions:

1) In the 8k it reads: "In the event that the Actual Average Closing Price is less than $15.00, the Surviving Holdings Company shall deliver written notice to the Company no later than the second (2nd ) Business Day preceding the Closing Date pursuant to which the Surviving Holdings Company shall elect, in its sole discretion, to: maintain the Average Closing Price at a price equal to the Actual Average Closing Price"

This indicates that the price could fall to less than $15. Is this correct? What steps will CVSU elect to take in order to "maintain Average Closing Price equal to the Actual Average Closing Price?"

Please clarify.

2) Since option A in section 2.6 of the 8-K states:

" In the event that the Actual Average Closing Price is ***LESS*** than $15.00, the Surviving Holdings Company shall deliver written notice to the Company no later than the second (2 nd ) Business Day preceding the Closing Date pursuant to which the Surviving Holdings Company shall elect, in its sole discretion, to: (a) maintain the Average Closing Price at a price equal to the Actual Average Closing Price;

Why is Rufus saying that option A only applies if the price is *ABOVE* $15/share, when it says ***LESS*** than $15.00?

If the price is LESS than $15 does this not say that they can use "the Average Closing Price at a price equal to the Actual Average Closing Price" and NOT $15/share.

3) Can this deal be cancelled as stated in the 8-K, section 2.6?

(c) set the Average Closing Price at $15.00 and pay no additional consideration to the holders of Company Shares receiving shares of Buyer's Stock as Merger Consideration (after giving effect to the allocation procedures set forth in Section 2.4 ). In the event that the Buyer elects option (c) described above, ***the Company may terminate this Agreement*** by providing the Buyer written notice of termination no later than one (1) Business Day prior to the Closing Date.

What assurance do we have that the section that states ***the Company may terminate this Agreement*** will not take place?

4) Will the 10K be filed by Friday?

5) What's more important than the filing date is when the 10K will be available for public viewing.


FHAL Questions:

1) I know this seems like an obvious question, but could you just explain to us "Why arent any of the institutions Rufus mentioned buying FHAL stock now for $1? why wait till its $15?"

2) "WHY would the institutions buy this stock at $15 and support it from falling?" Can you give us the names of any of these institutions? Which insitutions are involved in the post merger $15 PPS support?

3) What day do they expect to trading to halt, and CVSU trading begun? Do you expect this to take place after trading hours? How long will the halt last? Will it be less than two days?

4) Can we expect trading in FHAL to be halted within the next five business days?

5) Will existing FHAL stockholders be able to trade shares as soon as their brokers redefine their holdings to CVSU, after the halt?

6) what was the exact number for the fhal O/S? and has this increased in the past 2 weeks?


CVSU Questions:

1) Does CVSU own all of the existing FHAL float?

2) If no. What percentage of the float do they own?

3) Is it true that CVSU Executives, such as Paul Harris, cannot sell their personal shares for a period of 90 days after the new CVSU ticker symbol begins to trade?

4) If that is incorrect, when CAN a CVSU executive begin selling their personal shares?

5) Do they KNOW THE WHALES ARE THAT OWN THE REMAINDER?
(Do you personally know who are the big owners of the oustanding large blocks of shrares)

6) How much does CVSU have in cash, not bonds, IOUS or ICC Euro notes?

7) What is CVSU's current revenue stream?

8) What are the terms and nature of the 500 mil bond Caracas Group "invested in " CVSU ?

9) How did CVSU get its hands on a lawsuit won for 300 mil against the state of Washington ?

10) RPH mentioned that the washington Bonds were part of the fallout from the S&L crisis. Do we understand this correctly?

11) How much interest do those bonds pay?

12) Can you shed any additional light on the nature of the Euroclear bonds?

13) Has CVSU's trust representative has been buying shares in the past few days...especially this morning?

Post Merger Questions:

1) Are there PRs aligned post ticker change that will help support or bring in new investors, e.g. large contracts etc

2) Are there $15 billion in institutional buyers lining up to buy CVSU shares after August 1st?

3) Is there the possibility of a Forward Split taking place within 90 days of the new ticker symbols start of trading?

4) RPH has also mentioned several times about CVSU considering a forward split; what is the projected time window they are targetting for, and what ratios are they considering, such as 3:2, 2:1, or even 3:1

5) What quarter are they targeting their first subsidiary IPO for, what price range and what range of probable share volume and are they targeting GA as the first candidate
(Each of these would add value to why we stockholders should hold rather than sell at first opportunity....... and would encourage new investors adding buying pressure on the stock)

6) Are there existing Notes and/or Debentures on CVSU stock that can be converted right after the merger (or even now) and are they restricted in any way?

Obvious Questions:

1) Will the new ticker CVSU begin trading at $15?

2) Is Rufus Paul Harris known to be a regular poster on Investorshub.com FHAL board?

3) Can you assure everyone in this room that there will be NO 90-120 day waiting period for the stock to "convert" from FHAL to CVSU.

4) Will there be any additional pr's prior to the merger to help restore investor confidence?


Joint Venture Questions:

1) Can you comment on where "Lotteryfever.com" stands today? Are there contracts with states in the works? Which states? How many machines are expected to be sold over the next year?

2) What is the business of "Rocky Road Entertainment"? What would you say is the value of this particular holding?

3) What is AISS's current revenue stream, approximately.

4) Are there any large or imminent contracts that shareholders should be aware of? Would these contracts be signed within three months?

5) After AISS, which of CVSU's other ventures is believed to be the most lucrative?

6) Why?

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Mr. CATIAEngineer
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Mr. CATIAEngineer     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Wow, those are good. This should be an interesting (and apparently well planned) interview. I hope soooooo much that they can answer all of those without even so much as a hiccup!

Hopefully some of those will even be answered in the morning if a well needed PR hits the wire

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
T e x
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for T e x     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Originally posted by mathis:
all i am getting on reg 368 is about stocks and taxes

remember, as posted by the company? this is IRS-related, "non-taxable"

--------------------
Nashoba Holba Chepulechi
Adventures in microcapitalism...

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
GreenDay
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for GreenDay     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Originally posted by T e x:
"Most of the confusion seems to be the rules surrounding a reverse merger aquisition and a reorganization."

Not from my perspective: I believe the "new-one-on-us" is the 386 dealie, "nontaxable" wrinkle.

Tex - what?
IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
stocknut2007
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for stocknut2007     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
wow! very good questions indeed. only wish the interview could of been earlier, like a few days ago. Excitement in the air..woohoooo.
IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
T e x
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for T e x     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Originally posted by GreenDay:
quote:
Originally posted by T e x:
"Most of the confusion seems to be the rules surrounding a reverse merger aquisition and a reorganization."

Not from my perspective: I believe the "new-one-on-us" is the 386 dealie, "nontaxable" wrinkle.

Tex - what?
Green,

This appears to *not* be a "standard" reverse merger.

For one? the company promises no r/s...

Yet, many believe a price adjustment is imminent. Apparently, this traces to regs invoked by the company involving an IRS aspect, namely the "368" language....

does that help?

--------------------
Nashoba Holba Chepulechi
Adventures in microcapitalism...

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
GreenDay
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for GreenDay     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Yea, I guess THANKS! too much information in my head today.

I'm also trying to read some of these stoc k le mon links and it makes me wonder how they can still be up and running.

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
SYGY
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for SYGY     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
More From I-HUB:

SUMMARY OF BEN STANLEY phone calls today.

Last night I called Ben Stanley at his home. It was 9:40 at night, and I could hear his kids in the background.

I told him that there were some concerned investors here who need answers.

I tried to set up a Q&A on Paltalk for today at 12:30. He told me that he and Rufus would be busy working, could he do it at 4:30 We set it up for 4:30.

However, in the afternoon, someone alerted the room that FHAL had been placed on stock lemon.com.

I called Ben Stanley immediately to tell him this news, and urged him to do something. I called him again fifteen minutes later, when we saw the Level 2s collapsing.I impressed on him the importance of handling the situation immediately. People in the Paltalk room told me to relate the story of STTK. Ben Stanley then said CVSU was going to "deal" with the situation, and said they would be cancelling the meeting for today.

At 4:30, he called me back and told me two things:

They would be releasing "PR(s)" tomorrow morning. I don't know how many that means. More than one, for sure. Maybe two. These would be addressinng stock lemon and our-street, I was told.

He told me that they had already begun a lawsuit against the people who had posted negative press against CVSU. He also had quite alot to say about Bbane, which I tried to transcribe, and will post separately.

That is simply what he told me.

Finally, he said that after the PRs, he would be calling me to set up a new hour for the Q&A.

I will post that time as soon as I know myself.

We know for sure that it will be held at PALTALK.

Ben Stanley "hinted" at financials being released on Friday, but then changed the subject quickly. I don't know how to interpret that. I am hoping that this means that we will have financials soon. PLEASE don't quote me on this. Instead, come to the Paltalk Q&A and ask Ben Stanley himself.

He said that they have "a plan". We need to know what that is.

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
GreenDay
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for GreenDay     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I hope they wait until eod for the Q&A this time. We haven't had the best of luck with their during hours chats.

I'll sure we will all be tuned in closely tomorrow. Good night.

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
10of13
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for 10of13     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
8K filing
http://www.pinksheets.com/quote/print_filings.jsp?url=%2Fredirect.asp%3Ffilename %3D0001297077%252D06%252D000046%252Etxt%26filepath%3D%255C2006%255C07%255C12%255 C&symbol=FHAL

CVSU is a private company (owned buy Rufas and Stanley)
"They" want to be able to trade those stocks
CVSU "claims" they are worth at least $15/share

CVSU buys FHAL (already done),
They will merge
Old CVSU share holders will get 1 share of "FHAL" shares for each CVSU they have
(really RUFAS AND STANLEY will now have 2 shares of the "merged" company)
All shares are now called "CVSU"...
If on the close of day on the first trading day of the "new" ticker symbol..CVSU...does not close at or above the $15.00 mark...all CVSU holders(forget about the symbol of FHAL..it no longer excists)will recieve the difference in $...


According to Rufas and his PR's and the not so wonderful talks with M N1
Rufas has said no R/S but some people have said that "they" would do a R/S but according to this link they would need to give a 10 day notice.

http://www.otcbb.com/aboutOTCBB/secrules.stm

10B-17

Given to the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc., no later than 10 [calendar] days prior to the record date involved or, in case of a rights subscription or other offering if such 10 [calendar] days advance notice is not practical, on or before the record date and in no event later than the effective date of the registration statement to which the offering relates, and such notice includes:


How can they close and reset the "pps"?

FHAL was bancrupt and according to the below link...they can close and "reset the PPS"

Send us a link http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/757563/000129707706000046/fhaul8-kmergers igned.htm from Rufus and here is another link that defines the reorganization http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-drop/rr-01-24.pdf from Rufus. I'm doing this as he is talking so forgive.

--------------------
#1 Rule: Protect your capital! #2 Rule: Never fall for the BS on the boards!

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
T e x
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for T e x     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
"If on the close of day on the first trading day of the "new" ticker symbol..CVSU...does not close at or above the $15.00 mark...all CVSU holders(forget about the symbol of FHAL..it no longer excists)will recieve the difference in $..."

ok, great--right here: close of day on the first trading day of the "new" ticker symbol..CVSU

good find... (have not verified, but good evidence that FHAL shareholders interests carry forward)

good post...

--------------------
Nashoba Holba Chepulechi
Adventures in microcapitalism...

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
mathis
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for mathis     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Originally posted by T e x:
quote:
Originally posted by mathis:
all i am getting on reg 368 is about stocks and taxes

remember, as posted by the company? this is IRS-related, "non-taxable"
This is all I can come up with..Sorry a bit new to this..not sure if this will even help
http://www.nysscpa.org/cpajournal/2005/605/essentials/p58.htm

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
unclerudy
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for unclerudy     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
SYGY,

Can you also ask about Brittenum Brothers Entertainment, Inc. and Seko Management Inc.? Find out how they are related to CVSU, what future plans they have with them, how they got involved with them, and anything else that you can think of about the two groups. The Brittenum Brothers where the ones on "American Idol" that one thought that the other had been voted off, and then quit, then found out that he hadn't been voted off. Later they had some trouble with buying a car with someone else's information, and I think that they where charged with identity theft and fraud. Please find out more about them, and how they will impact the future of the company.

--------------------
Muad'Dib knew that every experience carries its lesson.

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
user095263
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for user095263     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
im reading:

http://www.vcinstitute.org/bookstore/exitingmushkin.html

and

http://www.orrick.com/publications/index.asp?action=article&articleID=233

because they seem pertinent but im still seeing if the actually are.. thought id share.

kinda like homework.

~BB

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
vettes76
Member


Member Rated:
5
Icon 1 posted      Profile for vettes76     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Excellent post BB, probably best I have seen today. By the way, hello crowd I am in as of earlier this morning * 1.09. Wish you the all the best!
IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Uncle Smelly
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Uncle Smelly     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Have you guys been following the Ihub board ? Jesus Crimeny, it's an absolute circus over there today !

Everyday this is becoming the 'soap opera' penny of 2006 ! Nuts.

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
SYGY
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for SYGY     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
you are DARN right UNCLE SMELLY!!!inever realized that our ceo RUFUS actually post's quite a bit on I-Hub,,,went through his post's that he has done, through his profile!!actually kinda kool guy!!
IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
SYGY
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for SYGY     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
you are DARN right UNCLE SMELLY!!!inever realized that our ceo RUFUS actually post's quite a bit on I-Hub,,,went through his post's that he has done, through his profile!!actually kinda kool guy!!
IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Jo4321
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for Jo4321     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Tex writes:
quote:
This appears to *not* be a "standard" reverse merger.

For one? the company promises no r/s...

Promises mean nothing. See VWKM Thread

That "policy" of no reverse split was in writing in a PR. No reverse splits Guess what is happenning tommorrow?

Caution is in order here.

Jo

--------------------
"Great Day for Up!"....Dr. Seuss

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Mr. CATIAEngineer
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Mr. CATIAEngineer     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Originally posted by Jo4321:
Tex writes:
quote:
This appears to *not* be a "standard" reverse merger.

For one? the company promises no r/s...

Promises mean nothing. See VWKM Thread

That "policy" of no reverse split was in writing in a PR. No reverse splits Guess what is happenning tommorrow?

Caution is in order here.

Jo

Well, thats sort of depressing. Thanks for giving me yet another thing to worry about. [Smile]
IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
fhalyesss
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for fhalyesss     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
There is a major difference between VWKM and FHAL as regards reverse splilts:
The VWKM PR was two months before the announcment of the r/s. At the time the managment was different and the stock was not under an intense spotlight.
Rufus would have to be pretty stupid to say no r/s and then do it less than a week after.That would make it look very pre-meditated!

--------------------
'The rewards for those that persevere, far exceed the pain that must proceed the victory!'

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
T e x
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for T e x     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Jo makes a valid point; pennyland, after all. Still, having documents filed with SEC is stronger than simply a PR.

That's another horse to wash and brush, though...Not saying it doesn't need washing n brushing....

But, the point of the statement was to focus on the "different" nature of this merger--the whole pps "reset" capability is being claimed because of the 368 provision.

--------------------
Nashoba Holba Chepulechi
Adventures in microcapitalism...

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
GreenDay
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for GreenDay     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Tex, don't you sleep - you were here when I went to bed last night. Thanks for the great points to ponder.
IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
  This topic comprises 265 pages: 1  2  3  ...  188  189  190  191  192  193  194  ...  263  264  265   

Post New Topic  New Poll  
Topic Closed  Topic Closed
Open Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


Contact Us | Allstocks.com Message Board Home

© 1997 - 2021 Allstocks.com. All rights reserved.

Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.2

Share