quote:Originally posted by St. Matthew: I do not have solid proof, but I can offer some pretty good deductive reasoning.
Tut was getting frustrated with Rufus not acting like he cared about us...the shareholder. He felt like we were suffering needlessly. He wanted to talk to Rufus about running the company while Rufus took care of the Naked Short Selling issue. I do not know if they ever had dialog concerning this, but I do know Tut felt like he could do a good job running this company. He told me several times that he was qualified.
Tut also told us several times that he would not desert us and that he would support us to the end. I do know his name was "John", but I do not know his last name.
Since this announcement was made about John Arlitt taking over the company, Tut has not posted. He actually has not posted since Thanksgiving morning.
Today, Tut's user name and posts were removed from the HSM website.
I don't know about you, but those dots are easy to connect. Is it 100% proof...no, but it certainly looks like John Arlitt is / was Tut.
I could be wrong...but I don't think so.
quote:Originally posted by humble:
quote:Originally posted by T e x: wah...
nobody answered my question: to wit, I thought the Tut/Arlitt ID was established. As I'm reading here, however, that ID is still up in the air...
ie, no one can "prove" that TUT is the new CEO?
I am not so sure it is of almighty importance as to whether Arlitt is Tut. I have for some time believed that not only is Rufus part of something much bigger but CVSU is in general as well.
We all wonder how this little company with such an odd mishmash of rotating characters at the helm could have anything to do with the huge implications alluded to by a few posters. Maybe we are only seeing a very small slice of a very big pie. Take a moment to imagine that CVSU, just like all of us smaller fish, stumbled across a monsterous opportunity and has been positioning themselves to become a player, to any extent, in a really big game.
I do not believe that John Arlitt is the ultimate leader of this company. I do not believe that Rufus is as incompetent as apparent facts would suggest. And foremost, I believe that the events we have seen to date are somewhat irrelevant as to where we are going.
And before you blast my opinion, please realize that I have seen my position in this company rise and fall just like everyone else. I simply choose to wait to pass judgement until the bigger picture comes into focus.
... In My humble Opinion
"I do not have solid proof,"
makes sense to me...
"but I can offer some pretty good deductive reasoning."
posted
It is sort of comical watching everyone using "pretty good deductive reasoning" in connecting the dots from Tut to Arlitt. Reminds me of my college days when Beatle fans across the world connected the dots from the Sgt Pepper album pictures, to playing songs backwards on the turntable, to the only one not having shoes on in the Abbey Road album cover to come up with the brilliant deductive reasoning that PAUL IS DEAD. LMAO. Heck, he'll probably outlive Ringo and be the last one to die.
Posts: 276 | Registered: Nov 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
Filed: 11/29/2006 Entered: 11/29/2006 Entered By: Velma Shanks, Event Name(s): Clerk's Entry of Default Full Docket Text: Clerk's Entry of Default as to Rufus Paul Harris (vs)
No Related Docket Entries
Posts: 6410 | Registered: Jul 2006
| IP: Logged |
So, the only person from the shareholder committee to speak out has been TonySoprano and his comments were negative towards Rufus.
The shareholder committee released a document some days ago burning Rufus.
Even Arlitt took shots at Rufus stating that he just wasnt the guy to lead this company.
Simon asked Rufus one night if he thuoght that the company was in danger of a hostile takeover.
Tut managed to gather a following over at HSM and managed to get a 51% majority vote to "de-throne" Rufus. Rufus "acted out" yesterday by toying with the CSHD website.
What does this all mean to me? Arlitt was most definately NOT in the plan IMO. I still stand by my post from yesterday, i expect more offensive actions taken against Rufus and/or the other officers from Arlitt and our committee.
"TheGreaterGood" - Could be anyones aunt/uncle but im betting its a relative of Rufus.
We havent heard the last of Rufus IMO. He toyed with the website yesterday to send us that message.
This is just my mind working in overtime. All my opinion of a seriously confusing situaton.
Posts: 2308 | From: Michigan | Registered: Jun 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
Catia, you seem to have a little more info than some of the rest of us, and even a shareholder committee "gag order" should not allow a select group of shareholders more information than others. Whether a person has one share or a million shares, he/she is entitled to the same information as the rest.
So, if you would be so kind, please produce the document from the shareholder committee burning Rufus.
And because of your valuable insight and contributions to this board (you got me rethinking yesterday), please answer this questions: If the scenario as you put forth is what has actually happened, is this positive or negative events as it relates to the company?
Posts: 276 | Registered: Nov 2006
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by wv1973: Catia, you seem to have a little more info than some of the rest of us, and even a shareholder committee "gag order" should not allow a select group of shareholders more information than others. Whether a person has one share or a million shares, he/she is entitled to the same information as the rest.
So, if you would be so kind, please produce the document from the shareholder committee burning Rufus.
And because of your valuable insight and contributions to this board (you got me rethinking yesterday), please answer this questions: If the scenario as you put forth is what has actually happened, is this positive or negative events as it relates to the company?
Actually WV, ive watched things transpire in this saga for 5 months now and have witnessed things that are just bizzare. You are sort of "calling me out" but if you read closely im basing all of my opinions on public information. Im just connecting the dots as TheGreaterGood suggested.
The document i am referring to is not a secret document. Im referring to the document that surfaced some time ago after the committee was formed. Im on my work PC and am missing a lot of my "favorites" here, could someone please post a link to that document? I believe it was a Powerpoint (pps) file?
To answer your question, im not sure if this is good or bad or even if im correct. Actually, im hoping that someone with a bit more experience can tell me if there is any benefit to the shareholders "taking over" as they have.
Posts: 2308 | From: Michigan | Registered: Jun 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
Ok, i guess the document i was referring to above was not a pps file. Anyone have a link to the document? The one that the shareholder committee released after being formed?
Posts: 2308 | From: Michigan | Registered: Jun 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
Good morning everyone! I heard this and started cracking up- thinking of all the "know boat" crew members that speak of knowing things through someone who knows from someone else
posted
Catia, please don't take the calling you out phrase as negative. Not my intention at all. You just seem to have a level head and post with backup which many don't do -- even me. Thanks for all you do here.
Posts: 276 | Registered: Nov 2006
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by frank021474: Good morning everyone! I heard this and started cracking up- thinking of all the "know boat" crew members that speak of knowing things through someone who knows from someone else
quote:Originally posted by frank021474: Good morning everyone! I heard this and started cracking up- thinking of all the "know boat" crew members that speak of knowing things through someone who knows from someone else
posted
Good morning folks. I have not been following our little stock here for the past few days. Looks like they booted Rufus again, huh... Anyone wanna give me the short and sweet on what's happening?
-------------------- "I will smack you in the mouth, I'm Neil Diamond"- Will Ferrell Posts: 4190 | From: Rhode Island | Registered: Mar 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
Ok, i stand corrected. I dont see that the committee was burning Rufus in the updates they offered. I must be thinking more about the posts from TonySoprano and the recent de-throning of Rufus. My information is seriously jumbled up these days, i need to better organize. Sorry for the confusion.
No problem WV, i wasnt offended by being "called out". In fact, your questions were warranted and i spoke too soon before reviewing the shareholer committee website again.
Posts: 2308 | From: Michigan | Registered: Jun 2006
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by frank021474: Good morning everyone! I heard this and started cracking up- thinking of all the "know boat" crew members that speak of knowing things through someone who knows from someone else
posted
CRab/Catia, thanks. I remember that letter now but just didn't remember how pointed the committee was.
Posts: 276 | Registered: Nov 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
IMO, Rufus pushed for the shareholders committee ... he also mentioned someone else would be CEO, that he would step down in a relatively short period of time. Well ... that's what happened, right? Can we say how far Rufus is out of the loop? ... maybe he is in by involvement (he is a shareholder) but out by name.
Isn't this how Rufus left BBAN ... voted out? I cannot see why he would help set-up a shareholders committee if it could be the very thing that could potentially do him in! I do not think the shareholders committee would exist, at this time, if it wasn't for Rufus.
And yes Tex, many of us do express and read between the lines ... seems like most of this play is between the lines! LOL!!! BTW, I always apppreciate your perspective Tex, as I'm sure many do! GLTA
-------------------- ... make you're decisions only on you're own DD ... Posts: 348 | From: Arizona | Registered: Jul 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
Greatergood and all the other secret order of CSHD should concentrate more on getting this stock out of the realm of big talk into the realm of big money and business. So far inspite of what any may have said the knoboat is in about the same part of the water that it was months ago.
Posts: 957 | Registered: Jun 2006
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by TaxBack04: Jenna ~ I think I have got a good start on "connecting the dots" and of course my DD will come with links. I will send you something in a bit.
Awesome Tax - Thanks!!
-------------------- ..just remember....Family is EVERYTHING!! Posts: 3944 | From: Rochester, NY | Registered: Sep 2006
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by frank021474: Good morning everyone! I heard this and started cracking up- thinking of all the "know boat" crew members that speak of knowing things through someone who knows from someone else
Topic Closed
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
Printer-friendly view of this topic
![[Razz]](tongue.gif)
![[Big Grin]](biggrin.gif)
(or is he on tour somewhere?) ![[Smile]](smile.gif)
