This does seem too (good) contrived to actually fly. Too incestuous. Both companies are connected via Jayme Dorroughs. Do you think the SEC will actually let this spin out this way? "IF" the SEC is actually in place for our protection, this circumvents their controls. And it seems they wouldn't like that just on principle. Thanks.
Posts: 260 | Registered: Mar 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
I'm stuck with BHUB so I really hope this works but if I can see that it's all just Dorrough playing a shell game then NASD may look at this and say- WHOAAA - hold on there. I hope I am wrong but looks like Dorrough has been succesfull at 1 thing only and that is selling shares.
Posts: 27 | Registered: Apr 2007
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by williamjones: I just read TELA's filings. Not to rain on the parade but TELA is JAYME DORROUGH and Dorrough is BHUB and Yucatan. Further TELA has a string of failed ventures behind it and revenues of $0.
This may get BHUB back to trading but I suggest a through Googling of Ms,. Dorrough is in order. None ZERO NADA of her business ventures have ever worked - something doesn't smell right.
yea, they are a "business develop co."LOL Developing ever more ways to steal money. Don't think this will work out as smoothly as they are thinking- but then again...I would be happy if this started a little short squeeze, but I doubt it- seems like this will be drawn out. Also doesn't it seem if Yucatan had been working on this since Nov 6... they would have already pr'd the "working agreement"??
quote:Originally posted by williamjones: I just read TELA's filings. Not to rain on the parade but TELA is JAYME DORROUGH and Dorrough is BHUB and Yucatan. Further TELA has a string of failed ventures behind it and revenues of $0.
This may get BHUB back to trading but I suggest a through Googling of Ms,. Dorrough is in order. None ZERO NADA of her business ventures have ever worked - something doesn't smell right.
yea, they are a "business develop co."LOL Developing ever more ways to steal money. Don't think this will work out as smoothly as they are thinking- but then again...I would be happy if this started a little short squeeze, but I doubt it- seems like this will be drawn out. Also doesn't it seem if Yucatan had been working on this since Nov 6... they would have already pr'd the "working agreement"??
posted
I just hope we get a day or 2 trading out of this so I can get out. While it all sounds fishy to me we got to remember that certainly Peterson is working for shares and he is sort of working on contingency - if he can get BHUB trading again then he can cash in his shares and get paid. ALl the while that BHUB is halted the insiders are stuck also.
I'm gonna hope and assume that in the meeting yesterday with the DTC he got their blessing to do this or they struck this deal:
We'll let you convert BHUB to TELA but you have to take it all fake and real shares so forget suing the TA and the MMs or anyone. In return he gets to get paid.
Sure they said in the PR they will pursue the bad guys but OJ said he would find teh real killers also.
Posts: 27 | Registered: Apr 2007
| IP: Logged |
posted
William, 2 or 3 days of trading is all any of us want I would assume, I know thats all I am hoping for. The thing to look for is the 8k from tela, saying its a done deal and how it is structured ie. restricted shares. (hmmmmm maybe another paiv. lol) another is the price of tela. many will look at that as the true value of bhub. whether it is or not is irrellevent in my mind. Its all about the perception that will make you money in plays like this. This is all MOMO. Everything else is just fluff. Have a great weekend. TMAN...
-------------------- In the end, trust only yourself when trading stocks. Posts: 2048 | From: Texas | Registered: Feb 2006
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by BlackWidow: Tex or any other big brain,
This does seem too (good) contrived to actually fly. Too incestuous. Both companies are connected via Jayme Dorroughs. Do you think the SEC will actually let this spin out this way? "IF" the SEC is actually in place for our protection, this circumvents their controls. And it seems they wouldn't like that just on principle. Thanks.
Possibly the Florida SOS would be interested to know what's going on, doubt they will find out anything though. Looks to me like "Sparrow" had NOTHING to do with this and the BHUB/TELA family had everything to do with it. Proof? nope none nada.... yet. Opportunity - clear as day with a lil pumping here and there spreading rumors about RMs and then bouncing the price. Coincidence that this happened when it did? 20mm shares controlled by bhub through tela dated 20 november? That's a lot of TELA dilution waiting to happen. I wouldn’t be to quick to say bhub was a victim of fraud – sure smells like insider fraud to me. Maybe we are closer to who "Sparrow" really is than we think. Or at least one of them.
Jmo of course
-------------------- All post are my opinion. Do your own DD. Who's clicking your buy/sell button!? Posts: 7800 | From: Virginia | Registered: May 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
I wouldn’t be to quick to say bhub was a victim of fraud – sure smells like insider fraud to me. Maybe we are closer to who "Sparrow" really is than we think.
I think it is pretty clear who sparrow was. My guess is that the DTC hatched this up as a way for Peterson and his crew to get out. Quite generous of them actually. Would have loved to hear that tel call. DTC: here's how your gonna make real the fake shares and you can forget about suing TA's or MMs or anyone. We caught you - now everybody back to trading.
My guess is that we won't hear anything else about Select Transfer or Jack Sparrow. The market will dilute this pig to .0001.
quote:Originally posted by BooDog: [QUOTE]Originally posted by BlackWidow: Tex or any other big brain,
This does seem too (good) contrived to actually fly. Too incestuous. Both companies are connected via Jayme Dorroughs. Do you think the SEC will actually let this spin out this way? "IF" the SEC is actually in place for our protection, this circumvents their controls. And it seems they wouldn't like that just on principle. Thanks.
Possibly the Florida SOS would be interested to know what's going on, doubt they will find out anything though. Looks to me like "Sparrow" had NOTHING to do with this and the BHUB/TELA family had everything to do with it. Proof? nope none nada.... yet. Opportunity - clear as day with a lil pumping here and there spreading rumors about RMs and then bouncing the price. Coincidence that this happened when it did? 20mm shares controlled by bhub through tela dated 20 november? That's a lot of TELA dilution waiting to happen. I wouldn’t be to quick to say bhub was a victim of fraud – sure smells like insider fraud to me. Maybe we are closer to who "Sparrow" really is than we think.
Jmo of course [/QUOTE"
The FBI is investigating- if they had anything to do with it, they are going to JAIL so, no, "sparrow" is the guy- if they are related...??
quote:Originally posted by BlackWidow: Tex or any other big brain,
This does seem too (good) contrived to actually fly. Too incestuous. Both companies are connected via Jayme Dorroughs. Do you think the SEC will actually let this spin out this way? "IF" the SEC is actually in place for our protection, this circumvents their controls. And it seems they wouldn't like that just on principle. Thanks.
sorry for the delay--was posting an answer...but then a tornado hit a FEW BLOCKS away
smoked one of my monitors, somehow...
anyway, first a bit of a quibble...this is not an SEC action. True, under this new type of halt, a continuation of 4+ days requires a 15c2-11 response...but I doubt anyone in the trading community understands the width/depth of this new regulatory tool...may alter the landscape of penny trading, for better or ill...
whether it circumvents the intent of the halt is debateable, imo... the halt--even though coded "T1" seems squarely aimed at obtaining control of the unreg shares. As some have suggested, authorities may have "pointed the way" to a market solution... i dunno...remember this, though--protecting "investors" *in* a play is rarely (never ) the point, but instead clamping down on something that may spread exponentially. The "real" point is to "protect the system," imo...
posted
Yikes, Tex, so you've been hit by the first wave of the perfect storm? Seriously, (Grey's Anatomy recap last night!) sorry about your monitor. Hope your merrimac is ok.
Yes, I realize the halt wasn't initially a SEC action, just wondered if this would now hit their bells and whistles.
Posts: 260 | Registered: Mar 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
ya, was a small monitor, no biggee...just pulled one from the bench... but ya...we're ALL OVER the news...one guy I know actually dove for cover from the funnel...didn't get him, but a tree got his truck...
My sense is the SEC *wants* to sit back and let NASD deal with these...hence the "variable response" at NASD's disposal... what a powerful tool! they can now halt pennies for a short period, then say OK, timeout over--as you were... OR they can "suspend," if you will as effectively as the SEC
quote:Originally posted by williamjones: I just read TELA's filings. Not to rain on the parade but TELA is JAYME DORROUGH and Dorrough is BHUB and Yucatan. Further TELA has a string of failed ventures behind it and revenues of $0.
This may get BHUB back to trading but I suggest a through Googling of Ms,. Dorrough is in order. None ZERO NADA of her business ventures have ever worked - something doesn't smell right.
Dude, you have got to be the biggest jackass I've seen post on this board lately. Your posts, like yourself, are full of chit & piss. It is quite obvious that you have no position in this stock, probably because you sold out because you had no balls to let it ride. Get a life and get lost with your 1-star rating.
Posts: 2554 | Registered: Nov 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
Dude - you must be one gullible dumb jackass if you don't see through this. If you can't figure this out on your own then your gonna ride TELA/BHUB down to .0001. I'm selling mine the first chance I can.
You live in disney land if you buy this story.
Posts: 27 | Registered: Apr 2007
| IP: Logged |
my first take is these BHUB guys/Yucatan would not want further regulatory attention if they just pulled the ol' switcheroo and profited from the Sparrow/Wong IDs...
Of course, as we know, con artists believe themselves somehow "bulletproof" and even entitled to returning to the well...
from what I'm seeing, (ie, no links other than those already posted), AS TA seems to be linked to other shady deals, which points away from BHUB/Yucatan. Unfortunately, that does not rule out anything--*if* they pulled a fast one, it's even possible they picked a TA known for either bending the rules OR incompetence.
lol, on the other, other hand...supposedly, allegedly, TELA has new storm-play assets coming on stream. In that sense, the possibility of having shares to trade beats the greys...
fwiw...
for sure, will follow: curiouser and curiouser, etc
posted
Sorry - I was out of line I take it back. Hope this turns out OK for those stuck with BHUB. Nite
Posts: 27 | Registered: Apr 2007
| IP: Logged |
posted
Tex, just saw your post just above mine. Let me know if I should remove my post. Don't want to start any trouble, but don't want people to take Willie's posts as that of a "stuck shareholder"
Posts: 5508 | From: Southeastern PA | Registered: Jan 2006
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by PCola77: Tex, just saw your post just above mine. Let me know if I should remove my post. Don't want to start any trouble, but don't want people to take Willie's posts as that of a "stuck shareholder"
lol, was about to PM you, explaining why I deleted your post...
peeps can feel stuck or not, as they choose...just not gonna devolve into muck, here...
posted
Understandable. I still think someone's representing themselves as someone that they are not, but I won't name names
Anyway, I'll let it drop.
quote:Originally posted by T e x:
quote:Originally posted by PCola77: Tex, just saw your post just above mine. Let me know if I should remove my post. Don't want to start any trouble, but don't want people to take Willie's posts as that of a "stuck shareholder"
lol, was about to PM you, explaining why I deleted your post...
peeps can feel stuck or not, as they choose...just not gonna devolve into muck, here...
Posts: 5508 | From: Southeastern PA | Registered: Jan 2006
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by williamjones: Sorry - I was out of line I take it back. Hope this turns out OK for those stuck with BHUB. Nite
Are you bi-polar? I just wasted about 10-15 minutes of my life going back and reading all your posts on this stock - and have come to the conclusion that you have more waffles than a Waffle House restaurant.
Posts: 2554 | Registered: Nov 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
thesource: IMO that's the right place to be. Not enough details to value this yet, but it will get us trading again fairly quick. As a ballpark guesstimate, I'd say there's no chance of us going over a dime anymore. The unregistered shares will become real--instead the right to sue will become an asset of the company. The short will go from something like 100X the float to between 1 and 3X the float.
But that still leaves plenty of squeeze and we're now a hurricane play with some actual retail outlets and we'll uplist to an OTCBB stock.
I'd say pennies is still a legitimate goal. The most important thing is we will trade again, probably in April, and the chance of a total loss just dropped to zero. (Yucutan proposed the deal and they own both companies, so if they want this to happen, it will happen.)
-------------------- Me Trade Pretty One Day. Posts: 815 | From: NYC | Registered: May 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
It's important to keep in mind the difference between a healthy skepticism and a conspiracy theory. This is a win-win for shareholders and Yucatan because it immediately cleans up BHUB for sale as a shell, resolves the unregistered share issue without compromising Yucatan's rights, and preserves the short squeeze for everyone.
-------------------- Me Trade Pretty One Day. Posts: 815 | From: NYC | Registered: May 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
The unregistered shares will become real--instead the right to sue will become an asset of the company. The short will go from something like 100X the float to between 1 and 3X the float. ???? yes this gets us trading agian but I think it is a fantasy to think that the 'right to sue' is an asset. This was a deal provided to the Dorroughs by DTC: We'll put BHUB shares back on the market as TELA but you can forget about suing anyone.
As far as real stores and a hurrican business - they have an agreement in place and that is all. Read the filings at Edgar - TELA has $0 in revenue . If, and when they own Storm Depot, they'll have to file that with the SEC - they do not own it now.
Posts: 27 | Registered: Apr 2007
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by williamjones: This was a deal provided to the Dorroughs by DTC: We'll put BHUB shares back on the market as TELA but you can forget about suing anyone.
Link please.
-------------------- Me Trade Pretty One Day. Posts: 815 | From: NYC | Registered: May 2006
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by tmanfromtexas: William, 2 or 3 days of trading is all any of us want I would assume, I know thats all I am hoping for. The thing to look for is the 8k from tela, saying its a done deal and how it is structured ie. restricted shares. (hmmmmm maybe another paiv. lol) another is the price of tela. many will look at that as the true value of bhub. whether it is or not is irrellevent in my mind. Its all about the perception that will make you money in plays like this. This is all MOMO. Everything else is just fluff. Have a great weekend. TMAN...
Wouldn't that be cool! Everybody starts buying because TELA is at .38...hahaha
posted
Can someone explain why IHub posts this POS as the No.#1 traded stock for Friday when trading was halted on Thursday??? This doesn't lend creedence to IHub's already damaged credibility.
Posts: 669 | From: Gouldsboro, Pa. | Registered: May 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
Just checking in at the hotel buisness center; WOW, it's been kinda busy around BHUB land han't it. Going to be veryinteresting to see how this one plays itself out. Since I haven't been watching for a few day's maybe I can get someones opinion, when do we feel that trading will resume? Is it going to be after the 10 days and under the BHUB symbol, or longer and under the new symbol?
-------------------- If ignorance is bliss, why aren't more people happy? Posts: 2647 | From: MN | Registered: Feb 2006
| IP: Logged |
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
Printer-friendly view of this topic
![[Eek!]](eek.gif)
![[Roll Eyes]](rolleyes.gif)
) the point, but instead clamping down on something that may spread exponentially. The "real" point is to "protect the system," imo... ![[Big Grin]](biggrin.gif)
![[Wink]](wink.gif)
