quote:Originally posted by behind the Q ball: when the gay games are aired the advertising slots will create a bidding war for the choicest spots, and lets not forget that if anyone in the world both on TV and radio (sattelite)wants to air any part of any event thay must pay Q. WE OWN THE RIGHTS
During the GG our signal will be scrambled so that many other stations will be able to show the games as well. But at what cost, I don't know.
IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Bottomliner: ltesprit Where is Lumberg, OH?
It's not on Google Local...
mjm I can't find it either. I'm from Ohio and have never heard of it, so I'm not sure it exists.
But a lot of people claim to be from Ohio ... because it gives them an "image of sophistication and intelligence". At least, that's why I continue to live here.
posted
I own a measly 13.5 mil shares of Q and I think it will stay that way. Most likely for good. That should be enough to make something you would think. If it was with any other network i'd be a billionaire, I don't know what I will be here, so far just a struggling investor. I'm holding to see where this goes. I can't bring myself to sell what costed me so much right now anyway. Its hard to just flush that kind of money out of my account, loss or not. GO TFN! (the fight network)
IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by MillerTIME: ... I would also like to comment on my negativity today. I do not want to alienate myself and have everyone hate me for my posts. My posts are only my opinion and things can change in a matter of a few PR's. I have no solid information of what is going on behind the scenes of QTN....I still would very much like to see the company suceed, LOL , if only for the fact to meet all of you guys in vegas.
MT Damn ... just when I find a reason to "hate" you, you go and say something nice. Now I'm all confused.
-------------------- Everything I say is only my opinion ... right or wrong.
IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by MillerTIME: ... I would also like to comment on my negativity today. I do not want to alienate myself and have everyone hate me for my posts. My posts are only my opinion and things can change in a matter of a few PR's. I have no solid information of what is going on behind the scenes of QTN....I still would very much like to see the company suceed, LOL , if only for the fact to meet all of you guys in vegas.
MT Damn ... just when I find a reason to "hate" you, you go and say something nice. Now I'm all confused.
Let's make the assumption that they are very successful, have many hours of programming, multiple state of the art studios and a good number of carriers.
I honestly think we will be there within a year, but the problem isn't the operations, it's the stock.
45 Billion confirmed in the OS, 100 billion AS, and a history of constantly increasing it. A CEO that blatantly misleads us and outright lies to us when asked straight forward questions (concerning his restricted shares, and the ownership of QTN by QBID.)
I think QTN will be successful, but I don't think QBID will ever pay out the way we wanted it to.
-------------------- "Please note that every week from now until the end of time is a 'coming week.' "
IP: Logged |
posted
Thanks Doc and Imak. I don't think anyone was too surprised about the NDAs, and it was great of you to choose the board over your own personal interests. (Your regret not withstanding...!)
I'm still fascinated by that news about Rich. I spoke with him at great length a few weeks ago and he was well aware of the shortcomings in this compay's corporate governance and how it affects the experienced investors/institutions perceptions and the pps. He expressed his frustration but reminded me that they keep his role limited on purpose. They can only feed him what they want shareholders to know. I suggested to Rich (and repeatedly to Frank via e-mail, which Frank had read according to Rich) that he (Rich) play a greater role in the company by professionalizing their IR and getting the company's governance policies up to exchange listing standards. Since Rich is moving to Burbank, I take that as a cue that Olsen is getting serious about such changes; I don't think Rich would consider such a move unless that were true.
I'm going to try to speak to Rich again and discuss this with him. His move is either a sign that the company is making big changes, or that Rich is a fool. I don't think Rich is a fool.
IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Numa: Here's my problem with Q...
Let's make the assumption that they are very successful, have many hours of programming, multiple state of the art studios and a good number of carriers.
I honestly think we will be there within a year, but the problem isn't the operations, it's the stock.
45 Billion confirmed in the OS, 100 billion AS, and a history of constantly increasing it. A CEO that blatantly misleads us and outright lies to us when asked straight forward questions (concerning his restricted shares, and the ownership of QTN by QBID.)
I think QTN will be successful, but I don't think QBID will ever pay out the way we wanted it to.
Hopefully Frank will voluntarily step up to the plate and present positive numbers. Then of course we will see the pps rise and be rewarded.
If not, and he is forced by legal actions, well then what happens at that point is anybody's guess.
IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by ltesprit: Thanks Doc and Imak. I don't think anyone was too surprised about the NDAs, and it was great of you to choose the board over your own personal interests. (Your regret not withstanding...!)
I'm still fascinated by that news about Rich. I spoke with him at great length a few weeks ago and he was well aware of the shortcomings in this compay's corporate governance and how it affects the experienced investors/institutions perceptions and the pps. He expressed his frustration but reminded me that they keep his role limited on purpose. They can only feed him what they want shareholders to know. I suggested to Rich (and repeatedly to Frank via e-mail, which Frank had read according to Rich) that he (Rich) play a greater role in the company by professionalizing their IR and getting the company's governance policies up to exchange listing standards. Since Rich is moving to Burbank, I take that as a cue that Olsen is getting serious about such changes; I don't think Rich would consider such a move unless that were true.
I'm going to try to speak to Rich again and discuss this with him. His move is either a sign that the company is making big changes, or that Rich is a fool. I don't think Rich is a fool.
Your post is very factual, over the past 3 days both Imakmony and I have had numerous telephone conversations with Richard, at least 4 while we were at the studios. Richard was rather surprised when I spoke to him about the move because he did not think that anyone knew about it yet.
-------------------- Be Careful Of The Toes We Step On Today, They Could Be Attached To The Butt We Have To Kiss Tomorrow
IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by ltesprit: Thanks Doc and Imak. I don't think anyone was too surprised about the NDAs, and it was great of you to choose the board over your own personal interests. (Your regret not withstanding...!)
I'm still fascinated by that news about Rich. I spoke with him at great length a few weeks ago and he was well aware of the shortcomings in this compay's corporate governance and how it affects the experienced investors/institutions perceptions and the pps. He expressed his frustration but reminded me that they keep his role limited on purpose. They can only feed him what they want shareholders to know. I suggested to Rich (and repeatedly to Frank via e-mail, which Frank had read according to Rich) that he (Rich) play a greater role in the company by professionalizing their IR and getting the company's governance policies up to exchange listing standards. Since Rich is moving to Burbank, I take that as a cue that Olsen is getting serious about such changes; I don't think Rich would consider such a move unless that were true.
I'm going to try to speak to Rich again and discuss this with him. His move is either a sign that the company is making big changes, or that Rich is a fool. I don't think Rich is a fool.
IT why do you keep raising hell and then come up with this? Geeez. What is up with you? This last post by you seemed intelligent and without emotion but you have been raising hell. Please stop the dramatics.
-------------------- don't sweat the small stuff.
IP: Logged |
It really sucks that yall went through all of that to get out there and have to choose between the meetings or posting on the boards. I think we can all be flattered that you chose the boards. Pretty ironic that Frank wants to make you sign a SEC binding agreement when he himself probably has a few things he wouldn't want the SEC to know about.
Thanks again to you and Mike for taking you time and funds for this trip and reporting back what you can.
quote:Originally posted by firefly: I hope not. Just got a 460 buck gas bill LOL
My last one was $306, but that was for the holiday season. Had family and friends over many nights.
And then of course, there was my little firecracker of a grand daughter. She's always waking up in the middle of the night from in between me and 'nanny hollering to turn the heat up because she's cold.
IP: Logged |
posted
You seem to have a lot to say for someone who doesn't have the balls to go to Q and find out for yourself. Just a little man with a big mouth! Enough said.
quote:Originally posted by Team Sleep: Knowing these two guys would leave the meeting and issue a report to shareholders and potential shareholders, what do you think the CEO was going to tell them?
It's just like when the Prez holds a press conference... does he ever tell us all the bad decisions and retarded, behind-the-scenes crap that goes on? Of course not!
While we all applaud their efforts for all the shareholders, lets keep an open mind that the CEO probably did not want to divulge anything remotely negative.
Topic Closed
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
Printer-friendly view of this topic
![[Big Grin]](biggrin.gif)
![[Wink]](wink.gif)
![[Smile]](smile.gif)
![[Frown]](frown.gif)
LOL
