quote:Originally posted by mjm2005: BL/QBIDCountry... pretty crazy, huh? I have to watch it again. It's messed up if the government was behind all of that... kind of Syriana-esque... I mean, I'm a, hmmm "conservative leaning moderate" I suppose, but that just is interesting...
mj Yep. Doesn't matter if we believe it all or not, it's information we can digest to form our own opinions.
Kinda like Q. We need to digest everything we read and hear, then form our own opinions based on our own unique situation. Decisions based on rumors, opinions and speculations are no better than decisions made in a vacuum.
Just soapboxing, everyone ... ignore me if you choose.
-------------------- Everything I say is only my opinion ... right or wrong.
IP: Logged |
posted
Although I'm not surprised at all. This sucks really bad. Anybody knows who that "investor and his family" is?
quote:Originally posted by mjm2005: SAN FRANCISCO Financial straits for gay TV network Q stops filming new shows, lays off some employees - Wyatt Buchanan, Chronicle Staff Writer Saturday, February 11, 2006
The Q Television Network, one of the three cable channels for gays and lesbians and the one that owns the broadcast rights for the Gay Games this summer, is struggling financially and has stopped running new programs -- until at least Monday.
The Southern California network -- which is available to 3 million cable subscribers in several cities, including San Francisco -- has not paid some of its workers, has laid off others and is being sued by a San Francisco lesbian magazine for not paying its advertising bills over a six-month period.
The Q Television Network launched in markets across the country in 2004, and was followed by MTV-backed Logo last summer. The first gay network, here, began broadcasting in 2002.
The chief administrators and board of directors of Q Television Network informed the staff Monday in an e-mail obtained by The Chronicle that an investor and his family with a large amount of money in the network "are no longer in a position to continue their financial commitment to Q Television."
"We know you are concerned about payroll," the e-mail began. It later stated that Q Television Network was "working with (backup investors) today to push this through as quickly as possible so that payroll can be completed." The e-mail was signed by the head of the company, Frank Olsen, along with Rene Schenk and Marion Sherman -- top officers -- and the "board of directors of QTN."
The network confirmed to the Web site Out.com that all contract workers had been laid off.
The network also has stopped filming new shows and instead is broadcasting recorded programs. Company officials declined to speak about the network's situation, but a company spokesman said the network expects to resume programming on Monday.
In early January, Girlfriends Magazine in San Francisco filed a lawsuit in San Francisco Superior Court claiming breach of contract. The network ran a series of full-page advertisements over six months in the monthly magazine but has yet to pay for any of them, said Jennifer Hagan, the magazine's attorney.
Editor Heather Findlay said the ads cost in the tens of thousands of dollars, although she would not say exactly how much.
The network is a major sponsor of the Gay Games and bought the broadcasting rights to air them for $1.7 million. So far, it has paid about 75 percent of that, said Kevin Boyer, co-vice chairman of the games that will be held in Chicago in July.
"They have told us that (the suspension of new programming) is a normal, planned production hiatus to plan for the Gay Games," Boyer said. The network has planned to broadcast several hours of the games each day, some of it live, he said. That has never been done before.
"They have been a good partner with us, and we will believe them till we have reason to believe otherwise," he said.
Meanwhile, stock in Q Television is trading at one-100th of a cent.
E-mail Wyatt Buchanan at wbuchanan*sfchronicle.com.
posted
Monkey, you around? Need a fishing update on the Albacore...Just might be making a trip to Southern California on biz...[ L.A ,,Long Beach and San Diego ]
IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Dustoff101: Bottomliner, If it smells like a skunk, looks like a skunk, and lays in the road stinking to High Heaven like a dead skunk?
Well, it's a SKUNK!
350,000,000,000 shares and the printing machine is a smoking, baby!
When ya going to get it?
I got banned, when and because I started a Howling about this mess at .0018
To even think about buying this thing now is just supporting a ripoff heading for even bigger trouble..
Dustoff I respect your opinions and your thoughts, so please evaluate my response just as fairly:
Let's start with your skunk example. If you tell me there is a dead "skunk" on the road, I cannot know it's fact until I verify it for myself. Even if I trust your honesty, I can't be sure that you know what a skunk is. So, to be absolutely sure, I have to see the carcass for myself.
Based on my personal knowledge of skunks, which was developed from my personal experiences with skunks, I believe I can recognize a skunk by both sight and smell, and I very likely will label the carcass as a "skunk", just as you did.
However, without testing the creature's DNA, neither of us can be sure it really is a skunk. It could be a close relative.
Now, does it matter to either of us if we incorrectly label this creature as a skunk? Will any future event be changed if we are wrong? Probably not, so calling the roadkill a skunk without absolute proof doesn't hurt either of us.
In Q's case, we may think we see and smell a "skunk", we may reasonably label it as a "skunk", and we may be right that it is a "skunk". But what are the consequenses of being wrong?
This brings us to the decision process. We have to evaluate each decision choice based on each existing possibility:
-If I sell my shares now and Q turns out to be a "skunk", I have protected what is left of my investment. -If I sell my shares now and Q turns out not to be a "skunk", I may miss potential gains.
-If I hold my shares and Q turns out to be a "skunk", I risk losing what is left of my investment. -If I hold my shares and Q turns out not to be a "skunk", I may end up making money on my investment.
Which decision you make depends on your personal and unique situation: Some people need to protect what they have left and "probably" should sell. Some people won't miss the money and may want to continue to gamble. It all depends on "your" situation. I understand there is a big difference between spending rent money on Q and spending a fraction of an inherited fortune. It's the same scenario as gambling in Vegas. Gamble or invest only with what you can afford to lose, because there aren't many "sure things" in the world.
Making decisions really isn't that difficult if you accept the fact that you won't be right every time. Just be sure the consequences of your decision don't bite you in the butt.
You (and others) keep telling me "I don't get it", and I keep saying that decisions have to be made on facts. I think I am being objective, rational and sensible by not reacting to rumors, speculations and opinions. If selling at this PPS made sense to me, I would. And I might think selling makes sense if the PPS rises any significant amount. Again, I try to make decisions based on facts and common sense instead of on assumptions and fear.
Based on your comments, I am guessing you no longer own Q shares. I don't have enough facts to know for sure, but based on your "skunk" theory, I assume that anyone who believes Q is a "skunk" would not continue to hold shares. If you still do own shares, then my guess is wrong ... and your "skunk" theory also is wrong.
I have never advised anyone to buy or sell Q shares, even in the good old days. And I won't start now. All I've ever done is point out the choices available to all of us. Again, I think I have always been objective, rational and sensible.
Well, enough soapboxing for now ... but one more thing:
I don't think that hoping or dreaming or seeing the glass half full instead of half empty is wrong as long as I continue to make decisions based only on facts. And thinking positively helps me sleep better at night. But everyone has to do what is right for them.
GL to us all. We sure could use some. And that's a fact.
[ February 11, 2006, 15:36: Message edited by: Bottomliner ]
-------------------- Everything I say is only my opinion ... right or wrong.
IP: Logged |
imakmony2005
unregistered
posted
Wait,BL you telling me this might go down and begone just like CMKX hold the phone, God IF YOU DONT GET THAT THIS IS A (PINKIE) YOU GET WHAT YOU GET. LOL -BIG RISK BIG REWARD ARE BIG 0
IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by imakmony2005: Wait,BL you telling me this might go down and begone just like CMKX hold the phone, God IF YOU DONT GET THAT THIS IS A (PINKIE) YOU GET WHAT YOU GET. LOL -BIG RISK BIG REWARD ARE BIG 0
imak I think I understand what you are saying ... but just in case ...
I don't know what is going to happen with Q. I can only hope and dream and wait. GL to us all.
-------------------- Everything I say is only my opinion ... right or wrong.
IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Dustoff101: Bottomliner, If it smells like a skunk, looks like a skunk, and lays in the road stinking to High Heaven like a dead skunk?
Well, it's a SKUNK!
350,000,000,000 shares and the printing machine is a smoking, baby!
When ya going to get it?
I got banned, when and because I started a Howling about this mess at .0018
To even think about buying this thing now is just supporting a ripoff heading for even bigger trouble..
Dustoff I respect your opinions and your thoughts, so please evaluate my response just as fairly:
Let's start with your skunk example. If you tell me there is a dead "skunk" on the road, I cannot know it's fact until I verify it for myself. Even if I trust your honesty, I can't be sure that you know what a skunk is. So, to be absolutely sure, I have to see the carcass for myself.
Based on my personal knowledge of skunks, which was developed from my personal experiences with skunks, I believe I can recognize a skunk by both sight and smell, and I very likely will label the carcass as a "skunk", just as you did.
However, without testing the creature's DNA, neither of us can be sure it really is a skunk. It could be a close relative.
Now, does it matter to either of us if we incorrectly label this creature as a skunk? Will any future event be changed if we are wrong? Probably not, so calling the roadkill a skunk without absolute proof doesn't hurt either of us.
In Q's case, we may think we see and smell a "skunk", we may reasonably label it as a "skunk", and we may be right that it is a "skunk". But what are the consequenses of being wrong?
This brings us to the decision process. We have to evaluate each decision choice based on each existing possibility:
-If I sell my shares now and Q turns out to be a "skunk", I have protected what is left of my investment. -If I sell my shares now and Q turns out not to be a "skunk", I may miss potential gains.
-If I hold my shares and Q turns out to be a "skunk", I risk losing what is left of my investment. -If I hold my shares and Q turns out not to be a "skunk", I may end up making money on my investment.
Which decision you make depends on your personal and unique situation: Some people need to protect what they have left and "probably" should sell. Some people won't miss the money and may want to continue to gamble. It all depends on "your" situation. I understand there is a big difference between spending rent money on Q and spending a fraction of an inherited fortune. It's the same scenario as gambling in Vegas. Gamble or invest only with what you can afford to lose, because there aren't many "sure things" in the world.
Making decisions really isn't that difficult if you accept the fact that you won't be right every time. Just be sure the consequences of your decision don't bite you in the butt.
You (and others) keep telling me "I don't get it", and I keep saying that decisions have to be made on facts. I think I am being objective, rational and sensible by not reacting to rumors, speculations and opinions. If selling at this PPS made sense to me, I would. And I might think selling makes sense if the PPS rises any significant amount. Again, I try to make decisions based on facts and common sense instead of on assumptions and fear.
Based on your comments, I am guessing you no longer own Q shares. I don't have enough facts to know for sure, but based on your "skunk" theory, I assume that anyone who believes Q is a "skunk" would not continue to hold shares. If you still do own shares, then my guess is wrong ... and your "skunk" theory also is wrong.
I have never advised anyone to buy or sell Q shares, even in the good old days. And I won't start now. All I've ever done is point out the choices available to all of us. Again, I think I have always been objective, rational and sensible.
Well, enough soapboxing for now ... but one more thing:
I don't think that hoping or dreaming or seeing the glass half full instead of half empty is wrong as long as I continue to make decisions based only on facts. And thinking positively helps me sleep better at night. But everyone has to do what is right for them.
GL to us all. We sure could use some. And that's a fact.
Damn BL...are you a Professor of Psychology
so instead of BL.. you are now PBL
-------------------- Sometimes the poorest man leaves his children the richest inheritance.
IP: Logged |
Off topic, but interesting video for anyone that's interested. It's long... so break it up... it got me hooked...I have to watch it a second time...
Well i just got through watching this and boy howdy. Not quite sure what to think accept i said something like this after it happend.
Something similar like this happend in WWII. The pearl harbor invasion could have been less damaging or possibly even stopped but the gov't had to let it happen to get unilateral support to join the war and get "money" for spending.
Porhibition, a billion dollar industry in the 1920's (think about the date and the money), the people who enacted the law probably made the most money on the whole deal.
only thing i can think to say is, scary.
-------------------- M.M. Semester #3 started,Only 7 more semesters to go. Why, in an age where information is so easy to get, cant we find information on one man. Experience is something you dont get until just after you need it.
IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Dustoff101: BL, quit being such a logical Adult, you are going to scare the hell atta folks around here!!
Then they really will start too worrying...LOL
BTW, my logic tells me it's a skunk..But no problem dude..Still LOL
Also, that was a very good post. Only problem? It was illogical in my opinion..LOL
For new people....LOL means laughing out loud! not lots of love damnit! LMAO
Dusty Wait till you find out I am only 12-years-old.
And I really thought LOL meant "lots of love" so I'm sorry I've been nice to you.
Anyway, just for the record, I don't disagree with you about Q "smelling" right now. This sure isn't where I would like Q to be. And I have no idea where it will be next week, mext month or next year. And the main reason I am holding my shares right now is because I don't believe selling at .0001 is worth my efforts, since the amount I would net is pretty small.
So I will continue to hold and hope and wait for whatever comes.
And I keep telling myself that it ain't over till the "fat man sings" ... and I don't think Frank has the voice for that, so there is still hope.
GL to us all.
-------------------- Everything I say is only my opinion ... right or wrong.
IP: Logged |
-------------------- M.M. Semester #3 started,Only 7 more semesters to go. Why, in an age where information is so easy to get, cant we find information on one man. Experience is something you dont get until just after you need it.
IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Dustoff101: OK, here goes....
Logical chart analysis led me to believe many months ago that an undervalued condition did not exsist here.
Charts are really the only concrete tool we have to work with re-garding this stock.
The Math led to see the exsistance of massive dilution..
The Art of logic, is an easy thing to understand, because in actuality it only seeks out a reasonable explaination to an event.
Sherlock Holmes "Once you have eliminated the impossible, then all that remains is your answer."
-------------------- M.M. Semester #3 started,Only 7 more semesters to go. Why, in an age where information is so easy to get, cant we find information on one man. Experience is something you dont get until just after you need it.
IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Dustoff101: Bottomliner, you are obviously well educated and thoughtful, with an understanding of logic, if not plenty of academic study...
Thats why I have such a problem with your logic..
How in the World could you have allowed yourself to take the huge drop with this stock.? Or did you?
Again BL I DO NOT OWN THIS STOCK. But have made big bucks on it in the past...
Dusty Thank you for the kind words. And I think you have answered some of your own questions.
Although I admit I've misjudged Q (or Frank) a bit along the way and never thought it would be where it is today, I haven't held on blindly while it dipped. I won't try to convince anyone of my "financial brilliance", but I have made a little money along the way. And I haven't invested more than I can afford to lose (I really don't think I needed that kidney transplant anyway).
Although I admit I am "behind" now, it wouldn't take much for me to recover a chunk of my losses.
I've posted many times that I am a poker player and that I invest in stocks with pretty much the same strategy (I can almost hear Warren Buffett groaning). I usually play premium hands to reduce the risk, but I also will play weak hands if the pot odds are right (which means the reward is high enough to offset the risk). Playing pot odds doesn't mean I have a better chance of winning that particular hand ... but when I do get lucky and win, I make a bundle, which offsets the many times I will lose such hands.
If that sounds goofy ... I understand, because playing pot odds was the toughest concept for me to accept. Now, I "think" I understand it. The bottomline is that you don't have to win every hand ... in poker or stocks ... to end up a winner. If Q goes sour on me, I will move to a different game (I already have other stocks working for me) and hope I do better.
But damn Lady Luck ... you just cannot trust a woman.
DISCLAIMER: I apologize to all my female friends at allstocks. But I couldn't think of a better ending to my message. Sorry ...
-------------------- Everything I say is only my opinion ... right or wrong.
IP: Logged |
Something similar like this happend in WWII. The pearl harbor invasion could have been less damaging or possibly even stopped but the gov't had to let it happen to get unilateral support to join the war and get "money" for spending.
[/QB]
Is this what they teach in school these days? Unreal.
IP: Logged |
Something similar like this happend in WWII. The pearl harbor invasion could have been less damaging or possibly even stopped but the gov't had to let it happen to get unilateral support to join the war and get "money" for spending.
Is this what they teach in school these days? Unreal. [/QB]
No, its called formulting my own opinion from historical resources, the sequence of events that occured, and the social and policitcal situations of the time. WWII saved this country no matter which way you look at it, it was something that was prepared for and as well as something that needed to happen.
-------------------- M.M. Semester #3 started,Only 7 more semesters to go. Why, in an age where information is so easy to get, cant we find information on one man. Experience is something you dont get until just after you need it.
IP: Logged |
posted
I literally laughed out loud when I read this again...hahahhaha -----------------------------------
LEAD Series featuring Frank Olsen, President/CEO, Q Television Network
Wednesday, June 1, 2005 5:00 p.m. - 6:00 p.m.
Location: Commons, University Terrace Room A Parking Information
Category: Lecture Event Photo Description: The LEAD Series (Leadership Exploration And Development) is a chance to learn from experienced leaders working in education, business, non-profit and government. To assist students in further developing their leadership potential, they will be able to hear first hand about the challenges these experienced leaders have encountered and the path that led them to their current leadership role. Participants will also have an opportunity to ask any questions they may have that are relevant to their leadership development.
The 2005 LEAD Series will be held one Wednesday evening per month during the Winter and Spring Quarters from 5:00-6:00 p.m. Light refreshments will be provided.
June featured Presenter: Frank Olsen, President/CEO of Q Television Network
About the Presenter: Frank Olsen is President/CEO of Q Television Network, a subsidiary of Triangle Multi-Media Limited, Inc. Mr. Olsen has been in the broadcasting industry for over 35 years and has helped shape minority programming. He created Q Television Network to provide quality programming for and about the gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender communities around the world. Mr. Olsen previously launched the first radio station focused on African Americans and their culture in Seattle. He entered the television arena with a four-hour home shopping program which was the forerunner of the current home shopping channels. He was president of The Hospitality Movie Channel which he sold that business to Showtime/Viacom. In addition to his broadcasting ventures, Mr. Olsen has also worked in the LGBT communities, starting 17 clubs centered on LGBT entertainment. His wealth of experience in broadcasting and business, combined with his creativity, has helped him bring Q Television Network to a national audience and create the premiere LGBT television network of his dreams.
Additional Information: Open to: Students/Faculty/Staff Only Admission: Free Sponsor: Student Life
Contact Information: Student Life 951/827-7344 ucrlife*ucr.edu
-------------------- Remember two things: You love New York City and leave only your footprints.
IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by MoneyMoneyMoney: lol, obviously not a preteen otherwise how do you know about women when middle school kids all split into genders. lol. haha
And that much on a skunk? We all know we have to make our own decisions so why explain yourself at all? lol.
And you are playing illegally double time. Underage and against US laws. I wouldn't admit to it.
Gl to QBID as I always like to see rich Allstock members. GL big time, you'll need it.
MMM Okay, you got me. I'm actually a little older than 12 ... so I am not underage.
But what did you mean by "you are playing illegally ... Underage and against US laws." I don't understand the "US laws" part.
-------------------- Everything I say is only my opinion ... right or wrong.
IP: Logged |
Frank Olsen dubbed himself the "King Of Gay Media"
FINANCIAL PROBLEMS PLAGUE 'Q' TELEVISION The QBID Scam Continues ... To The metroG Editor February 12, 2006
Yes I said scam. A pump and dump pink sheet scam. After several name changes since 1999 and many broken promises along with the dumping of billions of worthless pink sheet shares onto unsuspecting gay and straight investors Frank Olsen and his venture capital friends and a group of paid stock promoters are at it again. Planting a story in the press claiming that financial problems plague 'Q' Television is all part of a continues cycle of fraud and deceit.
Where has all the money gone? First off the symbol being traded today on the pink sheet stock market is QBID and is registered as Triangle Multi-Media Inc. (OTCF: QBID). This means when you buy QBID shares you are buying shares of Triangle Multi-Media Inc. and NOT 'Q' Television Network shares. 'Q' Television Network shares are un-issued and it is against the law to offer them to the general public.
So what happens next? "Frank The Fraud" -- who dubbed himself "The King of Gay Media" -- takes Triangle Multi-Media Inc. into bankruptcy and emerges out as 'Q' Television Network with new shares. The gay community should be boycotting not rewarding such criminal behavior.
If you bought QBID one would think you were buying 'Q' Television Network stock but in fact you are getting shares of Triangle Multi-Media Inc. (OTCF: QBID). Beware!
I saw your front page articles on the metroG website and am wondering what is going on? It is very strange to see the whole front page of a supposed news agency devoted to smearing a company and I am curious why you are doing this? Let me remind you that Q Television Network (wholly owned by QBID and QBID shareholders) has received carriage by Time Warner, Verizon, COX Communications, RCN and Bright House. Do you, for one second, think that these national carriers would waste their time with a scam company that had nothing to offer? I don't think so. Consider Time Warner, for example. They began about a year ago with carriage in Rochester and Syracuse, NY. If QBID were a scam as you so boldly assert, do you think that Time Warner would have added carriage in half-a-dozen other locations across the country since then? Same thing with RCN; began in San Francisco and has since added Boston, Chicago, Manhattan plus a few others. You are obviously on a vendetta of some kind. I hope that the company takes you to court and clarifies what your motives are. I very much doubt if they are honorable. Sincerely, ~ John T. Berg, Ph.D. (Investor and supporter of Q Television Network)
-------------------- Sometimes the poorest man leaves his children the richest inheritance.
IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Rich735: I emailed the metrog story to Rich Brown!
Oh yeah, where's he work'n now?
These stories are becoming to frequent. It is like a snowball that keep getting bigger. If QBID DOESN'T come out with any kind of REBUTTAL, then we as shareholder can only begin to believe these stories to be TRUE.
We haven't heard a peep out of QBID since last October. Except for the fact that the common shareholders now own 100% of QBID. I guess if one wanted to start a conspiracy theroy, one could say; "Whis is it NOW that the shareholders own 100% of the company?..... Because someone got rid of their FINANCIAL ties to QBID KNOWING that it was going to going to be WORTHLESS and maybe BANKRUPT soon!
The commom shareholders (us) know NOTHING expect we are watching our investment disappear. I don't know what to believe anymore, but my beliefs of QBID are turning more negative and I feel that we are going to be sacaficed at some point. If 350B doesn't show this, then I don't know what does!
Again, I HOPE and PRAY for the POSITIVE for I really don't want to see my 11K vanished.
posted
Wish I had sold when "bashers" were screaming sell sell. I wish I had listened to "father of two" when this piece of crap was still at 0.0008. Live and learn...
quote:Originally posted by mjm2005:
metroG NewsLines From metroG & our news affiliates ...
Frank Olsen dubbed himself the "King Of Gay Media"
FINANCIAL PROBLEMS PLAGUE 'Q' TELEVISION The QBID Scam Continues ... To The metroG Editor February 12, 2006
Yes I said scam. A pump and dump pink sheet scam. After several name changes since 1999 and many broken promises along with the dumping of billions of worthless pink sheet shares onto unsuspecting gay and straight investors Frank Olsen and his venture capital friends and a group of paid stock promoters are at it again. Planting a story in the press claiming that financial problems plague 'Q' Television is all part of a continues cycle of fraud and deceit.
Where has all the money gone? First off the symbol being traded today on the pink sheet stock market is QBID and is registered as Triangle Multi-Media Inc. (OTCF: QBID). This means when you buy QBID shares you are buying shares of Triangle Multi-Media Inc. and NOT 'Q' Television Network shares. 'Q' Television Network shares are un-issued and it is against the law to offer them to the general public.
So what happens next? "Frank The Fraud" -- who dubbed himself "The King of Gay Media" -- takes Triangle Multi-Media Inc. into bankruptcy and emerges out as 'Q' Television Network with new shares. The gay community should be boycotting not rewarding such criminal behavior.
If you bought QBID one would think you were buying 'Q' Television Network stock but in fact you are getting shares of Triangle Multi-Media Inc. (OTCF: QBID). Beware!
quote:Originally posted by mjm2005: Posted by: lobogotti In reply to: None Date:2/12/2006 1:32:02 AM Post #of 11847
metroG NewsLines From metroG & our news affiliates ...
Frank Olsen dubbed himself the "King Of Gay Media"
FINANCIAL PROBLEMS PLAGUE 'Q' TELEVISION The QBID Scam Continues ... To The metroG Editor February 12, 2006
Yes I said scam. A pump and dump pink sheet scam. After several name changes since 1999 and many broken promises along with the dumping of billions of worthless pink sheet shares onto unsuspecting gay and straight investors Frank Olsen and his venture capital friends and a group of paid stock promoters are at it again. Planting a story in the press claiming that financial problems plague 'Q' Television is all part of a continues cycle of fraud and deceit.
Where has all the money gone? First off the symbol being traded today on the pink sheet stock market is QBID and is registered as Triangle Multi-Media Inc. (OTCF: QBID). This means when you buy QBID shares you are buying shares of Triangle Multi-Media Inc. and NOT 'Q' Television Network shares. 'Q' Television Network shares are un-issued and it is against the law to offer them to the general public.
So what happens next? "Frank The Fraud" -- who dubbed himself "The King of Gay Media" -- takes Triangle Multi-Media Inc. into bankruptcy and emerges out as 'Q' Television Network with new shares. The gay community should be boycotting not rewarding such criminal behavior.
If you bought QBID one would think you were buying 'Q' Television Network stock but in fact you are getting shares of Triangle Multi-Media Inc. (OTCF: QBID). Beware!
This reporter knows this information like he knows how to spell. He is speculating like all the rest.
.....scam my azz!
Personally I believe that if Frank wanted to f*ck us, yeah he would file for bankruptcy. But we would have already learned of the bankruptcy by now.....before the restructuring announcement, not after.
Why would Frank, having lawsuits and debts, file AFTER restructuring?
Would the carriers, the GG Federation and celebrities really continue their involvement if indeed this was a scam? Their legal hounds would have smelled it a mile away.
Aside the risk of all these enormous entertainment entities who "still continue" their affiliation with Q, Carol Hinnant ALONE, Q's media powerhouse in maintaining relationships with corporate level and system level affiliates, in my mind, would not jeopardize her carrier in such a claim.
Again, people this is a long. You just got to have patience and let this thing roll out.
IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Dustoff101: OK, here goes....
Logical chart analysis led me to believe many months ago that an undervalued condition did not exsist here.
Charts are really the only concrete tool we have to work with re-garding this stock.
The Math led me to see the exsistance of massive dilution..
The Art of logic, is an easy thing to understand, because in actuality it only seeks out a reasonable explaination to an event.
Dustoff Just re-reading some posts and found this one. Must have missed it yesterday.
I admit that most charting systems seem like a Rorschach Ink Blot Test to me ... everyone sees something different and everyone thinks they are correct. I also admit that I don't know enough about charting systems to use them.
In the past, I've let the "experts" explain their charts to me, but usually the charts ... oddly enough ... predicted different outcomes. Since all possible occurrences cannot be right, I had to assume some were wrong. And that's the problem: which ones do I believe?
Let me know which charts you believe in, and I will spend some time educating myself on how they work. I really would like to find a tool (or "crystal ball") to help me make some stock market bucks.
Gotta go. Playing another Holdem tournament today but will be back tonight. And as always ... GL to us all.
-------------------- Everything I say is only my opinion ... right or wrong.
IP: Logged |
I saw your front page articles on the metroG website and am wondering what is going on? It is very strange to see the whole front page of a supposed news agency devoted to smearing a company and I am curious why you are doing this? Let me remind you that Q Television Network (wholly owned by QBID and QBID shareholders) has received carriage by Time Warner, Verizon, COX Communications, RCN and Bright House. Do you, for one second, think that these national carriers would waste their time with a scam company that had nothing to offer? I don't think so. Consider Time Warner, for example. They began about a year ago with carriage in Rochester and Syracuse, NY. If QBID were a scam as you so boldly assert, do you think that Time Warner would have added carriage in half-a-dozen other locations across the country since then? Same thing with RCN; began in San Francisco and has since added Boston, Chicago, Manhattan plus a few others. You are obviously on a vendetta of some kind. I hope that the company takes you to court and clarifies what your motives are. I very much doubt if they are honorable. Sincerely, ~ John T. Berg, Ph.D. (Investor and supporter of Q Television Network)
credit where credit due....industrious ihub poster....
Posted by: uwlungman In reply to: None Date:2/12/2006 2:13:50 AM Post #of 221069
email sent to metroG... To talkback*metrog.com , <talkback*metrog.com> Subject Few questions from QBID investor.
Topic Closed
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
Printer-friendly view of this topic
![[Cool]](cool.gif)
![[Big Grin]](biggrin.gif)
![[Eek!]](eek.gif)
![[Smile]](smile.gif)
![[Frown]](frown.gif)
![[Wink]](wink.gif)
OK here is some GOOD NEWS for a change!!
