quote:Originally posted by Doctoall: If I were in a lawsuit and owed that kind of money, the last thing that I would be doing is releasing an audit, that shows my worth.
Good call. If I were Frank, I wouldn't release an audit until, at the very earliest, they stated the amount they were trying to recover.
Best case, he releases it now that they've already named their price. Worst case, we have to wait till this thing is settled.
Posts: 369 | Registered: Dec 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
ok..so i guess the last time i was at the studios and frank was with his lawyers..this is why.. like he said...when we see the audit theres gonna be some things that we dont like ,and lawsuits are some of them. all these names hes using is under tmm...and thats what we have the stock for. its almost like were set on a decoy of qtn when really we need to know all about tmm. frank obviously laundered money from prior businesses to fund this project...the question is,,,,while he ripped off a bunch of people,how much money is the real debt in total ? i feel we definately need to know these things .now i fully understand why the price is at .0002 . theres no real figures to look at.and the market knows best how to play with our money. so if we dont come clean quick before feb. 2006 ,,,then frank is gonna lose this whole thing...the good news is....frank lawyer is gary goldman..*************..lol. lawsuits are nothing..there just a waste of time to try and get some money. who cares if frank owes 15 million dollars if the real value for qtn is 200 million... im gonna tell all my qbidians straight up.. frank told me he thinks its gonna go to .0050 to .0075 . at this point ,ill be happy with seeing .0015 ... but i wouldnt mind anything higher if it goes to 1 penny i make 400 k... ill send everyone on this board a bottle of cristall.. if and only if this actually goes through.. we will be very fortunate..whether its with our patience and pride...or our moet and strawberries in our mouth.
[ December 14, 2005, 16:38: Message edited by: Doctoall ]
Posts: 414 | From: los angeles | Registered: Aug 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
by the way ..the majority of these stupid lawsuits thats are filed against frank are for small claims.less than 5 g's... give me a break. i think i like the idea of frank rippin a couple of businesses off to get his way..it shows he can get a good deal..even if he has to rip u off..lol.
Posts: 414 | From: los angeles | Registered: Aug 2005
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by davidjanas: by the way ..the majority of these stupid lawsuits thats are filed against frank are for small claims.less than 5 g's... give me a break. i think i like the idea of frank rippin a couple of businesses off to get his way..it shows he can get a good deal..even if he has to rip u off..lol.
DJ I was just thinking about you. Why don't you grab a few friends of yours and head down to the studio, and in a controled manner, picket in front of the studio for Frank to step down.
***************
Frank man, I've given you all the respect, but after knowing what I know now, you need to hand over the reigns asap.
It's like Doc said, you will eventually bleed us to death if you don't step down. Sorry bro...but I'll still buy you a cold one when we get to Vegas. Posts: 1236 | From: The Bluegrass State | Registered: Sep 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
Hellfire...before its over, Jenn might be sending Frank a cheesecake with a file in it if you know what I mean. Posts: 1236 | From: The Bluegrass State | Registered: Sep 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
well its not over yet. we are still above .0001 and we still trade hundreds of millions a day.
someone somewhere is buying this thing. i dont know who but i would like to think its frank.
it has gotten awfully gloomy lately and im hoping the qbid sky's get a little sunshine sooner than later.
as of now i see nothing we can do at this point other than wait this out. if we were to start filing more lawsuits would that help out our case? i say no. that will only add to the complications that frank is already dealing with.
if nothing else i have had a blast with qbid it has been a nervewracking experience at times and gave me high hopes other times. i still am holding on tight at this point in hopes qbid one day turns around. but if this goes down the toiletta for good then this was an expensive soap to watch(32k) hehe.
best of luck to you all.
sincerely your patient qbidiot.
22 million long and strong.
-------------------- gotta know when to hold em and when to .......... Posts: 1525 | Registered: Mar 2005
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by QBID'n: Hellfire...before its over, Jenn might be sending Frank a cheesecake with a file in it if you know what I mean.
Do you think he would want his soap on or off a rope?
Now that was funny! I think I wet myself!
-------------------- A good friend will bail you out of Jail. A great friend will be sitting next to you saying... Damn that was fun! :) Posts: 3353 | Registered: Nov 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
File a lawsuit?...ahhhahaha Good luck! We would just have to stand in line.
Nah..I'm with you Noah, we'll just have to wait this chapter out.
And to be honest, it wouldn't surprise me to see Frank rolling this thing out regardless. He sure as hell got the experience. Posts: 1236 | From: The Bluegrass State | Registered: Sep 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
Don't laugh too soon FOT...it aint over till its over, and Frank just may have the last laugh on you! lol Posts: 1236 | From: The Bluegrass State | Registered: Sep 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
DJ A lawyer is a lawyer is a lawyer, enough said.
[ December 14, 2005, 17:14: Message edited by: Doctoall ]
-------------------- Be Careful Of The Toes We Step On Today, They Could Be Attached To The Butt We Have To Kiss Tomorrow Posts: 4727 | From: Elk Grove ( Sacramento )CA USA | Registered: Jun 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
Didn't one of the items in the suit mention Frank providing 50% of HIS shares? If hat did transpire, does that mean he is now only owning 26.5% of interest in QBID? ....interesting. A coupe may be lining up and a new leader may emerge....possibly why all the hush hush.
-------------------- One Lucky SOB Posts: 74 | From: Lacey Twp, NJ | Registered: Aug 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
if that is the case someone with a chunk of change can take majority ownership. hmmmmmmmmm..............maybe elton john will be our new ceo hehehe.
good luck to you all tommorrow is another day.
i miss those days of us thinking a dollar a share was around the corner. it still could happen but not with this many shares authorized and outstanding. we need massive buybacks and share retirement.
i guess its more than all we have to do is launch. hmmmmmmmmmmmm................
-------------------- gotta know when to hold em and when to .......... Posts: 1525 | Registered: Mar 2005
| IP: Logged |
-------------------- Be Careful Of The Toes We Step On Today, They Could Be Attached To The Butt We Have To Kiss Tomorrow Posts: 4727 | From: Elk Grove ( Sacramento )CA USA | Registered: Jun 2004
| IP: Logged |
If they want half of his shares, plus the 500,000,000 they have, plus the 6,000,000,000 more ($1.7mill at current market value), Firestone would be the majority shareholder by far.
And what was that about restructuring, anyway?
As an aside, where did you guys get the 60 Bill O/S estimates from?
Posts: 369 | Registered: Dec 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
Gay Ads Back On Track For Ford by 365Gay.com Newscenter Staff
Posted: December 14, 2005 5:00 pm ET
(Washington) Ford Motor Company on Wednesday agreed to almost all demands from LGBT groups following a hastily organized meeting earlier this week with the company over a claim by the American Family Association that the company had made a pact with it to end support of the LGBT community.
The AFA said it was ending a threatened boycott of Ford after the company agreed to pull advertising from the gay media and to stop funding LGBT organizations.
On Monday Ford met with LGBT leaders in a Washington hotel to hear their concerns about the AFA statement. (story)
In a statement released Wednesday afternoon, Ford said that it would feature all of its brands in a 2006 ad campaign in LGBT publications. Previously Ford was advertising only its Land Rover and Jaguar brands in the gay press.
-------------------- Be Careful Of The Toes We Step On Today, They Could Be Attached To The Butt We Have To Kiss Tomorrow Posts: 4727 | From: Elk Grove ( Sacramento )CA USA | Registered: Jun 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
The arhchbishops lawsuit against QTN....sorry its long....
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LUZERNE COUNTY
Benedictine Enterprises, LLC : Plaintiff : Civil Number: 13447-2005 : : : Vs. : : Q Television Network, Inc. : Defendant : :
COMPLAINT
PARTIES
1. The plaintiff, Benedictine Enterprises, LLC, a Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Limited Liability Corporation and at all times relevant hereto, headquartered in Luzerne County with an address of 216 Division St., Hanover Township, PA 18706. 2. The defendant, Q Television Network, Inc., at all times relevant hereto is a California Corporation and is authorized to do business as a foreign corporation in the Commonwealth, and is subject to service of process by and through its registered agent: Gary Goldman, 2082 S. Madrona Dry, Palm Springs, CA 92264. Frank Olsen AKA Frank Olson is the President of Q Television Network, Inc. FACTS 3. On or about June 17, 2005, the plaintiff and defendant entered into a written contract, a copy of which is attached hereto, made a part hereof, and is marked as Exhibit A (hereinafter referred to as the contract). Said contract provides that the laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania shall govern the contract. 4. Pursuant to the contract, the plaintiff agreed to co-produce a television show with Archbishop Bruce J. Simpson, OSJB, acting originally as a co-host of the show, dealing with current news and religion topics in conjunction with the defendant. Plaintiff actually became the only host of the show. The first season required 27 shows of 55 minutes in length each, to be produced with two one-year renewal options. The defendant agreed to co-produce said show under the above agreed upon terms, and further to pay the plaintiff the amount of twenty-five hundred dollars ($2500) per episode for the first 13 shows with an increase in payment per show for the remaining 14 shows of the 27 show first season. Defendant also agreed to “pay all travel expenses to include first class airfare, top hotel rooms and limo transfers and food and other related expenses for Simpson.” The parties agreed upon rerun compensation as well as sharing proceeds from any sales of merchandising aspects of the show. Defendant also agreed to pay a one-time $2500 signing fee to the plaintiff upon execution of the contract, as well as other terms not in contention here. 5. On or about September 1, 2005, the defendant breached the contract by refusing to schedule the remaining shooting dates for further taping of the show that came to be called, “The Bishop’s Roundtable.” Over the course of the next 3 months, defendant continued to engage in a game of delay and subterfuge by stating that we were to resume shooting, but never in fact doing so. This conduct is clearly evidenced in the attached exhibits showing e-mail between the plaintiff and defendant or its agents. The first taping of the initial two shows took place on August 1, 2005, in Blue Bell Pennsylvania at the television studios of Unisys Studios. The Production Supervisor for the defendant was sent to Blue Bell to oversee the shows. That night the defendant contacted the plaintiff and raved at how well the shows had gone after apparently talking with his Production Supervisor, Egan Elledge, and that he was proud of the work we had done. After further congratulations, defendant recounted his plans to quickly move the shooting schedule along. This attitude on the part of the defendant remained constant through the rest of August, and most of September. On September 29th, 2005, the defendant informed the plaintiff that he was dissatisfied with the shows and that he felt that the plaintiff looked “scared” and looked like the plaintiff “didn’t know whether to **** or fart.” Defendant then offered plaintiff a producer’s position, which was never brought up again. Defendant than offered the plaintiff an acting coach to work with in Burbank California, to which the plaintiff agreed. However, much like the next shows, the acting coach was never scheduled. Further, defendant told the plaintiff to issue a press release about the show to the public and once issued failed to back up the facts of the press release making the plaintiff look less then truthful and forthright. This kind of difficulty has existed from the start of this contract when in the beginning the defendant told the plaintiff that members of his staff were not cooperating in developing the show because they thought Simpson was an undercover Federal Agent sent to investigate the defendant. Defendant has a history of involvement with the Federal authorities. On September 29, 2005, almost two months after the taping of the first shows, plaintiff sent an e-mail to Egan Elledge asking for help in understanding what the defendant was doing and why. Elledge answered, “You know there (is) no help. To answer would only blind you further. Trust me its better to just go with the flow.” (Exhibit B) The plaintiff still does not know what this answer means. As can be seen by the attached e-mail from defendant’s personal secretary Susan; even she held the opinion that the defendant “always seems to mess you around,” referring to the plaintiff. (Exhibit C) Among many e-mails concerning the show that the defendant received, were two e-mails from two of the guests on the first two shows. One of them was from Reverend Albert Pennybacker, a well-known protestant cleric and frequent guest on television news shows and talk shows. Rev. Pennybacker commended the defendant for having a show such as the “Bishop’s Roundtable,” and what a superior job he felt the plaintiff did on set with him. (Exhibit D) A second e-mail from Sean Kosofsky of the Michigan Triangle Foundation, also commented favorably on plaintiffs conduct of the interviews. The Triangle Foundation than offered to support the show in any way it could through its network of contacts. (Exhibit E). Even people who had just heard about the show wanted to buy DVD copies of the shows if they could not get it through television. Plaintiff urges the court to read all of the attached E-mail to gain a better understanding of the degree of obstructionism that defendant carried on against plaintiff. Upon hearing the new revised opinion of the defendant, the plaintiff had a producer from Lion Television in New York City review the shows and asked for his unbiased opinion. The result was that Lion found the shows to be good, and failed to notice any sense that the plaintiff was “scared” on film. In fact, plaintiff had previously been cast as a central key character in a weekly television show pilot for the Discovery Channel, entitled, “The Good Guys.” Specifically it was the opinion of senior Lion management that the plaintiff “was the glue that held the show together.” The plaintiff’s next attempt to settle matters with the defendant and continue with the show, took place while on a trip to Las Vegas, which occurred on November 7, 2005, whereby plaintiff was in Las Vegas for three nights. The defendant informed the plaintiff that he wished to fly to Las Vegas to meet with the plaintiff to discuss upcoming plans for the show. This meeting was to take place on the afternoon of November 9, 2005 at the Sahara Hotel in Las Vegas. Plaintiff telephoned the defendant as late as the morning of the 9th, at 8:19 A.M. according to telephone records and spoke with the defendant. Defendant assured plaintiff that he was flying in from Burbank CA., and would be at the hotel that afternoon as scheduled. Plaintiff spent the afternoon in the hotel waiting for the defendant who never appeared. Neither the defendant nor any of a multitude of young assistants that work for the defendant telephoned the plaintiff to inform him that the defendant was not coming to Las Vegas for the meeting. On or about November 23, 2005, plaintiff was requested by the defendant to fly to Burbank, CA for meetings with person (s) unknown regarding the show and to attend seminars of an unknown nature. After defendant told plaintiff to make travel arrangements and the arrangements were made according to the terms of the contract, i.e. first class air, the defendant once again breached the contract by insisting that the plaintiff ride in coach disregarding the bad back issues that required this travel to be completed by the plaintiff in first class. Plaintiff canceled the trip when defendant refused to honor the terms of the contract regarding travel, all giving rise to defendant’s breach of the contract, by failing to honor the terms and obligations of the contract.
6. On or about September 15, 2005, Plaintiff gave notice of breach of contract and demand for performance to the Defendant. Thereafter, Defendant: continued his course of conduct by ducking phone calls, not returning messages and further causing delays in the continuance of filming. The Defendant breached the above-described contract for reasons incompatible with good faith and fair dealing, as a proximate and foreseeable result of which the plaintiff suffered damages. The breach of contract was wholly unsupported by any arguable reasons, was willful, malicious, disrespectful and in bad faith showing complete disregard for the rights of the plaintiff. 7. Plaintiff has performed all conditions precedent to recovery and has not excused defendant’s non-performance or breach of the Contract. 8. Defendant’s continuing course of conduct from the very beginning of this contractual period and even from before, has caused the plaintiff emotional upset and distress. Plaintiff has invested a lot of time and effort into making this contract a success only to be sabotaged by the defendant.
VENUE The Court of Common Pleas of Luzerne County, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania has jurisdiction over this cause of action based on the following: 9. The Defendant does business in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania by providing broadcast material to cable networks throughout the Commonwealth. 10. The first two shows were taped in the Commonwealth. 11. The plaintiff resides in Luzerne County. 12. The plaintiff signed the contract in Luzerne County. 13. The contract states Commonwealth law applies.
CLAIMS COUNT I: 14. The Defendant’s breach of the Contract delineated herein above proximately caused Plaintiff to suffer a loss of $67,000 in income due the plaintiff in the first season alone. Further as a result of this breach, plaintiff was unable to have the opportunity to negotiate and produce the two, one-year extensions provided for in the contract worth at least $162,000.
COUNT II: 15. The conduct of Defendant complained of hereinabove constitutes: a breach of the above-described contract for reasons incompatible with good faith and fair dealing, as a proximate and foreseeable result of which the plaintiff suffered damages. The breach of contract was wholly unsupported by any arguable reasons, was willful, malicious, and in bad faith, for which the Defendant should be punished and deterred from similar conduct in the future. The conduct of the Defendant complained of here was intentional, egregious, willful, wanton and purposeful. COUNT III. 16. The defendant’s unlawful conduct as previously described in this complaint, was known to the defendant to be likely to cause emotional distress in the plaintiff. As a direct and proximate result of defendant’s unlawful conduct, the plaintiff has suffered emotional damage. The defendant’s conduct as previously described was outrageous, wholly without legal or factual justification, was malicious and wanton, and thus enable the plaintiff to recover actual and punitive damages as previously described.
DEMAND FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, the Plaintiffs pray for the following relief: 1. Trial by jury; 2. Judgment for Plaintiff and against the Defendant; 3. An award of damages in an amount which will fully and fairly compensate Plaintiff for breach of contract, breach of implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, and infliction of emotional distress adverse to plaintiff’s health; 4. An award of punitive damages in amount which is reasonably and rationally related to the egregiousness of Defendant’s conduct, and which is reasonably and rationally related to the financial net worth of the Defendant which is considerable, and which is in the public interest; 5. Reasonable attorney fees, costs and expenses; 6. Master copies of all three shows per contract; 7. Such other and further relief as may be deemed just and proper in the premises.
I hereby verify that the facts contained in this complaint are true upon the personal knowledge and belief of the plaintiff and are hereby submitted to the court in good faith under penalty of perjury. Respectfully submitted to the Court this 5th day of December 2005.
_____________________________________ Most Reverend Bruce J. Simpson, President for Benedictine Enterprises, LLC, Pro Se 216 Division St. Hanover Township, PA 18706 (570) 824-5451
I certify that a copy of this Complaint was sent via certified mail, return receipt requested, this 5th day of December 2005, to the registered agent for the defendant at the address contained in paragraph 2 of the complaint.
______________________________________ Most Reverend Bruce J. Simpson, President for Benedictine Enterprises, LLC, Pro Se 216 Division St. Hanover Township, PA 18706
-------------------- Buy the silence-Sell the noise SFTV.004-.0075 AVNT.0018-.0033 FPPL.0034-.03 WEGI. My new Call Posts: 3100 | From: Louisiana | Registered: Apr 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
ah for Eff's sake what is it , open season on Q?
-------------------- I don't play well with others, and have a problem with authority. I love to see the big guy fall to the under-dog. Posts: 192 | From: New Jersey - Armpit of the World | Registered: Jul 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
good...frank is cheap to pay for airfare...thats the attitude im looking for..he can be a reverend a rabbi or the pope... sit with the coach class...i bet you guys that frank rides first class..all these lawsuits are petty petty petty..
Posts: 414 | From: los angeles | Registered: Aug 2005
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by davidjanas: ok..so i guess the last time i was at the studios and frank was with his lawyers..this is why.. like he said...when we see the audit theres gonna be some things that we dont like ,and lawsuits are some of them. all these names hes using is under tmm...and thats what we have the stock for. its almost like were set on a decoy of qtn when really we need to know all about tmm. frank obviously laundered money from prior businesses to fund this project...the question is,,,,while he ripped off a bunch of people,how much money is the real debt in total ? i feel we definately need to know these things .now i fully understand why the price is at .0002 . theres no real figures to look at.and the market knows best how to play with our money. so if we dont come clean quick before feb. 2006 ,,,then frank is gonna lose this whole thing...the good news is....frank lawyer is gary goldman..*************..lol. lawsuits are nothing..there just a waste of time to try and get some money. who cares if frank owes 15 million dollars if the real value for qtn is 200 million... im gonna tell all my qbidians straight up.. frank told me he thinks its gonna go to .0050 to .0075 . at this point ,ill be happy with seeing .0015 ... but i wouldnt mind anything higher if it goes to 1 penny i make 400 k... ill send everyone on this board a bottle of cristall.. if and only if this actually goes through.. we will be very fortunate..whether its with our patience and pride...or our moet and strawberries in our mouth.
When we see the audit... Frank told you... He thinks....
We 'll see a DVD.. We were gonna see the audit been released before 21 nov... wich have been delayed several of times before... You showing up with rumors, talking to Frank, etc...
The rest you can add yourself
-------------------- I'm a genius and if u can't handle that, to bad !!!! Posts: 211 | Registered: Aug 2005
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by imakmony2005: WELL THEY GOT THE LETTERS ONLY SIGNED FOR TWO AND FRANK DID NOT SIGN, NOW WHAT? FOT
LMAO!!this is turning into a gigantic series of Young and the Restless...i bet ya Frank didnt sign because he was in New York when the papers were mailed.
Good work BTW
-------------------- Buy the silence-Sell the noise SFTV.004-.0075 AVNT.0018-.0033 FPPL.0034-.03 WEGI. My new Call Posts: 3100 | From: Louisiana | Registered: Apr 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
Tellthem when your coming and bring one of those little cameras. Or ask if you can use the copier. Tell them you brought your own copy paper, that way Frank won't hold it against you for being a share holder that would like to make some money. Hardy har har har.
quote:Originally posted by imakmony2005: WELL THEY GOT THE LETTERS ONLY SIGNED FOR TWO AND FRANK DID NOT SIGN, NOW WHAT? FOT
Posts: 4245 | From: SMALLVILLE USA | Registered: May 2004
| IP: Logged |
Topic Closed
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
Printer-friendly view of this topic
![[Smile]](smile.gif)
if it goes to 1 penny i make 400 k... ill send everyone on this board a bottle of cristall.. if and only if this actually goes through.. we will be very fortunate..whether its with our patience and pride...or our moet and strawberries in our mouth.
![[Big Grin]](biggrin.gif)
![[Wink]](wink.gif)
