This is topic QBID XXXIII "Q" The Global Frontier in forum Micro Penny Stocks, Penny Stocks $0.10 & Under at Allstocks.com's Bulletin Board.


To visit this topic, use this URL:
http://www.allstocks.com/stockmessageboard/ubb/ultimatebb.php/ubb/get_topic/f/8/t/017439.html

Posted by Maestro232 on :
 
We have now gone global...

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
For Immediate Release:


Q TELEVISION NETWORK STRIKES FIRST INTERNATIONAL DISTRIBUTION DEAL - AUSTRALIA'S
SELECTV

Digital 24/7 GLBT Channel to be Available throughout Australia and New Zealand

BURBANK, CA - November 22, 2005 - Q Television Network (See OTCBB Other: QBID)
today announced that it has entered into an affiliate agreement with Selectv,
which will become the exclusive satellite provider of QTN programming throughout
Australia and New Zealand. As a result of this agreement, the network's
groundbreaking GLBT programming will be available to roughly 10 million
potential additional households.

QTN recently launched with Cox Communications Eureka/Arcata and Time Warner
Cable of New York and New Jersey, which added nearly one million digital
households to its distribution. Selectv marks the network's first international
distribution deal and a substantial expansion of its consumer reach. QTN began
firming up Selectv launch details during the recent MIPCOM, where executives
pitched the network's growing signature lineup of original GLBT shows.

"This is an incredibly exciting move for us," said Carol Hinnant, QTN's Vice
President, Affiliate Sales & Marketing. "Selectv has embarked on a mission to
deliver Australian residents a rich and diverse lineup of international
television fare. Our programming will fill a definite void in Australia, where
the GLBT audience is just as vocal and involved as it is in the States."

Q Television currently offers its customers five hours of live programming
daily, including such hit series as "Brunch," "QueerEdge with Jack E. Jett,"
"The Reichen Show," "On Q Live," "Q on the Move," "QTN World News,"
"Xcess/Access," "On Topic" and "Flesh and Threads." QTN is also the official
television network for Gay Games VII, for which the network reserves the right
to package and distribute for sale to other providers as a pay-per-view event.

About Q Television:
This 24/7 premium television network is organized to create, develop and feature
television programming for the gay and lesbian community, including live &
interactive content every weeknight, plus sports, information and entertainment.
While the company expects much of its subscriber base to be comprised of members
of the gay and lesbian population, management also believes that quality
programming about the gay and lesbian experience, designed to entertain, educate
and inform, will attract many other segments of the viewing public. The
company's programming is available on a subscription basis to those desiring to
subscribe. The network is telecast 24 hours per day, 7 days per week. Providing
distribution via satellite ensures availability of the network across the United
States, including Alaska, Hawaii and Puerto Rico. Q Television Network is the
official network of Gay Games® VII. The network is also ad-supported. For
further information on programming and subscriptions, please visit
www.qtelevision.com.

Safe Harbor Statement
As a cautionary note to investors, certain matters discussed in this press
release may be forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such matters involve risks and
uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ materially, including the
following: changes in economic conditions; general competitive factors; the
television network's ability to execute its business model and strategic plans;
and the risks described from time to time in the company's Securities and
Exchange Commission filings.

# # #

Contact:

QTN Media Relations
Priority Public Relations
Kristien Brada-Thompson
(818) 338-3555
kristien*prioritypr.net

Investor Relations
Equity Relations, Inc.
Richard Brown (617) 314-7379
Staff*EquityRelations.com
 
Posted by sneither on :
 
Houston,, we have 'lift off'....
 
Posted by Maestro232 on :
 
wahoo!
 
Posted by 4Tune4Me on :
 
SHOW ME THE MONEY!
 
Posted by Sam1959 on :
 
Shouldn't the new thread name include the number XXXIV ?
 
Posted by pennnies on :
 
Watch for downtick on dilution.

[Roll Eyes]
 
Posted by Maestro232 on :
 
On the bright side...we didn't actually drop in price [Smile]
 
Posted by Maestro232 on :
 
Probably Sam...but I've never made a new threaad before. I didn't realize.
 
Posted by noah129 on :
 
nice maestro ! good luck to all longs this is real news and im feeling a sense of renewal of my faith that frank is not totally scamming us he is building a huge glbt network and im in on the ground floor of it.the potential is huge in this one we need buybacks and continued steady growth that will be it.the programming is already slammin good its time to get the share structure in order so that big time investors can take us seriously.
 
Posted by noah129 on :
 
no big trades going through right now but anyone notice that we are only trading at .0005 i hope i dont jinx us but it seems as though the market makers are taking this news seriously for the moment being.i know i am.
 
Posted by Sam1959 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Maestro232:
Probably Sam...but I've never made a new threaad before. I didn't realize.

No biggie. It was a good time to start a new thread--thanks for being proactive and taking care of it.
 
Posted by Maestro232 on :
 
My dream is that this thread doesn't make it past 25 pages. Oh yes, you know what I'm getting at. I want the audit to come out before we hit page 25. Because, of course, we will make a new thread for that.
 
Posted by noah129 on :
 
anyone have the level 2's? im currious to see the line up how many are bidding vs. asking now?
 
Posted by Dew-it on :
 
Ok, this PR has some teeth in it and it confirms that QTN is international now "...which will become the exclusive satellite provider of QTN programming throughout Australia and New Zealand." We finally get a satellite provider, I like it! [Big Grin] Next is Dishnetwork in the US-hopefully. However, Frankie boy, I AM still waiting for the DAMN results!
 
Posted by King Crimson on :
 
Maestro232--

think the only way to fix is to close and lock XXXIII, and open a new XXXIV...
 
Posted by Maestro232 on :
 
Well...I certainly am willing to do that if I get a second and a third on that.
 
Posted by Dew-it on :
 
Good PR, but IMO will not budge the PPS. We still NEED auidt results.

vol 378M
10X.0004
9X.0005
 
Posted by King Crimson on :
 
might as well do it now before too many posts....
 
Posted by DIGDOUGH on :
 
Go for it XXXIV
 
Posted by Maestro232 on :
 
I can't because I'm not an administrator I guess. Sorry.
 
Posted by qlooz on :
 
wasnt there supposed to be some sort of dvd or cd released to investors?
 
Posted by Jonas Inv. on :
 
a new thread.. that means we 'll see new numbers... how much 'll be the O/S in this thread.. are we gonna see 0,0003... people still hoping to see the audit, and not to forget to mention the DVD, it must be finnished by now [Roll Eyes] . 'll Qbid be able to bild up some cash flow or are they gonna continue diluting or use the common stock to pay things... the story continues
 
Posted by King Crimson on :
 
btw...nice title

QBID XXXIV "Q" The Global Frontier
 
Posted by noah129 on :
 
still no trades at .0004 since the news i like this alot i just hope it holds up maybe tommorrow we get an uptick.perhaps a double pr today one after the bell would be sweet .at least we have something to chew on instead of all the bickering that was going on about banning this person or that person.
 
Posted by Ad astra on :
 
Could someone kindly let me know if we are seeing the massive 9M dumps today? If so, is this the first day we've not seen it? MillerTime, I believe you are the rain man on Level2's? [Smile] Your thoughts?
 
Posted by Jonas Inv. on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by qlooz:
wasnt there supposed to be some sort of dvd or cd released to investors?

yep... [Big Grin] .. and not to forget the audit. but you wont see the DVD (just my opinion)
 
Posted by Dew-it on :
 
not much dumping going on today... mostly buys.

quote:
Originally posted by Ad astra:
Could someone kindly let me know if we are seeing the massive 9M dumps today? If so, is this the first day we've not seen it? MillerTime, I believe you are the rain man on Level2's? [Smile] Your thoughts?


 
Posted by noah129 on :
 
almost a half hour with no trades at .0004 is this the beggining of a new trend folks lets just wait and see i havent been this excited about a stock trading at .0004 in a long while wish i could buy more no funds currently.
 
Posted by Dew-it on :
 
PR just hit Business Wire a few minute ago. It will be interesting to see if get an increase in buys or sells.
 
Posted by noah129 on :
 
this is gonna get interesting if we downtick i will be sorta shocked even though that was the previous pattern i just dont see it happening this time who would be selling right now?
 
Posted by Dew-it on :
 
vol 386.9M
10X.0004
9X.0005
 
Posted by noah129 on :
 
volume picking up is it possible for an uptick hehehehe.hey jen bottomliner what you guys think of this are you in shock or just lurking hehe.
 
Posted by crockett on :
 
You guys can thank me for the news.. I finally sold mine and a hour or so later this comes out. [Roll Eyes]

This is good news, but I really wonder if it will make this stock go anywhere. I think most people are waiting on the audit and to find out what is going on with those 10 billion shares..
 
Posted by SingleDad703 on :
 
The Aussie SAT company is going to be like the first domino in a string of events.
 
Posted by DontPass on :
 
doesnt "perceived" positive news usually have a positive effect on stocks?

if you cant see that this stock is a complete scam you deserve to lose your money.

frank is a crook.
 
Posted by Jennifercd10 on :
 
There is a big difference between "is" and "perceived". It’s an realist / pessimist thing.
 
Posted by DIGDOUGH on :
 
If this was any other worthless penny stock it would go up a couple of cents.
I'm holding, but i'd really like to see a different scenario for a change.
 
Posted by MillerTIME on :
 
WEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
WEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
WEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
 
Posted by DontPass on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Jennifercd10:
There is a big difference between "is" and "perceived". It’s an realist / pessimist thing.

Ok if it "is" then why isnt the stock moving. I hate scams and this is one.
 
Posted by DontPass on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by DIGDOUGH:
If this was any other worthless penny stock it would go up a couple of cents.
I'm holding, but i'd really like to see a different scenario for a change.

so you are saying that most other penny stocks are worthless and this one isnt??

frank is a crook.
 
Posted by MillerTIME on :
 
I just got back home!!!!!

LMAO!!!ahhahahaah

this is BY FAR- THE BEST and i mean THE BEST news we have ever seen..

Are you kidding me!!!

all across australia and new zealand!!ahahhaha, i cant stop laughing this is sooooooo good!!!

10 million more potiential subs!!ahahah

holy cow, we were excited with eurkea, and its measely 25K, now were talking about 10M potiential subs!!!

WOW, QTN is going to be BIG
 
Posted by Jus Do Um on :
 
Dontpass I suppose we should all take your advice,

You must be right about the Q being a "scam"

Those guys at Time Warner, RCN, Cox, PlanetOut, and SelecTV must be idiots too. (HELLO)
 
Posted by GoodFella on :
 
Hi everybody.

I cannot feel positive about this stock anymore. I am not gonna sell because at this point the value of my stocks doesn't represent anything... but I've truely lost my hopes, plus all the time I spent on this stock makes me sad.

We have had 4 giant PR's in the past 2 weeks and I'm very happy for the company, they are going to the right direction. But the PPS hasn't been moving anywhere.

I wonder if the audit will even give us 1 uptick.

I just needed to get this out of my chest.

Thanks

GF
 
Posted by DIGDOUGH on :
 
I'm saying that they are worthless when they don't have productivity. They're quick to go down when they['re idle. But knews lkie Q puts out frequently should send the price up and never does.
I like the kind of CEO who wants his stock to have some value when possible.

quote:
Originally posted by DontPass:
quote:
Originally posted by DIGDOUGH:
If this was any other worthless penny stock it would go up a couple of cents.
I'm holding, but i'd really like to see a different scenario for a change.

so you are saying that most other penny stocks are worthless and this one isnt??

frank is a crook.


 
Posted by bige2533 on :
 
Too long of a post to cut and paste but here is a link about SelecTV.

http://www.selectv.com/about.html
 
Posted by Ad astra on :
 
DontPass
Member


Member Rated:
posted November 22, 2005 14:21
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
doesnt "perceived" positive news usually have a positive effect on stocks?

if you cant see that this stock is a complete scam you deserve to lose your money.

frank is a crook.
-----------------------------------

Ah Perception...sometimes it's half-full, sometimes it's half-empty.

I'll take my chances.
 
Posted by Dew-it on :
 
I think this is good news - but I agree with you. I ALSO would prefer the audit results!!!

quote:
Originally posted by madmoney:
F*CK THE NEWS!! WHERES THE FRIGGIN AUDIT!!!


 
Posted by Jennifercd10 on :
 
If Q is a “scam” then Frank and a lot of people have invested a huge amount of effort building a incredible television network so he can take your money and flush a success story. I find it interesting that there are a few short sighted people who think the rest of life is stupid. Also, one should be cautious when speaking in absolutes.
 
Posted by Ad astra on :
 
Dew-Thanks for the L2 info.
 
Posted by madmoney on :
 
R/S R/S R/S R/S R/S R/S these are six things frank can and WILL do to raise the PPS!. you know what! I dont give a F*ck any more! I have TOTALLY written this off! it`s DEAD! unless a miracle happens! and the audit will NOT be it!!
 
Posted by Jennifercd10 on :
 
Lets do pass on OLD news
 
Posted by Ad astra on :
 
"Queer stock for the straight guy"


LOL.

I'm out. Happy Turkey Day all.
 
Posted by Sam1959 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by DontPass:
quote:
Originally posted by Jennifercd10:
There is a big difference between "is" and "perceived". It’s an realist / pessimist thing.

Ok if it "is" then why isnt the stock moving. I hate scams and this is one.
I don’t usually engage people like you, but I can’t resist this one.

What do you think is a scam here? Are they making up these news releases about their new agreements with Cox, TW, Planet Out and now Selectv in Australia and New Zealand? Are the video clips we are seeing on the Planet Out site only there to give us the illusion that they are actually developing their own exceptionally good content and selling it?

Sometimes it amazes me how people can continue to try to save us from this stock even when everything but the PPS is telling us this rocket is on the launch pad and the rumbling noise is getting louder and louder. If you don’t want to get on board, that’s up to you, but I don’t need you to save me from this stock.

Note: Please don’t make your buy or sell decisions based on anything I have said—do your own research and come to your own conclusion.
 
Posted by sidhartha on :
 
So much news, this thing is exploding. To me, the writing is on the wall, it's just a matter of time, we're all going to be rewarded. Methinks those that are crying the loudest right now about no audit or pps movement are daytraders who are foaming at the bit to play this when it starts moving, which I don't fault them for. I'll maintain a core position and play it myself when it moves.
 
Posted by madmoney on :
 
I AM SO SICK OF THIS BULLSH*T!!!. I HAVE HELD AND HELD. I HAVE GIVEN FRANK THE BENNIFIT OF THE DOUBT, I HAVE WAITED AND WAITED BUTS IT`S ALWAYS NEXT WEEK OR NEXT MONTH OR NEXT YEAR!!!. WHILE I HAVE WAITED WEEKS,MONTHS,AND YEARS!! FOR WHAT? CHECK THE A/S PROBABLY 100 BILLION BY NOW!! YOU KNOW WHY THEY HAVE NOT RELEASED THE AUDIT? THEY ARE COUNTING THE O/S BY HAND!! IT WILL TAKE YEARS TO COUNT ALL THOSE BILLIONS OF SHARES!! LOL!!
 
Posted by Dew-it on :
 
[Wink]
quote:
Originally posted by Ad astra:
Dew-Thanks for the L2 info.


 
Posted by MillerTIME on :
 
still getting information on what this PR acutally means...it may just be POD in australia...so this could be the reason for the low volume on the news...

anyone else got any DD on selectv?
 
Posted by milliam on :
 
Booyah Jim!!! [Smile]

Glad I got another couple million at .0004 yesterday...well, at least I think I'm glad.

To the moon Alice!
 
Posted by sidhartha on :
 
Posted by: robertmic71
In reply to: None Date:11/22/2005 3:05:06 PM
Post #of 189644

Looks similar to dish/directv

http://www.kristal.com.au/product.asp?id=171
 
Posted by Jus Do Um on :
 
selectv
Street Address Level 7, 100 Collins Street
City Melbourne
Country Australia
Postal/Zip Code VIC 3000
Telephone +61 (0)3 9662 3333
Telefax +61 (0)3 9662 4518
Email information*selectv.com
information*i-view.com.au
Home Page http://www.selectv.com
 
Posted by Penny-Trader on :
 
wow so much for all my calculations this morning.

now there is more potential that i didnt count on.


man im sick of all this good news.

today we have 15 million more homes that can see part or all that we have to offer.

thats 17 million in total.

this morning we only had 2 million that we know of.


god what could tomorrow bring.


its going to be a very gay christmas this year


Frank is doing what he said he would do and much much more.

yup im holdin

Way to go Q is on the Move.

new movie coming out

Qocodile Dundee

Shrimp on the Q

and now
we are in
Qew Zealand

WOOOO HOOOOOO
 
Posted by Jennifercd10 on :
 
SELECTV is a Direct-To-Home Satellite Broadcasting Service in Australia.


The service offers a subscription television package consisting of non-English and English language channels aimed at the ethnic communities in Australia.

SELECTV will offer the service to various Asian and European language groups.

There will also be English language packages consisting of a selection of targeted channels that will appeal to particular market segments.
 
Posted by Marty on :
 
http://www.ukbusinesspark.co.uk/selectva.htm

Looks like it's owned by Carlton Communications
http://www.itvplc.com/
 
Posted by a4realguy on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Jennifercd10:
SELECTV is a Direct-To-Home Satellite Broadcasting Service in Australia.


The service offers a subscription television package consisting of non-English and English language channels aimed at the ethnic communities in Australia.

SELECTV will offer the service to various Asian and European language groups.

There will also be English language packages consisting of a selection of targeted channels that will appeal to particular market segments.

Should be able to see what channel Q is slotted for..
 
Posted by Clyde_Crashcup on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by madmoney:
I AM SO SICK OF THIS BULLSH*T!!!. I HAVE HELD AND HELD. I HAVE GIVEN FRANK THE BENNIFIT OF THE DOUBT, I HAVE WAITED AND WAITED BUTS IT`S ALWAYS NEXT WEEK OR NEXT MONTH OR NEXT YEAR!!!. WHILE I HAVE WAITED WEEKS,MONTHS,AND YEARS!! FOR WHAT? CHECK THE A/S PROBABLY 100 BILLION BY NOW!! YOU KNOW WHY THEY HAVE NOT RELEASED THE AUDIT? THEY ARE COUNTING THE O/S BY HAND!! IT WILL TAKE YEARS TO COUNT ALL THOSE BILLIONS OF SHARES!! LOL!!

Maybe it's the hanging chads that are holding them up. Probably had to do a recount.
 
Posted by Marty on :
 
Australia — Population: 20,439,548

http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs*.nsf/94713ad445ff1425ca25682000192af2/1647509ef7e25faaca2568a900154b63?OpenDocument

New Zealand 4,109,837

http://www.stats.govt.nz/default.htm
 
Posted by Jus Do Um on :
 
Source: http://finance.news.com.au/story/0,10166,12657003-462,00.html

Pay-TV service to list
By Jane Schulze
March 26, 2005

AUSTRALIAN investors will get another chance to gain direct exposure to the fickle world of pay-TV when former Foxtel chief executive Jim Blomfield lists his new pay-TV service, Selectv, later this year.

Styled as a multi-language pay-TV service, the business has changed its name from i-view and registered Selectv as a business name and as an internet domain name.

The Australian understands Mr Blomfield, who was ousted from Foxtel in 2001, will release a prospectus in early June to raise up to $30 million, having already sourced some seed funding.

The Selectv service, which will offer between 35 and 40 non-English speaking channels, will launch in May, just before the prospectus is revealed.

It will be one of the few new avenues for direct investment in the pay-TV sector since the collapse of Australis Media, owner of the now-defunct Galaxy service, in 1997.

The only other direct exposure to the pay TV sector is regional operator Austar.

Foxtel is jointly owned by Telstra, Publishing & Broadcasting Ltd and News Corporation, owner of The Australian. Optus's pay-TV service is owned by
Singapore Telecommunications.

The Selectv service will also offer some English-speaking channels on separate pricing tiers, but the channels and the exact prices have yet to be revealed.

However, Selectv is expected to set monthly charges at the lower end of the pricing spectrum.

"If there were three or four Greek channels in a package you would not be paying more than $49 a month for it," one of the advisers close to the business said.

Unlike the larger Foxtel, Optus and Austar pay-TV operations, Selectv does not require a large investment in infrastructure as the signals will be uplinked to satellites from Hong Kong.

One of Selectv's major partners is exTV, the pay-TV arm of Hong Kong free-to-air broadcaster TVB. ExTV will send the signals to PanAmSat's PAS 8 satellite.

Selectv's main expenses will be its investment in standard set-top boxes and some marketing costs.

It expects to break even in four years after gaining about 40,000 subscribers.

It will also offer a unique do-it-yourself installation service for subscribers in isolated areas, but has also contracted installation companies for metropolitan subscribers.

Selectv will pitch itself directly at the market left by the demise of Mike Boulos's Television & Radio Broadcast Services.

Mr Boulos has since started another pay-TV group called United Broadcasting International, which has some of the same channels as his previous service.
 
Posted by a4realguy on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Jus Do Um:
Source: http://finance.news.com.au/story/0,10166,12657003-462,00.html

Pay-TV service to list
By Jane Schulze
March 26, 2005

AUSTRALIAN investors will get another chance to gain direct exposure to the fickle world of pay-TV when former Foxtel chief executive Jim Blomfield lists his new pay-TV service, Selectv, later this year.

Styled as a multi-language pay-TV service, the business has changed its name from i-view and registered Selectv as a business name and as an internet domain name.

The Australian understands Mr Blomfield, who was ousted from Foxtel in 2001, will release a prospectus in early June to raise up to $30 million, having already sourced some seed funding.

The Selectv service, which will offer between 35 and 40 non-English speaking channels, will launch in May, just before the prospectus is revealed.

It will be one of the few new avenues for direct investment in the pay-TV sector since the collapse of Australis Media, owner of the now-defunct Galaxy service, in 1997.

The only other direct exposure to the pay TV sector is regional operator Austar.

Foxtel is jointly owned by Telstra, Publishing & Broadcasting Ltd and News Corporation, owner of The Australian. Optus's pay-TV service is owned by
Singapore Telecommunications.

The Selectv service will also offer some English-speaking channels on separate pricing tiers, but the channels and the exact prices have yet to be revealed.

However, Selectv is expected to set monthly charges at the lower end of the pricing spectrum.

"If there were three or four Greek channels in a package you would not be paying more than $49 a month for it," one of the advisers close to the business said.

Unlike the larger Foxtel, Optus and Austar pay-TV operations, Selectv does not require a large investment in infrastructure as the signals will be uplinked to satellites from Hong Kong.

One of Selectv's major partners is exTV, the pay-TV arm of Hong Kong free-to-air broadcaster TVB. ExTV will send the signals to PanAmSat's PAS 8 satellite.

Selectv's main expenses will be its investment in standard set-top boxes and some marketing costs.

It expects to break even in four years after gaining about 40,000 subscribers.

It will also offer a unique do-it-yourself installation service for subscribers in isolated areas, but has also contracted installation companies for metropolitan subscribers.

Selectv will pitch itself directly at the market left by the demise of Mike Boulos's Television & Radio Broadcast Services.

Mr Boulos has since started another pay-TV group called United Broadcasting International, which has some of the same channels as his previous service.

Please.. can we stop posting old information..
 
Posted by Jennifercd10 on :
 
Maybe now we know another reason why Frank bought NTI
 
Posted by BJ on :
 
NTI is what ????
 
Posted by DIGDOUGH on :
 
Salact tivi as on anglesh ana naun anglesh tivi souvice.
Goodai mait
 
Posted by Sam1959 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Jus Do Um:
Selectv's main expenses will be its investment in standard set-top boxes and some marketing costs.

It expects to break even in four years after gaining about 40,000 subscribers.

This information is a little dated, but still tells us some important things that we would not otherwise know.
 
Posted by MillerTIME on :
 
i am still very confused about this news, but i dont think its as big as i first thought...
 
Posted by Jennifercd10 on :
 
Network Teleports, Inc.
A Satellite Telecommunications Corporation
Voice Video Data
3200 Chartres Street * New Orleans, Louisiana 70117 * (504) 942-9200 * Fax: (504) 942-9204

Frank bought this...
http://www.networkteleports.com/
 
Posted by DIGDOUGH on :
 
Ya Q will have to send a signal way across the pacific ocean. And apparently have the equipment to do it.
Where is everybody anyway. Can't reach anybody. Supposed to be receiving a DVD in the mail. Supposed to see the outcome of the meeting to get the pps back up. I'm in the dark here as usual, short term.
 
Posted by a4realguy on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by DIGDOUGH:
Ya Q will have to send a signal way across the pacific ocean. And apparently have the equipment to do it.
Where is everybody anyway. Can't reach anybody. Supposed to be receiving a DVD in the mail. Supposed to see the outcome of the meeting to get the pps back up. I'm in the dark here as usual, short term.

SSDD
 
Posted by Jus Do Um on :
 
Source: http://finance.news.com.au/story/0,10166,12657003-462,00.html

Pay-TV service to list
By Jane Schulze
March 26, 2005

AUSTRALIAN investors will get another chance to gain direct exposure to the fickle world of pay-TV when former Foxtel chief executive Jim Blomfield lists his new pay-TV service, Selectv, later this year.

Styled as a multi-language pay-TV service, the business has changed its name from i-view and registered Selectv as a business name and as an internet domain name.

The Australian understands Mr Blomfield, who was ousted from Foxtel in 2001, will release a prospectus in early June to raise up to $30 million, having already sourced some seed funding.

The Selectv service, which will offer between 35 and 40 non-English speaking channels, will launch in May, just before the prospectus is revealed.

It will be one of the few new avenues for direct investment in the pay-TV sector since the collapse of Australis Media, owner of the now-defunct Galaxy service, in 1997.

The only other direct exposure to the pay TV sector is regional operator Austar.

Foxtel is jointly owned by Telstra, Publishing & Broadcasting Ltd and News Corporation, owner of The Australian. Optus's pay-TV service is owned by
Singapore Telecommunications.

The Selectv service will also offer some English-speaking channels on separate pricing tiers, but the channels and the exact prices have yet to be revealed.

However, Selectv is expected to set monthly charges at the lower end of the pricing spectrum.

"If there were three or four Greek channels in a package you would not be paying more than $49 a month for it," one of the advisers close to the business said.

Unlike the larger Foxtel, Optus and Austar pay-TV operations, Selectv does not require a large investment in infrastructure as the signals will be uplinked to satellites from Hong Kong.

One of Selectv's major partners is exTV, the pay-TV arm of Hong Kong free-to-air broadcaster TVB. ExTV will send the signals to PanAmSat's PAS 8 satellite.

Selectv's main expenses will be its investment in standard set-top boxes and some marketing costs.

It expects to break even in four years after gaining about 40,000 subscribers.

It will also offer a unique do-it-yourself installation service for subscribers in isolated areas, but has also contracted installation companies for metropolitan subscribers.

Selectv will pitch itself directly at the market left by the demise of Mike Boulos's Television & Radio Broadcast Services.

Mr Boulos has since started another pay-TV group called United Broadcasting International, which has some of the same channels as his previous service.
 
Posted by jill1170 on :
 
For those of you who like maps...

Here is a link to a Google map of NTI's location:

http://maps.google.com/maps?oi=map&q=3200+Chartres+Street,+New+Orleans,+LA+70117

Zoom all of the way in, and flip between the 'Hybrid' and 'Katrina' image views.

Kind of neat to actually see all of the satellite equipment there.
 
Posted by DIGDOUGH on :
 
You'll have to bring me up to date on your code. I don't have SSDD in my abbreviation list.

quote:
Originally posted by a4realguy:
quote:
Originally posted by DIGDOUGH:
Ya Q will have to send a signal way across the pacific ocean. And apparently have the equipment to do it.
Where is everybody anyway. Can't reach anybody. Supposed to be receiving a DVD in the mail. Supposed to see the outcome of the meeting to get the pps back up. I'm in the dark here as usual, short term.

SSDD

 
Posted by Penny-Trader on :
 
NTI is the teleport company in louisiana that we bought for up linking our signal to satellites

it is all falling together nicely

Rod

quote:
Originally posted by BJ:
NTI is what ????


 
Posted by betting babe on :
 
Select TV is a new satellite pay tv service in Australia.
http://www.aus-city.com/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=27;t=000148;p=0

interesting read to get the locals' perspective.

~BB
 
Posted by a4realguy on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by DIGDOUGH:
You'll have to bring me up to date on your code. I don't have SSDD in my abbreviation list.

quote:
Originally posted by a4realguy:
quote:
Originally posted by DIGDOUGH:
Ya Q will have to send a signal way across the pacific ocean. And apparently have the equipment to do it.
Where is everybody anyway. Can't reach anybody. Supposed to be receiving a DVD in the mail. Supposed to see the outcome of the meeting to get the pps back up. I'm in the dark here as usual, short term.

SSDD

Basically SSDD = Same Ole Crap, different day
 
Posted by Jennifercd10 on :
 
Just think, we got the SelecTV news a day before they did!
 
Posted by MillerTIME on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by betting babe:
Select TV is a new satellite pay tv service in Australia.
http://www.aus-city.com/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=27;t=000148;p=0

interesting read to get the locals' perspective.

~BB

Betting Babe!!!!have you gotten to see QTN yet or have you got a chance to subscribe yet? its been a while since we have heard from ya
 
Posted by Clyde_Crashcup on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Jennifercd10:
Network Teleports, Inc.
A Satellite Telecommunications Corporation
Voice Video Data
3200 Chartres Street * New Orleans, Louisiana 70117 * (504) 942-9200 * Fax: (504) 942-9204

Frank bought this...
http://www.networkteleports.com/

Triangle Multi-Media Limited, Inc., (OTCBB Other: QBID), the parent company of Q Television Network, announced today the purchase of Network Teleports Inc.(NTI) of New Orleans. The purchase will be made with private financing of five million dollars, and will not dilute Triangle Multi Media stock, QBID. The purchase will include an ownership position by the private equity group, but controlling interest will be with Triangle Multi Media. (09/15/05)
 
Posted by DIGDOUGH on :
 
BB, you just got back from Australia. Recently anyway. I think you were still there the last time you posted.
Is there going to be anything on your webpage about your trip?
 
Posted by Jennifercd10 on :
 
6! Someone after my own heart!
 
Posted by BJ on :
 
6 is beter than .0004 or .0005 . Hope it a start to a steady clime
 
Posted by Penny-Trader on :
 
it has to start somewhere

Rod
 
Posted by juice on :
 
close at 6???
then millions dumped AH at .0004
ahaha frikin qbid
 
Posted by betting babe on :
 
hey MT. havent seen Qtv yet- is it broadcasting on Time Warner now? anyone know the channel?


hiya Dig. yup, recently back from Sydney. that was one looooong commute to work to shoot ONE photo.


im in miami beach til end of month, then i'll finally have time to update my website =)

i check in every now and then. i dont think frank is gonna deliver much of a christmas present, so i'm workin IES right now.

HAPPY THANKSGIVING EVERYBODY!!!!!!! [Wink]

~BB
 
Posted by sidhartha on :
 
TRIANGLE MULTI-MEDIA (QBID.PK) At 3:51PM ET: 0.0004 0.0001 (20.00%)
MORE ON QBID.PK

Last Trade: 0.0004
Trade Time: 3:51PM ET
Change: 0.0001 (20.00%)
Prev Close: 0.0005
Open: 0.0005
 
Posted by sidhartha on :
 
TRIANGLE MULTI-MEDIA (Other OTC:QBID.PK) Delayed quote data

Last Trade: 0.0006
Trade Time: 3:59PM ET
Change: 0.0001 (20.00%)
Prev Close: 0.0005
Open: 0.0005
 
Posted by noah129 on :
 
im showing a close at .0006 this could be the begining of a new trend folks.i bet ya alot of eyes have been simply waiting for this to move from the recent stuck points of .0004-.0005. once we get some volatility again the daytraders will be all over this trying to get those quick 20% trades all day long.my shares are still on lockdown i think its gonna be a good end of the year afterall. im targeting a end of year price of .0018 or much higher.i know this seems unrealistic to some but i think it is doable and i expect it to happen.i dont plan on dumping my shares but i would like to see some green for the close of the year.good luck to all lets hope for a pleasant surprise tommorrow maybe the audit something to talk about over thanxgiving with the family hehe.
 
Posted by Bottomliner on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by noah129:
volume picking up is it possible for an uptick hehehehe.hey jen bottomliner what you guys think of this are you in shock or just lurking hehe.

noah
I think it's very good news, but I am not shocked by any good news about QBID. When you "believe" in something, you sit back and relax and let it develop at its own pace.

I've been out-and-about most of the afternoon. I have all the shares I want, and I don't intend to sell any, so watching the market is just a way to pass time when I'm bored.

Now I'm just sitting here laughing at all the bashers as they try to explain what is "really happening" and asking the same questions they ask everyday:
1) Where's the audit"
2) Where's the DVD?
3) Where's Waldo?
4) Where's the beef? (You gotta be an old fart to understand that one. [Big Grin] )

If there were no bashers, I'd have to subscribe to the "Idiot Channel" to get my daily ration of humor. [Big Grin] [Big Grin]
 
Posted by CashCowMoo on :
 
yahoo finance is showing the close at .0006 as well. nice....

now look at this chart...


 -

RSI on the way up....nice white candlestick formed today at the last min. tomorrow would be the best day to release an audit after putting out last min news of international matters.

"The best comes to those who wait"

and for people thinking this is a scam..ive seen a lot of scams on the pennys, and i really dont think this is one. i mean seriously...are you people calling it a scam because you are frustrated with not getting what you want, a daytrader, or a basher?
 
Posted by CashCowMoo on :
 
P.S. looks like volume will begin picking up nicely as well
 
Posted by Bottomliner on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by madmoney:
I AM SO SICK OF THIS BULLSH*T!!!. I HAVE HELD AND HELD. I HAVE GIVEN FRANK THE BENNIFIT OF THE DOUBT, I HAVE WAITED AND WAITED BUTS IT`S ALWAYS NEXT WEEK OR NEXT MONTH OR NEXT YEAR!!!. WHILE I HAVE WAITED WEEKS,MONTHS,AND YEARS!! FOR WHAT? CHECK THE A/S PROBABLY 100 BILLION BY NOW!! YOU KNOW WHY THEY HAVE NOT RELEASED THE AUDIT? THEY ARE COUNTING THE O/S BY HAND!! IT WILL TAKE YEARS TO COUNT ALL THOSE BILLIONS OF SHARES!! LOL!!

CODE BLUE, CODE BLUE. This guy's ready for a massive coronary. [Eek!]
 
Posted by Rich735 on :
 
Close at 6 on Etrade too. Hey AWESOME news today guys. I love reading how excited you all get through the day about our investment. I am a factory worker with no internet connection all day. But when I get home I enjoy seeing how you all react to the days events!

The news looks promising and I believe everything is coming together nice and fast.

I wish Frank would release the audit to send this thing sky high!

Don't forget all the positive emails we have gotten from Dish! I think that news will be soon!!BOOM!!!!!!!

Rich
 
Posted by Penny-Trader on :
 
im starting to feel like buying again

maybe a good time to start.

Frank really delivered a load of good news today.


ill bet there is a party somewhere tonight i Q land.

Rod
 
Posted by CashCowMoo on :
 
remember...CMKX went to .0012 PPS with 500BIL O/S....with no known valuation! anything is possible in this market so its not all doom and gloom
 
Posted by noah129 on :
 
im feeling good about this that is for sure it has been a long ride down but remember penny stocks can correct themselves very quickly at times.imagine if noone is willing to sell this thing could double in a day or more.good luck to you all i would not be surprised to see a downtick in the morning as that would be a way for market makers to get more weak hands to dump and run but i truly beleive we are at the begining of a very interesting time to be a qbid shareholder.

20 million long and strong

sincerely your qbidiot.
 
Posted by Dew-it on :
 
Lets not get excited about the ONE trade at .0006. There is still no trend change [Frown] . The ASK never budged from .0005 - all 9 MMs were still lined up at .0005 on ASK. It is obvious that someone intentionlly put a buy in at to .0006. below is the actual buy that went through for a whopping $300. at

15:59:48 500000 0.0006 + OTCEQ_NBB

After that over over a 100+ Mil went through at .0004.

16:02:45 2000000 0.0004 - OTCEQ_NBB T (F)
16:02:45 831601 0.0004 - OTCEQ_NBB T (F)
16:02:45 3000000 0.0004 - OTCEQ_NBB T (F)
16:02:45 1825000 0.0004 - OTCEQ_NBB T (F)
16:02:45 500000 0.0004 - OTCEQ_NBB T (F)
16:02:45 9999999 0.0004 - OTCEQ_NBB T (F)
16:02:45 1500000 0.0004 - OTCEQ_NBB T (F)
16:02:45 2000000 0.0004 - OTCEQ_NBB T (F)
16:02:45 470000 0.0004 - OTCEQ_NBB T (F)
16:02:45 7000000 0.0004 - OTCEQ_NBB T (F)
16:02:45 1730000 0.0004 - OTCEQ_NBB T (F)
16:02:45 45000 0.0004 - OTCEQ_NBB T (F)
16:02:45 498399 0.0004 - OTCEQ_NBB T (F)
16:02:45 9999999 0.0004 - OTCEQ_NBB T (F)
16:02:45 7500002 0.0004 - OTCEQ_NBB T (F)
16:02:45 500000 0.0004 - OTCEQ_NBB T (F)
16:02:45 500000 0.0004 - OTCEQ_NBB T (F)
16:02:45 100000 0.0004 - OTCEQ_NBB T (F)
16:00:06 9999909 0.0004 - OTCEQ_NBB T (F)
16:00:06 100 0.0004 - OTCEQ_NBB T (F)
16:00:06 9999999 0.0004 - OTCEQ_NBB T (F)
16:00:06 9999999 0.0004 - OTCEQ_NBB T (F)
16:00:06 9999999 0.0004 - OTCEQ_NBB T (F)
16:00:06 9999999 0.0004 - OTCEQ_NBB T (F)
16:00:06 9999999 0.0004 - OTCEQ_NBB T (F)
16:00:06 9999999 0.0004 - OTCEQ_NBB T (F)
16:00:06 9999999 0.0004 - OTCEQ_NBB T (F)
16:00:06 9999999 0.0004 - OTCEQ_NBB T (F)
16:00:06 9999999 0.0004 - OTCEQ_NBB T (F)
15:59:48 500000 0.0006 + OTCEQ_NBB
15:56:12 1000000 0.0005 + OTCEQ_NBB
15:55:03 200000 0.0005 + OTCEQ_NBB
15:53:39 5000000 0.0004 - OTCEQ_NBB
15:53:00 500000 0.0005 + OTCEQ_NBB
 
Posted by buckwheatbob on :
 
To be honest with you, we can do with out the numbers. Look at it as leaving the past behind us and moving forward.Good analigy? [Smile]

quote:
Originally posted by Maestro232:
Well...I certainly am willing to do that if I get a second and a third on that.


 
Posted by sneaker68 on :
 
SCAM?!? Yeah, right! With all the major companies QTN is involved with and all the expenses already paid out for CURRENT broadcasting, Frank better get in touch with Usama Bin Ladin concerning "How to go underground for the rest of your life" if this is a scam!
 
Posted by buckwheatbob on :
 
Look mom,another bird dropping. No matter how good the news, always one clown has to do a dance for us. Another idiot with another name. As JenCD said it best "Percieved" and that is only your oppinion. Scams do not add assets such as todays news and todays news would not add Q if it was a scam.

quote:
Originally posted by DontPass:
quote:
Originally posted by Jennifercd10:
There is a big difference between "is" and "perceived". It’s an realist / pessimist thing.

Ok if it "is" then why isnt the stock moving. I hate scams and this is one.

 
Posted by QBID'n on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by sneaker68:
SCAM?!? Yeah, right! With all the major companies QTN is involved with and all the expenses already paid out for CURRENT broadcasting, Frank better get in touch with Usama Bin Ladin concerning "How to go underground for the rest of your life" if this is a scam!

ahhahahahaha!
 
Posted by MillerTIME on :
 
Planetout news today was great, but we already knew about it...although it is good news that Planetout PR'd our formal relationship.

The 2nd PR was great because we are now international and broadcasting in austrialia and new zealand, although, it definately is no where near as big as i had first imagined. Q has a good way to write PR's up to get maximimum potiential.

The carrier they are on is a small obscure carrier that only has like 50,000 subs. So yes its great we are now international and hopefully this is the first to many, but this is not going to bring in much revenues and that is why we didnt move to much on the news.

It was great news, but after first thinking we were on a major carrier with 10M subs, i was a little let down.

Have a good night all, and just as dewit said, that .0006 trade was a MM painting the tape for some reason. Because of that the chart is now screaming run, but there were still 9MM on the ask, so it didnt mean anything besdies maybe it was a MM sign.
 
Posted by Dew-it on :
 
I will probably be labeled as a Basher for this comment... but that is OK. For the record I am not a BASHER or PUMPER, but I call like I see it.

IMO QBID/QTN IS NOT a scam; However, Frankie boy has deprived "us" of info and "we" have been decieved by some his "communications" in refernce to shareholders/investors- so is this considered a scam? I dunno - we all interpret it as we want.

scam definition:

[n] a fraudulent business scheme
[v] deprive of by deceit;


quote:
Originally posted by QBID'n:
quote:
Originally posted by sneaker68:
SCAM?!? Yeah, right! With all the major companies QTN is involved with and all the expenses already paid out for CURRENT broadcasting, Frank better get in touch with Usama Bin Ladin concerning "How to go underground for the rest of your life" if this is a scam!

ahhahahahaha!

 
Posted by Clyde_Crashcup on :
 
4) Where's the beef? (You gotta be an old fart to understand that one. )

Guess I'm an old fart.
 
Posted by Numa on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Clyde_Crashcup:
4) Where's the beef? (You gotta be an old fart to understand that one. )

Guess I'm an old fart.

Hopefully not as old as the person who originally said it!
 
Posted by Bottomliner on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by buckwheatbob:
To be honest with you, we can do with out the numbers. Look at it as leaving the past behind us and moving forward.Good analigy? [Smile]

quote:
Originally posted by Maestro232:
Well...I certainly am willing to do that if I get a second and a third on that.


buck
Good point ... I agree. We can dump the numbers when we make a new thread.
 
Posted by Bottomliner on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Numa:
quote:
Originally posted by Clyde_Crashcup:
4) Where's the beef? (You gotta be an old fart to understand that one. )

Guess I'm an old fart.

Hopefully not as old as the person who originally said it!
Numa
Are you referring to me ... or to Clara, the "mature" lady who made the line famous? [Big Grin]
 
Posted by HighSide on :
 
hey that lady is my daughter LOL
 
Posted by Bottomliner on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by HighSide:
hey that lady is my daughter LOL

High
Thank god, I've found someone my age to party with in Vegas. Let's meet for dinner ... about 4:00 p.m. so we can get the Early-bird Special, of course. [Big Grin]
 
Posted by Penny-Trader on :
 
me tooo lol

maybe that is why the kids look at me like I'm a lunatic when i say that lol

Rod

quote:
Originally posted by Clyde_Crashcup:
4) Where's the beef? (You gotta be an old fart to understand that one. )

Guess I'm an old fart.


 
Posted by mjm2005 on :
 
Ok, I don't what happened there...but apparently I did something and got banned? I don't know what it was though.
 
Posted by mjm2005 on :
 
Is inviting people to a new thread on another site off limits? Cause I read the user agreement and didn't see a mention of it.

And thank god they let me back on, I sent 10 emails to allstocks today asking what happened.
 
Posted by qlooz on :
 
This is just like playing slots when you are loosing.... you keep playing till you break even or bust.


______________________________________________________
 
Posted by mjm2005 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Clyde_Crashcup:
4) Where's the beef? (You gotta be an old fart to understand that one. )

Guess I'm an old fart.

Old Wendy's ad?
 
Posted by mjm2005 on :
 
Doc...WHAT IS GOING ON!

My profile was flat out blocked this morning/mid afternoon. I can finally post again!

But now, NOW, I can't change my profile.

Did someone get access to my account or something??? What the heck is going on? (I don't want to risk getting banned...but I honestly don't believe, scratch that, I KNOW I DIDNT DO ANYTHING WRONG)

MY ANGER WAS SO GREAT THIS AFTERNOON...because a small college hobby that I enjoy...for a little after hours relaxation and reading was almost taken away...

Did you do this Doc? Or was it Bob Frey?? And I can't even PM him or you about it...because apparently I'm not accepting PM's... I never selected that...to not accept PMs...

I'm still fuming, but I hope this gets fixed...
 
Posted by qlooz on :
 
____________________________________________________________-


mjm BRVO is my next pick
 
Posted by Bottomliner on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by mjm2005:
quote:
Originally posted by Clyde_Crashcup:
4) Where's the beef? (You gotta be an old fart to understand that one. )

Guess I'm an old fart.

Old Wendy's ad?
Yep. One of the most remembered ads ever.
 
Posted by mjm2005 on :
 
Bottom...did you see the above? What gives? I'm considering calling allstocks.

Ahhh...Did you recall my doing anything remotely wrong on this board? Other than the possible "attacks" on the tom character a while back. But that shouldn't warrant the action that was taken...
 
Posted by qlooz on :
 
______________________________________________________
i have question? how do we get ratings or rate someone else?

______________________________________________________
 
Posted by mjm2005 on :
 
Does "Bob Frey" run this board/take phone calls?
 
Posted by mjm2005 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by qlooz:
____________________________________________________________-


mjm BRVO is my next pick

What's BRVO?
 
Posted by airdoo on :
 
hey mjm i've been having the same exact problem for over a week now. doc sent some messages to bob frey about it. still no word or change in my account. i'm going to just try to be patient. after the patience runs out i'm going to retire this s/n and get a new one. i hope it doesn't come to that.
 
Posted by mjm2005 on :
 
Yeah, I don't know... I just really like GZFX...in addition to my small amount of QBID...I just see a huge potential in both companies...as long as they don't mess it up...
 
Posted by airdoo on :
 
i lost $17k in GZFX. but maybe they finally got their stuff in order. they were missing a lot of deadlines and were very unprofessional.
 
Posted by mjm2005 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by airdoo:
hey mjm i've been having the same exact problem for over a week now. doc sent some messages to bob frey about it. still no word or change in my account. i'm going to just try to be patient. after the patience runs out i'm going to retire this s/n and get a new one. i hope it doesn't come to that.

I tried the retirement option this morning...after 10 emails... I guess patience would have been a little bit better...But one of my father's friends...if he had been patient, would have been out of five years of salary. So I think I can take a bit of action in this case...cause it's not like I'm the senior VP of a international paper company or anything...it is only a message board...But I like to participate, rather than lurk, as some have decided to do.

I still don't understand what it was about though...and I did call five minutes ago, and the guy who answered somewhat laughed at me...I didn't appreciate that.

BUT, who is Bob Frey??
 
Posted by qlooz on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by mjm2005:
quote:
Originally posted by qlooz:
____________________________________________________________-


mjm BRVO is my next pick

What's BRVO?
Brovo foods nutrional healthy drinks now distributed by coca cola
 
Posted by mjm2005 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by qlooz:
quote:
Originally posted by mjm2005:
quote:
Originally posted by qlooz:
____________________________________________________________-


mjm BRVO is my next pick

What's BRVO?
Brovo foods nutrional healthy drinks now distributed by coca cola
Damn, that might be something to look into. GZFX is possibly the next netflix...but it offers games as well..so I don't know...Right now I'm just 815k in with QBID...small amount compared to others on this board...
 
Posted by BJ on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by qlooz:
______________________________________________________
i have question? how do we get ratings or rate someone else?

______________________________________________________

go to the profile of the person to give a rating
 
Posted by Bottomliner on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by mjm2005:
Bottom...did you see the above? What gives? I'm considering calling allstocks.

Ahhh...Did you recall my doing anything remotely wrong on this board? Other than the possible "attacks" on the tom character a while back. But that shouldn't warrant the action that was taken...

mjm
Just saw your post about being banned for awhile, and just checked back several pages to see if I could find out why. But at this point I don't know anything. I tried to PM you but apparently you cannot receive PMs right now.

Did someone from allstocks contact you about being banned? Did they explain why you were banned? PM me if you can.
 
Posted by qlooz on :
 
______________________________________________________________________________________


*************.com
QBID
TRIANGLE MULTI-MEDIA INC
Daily Commentary

Our system posted a BUY CONFIRMED today. The previous SELL recommendation that was confirmed was made on 09.28.2005 (55) days ago, when the stock price was 0.0010. Since then QBID has fallen -40.00% .
 
Posted by BJ on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by qlooz:
______________________________________________________________________________________


*************.com
QBID
TRIANGLE MULTI-MEDIA INC
Daily Commentary

Our system posted a BUY CONFIRMED today. The previous SELL recommendation that was confirmed was made on 09.28.2005 (55) days ago, when the stock price was 0.0010. Since then QBID has fallen -40.00% .


 
Posted by qlooz on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by qlooz:
______________________________________________________________________________________


*************.com
QBID
TRIANGLE MULTI-MEDIA INC
Daily Commentary

Our system posted a BUY CONFIRMED today. The previous SELL recommendation that was confirmed was made on 09.28.2005 (55) days ago, when the stock price was 0.0010. Since then QBID has fallen -40.00% .

American bulls dot
 
Posted by mjm2005 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Bottomliner:
quote:
Originally posted by mjm2005:
Bottom...did you see the above? What gives? I'm considering calling allstocks.

Ahhh...Did you recall my doing anything remotely wrong on this board? Other than the possible "attacks" on the tom character a while back. But that shouldn't warrant the action that was taken...

mjm
Just saw your post about being banned for awhile, and just checked back several pages to see if I could find out why. But at this point I don't know anything. I tried to PM you but apparently you cannot receive PMs right now.

Did someone from allstocks contact you about being banned? Did they explain why you were banned? PM me if you can.

OK, Bottom here's the deal...I was pulling one of my "nocturnal" shifts last night for no reason...and posted a few messages...

One was about a possible new board name...that one doesnt matter...one was a DirecTV reply...

And the last was one where I expressed disgust in the fact that people are getting so off topic on the QBID board. That one got deleted for whatever reason...I had asked people to PM me if they wanted to start a new private board IN ADDITION to this one...but it's no longer up.

So, is that not allowed? I didn't see anything wrong with that...

I hope Doc gets back to me, because I didn't appreciate the laughter on the phone five minutes ago. Even though he may think I'm a loser, I'm not the one working the phones at a website call center...I'm in college--an endless amount of free alcohol...This is my hobby...my little weeknight post 3am relaxation binge...and it got taken away from me...

WHO IS BOB FREY???
 
Posted by mjm2005 on :
 
same page...on american bulls---


Were you eager to go long? Well, without doubt, it was the right time to do so. The BUY signal was finally confirmed, and most probably you have called your broker and placed your long orders with no hesitation.

Don't worry if you have missed this buying opportunity. The market may now give you a second chance. You may still find good prices for buying in the next session.


Today a Long White Candlestick was formed. This shows that the prices advanced significantly from open to close during the day under strong buying pressure.

BUY
CONFIRMED
Conformance Rating

0.0006
+0.0001 +20.00%
Candlestick Analysis
Today’s Candlestick Patterns:

Long White Candlestick

LONG WHITE CANDLESTICK
Type: Reversal/Continuation
Relevance: Bullish
Prior Trend: N/A
Reliability: Low
Confirmation: Required
No. of Sticks: 1

Definition:

The Long White Candlestick is a signal indicating strong buying pressure.

Recognition Criteria:

1. The real body of the Long White Candlestick has a relatively longer length relative to other candlesticks on the chart.
2. The sizes of the upper and lower shadows are not important.
Explanation:

Long White Candlesticks show strong buying pressure. A longer white candlestick is indicative of the fact that the closing price is further above the opening price. The Long White Candlestick shows that the prices advanced significantly from open to close during the day under strong buying pressure and buyers were aggressive. The Long White Candlestick is generally a bullish pattern, however its position within the broader technical picture is also important. For example; Long White Candlesticks may show a potential turning point or they may show that prices have reached to a support level if they are seen after an extended decline. If a Long White Candlestick is seen after a long and significant rally, it can point out to excessive bullishness in the market that says that prices are at dangerously high levels.

Important Factors:

The Long White Candlestick is a single candlestick pattern and it is not reliable as such. It reflects only one day's trading. It may show continuation of a trend as well as a possible reversal. Adjacent candlesticks must be taken into consideration for a healthier decision regarding the status of the trend.


----------------------------------------
WHO IS BOB FREY??
 
Posted by firefly on :
 
Global,,Didn't I say that before. [Big Grin]
 
Posted by qlooz on :
 
[QUOTE]Originally posted by mjm2005:
[QB] same page...on american bulls---


------------------------------------------------------


very good site but dont know how reliable they have been wrong on many predictions but first time i saw buy confirmed for qbid
 
Posted by Clyde_Crashcup on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Numa:
quote:
Originally posted by Clyde_Crashcup:
4) Where's the beef? (You gotta be an old fart to understand that one. )

Guess I'm an old fart.

Hopefully not as old as the person who originally said it!
she's very dead.
 
Posted by Bottomliner on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by mjm2005:
Bottom here's the deal...I was pulling one of my "nocturnal" shifts last night for no reason...and posted a few messages...the last...got deleted for whatever reason...I had asked people to PM me if they wanted to start a new private board IN ADDITION to this one.

mjm
I remember that post and meant to PM you today to ask some questions because I didn't understand what you had in mind. Maybe someone thought you were trying to start a site that would compete with allstocks? I really don't know. But welcome back. [Smile]
 
Posted by Lost1Here on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Bottomliner:
quote:
Originally posted by mjm2005:
Bottom...did you see the above? What gives? I'm considering calling allstocks.

Ahhh...Did you recall my doing anything remotely wrong on this board? Other than the possible "attacks" on the tom character a while back. But that shouldn't warrant the action that was taken...

mjm
Just saw your post about being banned for awhile, and just checked back several pages to see if I could find out why. But at this point I don't know anything. I tried to PM you but apparently you cannot receive PMs right now.

Did someone from allstocks contact you about being banned? Did they explain why you were banned? PM me if you can.

I was banned also. A few people here know this already through PMs today.

There is no reason for my ban at all. The only possible reason is because I complained publicly about the people complaining about being banned. on a privately run board. In other words, their boards, their rules, they can ban who they want. So they banned me! LOL

Ironic huh?

And no I was never contacted or told why I was banned either. I just woke up this morning and was locked out after my one post last night.

Oh well, I am not going to lose any time over it. They want me banned for backing the user agreement and expressing my frustration that these threads degrade regularly due to stupid issues like this... so be it. All they did was create another day with people banned coming back and posting under other names. <shrug>

I dont plan on posting anymore under that sort of arrangement but obviously someone got trigger happy and banned a few of us due to complaints. Most likely complaints from people that are using second and third names already since the only people I would have pissed off last night are people that have been banned already and were here to complain about it.

Some of the more senior members (and more respected ones imo) on here referenced and agreed with the post that got me kicked. Which I find even funnier. So basically if you want to get someone banned just mass mail complaints in because obviously your track record and number of previous complaints against you have no impact on the decision.

Oh well, I will lurk and just read from here on out.

Good news with Q today and thats really all that matters!
 
Posted by freebird68nj on :
 
a litle assistance by anyone please.....Is anyone else having a problem loggin onto etrade? I log on, but the only info I get is a an old stock I was researching. No stock, no portfolios..nothing...grrr.
 
Posted by BJ on :
 
Free bird- I just loged off, i had no problems. Try erasing your cookies and temp internet files off your tools pull down then to your internet options. That should work

Later
 
Posted by QBID'n on :
 
David PM me.
 
Posted by firefly on :
 
http://www.lyngsat-logo.com/corp/s_2.html
http://www.lyngsat-address.com/ss/selectv.html
 
Posted by Penny-Trader on :
 
at the bottom of every page here is a link that says contact us. you can hit that and get a message to Doc and Bob.

hope that helps you out brother

Rod

quote:
Originally posted by mjm2005:
Doc...WHAT IS GOING ON!

My profile was flat out blocked this morning/mid afternoon. I can finally post again!

But now, NOW, I can't change my profile.

Did someone get access to my account or something??? What the heck is going on? (I don't want to risk getting banned...but I honestly don't believe, scratch that, I KNOW I DIDNT DO ANYTHING WRONG)

MY ANGER WAS SO GREAT THIS AFTERNOON...because a small college hobby that I enjoy...for a little after hours relaxation and reading was almost taken away...

Did you do this Doc? Or was it Bob Frey?? And I can't even PM him or you about it...because apparently I'm not accepting PM's... I never selected that...to not accept PMs...

I'm still fuming, but I hope this gets fixed...


 
Posted by firefly on :
 
Dang Rod,,Keep that cold weather up there. LOL

Drove 5 1/2 hours yesterday through the Southest drencher.

Congrats on you hunt.

Sam
 
Posted by firefly on :
 
I am loving this.
http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/051122/sftu033.html?.v=37
 
Posted by firefly on :
 
Geez guess everyone went to bed.
 
Posted by HossTrader on :
 
I am still here. And you are right, the cold sucks. It would be a little better if the wind would knock it off!!
Hey, at least the Falcons are playing on Turkey day this year! [Big Grin]
 
Posted by noah129 on :
 
tommorrow is a big day qbidians need to get some rest its been a dramatic year and we have lots more to come to this cinderella story so we need our beauty sleep hehe. good luck to you all .

sincerely your qbidiot.

i hope we all get to meet in vegas before too long im getting jumpy to play some hold em.
 
Posted by firefly on :
 
Got that right hoss. Too bad about last weekend [Frown]

Also drove back in the wind 5 1/2 after a 4 hour meeting. Grey Goose is warming me up. [Smile]
 
Posted by firefly on :
 
Go Birds (and Dawgs)
 
Posted by HossTrader on :
 
LOL Maybe that is my problem! I should try that.
Been working on a mocha so far, does that count?
 
Posted by firefly on :
 
spike it [Big Grin]
 
Posted by HossTrader on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by firefly:
Go Birds (and Dawgs)

ACK! NOOOOO! And here I thought we could be such good friends.

But in the name of Q I must embrace diversity and even accept UGA fans I guess [Big Grin]
 
Posted by firefly on :
 
Jackets stung themselves this year ouch.
Love Bama too. What can I say. Meet you at Joes will buy a coffee for you. hehe
 
Posted by HossTrader on :
 
My three year old has almost mastered the phrase "To Hell with Georgia" hehe
 
Posted by Penny-Trader on :
 
thanks dude.

and ill do what i can to keep the cold up here.

we get blamed for all the freak cold weather so we will do what we can to keep it here.

lol

rod

quote:
Originally posted by firefly:
Dang Rod,,Keep that cold weather up there. LOL

Drove 5 1/2 hours yesterday through the Southest drencher.

Congrats on you hunt.

Sam


 
Posted by firefly on :
 
Saturday. (like both,,born and bread in ga) [Smile]
 
Posted by HossTrader on :
 
At least after beating Miami we have a shot this weekend!
We need to do that some time so I can talk to someone else about QBID! Everyone around here is sick of hearing about it!

And uh, sorry everyone else for the OT posts!
 
Posted by firefly on :
 
Thanks Rod,,Work Harder LOL
 
Posted by QBID'n on :
 
Hey Sam....Grey Goose?
 
Posted by firefly on :
 
Not sorry for the OT posts. Holiday 10 days starts now. [Smile]
 
Posted by firefly on :
 
Yes qbid'n. Yummy
 
Posted by QBID'n on :
 
ahhahaha....okay
 
Posted by Penny-Trader on :
 
well enjoy. mine just ended. im coming off of 16 days off.

not sure i want to go back at the grind tomorrow.

bright and early at noon lol

Rod
 
Posted by QBID'n on :
 
Might need to pass that around before all this is over. [Big Grin]
 
Posted by betting babe on :
 
yip CC. thats what i was gonna say.
~BB

quote:
Originally posted by Clyde_Crashcup:
quote:
Originally posted by Numa:
quote:
Originally posted by Clyde_Crashcup:
4) Where's the beef? (You gotta be an old fart to understand that one. )

Guess I'm an old fart.

Hopefully not as old as the person who originally said it!
she's very dead.

 
Posted by mjm2005 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Bottomliner:
quote:
Originally posted by mjm2005:
Bottom here's the deal...I was pulling one of my "nocturnal" shifts last night for no reason...and posted a few messages...the last...got deleted for whatever reason...I had asked people to PM me if they wanted to start a new private board IN ADDITION to this one.

mjm
I remember that post and meant to PM you today to ask some questions because I didn't understand what you had in mind. Maybe someone thought you were trying to start a site that would compete with allstocks? I really don't know. But welcome back. [Smile]

Yes, well thank you...I was fuming
_________________________________________________
WHO IS BOB FREY????
 
Posted by firefly on :
 
fly me out on your G5 and will bring along a case.
booyaa [Smile]
 
Posted by QBID'n on :
 
Your first day back ought to fly by.
 
Posted by firefly on :
 
LOL, I would love it!!!!
 
Posted by QBID'n on :
 
hahaha okay G-5...More like F-150....just give me a few hours and I'll be there...we'll fill the bed to have plenty for Vegas. hahaha
 
Posted by firefly on :
 
LMAO. I guess we don't have to worry about landing gear problems.

With the Grey Goose we might have a worry about the landing problem.
 
Posted by Penny-Trader on :
 
MJM

Bob Frey is the owner of this board.

he runs this as a business, and he is the owner.

he tries his very best to be fair and unbiased in his decisions.

but if you mentioned starting a new site he will disable your account. he is running a business and he sees this as soliciting on his board and does not have to allow that.

by the sound of things he had a very busy night last night, and may have been in a zero tolerance mode. if you send him a decent respectable letter at the link below, im sure that he will help you out in getting your profile opened up again.

http://www.allstocks.com/links/html/contact.html

Rod
 
Posted by QBID'n on :
 
hahahahahaha
 
Posted by firefly on :
 
BOB FREY is the man.
Thanks Bob and have a Happy Thanksgiving.
Thank You!

Sam
 
Posted by Penny-Trader on :
 
im a f150 owner as well.

im on my second one.

i had a 2001 and now a 2005 super crew 4x4

quote:
Originally posted by QBID'n:
hahaha okay G-5...More like F-150....just give me a few hours and I'll be there...we'll fill the bed to have plenty for Vegas. hahaha


 
Posted by QBID'n on :
 
Goodnight all...4am comes early. [Big Grin]
 
Posted by Penny-Trader on :
 
he is the man


[Big Grin] [Big Grin] [Big Grin]
 
Posted by QBID'n on :
 
Hey Rod... I also had two. But then got hired on at Kentucky Truck Plant and now building F-250/F-350 so I now have a F-250.
 
Posted by firefly on :
 
QBID, Kentucky stock here. Stearns and Somerset from Daniel Boone days. really no joke.
 
Posted by Penny-Trader on :
 
nice

employee discounts.

I missed that sale this summer by one month.

I bought mine and they offered the discount the following month.

dammit lol i could have been driving a larriat for the same price as i paid.

oh well

Rod

quote:
Originally posted by QBID'n:
Hey Rod... I also had two. But then got hired on at Kentucky Truck Plant and now building F-250/F-350 so I now have a F-250.


 
Posted by QBID'n on :
 
Hey neighbor!!! hahaha ...small world huh?

Hey buddy we'll talk more tomorrow...gotta get to bed. Had another long hard day today. I'm whooped...these ole'bones don't move around like they used to. haha
 
Posted by firefly on :
 
Take care and be safe. Q
 
Posted by QBID'n on :
 
Rod the sale is coming back if not already back in your area. Check with your local dealership. GM sparked it off again 2 weeks ago and as always we have to follow suit.
 
Posted by whizknock on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by firefly:
Global,,Didn't I say that before. [Big Grin]

Yes! I used to write that Genuine Broadcasting "International" TV Networks do not trade for less than a dollar a share & you told me that should be changed to "Global"!

That was almost a year ago & it was due to a hint that something was happening in Austrailia. Imagine that. LOL!
 
Posted by Penny-Trader on :
 
i already bought lol im good now for a couple of years.

ill check with you though when i am ready to buy again.

i am a ford man. my last 4 new vehicles have been ford and i have owned 9 in total

Rod
 
Posted by firefly on :
 
Yeppers whiz. Le't see how this plays out. Definetly not for the faint of heart. I am stoke with the recognition especialy with Planet Out.
http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/051122/sftu033.html?.v=37
 
Posted by whizknock on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by firefly:
Yeppers whiz. Le't see how this plays out. Definetly not for the faint of heart. I am stoke with the recognition especialy with Planet Out.
http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/051122/sftu033.html?.v=37

I'm now back in a mode of considering adding a huge buy to my position. Just wish, badly wish Frank would publish that audit!
 
Posted by mjm2005 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Penny-Trader:
at the bottom of every page here is a link that says contact us. you can hit that and get a message to Doc and Bob.

hope that helps you out brother

Rod

quote:
Originally posted by mjm2005:
Doc...WHAT IS GOING ON!

My profile was flat out blocked this morning/mid afternoon. I can finally post again!

But now, NOW, I can't change my profile.

Did someone get access to my account or something??? What the heck is going on? (I don't want to risk getting banned...but I honestly don't believe, scratch that, I KNOW I DIDNT DO ANYTHING WRONG)

MY ANGER WAS SO GREAT THIS AFTERNOON...because a small college hobby that I enjoy...for a little after hours relaxation and reading was almost taken away...

Did you do this Doc? Or was it Bob Frey?? And I can't even PM him or you about it...because apparently I'm not accepting PM's... I never selected that...to not accept PMs...

I'm still fuming, but I hope this gets fixed...


Who are the people that run this board/site??

Bob and Doc?? The person who answered the phone didn't sound very happy...
 
Posted by firefly on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by whizknock:
quote:
Originally posted by firefly:
Yeppers whiz. Le't see how this plays out. Definetly not for the faint of heart. I am stoke with the recognition especialy with Planet Out.
http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/051122/sftu033.html?.v=37

I'm now back in a mode of considering adding a huge buy to my position. Just wish, badly wish Frank would publish that audit!
I know what you mean.
I haven't bought any in months.
 
Posted by Penny-Trader on :
 
Hey Whiz i was wondering where you where.

haven't heard from Doc either.

im happy about the pr about Australia, but im more interested in the planet out connection.

that is the big deal in my mind right now.

we are targeting 5 million Gay and Gay friendly contacts that are already paying for gay material. I see this as the largest target audience that we could ever get our message to.

this one is huge.

the Australia deal only has 50,000 subscribers is what i understand. there are 10 million people that could potentially buy the satellite dish but only 50,000 that actually have it.

now on the other side of the coin. Selectv could gain a lot of new subscribers if the word can be spread about this programming.

it will eventually pay off for us.

the Plantout deal though i think will give us a quicker response in that if only 10% of them wanted Q that would mean that 500,000 people would be looking to sign up. if they dont have it in their area, then the pressure on the carriers will be enormous, and should be sufficient to force the carrier to carry this channel.

the wick is lit and the barrel is in danger of exploding.

wooooo i can hear the bang now.

Rod

quote:
Originally posted by whizknock:
quote:
Originally posted by firefly:
Global,,Didn't I say that before. [Big Grin]

Yes! I used to write that Genuine Broadcasting "International" TV Networks do not trade for less than a dollar a share & you told me that should be changed to "Global"!

That was almost a year ago & it was due to a hint that something was happening in Austrailia. Imagine that. LOL!


 
Posted by Penny-Trader on :
 
not sure who was on the phone. it may have been Bob.

It definately was not Doc. Doc is a moderator of the under.10 forums.

Bob owns Allstocks.

Rod


quote:
Originally posted by mjm2005:
quote:
Originally posted by Penny-Trader:
at the bottom of every page here is a link that says contact us. you can hit that and get a message to Doc and Bob.

hope that helps you out brother

Rod

quote:
Originally posted by mjm2005:
Doc...WHAT IS GOING ON!

My profile was flat out blocked this morning/mid afternoon. I can finally post again!

But now, NOW, I can't change my profile.

Did someone get access to my account or something??? What the heck is going on? (I don't want to risk getting banned...but I honestly don't believe, scratch that, I KNOW I DIDNT DO ANYTHING WRONG)

MY ANGER WAS SO GREAT THIS AFTERNOON...because a small college hobby that I enjoy...for a little after hours relaxation and reading was almost taken away...

Did you do this Doc? Or was it Bob Frey?? And I can't even PM him or you about it...because apparently I'm not accepting PM's... I never selected that...to not accept PMs...

I'm still fuming, but I hope this gets fixed...


Who are the people that run this board/site??

Bob and Doc?? The person who answered the phone didn't sound very happy...


 
Posted by mjm2005 on :
 
Ok, well...I sent a barrage of emails to him this morning and called... I just sent these two...Hopefully this will help...hahaha, I can't believe he thought I was trying to steal business from him!!! I love allstocks...at least did...now, I'm kind of annoyed...but, if my account works fully again...then I'll be back in the positive allstocks mode...I mean, c'mon...I'm a college student...I don't have the time or patience to run a website like allstocks...
____________________________________________________
EMAIL 1
__________________________________________________
Well, since I finally got a response. Let me explain the situation—and I only have time to do this right now because I am frustrated and have nothing to do. Classes at Wake Forest are finished until after the holiday and my flight is in the morning. So besides chatting with the few (maybe 20 people) left here, playing FIFA 2006, and doing some work with stocks…I have nothing better to do. But I digress…

Let me first say that I love allstocks. Allstocks was part of the reason that sparked my interest in the stock market, trading, and investing. I decided, no matter how good of a stock that it may be, to buy some shares of QBID. You, as an investor (I am assuming, unless you are a CSR), might or might not agree with me in this play. However, I did purchase it, and I will stick with it.

So, back in the day, I was just a lurker on the QBID forum, and I decided to sign up in July of this year. I guess that makes me a fairly new member. But, I only have and will continue to post in the QBID forum because I own stock in that company and am interested in it. As you can see by my post history, I am telling the truth. I have read the user agreement and do my best to stick to it. However, it angers me when others come to the site and are in blatant violation of the agreement they accepted upon registration. Lies, false statements, personal attacks, and the rest were all on the rise. I personally was disgusted by a member who did nothing but state false claims or non factually based opinions with no basis.

Now, last night…actually this morning (330AM or so)…I’ve somewhat become nocturnal since Wake lives up to its nickname of “Work” Forest. But anyway, around that time, I was totally disgusted by the useless banter occurring in the thread. “The stock is bad” “The stock is good” “Frank is a horrible CEO” “I think this” “I think that” “Get out now” “This stock is a scam” yada yada yada… Another member MillerTIME, actually remarked that he thought there had been some news due to the large amount of posts…only to find a multitude of trivial conversations. Therefore, in my disgust, I let loose in a post. I proposed starting a closed thread…not a forum… I don’t have the time nor resources to waste my time in creating a website for a stock discussion. I merely was proposing a THREAD that would only be open to certain members. I have seen other members do this, and I thought that it would be a good idea. I wanted people to PM me, so that, if we were to set up a new thread (maybe using a weird name or have a moderator only accept posts from certain posters), we could keep it to a select group of people. What good is a stock discussion if tangents are tapped into every other post?

So, this morning, or afternoon…whatever it was…I woke up and saw that I couldn’t login to my account. So, then I thought that allstocks must be down. So I went to the thread list to find a new QBID thread and posts on the rise. I then realized that something must have been done to my account. This then caused a great amount of anger and fueled my want to email you…I suppose a good dozen times. This, you can see, displays my clear anger and distress (and large amount of free time).

I guess what I should have done. Is emailed you (allstocks) before I proposed anything like that. What did you think I was trying to do? Overthrow allstocks??? Hahahaha. By no means. It is only now that I feel the resent that is encompassed by all that is allstocks. I hope this clears things up… And I tried calling this afternoon, and the person I spoke with (who might even be you) laughed at me as he was hanging up. Is this an Ohio-esque thing to do?

So, in conclusion, I want my account restored the way it was. I would ask, but I believe that I did nothing wrong in this situation, as it clearly was not in violation of the user agreement.

Thanks,

Mike
__________________________________________________
EMAIL 2
__________________________________________________
Bob, I understand that you are running a business. I respect that. But, I’m not trying to take away from that. Please don’t take my account away from me. I’m not soliciting. If anything, I am a contributing member…who contributes greatly to your ad revenues…I am obsessed with the board. Right now, I despise it…unless my situation is corrected. Please, please, please fix it.

Thanks,

Mike
 
Posted by mjm2005 on :
 
EMAIL 3
__________________________________________________
C’mon Bob!!! Have some leniency! It is Thanksgiving. PLEASE!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I didn’t mean to make you feel threatened…I meant start a THREAD not a forum… A THREAD, Bob, A THREAD!!! It’s hard to think straight when you’re up at 330 in the morning.

Thanks,

Mike

PS…I’m going through a tough time right now…my Grandfather passed away in 2001 on Thanksgiving, and it would mean a lot to me if this was resolved.
 
Posted by BJ on :
 
Just a little FYI - Seems chicago is on track for GayGames.... there more to read on the Q web site under GayGames in case some of you havent seen it


Chicago Mayor Daley Heads
List of Gay Games Champions
Political leaders, athletes, artists and activists endorse Gay Games VII




Chicago Mayor Richard M. Daley, Styx co-founder Chuck Panozzo, and U.S. Women’s World Cup Champion soccer goalie Saskia Webber are just three of more than fifty “2006 Gay Games Champions” announced today by the Chicago organizers of Gay Games VII Sports and Cultural Festival. The 2006 Gay Games Champions are prominent individuals — gay or straight — who have agreed to lend their support to the Gay Games coming to Chicago 15-22 July 2006.

Mayor Daley will serve as Honorary Co - Chair of the 2006 Gay Games Champions program. Co-chairing the program with him are Chicago City Treasurer Judy Rice and openly gay Chicago Alderman Tom Tunney.
 
Posted by RNINALVNG on :
 
mjm...RELAX...the stronger you let your emotions take over...the more detriment you will do to your cause...CHILL...lol.

P.S. Lost my Dad 11 years ago this Thanksgiving...on the 24th...I understand...just relax...Bob will get this rectified.
 
Posted by firefly on :
 
Nice Map.
http://qtelevision.com/site/Home/SubscriptionInformation/tabid/96/Default.aspx
 
Posted by Jennifercd10 on :
 
LISTEN!!!!!
There really is a scam going on here!!!!
Just think of those hundred plus employees saps that THINK they have a job. They better cash their paycheck fast!
Then there is that false storefront they call a studio… probably some paint on plywood or cardboard. Maybe it’s just an old set they recycled from the old MGM lot.
The Teleport satellite pix were an old one with a new date overlay.
Then, the easiest of all, pulling the wool over the eyes of Time Warner, RCN, Cox, Bright House, SelecTV and more. Well that was just child’s play for a SCAMMER like Frank.
Hummm… Now that I think about it… Usually when people scream things like “scam” in order to save knowledgeable people from themselves it is done to distract and cause confusion. Humm… so, I guess, it just may be that those that are giving us this free service are really the scammers. Could I be right?
 
Posted by HighSide on :
 
thanks Jenn i am putting my sell order in right now and i thought it was legit my eyes have been woolofied
 
Posted by buckwheatbob on :
 
I don't know about the rest of you but i will be happy with 20 F and 3' of snow...........Die Hard Snowmobiler!

quote:
Originally posted by HossTrader:
I am still here. And you are right, the cold sucks. It would be a little better if the wind would knock it off!!
Hey, at least the Falcons are playing on Turkey day this year! [Big Grin]


 
Posted by HossTrader on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by buckwheatbob:
I don't know about the rest of you but i will be happy with 20 F and 3' of snow...........Die Hard Snowmobiler!

quote:
Originally posted by HossTrader:
I am still here. And you are right, the cold sucks. It would be a little better if the wind would knock it off!!
Hey, at least the Falcons are playing on Turkey day this year! [Big Grin]


I might be more of a fan if I had a snow mobile, or there was actually snow involved! Down here it just gets cold, wet and nasty!! (BTW, for us cold means 30's at night and 50's during the day)
 
Posted by HighSide on :
 
up here i dont even own a coat just got back from the store in shorts and a t shirt
 
Posted by buckwheatbob on :
 
HHHMMM.......we clasify that as muggy and over cast. With all the hustle and bustle in life, I like to go for a nice ride and listen to how loud the silence is. Those who understand that phyosophy can appreciate the scinario

quote:
Originally posted by HossTrader:
quote:
Originally posted by buckwheatbob:
I don't know about the rest of you but i will be happy with 20 F and 3' of snow...........Die Hard Snowmobiler!

quote:
Originally posted by HossTrader:
I am still here. And you are right, the cold sucks. It would be a little better if the wind would knock it off!!
Hey, at least the Falcons are playing on Turkey day this year! [Big Grin]


I might be more of a fan if I had a snow mobile, or there was actually snow involved! Down here it just gets cold, wet and nasty!! (BTW, for us cold means 30's at night and 50's during the day)

 
Posted by buckwheatbob on :
 
ROFLMAO! you made a mistake. If it is that warm then it's down here, because up here it is -5 and in shorts you can freeze your kahoonas off tonight.

quote:
Originally posted by HighSide:
up here i dont even own a coat just got back from the store in shorts and a t shirt


 
Posted by MillerTIME on :
 
QTN Worldnews planetout update...5th clip now, and it seems that planetout is going to keep up with the monday-friday clips, so basically everyday there will be a different 10-20 minute news clip.

This news clip was from monday and has scott withers as lead anchor and steve kmetko and chris jones with stories. scott withers - lead anchor...hmmmm?

Also, the main shows of QTN still have yet to be updated from the first shows they showed a week ago. I would like to see planetout update these shows much more regularly like they do on the News.

Great partnership nonethless and with the large audience of planetout, this should hopefully land more carriers

http://www.planetout.com/video/article.html?stream=1155&id=971&navpath=%2Fnews%2F
 
Posted by Penny-Trader on :
 
buckwheat you can have it lol

i prefer my summer sports

lol

i like snwmobiling but i will take the boating and diving any day lol

Rod
 
Posted by HighSide on :
 
that does sound nice for that kind of enjoyment i got to drive 4 hours but it is so worth it,
ill be making that drive saturday morning
 
Posted by MillerTIME on :
 
Hey all you canadians, im headin up there soon for a christmas holiday. I will be staying up at our lake house up in haliburton so it better be cold enough for the lake to be frozen to play a little hockey and of course, get that snow up to at least 2 feet!

Anybody wants to come over, we normally bring a pump up and flood a rink size space on our lake and turn it into a big hockey game. Ya gotta love haliburton!
 
Posted by imakmony2005 on :
 
Well first off thank you BOB. #2 Hope we can get some of the old posters back maybe not here but on the board most are real p.o.ed but you never know they might come back. QBID is a slow boat to china yes we might get there its just when 5 years ten who knows.
 
Posted by firefly on :
 
How are the seals imak. Good to see you.
 
Posted by mjm2005 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by RNINALVNG:
mjm...RELAX...the stronger you let your emotions take over...the more detriment you will do to your cause...CHILL...lol.

P.S. Lost my Dad 11 years ago this Thanksgiving...on the 24th...I understand...just relax...Bob will get this rectified.

Yeah, it's just that...I like allstocks...and I didn't like that I was banned...I wouldn't try to do something detrimental to Bob's business...that's unethical...
 
Posted by imakmony2005 on :
 
Thanks FLY, seals are the dogs of the sea man about a month ago one almost bit me big male wow i was scared, sunny nice 80 plus. Well i hope we started something today and this Q- car gets going. LOL. STAY WARM.
 
Posted by firefly on :
 
mjm get over it, I have been banned before.
Gettng borng.
 
Posted by buckwheatbob on :
 
Haliburton.....beautiful place for sledding!

quote:
Originally posted by MillerTIME:
Hey all you canadians, im headin up there soon for a christmas holiday. I will be staying up at our lake house up in haliburton so it better be cold enough for the lake to be frozen to play a little hockey and of course, get that snow up to at least 2 feet!

Anybody wants to come over, we normally bring a pump up and flood a rink size space on our lake and turn it into a big hockey game. Ya gotta love haliburton!


 
Posted by mjm2005 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by firefly:
mjm get over it, I have been banned before.
Gettng borng.

I'm sorry I didn't realize it was a common occurrence...damn, how quick people turn on others these days..
 
Posted by firefly on :
 
WOW scary imak. 20s here tonight. Hope you get some good surf. Yes imo Q is getting interesting but the pps sure suck.
 
Posted by buckwheatbob on :
 
Hey , I will take the diving as well Rod. I will get out to your boat one of these days. However , bringing sleds up from under the ice was a blast. (insurance recovery)Paid well too.

quote:
Originally posted by Penny-Trader:
buckwheat you can have it lol

i prefer my summer sports

lol

i like snwmobiling but i will take the boating and diving any day lol

Rod


 
Posted by imakmony2005 on :
 
mjm, you do tend to go on and on. bob seems to have help you what do you want?
 
Posted by buckwheatbob on :
 
20's? Man I am sweating just thinking about it. Fireplace is on here. Brings in the Christmas spirit.

quote:
Originally posted by firefly:
WOW scary imak. 20s here tonight. Hope you get some good surf. Yes imo Q is getting interesting but the pps sure suck.


 
Posted by mjm2005 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by imakmony2005:
mjm, you do tend to go on and on. bob seems to have help you what do you want?

fine fine fine...turn on me...all i wanted was to be able to change my profile every now and then...

Cause I'm stuck with that Voltaire quote forever it seems...and I know you don't like me imak...so fine...I was just annoyed this morning...that's all...so maybe the banning was a good thing for you all since you don't care what I want to say...I have brought some interesting stuff over in the past, and have tried to be as unbiased as possible...but fine...if no one cares...

And it only SEEMS like I go on and on...cause who else is posting at 4 in the morning?
 
Posted by firefly on :
 
Hi buck,,Keep that up in Canada. LOL
Hope you are well and warm.
 
Posted by whizknock on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Penny-Trader:
Hey Whiz i was wondering where you where.

haven't heard from Doc either.

im happy about the pr about Australia, but im more interested in the planet out connection.

that is the big deal in my mind right now.

we are targeting 5 million Gay and Gay friendly contacts that are already paying for gay material. I see this as the largest target audience that we could ever get our message to.

this one is huge.

the Australia deal only has 50,000 subscribers is what i understand. there are 10 million people that could potentially buy the satellite dish but only 50,000 that actually have it.

now on the other side of the coin. Selectv could gain a lot of new subscribers if the word can be spread about this programming.

it will eventually pay off for us.

the Plantout deal though i think will give us a quicker response in that if only 10% of them wanted Q that would mean that 500,000 people would be looking to sign up. if they dont have it in their area, then the pressure on the carriers will be enormous, and should be sufficient to force the carrier to carry this channel.

the wick is lit and the barrel is in danger of exploding.

wooooo i can hear the bang now.

Rod

quote:
Originally posted by whizknock:
quote:
Originally posted by firefly:
Global,,Didn't I say that before. [Big Grin]

Yes! I used to write that Genuine Broadcasting "International" TV Networks do not trade for less than a dollar a share & you told me that should be changed to "Global"!

That was almost a year ago & it was due to a hint that something was happening in Austrailia. Imagine that. LOL!


I'm hanging in there Rod!

Truth! I was very pissed with Frank for allowing a resourseful poster here to break news of the additional 10 billion shares. I've been in his corner for two years now whenever people had negative stuff to say. I don't bash stocks if I'm unhappy with them. If I don't have anything good to say I don't write. I did confied in a couple people on this board & then just consentrated on making money elsewhere.

Yes the news is excellent but I badly want Frank to show his cards. I've made a mint elsewhere & in fact "elsewhere" is still racking up gains.

But I want to add one more huge buy here & waiting for Frank to simply publish that damn audit.

I still see a monster payoff here. But I just don't want to buy anymore QBID till Frank does the right thing! Anyway that's all the crying I'll do now.

Very best of luck to you! You're a class act!!!
 
Posted by Penny-Trader on :
 
That would be cool but that is 4 hours from where i live, and i usually work most of the Christmas holidays.

drop me a line when you are going, and once we get a bit closer to that date i will see if i can get up there. never been to Haliburton.

Rod


quote:
Originally posted by MillerTIME:
Hey all you canadians, im headin up there soon for a christmas holiday. I will be staying up at our lake house up in haliburton so it better be cold enough for the lake to be frozen to play a little hockey and of course, get that snow up to at least 2 feet!

Anybody wants to come over, we normally bring a pump up and flood a rink size space on our lake and turn it into a big hockey game. Ya gotta love haliburton!


 
Posted by Penny-Trader on :
 
I hear you Whiz.

we do miss hearing from you though.

hopefully he will show it soon.

i keep thinking to myself though that Frank is going to do exactly what he has to do to make this company proffitable. once that happens, it wont matter what is in that audit as it is old news.

once he gets the company into a proffit situation the pps will fall into place and show a proper valuation.

There is a reason why he is not showing it, and i feel that by showing it, he will hinder his plans

Rod
 
Posted by whizknock on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Penny-Trader:
I hear you Whiz.

we do miss hearing from you though.

hopefully he will show it soon.

i keep thinking to myself though that Frank is going to do exactly what he has to do to make this company proffitable. once that happens, it wont matter what is in that audit as it is old news.

once he gets the company into a proffit situation the pps will fall into place and show a proper valuation.

There is a reason why he is not showing it, and i feel that by showing it, he will hinder his plans

Rod

I'm hanging in there! Thanks Rod!
 
Posted by firefly on :
 
Tax time for me.
 
Posted by Optimus Prime on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by firefly:
Jackets stung themselves this year ouch.
Love Bama too. What can I say. Meet you at Joes will buy a coffee for you. hehe

Roll Tide!!!!

Signed, World's Biggest Crimson Tide Fan
 
Posted by skrewball on :
 
Hey all. Long time lurker, seldom poster. I was wondering if someone with some financial know how could give me some feedback on an idea about Qbid.

Would it be feasible for the company to take out a loan of $5-$10mil, using our current assets (Over $1bil right?) as collateral. Then use that money to buy back and retire shares (10-20billion*.0005). Now I am coming from limited financial knowledge. So before just saying, "That's stupid, no way!" Would you mind explaining why? Cause I got my 4.7mil shares on hold and I am tired of living in the desert! [Smile] Thanks.
 
Posted by sidhartha on :
 
Posted by: dr_silkworth2002
In reply to: None Date:11/22/2005 11:02:47 PM
Post #of 189908

Starting to get some renewed confidence in QBID again. I haven't been following as close but today's doubleheader got my attention.

I feel QTN is being just as aggressive as they can be to move their network to the top of the pecking order in GLBT viewing entertainment.

I know the O/S is swollen beyond recognition. Something keeps telling me that Frank will get this to a point where he can buy back chuncks of the O/S until it disapppears.

I can see this audit thing dragging out until mid 2006. If we do get an audit....it will be so out of date people will be really mad. My thought is as long as a value can't be placed on QBID and O/S is swollen....we'll stay at a very low pps. If Frank gets QTN to where it is raking in monthly revs that are huge....he'll be buying back without PR'ing it. Then...whamo... he puts out a PR stating the O/S is 5 billion shares an all the naysayers will be standing empty handed.

Of course on the other hand.....we might be empty handed if none of this pans out. LOL.

i think the ole CEO has a plan and ain't about to tell anyone what it is. LOL

Doc
-------------------------------------
Posted by: TheDukeOfEarl
In reply to: dr_silkworth2002 who wrote msg# 189838 Date:11/22/2005 11:26:22 PM
Post #of 189908

DrSilk..

I think you have something there.

There are a few things we must all admit.

1: The network is real and it has a real product.

2: Frank has sold a load of shares to fund it.

3: Frank wants to sell it at some point and make money from it.


ok lets look at these things. #1 is plain to see. #2 is also a done deal. now #3 For frank to make money he had to sell shares to build this thing. Now once its all built its worthless because of the huge number of shares. He needs to reduce the count. RS sucks. I don't think he wants that route. His only answer is a buyback. If #1 is true and doing really well (lots of carriers and subs) Then the PPS would go up too high to buy shares back considering the huge number out there.
He has to keep the PPS down as long as he can. The network must be fully built and making some serious income but have a very low PPS. Frank could be holding up the audit till it is outdated. The info would be old and useless. It would not give a view of the current company. This would give Frank a buy back window. A period of time when money was coming in to buy shares but the PPS would still suck.
I watch Frank make really great moves and then turn around and make a newbie mistake that someone of his years should not. Unless he wants to....

Food for thought.
------------------------------------------------
Posted by: dr_silkworth2002
In reply to: TheDukeOfEarl who wrote msg# 189853 Date:11/22/2005 11:34:16 PM
Post #of 189908

yes duke....and as he buys back shares...he'll be retiring a percentage of his shares along with it to keep his 53% controlling interest. As he retires the shares he has so freely given himself as the O/S has gone up....the O/S can and should return to a much, much lower number prett quick. of course all depending on the stock price.

i don't think frank is in a big hurry to get the pps up. it could be working in the long term shareholders favor....if we have the patience to see this through.

doc
-------------------------------------------------
Posted by: mr_geronimo
In reply to: dr_silkworth2002 who wrote msg# 189856 Date:11/22/2005 11:46:55 PM
Post #of 189908

I definitely agree with that last statement... he probably isn't in any rush to get the PPS up. I hope he has plans for the opportunity... that's about all I can do at this time... hope.
---------------------------------------------
Posted by: mr_geronimo
In reply to: dr_silkworth2002 who wrote msg# 189856 Date:11/22/2005 11:46:55 PM
Post #of 189908

I definitely agree with that last statement... he probably isn't in any rush to get the PPS up. I hope he has plans for the opportunity... that's about all I can do at this time... hope.
 
Posted by a4realguy on :
 
No audit... SSDD
 
Posted by Dew-it on :
 
huge volume this AM in only ten minues and only ONE sell for 5M and one for 10K everything else - all buys????
vol 235M
11X.0004
9X.0005
 
Posted by imakmony2005 on :
 
Same old QBID,.0004 NICE FRANK.
 
Posted by noah129 on :
 
hang in their qbidians your day is coming!!!
 
Posted by tarq3 on :
 
huge volume early on
 
Posted by Dew-it on :
 
wow....this is CRAZY volume! 420M in 20 minutes. All buys (~90%). I have never seen this - NOT EVEN CMKX had this much this quick???
 
Posted by Dustoff101 on :
 
imakmony, nothing but close out sets, and sloppy mush!LOL

Don't get all wound up folks, that's surfing jargon..LOL
 
Posted by GatorMan on :
 
There's a lot of talk about the importance of a share buyback to reduce the O/S. But let's consider what Frank's real goal is here. I believe all along he's said he wants to get this network up and running and then sell it. Well, folks, I have to tell you that the size of the O/S has no bearing, none whatsoever, on how much money the company will sell for. The company is worth what it's worth. End of story. So if Franks & family own 53%, and somehow maintain that while still dumping, then they will get 53% of the price paid. So from Frank's point of view he could care less what the O/S is. 60 billion or 60 trillion he still gets the same amount of money. We other shareholders are the ones who get screwed. The only incentive I can see that he has for a share buyback it to give the illusion that the O/S is being reduced, raising the price on the speculation of such, and then being able to trade shares for services at a more favorable rate. We've seen this in the past with the paltry share buybacks while dumping 5 times the buyback amount on the market.

So in my cynical view there is no sense even talking about a buyback. It isn't going to happen, at least not with a net affect of reducing the O/S.
 
Posted by a4realguy on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Dew-it:
wow....this is CRAZY volume! 420M in 20 minutes. All buys (~90%). I have never seen this - NOT EVEN CMKX had this much this quick???

I may be wrong but I believe you cannot trust the apparant buy-sell postings from a pink sheet as per this article:
http://www.sec.gov/rules/concept/s72499/klaser1.txt

So hard to know what is really going on.. if I am wrong, someone please help meout..
 
Posted by imakmony2005 on :
 
DUSTOFF, No its 4 ft and good im out there. good to see you ,what a blowout that night.
 
Posted by tarq3 on :
 
half a biLLion almost aLL at the ask in the first 30min of trading.


PS. last year Qbid ran the day before Turkey day and then also ran on the half day after.
 
Posted by Dew-it on :
 
Sorry 4Real, can't help you out. I just call like I see it (Level 2's). [Wink]

quote:
Originally posted by a4realguy:
quote:
Originally posted by Dew-it:
wow....this is CRAZY volume! 420M in 20 minutes. All buys (~90%). I have never seen this - NOT EVEN CMKX had this much this quick???

I may be wrong but I believe you cannot trust the apparant buy-sell postings from a pink sheet as per this article:
http://www.sec.gov/rules/concept/s72499/klaser1.txt

So hard to know what is really going on.. if I am wrong, someone please help meout..


 
Posted by Dew-it on :
 
did something leak out? or is it the Aussies (SP?) buying some QBID?
 
Posted by a4realguy on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Dew-it:
did something leak out? or is it the Aussies (SP?) buying some QBID?

as per my previous post, whos says anyone is buying? How do you know?
 
Posted by Dew-it on :
 
this is really CRAZY! Still ALL buys!
vol 702M
11X.0004
7X.0005
 
Posted by a4realguy on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Dew-it:
this is really CRAZY! Still ALL buys!
vol 702M
11X.0004
7X.0005

Maybe not...
 
Posted by MillerTIME on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Dew-it:
this is really CRAZY! Still ALL buys!
vol 702M
11X.0004
7X.0005

u seein this dewit???everybody, lets not get to excited, but somebody is loading the boat, and i bet its the person who was buying all those shares at .0004 and held us at .0004 for 15 days when we should have gone lower.

a4realguy, these are definately buys...yes they may do match prints but it would be ridicolous for them to fake print all these trades. pinks are differnt but not that different.
and MM are comming off the ask
 
Posted by Dew-it on :
 
I am watching my L2's. additionlly, the ASK is thinning, why? because buys are coming in.. Like I said, I call it like I see it. No pumping or bashing. [Wink]

quote:
Originally posted by a4realguy:
quote:
Originally posted by Dew-it:
did something leak out? or is it the Aussies (SP?) buying some QBID?

as per my previous post, whos says anyone is buying? How do you know?

 
Posted by a4realguy on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by MillerTIME:
quote:
Originally posted by Dew-it:
this is really CRAZY! Still ALL buys!
vol 702M
11X.0004
7X.0005

u seein this dewit???everybody, lets not get to excited, but somebody is loading the boat, and i bet its the person who was buying all those shares at .0004 and held us at .0004 for 15 days when we should have gone lower.

a4realguy, these are definately buys...yes they may do match prints but it would be ridicolous for them to fake print all these trades. pinks are differnt but not that different.
and MM are comming off the ask

Thats an answer I can appreciate.. some factual data and analysis.. thanks..
 
Posted by noah129 on :
 
not sure whats going on but i like the volume i have a hard time beleiving this is dilution at this point.it very well could be but i think somone is loading up lets hope its franky hehe.
 
Posted by noah129 on :
 
are we gonna hit a billion shares before eleven o'clock? this is huge volume either its yesterdays news or someone knows something we dont.
 
Posted by mjm2005 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by noah129:
are we gonna hit a billion shares before eleven o'clock? this is huge volume either its yesterdays news or someone knows something we dont.

Audit? This afternoon?? [Big Grin]
 
Posted by noah129 on :
 
that would be sweet could be a nice thanxgiving present from franky to the longs. bring on the audit bring on the subs this stock is going to da moon all in my silly humble opinion please do your dd i am a crazed qbidiot pumper hahaha.
 
Posted by Bottomliner on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by noah129:
...either its yesterdays news or someone knows something we dont.

noah
I found out a long time ago that
someone ALWAYS knows something I don't. [Big Grin] [Confused]
 
Posted by noah129 on :
 
aint that the truth bottomliner haha. so what do you make of all this volume today? is it possible that frank is buyback shares or am i dilusional and still just a stupid qbidiot who only see's the good.
 
Posted by Dew-it on :
 
i did a quick count and we had 21 sells (about 120M) everything else were buys ask - so thats about 700+M = $350K that has been invested in QBID. IMO it is not Frankie, so who?
 
Posted by Numa on :
 
Weird. Why the hell didn't this uptick?
 
Posted by Dew-it on :
 
looks like we are gonna hit 1B very soon
910M
11X.0004
6X.0005
 
Posted by g-invest on :
 
quote:
LISTEN!!!!!
There really is a scam going on here!!!!
Just think of those hundred plus employees saps that THINK they have a job. They better cash their paycheck fast!

Actually, they don't have to. Frank increased the A/S by another 10 billion. At .0001, that's still a million dollars. That can pay for salaries for quite a while.

quote:
Then there is that false storefront they call a studio… probably some paint on plywood or cardboard. Maybe it’s just an old set they recycled from the old MGM lot.
I have never heard a basher call the studio a scam, so you're the first. You're horrible at imitation.

quote:
The Teleport satellite pix were an old one with a new date overlay.
Again, I don't think anyone ever said that. What they said was Frank was bailing out a dying/dead company.

quote:
Then, the easiest of all, pulling the wool over the eyes of Time Warner, RCN, Cox, Bright House, SelecTV and more. Well that was just child’s play for a SCAMMER like Frank.
quote:
Hummm… Now that I think about it… Usually when people scream things like “scam” in order to save knowledgeable people from themselves it is done to distract and cause confusion. Humm… so, I guess, it just may be that those that are giving us this free service are really the scammers. Could I be right?
Yes, you see, I mention things like:
http://gravito.com/qbid/abstain.mp3

...for a reason.  -

Frank has a history of telling us things and then lying to potential "non-forum posters". He makes up things and then tells investors like david janas who are otherwise good people that he is releasing an audit on X day. Why? Because he knows he can scam individual investors.

You need to email him at franko*qtelevision.com and tell him you're sick of it. Replace the asterisk with the "at" symbol.
 
Posted by Dew-it on :
 
60B A/S: Pinky and we still have no idea what the company is worth because we still no audit IMO.

quote:
Originally posted by Numa:
Weird. Why the hell didn't this uptick?


 
Posted by Dustoff101 on :
 
Could be an * Aussie effect * but dunno.

Some day we will have more transparency into the goings on of the MM'S, but don't hold your breath..
 
Posted by domnic on :
 
maybe a particular mm is covering his nakeds and getting out...that would be a temp buyback w/ no long term effect on the price
 
Posted by g-invest on :
 
And btw,

Frank is *NOT* buying back shares. If he says he is, he's lying too. We know this from the 3 seperate times he said they were buying back shares while they were actually diluting. This is a HORRIBLE stock to get into. Especially now when you can lose 25% of your .0004 PPS investment in just one downtick.
 
Posted by Jennifercd10 on :
 
g you missed the whole point
 
Posted by Bottomliner on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by noah129:
...so what do you make of all this volume today? is it possible that frank is buyback shares or am i dilusional and still just a stupid qbidiot who only see's the good.

noah
I won't even guess. But MillerTIME has posted a very logical possibility. Check back a few posts. His comments are always pretty solid, and he does good chart analyses too. So, my best advice is to listen to those who know.

Now for some opinion: It's possible Frank is buying back and it's posssible "someone" knows the audit is coming soon ... but I'll believe it when I see it. Although I'm obnoxiously positive about my Q investment, I usually depend on facts to get me really excited. Been disappointed too often by too many dreams during my long life. I've found that it's easier to feel happy when your expectations are lower ... also lessens the disappointments. [Wink]
 
Posted by MillerTIME on :
 
.0004x.0005
12x6

VOlume = 966M in 1 hour....

Noah, i think you asked earlier if this could be dilution. You cant dilute by buying shares, so this there is definately somebody loading up shares. The question remains who is buying up so much QBID shares. They have to be on the inside, because it sure aint the investors!

Although, noah, i bet the restricted shareholders are selling on the ask, so thats why we are seeing soooo much buys without an uptick.
 
Posted by sidhartha on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by GatorMan:
There's a lot of talk about the importance of a share buyback to reduce the O/S. But let's consider what Frank's real goal is here. I believe all along he's said he wants to get this network up and running and then sell it. Well, folks, I have to tell you that the size of the O/S has no bearing, none whatsoever, on how much money the company will sell for. The company is worth what it's worth. End of story. So if Franks & family own 53%, and somehow maintain that while still dumping, then they will get 53% of the price paid. So from Frank's point of view he could care less what the O/S is. 60 billion or 60 trillion he still gets the same amount of money. We other shareholders are the ones who get screwed. The only incentive I can see that he has for a share buyback it to give the illusion that the O/S is being reduced, raising the price on the speculation of such, and then being able to trade shares for services at a more favorable rate. We've seen this in the past with the paltry share buybacks while dumping 5 times the buyback amount on the market.

So in my cynical view there is no sense even talking about a buyback. It isn't going to happen, at least not with a net affect of reducing the O/S.

"Remove the skin from a cynic and you have a realist".
 
Posted by HighSide on :
 
if it is insider buying and if it is because of possible Audit releas then logically the speculation would be Good Audit
 
Posted by Dew-it on :
 
there it is 1Bill in under two hours.
 
Posted by MillerTIME on :
 
1.044 Billion.

Some possible people buying up the shares the last 15 days and today.

1. QTN (Frank)
2. big investors (not likely)
3. Big institions (not likely without an audit)
4. an outside company such as planetout, taking a position in QBID so that when they buy QTN they already own a portion of the business.
5. MM just buying up shares??

Other than that i really have no clue who it could be...i know i used to think it was Frank buying back shares, and this would really make the best sense, but it did throw me off when he raised the AS. So, really guys i have no idea who has been buying the shares.
 
Posted by domnic on :
 
could be the mm's naked selling to the basement---it's a definite possibility
 
Posted by DIGDOUGH on :
 
High volume. Maybe the DVD is gonna ship today.
 
Posted by MillerTIME on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by DIGDOUGH:
High volume. Maybe the DVD is gonna ship today.

LMAO!!!!ahhaahahahahahah
 
Posted by Bottomliner on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Jennifercd10:
g you missed the whole point

Jennifer
Think he missed it or just ignored it? [Roll Eyes]

By the way, I didn't miss your point and thought it was very good. I enjoy good satire. Sorry I didn't say so before. [Big Grin]
 
Posted by GatorMan on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by MillerTIME:
1.044 Billion.

Some possible people buying up the shares the last 15 days and today.

1. QTN (Frank)
2. big investors (not likely)
3. Big institions (not likely without an audit)
4. an outside company such as planetout, taking a position in QBID so that when they buy QTN they already own a portion of the business.
5. MM just buying up shares??

Other than that i really have no clue who it could be...i know i used to think it was Frank buying back shares, and this would really make the best sense, but it did throw me off when he raised the AS. So, really guys i have no idea who has been buying the shares.

6. PlanetOut/SelectTV subscribers who have just discovered QTN and see its potential.
 
Posted by Deg's wife on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Jennifercd10:
g you missed the whole point

Jen...I got ya!! and not even a rocket scientist here... [Big Grin]

I think that deserves me just a plain ole cheesecake!!

Good luck to us all....

And Whizzer...I sure do miss your sig line...
'All we ever had to do was launch'
By chance, will it be coming back [Frown]

Robin
 
Posted by MillerTIME on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by domnic:
could be the mm's naked selling to the basement---it's a definite possibility

These are buys. what this means is that it cant be.

Naked short selling
or
Dilution

The trades you see at .0004 could be, but at .0005 it cant.

.0005 are buys, somebody buying shares from somebody else who is selling shares, which is probably the restricted shareholders.
 
Posted by Dew-it on :
 
I agree IMO it is certainly NOT Frankie. Maybe it some crazy wealthy oil barron or sheik that has nothing better to do than play the PINKS LOL! Who knows...

quote:
Originally posted by MillerTIME:
1.044 Billion.

Some possible people buying up the shares the last 15 days and today.

1. QTN (Frank)
2. big investors (not likely)
3. Big institions (not likely without an audit)
4. an outside company such as planetout, taking a position in QBID so that when they buy QTN they already own a portion of the business.
5. MM just buying up shares??

Other than that i really have no clue who it could be...i know i used to think it was Frank buying back shares, and this would really make the best sense, but it did throw me off when he raised the AS. So, really guys i have no idea who has been buying the shares.


 
Posted by DIGDOUGH on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by MillerTIME:
quote:
Originally posted by DIGDOUGH:
High volume. Maybe the DVD is gonna ship today.

LMAO!!!!ahhaahahahahahah
Its so sad its funny, to think that a 4-1/2 in circular piece of plastic might lift some shareholders spirits. Perhaps just to ponder some light at the end of the dark,silent tunnel.
EEEEEHHHHHEEEEEEEEEEHHHHEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
 
Posted by mjm2005 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by MillerTIME:
1.044 Billion.

Some possible people buying up the shares the last 15 days and today.

1. QTN (Frank)
2. big investors (not likely)
3. Big institions (not likely without an audit)
4. an outside company such as planetout, taking a position in QBID so that when they buy QTN they already own a portion of the business.
5. MM just buying up shares??

Other than that i really have no clue who it could be...i know i used to think it was Frank buying back shares, and this would really make the best sense, but it did throw me off when he raised the AS. So, really guys i have no idea who has been buying the shares.

you forgot--

6) Me--just won the lottery looking to 10000x-up
 
Posted by Bottomliner on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by DIGDOUGH:
High volume. Maybe the DVD is gonna ship today.

DIG
Agree totally ... screw the audit, just give me my DVD. [Big Grin]

Just had a brilliant thought (first in a long time): I hate Christmas shopping. But if I get a couple dozen QBID DVDs, I can solve my shopping problems by "re-gifting" the DVDs. Anyone want to donate their DVD to me? Assuming we get them by Christmas ... [Roll Eyes]
 
Posted by mjm2005 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Bottomliner:
quote:
Originally posted by DIGDOUGH:
High volume. Maybe the DVD is gonna ship today.

DIG
Agree totally ... screw the audit, just give me my DVD. [Big Grin]

Just had a brilliant thought (first in a long time): I hate Christmas shopping. But if I get a couple dozen QBID DVDs, I can solve my shopping problems by "re-gifting" the DVDs. Anyone want to donate their DVD to me? Assuming we get them by Christmas ... [Roll Eyes]

I have a feeling it may be one of the hottest items on the black market...
 
Posted by mjm2005 on :
 
I love it...I refresh Yahoo and see an additional 30M volume...refresh again, another 30M...damn, and again, and again...
 
Posted by Dew-it on :
 
Bottom,

good one...you are kidding right?

quote:
Originally posted by Bottomliner:
quote:
Originally posted by DIGDOUGH:
High volume. Maybe the DVD is gonna ship today.

DIG
Agree totally ... screw the audit, just give me my DVD. [Big Grin]

Just had a brilliant thought (first in a long time): I hate Christmas shopping. But if I get a couple dozen QBID DVDs, I can solve my shopping problems by "re-gifting" the DVDs. Anyone want to donate their DVD to me? Assuming we get them by Christmas ... [Roll Eyes]


 
Posted by domnic on :
 
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by domnic:
could be the mm's naked selling to the basement---it's a definite possibility
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

These are buys. what this means is that it cant be.

Naked short selling
or
Dilution

The trades you see at .0004 could be, but at .0005 it cant.

.0005 are buys, somebody buying shares from somebody else who is selling shares, which is probably the restricted shareholders.

--------------------
Here's a scenario....keep in mind that's all it is...

a particular mm is getting out of pinks or whatever...they begin covering their naked shorts by buying what they can at .0005

the other mm's continue to sell naked at .0005 on the offer until the bidder's volume dries up...effectively keeping the stock down.

the difference to selling on the bid or offer is active or passive...

the sellers may be restrictive shareholders, or it may be mm's naked selling
 
Posted by Bottomliner on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by mjm2005:
I have a feeling it (the DVD) may be one of the hottest items on the black market...

mjm
Which is why we don't have them yet ... the entire shipment probably was hijacked and sent to third world countries where the demand for DVDs on emerging GLBT networks is skyrocketing. Now you know the "rest of the story." [Eek!]
 
Posted by MillerTIME on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by domnic:
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by domnic:
could be the mm's naked selling to the basement---it's a definite possibility
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

These are buys. what this means is that it cant be.

Naked short selling
or
Dilution

The trades you see at .0004 could be, but at .0005 it cant.

.0005 are buys, somebody buying shares from somebody else who is selling shares, which is probably the restricted shareholders.

--------------------
Here's a scenario....keep in mind that's all it is...

a particular mm is getting out of pinks or whatever...they begin covering their naked shorts by buying what they can at .0005

the other mm's continue to sell naked at .0005 on the offer until the bidder's volume dries up...effectively keeping the stock down.

the difference to selling on the bid or offer is active or passive...

the sellers may be restrictive shareholders, or it may be mm's naked selling

Very interesting dominic, you sound like you know your trading and MM stuff! How long have you been trading.

Could very well be that the MM could still be naked shorting, but i highly doubt they are doing much illegal activities these days with all the attention QBID has. QBID is the monster of the pink sheets, and for them to be naked shorting still would be insane.
 
Posted by MillerTIME on :
 
These are the alltime volume high days in QBID. See if we can break alltime high today. Trading has slowed of late.

2/4/2004 1,187,103,6162/11/2004 1,352,267,6484/15/2004 1,436,485,12011/18/2005 1,511,399,8084/13/2004 1,567,453,1843/21/2005 1,578,814,9765/11/2004 1,623,194,7524/14/2004 1,825,717,7602/10/2004 2,147,483,648
 
Posted by DIGDOUGH on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Bottomliner:
quote:
Originally posted by DIGDOUGH:
High volume. Maybe the DVD is gonna ship today.

DIG
Agree totally ... screw the audit, just give me my DVD. [Big Grin]

Just had a brilliant thought (first in a long time): I hate Christmas shopping. But if I get a couple dozen QBID DVDs, I can solve my shopping problems by "re-gifting" the DVDs. Anyone want to donate their DVD to me? Assuming we get them by Christmas ... [Roll Eyes]

B/L thats an amusing thought, but the promise of a DVD is also something to take into account when weighing the importance of us shareholders in the eyes of Q mgmnt. It would be better if they never mentioned the DVD. How about a little explanation about where it is or isn't. I'm not crazy. I just been told too many things that don't happen in too short of a space of time to not feel left out of the loop again. I'd rather see the audit, but getting the dvd would have been a good example of following through on shareholder interest.
 
Posted by Dew-it on :
 
MT did you notice that DOMS changed is size from 50000 back to 5000? has be on top ASK for the last 15 min.
 
Posted by domnic on :
 
I don't know much...I work on a trade desk for a b/d so the mkt's always infront of me.

I don't have experience mm'ing, but have plenty of experience forcing mm'ers to either improve fills or execute orders when they're scammin away...otcbb and pink sheet mm'ers do it all the time. They know that the majority of retail fills won't be questioned and they take advantage of that fact. When they're called on it they usually always accommodate, knowing that the next trade is the next opportunity.

I took the day off so I'm watching the mkt's instead of getting ready for my thanksgiving dinner....augh [Razz]
 
Posted by MillerTIME on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Dew-it:
MT did you notice that DOMS changed is size from 50000 back to 5000? has be on top ASK for the last 15 min.

yeah, good eye dewit. interesting, and i dont know if it really means anything. If so, then DOMS is playing buy the rules...

the reason i didnt get to excited with DOMS big order size was because we used to see VERT sell for days on end with the small order size. But DOMS could very well have been the MM selling the past 15 days on the ask, so by him reducing order size he may be close to getting off the ask.

I dont think him being on the top means anything because i think alphatrade just puts them at the top of the page when they change their price, or ordersize thus giving them a different timestamp. But this has been something i have yet to be able to learn. Is how do you understand which MM is on the inside ask/bid. The only way i know is by following it really close and see who was the first MM on the inside ask/bid
 
Posted by DontPass on :
 
Oh my dilution!!!

Volume over 1 billion and the stock hasnt moved.

I would have to say there is over 500 billion shares outstanding.

Frank deserves jail time.
 
Posted by Jennifercd10 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Deg's wife:
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Jennifercd10:
[qb] g you missed the whole point

Jen...I got ya!! and not even a rocket scientist here... [Big Grin]

I think that deserves me just a plain ole cheesecake!!

I was just having a little fun...
I'm looking forward to Las Vegas and cheesecake for all!
 
Posted by Bottomliner on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Dew-it:
Bottom, good one...you are kidding right?

Dew
Kinda kidding, kinda not.

Kidding about the DVD, of course. Liked the idea, but couldn't care less about getting it.

Kinda kidding about the audit. I want to see it, but I don't really think it'll push the PPS significantly higher (a momentary spike at best). I've rather see Q making solid advancements into the marketplace, which is Q's long-term future.

But I am absolutely NOT KIDDING about hating to Christmas shop, and I welcome any help getting out of it. [Frown]
 
Posted by Penny-Trader on :
 
1.2 in volume and only 11 sales.

this should be moving up.

it is not.

we are going to hear dilution theories. They may be true.

nothing can explain this in my opinion.

has anyone checked to see if the A/S has been raised as of this morning.

someone is buying a lot of very huge lots of shares. maybe there is more info to come out.

very strange though to have this kind of volume this early in the day.

we are going to hit 2 billion shares at this rate.

the last time this happened was on the run to .029 a year and a half ago.

Rod
 
Posted by DIGDOUGH on :
 
I just figured out that the dilution doesn't matter to Frank, because if we keep buying shares we will compensate for the loss by holding more shares. Is that possible? Yea, it is possible, if we were rich enough.
hahahaha. [Big Grin]
 
Posted by Ligge on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Bottomliner:
quote:
Originally posted by mjm2005:
I have a feeling it (the DVD) may be one of the hottest items on the black market...

mjm
Which is why we don't have them yet ... the entire shipment probably was hijacked and sent to third world countries where the demand for DVDs on emerging GLBT networks is skyrocketing. Now you know the "rest of the story." [Eek!]

They are only included with Xbox 360s that were bought directly from Microsoft on Monday. Geez, don't you people know anything?????
 
Posted by domnic on :
 
per my understanding, pinksheets.com is only a trading platform utilized by mm's in non reporting otc securities....there's no inside mm, or rather there's no time priority w/ pink sheets. a pink sheet mm can either execute via pinksheets.com or pick up the phone and get the order done verbally.

Also, level 2's typically let you format from various options how the orders are reflected...such as price/time or price/size...
 
Posted by Dew-it on :
 
yea, I am not sure (i have speculation) but DOMS did this after we hit 1B or so and if you have noticed the volume has slowed down. He is still selling, his time stamp has changed several times since and he keeps going on to top...

quote:
Originally posted by MillerTIME:
quote:
Originally posted by Dew-it:
MT did you notice that DOMS changed is size from 50000 back to 5000? has be on top ASK for the last 15 min.

yeah, good eye dewit. interesting, and i dont know if it really means anything. If so, then DOMS is playing buy the rules...

the reason i didnt get to excited with DOMS big order size was because we used to see VERT sell for days on end with the small order size. But DOMS could very well have been the MM selling the past 15 days on the ask, so by him reducing order size he may be close to getting off the ask.

I dont think him being on the top means anything because i think alphatrade just puts them at the top of the page when they change their price, or ordersize thus giving them a different timestamp. But this has been something i have yet to be able to learn. Is how do you understand which MM is on the inside ask/bid. The only way i know is by following it really close and see who was the first MM on the inside ask/bid


 
Posted by Bottomliner on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by DIGDOUGH:
... the promise of a DVD is also something to take into account when weighing the importance of us shareholders in the eyes of Q mgmnt. It would be better if they never mentioned the DVD. How about a little explanation about where it is or isn't. I'm not crazy. I just been told too many things that don't happen in too short of a space of time to not feel left out of the loop again. I'd rather see the audit, but getting the dvd would have been a good example of following through on shareholder interest.

DIG
Agree.
 
Posted by DIGDOUGH on :
 
I don't remember voting for more dilution, which is what I was told that the process would be, according to the CC in Oct?
 
Posted by Dew-it on :
 
cool. but, I hear ya about the XMas shopping.. [Wink]

quote:
Originally posted by Bottomliner:
quote:
Originally posted by Dew-it:
Bottom, good one...you are kidding right?

Dew
Kinda kidding, kinda not.

Kidding about the DVD, of course. Liked the idea, but couldn't care less about getting it.

Kinda kidding about the audit. I want to see it, but I don't really think it'll push the PPS significantly higher (a momentary spike at best). I've rather see Q making solid advancements into the marketplace, which is Q's long-term future.

But I am absolutely NOT KIDDING about hating to Christmas shop, and I welcome any help getting out of it. [Frown]


 
Posted by g-invest on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by MillerTIME:
Some possible people buying up the shares the last 15 days and today.

You forgot to consider MM's covering short positions. Not "naked short positions", just short positions. Again, this is unlikely, I think this stock went to the gutter on dilution, not shorting.

And bottom and jenn, I didn't miss the fact it was satire, I was just pointing out it was a weak form of it because it addressed issues that no basher ever has. If you're going to "poke fun" at the bashers, it is better to do it on issues that they've been wrong about and Frank has shown otherwise.

As far as I know, the bashers have mainly been harping the 60 billion authorized shares issue, and the lack of an audit. I truly feel that this stock is going nowhere while these both remain unaddressed.

Frank hasn't even bothered to comment on the audit, so it is likely he finds all of us too stupid to point out that he's missed yet another date.

Then again, maybe Frank sold the restricted stock with the implication that they had to be bought at .0005. If that is the case, then it would make sense that he's gobbling up the .0004 shares. I find it just as likely it is stupid investors or MM's exchanging shares, but I won't throw out the idea of a new CEO through a reverse IPO. Like one of Frank's kids, Renee, or whoever owns that satellite company.
 
Posted by DontPass on :
 
dude didnt even know the price of the stock "allegedly." its obvious he doesnt care about the shareholders.

he will keep acting the same and the shareholders will keep buying the stocks.

his project gets funded, he gets rich, and the shareholders will be left with millions of shares that are worth less than the napkin you use to wipe your face tomorrow night.
 
Posted by Bottomliner on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Ligge:
They (the DVDs) are only included with Xbox 360s that were bought directly from Microsoft on Monday. Geez, don't you people know anything?????

Ligge
So I was partly right: They WERE sent to a third world country ... Microsoft qualifies as a third world country, right? It's got more free cash than most third world countries make in a year. [Big Grin]
 
Posted by Penny-Trader on :
 
that is fine to say someone is buying but who is selling.

this doesnt look good to me.

if you sold your shares today you would have to sell at the bid and it would show as the mms buy them.
then they would post the buy at the ask.

no one is selling and all these buys are coming in from somewhere.

i tend to lean towards a dilution going on today, I cant prove it, but that is what it looks like to me.

some one correct me if im wrong.

something funny is going on here in my opinion.

Rod

quote:
Originally posted by noah129:
not sure whats going on but i like the volume i have a hard time beleiving this is dilution at this point.it very well could be but i think somone is loading up lets hope its franky hehe.


 
Posted by domnic on :
 
if the mm's knew frank was diluting by selling x/amount of shares then they would also be shorting their inventory. Upon knowing frank's near completion of dilution, time for mm's to cover shorts. shorts covered, then time to short again on a small bump...mm'ers goal is to milk these micro's for as long as they can...

speculative of course...I don't know what's going on...but one idea
 
Posted by g-invest on :
 
quote:
Could very well be that the MM could still be naked shorting, but i highly doubt they are doing much illegal activities these days with all the attention QBID has. QBID is the monster of the pink sheets, and for them to be naked shorting still would be insane.
I agree with MillerTime here. Naked shorting just doesn't happen to the degree that many forum posters say it does. CMKX is a good example of a stock where people kept screaming both naked shorting and dilution, and the dilution folks ended up being right. There were over 700 billion shares outstanding in CMKX.

Now, QBID is further from a scam than CMKX, but not by much due to the complete and utter incompetence of this CEO when it comes to dealing with shareholders. Frank (and jenn and bottom, for that matter) doesn't think we have reason to be upset that he's been doing billions of dollars of dilution in the form of restriced shares. Why? Because it's not him that is selling the shares. But if he says, "You can buy 5 billion shares at .0005 and sell them at whatever you want", that is as good as diluting. It sets a max or top on a stock. And also, I suppose, sets a bottom as well.

Even if the dilution is delayed for 6 months or however, it's still dilution via the restricted shares. The fact that he has raised the A/S should be a good indicator that this type of selling will only continue.

And Penny-Trader is right, we're only going to hear more dilution theories. You won't hear any specifically from me, because I already said what I think is happening. It's dilution via a third party, and just because Frank isn't selling the shares directly doesn't mean that it isn't a very bad thing for him to be doing.
 
Posted by DontPass on :
 
.0004

Dilution has hit again.

the outstanding shares is approaching 1 trillion.

Frank deserves Jail.
 
Posted by Dustoff101 on :
 
If there is an announcement that there will be be a Restricted share dividend handed out, run for the hills!LOL
 
Posted by domnic on :
 
the last time qbid bought back, they completed it on the last day w/ a flurry...running the price up to .0068 or somethin...

today opens w/ a frenzy...calms down...interested to see how noon and the end of the day go...

w/ this volume the offer's are either mm's shorting to hold the stock down and maintain their profits or the company. if it's the mm's then you'll never see this stock rise above .0006 again barring a reverse split or name/cusip/venue change.

if it's the company...then why? why now?

...and so who are the buyer's? if the mm's are selling on the offer then their doing everything they can to maintain price...but w/ that kind of bidding you'd have to believe they'd pull back a bit to sell at a better price of .0006 so I'm leaning away from this idea.

because i'm leaning away from the mm's being the sellers then I'm leaning towards the company being the sellers. The buyer's must then be the mm's or investors...

so much speculation...it'd be neat to be right w/ my last post...but there's probably more to it than this...who knows
 
Posted by Ad astra on :
 
1 TRILLION...I wonder if Frank is part of The Alan Parsons Project?

Maybe Frank is selling to pay for a tank for or sharks with lasers attached to them?
 
Posted by domnic on :
 
and I yield to ginvest's third party restricted stock selling, that could be
 
Posted by Ad astra on :
 
Ugh. I cant spell today. Too much Franciscan Oakville Estates last night. [Smile]

At least there is the entertainment value of it all...
 
Posted by Jennifercd10 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by DontPass:
.0004

Dilution has hit again.

the outstanding shares is approaching 1 trillion.

Frank deserves Jail.

Please show us the link where you got this information.
 
Posted by MillerTIME on :
 
PlanetOut to Distribute Q Television Video
› › › ClickZ News

By Pamela Parker | November 22, 2005


Gay and lesbian media company PlanetOut Inc. will distribute highlights of video from the Q Television (QTN) satellite network, under the terms of a deal announced today.

Financial terms of the agreement weren't disclosed, but Mark Elderkin, president of PlanetOut, told ClickZ, "The value for our company is quality content that we can sell advertising against. The value for the producer is distribution and access to an audience they could otherwise not reach."

The deal will give PlanetOut more video inventory on its PlanetOut Video broadband service, which launched in September. The company offers :15 pre-roll spots and sponsorships of its video content. Ads can be targeted by content, by gender, by age, by location, and using behavioral criteria.

Elderkin says the company has sold mostly in-banner video ads thus far, but it's ramping up its in-stream inventory to meet demand from advertisers.

"For 2006, as we book new business for next year, we're seeing more and more requests from the agencies we work with to include that [video]," he said. "We're doing all we can to grow our video archives."

The QTN video will consist of five- to 15-minute highlights from news, talk and variety shows, including a morning talk show called "Brunch;" the celebrity entertainment talk show "On Q Live;" and "QTN World News."

PlanetOut also distributes video clips from here!TV and Sundance Channel. It's considering developing original video in-house and Webcasting user-generated content.

"We don't produce anything in-house today but it's something we're evaluating," Elderkin said.

The video initiative isn't the only move PlanetOut is making to incorporate traditional media into its portfolio of ad offerings. The company recently purchased LPI media, whose properties include print publications "The Advocate," "OUT," "The OUT Traveler," and "HIVPlus," along with their Web site counterparts.

http://www.clickz.com/news/article.php/3566166
 
Posted by Bottomliner on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by DontPass:
...Dilution has hit again. the outstanding shares is approaching 1 trillion.

DontPass
Please explain ... ?
 
Posted by King Crimson on :
 
quote:
It's dilution via a third party, and just because Frank isn't selling the shares directly doesn't mean that it isn't a very bad thing for him to be doing.
previously posted about this back here...

Public corporations that have executed Equity Private Placements
(i.e., PIPEs and Rule 144a transactions) of at least US$1.0 million since January 1, 2001

Triangle MultiMedia Inc. [ Q Television Network ]

http://www.privateraise.com/search/issuerlist.php3?sortkey=T
 
Posted by Dustoff101 on :
 
[QUOTE]Originally posted by domnic:
[QB] and I yield to ginvest's third party restricted stock selling, that could be.

------------------------------------------------
Yep, I concur..Or maybe one of um has his Yacht in dry dock and needs a re-fit.LOL

Orrrrrr, maybe capitulation!
 
Posted by Dustoff101 on :
 
Today, stock is down 33.33% at 0.0004
 
Posted by a4realguy on :
 
more SSDD
 
Posted by Zacktrade on :
 
level 2? anyone please :-p
 
Posted by MillerTIME on :
 
.0004x.0005
11x6

Volume = 1.26B
 
Posted by Zacktrade on :
 
thx miller
 
Posted by suzainiee on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by King Crimson:
quote:
It's dilution via a third party, and just because Frank isn't selling the shares directly doesn't mean that it isn't a very bad thing for him to be doing.
previously posted about this back here...

Public corporations that have executed Equity Private Placements
(i.e., PIPEs and Rule 144a transactions) of at least US$1.0 million since January 1, 2001

Triangle MultiMedia Inc. [ Q Television Network ]

http://www.privateraise.com/search/issuerlist.php3?sortkey=T

--------------------------------------------------

"Based upon the findings of this certified audit, senior management and the Board of Directors will immediately meet in Las Vegas on Tuesday, November 1, 2005 to implement a financial structure to further develop the company.

Sincerely,

Frank Olsen"

.......immediately meet to implement a financial structure

.......to further develop the company.
 
Posted by Penny-Trader on :
 
G i dont know if you realised this or not but Jenn was joking when she wrote that message.

she was being sarcastic.

lol

i thought it was very funny actually.

ROd

quote:
Originally posted by g-invest:
quote:
LISTEN!!!!!
There really is a scam going on here!!!!
Just think of those hundred plus employees saps that THINK they have a job. They better cash their paycheck fast!

Actually, they don't have to. Frank increased the A/S by another 10 billion. At .0001, that's still a million dollars. That can pay for salaries for quite a while.

quote:
Then there is that false storefront they call a studio… probably some paint on plywood or cardboard. Maybe it’s just an old set they recycled from the old MGM lot.
I have never heard a basher call the studio a scam, so you're the first. You're horrible at imitation.

quote:
The Teleport satellite pix were an old one with a new date overlay.
Again, I don't think anyone ever said that. What they said was Frank was bailing out a dying/dead company.

quote:
Then, the easiest of all, pulling the wool over the eyes of Time Warner, RCN, Cox, Bright House, SelecTV and more. Well that was just child’s play for a SCAMMER like Frank.
quote:
Hummm… Now that I think about it… Usually when people scream things like “scam” in order to save knowledgeable people from themselves it is done to distract and cause confusion. Humm… so, I guess, it just may be that those that are giving us this free service are really the scammers. Could I be right?
Yes, you see, I mention things like:
http://gravito.com/qbid/abstain.mp3

...for a reason.  -

Frank has a history of telling us things and then lying to potential "non-forum posters". He makes up things and then tells investors like david janas who are otherwise good people that he is releasing an audit on X day. Why? Because he knows he can scam individual investors.

You need to email him at franko*qtelevision.com and tell him you're sick of it. Replace the asterisk with the "at" symbol.


 
Posted by Dustoff101 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by suzainiee:
quote:
Originally posted by King Crimson:
quote:
It's dilution via a third party, and just because Frank isn't selling the shares directly doesn't mean that it isn't a very bad thing for him to be doing.
previously posted about this back here...

Public corporations that have executed Equity Private Placements
(i.e., PIPEs and Rule 144a transactions) of at least US$1.0 million since January 1, 2001

Triangle MultiMedia Inc. [ Q Television Network ]

http://www.privateraise.com/search/issuerlist.php3?sortkey=T

--------------------------------------------------

"Based upon the findings of this certified audit, senior management and the Board of Directors will immediately meet in Las Vegas on Tuesday, November 1, 2005 to implement a financial structure to further develop the company.

Sincerely,

Frank Olsen"

.......immediately meet to implement a financial structure

.......to further develop the company.

-----------------------------------------------
Suzainiee, OUCH, more dilution...

Positive liquidity for someone who needs capital fast is nonexistant now...People will have to sell into the bid to get any money out, if they need it fast.
 
Posted by Peaser01 on :
 
.0003 is closing in I believe.

This will probably be trading under .0001 in the coming months, then a Reverse split will more than likely occur to inflate the appearance of the shareprice.
 
Posted by Zacktrade on :
 
I'm curious if it is still being manipulated badly. Level 2 still 11x6 ?
 
Posted by NextWeek on :
 
Okay I'm new to this board but old to stocks.

Here is my take on todays action:
Day(s) back someone (maybe even an insider) sees all those 9,000,000 - 9,999,900 share trades * .0004 and knowing there would be more popped in a .0006 trade yesterday pm to prime the pump. Then today they short 1 billion * .0005 and are now covering * .0004.

Net profit $100,000.
 
Posted by Dustoff101 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by NextWeek:
Okay I'm new to this board but old to stocks.

Here is my take on todays action:
Day(s) back someone (maybe even an insider) sees all those 9,000,000 - 9,999,900 share trades * .0004 and knowing there would be more popped in a .0006 trade yesterday pm to prime the pump. Then today they short 1 billion * .0005 and are now covering * .0004.

Net profit $100,000.

-------------------------------------------------
Yep, a Hedge fund sure could do it..
 
Posted by Bottomliner on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by NextWeek:
Here is my take on todays action:
Day(s) back someone (maybe even an insider) sees all those 9,000,000 - 9,999,900 share trades * .0004 and knowing there would be more popped in a .0006 trade yesterday pm to prime the pump. Then today they short 1 billion * .0005 and are now covering * .0004. Net profit $100,000.

NextWeek
Interesting theory. [Smile]
 
Posted by Peaser01 on :
 
Off shore hedge fund to be precise. Berlin, Amsterdam, etc.
 
Posted by BlackWidow on :
 
Gee, I wonder where Frank is living now that he seems to have abandoned Palm Springs for Burbank. Maybe a swanky hotel suite at the Beverly Hills Hilton, written off as "business expense" on the shareholders endless coffers. No wonder he has to increase A/S. LA lifestyle is pricey. Good thing Frank has a money machine!

Frank I think you're playing it fast and loose with our money!
 
Posted by Dustoff101 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Peaser01:
Off shore hedge fund to be precise. Berlin, Amsterdam, etc.

------------------------------------------------
Hedge funds can be USA based and still trade thru Off Shore outlets..
 
Posted by noah129 on :
 
well to be honest i dont really know whats going on but today looks like it could turn out to be the biggest volume day in qbids history.i hope this is good and not more dilution but as usual i guess the only thing left for me to do is be patient.lately we have had alot of good news and i think some big money might be entering qtv's stock(qbid) but this is just my theory. best of luck to you all this kind of volume is sure to set off some alarms though in micropennyland hehe.
20 million long and strong.

sincerely your qbidiot.
 
Posted by King Crimson on :
 
some folks here seem to ignore that frank has told us (in his own way) something about these deals. remember the "private equity group"?? all this mysterious financing?? studio deal where they put up the money, but "controlling interest will be with Triangle Multi Media."

remember frank referring to the 'investment bankers'?? well, these PIPEs and Rule 144a transactions are placed with investment bankers, hedge funds, VCs, and other qualified entities.

the thing that should p!ss everyone off is that frankie has shown those private equity people some kind of audited financials (share structure, revenue, debt, assets, etc)...or they wouldn't commit their capital...

...but the shareholders are still not shown the audit that supposedly was 'completed' oct 28th...
 
Posted by suzainiee on :
 
.......or buying back of shares sold at around .0012 last month..........nice profit.
 
Posted by DIGDOUGH on :
 
ENOUGH! Lets all just calm down and call our Invester Relations man and get the information we need, about things. I'm sure that i'm the only one that just gets a recording machine for messages. [Big Grin]
 
Posted by Dustoff101 on :
 
Yep, if they stretched the time to cover, nice hit.
 
Posted by imakmony2005 on :
 
DILUTION................................. THANKS FRANKIE.
 
Posted by LEO on :
 
Wow, went on a small vacation and now I'm back to find a new thread, two new (and big) PR's, huge volume on the day, and I've been dinged down to three stars! Oh well... Good news for Q though!!!! Lets go Frank!
 
Posted by Peaser01 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by DIGDOUGH:
ENOUGH! Lets all just calm down and call our Invester Relations man and get the information we need, about things. I'm sure that i'm the only one that just gets a recording machine for messages. [Big Grin]

You might not even get an honest answer from the machine? Well, it sure isn't a straight answer, that's for sure. [Big Grin]
 
Posted by Jonas Inv. on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by imakmony2005:
DILUTION................................. THANKS FRANKIE.

[Smile] hahaha sorry guys, I'm just back from work and I saw the volume , it makes me lauch [Big Grin] .
 
Posted by Dustoff101 on :
 
LEO, what's good about the stock being down 33.33% today.! LOL
 
Posted by CashCowMoo on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Peaser01:
quote:
Originally posted by DIGDOUGH:
ENOUGH! Lets all just calm down and call our Invester Relations man and get the information we need, about things. I'm sure that i'm the only one that just gets a recording machine for messages. [Big Grin]

You might not even get an honest answer from the machine? Well, it sure isn't a straight answer, that's for sure. [Big Grin]
it sure isnt a STRAIGHT answer..LOL
 
Posted by Jonas Inv. on :
 
one day you'll admit that I was right about the things that I sad, yeah I sold with a lose some weaks ago, many of you werer suprissed that I did that, now you wish you did it to then
 
Posted by Maestro232 on :
 
this would make a nice gift, don't you think?

http://www.scripophily.net/trianmullimi.html
 
Posted by LEO on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Dustoff101:
LEO, what's good about the stock being down 33.33% today.! LOL

True that Dust!
 
Posted by Jonas Inv. on :
 
you saw the best news so far yesterday..and still going down... yesterday some were almost thazt sure it was gonna uptick... it didn't
 
Posted by LEO on :
 
Hey, my star is back. THANKS!!
 
Posted by Dustoff101 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Peaser01:
quote:
Originally posted by DIGDOUGH:
ENOUGH! Lets all just calm down and call our Invester Relations man and get the information we need, about things. I'm sure that i'm the only one that just gets a recording machine for messages. [Big Grin]

-------------------------------------------------


You might not even get an honest answer from the machine? Well, it sure isn't a straight answer, that's for sure. [Big Grin]

-------------------------------------------------
Well peaser, ya sure do have a grasp on the humor in this situation! kIdO!. LOL
 
Posted by Zacktrade on :
 
level 2 please :-)
 
Posted by Bottomliner on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by LEO:
Hey, my star is back. THANKS!!

LEO
Someone must have felt sorry for you ... [Big Grin] . (I gave you five a long time ago.)

Hey, speaking of stars: How can I change my rating of someone? Opinions change over time, and I want to change my ratings on some people. No big deal, since I don't care about the system, but some people seem to like stars, so I want my ratings to be accurate. Anyone know how to do it?

I've sent an email to allstocks but have not received an answer yet. This may be a faster way to get an answer.
 
Posted by firefly on :
 
http://www.planetout.com/video/
 
Posted by Bottomliner on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Bottomliner:
... Hey, speaking of stars: How can I change my rating of someone? Opinions change over time, and I want to change my ratings on some people. No big deal, since I don't care about the system, but some people seem to like stars, so I want my ratings to be accurate. Anyone know how to do it?

I've sent an email to allstocks but have not received an answer yet. This may be a faster way to get an answer.

Wow, that was fast. Just got a message back from allstocks on my stars question. Apparently, there is no way to change ratings once they are submitted. So be careful when you give out stars ... you're rating someone for life. LOL. [Big Grin]
 
Posted by noah129 on :
 
thanx for the link firefly the programming was awsome qtv is gonna be bigtime thats my opinion.
 
Posted by Clyde_Crashcup on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Jonas Inv.:
one day you'll admit that I was right about the things that I sad, yeah I sold with a lose some weaks ago, many of you werer suprissed that I did that, now you wish you did it to then

OK, you're right. Now what.
 
Posted by MillerTIME on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Zacktrade:
level 2 please :-)

not much change....

.0004x.0005
11x5

Volume = 1.455B
 
Posted by Dustoff101 on :
 
Bottomliner, the star system sucks..

People use it to gang up on people to one star um..

Or gang up and give 5 stars to the unworthy..
 
Posted by Clyde_Crashcup on :
 
How about everyone one tell Jonas he was right so he will feel better about himself. Kind of an ego boost to get him out of the gutter.
 
Posted by DIGDOUGH on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Jonas Inv.:
quote:
Originally posted by imakmony2005:
DILUTION................................. THANKS FRANKIE.

[Smile] hahaha sorry guys, I'm just back from work and I saw the volume , it makes me lauch [Big Grin] .
hey watch your language.
 
Posted by Maestro232 on :
 
Actually, when people give me five stars, it's because I deserve it. Hint, Hint. [Wink]
 
Posted by noah129 on :
 
hey firefly i just gave you five*****'s thanx again for the link thats the first time i really looked at some of qtv's programming i loved it.not necessarily applicable for me but i can see how glbt folks would go nuts over this type of programming.folks this is a new millenium there is a ton of people in this world that are gay/lesbian bisexual or transexual and this type of programming is gonna be in high demand.i dont watch alot of tv but tons of people do and if anyone has looked whats on cable these days there isnt alot of programming that would be of interest to glbt folks.qtv is gonna be a hot commodity one day and ill be laughing my *ss off when im in vegas partying with my fellow longs.i dont care if frank is diluting cuz the bottomline is qtv is already a huge success and given the amount of time i beleive in frank and his dream and i beleive that he will do the longs right one day. i may be a qbidiot but time will tell whether we really were idiots to invest in this dream or we actually got in on the ground floor of a huge tv network in the making. im gonna stick to this gamble as all i really have is time anyway.
 
Posted by Dustoff101 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Maestro232:
Actually, when people give me five stars, it's because I deserve it. Hint, Hint. [Wink]

-------------------------------------------------
Thats the way to get um,,,beg!!LMAO
 
Posted by DIGDOUGH on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by LEO:
Hey, my star is back. THANKS!!

Ya we had somebody stealing stars in here the other day. Ran out before we could catch it.
 
Posted by noah129 on :
 
jonas u were right i wish i would have dumped my shares and bought back lower but it is fear that keeps me hanging on i beleive so much in qtv that i am terrified to try and swing any of my shares in the slight chance that it takes off the moment i decide to get out for a moment. best of luck to you.

sincerely your qbidiot.

p.s. qbidians when we meet in vegas you'll know who is noah when i show up to the table in a bright pink shirt that says "qbidiot"
 
Posted by Innovator on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by noah129:
hey firefly i just gave you five*****'s thanx again for the link thats the first time i really looked at some of qtv's programming i loved it.not necessarily applicable for me but i can see how glbt folks would go nuts over this type of programming.folks this is a new millenium there is a ton of people in this world that are gay/lesbian bisexual or transexual and this type of programming is gonna be in high demand.i dont watch alot of tv but tons of people do and if anyone has looked whats on cable these days there isnt alot of programming that would be of interest to glbt folks.qtv is gonna be a hot commodity one day and ill be laughing my *ss off when im in vegas partying with my fellow longs.i dont care if frank is diluting cuz the bottomline is qtv is already a huge success and given the amount of time i beleive in frank and his dream and i beleive that he will do the longs right one day. i may be a qbidiot but time will tell whether we really were idiots to invest in this dream or we actually got in on the ground floor of a huge tv network in the making. im gonna stick to this gamble as all i really have is time anyway.

I agree with you. I think everyone knows that the pps does not reflect the true value of the company. I can't remember the exact figures but the gay community has a very large disposable income. The more reach that QBID keeps receiving from carriers the better chance it has at tapping this market.
 
Posted by Dustoff101 on :
 
STARWARS123456789!
 
Posted by noah129 on :
 
this qbidiot wants some stars too hehehe.just joking i dont really care this is an online message board where we just share opinions and what little dd actually makes it to the boards.the star system is for fun i dont really think too many rely on it as to who to trust.or maybe they do i certainly dont make my investment descisions based on how many stars someone has.good luck to you all and lets try and be thankful that qtv is still making strides forward.franky please please please give us a good audit and buyback some of these shares.you dont honestly think your tv network is only valued at 30 million dollars do you.these shares are a bargain.time to snatch them up and retire them.
 
Posted by noah129 on :
 
folks is this gonna be the biggest volume day in history?
 
Posted by firefly on :
 
Thanks Noah, I just watched the Margraret Cho episode. I think it is funny. Q keeps rolling out.
 
Posted by Dustoff101 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Innovator:
quote:
Originally posted by noah129:
hey firefly i just gave you five*****'s thanx again for the link thats the first time i really looked at some of qtv's programming i loved it.not necessarily applicable for me but i can see how glbt folks would go nuts over this type of programming.folks this is a new millenium there is a ton of people in this world that are gay/lesbian bisexual or transexual and this type of programming is gonna be in high demand.i dont watch alot of tv but tons of people do and if anyone has looked whats on cable these days there isnt alot of programming that would be of interest to glbt folks.qtv is gonna be a hot commodity one day and ill be laughing my *ss off when im in vegas partying with my fellow longs.i dont care if frank is diluting cuz the bottomline is qtv is already a huge success and given the amount of time i beleive in frank and his dream and i beleive that he will do the longs right one day. i may be a qbidiot but time will tell whether we really were idiots to invest in this dream or we actually got in on the ground floor of a huge tv network in the making. im gonna stick to this gamble as all i really have is time anyway.

-------------------------------------------------



I agree with you. I think everyone knows that the pps does not reflect the true value of the company. I can't remember the exact figures but the gay community has a very large disposable income. The more reach that QBID keeps receiving from carriers the better chance it has at tapping this market.
-------------------------------------------------
The more this product gets out to the target community you have mentioned.

The more the PPS drops....

Figuring in the Dilution, the company also drops in market cap..
 
Posted by Peaser01 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by noah129:
jonas u were right i wish i would have dumped my shares and bought back lower but it is fear that keeps me hanging on i beleive so much in qtv that i am terrified to try and swing any of my shares in the slight chance that it takes off the moment i decide to get out for a moment. best of luck to you.

sincerely your qbidiot.

p.s. qbidians when we meet in vegas you'll know who is noah when i show up to the table in a bright pink shirt that says "qbidiot"

That's probably why when QBID share price comes down, it comes down slowly, in order for those longs to not feel so bad when it does take one tick lower. The slower it comes down, the less likely the longs are to sell, in fear of this new low being the bottom.

The bottom is still a ways away IMHO.
 
Posted by g-invest on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Penny-Trader:
G i dont know if you realised this or not but Jenn was joking when she wrote that message.

she was being sarcastic.

I do realize that, but sarcasm has a level of cynicism that is supposed to poke fun at someone else's expense (the bashers). I was simply pointing out that she failed to actually call the bashers out on things that they were wrong about.

A few things I can think of that would have been funnier would be: "Q Television's shares are seperate from QBID, Frank will sell the company without paying the shareholders!" or "QBID's license has been revoked!"

Those were both things that were always talked about by bashers but ended up not being true at all.
 
Posted by Maestro232 on :
 
huh...some loser gave me one star. That's lame.
 
Posted by Dustoff101 on :
 
WAS NOT ME, got my stars shut down!! LOL
 
Posted by LEO on :
 
Hey Maestro, I'd give you 5 but I already did a long time ago, hopefully someone else will!!
 
Posted by Dustoff101 on :
 
I got 17 1 star votes in here one time. And I POST RUNNERS!!!LMAO
 
Posted by Peaser01 on :
 
Not me either, I stated that many QBID threads ago that I don't play that game on 1 starring people for disagreeing with me Maestro. The only 1 stars I give nowadays are to MOMO pumpers that come on Allstocks.com. That's why I bear my useless stars for all to see.

The stars are only infectious to newbies who think that, 'Wow, this person must know what they're doing they have 4 or 5 stars and 10,000 posts. I guess I'll buy what they post.'

Also, I've received quite a few 5 stars, so it would take some time and many votes to knock me down under a 3.5 rating.
 
Posted by g-invest on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Bottomliner:
quote:
Originally posted by Bottomliner:
... Hey, speaking of stars: How can I change my rating of someone? Opinions change over time, and I want to change my ratings on some people. No big deal, since I don't care about the system, but some people seem to like stars, so I want my ratings to be accurate. Anyone know how to do it?

I've sent an email to allstocks but have not received an answer yet. This may be a faster way to get an answer.

Wow, that was fast. Just got a message back from allstocks on my stars question. Apparently, there is no way to change ratings once they are submitted. So be careful when you give out stars ... you're rating someone for life. LOL. [Big Grin]
I think you can just rate them again and it will change them. I believe I was able to do this, at least before.
 
Posted by DIGDOUGH on :
 
I noticed on planetout videos that they could really use some improvement. The On q live one I can hardly see what the people look like. How about that Frank. Can you put that on your agenda. Better reception! Doesn't seem to set a good example for a reason to subscribe when a person can hardly see the stuff.
Damn do I have to do everything around here. [Roll Eyes]
 
Posted by g-invest on :
 
Bottomliner, I think that if you set yourself to unrated, it might remove rating functionality (IE, you can't rate someone else)

Though I'm not sure on that.
 
Posted by Dew-it on :
 
vol 1.52B
10X.0005
5X.0004
 
Posted by imakmony2005 on :
 
FRANK can have my stars do something about this company ,screw the stars there for the night time.
 
Posted by Dustoff101 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by imakmony2005:
FRANK can have my stars do something about this company ,screw the stars there for the night time.

-------------------------------------------------
Damn man, your on a roll, that was really funny!
 
Posted by kywee on :
 
lol* the volume and no price movement. i cant wait for the day when i dont see a qbid thread on the main page. lol at the lemmings
 
Posted by Dustoff101 on :
 
1,529,575,069 shrs traded..
0.0005's going through again..
Today stock down 16.67% at 0.0005
Down 33.33% when it trades at 0.0004
 
Posted by imakmony2005 on :
 
Maybe EOD old frankie boy might throw us a bone and buy 1 million at .0006. then we can have a great close.
 
Posted by imakmony2005 on :
 
God knows hes got the cash.And so do i MY cash frankie!!
 
Posted by Clyde_Crashcup on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by kywee:
lol* the volume and no price movement. i cant wait for the day when i dont see a qbid thread on the main page. lol at the lemmings

Good to see you can laugh at yourself.
 
Posted by Dustoff101 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by domnic:
the last time qbid bought back, they completed it on the last day w/ a flurry...running the price up to .0068 or somethin...

today opens w/ a frenzy...calms down...interested to see how noon and the end of the day go...

w/ this volume the offer's are either mm's shorting to hold the stock down and maintain their profits or the company. if it's the mm's then you'll never see this stock rise above .0006 again barring a reverse split or name/cusip/venue change.

if it's the company...then why? why now?

...and so who are the buyer's? if the mm's are selling on the offer then their doing everything they can to maintain price...but w/ that kind of bidding you'd have to believe they'd pull back a bit to sell at a better price of .0006 so I'm leaning away from this idea.

because i'm leaning away from the mm's being the sellers then I'm leaning towards the company being the sellers. The buyer's must then be the mm's or investors...

so much speculation...it'd be neat to be right w/ my last post...but there's probably more to it than this...who knows

-------------------------------------------------
Knowledgable poster here folks, and a welcome addition to allstocks..

Lets hope he lets us pick his brain a bit if we get stuck on something!LOL
 
Posted by noah129 on :
 
well its official it is the biggest volume we have had in one year and i expect it to be the biggest volume in qbids history by the close of today.not sure what to make of this all but lets hope for an uptick at the close ehhee.
 
Posted by Peaser01 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by imakmony2005:
Maybe EOD old frankie boy might throw us a bone and buy 1 million at .0006. then we can have a great close.

lol, why would he waste his own money buying overpriced stock? Especially since he bought his at .0001 or below.
 
Posted by Peaser01 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by noah129:
well its official it is the biggest volume we have had in one year and i expect it to be the biggest volume in qbids history by the close of today.not sure what to make of this all but lets hope for an uptick at the close ehhee.

Another sacrificial lamb at the close buying above the ask to artificially inflate the share price?
 
Posted by MillerTIME on :
 
PlanetOut to Distribute QTN Fare

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

By David Cohen 11/22/2005 3:35:00 PMPlanetOut Inc. will distribute original programming from Q Television Network under terms of a deal announced Tuesday.

PlanetOut Video is a broadband entertainment service targeting the LGBT (lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender) community, and QTN is a full-time cable network aimed at the same audience.

PlanetOut Video launched in September on Gay.com (www.gay.com) and PlanetOut.com (www.planetout.com), which have a combined monthly reach of more than 5 million unique visitors.

QTN will supply highlights of its original programming, including: Brunch, On Q Live, Queer Edge with Jack E. Jett, The Reichen Show, Q on the Move, On Topic, Xcess/Access and QTN World News.

“PlanetOut has been a pioneering force in our community," QTN executive vice president Alexis Fish said in a prepared statement. “The success of their Internet presence has helped to pave the way for today's queer networks by showing us how positively the LGBT audience has responded to information and discussions of topics that affect our lives. We are delighted at the opportunity to distribute our exciting QTN programming on the PlanetOut network.”

In other QTN news, the network Tuesday announced an affiliate agreement with Selectv, which will become the exclusive satellite provider of QTN programming throughout Australia and New Zealand.

The Selectv deal will bring QTN to some 10 million households in those two countries, the network said.

“Our programming will fill a definite void in Australia, where the GLBT audience is just as vocal and involved as it is in the States,” QTN VP of affiliate sales and marketing Carol Hinnant said in a prepared statement.

http://www.multichannel.com/article/CA6286210.html?display=Breaking+News&referral=SUPP&nid=2...
 
Posted by Dew-it on :
 
I think I figured out who has been doing all the buying today. It must be Urban Casavant... I think that Urbie is taking all that money he made from the 700 Billion shares he issued for CMKX and the money scammed from the CMKX'ers and is investing it into QBID. I think Urbie thinks that QBID is his diamond in the rough. LOL!
 
Posted by MillerTIME on :
 
Posted by: zeus1
In reply to: None Date:11/23/2005 1:10:52 PM
Post #of 190192

staythemovie.com just advertised on QTN. Not sure what company advertised it. skunks do you know. It looks like a good movie called Stay
 
Posted by Peaser01 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Dew-it:
I think I figured out who has been doing all the buying today. It must be Urban Casavant... I think that Urbie is taking all that money he made from the 700 Billion shares he issued for CMKX and the money scammed from the CMKX'ers and is investing it into QBID. I think Urbie thinks that QBID is his diamond in the rough. LOL!

ROFLMAO!
 
Posted by noah129 on :
 
thats funny dew-it! you might be onto something.
 
Posted by imakmony2005 on :
 
No bones PEASER01.FORGOT FRANKS PPS.
 
Posted by imakmony2005 on :
 
Frank my butt hurts.stop frank no.IMHO
 
Posted by noah129 on :
 
second highest volume day ever as of right now.
 
Posted by imakmony2005 on :
 
That and .0004 still wont get you a cup of joe.
 
Posted by holmes on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Dew-it:
I think I figured out who has been doing all the buying today. It must be Urban Casavant... I think that Urbie is taking all that money he made from the 700 Billion shares he issued for CMKX and the money scammed from the CMKX'ers and is investing it into QBID. I think Urbie thinks that QBID is his diamond in the rough. LOL!

Mabey the MM's are christians. Haha
 
Posted by Peaser01 on :
 
Who was it that mentioned that QBID would need volume like today for it to move up? Umm, I don't see it moving up on the volume.
 
Posted by Dew-it on :
 
there must be a boat-load more shares in the float then was originally thought (an the 10B increas in A/S) doesn't help. The PPS has not budged at all with 1.5B!. If today is any indication, we probably need (IMO) 10 - 15 strait days at this volume and buy to sell ratio for the PPS to budge.


quote:
Originally posted by Peaser01:
Who was it that mentioned that QBID would need volume like today for it to move up? Umm, I don't see it moving up on the volume.


 
Posted by kywee on :
 
sorry clyde, i would be laughing if i was in this. i mean the audit is coming isnt it? it was coming in july haha
 
Posted by kywee on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Peaser01:
Who was it that mentioned that QBID would need volume like today for it to move up? Umm, I don't see it moving up on the volume.

sums it up
 
Posted by a4realguy on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Peaser01:
Who was it that mentioned that QBID would need volume like today for it to move up? Umm, I don't see it moving up on the volume.

http://www.sec.gov/rules/concept/s72499/klaser1.txt
 
Posted by Dew-it on :
 
Vol 1.58B
10X.0004
3X.0005
 
Posted by Monopoly Money on :
 
WOW, i skip out the board for 32 hours and its 20 pages later. I just caught up somewhat barring the side discussions and banning war.

First of all, an international carrier, no matter how small, is big news. It makes sense why he bought that station in Lousianna, and Katria gave Frank the perfect time to buy it cheap.

The company in Melbourne is significant because i believe it holds 4+ million poeple, (Population: 3 283 000 (1996 Census), which is roughly speaking 1/5 the countries population, and not to mention its one of the closets points to new zealand (4,109,916),and do not discount the island just south of Melbourne which is Tasmania (482,128). Keep in mind the sat company is barely younger then Qbid is. If they can get everything going just in that general area of Earth they have the potiential to reach, what? 25,000,000 people and qbid is on those airwaves.

Now take into further account that Sigapore bounces a signal in that area as well. So we potientailly have a gate way to ASIA from Melbourne, which really wouldent be bad since there is this small country to the east of Singapore called China that holds a minute population of 1/5 of the world. So it might have some small affect on QTV's revenue. I see this as the very first step in reaching a global empire. Which if you think about it for being such a relatively young broadcasting company, thats pretty awesome.

As far as the pps goes. Who bought this stock thinking you could turn a profit next week. If you said yes, then you have not done any DD at all nor have you read the past (at least) 10 qbid threads, nor have you listen to any conference calls (which are posted and could be reposted again if requested), nor have you looked at any of the PR's. Qbid is a LONG term Company. Thats what it was from the start (when i invested a year ago) and thats what it still is. Once they become fully reporting, and they have a global signal reaching a potiential of billions of homes, and the PPS is still low then yeah you can kick,hollar, and scream. As a matter of fact ill be on that bus ride with B/L and were going to personally lynch frank. HOWEVER!!!! until the day comes where we have all this, why are you worried.

If your looking to daytrade, go somewhere else. If your looking for a longterm investment then this is it. If your definition of long term is less then a year, then go somewhere else. Otherwise, to everyone screaming yelling and complaing. How are you helping the pps and the company yelling at me, as if i affect the pps in some way. The way some of you people posts its as if its *MY* fault (or anyone elses here for that matter) that you bought this stock and its *MY* fault (again or anyone elses here) that the PPS has not risen to your acceptable levels.

My advice, if you do not like this stock then you have 2 choices. Sell or Hold, complaining about it does you no good, unless you just like to anger people and bring negativity to others, in which case, go yell at the wall, at least it will be more construtive.

BAH!!!
and WOOPIE!!!! what phrase did i use when NAT'L carriage was first announce as a positility? OH YEAH took me awhile to remember but here it is. Qbig with Internaitional carrige. GIVES YOU WINGS!!!!!
 
Posted by Bottomliner on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by g-invest:
quote:
Originally posted by Bottomliner:
...Just got a message back from allstocks on my stars question. Apparently, there is no way to change ratings once they are submitted. So be careful when you give out stars ... you're rating someone for life. LOL. [Big Grin]

I think you can just rate them again and it will change them. I believe I was able to do this, at least before.
g-invest
Thanks for the info. I'll let allstocks know they are wrong. [Big Grin]
 
Posted by Jonas Inv. on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Peaser01:
Who was it that mentioned that QBID would need volume like today for it to move up? Umm, I don't see it moving up on the volume.

Me... if it were buys, and with nice PR. but not this kind of volume, rather 3-4 billion
 
Posted by MillerTIME on :
 
Can i get all the people to respond to this message and just say I if you think the reason we are not moving today is because of the OS.

Please just respond, cause i have seen many people say this comment. Even respond if you think it may be because of it...

Just wondering and then i will direct my lesson towards you guys. Nothing bad, just wanted to get a hold on how many. thanks
 
Posted by Jonas Inv. on :
 
Why would you even think that Frank would buy back shares if this would hit 0.0001? did he buy back shares the year before when it was also at 0.0001? the answer is no!!!
 
Posted by a4realguy on :
 
It's not moving because there still is no concrete financial information regarding this company / stock. IMO.... The audit will be released "in the coming weeks"... how many are we going on now.... 3?
 
Posted by kywee on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by a4realguy:
It's not moving because there still is no concrete financial information regarding this company / stock. IMO.... The audit will be released "in the coming weeks"... how many are we going on now.... 3?

people were saying that in july when i first came to this board...think ya gotta tack on more then 3
 
Posted by imakmony2005 on :
 
Looks like some MMs are going home early.
 
Posted by Jonas Inv. on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by MillerTIME:
Can i get all the people to respond to this message and just say I if you think the reason we are not moving today is because of the OS.

Please just respond, cause i have seen many people say this comment. Even respond if you think it may be because of it...

Just wondering and then i will direct my lesson towards you guys. Nothing bad, just wanted to get a hold on how many. thanks

I'll give you an example look for PRRM, go and see how much the O/S is, see the volumes in the past and see were it is now.
 
Posted by noah129 on :
 
millertime i honestly have no idea why we are not moving i suspect it is the market makers keeping this low or maybe the continued realesal of restricted shares but i am very bullish on qtv right now.anytime you get alot of people bashing and hating a stock it means to me that you are near the bottom.i thought that .001 was the bottom and im obviously wrong but lately it sure looks like .0004 is it.i could easily be wrong as i am wrong alot but if i am right then it is just a matter of time like our qbidian whizard used to say. im a patient guy i know this is a long hold and i am just upset at myself for not spreading out my buys further.i never expected to accumulate even a tenth of the shares i currently have so i am very happy with my share size.i only wish that i have the courage and conviction to maintain a large core position for the long term.best of luck tommorrow and coming weeks should be interesting.someone is loading up that is for sure.this volume is huge i have no explaination for it.maybe its a bigtime gay oil executive buying up shares hehehe.
 
Posted by Bottomliner on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by g-invest:
Bottomliner, I think that if you set yourself to unrated, it might remove rating functionality (IE, you can't rate someone else)

Though I'm not sure on that.

g-invest
Thanks for trying to help, but sorry, wrong again. I rate people all the time. Just cannot change my rating once I submit it. And allstocks confirmed that ratings cannot be changed.

But we've wasted enough time on star ratings, and I will conclude with this: The rating system was a nice idea, but it doesn't work for many reasons. Therefore, I do not use it unless someone wants me to rate them. Being a nice guy, I try to make people happy. But I also do not rely on the system to know who's a "good guy" and who's a "bad guy". I depend on my own rating system for that. And for the record, my "good guy" list gets shorter everyday. But I've always liked quality instead of quantity, so I expect to have a great time in Vegas with some really "super-duper" people. [Big Grin]
 
Posted by imakmony2005 on :
 
Come on frank give us that token buy at .0006 EOD
 
Posted by Dew-it on :
 
MT, I dont think that is a fair question. If I assume that the O/S is 50B and the PPS is .0005 then I assume again that the value of QBID is $25M. The KEY variable IMO is that we don't know what QBID is worth and we don't really know the true O/S. We need the audit results. IMO need to know, assets, subscriptions, debt, profit/potential income and yes O/S. My 2 cents:)

quote:
Originally posted by MillerTIME:
Can i get all the people to respond to this message and just say I if you think the reason we are not moving today is because of the OS.

Please just respond, cause i have seen many people say this comment. Even respond if you think it may be because of it...

Just wondering and then i will direct my lesson towards you guys. Nothing bad, just wanted to get a hold on how many. thanks


 
Posted by Marty on :
 
I certainly do, and I just dumped 1mill.
quote:
Originally posted by MillerTIME:
Can i get all the people to respond to this message and just say I if you think the reason we are not moving today is because of the OS.

Please just respond, cause i have seen many people say this comment. Even respond if you think it may be because of it...

Just wondering and then i will direct my lesson towards you guys. Nothing bad, just wanted to get a hold on how many. thanks


 
Posted by Dew-it on :
 
Alrighty, I am outta here. I wish EVERYONE a safe and happy Thanksgiving. That includes BASHERS and PUMPERS. Let's hope Frankie boys publishes the audit this year. [Smile]
 
Posted by Bottomliner on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Dustoff101:
I got 17 1 star votes in here one time. And I POST RUNNERS!!!LMAO

Dustoff
And you should be happy with that: 17 people "cared enough" to recognize your existence. I've always believed it's better to be hated than ignored. And as you can see by many of my posts, I'm working hard NOT TO BE IGNORED. [Big Grin]
 
Posted by MillerTIME on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Dew-it:
MT, I dont think that is a fair question. If I assume that the O/S is 50B and the PPS is .0005 then I assume again that the value of QBID is $25M. The KEY variable IMO is that we don't know what QBID is worth and we don't really know the true O/S. We need the audit results. IMO need to know, assets, subscriptions, debt, profit/potential income and yes O/S. My 2 cents:)

quote:
Originally posted by MillerTIME:
Can i get all the people to respond to this message and just say I if you think the reason we are not moving today is because of the OS.

Please just respond, cause i have seen many people say this comment. Even respond if you think it may be because of it...

Just wondering and then i will direct my lesson towards you guys. Nothing bad, just wanted to get a hold on how many. thanks


dewit, i agree, no doubt that the OS is why we are down here, but when i here people point out today as why its going to take Billions of shares to move this i laugh.

The fact remains today that the MM and retail investors have no idea why anybody was buying today, there was no news, no reason to run. The last couple PR's, we had already knew about, and people scream, why arent we going up...

Well thats because we already knew about:
planetout
nyc TWC
Eureka COX
etc.

So when we do get an audit or DISH, i wouldnt be surprised to see it go up 100% on less than 300M in volume.
 
Posted by DIGDOUGH on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by MillerTIME:
Can i get all the people to respond to this message and just say I if you think the reason we are not moving today is because of the OS.

Please just respond, cause i have seen many people say this comment. Even respond if you think it may be because of it...

Just wondering and then i will direct my lesson towards you guys. Nothing bad, just wanted to get a hold on how many. thanks

MT yes Its a possibility.
 
Posted by Sam1959 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by NextWeek:
Okay I'm new to this board but old to stocks.

Here is my take on todays action:
Day(s) back someone (maybe even an insider) sees all those 9,000,000 - 9,999,900 share trades * .0004 and knowing there would be more popped in a .0006 trade yesterday pm to prime the pump. Then today they short 1 billion * .0005 and are now covering * .0004.

Net profit $100,000.

Wouldn't everyone in line with buys set for .0004 have to get filled before them? I have had a buy set at .0004 for three business days now and have not been filled yet.
 
Posted by noah129 on :
 
patience patience patience is all i got to say!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
Posted by King Crimson on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by MillerTIME:
Can i get all the people to respond to this message and just say I if you think the reason we are not moving today is because of the OS.

Please just respond, cause i have seen many people say this comment. Even respond if you think it may be because of it...

Just wondering and then i will direct my lesson towards you guys. Nothing bad, just wanted to get a hold on how many. thanks

it's not the market makers and/or all of the 'naked short' sellers who have manipulated the stock of this company.

they just played the game with the pieces provided, when they were provided to them.

it couldn't be the one's providing all those 'pieces' of stock to play the game that is manipulating the stock, now could it??

unless and until the supply (of shares onto the market) stops flowing, the pps can't do much....imho
 
Posted by Dustoff101 on :
 
Advertising dollars are drying up in the media..

Down 24% on the so-called big three networks..

Google is going to change the way the world
spends it's advertising dollars...

Look for a huge decrease accross the board in all sectors of advertising on the cable channels..

All this expansion may be for not, if the money dries up in advertising..

Specialized segment markets may have some advantage, but when google really gets rolling, the specialized segment markets will have huge drops in revenue as well.......

I really don't see a way to go, except out, for the longs..
 
Posted by MillerTIME on :
 
have a good weekend all and have a good thanksgiving. see ya back here on monday!

remember market will be open till 1pm on friday, but it will be a light volume day
 
Posted by DIGDOUGH on :
 
Happy thanksgiving MT.
 
Posted by MillerTIME on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Dustoff101:
Advertising dollars are drying up in the media..

Down 24% on the so-called big three networks..

Google is going to change the way the world
spends it's advertising dollars...

Look for a huge decrease accross the board in all sectors of advertising on the cable channels..

All this expansion may be for not, if the money dries up in advertising..

Specialized segment markets may have some advantage, but when google really gets rolling, the specialized segment markets will have huge drops in revenue as well.......

I really don't see a way to go, except out, for the longs..

LMAO. thanks dusty, you really know what your talking about. Have a great thanksgiving.

And by the way, were a subscription drivin channel buddy, not advertising.

About 90% subscriptions / 7% advertising / 3% other revenue streams.

So thanks for your great DD, and links for your information, but while im sure that the big 3 networks are loosin big ground to Googles online advertising structure, it does not hold much ground in here ok.

thanks though.

PS, (i dont mean to be rude. And also, honestly, is that true that the big 3 are loosing 25% of advertising to google? i find it hard to believe its because of google, but i would be interested to find that out. thanks to whatever DD you bring.)
 
Posted by Dustoff101 on :
 
MT, NEVER STATED A 25% LOSS TO GOOGLE IN THE BIG 3.

listen to what is going on in the advertising world, and read Barron's.

You can't even read correctly! ROFLMAO
 
Posted by Dustoff101 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by MillerTIME:
quote:
Originally posted by Dustoff101:
Advertising dollars are drying up in the media..

Down 24% on the so-called big three networks..

Google is going to change the way the world
spends it's advertising dollars...

Look for a huge decrease accross the board in all sectors of advertising on the cable channels..

All this expansion may be for not, if the money dries up in advertising..

Specialized segment markets may have some advantage, but when google really gets rolling, the specialized segment markets will have huge drops in revenue as well.......

I really don't see a way to go, except out, for the longs..

LMAO. thanks dusty, you really know what your talking about. Have a great thanksgiving.

And by the way, were a subscription drivin channel buddy, not advertising.

About 90% subscriptions / 7% advertising / 3% other revenue streams.

So thanks for your great DD, and links for your information, but while im sure that the big 3 networks are loosin big ground to Googles online advertising structure, it does not hold much ground in here ok.

thanks though.

PS, (i dont mean to be rude. And also, honestly, is that true that the big 3 are loosing 25% of advertising to google? i find it hard to believe its because of google, but i would be interested to find that out. thanks to whatever DD you bring.)

-------------------------------------------------
 
Posted by Dustoff101 on :
 
MT, NEVER STATED A 25% LOSS TO GOOGLE IN THE BIG 3.

listen to what is going on in the advertising world, and read Barron's.

Revenues could be further forced down in the subscription price thru competion.

You can't even read OR COPY correctly! ROFLMAO
 
Posted by MillerTIME on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Dustoff101:
MT, NEVER STATED A 25% LOSS TO GOOGLE IN THE BIG 3.

listen to what is going on in the advertising world, and read Barron's.

You can't even read correctly! ROFLMAO

lol. ok dustoff. i appreciate you bringing the DD. thats interesting, if its true. Im not going to argue about this and that, and im sure you dont want to argue either over little things.
You know what i was saying. Just wanted to show you that by you saying that it was over for QTV because advertising dollars are going down for the big 3 has virtually nothing to do with QTN.

So all i was doing was clearing up your shady comment to others who may not have realized it. I am on this board to look out for all the traders and investors who are not as experienced, so i just try to stay honest, keep the board clean, and make sure the lies are cleared up.

You obviously didnt know that QTN was a subscription channel, so i cleared that up, if you want to argue about how i cant read and am illiterate, than by all means go ahead.
 
Posted by MillerTIME on :
 
lmao, now this is funny, and interesting.

----

Posted by: zeus1
In reply to: skunksyard who wrote msg# 190211 Date:11/23/2005 4:37:09 PM
Post #of 190212

skunks, Did you see Saskia a couple of weeks ago on the show when they had a finanacial planner on erase what she had written on the board and write in big letters qbid. I thought that was interesting because I think from that they are all invested in Q
 
Posted by Dustoff101 on :
 
MT, So, your taking over as the new Boss?//// LOL
Be kind to us poor illitreated stock traders.!!!!
I'll keep you honest as well!

Eat a Turkey for me! Happy Thanksgiving..

Sometimes staying in the shade of the tree can keep a fella from getting burned.
 
Posted by MillerTIME on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Dustoff101:
MT, So, your taking over as the new Boss?//// LOL
Be kind to us poor illitreated stock traders.!!!!
I'll keep you honest as well!

Eat a Turkey for me! Happy Thanksgiving..

Sometimes staying in the shade of the tree can keep a fella from getting burned.

LOL, ya you too dustoff. Your a good guy, im just havin a little fun with ya! You have called some good runners, so ill hand ya that! Have a good night and good weekend!
And by all means, whenever i say someething that you think may be incorrect or is more to the story, then call me out on it! I like a little controversy.

(im just in the mood to argue right now cause im gettin geared up for my big fantasy football matchup this week!LOL)
 
Posted by Dustoff101 on :
 
LOL, MT, I got my Football fix last week-end

Oregon State University vs University of Oregon at Eugene, what a civil War!

UO 56
OSU 16
 
Posted by firefly on :
 
Happy Turkey Day!!!!!
 
Posted by g-invest on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by noah129:
anytime you get alot of people bashing and hating a stock it means to me that you are near the bottom.

We've been near the bottom for the last year and half now, then. Only we've continued to drop below that bottom every subsequent week or so. This is a continuing trend downward, and the reason is quite clear: dilution. The QBID stock of February 2004 had 14 billion O/S including 53% of which was owned by Frank. Now that number has tripled to 44 billion and is likely to have increased yet again to 60 billion.

I don't think we're ever going to see this stock start taking off again till the authorized share count actually DECREASES. I'm interested in how many of you here actually believe it ever will.
 
Posted by Penny-Trader on :
 
Leo i geve you 5 just now hope that helps lol

nice to have you back.. i was gone as well for 2 weeks.

maybe we should do it again lol

ROd

quote:
Originally posted by LEO:
Wow, went on a small vacation and now I'm back to find a new thread, two new (and big) PR's, huge volume on the day, and I've been dinged down to three stars! Oh well... Good news for Q though!!!! Lets go Frank!


 
Posted by Marty on :
 
An R/S has to happen now....the hope of "buybacks" is highly unlikely, considering all the "mis-information" regarding the actual A/S, O/S share counts. Volume today of over 1.5 billion, with no movement, told me to sell 1 mill I bought last week as a swing, at a slight loss. Sure, the "company" is doing great things and making progress, but to flood the market with shares, well, that's an unscrupulous pink for ya'....and a sign of financial problems....why else would a company flood the market with shares? 'Cause they're going to be profitable by 2006? Highly unlikeley....more like, they are getting as much revenue as they can, before they make a move into the "real" market(s). JMHO....GLTA and have a great holiday...
quote:
Originally posted by g-invest:
quote:
Originally posted by noah129:
anytime you get alot of people bashing and hating a stock it means to me that you are near the bottom.

We've been near the bottom for the last year and half now, then. Only we've continued to drop below that bottom every subsequent week or so. This is a continuing trend downward, and the reason is quite clear: dilution. The QBID stock of February 2004 had 14 billion O/S including 53% of which was owned by Frank. Now that number has tripled to 44 billion and is likely to have increased yet again to 60 billion.

I don't think we're ever going to see this stock start taking off again till the authorized share count actually DECREASES. I'm interested in how many of you here actually believe it ever will.


 
Posted by Marty on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Marty:
An R/S has to happen now....the hope of "buybacks" is highly unlikely, considering all the "mis-information" regarding the actual A/S, O/S share counts. Volume today of over 1.5 billion, with no movement, told me to sell 1 mill I bought last week as a swing, at a slight loss. Sure, the "company" is doing great things and making progress, but to flood the market with shares, well, that's an unscrupulous pink for ya'....and a sign of financial problems....why else would a company flood the market with shares? 'Cause they're going to be profitable by 2006? Highly unlikeley....more like, they are getting as much revenue as they can, before they make a move into the "real" market(s), (ADDED, or get bought out, new management, or go belly up). JMHO....GLTA and have a great holiday...
quote:
Originally posted by g-invest:
quote:
Originally posted by noah129:
anytime you get alot of people bashing and hating a stock it means to me that you are near the bottom.

We've been near the bottom for the last year and half now, then. Only we've continued to drop below that bottom every subsequent week or so. This is a continuing trend downward, and the reason is quite clear: dilution. The QBID stock of February 2004 had 14 billion O/S including 53% of which was owned by Frank. Now that number has tripled to 44 billion and is likely to have increased yet again to 60 billion.

I don't think we're ever going to see this stock start taking off again till the authorized share count actually DECREASES. I'm interested in how many of you here actually believe it ever will.



 
Posted by Marty on :
 
That was bizarre.....I thought I hit "edit". Oh well....sorry for the double post....
 
Posted by Marty on :
 
And Rod, hope you had a good trip [Wink]
 
Posted by g-invest on :
 
As forum posters we are required to say what we do with full faith and honesty in our words. We can be held liable if we are bashing or pumping or knowingly posting false information. Folks, we are held to a higher standard than Pink Sheet CEOs. It's time to bail out of these stocks like PLNI and QBID who have CEOs that promise audits and do not deliver. Do not stay in a dog, do not hold the bag. Get out and save what little money you do have.

This is the best advice I can offer. And unlike Pink Sheet CEOs, I say it with only the honesty and conviction a former penny stock investor can have. I highly encourage you to formulate your own message when you leave the Pink Sheet stocks for good, and post it for the others as well. There are plenty of reporting OTC BB companies out there that deserve your money more than these Pink Sheets ones that have the most dishonest and corrupt CEOs in the history of the world.
 
Posted by Marty on :
 
g,
You been drinking? (Same post as on PLNI). Well, good for you! Happy Turkey day [Wink]
 
Posted by Hammer on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by g-invest:
As forum posters we are required to say what we do with full faith and honesty in our words. We can be held liable if we are bashing or pumping or knowingly posting false information. Folks, we are held to a higher standard than Pink Sheet CEOs. It's time to bail out of these stocks like PLNI and QBID who have CEOs that promise audits and do not deliver. Do not stay in a dog, do not hold the bag. Get out and save what little money you do have.

This is the best advice I can offer. And unlike Pink Sheet CEOs, I say it with only the honesty and conviction a former penny stock investor can have. I highly encourage you to formulate your own message when you leave the Pink Sheet stocks for good, and post it for the others as well. There are plenty of reporting OTC BB companies out there that deserve your money more than these Pink Sheets ones that have the most dishonest and corrupt CEOs in the history of the world.

BUMP! BUMP! BUMP!
 
Posted by Clyde_Crashcup on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by g-invest:
quote:
Originally posted by noah129:
anytime you get alot of people bashing and hating a stock it means to me that you are near the bottom.

We've been near the bottom for the last year and half now, then. Only we've continued to drop below that bottom every subsequent week or so. This is a continuing trend downward, and the reason is quite clear: dilution. The QBID stock of February 2004 had 14 billion O/S including 53% of which was owned by Frank. Now that number has tripled to 44 billion and is likely to have increased yet again to 60 billion.

I don't think we're ever going to see this stock start taking off again till the authorized share count actually DECREASES. I'm interested in how many of you here actually believe it ever will.

I believe a R/S has to happen. I know what Frank said but, I see no other way to reduce the A/S. I would bet he's hurting for cash. Not bashing, just looking at this with common sense.
 
Posted by Dustoff101 on :
 
Q-vest is right! we are held to higher standards than the CEO of this company..LOL

Strange world when a chat room has higher standards than the CEO of a company..

Maybe all of us should run the damn thing!LOL
 
Posted by Dustoff101 on :
 
The R/S factor is poping up again, this should get interesting...
 
Posted by Dustoff101 on :
 
Why do people have to post * not bashing* when making an observation or comment..Just curious.
Is there some kind of protacol or sumpun, if you want to express yourself?
LOL

Badges? we don't need no stinking Badges!

Sierra Madrae
 
Posted by LEO on :
 
lol...Thanks Rod, I hear you about going back on vacation, plus they're never long enough...congrats on your buck by the way.


quote:
Originally posted by Penny-Trader:
Leo i geve you 5 just now hope that helps lol

nice to have you back.. i was gone as well for 2 weeks.

maybe we should do it again lol

ROd

quote:
Originally posted by LEO:

Wow, went on a small vacation and now I'm back to find a new thread, two new (and big) PR's, huge volume on the day, and I've been dinged down to three stars! Oh well... Good news for Q though!!!! Lets go Frank!




[ November 23, 2005, 21:08: Message edited by: LEO ]
 
Posted by Aylobaha Gafuleya on :
 
Dustoff101, You post here a lot. Are you a disgruntled shareholder or just really, really bored?
quote:
Originally posted by Dustoff101:
The R/S factor is poping up again, this should get interesting...


 
Posted by Penny-Trader on :
 
Well stated my friend.

i agree 100% with this one.

Rod

quote:
Originally posted by Bottomliner:
quote:
Originally posted by g-invest:
Bottomliner, I think that if you set yourself to unrated, it might remove rating functionality (IE, you can't rate someone else)

Though I'm not sure on that.

g-invest
Thanks for trying to help, but sorry, wrong again. I rate people all the time. Just cannot change my rating once I submit it. And allstocks confirmed that ratings cannot be changed.

But we've wasted enough time on star ratings, and I will conclude with this: The rating system was a nice idea, but it doesn't work for many reasons. Therefore, I do not use it unless someone wants me to rate them. Being a nice guy, I try to make people happy. But I also do not rely on the system to know who's a "good guy" and who's a "bad guy". I depend on my own rating system for that. And for the record, my "good guy" list gets shorter everyday. But I've always liked quality instead of quantity, so I expect to have a great time in Vegas with some really "super-duper" people. [Big Grin]


 
Posted by LEO on :
 
DITTO Happy Turkey day everyone!

quote:
Originally posted by Penny-Trader:
Well stated my friend.

i agree 100% with this one.

Rod

quote:


But we've wasted enough time on star ratings, and I will conclude with this: The rating system was a nice idea, but it doesn't work for many reasons. Therefore, I do not use it unless someone wants me to rate them. Being a nice guy, I try to make people happy. But I also do not rely on the system to know who's a "good guy" and who's a "bad guy". I depend on my own rating system for that. And for the record, my "good guy" list gets shorter everyday. But I've always liked quality instead of quantity, so I expect to have a great time in Vegas with some really "super-duper" people. :D

[/QB]

 
Posted by Penny-Trader on :
 
I did Marty. it was a much deserved break from everything, including the internet and the phones.

Rod

quote:
Originally posted by Marty:
And Rod, hope you had a good trip [Wink]


 
Posted by Dustoff101 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Aylobaha Gafuleya:
Dustoff101, You post here a lot. Are you a disgruntled shareholder or just really, really bored?
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Dustoff101:
The R/S factor is poping up again, this should get interesting...



-------------------------------------------------
Are you 4Art? you seem to be trailing me like he did...LMAO!
 
Posted by RiescoDiQui on :
 
I think he's kinda sweet on you dusty
 
Posted by LEO on :
 
Where the hell is that guy who is 4art??
 
Posted by RiescoDiQui on :
 
he's posting his commie crap on the off topic board right now.... I'm sure he'll be back over here as he can't earn any shares by talking politics.
 
Posted by Aylobaha Gafuleya on :
 
Haha! I thought the word 'commies' went out of style in the 70's.
 
Posted by LEO on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Aylobaha Gafuleya:
Haha! I thought the word 'commies' went out of style in the 70's.

As long as there are commies on this planet the word commies will never go out of style, although i prefer the word communist ba$tard$...
 
Posted by RiescoDiQui on :
 
I thought being a commie went out of style in the seventies.
 
Posted by LEO on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by RiescoDiQui:
I thought being a commie went out of style in the seventies.

Maybe it will next time el jeffe(de la sic) trips again...
 
Posted by Aylobaha Gafuleya on :
 
Actually, no!

In fact, Progressives (or "commies" as you so cutely call us) are actually the majority now. Haven't you seen the polls?

quote:
Originally posted by RiescoDiQui:
I thought being a commie went out of style in the seventies.


 
Posted by Aylobaha Gafuleya on :
 
So you're not a fan of the USA's trade policy with China? Muha!

quote:
Originally posted by LEO:
As long as there are commies on this planet the word commies will never go out of style, although i prefer the word communist ba$tard$...


 
Posted by LEO on :
 
Muha to you, China is about as commie as wal-mart---nice cultures if the workers could learn to like it
 
Posted by LEO on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by LEO:
Muha to you, China is about as commie as wal-mart---nice cultures if the workers could learn to like it

Anyways...back to QBID!!
 
Posted by Dustoff101 on :
 
Qld Alibabaa, sure is flying around on his out of tune used flying carpet tonight..

Now, who was it asked what happened to 4Art...

Maybe a Genie is at work!!!!LMAO
 
Posted by RiescoDiQui on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Aylobaha Gafuleya:
Actually, no!

In fact, Progressives (or "commies" as you so cutely call us) are actually the majority now. Haven't you seen the polls?

quote:
Originally posted by RiescoDiQui:
I thought being a commie went out of style in the seventies.


Not the majority in the US cupcake.
Maybe in your beloved France.
 
Posted by LEO on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Dustoff101:
Qld Alibabaa, sure is fying around on his out of tune used flying carpet tonight..

Now, who was it asked what happened to 4Art...

Maybe a Genie is at work!!!!LMAO

Qald O'Qchetta, don't ypu jkew on me...stuypi damned qustomns..
 
Posted by Aylobaha Gafuleya on :
 
A cheerful heart is good medicine.
Bible, Proverbs 17:22

quote:
Originally posted by RiescoDiQui:
Not the majority in the US cupcake.
Maybe in your beloved France.


 
Posted by HossTrader on :
 
LMAO And I thought things went off topic last night!
 
Posted by LEO on :
 
Oh Yeayyhhh!!
 
Posted by Dustoff101 on :
 
Let the good times roll, while we're killing time waiting for all the driving tomorrow..

In Alibabaa's case the carpet cleaning!LMAO
 
Posted by LEO on :
 
Dust, as a matter of being completely off topic, are you a whiskey man?
 
Posted by Dustoff101 on :
 
Yep!!!!!!!!!!!! more Whiskey, faster Horses, and slower women!
 
Posted by lilpennypincher on :
 
.
 
Posted by lilpennypincher on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Aylobaha Gafuleya:
Dustoff101, You post here a lot. Are you a disgruntled shareholder or just really, really bored?
quote:
Originally posted by Dustoff101:
The R/S factor is poping up again, this should get interesting...


Yea....Like 4 thousand of them (Posts)........LOL

Love ya' Dusty!

disgruntled, definately....disgruntled! ROFLMAO!

and Dust.......we have to always say.*not bashing*
cus' they'll come out and put a whoooopen on your arsz..............
 
Posted by BuyTex on :
 
"slower women" ????


lil, I object!

I'd prefer faster women...

on slower horses...
 
Posted by lilpennypincher on :
 
to........?

LOL, BuyTex we get slower as we age but......That's a good thing.....We take our time....and make it last!
 
Posted by Dustoff101 on :
 
Hey newsman, don't mess with me Horse and women!

And quit Bogarting that Whiskey Bottle!
 
Posted by lilpennypincher on :
 
 -
 
Posted by LEO on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Dustoff101:
Hey newsman, don't mess with me Horse and women!

And quit Bogarting that Whiskey Bottle!

Speaking of Bogarting...
 
Posted by Dustoff101 on :
 
Lil' love ya back! Happy Thanksgiving....

But please, my sides and belly still hurt from yer Pic's de utter day on Off Topics!

Somebody Pass that Jug!
 
Posted by lilpennypincher on :
 
Nite All!
 
Posted by Peaser01 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by g-invest:
As forum posters we are required to say what we do with full faith and honesty in our words. We can be held liable if we are bashing or pumping or knowingly posting false information. Folks, we are held to a higher standard than Pink Sheet CEOs. It's time to bail out of these stocks like PLNI and QBID who have CEOs that promise audits and do not deliver. Do not stay in a dog, do not hold the bag. Get out and save what little money you do have.

This is the best advice I can offer. And unlike Pink Sheet CEOs, I say it with only the honesty and conviction a former penny stock investor can have. I highly encourage you to formulate your own message when you leave the Pink Sheet stocks for good, and post it for the others as well. There are plenty of reporting OTC BB companies out there that deserve your money more than these Pink Sheets ones that have the most dishonest and corrupt CEOs in the history of the world.

The most sense I've heard all day.
 
Posted by Peaser01 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by LEO:
quote:
Originally posted by Aylobaha Gafuleya:
Haha! I thought the word 'commies' went out of style in the 70's.

As long as there are commies on this planet the word commies will never go out of style, although i prefer the word communist ba$tard$...
You've been watching too much South Park. LOL Hopefully not everyone will be singing, "Blame Canada" when .0001 comes.
 
Posted by Peaser01 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Aylobaha Gafuleya:
A cheerful heart is good medicine.
Bible, Proverbs 17:22

quote:
Originally posted by RiescoDiQui:
Not the majority in the US cupcake.
Maybe in your beloved France.


So you invest in a company that is an abomination before God and yet quote Bible verses?
 
Posted by Nicholas on :
 
Let this thing die guys, I'm sick of seeing QBID posts labeled in roman numerals

There's no really good DD on this company. It's just a bunch of people cheering on the gay community.
 
Posted by Rich735 on :
 
Bright House logo added to Q's front page!

http://www.qtelevision.com/site/
 
Posted by noah129 on :
 
happy thanxgiving to you all. lets take this day and be thankful that we have found eachother,found freinds,found comfort, found qbid hehehe. lets the games begin. we have much to be thankful for many around the world dont have as much as we do and many even in america could afford to take the chance we have by investing what we could into qbid.just the fact that we have enough to put into a micropenny stock speaks volumes. i am thankful that i have all that i do and i am thankful for all of you that make my day full of amusement and joy.i enjoy all of your posts everyday im a little bit embaressed to admit that i am actually addicted to allstocks qbid message board. i hope you all have a wonderful day eat your hearts out and enjoy. good things come to those that are patient.

20 million long and strong.

sincerely your qbidiot. [Razz]
 
Posted by NextWeek on :
 
[/QUOTE]Wouldn't everyone in line with buys set for .0004 have to get filled before them? I have had a buy set at .0004 for three business days now and have not been filled yet. [/QB][/QUOTE]

Yes one would think that BUT I was in the same situation as you with my order. Mine never got filled. I changed it to .0005 and it was filled before the screen refreshed. So, why didn't my .0005 have to wait? Hmmmm.
 
Posted by Peaser01 on :
 
More dilution.
 
Posted by noah129 on :
 
PEASER01 we are all entitled to our opinions thats what makes america so great but the truth of the matter is we dont know if franky is still diluting or not. lets hope for those that have had a painful ride down that he is actually buying back stock and not diluting anymore. just trying to be optimistic thats all.
 
Posted by sneither on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Rich735:
Bright House logo added to Q's front page!

http://www.qtelevision.com/site/

"Bright House" is my cable provider.. Here in the Tampa area.. Thanks for the info!
 
Posted by alphaone on :
 
peaser your pm is not working
i just wanted to say dusty pm me back about the what you guys said but i dont want to do it.
thats why i say this on the board cause i want the people on this board to know that i wont play your stupid games. so i say no i will not partisapate.
i just want to put my2cent in and thats all.
you guys can deny this all you want since i am making thos public on the board but i know the truth and you guys no to.
i have lurk for a long long time and i have shares to but i just want to post with no more bashing. i like to read opinions of EVERYBODYS thats all
 
Posted by Dustoff101 on :
 
alphaone, I would not drive in your condition..LOL
 
Posted by alphaone on :
 
i think pps would be 0001 by now but mm has found a way to keep at 0005 and make a profit day after day without audit.
if mm was not manipulating we would see 0001 for sure. that is only reason we stuck on 0005
frank said prefered will dry up soon so he nows when to make his move
he waits to end of dilution, bottom then buysback then will release audit.
maybe along with dish news to.
 
Posted by alphaone on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Dustoff101:
alphaone, I would not drive in your condition..LOL

no more games dusty
you was my condition and you are right i wount drive you any more you almost got me kicked off
do me a favor and dont even reply or say anthing else to me please
i just want to post
 
Posted by Peaser01 on :
 
Just cleared out my inbox. PM away alphaone.
 
Posted by alphaone on :
 
happy thanksgiving everybody and am sorry for past bashing post
hoping audit DOES come soon come on frank
we will see friday and good day evryone with all family
 
Posted by Dustoff101 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by alphaone:
quote:
Originally posted by Dustoff101:
alphaone, I would not drive in your condition..LOL

no more games dusty
you was my condition and you are right i wount drive you any more you almost got me kicked off
do me a favor and dont even reply or say anthing else to me please
i just want to post

------------------------------------------------
Slow down dude, I have never tryed to get anyone banned...That CHIT is for pansies...

Whats your trip, don't ya know the idiotic pumping is no longer tolerated..Those days are over..

BTW, I would'nt tell the adults not to post, you will only tee them off..Many of us have fought for the rights of freedom of speach...

Have a good Thanksgiving and I mean that!

Will be leaving shortly for family and hopefuly some fishing..hehe
 
Posted by alphaone on :
 
yes not tolerated anymore because we got warned that is only why
you would keep going if we wasn ot warned.

dusty this is my last post to you
no more
 
Posted by Peaser01 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by noah129:
PEASER01 we are all entitled to our opinions thats what makes america so great but the truth of the matter is we dont know if franky is still diluting or not. lets hope for those that have had a painful ride down that he is actually buying back stock and not diluting anymore. just trying to be optimistic thats all.

It might not be Frank, and then again maybe it is. It's just funny how the L2's are always filling at .0005 after it seems that a move to .0006 is coming. This is the main sign of dilution for me.

There seems to be a never ending supply of stock for sale that just replenishes non-stop at .0005.

[ November 24, 2005, 10:52: Message edited by: Peaser01 ]
 
Posted by Dustoff101 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by alphaone:
yes not tolerated anymore because we got warned that is only why
you would keep going if we wasn ot warned.

dusty this is my last post to you
no more

-------------------------------------------------
OK, alphaone, but a parting thought...

Please learn how to use your edit button...
I made the same mistake when I first began posting..

You can correct spelling and gramatical errors after you post, if your fast!

I still use a well worn dictionary, I keep it right close and handy!!!

Geezz man, some of my early posts made no sense because I did not not proof read and edit..

Made for some embarrassing moment's..

Many of us who post in here, that you consider bashers do have deep down convictions about the company and The PPS..We just want others to see a wider view of what others think about this company...Remember many investors have a problem with what Q represents, thats just the way it is, in the real world.....

Again, Happy Thanksgiving and good luck..

PS I think you are probably young and think some of us are just to old to be in touch with some of Societies changing veiws...Your probably right..

But remember, we control the majority of the investment money..LOL
 
Posted by Wangdo on :
 
First of all Happy Thanksgiving to everyone on this board.

Not sure if this has been brought up before, but with all the BS going on it's hard to keep up with the real posts.

anyway something to digest along with all the turkey and venison that will be consumed today.

If I remember correctly when Q signed the Gay Games, Q said it would unscramble the signal so it would be free to those able to get Q, am I right or wrong in this assumtion?

http://www.qtelevision.com/site/press.asp?ID=3384

Now on the latest PR addressing the SelecTV deal it says that "the network reserves the right to package and distribute for sale to other providers as a pay-per-view event."

http://www.qtelevision.com/site/press.asp?ID=3690

Am I reading to much into this? Any thoughts???
 
Posted by imakmony2005 on :
 
WANGDO,Your right but frank hasnt done half of what was said, so who knows just one more thing hanging.
 
Posted by BlackWidow on :
 
Happy Thanksgiving to all!

Too bad the biggest turkey is Frank.
 
Posted by noah129 on :
 
i just got done stuffing myself full of food thanxgiving was a success hehe. i hope we get that audit sooner than later but more importantly i hope qtv continues to expand at a phenominal rate that they have been.i remember earlier this year all we wanted was a carrier or two we now have that and more.folks lets not forget we are now INTERNATIONAL.this is a big step for qtv and its gonna continue to get better.we need for all the weak hands to be shaken out which in my opinion has been happening.franky told us that this is a long term investment and those that wait this out will be rewarded.i may be stupid but i continue to trust him that he will surprise us one day with a huge buyback completion pr.this in my mind is whats gonna get the pps moving and moving big time.the audit will be nice so that we can see what we are worth but the buyback completion will be the bigtime payout if and when he does this.it only takes a few million to buyback a chunk of qbid shares at the current pps so that is what im praying for.i hope you all had a lovely thanxgiving dinner and an enjoyable day today.i look forward to tommorrow and more good news next week.

20 million long and strong.

long live qbidians and qbidiots hahaha.
 
Posted by RiescoDiQui on :
 
Buyback completion???
LOL
So he's doing a pretty crappy job of buying shares since the AS has literally quadrupled in the last year.
LOL
Noah, you are the worst pumper of all time.
 
Posted by Bottomliner on :
 
.

[ November 24, 2005, 19:27: Message edited by: Bottomliner ]
 
Posted by Bottomliner on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Bottomliner:
quote:
Originally posted by Dustoff101:
quote:
Originally posted by Maestro232:
Actually, when people give me five stars, it's because I deserve it. Hint, Hint. [Wink]

Thats the way to get um,,,beg!!LMAO
Dusty
Sometimes begging works really well and the results justify degrading yourself (but I don't want to talk about my sex life right now). [Big Grin]


 
Posted by Bottomliner on :
 
That was educational. I posted a comment, decided to edit it, must of hit the wrong icon and ended up posting the original and an edited version, went back and was able to delete the original ... I think. I guess computers really aren't idiot-proof. And I'm proving it with all my mistakes lately. [Big Grin]
 
Posted by Bottomliner on :
 
Sam1959
You have a PM ... when you return from the holidays.
 
Posted by g-invest on :
 
Thanks, it came from the heart.

Part of me still believes that Frank has what it takes to make this company fully reporting. That's probably the biggest reason why I think it's a great idea for us to sell. To get Frank motivated to actually make things better.

Right now he has no incentive to actually release the audit, because people keep buying the stock. Same goes with PLNI and some of these other companies that do reverse-splits every 6 months to a year.

I'm not telling people they made a bad decision deciding to buy QBID stock, I'm just telling people it is time we quit rewarding fraudster CEOs who can't post (via a PR) factual data.

For christ's sake, if I were to lie and say that QBID's A/S was 80 billion, I could be SUED. But if Frank says he is going to release an audit in 60 days and misses the date, nothing happens. And worse, people keep buying the stock or stay in it.

If Frank isn't staying accountable to shareholders now, why would he be accountable to them in the future?

quote:
Originally posted by Peaser01:
quote:
Originally posted by g-invest:
As forum posters we are required to say what we do with full faith and honesty in our words. We can be held liable if we are bashing or pumping or knowingly posting false information. Folks, we are held to a higher standard than Pink Sheet CEOs. It's time to bail out of these stocks like PLNI and QBID who have CEOs that promise audits and do not deliver. Do not stay in a dog, do not hold the bag. Get out and save what little money you do have.

This is the best advice I can offer. And unlike Pink Sheet CEOs, I say it with only the honesty and conviction a former penny stock investor can have. I highly encourage you to formulate your own message when you leave the Pink Sheet stocks for good, and post it for the others as well. There are plenty of reporting OTC BB companies out there that deserve your money more than these Pink Sheets ones that have the most dishonest and corrupt CEOs in the history of the world.

The most sense I've heard all day.

 
Posted by Peaser01 on :
 
YW g. Frank may decide to buy back shares in the future, or just wait and let the company that buys Q clean up the dilution problem. Just remember it takes money to buy back shares, and with all that has been and is being purchased, the debt load keeps growing, and thus shareholders will suffer. The problem I see is that if Frank is paying for the things that he purchases with stock, then the more shares he will need to issue as the pps continues the downward spiral. Then as the price falls, he will more than likely need to compensate those previous buyers with more shares to compensate for the drop in pps. It's just kind of scary to me everytime I hear about new purchases by Q as I wonder where the funds are coming from.

The delay, or refusal to let the public in on the info for the audit could be due to the shell that they bought was in fact too dirty to clean up. Frank did give a tid bit of info on the shell being dirty, he just didn't say how dirty it really is. I only hope that an audit is truly being worked on, or has been worked on for the investor's sake.
 
Posted by holmes on :
 
Frank wont see profit in NEW YORK, NEW JERSEY AUSTRALIA for at least a month .When you first subscribe to qtn I'm guessing payment goes on your existing provider bill, which could be a month from now. How many subscribers in NEW YORK alone? Money will soon be flowing like a river. At least it will for Frank.

Hey Frank is it the comming week yet?
 
Posted by Jennifercd10 on :
 
I think that we are going to see regions coming on line every week. IMO, we are seeing the start of a crescendo of regions offering QTN. If New York is any indication of the standard promotion process for new regions, new subscribers are given the first month free. With what I’ve gleaned, and knowing that start up promotional costs are necessary, we are probably going thru a phase where our costs are higher then normal with a revenue increase delayed by 2-3 months. I would not be surprised if these costs were 2-300K dependent upon the uniqueness of the particular region.

The start-up costs are one time whereas the revenue is continuous. The day is not too far off when we will be discussing, and some demanding, dividends. Does Q pay a dividend or use the profits to invest in expansion or buy back shares? There will always be controversy on this board. I would like us to logically debate our common issues instead of bashing the others view. No one is always right nor is no one always wrong (well, except for… LOL).
 
Posted by HighSide on :
 
hey Jen
where is except for hes been silent for sometime now
 
Posted by DIGDOUGH on :
 
Are there any LAPD SWAT owning Q in the Burbank area. We need you to raid Q and get some info.

All units, share holders down.
I repeat shareholders down.
 
Posted by DIGDOUGH on :
 
Jen, all I can say to yor last post is bring it on. And lets pick up on our shareholder awareness while its happening.
 
Posted by QBID'n on :
 
Surely he'll be back...probably just waiting for Frank to return his call. [Big Grin] ...j/k DJ


Goodmorning Dig, Jenn and Highside...good to see you guys back. Hope your holiday with family and friends went well...."burp"...excuse me...cause mine did. [Big Grin]
 
Posted by imakmony2005 on :
 
wow think i can get in. hahahah.
 
Posted by Zacktrade on :
 
Level 2 anyone?
 
Posted by DIGDOUGH on :
 
Good morning. It was a good day. Wine, woman and song. Yeah!
 
Posted by DIGDOUGH on :
 
I wonder if we are the private investers that Frank keeps refering to. Everything does seem to be very hush, hush. So secretive that even we don't know about it! [Confused]
 
Posted by imakmony2005 on :
 
Hey lets get dart boards made with FRANKS PICTURE on them, now that sounds fun.
 
Posted by Clyde_Crashcup on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by g-invest:
Thanks, it came from the heart.

Part of me still believes that Frank has what it takes to make this company fully reporting. That's probably the biggest reason why I think it's a great idea for us to sell. To get Frank motivated to actually make things better.

Right now he has no incentive to actually release the audit, because people keep buying the stock. Same goes with PLNI and some of these other companies that do reverse-splits every 6 months to a year.

I'm not telling people they made a bad decision deciding to buy QBID stock, I'm just telling people it is time we quit rewarding fraudster CEOs who can't post (via a PR) factual data.

For christ's sake, if I were to lie and say that QBID's A/S was 80 billion, I could be SUED. But if Frank says he is going to release an audit in 60 days and misses the date, nothing happens. And worse, people keep buying the stock or stay in it.

If Frank isn't staying accountable to shareholders now, why would he be accountable to them in the future?

quote:
Originally posted by Peaser01:
quote:
Originally posted by g-invest:
As forum posters we are required to say what we do with full faith and honesty in our words. We can be held liable if we are bashing or pumping or knowingly posting false information. Folks, we are held to a higher standard than Pink Sheet CEOs. It's time to bail out of these stocks like PLNI and QBID who have CEOs that promise audits and do not deliver. Do not stay in a dog, do not hold the bag. Get out and save what little money you do have.

This is the best advice I can offer. And unlike Pink Sheet CEOs, I say it with only the honesty and conviction a former penny stock investor can have. I highly encourage you to formulate your own message when you leave the Pink Sheet stocks for good, and post it for the others as well. There are plenty of reporting OTC BB companies out there that deserve your money more than these Pink Sheets ones that have the most dishonest and corrupt CEOs in the history of the world.

The most sense I've heard all day.

Frank's never been acountable. So what's new. You just now figuring this out? Anyone who's been in this for a long time knows that Frank never hit's a date. Just the way he is.
 
Posted by mjm2005 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by DIGDOUGH:
Are there any LAPD SWAT owning Q in the Burbank area. We need you to raid Q and get some info.

All units, share holders down.
I repeat shareholders down.

You probably have already gotten props for that post...but nonetheless...I thought it was hilarious...one of the few I've laughed out loud to on this board... [Big Grin]
 
Posted by mjm2005 on :
 
hmmm....maybe I should design a tshirt that says-- "Thanks Franks"... and then those drama masks on the back...the happy/sad ones...so the shirt can go both ways (no pun intended)
 
Posted by Jennifercd10 on :
 
Bright House is now displayed on the home page of QTN.
 
Posted by imakmony2005 on :
 
OLD NEWS.................. AGIAN
 
Posted by imakmony2005 on :
 
WAY OFF TOPIC BUT IT IS JUST ABOUT THE SAME CHANCE OF HITTING.
 
Posted by imakmony2005 on :
 
THREAD SHOULD BE -QBID LOST IN SPACE.
 
Posted by imakmony2005 on :
 
QBID-THE GLOBAL MELT DOWN.
 
Posted by CashCowMoo on :
 
well, we get great international news and we are still stuck like chuck. part of me is saying "hey...screw it there is no audit get out and move on" then another part of me is saying "well hell man you might as well stay in if you have been in this long. you dont lose money until you sell"


anyhow here is an interesting lil chart to see....doesnt make me happy thats for sure!

http://quote.barchart.com/quote.asp?sym=qbid&code=BSTK
 
Posted by Aleks on :
 
Nuff Sed.

http://quote.barchart.com/texpert.asp?sym=QBID
 
Posted by Wangdo on :
 
Here's a little exposure that could benefit Q Australia.

http://365gay.com/Newscon05/11/112505mardi.htm
 
Posted by imakmony2005 on :
 
Did i miss something there pumping Q-SOFT NOT QBID?? I get it its still AUSTRALIA but lets just get something going here in the good old U.S.A. I dont want frank and team going to australia on my dime and if there going get me a ticket i want to surf over there agian.
 
Posted by Wangdo on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by imakmony2005:
Did i miss something there pumping Q-SOFT NOT QBID?? I get it its still AUSTRALIA but lets just get something going here in the good old U.S.A. I dont want frank and team going to australia on my dime and if there going get me a ticket i want to surf over there agian.

i'll tell you what, they can go on my dime.

exposure is exposure...Subcribers are Subscribers

word of mouth will spread the word Q Television.

Mardi Gras will be held from February 3 to March 4, 2006, and is expected to attract 750,000 people from around the world.

whats it matter where Q gets it going, as long as they keep moving forward.

i expect the next deal to be an overseas deal, it seems that the Mipcom conference is going to pay off. JMOT
 
Posted by Monopoly Money on :
 
yeah im at work at no ones posting to help keep me amused on a snail day. THAAAANKS!! guess i could dig for Q news.
BTW where did DOC go?
 
Posted by imakmony2005 on :
 
ITS QSOFT. NOT QBID, WHAT EXPOSURE?
 
Posted by kaos on :
 
hey everyone ...i am new to posting to the board but have been following the thread for a couple of weeks..my opinion my not mean much but i would say anyone who is still holding their stock in 2006 will become rich.. the numbers at this point mean nothing..i am at 3 million and will continue to buy..this stock is going to go postal and those who have it at that point will be rich..as far as those who think this is a scam. well you are allowed to speak your mind but i think you are wrong..this is going to be big...good luck to everyone......
 
Posted by imakmony2005 on :
 
I remeber when i was that sure too, now not so, just like to get out with my pants on.60 billion o/s ya money any day now.BELIVE ME I HOPE YOUR RIGHT IM IN AND HOLDING.BUT FRANK IS SELLING TO FAST IMHO.
 
Posted by Monopoly Money on :
 
Well i just visited Q's website, its not bad but i could do better, much better. While i was there i went ahead and sent a memo to the IR to inquireing about the audit, not holding my breath. Also i applied for a job, just to see what they say. Not like i'll have anything to do for the next 6 hours.

No work is great and at the same time i wish i brought my pillow.
 
Posted by kaos on :
 
well as far as frank goes...think of it this way..frank has been in this business for 35 years..this network to him is like his swan song..we might be sitting here second guessing his every move..what he has done and what he didn't do..but he is getting the job done..and a project like this can't be easy to pull all together..there is no way he is going to let this fail...theres way to much riding on this .not only for us but for him also..i am sure everyone at one time or another has just done what they had to to get the end result..and in this case..the end result will be lots of green .. [Razz]
 
Posted by Wangdo on :
 
mm you have a pm
 
Posted by noah129 on :
 
kaos welcome aboard many of us still beleive in this dream and the fact remains that if you havent sold you havent lost yet.we have major problems and major carriers so to me its still a coin flip.i continue to beleive that frank will do us longs right one day simply on the basis that i beleive in the goodness of just about anyone until they prove me wrong more than three times.basically in my book people get four to five strikes before i consider counting them out.now when it comes to frank he has had many strikes but with all the positives surrounding this company it actually looks like they might turn a profit one day.i dont know if this is next quarter or next year or in five years but if we continue to expand at the rate we have been i see no problem one day buying back shares and retireing them.i am a hopelss optimist so all that are new be careful.i am the first qbidiot and their will be many more i am sure but to those that refer to me as a pumper i can care less becuase i am.i am hopeing praying and encouraging qtv wherever i go.i tell as many people i think would be interested in subscribing and investing in it as i can.this is my qtv network and i just pray that frank lives up to his word in that he will one day reward those that stuck out this painful growing process of dilution in order to build a giant glbt network. i dont mind people calling names cuz the reality of it is that it always comes down to you hitting the buy or sell button.we can make our opinions known but if someone is to invest their hard earned money based on my opinions then they are sorta new to the markets and have much to learn.my stock market education has cost me alot and i continue to pay for my mistakes.i dont mind paying cuz if one day i am able to retire early off of my investments than that will be the day that i rejoice and say to myself it was worth all the heartache that i have been through while learning the stock market. i am a strictly high risk investor i only play stock options and micropennies so i know what kind of risk i am taking.the question to those new to qbid is do you know the risk/reward? best of luck sorry for the long winded post.

20 million long and strong!

sincerely your qbidiot.
 
Posted by Monopoly Money on :
 
back at U

quote:
Originally posted by Wangdo:
mm you have a pm


 
Posted by Jennifercd10 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by kaos:
well as far as frank goes...think of it this way..frank has been in this business for 35 years..this network to him is like his swan song..we might be sitting here second guessing his every move..what he has done and what he didn't do..but he is getting the job done..and a project like this can't be easy to pull all together..there is no way he is going to let this fail...theres way to much riding on this .not only for us but for him also..i am sure everyone at one time or another has just done what they had to to get the end result..and in this case..the end result will be lots of green .. [Razz]

I couldn't have said it better!
 
Posted by Marty on :
 
Exactly....so how can he make it succeed with 60bill A/S? Implement new management, watch them R/S the O/S, and the resticted shares don't get touched....good company, good plan, bad for initial shareholders..he has no choice, with 60bill shares A/S.....JMHO....take it or leave it....GLTA.....
quote:
Originally posted by kaos:
well as far as frank goes...think of it this way..frank has been in this business for 35 years..this network to him is like his swan song..we might be sitting here second guessing his every move..what he has done and what he didn't do..but he is getting the job done..and a project like this can't be easy to pull all together..there is no way he is going to let this fail...theres way to much riding on this .not only for us but for him also..i am sure everyone at one time or another has just done what they had to to get the end result..and in this case..the end result will be lots of green .. [Razz]


 
Posted by Monopoly Money on :
 
Remember marty the extra 15bil shares is a just in case for the (Mary Heart)x2 series. If he dosent need it then he will throw them back. This is of course assuming that the recent huge volume with no uptick (im not counting that 300 dollar buy for .0006 because its cheating) is due to him dumping those shares, or the end of the restricted shares. I'm no expert so i couldent tell ya, i can only hope Frank isnt out to screw the people helping to funding his dream. Hes already got my money, nothing more i can do but sit back and hope for the best, and maybe an occasional annonymous hate mail to Frank every now and again.


quote:
Originally posted by Marty:
Exactly....so how can he make it succeed with 60bill A/S? Implement new management, watch them R/S the O/S, and the resticted shares don't get touched....good company, good plan, bad for initial shareholders..he has no choice, with 60bill shares A/S.....JMHO....take it or leave it....GLTA.....


 
Posted by Monopoly Money on :
 
just becaues im bored, does anyone wish to disclose there arverage buying price?
 
Posted by airdoo on :
 
well i won't break even until .0016 and that's not counting the cost for trades. so in actuality i don't break even until .0018
 
Posted by Monopoly Money on :
 
your slighty ahead of me. I averaged my 50 shares down to .0019 wed. its taken me a year to get it down this low but i finally got it under .002 and looking to get sub .001 before it runs again.
*saving my money, 1 peso at a time*
 
Posted by noah129 on :
 
i break even around .0016 i wish i didnt pile in so big at .001 but i truly thought that was the all time bottom.my latest buy was another mil at.0005.if we stay low which at this point i have waited long enough i wouldnt mind picking up a few more mil at .0004-.0005.not sure if ican afford it at this point though. it seems like a long ways away from break even but then again when pennies run they run fast.qbid is capable of having a few hundred percent run even with the large a/s/o/s. if none of us are willing to sell then this thing can skyrocket on real news and a decent audit. personally i dont really plan on selling many shares until we see the .005 range and even then i will only try to swing my shares and buyback on the dips.i hope i am wrong though and we one day gap up huge leaving all the doubters in the dust.it takes guts to put alot of money into a pinky but you know what they say no guts no...........
 
Posted by airdoo on :
 
i would hold qbid for many years and not sweat the price but ameritrade has a nasty habit of charging me a fee when my account falls below $2000, even though i've given them over $25k worth of trades. the problem i face now is, with every tick qbid falls i lose $289.00. but that problem becomes a blessing when it ticks north because then i make $289.00 for each tick. sorry if this sounds like i'm rambling but i'm on the phone with some customer service people and having trouble concentrating
 
Posted by noah129 on :
 
so airdoo i take it you have around 2.8 million shares. if it makes you feel any better every tick down for me is a 2000$ loss.that is if i were to sell.the bright side i keep trying to convince myself is if we ever get to a penny every penny up is 200,000$ in the green . hahahaha.

20 million long and strong.
 
Posted by Monopoly Money on :
 
ahhh yes the 20 million dollar dream.
the 20 million dollar question is, will it take form?

quote:
Originally posted by noah129:
so airdoo i take it you have around 2.8 million shares. if it makes you feel any better every tick down for me is a 2000$ loss.that is if i were to sell.the bright side i keep trying to convince myself is if we ever get to a penny every penny up is 200,000$ in the green . hahahaha.

20 million long and strong.


 
Posted by RNINALVNG on :
 
Noah...you remain an overall positive person/poster...but as Firefly asked you 2 weeks ago...for the love of god...PPPPLLLLLEEEEAAASSSEEE quit posting in 30 to 40 sentence "1" paragraph posts. Show the board and us longs the respect you would want. Break it into normal paragraph structure. It's not too much to ask...or expect.
 
Posted by airdoo on :
 
yeah that really sucks!!! but if it goes up that really rocks!!! haha. good luck. u gotta have nerves of steel man!!! then again Jennifercd must have nerves of something i've never heard of. lol.
 
Posted by Monopoly Money on :
 
Good lord id love to watch that account, every uptick is 26,400 dollars. Holy crap that would be so much fun to watch. Now thats the 264 million dollar dream right there and i hope it comes true [Smile] , because if it does then ill get my share as well [Big Grin]


quote:
Originally posted by airdoo:
yeah that really sucks!!! but if it goes up that really rocks!!! haha. good luck. u gotta have nerves of steel man!!! then again Jennifercd must have nerves of something i've never heard of. lol.


 
Posted by noah129 on :
 

 
Posted by Monopoly Money on :
 
thanks for messing the page up to prove your point [Frown]
 
Posted by noah129 on :
 
ok that was childish and obnoxious sorry but i can understand that its a bit annoying to read someones posts that are not spaced out but if you dont like the way i write i suggest you simply everytime you see noah129 on your left just go right on past my posts.hows that for a run on sentence.wow im cynical obnoxious annoying and plain out disrespectful tonight i guess i am getting a little impatient.the main lesson all can learn who are long on qbid is patience.we will see if that old saying is true patience pays.good luck to you all.

sincerely noah.
 
Posted by noah129 on :
 
sorry mm i hope that fixes it i dont want people to know me as an a hole so lets hope not too many read that post before i edited it.
 
Posted by Monopoly Money on :
 
thats fine, i just thought you kinda went overboard with proving your point, but hey thats what forums are about sometimes right [Smile] . Thanks for fixing it i apprecaite it

[ November 25, 2005, 22:18: Message edited by: Monopoly Money ]
 
Posted by noah129 on :
 
no prob monopoly money lets all have a restful peaceful weekend and continue to watch our little q grow each day. best of luck to you all.
and a happy holidays to you all as well.
i want my qtv , and i want some cheesecake too.

sincerely your qbidiot.
 
Posted by DIGDOUGH on :
 
Wall Street Tunes into Q Television Network
Thursday June 3, 6:00 am ET
Successful Industry Launch Generates Interest from Carriers, Advertisers and Investment Leaders

PALM SPRINGS, Fla.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--June 3, 2004--Q Television Network (Pink Sheets: QBID - News) announces details surrounding the results of its industry launch, which began June 1.

Within the first day of the network's availability on Intelsat America's 7, 129 degrees West, Channel 1, Q Television received considerable response from potential carriers and advertisers seeking more information regarding the network and its anticipated public launch.

As a result, network executives will travel to New York City June 6 - 11 to meet with private equity funds, hedge funds and securities dealers. All of these firms have indicated a strong interest in the upcoming launch and the opportunity for equity participation.

In addition, the executives also have appointments scheduled with cable companies and advertisers to present the current direction of Q Television Network.

"We anticipated that the soft launch would generate lots of inquiries regarding the availability of Q Television for carriage and advertising," notes president Frank Olsen. "Yet we were amazed how quickly everything has moved forward within the past 24 hours."

The network expects to announce major contracts within the coming weeks.
About Q Television Network

This television network was organized to create and develop a network devoted to providing television programming for the gay and lesbian community. While the company expects much of its subscriber base to be comprised of members of the gay and lesbian population, management also believes that quality programming about the gay and lesbian experience, designed to entertain, educate and inform, will attract many other segments of the viewing public. The company's programming will be available on a subscription basis to those desiring its programming. The network will broadcast 24 hours per day, 7 days per week. Providing distribution via satellite ensures availability of the network across the United States, including Alaska, Hawaii and Puerto Rico.

Safe Harbor Statement

As a cautionary note to investors, certain matters discussed in this press release may be forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such matters involve risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ materially, including the following: changes in economic conditions; general competitive factors; the television network's ability to execute its business model and strategic plans; and the risks described from time to time in the company's Securities and Exchange Commission filings.

For more information regarding carriage and advertising opportunities, contact the network at 760-323-4455.

Notice the above remark about coming weeks. Sound familiar?
 
Posted by polo1110 on :
 
Noah, no offense, as I have nothing against you, but your posts are annoying. I used to try and read them, but I haven't read any for about 2 months now, until the one that tells people to skip your posts if they don't like your format.

Someone asked you to show this board the respect that you expect from others. Why is that offensive to you?

Why do you feel the need to tell everyone who doesn't like your posts to f*** off?

Even davidjanas spaced out each sentence with a ...

Think about it this way. If you stop posting 1000 word sentences, then maybe more people will read what you have to say and respond to you. Isn't that why you post on here in the first place...to initiate conversation?

Just a suggestion...
 
Posted by mjm2005 on :
 
QTN highlights go online via PlanetOut

PlanetOut and Q Television Network (QTN), two of the US's leading media companies serving lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender audiences, have partnered to offer the latter's programming online.

Original shows produced for QTN are being added to PlanetOut Video, the broadband portal operated by the same company behind the website Gay.com, which has localised versions around the world.

PlanetOut already has broadband distribution agreements in place with Here!TV and Sundance Channel.

[fm 05 singer] The inclusion of QTN will bring highlights from programmes including morning talk show Brunch and fashion news and entertainment show Xcess/Access, both starring Queer Eye for the Straight Girl's Honey Labrador. QTN World News and The Reichen Show, a talk show hosted by The Amazing Race winner Reichen Lehmkuhl, will also feature.

"We are delighted at the opportunity to distribute our exciting QTN programming on the PlanetOut network, said QTN executive VP Alexis Fish. PlanetOut president Mark Elderkin said QTN's content was "sure to be a hit" with the company's online audience.

Jonathan Webdale
24 Nov 2005
© C21 Media 2005

http://www.c21media.net/news/detail.asp?area=89&article=27696
 
Posted by mjm2005 on :
 
www.clickz.com/news/article.php/3566166

PlanetOut to Distribute Q Television Video
By Pamela Parker
November 22, 2005

Gay and lesbian media company PlanetOut Inc. will distribute highlights of video from the Q Television (QTN) satellite network, under the terms of a deal announced today.

Financial terms of the agreement weren't disclosed, but Mark Elderkin, president of PlanetOut, told ClickZ, "The value for our company is quality content that we can sell advertising against. The value for the producer is distribution and access to an audience they could otherwise not reach."

The deal will give PlanetOut more video inventory on its PlanetOut Video broadband service, which launched in September. The company offers :15 pre-roll spots and sponsorships of its video content. Ads can be targeted by content, by gender, by age, by location, and using behavioral criteria.

Elderkin says the company has sold mostly in-banner video ads thus far, but it's ramping up its in-stream inventory to meet demand from advertisers.

"For 2006, as we book new business for next year, we're seeing more and more requests from the agencies we work with to include that [video]," he said. "We're doing all we can to grow our video archives."

The QTN video will consist of five- to 15-minute highlights from news, talk and variety shows, including a morning talk show called "Brunch;" the celebrity entertainment talk show "On Q Live;" and "QTN World News."

PlanetOut also distributes video clips from here!TV and Sundance Channel. It's considering developing original video in-house and Webcasting user-generated content.

"We don't produce anything in-house today but it's something we're evaluating," Elderkin said.

The video initiative isn't the only move PlanetOut is making to incorporate traditional media into its portfolio of ad offerings. The company recently purchased LPI media, whose properties include print publications "The Advocate," "OUT," "The OUT Traveler," and "HIVPlus," along with their Web site counterparts.
 
Posted by mjm2005 on :
 
PlanetOut to Distribute Q Television Content Online
11.25.05

By Ross von Metzke

(San Francisco, CA) – Planet Out, the nation’s leading LGBT media and entertainment company, has partnered with Q Television to develop and deliver original programming to be distributed on PlanetOut Video.

QTN is a 24 hour a day premium television network organized to create, develop and feature television programming for the LGBT community. Its lineup includes a packed Monday-through-Friday slate of live and interactive content, plus sports, news and entertainment.

PlanetOut Video is a broadband entertainment service designed to engage online audiences with LGBT video programming aggregated from TV networks, movie studios, independent film producers and individual artists.

The service launched in September on Gay.com and PlanetOut.com, reaching an audience of more than five million people monthly.

"We plan to continue our roll-out of exclusive video content to engage our audience and to keep up with the growing demand from our advertisers for targeted and measurable online video commercials,” said Mark Elderkin, president of PlanetOut Inc. “The unique news, talk and variety shows that QTN produces are sure to be a hit with our audience.” QTN will supply highlights of its original programming, including: Brunch, a morning talk show which stars Queer Eye for the Straight Girl's Honey Labrador and former CNN producer/correspondent Scott Withers; On Q Live, a celebrity entertainment talk show; and The Reichen Show, an hour of talk, debate, education, gossip and news hosted by The Amazing Race winner Reichen Lehmkuhl.

“PlanetOut has been a pioneering force in our community,” Alexis Fish, executive vice president of Q Television Network, explained. “The success of their Internet presence has helped pave the way for today's queer networks by showing us how positively the LGBT audience has responded to information and discussions of topics that affect our lives.” In addition to QTN, PlanetOut has broadband distribution agreements with launch partners here!TV and Sundance Channel.

PlanetOut Inc. media properties include Gay.com, PlanetOut.com and Out & About Travel and recently acquired LPI Media, publishers of The Advocate, Out and Out Traveler magazines.

Q Television is telecast 24 hours per day, 7 days per week via satellite distribution across the United States, including Alaska, Hawaii and Puerto Rico.

© 2004 GayWired.com; All Rights Reserved.
--------------------------------------------------


Q stretches to Australia

US gay, lesbian, bi-sexual and transgender (GLBT) digital TV network Q Television has secured its first international distribution agreement that will make it available throughout Australia and New Zealand.

Australia's Selectv is to be the exclusive satellite provider of the channel in the region, making Q's programming available in an additional 10 million households.

[fm 05 boyd] "This is an incredibly exciting move for us," said Carol Hinnant, Q's VP, affiliate sales and marketing. "Selectv has embarked on a mission to deliver Australian audiences a rich and diverse line-up of international television fare. Our programming will fill a definite void in Australia, where the GLBT audience is just as vocal and involved as it is in the States."

Q, which airs 24 hours a day, seven days a week, currently offers five hours of live programming daily, including Brunch, Q on theMove, and Flesh and Threads.

Jo Anne Kenny
23 Nov 2005
© C21 Media 2005
 
Posted by mjm2005 on :
 
I understand that some of these news releases may be old news, but I'm posting it just in case:

1) you didn't happen to see them when they first came out

2) they are from a different news source...shows greater exposure
 
Posted by mjm2005 on :
 
ANOTHER ALEXA CHART---

 -

 -


OK...Look all the way to the right...This chart is comparing QTN to Logo's website... see where QTN overtook Logo??? And that was recently...
 
Posted by DIGDOUGH on :
 
mjm2005, thats great news. Good and many posts makes my heads hertz a lots.
 
Posted by Bottomliner on :
 
4Art
Trying to send you a PM, but you aren't receiving. [Smile]
 
Posted by imakmony2005 on :
 
Franks got his money for QBID already, if he sells at .0001 his made a mint.think about it.
 
Posted by imakmony2005 on :
 
His dream is the same as yours MONEY well frank seems to be on track now what about the share holders?
 
Posted by NextWeek on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Monopoly Money:
just becaues im bored, does anyone wish to disclose there(sp) arverage buying price?

My ABP is .0009 and going down more soon.
 
Posted by Penny-Trader on :
 
Some one earlier asked about Doc.

He is away for the weekend. I heard from him this morning and everthing is ok

We will see him back here soon

Rod
 
Posted by Sam1959 on :
 
I just sent an email to Richard Brown demanding that I be provided a copy of the audit or that they make it public. I'll let you all know if I get a reply.
 
Posted by HighSide on :
 
i think ill email Richard as well but ill request it in a calm manner,

well try the good cop bad cop rutine and see if it works LOL
 
Posted by HighSide on :
 
just sent email to the organization called Q

and will be waiting for there reply for what ever imfo they can give me on Audit
 
Posted by imakmony2005 on :
 
TRY THE AUDIT WILL BE OUT START OF 2006 ARE SOMEWHERE CLOSES,NOW THAT JUST BOUGHT THEM A FEW MORE MONTHS. I FULLY BELIVE WE WILL GET SOME SORT OF BS PR NEXT WEEK LIKE THAT.
 
Posted by imakmony2005 on :
 
10,000 TO 1 R/S COMING JUMP IN THE WATER IS FINE.IMHO
 
Posted by imakmony2005 on :
 
THAT WILL PUT FRANKS BUYERS ON THE NAZ.
 
Posted by Monopoly Money on :
 
It is my suspicion that the Audit will not be released until the new year. I have reasons for this, mostly just observations but hey thats what i do best around here.

1) Will there be any real value disclosing this information during the holiday season. My thinking is, no not really. With the Xbox 2 being rioted over, and the rally to get an xmas to the hurricane victums. Now would not be a good time to try to get in new subscribers.

2) Jan 1st is the beginning of the phiscal year for Qbid * i think, its either july 1st or jan 1st, but i think its jan 1st*, and the beginning of the march to the GG06 so your going to want to start the new year off right with the middle being the pinnacle, while tring to prop up numbers until the end of the year.

3) Several weeks will put us inline with January, given Franks past track record, so my assumption is based on that.

When you sit and think about it, will it really do us or him any good to release it in december when no one is looking or closer to the GG06 when all eyes are starting to look at you and the event your sponering. I think this is whats going on in Franks mind, and if you step back and look at everything, it will actually be better for us to release is later then sooner at this point.

*warning* please dont yell at me like you did at DJ. I am only speculating, i have heard nothing nor have any facts to support this claim. Only observations that make since from a "BUSINESS" perspective. "Strike while the irons hot" if its cold, all you did was make a loud noise that people care nothing about. Strike while its hot, everyone is watching the pretty sparks fly off and a piece of art take form. Just think about it

Sorry for rambling.
 
Posted by Dustoff101 on :
 
If the reverse split comes [ which it should ] make sure you sell at the top before it starts spiraling down again..Might recoup some lost shrs when it starts down after the new high caused by the split.

But do it quick, sometimes you can be pleasantly surprised when these Pinks do the reverse split..Just remember it will have a new stock symbol, so you really gotta move!
 
Posted by firefly on :
 
2 weeks and I am out. tax. eom
 
Posted by NextWeek on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by firefly:
2 weeks and I am out. tax. eom

I'm covered on taxes for 2005 and maybe part of 2006. QBID is not a tax candidate here, I hope.

Although I'm not into penny stocks big time there are some that have yielded some very nice profits for my portfolio over the years. Still, 4 out of 7 I currently hold are under $1. but that seems to be more about having scanned some 7800 stocks using a spreadsheet back in September looking for some good buys. From that I compiled a list under a $1. (plus lists for other factors). Since it takes so much time I may not do that again for months.
 
Posted by firefly on :
 
7k loss,, will rebuy some after first of year,,unless something materializes before Jan 1st.
 
Posted by kaos on :
 
just curious..if a r/s does come ..what do you think the stock will go to before it falls again...and where do you think the stock will settle after ...
 
Posted by firefly on :
 
koas,,make your own decisions,,,wish I had a majic 8 ball,,,,glty
 
Posted by Monopoly Money on :
 
First off Frank stated he would not do a R/S "while he was in charge of the company". These are the key words. But in the eventuality that he steps down for health reasons and someone steps in and does an R/S then, to my knowledge, the price will be dictated by how large the R/S is. Once the R/S is complete it will raise slightly then fall drastically, for that is the pattern of all R/S's i have seen.

But there is no garuntee about this and i will bow down to someone more knowledgable on the subject then I.
 
Posted by Dustoff101 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by firefly:
7k loss,, will rebuy some after first of year,,unless something materializes before Jan 1st.

-------------------------------------------------
firefly, one of the things that really PO'S me about this stock is the the fact that there may be many young inexperienced people in this stock that do not understand Tax ramifications of buying and selling stocks....

Example: Some may sell in anticipation of a tax credit, only to find out they do not qualify..

This is not a situation for amateurs to be investing in....
 
Posted by LEO on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Dustoff101:
quote:
Originally posted by firefly:
7k loss,, will rebuy some after first of year,,unless something materializes before Jan 1st.

-------------------------------------------------
firefly, one of the things that really PO'S me about this stock is the the fact that there may be many young inexperienced people in this stock that do not understand Tax ramifications of buying and selling stocks....


Example: Some may sell in anticipation of a tax credit, only to find out they do not qualify..

This is not a situation for amateurs to be investing in....

Dust, where can someone go to find info on this?
 
Posted by firefly on :
 
Well said dustoff. We are still in pinky land the last I saw.
 
Posted by firefly on :
 
Suggestion is to call your cpa.
and /or your broaker.
 
Posted by imakmony2005 on :
 
Never know FLY maybe frank will pull a rabbit out of his azz.I feel sorry for the people frank is supost to be helping start something new if i was gay i would want frank out he is hurting there whole scene,IMHO.
 
Posted by firefly on :
 
Hi iamk ,, how are the waves?
If Franks leaves imo it will be a sell (qbid or TMM????) We see no financial structure so who knows. This imo is why we are at .0004
 
Posted by Dustoff101 on :
 
Leo. I use an accountant who is very savy on my various business enterprises..We have a *pick up the phone and call him* *where ever I may be* relationship, for advise on buisness matters...

I highly reccomend that folks form a retainer type relationship with a good attorney and or realestate, tax consultant..

If that is to much expense? at least make an appointment with one for financial planning your future...ASK him or her QUESTIONS!!! even if ya feel like it's a dumb one..

$50.00 on up to thousands, can be the initinial fee,,,some are free! ya just have to take the time and do it....It can really save your behind..
 
Posted by imakmony2005 on :
 
HI FLY, God this stock makes me so mad its just been so long.
 
Posted by firefly on :
 
Yes frustating,,growing pains but damn!
 
Posted by Dustoff101 on :
 
PS!! your tax man and attorney are deductible!
 
Posted by firefly on :
 
Go Dawgs [Smile]
 
Posted by firefly on :
 
Wow Didn't know that. Thanks Dust.
 
Posted by imakmony2005 on :
 
Can you SAY 60 BILLION O/S, R/S ON THE WAY.
 
Posted by firefly on :
 
Don't know,,It is Vegas time right now,,would rather play black jack than craps. Sure like to see the dealers eyes.
 
Posted by Dustoff101 on :
 
imakmoney, damn man, I almost typed in imamonkey again, it's stuck in my head!! LOL

Anywho's, Hey, we've had some really sharp glassy Peaks on some hard to get to beach breaks lately. Well over head with left and right fast drops!! Some barrel's really got the locals stoked up!
 
Posted by imakmony2005 on :
 
DUSTOFF, That sounds sooo good wish i was there, It funny like 10 people have said that to me about that imamonkey maybe i should change my name.
 
Posted by firefly on :
 
LOL, I always view it as monkey,,It's great please don't change it. Dislexia on my end. hehe
 
Posted by imakmony2005 on :
 
For you fly it stays.
 
Posted by firefly on :
 
Nice,,Thanks !!!
 
Posted by imakmony2005 on :
 
And i mean it my word is like the oak. not like are boy frank.
 
Posted by firefly on :
 
That hurt my brain. lol
 
Posted by imakmony2005 on :
 
stole it from a movie.
 
Posted by firefly on :
 
LOL
 
Posted by imakmony2005 on :
 
Stay strong. LOL
 
Posted by LEO on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Dustoff101:
Leo. I use an accountant who is very savy on my various business enterprises..We have a *pick up the phone and call him* *where ever I may be* relationship, for advise on buisness matters...

I highly reccomend that folks form a retainer type relationship with a good attorney and or realestate, tax consultant..

If that is to much expense? at least make an appointment with one for financial planning your future...ASK him or her QUESTIONS!!! even if ya feel like it's a dumb one..

$50.00 on up to thousands, can be the initinial fee,,,some are free! ya just have to take the time and do it....It can really save your behind..

Thanks Dustoff!
 
Posted by QBID'n on :
 
Just a tidbit, because I figured some may have either not heard him or forgotten....but remember, according to Frank during the last CC, the asset value and gross revenue for September and October (or proximity of), will NOT be included in the audit.

You got to admit…had Frank been able to report the new assets, the new subs count and revenue from the following events, the coming audit would have been absolutely amazing to say the least.

But regardless, everything is going to be fine. [Big Grin]

Tuesday, November 22, 2005 - AUSTRALIA’S SELECTV

Tuesday, November 22, 2005 - PlanetOut Inc.

Tuesday, November 15, 2005 - EUREKA/ARCATA, CA

Monday, November 14, 2005 - NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY

Thursday, November 10, 2005- STEVE KMETKO

Wednesday, November 09, 2005 - BIRMINGHAM, AL

Monday, November 07, 2005 - SIR ELTON JOHN

Tuesday, October 25, 2005 - SANDRA BERNHARD

Tuesday, October 25, 2005 - MIPCOM ‘05

Tuesday, October 18, 2005 - CELEBRITY CO-HOST LINEUP

Tuesday, October 11, 2005 - GAY GAMES VII AND FULL SLATE OF ORIGINAL PROGRAMMING

Tuesday, October 11, 2005 - REICHEN LEHMKUHL’S NEW SERIES

Monday, October 10, 2005 - CHICAGO

Thursday, October 06, 2005 - “ON TOPIC WITH CHRISANNE EASTWOOD”

Thursday, September 29, 2005 - FILM CONTEST INVITES GLBT FILMMAKERS

Thursday, September 29, 2005 - ROCHESTER AND SYRACUSE

Friday, September 16, 2005 - Network Teleports, Inc.

Tuesday, September 06, 2005 - “QueerEdge with Jack E. Jett” Syndication

Thursday, September 01, 2005 - STAR POWER FOR “BRUNCH”
 
Posted by imakmony2005 on :
 
MLON, SURE PUT OUT SOME GOOD PRS.LOL
 
Posted by Dustoff101 on :
 
The better the PR'S the worse the PPS, that ain't a good sign!LOL
 
Posted by Monopoly Money on :
 
Couldnet turn on your TV and see MLON anyone in the US could you? What always keeps me here is the fact that i can see and touch what QBID is doing, not hope that they are telling me the truth. I.E. diamond dust.

quote:
Originally posted by imakmony2005:
MLON, SURE PUT OUT SOME GOOD PRS.LOL


 
Posted by Dustoff101 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Monopoly Money:
Couldnet turn on your TV and see MLON anyone in the US could you? What always keeps me here is the fact that i can see and touch what QBID is doing, not hope that they are telling me the truth. I.E. diamond dust.

quote:
Originally posted by imakmony2005:
MLON, SURE PUT OUT SOME GOOD PRS.LOL


-------------------------------------------------
Excuse me, but since you are a now college student, would you edit your post so it makes sense. I have a hard tme with poor spelling, and sentance structure, unless of course it is my own.LOL

I left a little sumpin in my paragraph fer ya! LOL
 
Posted by firefly on :
 
That's funny, Have you seen Days of Thunder lately?
 
Posted by Dustoff101 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by firefly:
That's funny, Have you seen Days of Thunder lately?

-------------------------------------------------
To whom, do you speak?

If to me? never watched the flick, yet.
 
Posted by firefly on :
 
Bad mining stock. It is a great line in the movie.
 
Posted by Monopoly Money on :
 
my appologies, im at work and im pretty sick. Please forgive me if im not the best of conveying ideas at this point in time. I shall try to better display more complete thoughts in future posts, just for you.


quote:
Originally posted by Dustoff101:
quote:
Originally posted by Monopoly Money:
Couldnet turn on your TV and see MLON anyone in the US could you? What always keeps me here is the fact that i can see and touch what QBID is doing, not hope that they are telling me the truth. I.E. diamond dust.

quote:
Originally posted by imakmony2005:
MLON, SURE PUT OUT SOME GOOD PRS.LOL


-------------------------------------------------
Excuse me, but since you are a now college student, would you edit your post so it makes sense. I have a hard tme with poor spelling, and sentance structure, unless of course it is my own.LOL

I left a little sumpin in my paragraph fer ya! LOL


 
Posted by Dustoff101 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Monopoly Money:
my appologies, im at work and im pretty sick. Please forgive me if im not the best of conveying ideas at this point in time. I shall try to better display more complete thoughts in future posts, just for you.


quote:
Originally posted by Dustoff101:
quote:
Originally posted by Monopoly Money:
Couldnet turn on your TV and see MLON anyone in the US could you? What always keeps me here is the fact that i can see and touch what QBID is doing, not hope that they are telling me the truth. I.E. diamond dust.

quote:
Originally posted by imakmony2005:
MLON, SURE PUT OUT SOME GOOD PRS.LOL


-------------------------------------------------
Excuse me, but since you are a now college student, would you edit your post so it makes sense. I have a hard tme with poor spelling, and sentance structure, unless of course it is my own.LOL

I left a little sumpin in my paragraph fer ya! LOL


-------------------------------------------------
No problem, just kidding ya...

Hey, do ya know if the new Macromedia update is a virus like the one a while back...Seems to me it came in on the week-end as well, but can't be sure..It is blinking away on all my computers at the present time..Maybe some of you computer geeks know sumpin us *amatuer computer folks* don't.
 
Posted by firefly on :
 
That sux.
 
Posted by firefly on :
 
Guess it is time to anti virus sweep me. Thanks. MaCafee time.
 
Posted by Bottomliner on :
 
MM
You have a PM. [Smile]
 
Posted by firefly on :
 
sweep done 2 tojans
 
Posted by firefly on :
 
nothing unusual
 
Posted by Monopoly Money on :
 
if you had a properly setup firewall you wouldent get trojans. Oh well price you pay to be uneducated in the ways of technology [Smile]


quote:
Originally posted by firefly:
nothing unusual


 
Posted by Monopoly Money on :
 
Thanks BL appreciate the comments and look forward to future correspon******.

quote:
Originally posted by Bottomliner:
MM
You have a PM. [Smile]


 
Posted by Dustoff101 on :
 
Great, thanks....
Hey, someone is yacking away on another board about the O/S..

States:
O/S at 50,000,000,000
A/S at 60,000,000,000
 
Posted by firefly on :
 
skool? If I were more educated?
Don't be too arrogant,,It will take you far.
 
Posted by BuyTex on :
 
after following some of these "landmark cases"? If the SEC cares about its reputation, new regs should promulgate, recognizing the "distinction" between "real stocks" and pinks:

quote:
OK, you're not bound by financial {income} reporting regs, BUT, YOU SIMPLY MUST file intent to increase/decrease Authorized Shares.
Violators face tar-n-feathering--if not worse...


Bottom line? Folks gotta get involved in the process. Jeez, this affects the entire economy...
 
Posted by RiescoDiQui on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by BuyTex:
after following some of these "landmark cases"? If the SEC cares about its reputation, new regs should promulgate, recognizing the "distinction" between "real stocks" and pinks:

quote:
OK, you're not bound by financial {income} reporting regs, BUT, YOU SIMPLY MUST file intent to increase/decrease Authorized Shares.
Violators face tar-n-feathering--if not worse...


Bottom line? Folks gotta get involved in the process. Jeez, this affects the entire economy...

At some point in the future investors will become involved by starting lawsuits...
Personally I don't know anyone thinking about it... It's just logical to assume that after soooooo many people have lost sooooo much money on one stock that atleast one of them would consult a lawyer.
 
Posted by firefly on :
 
monopoly,,have you ever been in a team to start up a nuclear power plant? screw your statement about technology kid.
 
Posted by DWE on :
 
What's the deal with QBID? It has billions in volume but the PPS doesn't even move?
 
Posted by firefly on :
 
monopoly,,ever crawled in the pit of a reactor.
 
Posted by BuyTex on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by firefly:
monopoly,,have you ever been in a team to start up a nuclear power plant? screw your statement about technology kid.

lol, ff--didn't dig mono's post, either: BUT must ask about your nuke experience.

I broke the the stories about Comanche Peak's welding problems, so I have a lil background and *much* interest...
 
Posted by firefly on :
 
sweet tex I was at vogtle 4 years. 2 years statup, 1 year trip and 1 year commercial operation.
 
Posted by Dustoff101 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by BuyTex:
after following some of these "landmark cases"? If the SEC cares about its reputation, new regs should promulgate, recognizing the "distinction" between "real stocks" and pinks:

quote:
OK, you're not bound by financial {income} reporting regs, BUT, YOU SIMPLY MUST file intent to increase/decrease Authorized Shares.
Violators face tar-n-feathering--if not worse...


Bottom line? Folks gotta get involved in the process. Jeez, this affects the entire economy...

-------------------------------------------------
Hey Tex, hey ya dd'd this thing much..Yicks, what a nitemare.

firefly, sometimes when folks start coming out of the ether, they can get a bit testy.LOL

Try not and let the insults make ya lose your temper, thats what they are trying to do...
 
Posted by RiescoDiQui on :
 
but man that ether is nice while it lasts...
 
Posted by firefly on :
 
fuk it,,old and dosed lol
 
Posted by imakmony2005 on :
 
Monopoly Money
Member


Member Rated:
posted November 26, 2005 11:21 PM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
if you had a properly setup firewall you wouldent get trojans. Oh well price you pay to be uneducated in the ways of technology


quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by firefly:
nothing unusual
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


--------------------
M.M.
a few more weeks of skool and ill be almost done. Only 8 more semimesters to go WEEEEE, did i mention im broke?
I own 1 share of Qbid, and catching up to Jennifercd10 1 share at a time.
WAY OUT OF LINE MM!!!!!!!!!
 
Posted by imakmony2005 on :
 
WAY OUT OF LINE,MM BETTER START SPELLING BETTER BOY. HELL I DROPED OUT OF SCHOOL AT 15 GED.
 
Posted by RiescoDiQui on :
 
that explains ALOT
 
Posted by Dustoff101 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by DWE:
What's the deal with QBID? It has billions in volume but the PPS doesn't even move?

-------------------------------------------------
Start reading man, but I don't envy your task if ya do..LOL
 
Posted by firefly on :
 
Monopoly, Have you ever done any service which helps this country? Any real work?
 
Posted by Dustoff101 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by RiescoDiQui:
quote:
Originally posted by BuyTex:
after following some of these "landmark cases"? If the SEC cares about its reputation, new regs should promulgate, recognizing the "distinction" between "real stocks" and pinks:

quote:
OK, you're not bound by financial {income} reporting regs, BUT, YOU SIMPLY MUST file intent to increase/decrease Authorized Shares.
Violators face tar-n-feathering--if not worse...


Bottom line? Folks gotta get involved in the process. Jeez, this affects the entire economy...

At some point in the future investors will become involved by starting lawsuits...
Personally I don't know anyone thinking about it... It's just logical to assume that after soooooo many people have lost sooooo much money on one stock that atleast one of them would consult a lawyer.

-----------------------------------------------
Yicks! thats all thats needed now, then shareholders can standby and watch the Law Firms take the company and what ever assets it may or may not have...
 
Posted by RiescoDiQui on :
 
yeah it would be cointoss as far as which road would net them more money.
 
Posted by firefly on :
 
Hi imak [Smile]
 
Posted by Dustoff101 on :
 
imamonkey, hehe! Hey I see you are up and runing again..Little in house problem? LMAO
 
Posted by imakmony2005 on :
 
WHATS UP GUYS,Man a guy leaves for a few and bamm vermen every where, dam vermits.
 
Posted by firefly on :
 
imak you lost a star my friend damn
 
Posted by imakmony2005 on :
 
Know worrys Fly, If they love you thell come back and well you know what i mean, and i started this life with no stars.
 
Posted by imakmony2005 on :
 

 
Posted by firefly on :
 
and to think I gave you 1 star and you did the same to me lol
 
Posted by imakmony2005 on :
 
realy, sorry about 1
 
Posted by Dustoff101 on :
 
STARWARS!!!!!!!
 
Posted by RiescoDiQui on :
 
doesn't it just make you feel all warm and fuzzy inside?
 
Posted by Dustoff101 on :
 
I'm Star bushwhacking proof..Na na na na naaa na.
Can't bushwhack me anymore!LOL
 
Posted by firefly on :
 
LMAO
 
Posted by imakmony2005 on :
 
I SAY BRING IT ON NEXT WEEK,WELL RIESCODIQUI MY TWO THOUSAND DOLLAR LAPTOP IS DIEING SO KEEP LOSEING THAT MONEY.LOL
 
Posted by Dustoff101 on :
 
Hey, is there a fight brewing guys? if so let me throw some popcorn in the micro, and grab a cold one! Heck it's only 10 pm here, and I am burned out DDing stocks fer de nite!
 
Posted by RiescoDiQui on :
 
I will miss your omnipresence monky... I feel hollow without you here to guide me with that six thousand dollar pot of gold.
Pleae don't go....
please
please I am nothing without you.
OHHHHHHH how you wound me sir.
 
Posted by imakmony2005 on :
 
WHAT THE HELL.
 
Posted by Dustoff101 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by RiescoDiQui:
I will miss your omnipresence monky... I feel hollow without you here to guide me with that six thousand dollar pot of gold.
Pleae don't go....
please
please I am nothing without you.
OHHHHHHH how you wound me sir.

-------------------------------------------------

I think the Pinks are having somekind of weird effect on ya there Cowboy..LMAO
 
Posted by RiescoDiQui on :
 
HELL is right... that's wha it's like without you here to offer your wisdom....
Please leave us no more... we cannot go on without you
 
Posted by RiescoDiQui on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Dustoff101:
quote:
Originally posted by RiescoDiQui:
I will miss your omnipresence monky... I feel hollow without you here to guide me with that six thousand dollar pot of gold.
Pleae don't go....
please
please I am nothing without you.
OHHHHHHH how you wound me sir.

-------------------------------------------------

I think the Pinks are having somekind of weird effect on ya there Cowboy..LMAO

Hey go easy on the pinky talk there pumpkin
 
Posted by Dustoff101 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by RiescoDiQui:
HELL is right... that's wha it's like without you here to offer your wisdom....
Please leave us no more... we cannot go on without you

-------------------------------------------------
cALL A pRiest, he/s lost it! LMAO
 
Posted by Dustoff101 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Dustoff101:
quote:
Originally posted by RiescoDiQui:
HELL is right... that's wha it's like without you here to offer your wisdom....
Please leave us no more... we cannot go on without you

-------------------------------------------------
cALL A pRiest, he's lost it! LMAO


 
Posted by imakmony2005 on :
 
DUSTOFF, GET THE NET!!!
 
Posted by Dustoff101 on :
 
ooops, I studdard!
 
Posted by Dustoff101 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Dustoff101:
ooops, I studdard!

-------------------------------------------------

I'm laughing so hard, that now me an the edit button are at war with each other.........Geeezz, your killing me here!
 
Posted by RiescoDiQui on :
 
LOL.... I do what I can
 
Posted by Dustoff101 on :
 
PUMPKIN!!
 
Posted by firefly on :
 
ROTFLMAO
Too funny!
Think shooters came out tonight.
 
Posted by Dustoff101 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by imakmony2005:
DUSTOFF, GET THE NET!!!

-------------------------------------------------
mY EdIt bUtTOn took it!
 
Posted by imakmony2005 on :
 
NIGHT PUMPKIN.
 
Posted by Dustoff101 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Dustoff101:
quote:
Originally posted by imakmony2005:
DUSTOFF, GET THE NET!!!

-------------------------------------------------
Can't,mY EdIt bUtTOn took it!


 
Posted by RiescoDiQui on :
 
I just love the guys who use all caps... it's one of two things... they think the caps make them seem more important.
They aren't smart enough to remember when to capitalize and just figure why not cap them all.
 
Posted by Dustoff101 on :
 
I gotta go, you characters have me laughing so hard, I can't keep from double posting by mistake..I think my puter is about to have some kind of break down!

pumpkin, now thats really out in the left field..

I gotta get outa here, later, ya lunitics!LMAO
 
Posted by firefly on :
 
ries, , when I pop on your page I get a spam,, what's up pal.
 
Posted by firefly on :
 
lol dust
 
Posted by RiescoDiQui on :
 
spam?.... what page?
 
Posted by firefly on :
 
http://drudgereport.com/
Don't click
Yours
 
Posted by RiescoDiQui on :
 
oh... usually a pop up or two that come along with that page.... never really thought about it as I have a pop up blocker.
 
Posted by holmes on :
 
Does anyone know when they will begin airing in Australia and New Zealand? I see a agreement but no date to be aired.


BURBANK, CA – November 22, 2005 – Q Television Network (See OTCBB Other: QBID) today announced that it has entered into an affiliate agreement with Selectv, which will become the exclusive satellite provider of QTN programming throughout Australia and New Zealand.
 
Posted by HossTrader on :
 
Ok, heading to bed. Just wanted to say hey to Firefly and mention that the game sucked!! [Frown]

It was great up until the last 5 minutes!!

Nothing worse than freezing your butt off and then losing in the last 5 minutes of the freaking game. To hell with Georgia! [Smile]
 
Posted by mjm2005 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Dustoff101:
If the reverse split comes [ which it should ] make sure you sell at the top before it starts spiraling down again..Might recoup some lost shrs when it starts down after the new high caused by the split.

But do it quick, sometimes you can be pleasantly surprised when these Pinks do the reverse split..Just remember it will have a new stock symbol, so you really gotta move!

What's all this talk of a reverse split??
 
Posted by mjm2005 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Monopoly Money:
Couldnet turn on your TV and see MLON anyone in the US could you? What always keeps me here is the fact that i can see and touch what QBID is doing, not hope that they are telling me the truth. I.E. diamond dust.

quote:
Originally posted by imakmony2005:
MLON, SURE PUT OUT SOME GOOD PRS.LOL


It is a pretty bad stock to be a scam... With a stock like CMKX/CMKM, you can't track the progress. With QBID, you're just a phone call away (from a cable provider/headquarters) or can see the product in an instant, if you are lucky enough to be in one of the areas it is provided to.
 
Posted by Dustoff101 on :
 
From an article released from Stock Patrol .com

Regarding: Internet message boards used to tout or attack a company. Message boards have become a haven for zealots who are prepared to defend worthless companies, even though every available fact indicates that the company has virtually no chance of success. They offer little opportunity for honest debate; just a forum for a company’s fans, where negative messages are labeled as “bashing” and critics of the company are accused of undermining the stock.

Well, QBID is not worthless, but the part about zealots can not be denied!lol
 
Posted by Dustoff101 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by mjm2005:
quote:
Originally posted by Dustoff101:
If the reverse split comes [ which it should ] make sure you sell at the top before it starts spiraling down again..Might recoup some lost shrs when it starts down after the new high caused by the split.

But do it quick, sometimes you can be pleasantly surprised when these Pinks do the reverse split..Just remember it will have a new stock symbol, so you really gotta move!

What's all this talk of a reverse split??
-------------------------------------------------
60,000,000,000 SHRS in the A/S is always a red flag in a Pink Sheet,that a reverse split is coming...

Just a very good idea to figure in the possibility, regardless of what the CEO of a Pink tells you.
 
Posted by Monopoly Money on :
 
being on a team to start up a nuclear powerplanet could mean you were a floor sweeper, or the clean up crew. Just because you claim you were on said team, dosent implicate the importance of your job. Tho keeping the floors clean is probably important in such a critical environment.
**just pointing out the obvious**

quote:
Originally posted by firefly:
monopoly,,have you ever been in a team to start up a nuclear power plant? screw your statement about technology kid.



[ November 27, 2005, 09:30: Message edited by: Monopoly Money ]
 
Posted by Monopoly Money on :
 
Your complaining about my spelling when im sick and at work with basically no sleep. Shame on you. I was merely pointing out that if you had trojans on you system, which you claimed you did, then a properly setup firewall would have fixed that problem. Also setting up a firewall can be complex, and with your admittance of being a high school drop out, one can only assume you didnt seek higher education in learning the proper techniques of setting up said firewall. Yes learning on your own can take you somewhere, but its blantently obvious that you didnt know anything about setting up a firewall with your systems breech. Now just because you dont know alot about technology, which is very obvious, dosnet mean im inulting your intelligence in anyway, it merely meant that your lacking in knowledge about an area i am not.

Had you gotten all the way through high school and possibly into some college you might have realized what i was saying, but instead you decided to take it personally. Which is fine, I understand that such things are beyond the reach of some people.


quote:
Originally posted by imakmony2005:
WAY OUT OF LINE,MM BETTER START SPELLING BETTER BOY. HELL I DROPED OUT OF SCHOOL AT 15 GED.


 
Posted by Monopoly Money on :
 
Depends on what you mean by service? If you mean bringing better technology to such area's then yes. I work on the largest network in the world. Well no i can't say that, there is one network that is larger then what i work on, and that would be the "Internet". But other then that network, yes the one i work on is the largest, spanning over 215 countries and more fiber optic runs then you can count.

But if you mean i go out to countries feed the homeless, cure the sick, and right the wrongs, then no i can safely say i do not do that. I am only one poor man on the floating rock in space.


quote:
Originally posted by firefly:
Monopoly, Have you ever done any service which helps this country? Any real work?


 
Posted by Bottomliner on :
 
MM
You have a PM. [Smile]
 
Posted by Dustoff101 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Monopoly Money:
Depends on what you mean by service? If you mean bringing better technology to such area's then yes. I work on the largest network in the world. Well no i can't say that, there is one network that is larger then what i work on, and that would be the "Internet". But other then that network, yes the one i work on is the largest, spanning over 215 countries and more fiber optic runs then you can count.

-------------------------------------------------
Monopoly Money
Member


Member Rated:
posted November 27, 2005 09:22
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Your complaining about my spelling when im sick and at work with basically no sleep. Shame on you. I was merely pointing out that if you had trojans on you system, which you claimed you did, then a properly setup firewall would have fixed that problem. Also setting up a firewall can be complex, and with your admittance of being a high school drop out, one can only assume you didnt seek higher education in learning the proper techniques of setting up said firewall. Yes learning on your own can take you somewhere, but its blantently obvious that you didnt know anything about setting up a firewall with your systems breech. Now just because you dont know alot about technology, which is very obvious, dosnet mean im inulting your intelligence in anyway, it merely meant that your lacking in knowledge about an area i am not.

Had you gotten all the way through high school and possibly into some college you might have realized what i was saying, but instead you decided to take it personally. Which is fine, I understand that such things are beyond the reach of some people.


quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by imakmony2005:
WAY OUT OF LINE,MM BETTER START SPELLING BETTER BOY. HELL I DROPED OUT OF SCHOOL AT 15 GED.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


--------------------
M.M.
a few more weeks of skool and ill be almost done. Only 8 more semimesters to go WEEEEE, did i mention im broke?
I own 1 share of Qbid, and catching up to Jennifercd10 1 share at a time.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



But if you mean i go out to countries feed the homeless, cure the sick, and right the wrongs, then no i can safely say i do not do that. I am only one poor man on the floating rock in space.


quote:
Originally posted by firefly:
Monopoly, Have you ever done any service which helps this country? Any real work?


-------------------------------------------------
So, your saying you work for a large Internet company while being *sick without sleep* and most likely hungover? But use company time to post on a Pink, that you have a monitary position in..

Man, if ya worked for me? I would fire ya in a heartbeat..

They must have you at very simple position. Otherwise, sick people who don't know how to get proper rest before reporting for work can really do damage to a company..

[ November 27, 2005, 10:00: Message edited by: Dustoff101 ]
 
Posted by Bottomliner on :
 
mjm2005
Are you taking PM's? [Smile]
 
Posted by mjm2005 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Bottomliner:
mjm2005
Are you taking PM's? [Smile]

I'm taking them...but the Ohioan (Bob Frey) disabled them... ahhh, the Midwest, I love it...
 
Posted by Peaser01 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Dustoff101:
From an article released from Stock Patrol .com

Regarding: Internet message boards used to tout or attack a company. Message boards have become a haven for zealots who are prepared to defend worthless companies, even though every available fact indicates that the company has virtually no chance of success. They offer little opportunity for honest debate; just a forum for a company’s fans, where negative messages are labeled as “bashing” and critics of the company are accused of undermining the stock.

Well, QBID is not worthless, but the part about zealots can not be denied!lol

Kinda hits the nail on the head, huh Dust.
 
Posted by Monopoly Money on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Dustoff101:
So, your saying you work for a large Internet company while being *sick without sleep* and most likely hungover? But use company time to post on a Pink...

Man, if ya worked for me? I would fire ya in a heartbeat..

They must have you at very simple position. Otherwise, sick people who don't know how to get proper rest before reporting for work can really do damage to a company..

Did i say i worked for an internet company, no i didnt, i said i worked on the largest network in the world, next to the internet. Just because you make inferneces about things dosnet mean its true. Second, if doctors have time to post on a message board, why am i not allowed to have time to post especially when nothings going on. Just because i do my job efficiently and have a lot of free time dosnet make me a slacker. 3rd i work solo on saturday, and today im covering for someone who took vacation this morning. So even tho im not feeling good im still showing up for work. 4th, i didnt get sleep because i didnt feel good, sometimes its hard to sleep when you cant get comfortible, and i dont like painkillers, its the easy way out. 5th i dont drink, so i dont apprecaite your inference about my misuse of alcohol.

I really don't apprecaite your personal attacks on me espcailly when im not in the best of health. I further dont like your implication about my job duties, espcailly when you have no idea what i do or where i work for that matter.

However this is really good that you made these statements. You based your opinion about me on assumptions that you have created on loose information gathered from previous posts. With those assumptions, you formulated an opinion about me and posted about me in a negative mannor because of something that i said. Every last assumption was wrong, no matter which way you slice it. Seems to me that it fits a formula when you talk about stocks, specifically QBID. Well now that i know how you base your opinions, i shall take what you say with just a grain of salt, and shall remember how you came up with your assumptions for future reference.

have a wonderful Sunday
 
Posted by HossTrader on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Monopoly Money:
Your complaining about my spelling when im sick and at work with basically no sleep. Shame on you. I was merely pointing out that if you had trojans on you system, which you claimed you did, then a properly setup firewall would have fixed that problem. Also setting up a firewall can be complex, and with your admittance of being a high school drop out, one can only assume you didnt seek higher education in learning the proper techniques of setting up said firewall. Yes learning on your own can take you somewhere, but its blantently obvious that you didnt know anything about setting up a firewall with your systems breech. Now just because you dont know alot about technology, which is very obvious, dosnet mean im inulting your intelligence in anyway, it merely meant that your lacking in knowledge about an area i am not.

Had you gotten all the way through high school and possibly into some college you might have realized what i was saying, but instead you decided to take it personally. Which is fine, I understand that such things are beyond the reach of some people.


quote:
Originally posted by imakmony2005:
WAY OUT OF LINE,MM BETTER START SPELLING BETTER BOY. HELL I DROPED OUT OF SCHOOL AT 15 GED.


You whine a lot. Please quit telling us how bad off you are, and what a noble struggle you are going through. It is getting old. Lots of people go back to school when older and don't constantly have to remind everyone else. Some people even have real problems to deal with.

Then to flip from whiney to being snotty makes it even more annoying.
 
Posted by Dustoff101 on :
 
Member Buy Tex:


posted November 26, 2005 23:34
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
after following some of these "landmark cases"? If the SEC cares about its reputation, new regs should promulgate, recognizing the "distinction" between "real stocks" and pinks:


quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
OK, you're not bound by financial {income} reporting regs, BUT, YOU SIMPLY MUST file intent to increase/decrease Authorized Shares.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Violators face tar-n-feathering--if not worse...


Bottom line? Folks gotta get involved in the process. Jeez, this affects the entire economy...

--------------------
Adventures in microcapitalism...

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posts: 4366 | From: Fort Worth | Registered: Apr 2005
-------------------------------------------------
Good post Buy Tex, shine the light of day..
 
Posted by Dustoff101 on :
 
monopoly money, you should get 5 stars as our Allstocks whiner of the year..wha, wha, wha, I second the getting tired of it post.
 
Posted by Peaser01 on :
 
Well, I'm getting kinda tired, and all is in order here, good night pumpkin. I'll talk to ya tomorrow, or this afternoon when I wake up from my nappy-poo.

ROFLMAO. Man, I missed all the fun last night.
 
Posted by Monopoly Money on :
 
So am i to understand that presenting facts for my arguement is to be considered whineing, and then when i come back with some witty rhetoric it is to be considered snotty? I could have sworn that facts and wit were something to be had around here. Oh im sorry, i guess its when you twist the truth around to suit your own purpose. I appolgize if my facts and wit do not fit your criteria, and are not up to your standards for presentation. I shall work harder to skue my facts and presnet them in a mannor that is more acceptable to you. Please forgive my improper use of information that i understood to be the truth.

quote:
Originally posted by HossTrader:
quote:
Originally posted by imakmony2005:
WAY OUT OF LINE,MM BETTER START SPELLING BETTER BOY. HELL I DROPED OUT OF SCHOOL AT 15 GED.


You whine a lot. Please quit telling us how bad off you are, and what a noble struggle you are going through. It is getting old. Lots of people go back to school when older and don't constantly have to remind everyone else. Some people even have real problems to deal with.

Then to flip from whiney to being snotty makes it even more annoying. [/QB][/QUOTE]
 
Posted by Dustoff101 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Peaser01:
Well, I'm getting kinda tired, and all is in order here, good night pumpkin. I'll talk to ya tomorrow, or this afternoon when I wake up from my nappy-poo.

------------------------------------------------
Hey cupcake, just what we need, another lunitic around here..LOL
 
Posted by Peaser01 on :
 
Easy Gunner! lol Hey, I edited it. Go back and look.
 
Posted by Dustoff101 on :
 
Yep, it got like the old days when this was a fun stock and everybody was making money hand over fist!
 
Posted by RiescoDiQui on :
 
I think the abundance of tears shorted out his keyboard...
Poor guy looks like he has Niagara Falls shooting out of his eyes.
We should all chip in some money to buy him some antidepressents... seriously can we expect him to go on without some sort of medical help to deal with his horrific situation?
 
Posted by Hammer on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Peaser01:
quote:
Originally posted by Dustoff101:
From an article released from Stock Patrol .com

Regarding: Internet message boards used to tout or attack a company. Message boards have become a haven for zealots who are prepared to defend worthless companies, even though every available fact indicates that the company has virtually no chance of success. They offer little opportunity for honest debate; just a forum for a company’s fans, where negative messages are labeled as “bashing” and critics of the company are accused of undermining the stock.

Well, QBID is not worthless, but the part about zealots can not be denied!lol

Kinda hits the nail on the head, huh Dust.
Bumpity, bump, bump, bump!
 
Posted by Monopoly Money on :
 
Okay so you change the subject when i pounded you with facts that i could back up, and you could not refute. You dont bother to defend yourself, rather draw attention away from the subject at hand by dishing out personal attacks towards me. I fail to see how "whineing" and presenting facts for an arguement go togeather. Just becaues you fail to see the truth, or even worse, deny its existance, dosent mean its not there. Again this fits a formula/pattern that envolves how you talk about Qbid. Remarkable similarities.

quote:
Originally posted by Dustoff101:
monopoly money, you should get 5 stars as our Allstocks whiner of the year..wha, wha, wha, I second the getting tired of it post.


 
Posted by whizknock on :
 
The story isn't over here!

I still believe,,

"All we ever had to do is launch!"
 
Posted by Dustoff101 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Monopoly Money:
Okay so you change the subject when i pounded you with facts that i could back up, and you could not refute. You dont bother to defend yourself, rather draw attention away from the subject at hand by dishing out personal attacks towards me. I fail to see how "whineing" and presenting facts for an arguement go togeather. Just becaues you fail to see the truth, or even worse, deny its existance, dosent mean its not there. Again this fits a formula/pattern that envolves how you talk about Qbid. Remarkable similarities.

quote:
Originally posted by Dustoff101:
monopoly money, you should get 5 stars as our Allstocks whiner of the year..wha, wha, wha, I second the getting tired of it post.


-----------------------------------------------
What in the world are you talking about child?

You better go back to the PM section and get
better directives.LMAO
 
Posted by RiescoDiQui on :
 
Wow our little cupcake is moody today... all out cryfest to pissy in like three seconds.... what's wrong mm... sandy vag*#na?
 
Posted by HossTrader on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Monopoly Money:
So am i to understand that presenting facts for my arguement is to be considered whineing, and then when i come back with some witty rhetoric it is to be considered snotty? I could have sworn that facts and wit were something to be had around here. Oh im sorry, i guess its when you twist the truth around to suit your own purpose. I appolgize if my facts and wit do not fit your criteria, and are not up to your standards for presentation. I shall work harder to skue my facts and presnet them in a mannor that is more acceptable to you. Please forgive my improper use of information that i understood to be the truth.

quote:
Originally posted by HossTrader:
quote:
Originally posted by imakmony2005:
WAY OUT OF LINE,MM BETTER START SPELLING BETTER BOY. HELL I DROPED OUT OF SCHOOL AT 15 GED.


You whine a lot. Please quit telling us how bad off you are, and what a noble struggle you are going through. It is getting old. Lots of people go back to school when older and don't constantly have to remind everyone else. Some people even have real problems to deal with.

Then to flip from whiney to being snotty makes it even more annoying.

[/QB][/QUOTE]


Don't be such a drama queen. I didn't comment on any "facts". I said you whine a lot. This sort of emphasizes the point.
 
Posted by RiescoDiQui on :
 
thank the maker doc isn't here or we would all be banned.
This kind of reminds me what this board used to be like.
 
Posted by Dustoff101 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by whizknock:
The story isn't over here!

I still believe,,

"All we ever had to do is launch!"

-------------------------------------------------
Ya missed the fun last night, man the old thread was rocking..

I know you are sincere, but I think I do remember you having a good sense of humor..

Hey that cash machine G... sure is paying some bills, believe me, you got a *set of um* the way you can HOLD large positions in these Pinks and OTCBB'S.. Just not my style..
 
Posted by RiescoDiQui on :
 
two page add and a sticker on every dvd in the pilot stores.... subs are going to be streaming in... price is going to rocket... yep huge.
 
Posted by Monopoly Money on :
 
Im confused, you guys attack me personally, then when i present an arguement based on facts. You then preceed to change the subject, resort to name calling and insinuations about myself. Apparently your lack of respect for other posters is the reason why no one really cares to talk to you guys, or kids, or whatever disecription you wish to be called.

If you think presenting facts in a constructive mannor is to be considered whining, then sign me up for the whiner of the year award and i shall happily accept it. If "hes cring on the keyboard" is a metaphore for he's coming up with well thought out posts, then yes i guess i am. Also i see that its 4 of you ganging up on little o'l me. Whats wrong can it not just be one person against me or is it, "with your powers combined you are CAPTAIN WITLESS!!!"

you know gangs in the hood pick on people too, and its not right there either. Fortunately here or there i can defend myself. I do appologize for sticking up for myself, even if it dosent agree with what your use to.

P.S. also im at work, delayed posts are gonig to happen. *didnt we already cover this?*
 
Posted by Dustoff101 on :
 
imamonkey, must be off catching the morning swell. But I bet he is wearing a wet suit.
 
Posted by HossTrader on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Monopoly Money:
Im confused, you guys attack me personally, then when i present an arguement based on facts. You then preceed to change the subject, resort to name calling and insinuations about myself. Apparently your lack of respect for other posters is the reason why no one really cares to talk to you guys, or kids, or whatever disecription you wish to be called.

If you think presenting facts in a constructive mannor is to be considered whining, then sign me up for the whiner of the year award and i shall happily accept it. If "hes cring on the keyboard" is a metaphore for he's coming up with well thought out posts, then yes i guess i am. Also i see that its 4 of you ganging up on little o'l me. Whats wrong can it not just be one person against me or is it, "with your powers combined you are CAPTAIN WITLESS!!!"

you know gangs in the hood pick on people too, and its not right there either. Fortunately here or there i can defend myself. I do appologize for sticking up for myself, even if it dosent agree with what your use to.

P.S. also im at work, delayed posts are gonig to happen. *didnt we already cover this?*

Don't lump me in with them. I didn't mean to get on a gang tackle.
I wouldn't have even commented on anything until you started giving someone a hard time about their education level. Hardly makes you the poster child for respecting other posters. That was kind of the last straw.

As to whatever argument you are having with other folks. Go to it.

But please don't say you don't whine. Even your various sigs over the last few months talk about your struggling student-hood, or being broke, etc.
 
Posted by airdoo on :
 
what's with the circuit city advertisment???
 
Posted by Dustoff101 on :
 
posted November 26, 2005 21:42
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by Monopoly Money:
my appologies, im at work and im pretty sick. Please forgive me if im not the best of conveying ideas at this point in time. I shall try to better display more complete thoughts in future posts, just for you.


quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by Dustoff101:

quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by Monopoly Money:
Couldnet turn on your TV and see MLON anyone in the US could you? What always keeps me here is the fact that i can see and touch what QBID is doing, not hope that they are telling me the truth. I.E. diamond dust.


quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by imakmony2005:
MLON, SURE PUT OUT SOME GOOD PRS.LOL
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------
Excuse me, but since you are a now college student, would you edit your post so it makes sense. I have a hard tme with poor spelling, and sentance structure, unless of course it is my own.LOL

I left a little sumpin in my paragraph fer ya! LOL
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------
No problem, just kidding ya...

Hey, do ya know if the new Macromedia update is a virus like the one a while back...Seems to me it came in on the week-end as well, but can't be sure..It is blinking away on all my computers at the present time..Maybe some of you computer geeks know sumpin us *amatuer computer folks* don't.
-----------------------------------------------

Does this really read like a personal attack?
 
Posted by LEO on :
 
airdoo, it's spillover from the gzfx thread...sounds like it might not be too late to jump into that one.
 
Posted by HossTrader on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by airdoo:
what's with the circuit city advertisment???

Different stock. Not Q related.
 
Posted by Dustoff101 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Dustoff101:
posted November 26, 2005 21:42
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by Monopoly Money:
my appologies, im at work and im pretty sick. Please forgive me if im not the best of conveying ideas at this point in time. I shall try to better display more complete thoughts in future posts, just for you.


quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by Dustoff101:

quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by Monopoly Money:
Couldnet turn on your TV and see MLON anyone in the US could you? What always keeps me here is the fact that i can see and touch what QBID is doing, not hope that they are telling me the truth. I.E. diamond dust.


quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by imakmony2005:
MLON, SURE PUT OUT SOME GOOD PRS.LOL
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------
Excuse me, but since you are a now college student, would you edit your post so it makes sense. I have a hard tme with poor spelling, and sentance structure, unless of course it is my own.LOL

I left a little sumpin in my paragraph fer ya! LOL
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------
By Dustoff: No problem, just kidding ya...

Hey, do ya know if the new Macromedia update is a virus like the one a while back...Seems to me it came in on the week-end as well, but can't be sure..It is blinking away on all my computers at the present time..Maybe some of you computer geeks know sumpin us *amatuer computer folks* don't.
-----------------------------------------------

Does this really read like a personal attack?


 
Posted by Dustoff101 on :
 
edited, double post.
 
Posted by Monopoly Money on :
 
So if you jump in the middle of a gang fight and try to attack the sole person being assaulted, you dont consider yourself one of the assailants? Because thats what i just read. The education part about networks and firewalls, i hate to break the news to you but that statement refers to about 95% of the populous so if he took it personally its not my fault. As far as comments in my sig, if you didnt notice they were more for humor then anything, but seeing how you think beating up on someone thats already being gang raped shouldent include you in the collective. I can see how your sense of humor would be lacking just a little bit. It is kinda funny, "i didnt mean to attack that guy, but he pointed at me while he was being beat on by several other people and i took offense so i had to go beat on him myself. OOO no dont lump me in with those other guys who were beating on him i was just a individual contributer." Now THAT is funny, maybe you do have a sense of humor.

quote:
Originally posted by HossTrader:
[QUOTE]
Don't lump me in with them. I didn't mean to get on a gang tackle.
I wouldn't have even commented on anything until you started giving someone a hard time about their education level. Hardly makes you the poster child for respecting other posters. That was kind of the last straw.

As to whatever argument you are having with other folks. Go to it.

But please don't say you don't whine. Even your various sigs over the last few months talk about your struggling student-hood, or being broke, etc.


 
Posted by HossTrader on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Monopoly Money:
So if you jump in the middle of a gang fight and try to attack the sole person being assaulted, you dont consider yourself one of the assailants? Because thats what i just read. The education part about networks and firewalls, i hate to break the news to you but that statement refers to about 95% of the populous so if he took it personally its not my fault. As far as comments in my sig, if you didnt notice they were more for humor then anything, but seeing how you think beating up on someone thats already being gang raped shouldent include you in the collective. I can see how your sense of humor would be lacking just a little bit. It is kinda funny, "i didnt mean to attack that guy, but he pointed at me while he was being beat on by several other people and i took offense so i had to go beat on him myself. OOO no dont lump me in with those other guys who were beating on him i was just a individual contributer." Now THAT is funny, maybe you do have a sense of humor.

quote:
Originally posted by HossTrader:
[QUOTE]
Don't lump me in with them. I didn't mean to get on a gang tackle.
I wouldn't have even commented on anything until you started giving someone a hard time about their education level. Hardly makes you the poster child for respecting other posters. That was kind of the last straw.

As to whatever argument you are having with other folks. Go to it.

But please don't say you don't whine. Even your various sigs over the last few months talk about your struggling student-hood, or being broke, etc.


How do you even type from that cross you keep putting yourself on? Get over it.

And if you take that personally, it isn't my fault [Smile]
 
Posted by mjm2005 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by mjm2005:
quote:
Originally posted by Bottomliner:
mjm2005
Are you taking PM's? [Smile]

I'm taking them...but the Ohioan (Bob Frey) disabled them... ahhh, the Midwest, I love it...
actually...I was thinking about it...if you want to get in touch with me... try mcgrmj5*wfu.edu ...I'll probably have to make some sort of manual signature with that attached since my signature/PM ability is locked... Is there some Ohio/NJ or Ohio/NC rivalry I'm unaware of? Do Ohio people hate WFU students or college students in general?

(((That star up there is an "at" sign" it's just a normal email...FYI)))
 
Posted by Dustoff101 on :
 
monopoly money, I think you better get that sleep, you say you are not getting..Chill out dude..You are making a fool out of yourself..
 
Posted by buckwheatbob on :
 
The attacks also fall under what you wrote in the reverse fashion. Please explain how Q has no chance of success with the huge carriers that are in place? Do you think that TW and the others would allow Q to take a place on their listing and or bump another station if there was no chance of success? Now the Auzzies have signed them up. Sky service next in Europe? Good possibility. Dishnet next? Also good possibility.

Although I hear your points, the other side of the coin is far from fact less to move forward. Frank may not have the audit out to show the investors at the moment, but progression of the company is publicly being shown by some of the biggest cable heads in the industry. Now as the new crowd that has moved in here and claims this stock is going nowhere, are you also claiming that the carriers in place are scams and those companies have no clue what they are doing?

I am not trying to start a fight with you so I will put that up front. The point is there is a ton of fact and not necessarily from Q that supports the company moving forward. As things do move forward the PPS will adjust accordingly. Now I know you are going to bring up the PPS goes down on good news.

Guys like U4 pumped the hell out of this stock, they got what they wanted and did the flip side and bashed it to death. I am interested on an explanation on that theory along with the Dianna theory. I am also interested to hear what you think on the damage that Guys like U4 and Dianna did to a company that may just be legitimate, and I am serious about what I said about wanting to hear your theory.

Now, I am not saying that pinks are safe by any means, and I agree that there are some scams out there, but I think if some one wants to make a choice to buy Q, you too also need to do an honest judgment for posting the truth as you claim you do.

I have looked at both sides of this coin including all the positive posts, the neutral posts and the negative posts. Although Frank may be far from being diligent on things, I am seeing progression and forward movement. Last year there was a list that guys like U4 put out on all the things this company was not and will never do. Last time I saw that list, it seemed to be getting very short as Q had accomplished things on that list that everyone said would never happen.

That takes me back to the motive of the negative posters that said those accomplishments would never happen but have. It seems that fact on the negative side seems to be loosing ground until another straw gets grasped at. I am looking forward to hear from you as a discussion and not an argument. I also know what my own position is on this but that is not what I am interested in discussing. I am hoping for an open minded conversation. [Smile]


quote:
Originally posted by Dustoff101:
From an article released from Stock Patrol .com

Regarding: Internet message boards used to tout or attack a company. Message boards have become a haven for zealots who are prepared to defend worthless companies, even though every available fact indicates that the company has virtually no chance of success. They offer little opportunity for honest debate; just a forum for a company’s fans, where negative messages are labeled as “bashing” and critics of the company are accused of undermining the stock.

Well, QBID is not worthless, but the part about zealots can not be denied!lol


 
Posted by Monopoly Money on :
 
no im saying this is a personal attack which was a reply you made to a conversation that had nothing to do with you. Or did you forget this already?

quote:
Originally posted by Dustoff101:
So, your saying you work for a large Internet company while being *sick without sleep* and most likely hungover? But use company time to post on a Pink, that you have a monitary position in..

Man, if ya worked for me? I would fire ya in a heartbeat..

They must have you at very simple position. Otherwise, sick people who don't know how to get proper rest before reporting for work can really do damage to a company..


 
Posted by HossTrader on :
 
It's been fun. See yall tonight/ tomorrow.
I am sure there will be plenty to respond to then! LOL

Maybe Frank will give us some happy news to start the week off!
 
Posted by Monopoly Money on :
 
Keyboard extensions, lots of keyboard extensions

quote:
Originally posted by HossTrader:
[QUOTE]
How do you even type from that cross you keep putting yourself on? Get over it.

And if you take that personally, it isn't my fault [Smile]


 
Posted by Penny-Trader on :
 
I agree that a R/S is eminet in this this stock.

i have said that for a long time now.

Frank told us that there would not be a r/s many times, but he also led us to believe many times that the float never increased but here we are.

I still remain optimistic that the company will survive and be successful. I however dont am not holding my breath about being able to retire off of this stock.

I dont care if we r/s as long as the value doesnt drop back to these levels again after the split.

Rod


quote:
Originally posted by Dustoff101:
quote:
Originally posted by mjm2005:
quote:
Originally posted by Dustoff101:
If the reverse split comes [ which it should ] make sure you sell at the top before it starts spiraling down again..Might recoup some lost shrs when it starts down after the new high caused by the split.

But do it quick, sometimes you can be pleasantly surprised when these Pinks do the reverse split..Just remember it will have a new stock symbol, so you really gotta move!

What's all this talk of a reverse split??
-------------------------------------------------
60,000,000,000 SHRS in the A/S is always a red flag in a Pink Sheet,that a reverse split is coming...

Just a very good idea to figure in the possibility, regardless of what the CEO of a Pink tells you.


 
Posted by Penny-Trader on :
 
So your saying then that you never went to work while you where sick? you never felt the need to go the extra mile for your employer, or fellow workers, so that they would not be put out or have to carry a heavier load in your absence?

if not then i would not hire you.

im not trying to get in the middle of this, but i think this has gotten blown out of proportion over a couple of spelling mistakes.

you no guys it takes a bigger man to forgive and forget then it does to sit in the anonymity of a computer screen and sling insults back and forth in a public forum.

you are all old enough and smart enough to realise this is getting to be a stupid pissing match.

if this is all you have to do on a weekend i pity you.

so lets drop this quibbling and get back to a decent respectable discussion on the stock that this board is about.

I have read 3 pages now and nothing relevant about the stock has been mentioned.

I have no problem with friendly chat, as i have engaged in this as well, but if you have nothing good to say about each other, then take it off line and do it in pms.

Rodney

quote:
Originally posted by Dustoff101:
quote:
Originally posted by Monopoly Money:
Depends on what you mean by service? If you mean bringing better technology to such area's then yes. I work on the largest network in the world. Well no i can't say that, there is one network that is larger then what i work on, and that would be the "Internet". But other then that network, yes the one i work on is the largest, spanning over 215 countries and more fiber optic runs then you can count.

-------------------------------------------------
Monopoly Money
Member


Member Rated:
posted November 27, 2005 09:22
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Your complaining about my spelling when im sick and at work with basically no sleep. Shame on you. I was merely pointing out that if you had trojans on you system, which you claimed you did, then a properly setup firewall would have fixed that problem. Also setting up a firewall can be complex, and with your admittance of being a high school drop out, one can only assume you didnt seek higher education in learning the proper techniques of setting up said firewall. Yes learning on your own can take you somewhere, but its blantently obvious that you didnt know anything about setting up a firewall with your systems breech. Now just because you dont know alot about technology, which is very obvious, dosnet mean im inulting your intelligence in anyway, it merely meant that your lacking in knowledge about an area i am not.

Had you gotten all the way through high school and possibly into some college you might have realized what i was saying, but instead you decided to take it personally. Which is fine, I understand that such things are beyond the reach of some people.


quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by imakmony2005:
WAY OUT OF LINE,MM BETTER START SPELLING BETTER BOY. HELL I DROPED OUT OF SCHOOL AT 15 GED.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


--------------------
M.M.
a few more weeks of skool and ill be almost done. Only 8 more semimesters to go WEEEEE, did i mention im broke?
I own 1 share of Qbid, and catching up to Jennifercd10 1 share at a time.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



But if you mean i go out to countries feed the homeless, cure the sick, and right the wrongs, then no i can safely say i do not do that. I am only one poor man on the floating rock in space.


quote:
Originally posted by firefly:
Monopoly, Have you ever done any service which helps this country? Any real work?


-------------------------------------------------
So, your saying you work for a large Internet company while being *sick without sleep* and most likely hungover? But use company time to post on a Pink, that you have a monitary position in..

Man, if ya worked for me? I would fire ya in a heartbeat..

They must have you at very simple position. Otherwise, sick people who don't know how to get proper rest before reporting for work can really do damage to a company..


 
Posted by Dustoff101 on :
 
Buckwheat, all we have is a lot of pontificaters from both sides who speculate from a book with to many missing pages..

We need transparancy!

Then let the chips fall where they may..

I am totaly convinced that the massive dilution O/S and A/S is leeding shr holders down a unrelenting spiral. The PPS just can't get traction, you would think otherwise, with all the the milestones this company successfuly passes... It's like an enigma.
 
Posted by Dustoff101 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Penny-Trader:
So your saying then that you never went to work while you where sick? you never felt the need to go the extra mile for your employer, or fellow workers, so that they would not be put out or have to carry a heavier load in your absence?

if not then i would not hire you.

im not trying to get in the middle of this, but i think this has gotten blown out of proportion over a couple of spelling mistakes.

you no guys it takes a bigger man to forgive and forget then it does to sit in the anonymity of a computer screen and sling insults back and forth in a public forum.

you are all old enough and smart enough to realise this is getting to be a stupid pissing match.

if this is all you have to do on a weekend i pity you.

so lets drop this quibbling and get back to a decent respectable discussion on the stock that this board is about.

I have read 3 pages now and nothing relevant about the stock has been mentioned.

I have no problem with friendly chat, as i have engaged in this as well, but if you have nothing good to say about each other, then take it off line and do it in pms.

Rodney

quote:
Originally posted by Dustoff101:
quote:
Originally posted by Monopoly Money:
Depends on what you mean by service? If you mean bringing better technology to such area's then yes. I work on the largest network in the world. Well no i can't say that, there is one network that is larger then what i work on, and that would be the "Internet". But other then that network, yes the one i work on is the largest, spanning over 215 countries and more fiber optic runs then you can count.

-------------------------------------------------
Monopoly Money
Member


Member Rated:
posted November 27, 2005 09:22
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Your complaining about my spelling when im sick and at work with basically no sleep. Shame on you. I was merely pointing out that if you had trojans on you system, which you claimed you did, then a properly setup firewall would have fixed that problem. Also setting up a firewall can be complex, and with your admittance of being a high school drop out, one can only assume you didnt seek higher education in learning the proper techniques of setting up said firewall. Yes learning on your own can take you somewhere, but its blantently obvious that you didnt know anything about setting up a firewall with your systems breech. Now just because you dont know alot about technology, which is very obvious, dosnet mean im inulting your intelligence in anyway, it merely meant that your lacking in knowledge about an area i am not.

Had you gotten all the way through high school and possibly into some college you might have realized what i was saying, but instead you decided to take it personally. Which is fine, I understand that such things are beyond the reach of some people.


quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by imakmony2005:
WAY OUT OF LINE,MM BETTER START SPELLING BETTER BOY. HELL I DROPED OUT OF SCHOOL AT 15 GED.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


--------------------
M.M.
a few more weeks of skool and ill be almost done. Only 8 more semimesters to go WEEEEE, did i mention im broke?
I own 1 share of Qbid, and catching up to Jennifercd10 1 share at a time.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



But if you mean i go out to countries feed the homeless, cure the sick, and right the wrongs, then no i can safely say i do not do that. I am only one poor man on the floating rock in space.


quote:
Originally posted by firefly:
Monopoly, Have you ever done any service which helps this country? Any real work?


-------------------------------------------------
So, your saying you work for a large Internet company while being *sick without sleep* and most likely hungover? But use company time to post on a Pink, that you have a monitary position in..

Man, if ya worked for me? I would fire ya in a heartbeat..

They must have you at very simple position. Otherwise, sick people who don't know how to get proper rest before reporting for work can really do damage to a company..


------------------------------------------------
Ya, ya, ya, whatever, same o same o..Remember your bait trick? did not work, gonna try again?

Go ahead, but I'm outa here..Got things to do.
 
Posted by Bottomliner on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by mjm2005:
... Is there some Ohio/NJ or Ohio/NC rivalry I'm unaware of? Do Ohio people hate WFU students or college students in general?

mjm
Not that I know of ... but I can only speak for myself. [Smile]

By the way, I didn't know allstocks ever shuts down PM privileges but allows public posting. I thought "banning" was all or nothing. Are you sure you cannot PM?
 
Posted by airdoo on :
 
i was experiencing this problem not too long ago too. i sent many many messages to bob and after a week he gave me full priveledges again. just be patient and keep sending him messages. if you really did nothing wrong you will get your rights back.
quote:
Originally posted by Bottomliner:
quote:
Originally posted by mjm2005:
... Is there some Ohio/NJ or Ohio/NC rivalry I'm unaware of? Do Ohio people hate WFU students or college students in general?

mjm
Not that I know of ... but I can only speak for myself. [Smile]

By the way, I didn't know allstocks ever shuts down PM privileges but allows public posting. I thought "banning" was all or nothing. Are you sure you cannot PM?


 
Posted by buckwheatbob on :
 
I agree we need some traction. The PPS does not have much further to hit bottom. You have to agree, pages of the book are showing up one at a time. Not necessarily from Q, but from the outside companies which do business with Q that do have transparency and in a huge way. Just a guess but the transparency you mention will no doubt show up by the time the games hit next year as this event will not doubt be one of the worlds largest at the beginning of a mile stone.

I guess the bottom line is Rome was not built in a day and I guess that could also apply to a network. I guess a good point to make is people can get very ansy and impatient and some things take much longer to build than others.


quote:
Originally posted by Dustoff101:
Buckwheat, all we have is a lot of pontificaters from both sides who speculate from a book with to many missing pages..

We need transparancy!

Then let the chips fall where they may..

I am totaly convinced that the massive dilution O/S and A/S is leeding shr holders down a unrelenting spiral. The PPS just can't get traction, you would think otherwise, with all the the milestones this company successfuly passes... It's like an enigma.


 
Posted by Monopoly Money on :
 
whoops
 
Posted by Penny-Trader on :
 
you have no idea what you are talking about.

the bait trick worked very well thank you.

same o same o is right.

you cant even admit that you are old enough and smart enough to realise that you know how stupid it is to argue over someones spelling.

Act your age instead of acting like the spoiled rotten child that you are acting like.

I am done responding to you on a public forum, you have problems with me, take it off line with me. no one here wants to watch a pissing match.

Rod
 
Posted by Monopoly Money on :
 
I appologize, i felt it neccessary to defend myself espcailly after getting ganged up on by multiple people. I like an underdog fight, unfortunately it was only by numbers, not by wit. I will try to take this to PM's in the future so not to waist everyones times.
 
Posted by Penny-Trader on :
 
my message was not pointed at you MM.

you did fine.

when you sit back and watch you can see who is grasping at straws in the discussion

Rod
 
Posted by Dustoff101 on :
 
P.T popped in for a sec, and noticed your response. I agree, lets take it off line.

But you have me on ignore on your PM list.

I'm good, but not so good as to win an arguement with myself..Not much satisfaction in that.

Seriously I won't be able to respond for awile, I've got a stained glass project I have to complete.$$$$$$$$$$
 
Posted by QBID'n on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Dustoff101:
[QUOTE]

Go ahead, but I'm outa here..Got things to do.

Sheeeshhh...finally!

Man!....I didn't think the b/s would ever end. Now maybe someone can post a more appreciative post. These guys come and go, but when they are gone it's always good to read the postings from all the regulars who maturely and respectfully participate in the developmental discussions of Q.
 
Posted by Rich735 on :
 
A lot of b/s this weekend on the board!
 
Posted by mjm2005 on :
 
Weren't we QBID 33 last thread??? haha...
 
Posted by mjm2005 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by RiescoDiQui:
two page add and a sticker on every dvd in the pilot stores.... subs are going to be streaming in... price is going to rocket... yep huge.

Isucceedhere, what does that mean?
 
Posted by mjm2005 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by LEO:
airdoo, it's spillover from the gzfx thread...sounds like it might not be too late to jump into that one.

Im looking to get in on that soon...but I need capital and a little more reading before I make any more stock purchases (however small or large they may be)...
 
Posted by imakmony2005 on :
 
MJM, BOB IS A GREAT GUY NO ONE HATES YOU MAN.
 
Posted by RiescoDiQui on :
 
hey monky... you might want to whipe that little brown ring off your nose.
 
Posted by QBID'n on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Penny-Trader:
I agree that a R/S is eminet in this this stock.

i have said that for a long time now.

Frank told us that there would not be a r/s many times, but he also led us to believe many times that the float never increased but here we are.

I still remain optimistic that the company will survive and be successful. I however dont am not holding my breath about being able to retire off of this stock.

I dont care if we r/s as long as the value doesnt drop back to these levels again after the split.

Rod

I can understand your frustration PT. And I’m sure that there are others too who also share your frustrations, including myself. In fact, there is no doubt that some people on this board, in my view have not lived through this type of dynamic before and are unsure what to do.

But I, I keep trying to remain focused because I believe. I believe the efforts Frank continues will someday make both, the shareholders and him benefit greatly.

In previous posts, many of you seasoned members have laid out, as to why and when a r/s can benefit Q/TMM, if it happens. Some of you have said that all the conditions are in place and a solid plan is being implemented. Hands down, that is certainly agreeable.

I just find it funny when some people come and go on this board because when they come, they talk of selling and/or throwing Franks efforts into the wind. But they are doing it for all the wrong reasons in my view. Frank may be many things to many people, but to me he is the mule that pulls the plow. He is doing what he has to do to build Q, and yet sadly enough, he continues to infuriate some investors who are impatient and blinded by emotion and instant greed. jmho

[ November 27, 2005, 15:20: Message edited by: QBID'n ]
 
Posted by Penny-Trader on :
 
y i hear ya QBIDn. i am however not frustrated. i put the money in and i said i would leave it till they are bust or majorly successful and proffitable.

so frustrated no dissappointed, ya.

no worries though. as i have always stated i only invested what i can afford to lose.


Rod
 
Posted by QBID'n on :
 
I understand PT [Smile]
 
Posted by kaos on :
 
hey everyone...just a question/thought....what do you suppose would happen to the stock if a really large broad casting company came in an bought out the q just before or right after the olympics....what do you think..... [Confused]
 
Posted by Jonas Inv. on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by kaos:
hey everyone...just a question/thought....what do you suppose would happen to the stock if a really large broad casting company came in an bought out the q just before or right after the olympics....what do you think..... [Confused]

I would say, keep on dreaming!!! [Roll Eyes]
 
Posted by Penny-Trader on :
 
is that a Fat casting company? a female casting company, or a Broadcasting company lol

just bugging.


that would be fine by me. they will buy us up at the time when we are shining most and in the faces of everyone. I believe that is the plan to dump the company around the time of the Gay Games.

this is only a theory, nothing to back that up.

id be happy with .05 at this point in time.

rod
 
Posted by Marty on :
 
A stock, is only as good as the company, and it's market/objectives, and is only as good as the management that runs it....
So,
A = business plan/companies market/objectves
(potential income) per year
B = obtainable market share (potentially, 5bill) per year
C = actual market share per year
D = debt/expenses per month (burn rate)
E = Gross revenue per year
F = Net revenue per year

So, if A = 5bill, then
B = 5000000000
C = companies shareof market...let's say 1%
1% of 5bill = 50000000
D = 1mill x 12 = 12mill (approximate burn rate, per month)
E = 12mill
F = 50000000 - 12000000 = 38000000

This leaves an unaudited income of
38mill per year (assuming 1%)

G = A/S (shares) = 50000000000 (assumed)
H = F / G = 38000000 / 50000000000 = 0.00076

H = 0.00076 per share, based on income

This doesn't take into account, other income, assets or potential market cap. You decide. (It's all congecture and hypothessis, and) JMHO, take it or leave it....GLTA...
 
Posted by Monopoly Money on :
 
I really think the GG06 is just the begining, keep in mind it would be the point where we would be shining the most, relative to previous events. You have lots of yearly events, and whats going to see our numbers in Melbourne soar is this Melbourne
Australia 20 Pride March Victoria 2/5/2006
which can be found here http://www.interpride.org/
This, i think, will be a huge time for QTN in Aussie land Espcailly if they are covering the event live, so the people that can't attent could watch a "free trial period of QTN" to see how they like it. Which would be huge advertisement for the area.

You also got a multitude of events that Q could attend all acorss the world, but espcailly in coverage areas. For the Q going international, its only the begining, i really believe we have not seen anything yet. If you understand events going on in the GLBT community you will see there are huge opportunities for the Q to spead out to their primary audience.

Here is a list of american gay pride marches
http://www.pinkuk.com/events/pride2006datesamerica.asp which could be potiential opporQunities to spread the word of Q. If they have live coverage in major area's like they usually do i see no reason why they wouldent have a ratings soar. Not only will the GLBT have physical pressence numbers but also ratings of Q to back up their cause. It really is interesting once you throw in other possiblities and MULTIQAST that they could provide for the GLBT community not locally, not nationally, but GLQBALY.

I don't see it very long before we have a subscription base that could rival most other Pay channels.

This is all based on what i know and how i feel QTN could handle the situations, espcailly in the advent of Int'l carriage. Please do not base a decision on buying or selling on my megar input. But it is exciting when i think about it.
 
Posted by Deg's wife on :
 
Penny Trader..you have a pm
 
Posted by Penny-Trader on :
 
Back at ya [Wink]

quote:
Originally posted by Deg's wife:
Penny Trader..you have a pm


 
Posted by noah129 on :
 
[Big Grin] hey qbidians hows everyone feeling? just thought i would pop on in and see if there was anything of interest to read. unfortunately i was a bit dissapointed with all the arguing going back and forth. oh well sometimes its awsome reading and other times i am embarressed that i spend so much time reading hehehe.

wow i just spaced out that alot i hope this is easier for all of you to read.hahaha.anyways tommorrow is another day . one day closer to the q reaching its goals. i am still happy with this investment but obviously like most unhappy with the current pps. i continue to read whiz's list every time i get a chance and that is great for renewing the faith for me. try it out qbidians it really helps. also sometimes i cruise through the west village in manhatten and that tends to renew my faith in glbt programming becuase i see tons of gay/lesbian people that seem like if they were to watch tv they would be watching qtv. ok sorry i dont have much to add here just though i would put in my two cents, and wait for the morning to see what action awaits us. ut oh i just realized i didnt put that into proper paragraphs.sorry i truly am a qbidiot idiot hehehe.

when did the qbid board become my english class again. i thought i was out of school? strange but understandable when we are edgy and impatient we tend to nitpick eachothers every word or way of being. if its not too much to ask lets try and keep this board related to qtv and all that surrounds this company and not our own arguments/annoyances with eachothers spelling and such. thanx in advance.

sincerely noah the superqbidiot.

its sad i was recently diagnosed with qbidahualizm [Razz] [Razz] [Razz]
 
Posted by Penny-Trader on :
 
Hey noah nice to see the spacing. and your right. people do get on edge around here.

its all or nothing for me on this stock.

all i can say is FRANKY............


GIT ER DONNNNNEEEEEEEEE
 
Posted by HossTrader on :
 
LOL I just got back and am catching up with the day. And I am here to officially apologize for jumping into things this morning!! [Big Grin]
It was just one of those mornings and things struck a chord and it felt better to argue it than let it slide. And for that I am sorry!

As for QBID, I wish I had more info to post more, but until we get more news, this whole thread is basically off topic.

I still see that Frank is building a good business (and yes, it might be at our expense right now).
But even if you assume the O/S is the full 60 billion shares.
Then if you assume the company is worth a conservative $1 billion,
then you are still left with .016 pps.
And I will be on a looooong vacation at that point.
 
Posted by noah129 on :
 
same for me pennytrader im all in on this one if its gonna go ill be their and if this is going to the basement so be it. ill try a bit harder to space my posts out but then again if my writing is too offensive to some or just plain out illegible then you all have the right to do what i do just skip certain peoples posts.

i usually never skip anyones posts unless im absolutely sure that it is filled with info that i feel i dont need to know. i gladly except and appreciate any dd that anyone brings even if its nasty info about our little q.

i just want to thank whoever it was that brought and found out about the a/s increase.even though i was really unhappy about this news as investors we should know this info so thanx again even for the bad news guys.keep up the great work that so many of you do on this board i appreciate all qbidians.

qbidians consist in my mind of anyone who has any interest in qbid.even if they arent holding shares.if you post on qbid boards if you are a diehard long, if you are a basher who wants this to go down, if you are a hardcore christain anti gay person who wants all qbidians to go to hell, if you even read the qbid boards then you are a qbidian. hows that for a run on sentence hahaha. long live qbidians and qbidiots hehee. good luck to you all.
 
Posted by firefly on :
 
Hi all, Hoss close game last night. Noah you got my 5. MM I am an engineer. I have 7 days off until I start a new job. Hope all are healthy and happy. I will make my decision toward end of month,,need to look at financials now.
Q, keep rolling out.
 
Posted by noah129 on :
 
thanx firefly i appreciate the stars in one sense they are silly but they are fun. the only thing that bothers me about them is that it is possible if someone really doesnt like you to make many alias's and rate you poorly just to get your stars down.

but if someone is willing to do this then they are truly childish and if we put too much stock into our stars then maybe we are the children .but thanx again im going for my five stars maybe by then ill be able to open up a five star restaruant.hahaha. actually when qbid hits im going to start a horse ranch and maybe grow some kind of veggies or fruits.apples i think they are good for ya and hardy too.
 
Posted by Penny-Trader on :
 
i doesn't matter to me what your stars say on the board. I have my own star system and they are more accurate then anything on this board.

Noah your a 10 in my book.

Rod
 
Posted by firefly on :
 
Noah nice structure LOL. I agree stars are pretty silly. Take care and have fun.
 
Posted by QBID'n on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by noah129:
qbidians consist in my mind of anyone who has any interest in qbid.even if they arent holding shares.if you post on qbid boards if you are a diehard long, if you are a basher who wants this to go down, if you are a hardcore christain anti gay person who wants all qbidians to go to hell, if you even read the qbid boards then you are a qbidian. hows that for a run on sentence hahaha. long live qbidians and qbidiots hehee. good luck to you all.

..."hows that for a run on sentence"...hahaha oh Noah your hillarious sometimes. And seeing your spacing is almost like seeing you in a suit and tie after years of just khakis and a tee shirt. [Big Grin]

I've said it before and I'll say it again...I love your spirit.
 
Posted by noah129 on :
 
thanx guys i cant wait to meet many of you one day. qbid has a bunch of great investors and characters around here. i appreciate all your comments. sleep well all ill be around in the am to hear what ya'll have to say.

ut oh i think my hillbilly side is coming out. maybe its time to buy more qbid.
 
Posted by QBID'n on :
 
I second that Noah...I'll be putting in an order for my last million shares this week. Need to round off to 10M. [Big Grin]

At .0004 that would get my avg down to .0007 [Wink]
 
Posted by pennnies on :
 
Hey you guys should order your certs!!!

You will be able to use them as toilet paper pretty soon!!


[Eek!]
 
Posted by HossTrader on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Monopoly Money:
Keyboard extensions, lots of keyboard extensions

quote:
Originally posted by HossTrader:
[QUOTE]
How do you even type from that cross you keep putting yourself on? Get over it.

And if you take that personally, it isn't my fault [Smile]


LMAO I forgot to respond earlier btw. Good one! [Big Grin]
 
Posted by RNINALVNG on :
 
Noah....thanks. [Wink]
 
Posted by Marty on :
 
Knock...knock....Who's there? Nobody....nobody who? Nobody who listens.....
quote:
Originally posted by Marty:
A stock, is only as good as the company, and it's market/objectives, and is only as good as the management that runs it....
So,
A = business plan/companies market/objectves
(potential income) per year
B = obtainable market share (potentially, 5bill) per year
C = actual market share per year
D = debt/expenses per month (burn rate)
E = Gross revenue per year
F = Net revenue per year

So, if A = 5bill, then
B = 5000000000
C = companies shareof market...let's say 1%
1% of 5bill = 50000000
D = 1mill x 12 = 12mill (approximate burn rate, per month)
E = 12mill
F = 50000000 - 12000000 = 38000000

This leaves an unaudited income of
38mill per year (assuming 1%)

G = A/S (shares) = 50000000000 (assumed)
H = F / G = 38000000 / 50000000000 = 0.00076

H = 0.00076 per share, based on income

This doesn't take into account, other income, assets or potential market cap. You decide. (It's all congecture and hypothessis, and) JMHO, take it or leave it....GLTA...


 
Posted by Marty on :
 
Pertinent info should be on top of gibberish, babbling, personal contrives, etc.....

quote:
Originally posted by Marty:
Knock...knock....Who's there? Nobody....nobody who? Nobody who listens.....
quote:
Originally posted by Marty:
A stock, is only as good as the company, and it's market/objectives, and is only as good as the management that runs it....
So,
A = business plan/companies market/objectves
(potential income) per year
B = obtainable market share (potentially, 5bill) per year
C = actual market share per year
D = debt/expenses per month (burn rate)
E = Gross revenue per year
F = Net revenue per year

So, if A = 5bill, then
B = 5000000000
C = companies shareof market...let's say 1%
1% of 5bill = 50000000
D = 1mill x 12 = 12mill (approximate burn rate, per month)
E = 12mill
F = 50000000 - 12000000 = 38000000

This leaves an unaudited income of
38mill per year (assuming 1%)

G = A/S (shares) = 50000000000 (assumed)
H = F / G = 38000000 / 50000000000 = 0.00076

H = 0.00076 per share, based on income

This doesn't take into account, other income, assets or potential market cap. You decide. (It's all congecture and hypothessis, and) JMHO, take it or leave it....GLTA...



 
Posted by HossTrader on :
 
Hey Marty,
If you are simply dividing the income by the a/s, isn't that earnings per share? That number could still be well under what the company is worth. I don't know of any companies with a p/e of zero. If you were valuing it, what kind of multiplier do think would be appropriate?

If eps = .00076, then achieving even a p/e of 10 would mean the pps came up to .0076

(I know I am wording that screwy, but you know what I mean [Smile] )
 
Posted by Marty on :
 
ALL REAL companies trade at a p/e of mutiples of their earnings....this is a pink.....and just an observation....reality? If this was a REAL company on the REAL exchanges, it's p/e would be different....no?
 
Posted by Marty on :
 
and to top it off, if THEY would exibit their AUDIT, we would know....no? GL.... [Wink]
 
Posted by RNINALVNG on :
 
Marty, appreciate your posts...just got back in to town...not enough time to digest your post/numbers...personally...hope it's better...will decipher soon...thanks for your contributions.

BTW....81 degrees here today...what's it like in Jersey?
 
Posted by Marty on :
 
RNINALVNG Ummm...not quite that nice? LOL....I'm envious and going to FLA soon, (again) [Smile]
 
Posted by Marty on :
 
Off to hug my pillow....will check your comments manana~....GLTA
 
Posted by mjm2005 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by pennnies:
Hey you guys should order your certs!!!

You will be able to use them as toilet paper pretty soon!!


[Eek!]

har har har har har
 
Posted by mjm2005 on :
 
http://mail.qtelevision.com/

Hmmmmmm...
 
Posted by whizknock on :
 
This will be my last post here until Frank releases the audit!

I have posted here for several years & there are people here I like!

This information is for you to use & not a recomendation either way!

GZFX is in a serious uptrend which will continue because it's moving on anticipated knowledge of future disclosures concerning significant material events! Some of which has been evidenced in real time would be a partnership with Circutcity! This is not a flash in the pan!

I have never seen a better looking chart!


http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=8644733
 
Posted by Dustoff101 on :
 
Side Bar: Regarding personal attacks and childish behavior..
 
Posted by Bob Frey on :
 
Side Bar: Getting very tired of dealing with personal attacks and childish behavior on this thread.

The company and its stock please.
 
Posted by Dustoff101 on :
 
Side Bar: Regarding personal attacks and childish behavior..

Many of us are quilty of some mighty stupid behavior at times, and yes, even you Penny-trader, but we kept it in house, so to speak.

Hey, we are adults, good humor and intelligent banter is one of the priviliges that comes with that territory.

When it is abused? thats no good, and I am sure the adults would agree with that statement.

So, what I propose is sort of a truce.
We have an invasion of some mighty sick individuals swamping allstocks again.

They come in, sometimes with multible 5 star ratings and may only have one or two posts. We have all seen this, and it is obvious to us that sumpin does'nt smell right when this happens.

Or they just come in smoking! Making lured and vicious comments, while singling out what they may percieve, as the leaders for attack.

It can ruin a forum, and or a message board..

I want to bring to the attention of the adults around here that some very young and emotionaly immature folks may be seriously effected by these fights around here sometimes..We don't want to cause harm to folks, that we may not even realise or see that we are causing harm to ...No stock is worth causing someone undue pain that may cause a young person to do something that ends up in a tradgedy..Thankyou folks, for at least considering my words.
 
Posted by Wangdo on :
 
this has to be one of your best thought out and intelligent post this year.

quote:
Originally posted by Dustoff101:
Side Bar: Regarding personal attacks and childish behavior..

Many of us are quilty of some mighty stupid behavior at times, and yes, even you Penny-trader, but we kept it in house, so to speak.

Hey, we are adults, good humor and intelligent banter is one of the priviliges that comes with that territory.

When it is abused? thats no good, and I am sure the adults would agree with that statement.

So, what I propose is sort of a truce.
We have an invasion of some mighty sick individuals swamping allstocks again.

They come in, sometimes with multible 5 star ratings and may only have one or two posts. We have all seen this, and it is obvious to us that sumpin does'nt smell right when this happens.

Or they just come in smoking! Making lured and vicious comments, while singling out what they may percieve, as the leaders for attack.

It can ruin a forum, and or a message board..

I want to bring to the attention of the adults around here that some very young and emotionaly immature folks may be seriously effected by these fights around here sometimes..We don't want to cause harm to folks, that we may not even realise or see that we are causing harm to ...No stock is worth causing someone undue pain that may cause a young person to do something that ends up in a tradgedy..Thankyou folks, for at least considering my words.


 
Posted by Peaser01 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Marty:
A stock, is only as good as the company, and it's market/objectives, and is only as good as the management that runs it....
So,
A = business plan/companies market/objectves
(potential income) per year
B = obtainable market share (potentially, 5bill) per year
C = actual market share per year
D = debt/expenses per month (burn rate)
E = Gross revenue per year
F = Net revenue per year

So, if A = 5bill, then
B = 5000000000
C = companies shareof market...let's say 1%
1% of 5bill = 50000000
D = 1mill x 12 = 12mill (approximate burn rate, per month)
E = 12mill
F = 50000000 - 12000000 = 38000000

This leaves an unaudited income of
38mill per year (assuming 1%)

G = A/S (shares) = 50000000000 (assumed)
H = F / G = 38000000 / 50000000000 = 0.00076

H = 0.00076 per share, based on income

This doesn't take into account, other income, assets or potential market cap. You decide. (It's all congecture and hypothessis, and) JMHO, take it or leave it....GLTA...

This really makes a lot of sense. Thanks Marty.
 
Posted by Clyde_Crashcup on :
 
Full trading week - I expect a PR from Frank today regarding the audit. (just a thought)
 
Posted by Bigrod40 on :
 
More Exposure.....with all this exposure Frankie Boy should be running with it as in "AUDIT" [Embarrassed]

http://365gay.com/entertainment/tv/112805TV.htm
 
Posted by MillerTIME on :
 
premarket....

.0004x.0005
10x7
 
Posted by Ad astra on :
 
I too am not going to bother posting again until the audit comes out (or the stock moves north).

Too much frustration going on--and I completely understand given the low center of gravity the stock currently maintains.

Good luck to all.
 
Posted by davidjanas on :
 
if this aint the week its coming out somebody shoot me [Smile] lol
 
Posted by Jennifercd10 on :
 
careful what you ask for!
I too believe that this is the week. I think wee will see the audit and at least 2 new cities and... comcast!
 
Posted by noah129 on :
 
good morning jen lets get going on those cheesecakes ok hehehe. today im feeling like a blueberry with chocolate chunks. thanx hahaha.
 
Posted by HossTrader on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Marty:
ALL REAL companies trade at a p/e of mutiples of their earnings....this is a pink.....and just an observation....reality? If this was a REAL company on the REAL exchanges, it's p/e would be different....no?

LOL True. But I am looking long term and still believing it has that potential.
 
Posted by HossTrader on :
 
Also, using that logic. ANY method of valuation is useless! Which unfortunately might be even closer to true. :/
 
Posted by a4realguy on :
 
So far.... as usual.. SSDD
 
Posted by Jennifercd10 on :
 
Good morning noah...
blueberry with chocolate chunks in Las Vegas. I bet you'll change your order before we get there.
 
Posted by Bottomliner on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Dustoff101:
Side Bar: Regarding personal attacks and childish behavior...

Dusty
You have my total support for this. We may not always agree on issues but we should always agree to respect the opinions of others. Thanks for reminding us. [Smile]
 
Posted by Sam1959 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Wangdo:
this has to be one of your best thought out and intelligent post this year.

I agree. Good post Dustoff.
 
Posted by Sam1959 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Clyde_Crashcup:
Full trading week - I expect a PR from Frank today regarding the audit. (just a thought)

I hope you're right.
 
Posted by Sam1959 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by davidjanas:
if this aint the week its coming out somebody shoot me [Smile] lol

Good to see you again David!
 
Posted by Sam1959 on :
 
Just got a reply from Richard Brown on the audit.
__________________

Sam,


As an outsourced investor relations Co., I'm not privy to the day-to-day operations and or audit information .
That said I will forward your e-mail to management
.
Equity Relations, Inc.
Creating Synergy Between Company and Investor
Office: 617-314-7379
Email: Staff*equityrelations.com
Web: www.equityrelations.com
Please visit our website for company information and disclaimers
 
Posted by a4realguy on :
 
I don't consider that a reply...
 
Posted by Bottomliner on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by noah129:
good morning jen lets get going on those cheesecakes ok hehehe. today im feeling like a blueberry with chocolate chunks. thanx hahaha.

noah
I've been psycho-analyzing everyone based solely on their cheesecake requests, and my research says you are definitely ... well, maybe I should tell you privately. We don't want everyone flooding Jennifer with requests for the same type cheesecake you like. [Big Grin]
 
Posted by kaos on :
 
good morning everyone...its a brand new week...lets hope this will be the one.... [Big Grin]
 
Posted by Ligge on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Sam1959:
Just got a reply from Richard Brown on the audit.
__________________

Sam,


As an outsourced investor relations Co., I'm not privy to the day-to-day operations and or audit information .
That said I will forward your e-mail to management
.
Equity Relations, Inc.
Creating Synergy Between Company and Investor
Office: 617-314-7379
Email: Staff*equityrelations.com
Web: www.equityrelations.com
Please visit our website for company information and disclaimers

Email him back and ask him to define synergy because he sure isn't using his own tag line very well. He should do us all a favor and quit.
 
Posted by Bottomliner on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by a4realguy:
I don't consider that a reply...

realguy
It's a reply ... and better than no reply at all. Also, it's "probably" an honest one. Just not the one we'd all like to hear. So I guess the waiting continues. [Frown]
 
Posted by MillerTIME on :
 
Chart time....

http://tinyurl.com/8jj6h

This is a 2 year chart of Q, that includes the first run up, and then our steady downturn all the way down.

Look at the top indicator (money flow) and the bottom indicator (accumulation)

On the money flow, look at the green spiking compared all across 2 years and you see that if not now, it is close to breaking new highs with the amount of money being bought into QBID

interesting, then add to that the accumulation
The accumulation is on the bottom, and tell me what you see. The accumulation, i believe has now broken the all time high and in the past week it has been flying up telling us something.

The chart begs the all important question of, who is buying at alltime lows, and alltime lows in investor confidence, espically if Frank is raising the AS.

Just keep in mind, the best traders/investors are the ones that put big money in when the stocks confidence level is at lows and everybody is yelling to sell, thats when to buy.

Two questions:
WHO has bought 3-5 Billion shares at .0005 in the past 6 days

and.

WHO has sold them those shares at .0005 and WHY
 
Posted by HossTrader on :
 
That is what gets me MT. I understand why a lot of people keep saying dilution. But WHO keeps buying this stock??? I doubt there are any day traders buying into this now. So where are the trades coming from?
 
Posted by mjm2005 on :
 
Viacom looking for a controlling stake in a competitor? [Big Grin]
 
Posted by Doctoall on :
 
IMO the next PR will be related to the coverage that "Q" is doing (programming) for World Aids Day Dec/01/05. [Big Grin]
 
Posted by a4realguy on :
 
Why haven't we had any word regarding the audit being published? Frank said it would be available in the coming weeks... that was several weeks ago... what is the problem with conveying where we are in that process?
 
Posted by noah129 on :
 
patience.................................
 
Posted by CashCowMoo on :
 
that is the million dollar question which nobody has the answer to. not even our IR rep knows....anything at all about it! i feel shafted
 
Posted by polo1110 on :
 
BL, I sure as hell don't consider this a "reply." Richard is using two or three different replies over and over now. I just got one today, also. It is much more like an insult or a slap in the face than a reply. Richard Brown is a joke, as he knows nothing about the company, yet is in charge of investor relations? Was that Frank's brilliant idea to have a little puppet he could use as a buffer between himself and the investors? If Frank's email is really franko*qtelevision.com he is flat out ignoring emails from many investors. This is becoming a huge joke.


quote:
Originally posted by Bottomliner:
quote:
Originally posted by a4realguy:
I don't consider that a reply...

realguy
It's a reply ... and better than no reply at all. Also, it's "probably" an honest one. Just not the one we'd all like to hear. So I guess the waiting continues. [Frown]


 
Posted by Doctoall on :
 
World AIDS Day, Dec. 1, Programming Highlights (listed by time):

“Common Threads: Stories from the Quilt” (Logo, 7 AM & 5 PM ET/PT) In this Academy Award winning documentary narrated by Dustin Hoffman, squares of the AIDS quilt come to life as a diverse group of people celebrate the stories and lives of loved ones who died of AIDS-related causes.

“Brunch” (Q Television, 9 AM PT/12 PM ET) This live talk show will focus on the HIV/AIDS pandemic and feature discussions with medical professionals, politicians and activists .

“AIDS: A Pop Culture History” (VH1, 1:30 PM ET/PT) This VH1 News documentary follows the media’s reactions to AIDS. From the shock of Rock Hudson’s death to the acceptance and support of Magic Johnson’s announcement, we’ve come a long way.

“QTN World News” (Q Television, 4 PM PT/7 PM ET) A live update on medical achievements and the future outlook of HIV/AIDS.

“iThemba Hope” (Sundance Channel, 4 PM ET/PT) The Sinikithemba Choir's mission is to bring the world's attention to the more than 5 million South Africans who are HIV positive. The filmmakers follow Zinhle Thabethe, a 26-year-old HIV positive South African who travels with the choir to Boston for a performance at an international AIDS conference.

“On Q Live” (4:30 PM PT/7:30PM ET) The live studio show will focus on HIV/AIDS awareness and prevention.

“The Origins of AIDS” (Sundance Channel, 5 PM ET/PT) This documentary investigates a theory detailed in journalist Edward Hooper’s controversial book “The River,” addressing the possibility that the deadliest disease known to humankind came as a result of a risky, mass inoculation of an experimental polio vaccine during the late 1950s.

“Queer Edge” (Q Television, 6 PM PT/9 PM ET) Host Jack E. Jett observes World AIDS Day with a look at the HIV/AIDS pandemic.

“14 Million Dreams” (Sundance Channel, 6:45 PM ET/PT) An estimated 14 million children have been orphaned by AIDS in Sub-Saharan Africa. Giving faces and stories to this grim statistic, filmmaker Miles Roston presents interviews with five children from Kenya and Malawi who are making their way largely on their own, following the death of their parents.

“Orphans of Nkandla” (Cinemax, 7 PM ET/PT) This compelling documentary follows three families in rural Zululand, South Africa, to show how HIV/AIDS has affected the children.

“Tracking the Monster: Ashley Judd and India.Arie Confront AIDS in Africa” (VH1, 7:30 PM ET/PT) This VH1 News documentary chronicles two emotional journeys to Africa by Golden Globe nominee Ashley Judd and Grammy winner India.Arie. They travel to the front lines of the global fight against HIV/AIDS.

“Make it Real (to me)” (Sundance Channel, 8 PM ET/PT) Filmmaker Miles Roston updates the story of Kevin, a Kenyan AIDS orphan who was profiled in Roston’s 2003 documentary “14 Million Dreams.” An aspiring doctor who is now 16 years old on the eve of sexual maturity, Kevin has many questions about how to protect himself from AIDS.

“On the Frontlines of AIDS” (Discovery Channel, 8 PM ET/PT) Renowned journalist Sorious Samura works as an orderly in a hospital in Zambia, where the majority of the patients are HIV positive. After one month, Samura is left with the realization that for the war against HIV in Africa to be won, poverty, ignorance and African sexual attitudes have to be tackled head on.

“CBS News on Logo” (Logo, 9 PM ET/PT) In honor of World AIDS Day, CBS News on Logo delivers an in-depth report on AIDS and the latest health updates, studies and findings.

“Here to Remember” (here! TV, check listings) Hosted by Leslie Jordan (“Will & Grace,” “Sordid Lives”), this special includes a series of personal accounts from celebrities recounting personal tales of someone they’ve lost to AIDS.

MOVIES: “An Early Frost” (Logo, 1 PM ET/PT); “Angels in America” (Logo, 10 PM ET/PT); “The Greg Louganis Story” (Logo, 11 AM ET/PT); “Longtime Companion” (Logo, 9 AM & 7 PM ET/PT); “Our Sons” (Logo, 3 PM ET/PT); “Parting Glances” (here! TV, check listings).

©365Gay.com 2005
 
Posted by Bottomliner on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by polo1110:
BL, I sure as hell don't consider this a "reply."

polo
I wasn't challenging realguy's comment, and I certainly didn't intend to start an argument. I was just pointing out that a "reply" is a response to a comment or question. It may not be what we wanted to hear, but he did "reply".

The real question is why he responded as he did.
1) Is he "incompetent" as some people have suggested? (I find that hard to believe.)
2) Is he being told what to say about the audit and other pertinent QBID issues? (Very likely, since he works for Frank and has to satisfy his customers.)
3) Does he know more about the audit than he says? (Probably, but read #2 again.)
4) If he knows the answers to our questions, why does he say he doesn't? (Read #2 again.)

I am not trying to be a smart-azz about this. But I was a spokesman for a government agency once and found many ways to tell the newsmedia that I could not (or would not) answer their questions. My official answer to questions I was not allowed to answer was "No comment." But you can imagine how well that satisfied newspeople looking for a story. So sometimes I hid behind a mask of ignorance. When I shrugged and said I didn't know the answer, they assumed I was "incompetent" and went away. Gee, that sounds a lot like Richard's recent responses.

I am not defending Richard or Frank or their failure to tell us what we want to hear. I am just being realistic about a situation I cannot control. Believe me, I share your concerns, and I hate waiting in suspence as much as anyone. But tell me how to change that, and I will do what I can. [Frown]
 
Posted by Ad astra on :
 
Yeah yeah, said i wasnt going to post...but then i was thinking...

1. Q Television is a subsidiary of TMM. Has there ever been a mention that Q television is a 'WHOLLY-OWNED' subsidiary? If i'm not mistaken, there is a difference.

2. I was unable to pull up Triangle Multi Media on the California Secretary of State web page. Would it be a waste of time to file foreign corp status in Cali if they are operating out of Burbank? thoughts? opinions?

3. I also thought I read or heard on Con Call Frank mentioning the need to get FCC approval for the teleport (broadcast license?). I also checked the FCC web site and saw no application on behalf of TMM. Could someone verify I am doing this correctly?

Just trying to dig around a bit while waiting on the audit results.
 
Posted by polo1110 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Bottomliner:
The real question is why he responded as he did.

I answered this already. He is now using the same blanket answers for all questions that Direct TV and DISH Network are sending all of us. That is why I don't consider these "replies" in the first place. He did not sit down and write these answers. Someone took his generic answer and is using it to answer every question about QTN now.
 
Posted by polo1110 on :
 
Let's nto statrt the subsidiary debate again please. QTN is a wholly-owned subsidiary of TMM.

quote:
Originally posted by Ad astra:
Yeah yeah, said i wasnt going to post...but then i was thinking...

1. Q Television is a subsidiary of TMM. Has there ever been a mention that Q television is a 'WHOLLY-OWNED' subsidiary? If i'm not mistaken, there is a difference.

2. I was unable to pull up Triangle Multi Media on the California Secretary of State web page. Would it be a waste of time to file foreign corp status in Cali if they are operating out of Burbank? thoughts? opinions?

3. I also thought I read or heard on Con Call Frank mentioning the need to get FCC approval for the teleport (broadcast license?). I also checked the FCC web site and saw no application on behalf of TMM. Could someone verify I am doing this correctly?

Just trying to dig around a bit while waiting on the audit results.


 
Posted by Ad astra on :
 
Fair enough Polo, i'll stop...but mark that when we find out more regarding his 3rd statement on the Oct. 31 press release.
----------------------------
I would like to take a moment to highlight the important points of this audit:


1. Q Television will show its total asset base
2. Q Television will show its debt *** roughly 30% less than expected

3. Specific asset percentages, breakdowns and splits of Q Television Network and /or its parent, Triangle Multi Media
 
Posted by sidhartha on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Ad astra:
Yeah yeah, said i wasnt going to post...but then i was thinking...

1. Q Television is a subsidiary of TMM. Has there ever been a mention that Q television is a 'WHOLLY-OWNED' subsidiary? If i'm not mistaken, there is a difference.

2. I was unable to pull up Triangle Multi Media on the California Secretary of State web page. Would it be a waste of time to file foreign corp status in Cali if they are operating out of Burbank? thoughts? opinions?

3. I also thought I read or heard on Con Call Frank mentioning the need to get FCC approval for the teleport (broadcast license?). I also checked the FCC web site and saw no application on behalf of TMM. Could someone verify I am doing this correctly?

Just trying to dig around a bit while waiting on the audit results.

from IHUB intro page (show board info). It would be interesting to know who designed the web page for this board and/or provided the info.:

Welcome to the message board for TRIANGLE MULTI-MEDIA (TMM) LTD. INC. and its wholly owned subsidiary, "The Q TELEVISION NETWORK" (QTN).
TMM's Trading Symbol is QBID.

and

QBID INVESTOR RELATIONS:
Please call Richard Brown at 617-314-7379
or email him at Staff*EquityRelations.com.

Other:
TMM (QBID) Main Corporate Site: http://www.qbid.net
Shareholder's Hotline: 888-594-7766
General Information: 760-323-4455

QBID, via its wholly owned subsidiary "The Q Television Network (QTN)," IS the first U.S. broadcaster of 24/7, family oriented TV programming tailored for the Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual, and Transgendered (GLBT) Communities!
 
Posted by polo1110 on :
 
Sorry ad astra, I don't follow? I assume that below is the 3rd statement you are talking about, so I think I just misunderstood the "mark that when we find out more..." comment? Sorry I didn't understand what you meant ahead of time [Smile]

quote:
Originally posted by Ad astra:
Fair enough Polo, i'll stop...but mark that when we find out more regarding his 3rd statement on the Oct. 31 press release.
----------------------------
I would like to take a moment to highlight the important points of this audit:


1. Q Television will show its total asset base
2. Q Television will show its debt *** roughly 30% less than expected

3. Specific asset percentages, breakdowns and splits of Q Television Network and /or its parent, Triangle Multi Media


 
Posted by Clyde_Crashcup on :
 
Did you ever think that Richard and company wishes Frank would find another IR firm so they could quit dealing with the pink investors. I'm sure they have other companies that they represent and could live without TMM.
 
Posted by QBID'n on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Clyde_Crashcup:
Did you ever think that Richard and company wishes Frank would find another IR firm so they could quit dealing with the pink investors. I'm sure they have other companies that they represent and could live without TMM.

Good logic CC.

But I couldn't. [Big Grin]
 
Posted by Clyde_Crashcup on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by QBID'n:
quote:
Originally posted by Clyde_Crashcup:
Did you ever think that Richard and company wishes Frank would find another IR firm so they could quit dealing with the pink investors. I'm sure they have other companies that they represent and could live without TMM.

Good logic CC.

But I couldn't. [Big Grin]

I bet Frank is leaving Richard out on the cold as well as the investors.
 
Posted by MillerTIME on :
 
Monster dumping...

.0004x.0005
10x7

Volume = 702 M

Level II has not moved since open.
 
Posted by Got Q? on :
 
MT i like the chart post you made earlier. Do you think the breakout in money flow and accumulation is due to the falling pps or another factor?
 
Posted by King Crimson on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Ad astra:

2. I was unable to pull up Triangle Multi Media on the California Secretary of State web page. Would it be a waste of time to file foreign corp status in Cali if they are operating out of Burbank? thoughts? opinions?

it is still actve in ca...

http://kepler.ss.ca.gov/corpdata/ShowList
http://kepler.ss.ca.gov/corpdata/ShowAllList?QueryCorpNumber=C2618943
 
Posted by King Crimson on :
 
...that is q television network.....
 
Posted by Maestro232 on :
 
Grr...I was hoping for an audit before page 25
 
Posted by Ad astra on :
 
Sid and King-
thanks for the update. It's encouraging to know they have presence with the SoS in Cali.

Polo-a quick clarification on Frank's #3...i just wanted to be sure of the entire ownership structure of Q Television. Other than IHUB, has there been mention of it being WHOLLY owned? simply put, if QTN were spun off or sold, yes TMM shareholders would be compensated, but at what level?

If VC's (or any other type of Private Equity Fund) were 1/2 owners of The Q, then would it not mean then at sale, half of proceeds would go to VC's and the other half go to TMM?

Just a bunch of open-ended questions, I know...

But nothing else to do until we see an audit.
 
Posted by FatherOfTwo on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by MillerTIME:
Monster dumping...

.0004x.0005
10x7

Volume = 702 M

Level II has not moved since open.

Monster dumping.. to say the least!!!!!

0.0004 290000 OTO 12:14:14
0.0004 3000000 OTO 12:09:23
0.0004 9000000 OTO 12:09:23
0.0004 4000000 OTO 12:08:21
0.0004 9000000 OTO 12:08:21
0.0004 9000000 OTO 12:07:47
0.0004 9000000 OTO 12:07:47
0.0004 9000000 OTO 12:07:47
0.0004 4000000 OTO 12:07:47
0.0004 9000000 OTO 12:07:46
0.0004 9000000 OTO 12:07:46
0.0004 9000000 OTO 12:07:46
0.0004 4000000 OTO 12:07:45
0.0005 50000 OTO 12:07:43
0.0004 9000000 OTO 12:07:39
0.0004 1000000 OTO 12:07:22
0.0004 1000000 OTO 12:07:21
0.0004 9000000 OTO 12:07:14
0.0004 9000000 OTO 12:07:14
0.0004 9000000 OTO 12:07:12
0.0005 1320000 OTO 12:05:22
0.0004 15000 OTO 12:03:27
0.0005 975000 OTO 12:02:13
0.0004 700000 OTO 11:57:45
0.0004 200000 OTO 11:54:16
0.0004 5000000 OTO 11:52:25
0.0004 9000000 OTO 11:52:21
0.0004 9000000 OTO 11:52:21
0.0004 9000000 OTO 11:52:21
0.0004 9000000 OTO 11:52:19
0.0004 9000000 OTO 11:52:05
0.0004 9000000 OTO 11:52:01
0.0004 9000000 OTO 11:51:59
0.0004 9000000 OTO 11:50:18
0.0005 150000 OTO 11:48:53
0.0004 4000000 OTO 11:44:29
0.0004 9000000 OTO 11:44:28
0.0004 9000000 OTO 11:44:24
0.0004 9000000 OTO 11:44:20
0.0004 9000000 OTO 11:44:12
0.0004 5000000 OTO 11:43:40
0.0004 5000000 OTO 11:43:17
0.0004 5000000 OTO 11:43:16
0.0004 5000000 OTO 11:42:52
0.0004 5000000 OTO 11:42:51
0.0004 1050000 OTO 11:41:22
0.0004 5000000 OTO 11:40:52
0.0004 5000000 OTO 11:40:14
0.0004 300000 OTO 11:39:43
0.0005 550000 OTO 11:33:58
0.0004 500000 OTO 11:29:44
0.0005 503610 OTO 11:29:44
0.0004 1000000 OTO 11:29:44
0.0004 4500000 OTO 11:27:49
 
Posted by Maestro232 on :
 
Why the dumping?
 
Posted by MillerTIME on :
 
no doubt monster selling....

No change in level II...

.0004x.0005
10x7

Volume = 1.07B
 
Posted by Dew-it on :
 
(((scratching head))) [Confused]

last week it was all buys and bid/ask did not move. Today it is all sells and the ask/bid still does not move. what the hec is going on?
 
Posted by FatherOfTwo on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Maestro232:
Why the dumping?

Because Frank sold Billions of restricted shares at .0001 per share to build a film library and to get initial funding to get the ball rolling.

Now that the restricted shares are mature, they are free to sell them (and they have been since about .0050+), which equates to huge profits to the restricted share holders.
 
Posted by MillerTIME on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Dew-it:
(((scratching head))) [Confused]

last week it was all buys and bid/ask did not move. Today it is all sells and the ask/bid still does not move. what the hec is going on?

LMAO, im beginning to think that the MM are some how shorting at the top, and buying back in at the bottom. .0005 short, .0004 cover. 25% profit? on 1B shares is pretty good.
 
Posted by mydream1 on :
 
Like inside transaction.
 
Posted by GatorMan on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Ad astra:
Sid and King-
thanks for the update. It's encouraging to know they have presence with the SoS in Cali.

Polo-a quick clarification on Frank's #3...i just wanted to be sure of the entire ownership structure of Q Television. Other than IHUB, has there been mention of it being WHOLLY owned? simply put, if QTN were spun off or sold, yes TMM shareholders would be compensated, but at what level?

If VC's (or any other type of Private Equity Fund) were 1/2 owners of The Q, then would it not mean then at sale, half of proceeds would go to VC's and the other half go to TMM?

Just a bunch of open-ended questions, I know...

But nothing else to do until we see an audit.

If QTN were spun off I'd guess we'd get stock in the new company at the ratio we currently own (at the time of spin-off). Frank, we all know, holds 53% of the stock so he would get 53% of the stock in the new company and we would all split the remaining 47%. If QTN were sold for cash then Triangle would get the cash and it would be up to Frank what to do with it but if given as dividends the split should be the same as above.

Now, the real question in my mind is what the preferred shares Frank owns entitles him to. We don't know what rights they have and those rights might be devastating to us. For example, and I don't want to start rumors as I don't know what the rights are, they could spell out a guaranteed buy-back price that has to be settled before any money goes to the common share holders. Again, this is just an example and I will be the first to admit I don't know what latitude is given when creating preferred shares. I've seen them have guaranteed dividends, multiple votes per share, and conversation rations to common stock. I'm guessing that Franks preferred have at least multiple votes per share.
 
Posted by Dew-it on :
 
you think FRAN, HDSN and DOMS sitting on 1000000 size on bid/ask have something to do with it?

quote:
Originally posted by MillerTIME:
quote:
Originally posted by Dew-it:
(((scratching head))) [Confused]

last week it was all buys and bid/ask did not move. Today it is all sells and the ask/bid still does not move. what the hec is going on?

LMAO, im beginning to think that the MM are some how shorting at the top, and buying back in at the bottom. .0005 short, .0004 cover. 25% profit? on 1B shares is pretty good.

 
Posted by Jennifercd10 on :
 
Something smells of manipulation, a 30m then a 39m and 11 minutes later a 69m. These are not usual nnumbers.
 
Posted by Peaser01 on :
 
Has anyone received a DVD yet? I'm guessing no.
 
Posted by Maestro232 on :
 
Something is bothering me greatly....

If Frank's kids have the mature restricted shares and are selling them to make profits, why the frick are they selling them now if Frank is guranteeing that this stock is going to kick booty very shortly?

Do they know something that we do not? Is he stalling the audit so his kids can finish making their money before he dumps the bad news on us and we're screwed? I REALLY DOUBT IT! This company is continuing in success in every avenue ACCEPT it's stock value. What the heck is going on for real?!?!?
 
Posted by Sam1959 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Clyde_Crashcup:
I bet Frank is leaving Richard out on the cold as well as the investors. [/QB]

That is what I think too; that way Richard doesn't have to lie.
 
Posted by GatorMan on :
 
OK, I think I was a little wrong in my assessment that preferred stock can have any rights attached. It seems that the rights may be limited, but I can still see how Frank could manipulate things such that the preferred stock gets way more than the 53% ownership claimed.

Here are some useful links for preferred stock:

http://www.investorwords.com/3778/preferred_stock.html

http://beginnersinvest.about.com/cs/newinvestors/a/091602a.html

If Franks stock were cumulative preferred with voting rights it would be very easy to set the dividend such that it could eventually accumulate to whatever QTN would sell for. In that case if QTN is sold off and the preferred dividends are caught up then there may be nothing left. Let's hope this is not what is going on with the preferred.

If anyone needs a question to ask Frank (davidjanas?) it would be "What are the exact terms of the preferred stock? What is the guaranteed dividend rate? Is it cumulative? If so, how much is currently owed? How many shares are issued? What are the voting rights? What are the conversion rights?"
 
Posted by Peaser01 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Maestro232:
Something is bothering me greatly....

If Frank's kids have the mature restricted shares and are selling them to make profits, why the frick are they selling them now if Frank is guranteeing that this stock is going to kick booty very shortly?

Do they know something that we do not? Is he stalling the audit so his kids can finish making their money before he dumps the bad news on us and we're screwed? I REALLY DOUBT IT! This company is continuing in success in every avenue ACCEPT it's stock value. What the heck is going on for real?!?!?

Interesting point. Could be possible. We'll probably never know unless there is some type of investigation or something.
 
Posted by pennnies on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by pennnies:
Hey you guys should order your certs!!!

You will be able to use them as toilet paper pretty soon!!


[Eek!]

LMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
Posted by pappy on :
 
1 billion shares traded already.
 
Posted by imakmony2005 on :
 
SELL IT FRANKIE.
 
Posted by King Crimson on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Ad astra:
...i just wanted to be sure of the entire ownership structure of Q Television

there are 3 corps...

TRIANGLE MULTIMEDIA LIMITED --ticker symbol QBID or QBID.pk
http://www.secstate.wa.gov/corps/search_detail.aspx?name=TRIANGLE+MULTIMEDIA+LIMITED&ubi=601047757

Q TELEVISION NETWORK, INC. --"affiliate" or "wholly-owned subsidiary"
http://www.secstate.wa.gov/corps/search_detail.aspx?name=Q+TELEVISION+NETWORK%2c+INC.&ubi=602391767

...and in default since 11/1/05 (list of officers due 10/31/05)....
TRIANGLE TELEVISION NETWORK, INC (nv)
https://esos.state.nv.us/SOSServices/AnonymousAccess/CorpSearch/CorpDetails.aspx?CorpID=462911
 
Posted by Clyde_Crashcup on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by MillerTIME:
Monster dumping...

.0004x.0005
10x7

Volume = 702 M

Level II has not moved since open.

Somebody knows somethings up.
 
Posted by pennnies on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Clyde_Crashcup:
quote:
Originally posted by MillerTIME:
Monster dumping...

.0004x.0005
10x7

Volume = 702 M

Level II has not moved since open.

Somebody knows somethings up.
Yeah it's called get out while you still can!
 
Posted by FatherOfTwo on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by imakmony2005:
SELL IT FRANKIE.

Frankie sold these shares 1+ years ago.... it is the restricted shareholders doing the selling!

And just think... all the other restricted shares that he issued will hit the market in another 6 months - 1 year... Any momentum or increase will only be brought right back down to these levels!

This one is stuck at .0004 - .0005 until all the restricted shares are absorbed into the float. Then, it could drop lower when everyone here gets tired of waiting and begins to sell for a loss!
 
Posted by Maestro232 on :
 
you mean "Somebody knows something is DOWN!"
 
Posted by johnny14511 on :
 
FRANK SUCKS $&#*
 
Posted by mjm2005 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Peaser01:
Has anyone received a DVD yet? I'm guessing no.

I have a feeling news of that would be all over the boards...if someone had...
 
Posted by Clyde_Crashcup on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Maestro232:
you mean "Somebody knows something is DOWN!"

You're right.

Hey DJ - have you talked to Frank? Let us know what's going to happen this week.
 
Posted by DIGDOUGH on :
 
I got a reply from Richard the IR guy also. As far as i'm concerned he's just a buffer for Weiner.
It seems like everything Frank does or says is some kind of smoke screen, or a temporary pacifier so Frank can feel like the biggest hustler on the block.
 
Posted by Ad astra on :
 
...and in default since 11/1/05 (list of officers due 10/31/05)....
TRIANGLE TELEVISION NETWORK, INC (nv)
https://esos.state.nv.us/SOSServices/AnonymousAccess/CorpSearch/CorpDetails.aspx?CorpID=462911

Thanks King. Well since this corp is in default since 11/1/05, that isnt the one making any deals because it does not have the authority to do so--at least after 11/1/05.
 
Posted by Ad astra on :
 
Anyone have any luck with the FCC application? Did i read that correctly that Frank was currently filing? Or did I get the conference call wrong?
 
Posted by Clyde_Crashcup on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Ad astra:
...and in default since 11/1/05 (list of officers due 10/31/05)....
TRIANGLE TELEVISION NETWORK, INC (nv)
https://esos.state.nv.us/SOSServices/AnonymousAccess/CorpSearch/CorpDetails.aspx?CorpID=462911

Thanks King. Well since this corp is in default since 11/1/05, that isnt the one making any deals because it does not have the authority to do so--at least after 11/1/05.

So is this the first time anyone has heard of this? First for me (I think) What's Frank up to?
 
Posted by Jennifercd10 on :
 
Q has been proving itself daily by its programming and expansion. NYC on 2 carriers says a lot about the varicosity of Q. So goes NYC so goes the nation. IMO we are going to see many other regions carrying Q in the very near future. Comcast is the biggest and some twice the size of TW, that is, if memory serves me right. Q has become a proven product. What controversy there was for Q has all but vanished and their product is desirous in the industry. Comcast will not want to be left in the dust on this one. This is a very competitive business and none of the carriers will cede any territory or product to another.
 
Posted by MillerTIME on :
 
Interesting point brought up by another board is that Frank may have raised the AS to buy out the Firestone contract. he said they were going to do this, but it was going to cost money.

Another possiblity i have heard is Mary Hartman, buying a clean shell, money for funding, for Frank to regain majority ownership.
 
Posted by DIGDOUGH on :
 
Frank has proved that he has people reading these boards. I could tell when he sent Richard to jump down somebody's throat over the aids thing that scared the hell out of Frank.
I don't know what the problem was. Was it just that his ass was in the sling instead of ours for a change?
FRANK WEEKS ARE WEEKS, WE'RE WORKING ON A MONTH NOW.
 
Posted by Peaser01 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Ad astra:
...and in default since 11/1/05 (list of officers due 10/31/05)....
TRIANGLE TELEVISION NETWORK, INC (nv)
https://esos.state.nv.us/SOSServices/AnonymousAccess/CorpSearch/CorpDetails.aspx?CorpID=462911

Thanks King. Well since this corp is in default since 11/1/05, that isnt the one making any deals because it does not have the authority to do so--at least after 11/1/05.

Ouch, anyone notice this was in Nevada? Not good. Many stock scams have come out of Nevada.
 
Posted by Ad astra on :
 
1.3 billion. WOW.

One question, however. From the L2's that some folks post here and on other boards, one can see the massive selling.

BUT

The stock has traded consistently in the .0004-.0005 range the last month or so...doesnt someone have to be buying as much as is being sold to keep the price from sinking down to .0001?

Thanks for any input.
 
Posted by MillerTIME on :
 
Top 11 Volume days in QBIDS history...

8/17/2005 1,135,825,152
2/4/2004 1,187,103,616
2/11/2004 1,352,267,648
4/15/2004 1,436,485,120
11/18/2005 1,511,399,808
4/13/2004 1,567,453,184
3/21/2005 1,578,814,976
11/23/2005 1,590,359,040
5/11/2004 1,623,194,752
4/14/2004 1,825,717,760
2/10/2004 2,147,483,648
 
Posted by Sam1959 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Maestro232:
Something is bothering me greatly....

If Frank's kids have the mature restricted shares and are selling them to make profits, why the frick are they selling them now if Frank is guranteeing that this stock is going to kick booty very shortly?

I don't think Frank's kids are holding mature restricted shares; those are held by the entities that Frank purchased the film library, etc. from. Frank’s kids are supposed to be holding preferred shares, but as I recall, some of them were still common shares and had not all been converted to preferred shares as of the date of the most recent conference call.
 
Posted by Dew-it on :
 
Geeze! I can't believe we have not down-ticked already with all dumping going on. Volume is 1.4B and probably 80-85% has been dumps..
 
Posted by Numa on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Jennifercd10:
Q has been proving itself daily by its programming and expansion. NYC on 2 carriers says a lot about the varicosity of Q. So goes NYC so goes the nation. IMO we are going to see many other regions carrying Q in the very near future. Comcast is the biggest and some twice the size of TW, that is, if memory serves me right. Q has become a proven product. What controversy there was for Q has all but vanished and their product is desirous in the industry. Comcast will not want to be left in the dust on this one. This is a very competitive business and none of the carriers will cede any territory or product to another.

While I don't doubt the eventual success of the Q television Network, what will it mean to our shares?

I mean, really, that's what we're here for, right?
 
Posted by Dew-it on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Numa:
quote:
Originally posted by Jennifercd10:
Q has been proving itself daily by its programming and expansion. NYC on 2 carriers says a lot about the varicosity of Q. So goes NYC so goes the nation. IMO we are going to see many other regions carrying Q in the very near future. Comcast is the biggest and some twice the size of TW, that is, if memory serves me right. Q has become a proven product. What controversy there was for Q has all but vanished and their product is desirous in the industry. Comcast will not want to be left in the dust on this one. This is a very competitive business and none of the carriers will cede any territory or product to another.

While I don't doubt the eventual success of the Q television Network, what will it mean to our shares?

I mean, really, that's what we're here for, right?

DITTO!
 
Posted by MillerTIME on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Dew-it:
Geeze! I can't believe we have not down-ticked already with all dumping going on. Volume is 1.4B and probably 80-85% has been dumps..

I give up on trading QBID.
1.4B in volume
1.1B probably sold at the bid.
No movement on the bid.

lol
 
Posted by DIGDOUGH on :
 
Jen, this may all be true, nonetheless I would still like to experince some factual investor input from mgmt. I'm not the one who has 53% of the stock no matter what happens. How do I or you know that we are going to reap anything from Q's success?

quote:
Originally posted by Jennifercd10:
Q has been proving itself daily by its programming and expansion. NYC on 2 carriers says a lot about the varicosity of Q. So goes NYC so goes the nation. IMO we are going to see many other regions carrying Q in the very near future. Comcast is the biggest and some twice the size of TW, that is, if memory serves me right. Q has become a proven product. What controversy there was for Q has all but vanished and their product is desirous in the industry. Comcast will not want to be left in the dust on this one. This is a very competitive business and none of the carriers will cede any territory or product to another.


 
Posted by HossTrader on :
 
I don't think ANYONE has a clue as to what is fully happening right now.
If it were just dilution we would have downticked.
Someone out there is buying this stuff up though.
 
Posted by GatorMan on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Jennifercd10:
Q has been proving itself daily by its programming and expansion. NYC on 2 carriers says a lot about the varicosity of Q. So goes NYC so goes the nation. IMO we are going to see many other regions carrying Q in the very near future. Comcast is the biggest and some twice the size of TW, that is, if memory serves me right. Q has become a proven product. What controversy there was for Q has all but vanished and their product is desirous in the industry. Comcast will not want to be left in the dust on this one. This is a very competitive business and none of the carriers will cede any territory or product to another.

I think there is no question anymore that QTN is growing and has "proven" itself. I agree that it's only a matter of time until it is carried on Comcast and Dish. The real issue these days is what the hell is going on internally within the company. How is the stock structure changing, where's the cash coming from and going to? In short, all the things a proper audit would show. When our concerns are brought to Frank the only answer we seem to get, if one is even given, is "everything is great", "more information is coming within weeks", or in general "trust me". "Trust me" just doesn't work in the real investment world. Only in the pink sheet world. IMO if you want to be a legitimate company you have to prove what you are saying with audited financials. If you want to move to the big boards at some point you need to start acting like a big board company. My fear is that there is something going on that in the long run will enrich Frank and leave the rest of us holding the bag. My fears may be unfounded but the only way to know for sure, is with a complete, audited financial statement.

Do it NOW Frank!
 
Posted by MillerTIME on :
 
COMTEX) B: www.****************: Market Gainer Updates Coverage for Q Tel
vision Network (Triangle Multimedia) ( M2 PRESSWIRE )
B: www.****************: Market Gainer Updates Coverage for Q Television Network
(Triangle Multimedia) ( M2 PRESSWIRE )

Nov 28, 2005 (M2 PRESSWIRE via COMTEX) -- Market Gainer, the fastest growing
online financial newsletter, focuses on identifying companies that for various
reasons have not performed well. These companies are trading down on the day but
the decrease in share price may not necessarily make them a poor prospect for
investment. In many instances the fundamentals of a company could still be
solid.

Market Gainer seeks to inform its subscribers of the details surrounding the
decrease in value of Q Television Network (OTCPK:QBID), a television network
that features television programming for the gay and lesbian community,
including live & interactive content every weeknight, plus sports, information
and entertainment.

Shares for the television network slid downward today, as individual share
prices decreased by 20 percent. Shares traded $.0001 lower than Friday's close,
at $.0004 per share, with a trading volume of 702 million shares.

The decrease came in contrast to the duo announcements released by the network
today.

Q Television Network today announced that it has entered into an affiliate
agreement with Selectv, which will become the exclusive satellite provider of
QTN programming throughout Australia and New Zealand. As a result of this
agreement, the programming will be available to roughly 10 million potential
additional households. Selectv is the network's first international distribution
deal. QTN began firming up Selectv launch details during the recent MIPCOM,
where executives pitched the network's lineup of original GLBT shows.

"This is an incredibly exciting move for us," said Carol Hinnant, QTN Vice
President, Affiliate Sales & Marketing. "Selectv has embarked on a mission to
deliver...........

To view the full Market Gainer report on Q Television Network, please visit
www.**************** for a complimentary subscription to the newest and most
exciting online financial newsletter on the market. No Credit Card information
needed.

The Financial Information and Financial Content provided by **************** is
for informational purposes only and should not be used or construed as an offer
to sell, a solicitation of an offer to buy, or endorsement, recommendations, or
sponsorship of any company or security by ****************. You acknowledge and
agree that any request for information is unsolicited and shall neither
constitute nor be construed as investment advice by **************** to you. It
is strongly recommended that you seek outside advice from a qualified securities
professional prior to making any securities investment. **************** does
not provide or guarantee any legal, tax, or accounting advice or advice
regarding the suitability, profitability, or potential value of any particular
investment, security, or informational source.

All material herein was prepared by based upon information believed to be
reliable. The information contained herein is not guaranteed by Market Gainer to
be accurate, and should not be considered to be all-inclusive. The companies
that are discussed in this opinion have not approved the statements made in this
opinion. This opinion contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and
uncertainties. This material is for informational purposes only and should not
be construed as an offer or solicitation of an offer to buy or sell securities.
Market Gainer is not a licensed broker, broker dealer, market maker, investment
banker, investment advisor, analyst or underwriter. Please consult a broker
before purchasing or selling any securities viewed on or mentioned herein.

This release contains "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of Section
27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended and such forward-looking statements are made
pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation
Reform Act of 1995. "Forward-looking statements" describe future expectations,
plans, results, or strategies and are generally preceded by words such as "may",
"future", "plan" or "planned", "will" or "should", "expected," "anticipates",
"draft", "eventually" or "projected". You are cautioned that such statements are
subject to a multitude of risks and uncertainties that could cause future
circumstances, events, or results to differ materially from those projected in
the forward-looking statements, including the risks that actual results may
differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements as a
result of various factors, and other risks identified in a companies' annual
report on Form 10-K or 10-KSB and other filings made by such company with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.

M2 Communications Ltd disclaims all liability for information provided within M2
PressWIRE. Data supplied by named party/parties. Further information on M2
PressWIRE can be obtained at http://www.presswire.net on the world wide web.
Inquiries to info*m2.com.


(C)1994-2005 M2 COMMUNICATIONS LTD

-0-


*** end of story ***
 
Posted by Peaser01 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by GatorMan:
quote:
Originally posted by Jennifercd10:
Q has been proving itself daily by its programming and expansion. NYC on 2 carriers says a lot about the varicosity of Q. So goes NYC so goes the nation. IMO we are going to see many other regions carrying Q in the very near future. Comcast is the biggest and some twice the size of TW, that is, if memory serves me right. Q has become a proven product. What controversy there was for Q has all but vanished and their product is desirous in the industry. Comcast will not want to be left in the dust on this one. This is a very competitive business and none of the carriers will cede any territory or product to another.

I think there is no question anymore that QTN is growing and has "proven" itself. I agree that it's only a matter of time until it is carried on Comcast and Dish. The real issue these days is what the hell is going on internally within the company. How is the stock structure changing, where's the cash coming from and going to? In short, all the things a proper audit would show. When our concerns are brought to Frank the only answer we seem to get, if one is even given, is "everything is great", "more information is coming within weeks", or in general "trust me". "Trust me" just doesn't work in the real investment world. Only in the pink sheet world. IMO if you want to be a legitimate company you have to prove what you are saying with audited financials. If you want to move to the big boards at some point you need to start acting like a big board company. My fear is that there is something going on that in the long run will enrich Frank and leave the rest of us holding the bag. My fears may be unfounded but the only way to know for sure, is with a complete, audited financial statement.

Do it NOW Frank!

Complete is the key word too. As the share price comes down, the audit IMHO will probably be released 6 months or so later, in the meantime what happenned in the unaudited 6 months when the price kept coming down?
 
Posted by DIGDOUGH on :
 
What if Viacom or some other big broadcasting company is buying Q shares by the billions at these prices. It would seem that when buy out time came, they just show that they already own a third of the company for almost nothing and only have to pay for the small remainder. I don't know what could be stopping them. Is that going to define a big buy out? [Confused]
 
Posted by MillerTIME on :
 
First change in level II...

.0004x.0005
9x8

Volume = 1.475B
 
Posted by Ad astra on :
 
What if Viacom or some other big broadcasting company is buying Q shares by the billions at these prices. It would seem that when buy out time came, they just show that they already own a third of the company for almost nothing and only have to pay for the small remainder. I don't know what could be stopping them. Is that going to define a big buy out?
--------
Dig, if Frank does control 53%, he could charge any potential suitor as much money as he wanted for the share that would tip the balance. Be it .05 or 5 billion.
 
Posted by trade04 on :
 
this is a dog with fleas
 
Posted by Peaser01 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by MillerTIME:
COMTEX) B: www.****************: Market Gainer Updates Coverage for Q Tel
vision Network (Triangle Multimedia) ( M2 PRESSWIRE )
B: www.****************: Market Gainer Updates Coverage for Q Television Network
(Triangle Multimedia) ( M2 PRESSWIRE )

Nov 28, 2005 (M2 PRESSWIRE via COMTEX) -- Market Gainer, the fastest growing
online financial newsletter, focuses on identifying companies that for various
reasons have not performed well. These companies are trading down on the day but
the decrease in share price may not necessarily make them a poor prospect for
investment. In many instances the fundamentals of a company could still be
solid.

Market Gainer seeks to inform its subscribers of the details surrounding the
decrease in value of Q Television Network (OTCPK:QBID), a television network
that features television programming for the gay and lesbian community,
including live & interactive content every weeknight, plus sports, information
and entertainment.

Shares for the television network slid downward today, as individual share
prices decreased by 20 percent. Shares traded $.0001 lower than Friday's close,
at $.0004 per share, with a trading volume of 702 million shares.

The decrease came in contrast to the duo announcements released by the network
today.

Q Television Network today announced that it has entered into an affiliate
agreement with Selectv, which will become the exclusive satellite provider of
QTN programming throughout Australia and New Zealand. As a result of this
agreement, the programming will be available to roughly 10 million potential
additional households. Selectv is the network's first international distribution
deal. QTN began firming up Selectv launch details during the recent MIPCOM,
where executives pitched the network's lineup of original GLBT shows.

"This is an incredibly exciting move for us," said Carol Hinnant, QTN Vice
President, Affiliate Sales & Marketing. "Selectv has embarked on a mission to
deliver...........

To view the full Market Gainer report on Q Television Network, please visit
www.**************** for a complimentary subscription to the newest and most
exciting online financial newsletter on the market. No Credit Card information
needed.

The Financial Information and Financial Content provided by **************** is
for informational purposes only and should not be used or construed as an offer
to sell, a solicitation of an offer to buy, or endorsement, recommendations, or
sponsorship of any company or security by ****************. You acknowledge and
agree that any request for information is unsolicited and shall neither
constitute nor be construed as investment advice by **************** to you. It
is strongly recommended that you seek outside advice from a qualified securities
professional prior to making any securities investment. **************** does
not provide or guarantee any legal, tax, or accounting advice or advice
regarding the suitability, profitability, or potential value of any particular
investment, security, or informational source.

All material herein was prepared by based upon information believed to be
reliable. The information contained herein is not guaranteed by Market Gainer to
be accurate, and should not be considered to be all-inclusive. The companies
that are discussed in this opinion have not approved the statements made in this
opinion. This opinion contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and
uncertainties. This material is for informational purposes only and should not
be construed as an offer or solicitation of an offer to buy or sell securities.
Market Gainer is not a licensed broker, broker dealer, market maker, investment
banker, investment advisor, analyst or underwriter. Please consult a broker
before purchasing or selling any securities viewed on or mentioned herein.

This release contains "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of Section
27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended and such forward-looking statements are made
pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation
Reform Act of 1995. "Forward-looking statements" describe future expectations,
plans, results, or strategies and are generally preceded by words such as "may",
"future", "plan" or "planned", "will" or "should", "expected," "anticipates",
"draft", "eventually" or "projected". You are cautioned that such statements are
subject to a multitude of risks and uncertainties that could cause future
circumstances, events, or results to differ materially from those projected in
the forward-looking statements, including the risks that actual results may
differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements as a
result of various factors, and other risks identified in a companies' annual
report on Form 10-K or 10-KSB and other filings made by such company with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.

M2 Communications Ltd disclaims all liability for information provided within M2
PressWIRE. Data supplied by named party/parties. Further information on M2
PressWIRE can be obtained at http://www.presswire.net on the world wide web.
Inquiries to info*m2.com.


(C)1994-2005 M2 COMMUNICATIONS LTD

-0-


*** end of story ***

A little help here please. Is market gainer one of the paid pumpers that companies pay to inform shareholders of their company?
 
Posted by DIGDOUGH on :
 
MT, sounds as though Market Gainer is as confused as I am.
 
Posted by CashCowMoo on :
 
this is so odd....hey when were people promised those investors DVDs? were these things ever made i thought they were going to mailed out in october. anyone here order one and if you did what was the date you were told?
 
Posted by MillerTIME on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by DIGDOUGH:
MT, sounds as though Market Gainer is as confused as I am.

LOL probably, i didnt really read it, because as peaser says, this is probably just a paid pump by QBID. who knows these day, im so numb to this stock at this point i just laugh!

RS bring it on!
Bankruptcy, is that all you got?
Class action lawsuit, now your talkin!

LMAO, sorry guys, just a little insight into how numb i am. Like were talking 1.5B shares sold at the bid today and 1 MM moves off bid, give me a break.
 
Posted by DIGDOUGH on :
 
Cash, thats one of the things that kills me about these guys. They say all kinds of sh1t, but when it time to show their hand they flip the table over in your lap and head for the door.
The DVD is way way over due and the only substitutue for it are lots of excuses.


quote:
Originally posted by CashCowMoo:
this is so odd....hey when were people promised those investors DVDs? were these things ever made i thought they were going to mailed out in october. anyone here order one and if you did what was the date you were told?


 
Posted by pappy on :
 
If this company is being built to sell, would you build it different than if you were going to keep it.
I thought Frank said we get paid when it is sold?
 
Posted by MillerTIME on :
 
if anybody cares...

an excerpt from the marketgainer PR.

[excerpt]
The companies
that are discussed in this opinion have not approved the statements made in this
opinion
 
Posted by CashCowMoo on :
 
put my sell order in for 848,500 shares at .0005. lost big on this one guys....going to put it into GZFX, at .024 and then sell at .o4 and then buy back into Q at .0004.
 
Posted by mjm2005 on :
 
Where is the audit?
 
Posted by MillerTIME on :
 
I really dont give two shi*s about the DVD. Give me a break, dont produce the friggen thing. 2,000 requests for it, at $10 a DVD, and were talkin more dilution. Forget the friggen thing.

Only problem is it is one more thing they promise but dont follow thru with, so i think the lie is so big now that they have to create a DVD.
 
Posted by Dew-it on :
 
exactly!!!

quote:
Originally posted by MillerTIME:
I really dont give two shi*s about the DVD. Give me a break, dont produce the friggen thing. 2,000 requests for it, at $10 a DVD, and were talkin more dilution. Forget the friggen thing.

Only problem is it is one more thing they promise but dont follow thru with, so i think the lie is so big now that they have to create a DVD.


 
Posted by pappy on :
 
When this co sells what do we get?
 
Posted by mjm2005 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by CashCowMoo:
put my sell order in for 848,500 shares at .0005. lost big on this one guys....going to put it into GZFX, at .024 and then sell at .o4 and then buy back into Q at .0004.

I was thinking about doing exactly that...
 
Posted by mjm2005 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by mjm2005:
quote:
Originally posted by CashCowMoo:
put my sell order in for 848,500 shares at .0005. lost big on this one guys....going to put it into GZFX, at .024 and then sell at .o4 and then buy back into Q at .0004.

I was thinking about doing exactly that...
Any guesses as to how long you think the sell order will take to fill?
 
Posted by mjm2005 on :
 
Did someone already post the article listed on 365gay.com???

The one about World AIDS Day---
http://www.365gay.com/entertainment/tv/112805TV.htm
 
Posted by Ad astra on :
 
Luckily (or not) my buy-in avg. is .00072 so I'm here until we (hopefully) see an uptrend.
 
Posted by MillerTIME on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by mjm2005:
quote:
Originally posted by mjm2005:
quote:
Originally posted by CashCowMoo:
put my sell order in for 848,500 shares at .0005. lost big on this one guys....going to put it into GZFX, at .024 and then sell at .o4 and then buy back into Q at .0004.

I was thinking about doing exactly that...
Any guesses as to how long you think the sell order will take to fill?
you gotta realize your putting your order in at the end of the line, and there is 8MM in front of you looking to sell at .0005 and who knows, some maybe looking to sell 1B+ shares, so the only chance it sells is if we see enormous buying pressure like last wednesday. id be shocked if it sells today.
 
Posted by mjm2005 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by MillerTIME:
quote:
Originally posted by mjm2005:
quote:
Originally posted by mjm2005:
quote:
Originally posted by CashCowMoo:
put my sell order in for 848,500 shares at .0005. lost big on this one guys....going to put it into GZFX, at .024 and then sell at .o4 and then buy back into Q at .0004.

I was thinking about doing exactly that...
Any guesses as to how long you think the sell order will take to fill?
you gotta realize your putting your order in at the end of the line, and there is 8MM in front of you looking to sell at .0005 and who knows, some maybe looking to sell 1B+ shares, so the only chance it sells is if we see enormous buying pressure like last wednesday. id be shocked if it sells today.
So, MT, the only way I'd be able to sell quickly...is if I were to drop the price I wanted...say to 0004 or 0003... just to get out ahead of the MMs? Or will it still fall in line no matter what price?
 
Posted by MillerTIME on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by mjm2005:
quote:
Originally posted by MillerTIME:
quote:
Originally posted by mjm2005:
quote:
Originally posted by mjm2005:
quote:
Originally posted by CashCowMoo:
put my sell order in for 848,500 shares at .0005. lost big on this one guys....going to put it into GZFX, at .024 and then sell at .o4 and then buy back into Q at .0004.

I was thinking about doing exactly that...
Any guesses as to how long you think the sell order will take to fill?
you gotta realize your putting your order in at the end of the line, and there is 8MM in front of you looking to sell at .0005 and who knows, some maybe looking to sell 1B+ shares, so the only chance it sells is if we see enormous buying pressure like last wednesday. id be shocked if it sells today.
So, MT, the only way I'd be able to sell quickly...is if I were to drop the price I wanted...say to 0004 or 0003... just to get out ahead of the MMs? Or will it still fall in line no matter what price?
no you dont need .0003, but .0004 is the bid. so if you sold at .0004 it would sell in like 30 seconds. If you tried to sell at .0005 you would have to wait till all 8 MM currently on the ask got filled and moved off the ask. Not saying that wont happen, but sometimes the MM will stay on the ask for days, weeks at a time. With QBID, its very hard to sell at the ask.
 
Posted by mjm2005 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by MillerTIME:
quote:
Originally posted by mjm2005:
quote:
Originally posted by MillerTIME:
quote:
Originally posted by mjm2005:
quote:
Originally posted by mjm2005:
quote:
Originally posted by CashCowMoo:
put my sell order in for 848,500 shares at .0005. lost big on this one guys....going to put it into GZFX, at .024 and then sell at .o4 and then buy back into Q at .0004.

I was thinking about doing exactly that...
Any guesses as to how long you think the sell order will take to fill?
you gotta realize your putting your order in at the end of the line, and there is 8MM in front of you looking to sell at .0005 and who knows, some maybe looking to sell 1B+ shares, so the only chance it sells is if we see enormous buying pressure like last wednesday. id be shocked if it sells today.
So, MT, the only way I'd be able to sell quickly...is if I were to drop the price I wanted...say to 0004 or 0003... just to get out ahead of the MMs? Or will it still fall in line no matter what price?
no you dont need .0003, but .0004 is the bid. so if you sold at .0004 it would sell in like 30 seconds. If you tried to sell at .0005 you would have to wait till all 8 MM currently on the ask got filled and moved off the ask. Not saying that wont happen, but sometimes the MM will stay on the ask for days, weeks at a time. With QBID, its very hard to sell at the ask.
Ok, so then the question is--

Do I bite the bullet...sell at 0004
Try my luck at 0005
Wait and see what happens with both (GZFX and QTN)

I think I'll probably just wait it out...ahhhh
 
Posted by DIGDOUGH on :
 
MT, thats the way I feel about the DVD at this time. Jsut another decoy. And probably doesn't say antyhing new anyway. Save the money on that, fire the Ir guy. Little things like that add up in operating costs. And savings.
 
Posted by sidhartha on :
 
gawd, I hope not, These are good sound posters from IHUB:

Posted by: malebaboon
In reply to: None Date:11/28/2005 1:16:13 PM
Post #of 190835

My honest opinion -

is that we have toxic debt here. Its the only scenario that could fit all the known facts and behaviors of this stock. It could be a combination of others, but I subscribe to Occam's Razor (paraphrased) "the simplest solution must be assumed true unless proven false".

I think the 'funding through 2008' is a deal Frank signed with 'investment bankers' similar to those outlined in the Time article. Its why he needs to raise the AS and why he concoted this 'restricted shares for movie library deal' as a cover for the truth. Whoever is selling here has no regard for the share price - even in the face of improving prospects for the network. So, if this is authentic selling volume, the seller is only interested in cash and basically has an unlimited number of shares to sell.

Frank also fits that bill - but I don't think it's him (directly) because the cable companies wouldn't be signing on unless there was some relative guarantee of funding for Q. Frank couldn't satisfy them with "look, I'll just sell shares ad infinitum to fund your requirements". But a signed contract to provide funding would satisfy them. The end result is the same - run the presses.

There are other possibilities but, unfortunately, the above scenario fits all the observable facts.

The only hope, IMO, is that Frank will close the gap between expenses and income in the near future, and the 'funding' can stop or slow considerably.

MB
-----------------------------------------------
Posted by: jacques0
In reply to: None Date:11/28/2005 12:54:26 PM
Post #of 190837

Despite my earlier post, I must admit that the Time Magazine article posted/linked/discussed yesterday or Saturday does suggest a frighteningly similar scenario here. Let's hope the co. can survive and grow until it can shake off this sort of thing.
-------------------------------------------------
http://www.time.com/time/insidebiz/article/0,9171,1126706,00.html

From the Magazine | Time Bonus Section December 2005: Inside Business
Watch Out, They Bite!
HOW HEDGE FUNDS TIED TO EMBATTLED BROKER REFCO USED "NAKED SHORT SELLING" TO PLUNDER SMALL COMPANIES
By DANIEL KADLEC
SUBSCRIBE TO TIMEPRINTE-MAILMORE BY AUTHOR
Posted Wednesday, Nov. 09, 2005
Thomas Badian was expecting a package, just not this one. Standing in his doorway, smiling, he opened the envelope a courier handed to him. Then he froze, and the color drained from his face. It was over: after two years overseas, the former New York City hedge-fund operator had been located. Badian slammed the door of his posh Vienna, Austria, apartment in the heart of the city's embassy quarter--but not before being officially served with a civil lawsuit linking him to the beleaguered U.S. commodities firm Refco and tying him and Refco to a type of fraud that some argue has destroyed thousands of companies and bilked investors out of billions of dollars.

The boyish-looking Badian, 36, of East European descent, seems an unlikely key figure in a high-stakes Wall Street intrigue. Yet long-standing criminal and civil charges place Badian at the center of a scheme to lend Arizona software developer Sedona much needed operating capital, then trigger the collapse of its stock and profit from the company's demise. This pattern is also alleged in the civil suit handed to Badian on Aug. 8 in his apartment in Austria--only this time the mark was pet-supplies company Pet Quarters, based in Lonoke, Ark.

Three years ago, Badian paid a $1 million fine to settle a Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) charge that he had manipulated Sedona's shares. Related criminal charges were filed a few months later, but by then Badian had fled. His whereabouts were recently given to U.S. Attorney Michael Garcia in New York City, whose office is handling the criminal case. Garcia's office said only that the case remains open.

Yet the Badian episode might have been forgotten if not for its ties to Refco, which last month admitted to reporting false results after hiding $430 million of uncollectible debt. Refco CEO Phillip Bennett was charged with fraud, and his company sank into bankruptcy protection within days. It turns out, plaintiff lawyers say, that Badian had been making some of his Sedona trades through Refco, which has acknowledged an SEC investigation.

Looking the other way while clients manipulated the shares of small companies through what's known as naked short selling appears to have been yet another questionable way of doing business at Refco. Short selling is legal: you borrow stock, then sell it and hope to buy it back at a lower price, profiting from the difference. But naked short selling is illegal, barring certain exceptions for brokers trying to maintain an orderly market. In naked short selling, you execute the sale without borrowing the stock. The SEC noted in a report last year the "pervasiveness" of the practice. When not caught, this kind of selling has no limits and allows a seller to drive down a stock.

Brokers are required to ask a client the nature of a stock sale. If it's a short sale, the broker must ascertain if the client has been able to borrow the stock. "I have seen evidence that links Badian and/or Refco to more than 50 stocks that were driven into the ground," says Wes Christian, part of a legal team headed by billionaire Texas tobacco litigator John O'Quinn, who is amassing a case against Badian, other hedge funds and now possibly Refco. Refco declined to comment. Badian didn't come to the door when a TIME reporter rang his bell. His lawyer in the civil cases, Perrie Weiner, says that the suits against Badian have "not a shred of merit" and that courts have consistently dismissed such cases.

After high-profile alleged frauds like Refco's and another this summer at hedge fund Bayou Management, where managers shut down the firm without notice, the call for strict oversight is growing. Largely unregulated investment pools for institutions and the wealthy, hedge funds make big bets--up or down--on stocks, bonds, commodities and currencies. Officials are investigating trading records at 35 institutions as part of their probe into naked short selling. And starting in February, hedge-fund advisers must register with the SEC.

Usually the victims of hedge-fund excesses are their rich customers, who lose when the hedge fund makes a bad bet. But through naked short selling, hedge funds can stir up trouble for any publicly traded firm. In the case of Pet Quarters, the suit alleges that Badian's hedge fund lent the firm sorely needed operating capital on terms that allowed the hedge fund to convert the debt to shares at any time. Through naked short selling, Badian then pushed Pet Quarters stock from $4 to just pennies. Badian balanced his massive short selling with cheap shares obtained after he converted the loan to stock.

Meanwhile, with its stock sinking, Pet Quarters couldn't raise the funds it needed to keep operating, and shut down. CEO Steve Dempsey and an executive who had invested with him wound up filing for personal bankruptcy. "There was nothing wrong with our business," says Dempsey. "We fell prey to the perfect crime." Weiner counters that "most of these companies" that blame short sellers when their stock falls are financially "barely skating by."

SEC data show that such relatively big firms as Overstock.com and Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia have been targets too. Overstock CEO Patrick Byrne has launched a crusade against naked short selling, charging that an unnamed criminal "mastermind" is conspiring against his company. Byrne says the attacks have "put limits on the amount of capital we can raise, how fast we can grow and how many people we can employ." His company's stock, at $76 in January, has tumbled into the low $30s. Byrne filed an unfair-practices suit in August against Rocker Partners, which specializes in short selling. Rocker says the suit is "frivolous" and blames Overstock's disappointing results for the stock slide.

But small companies are especially vulnerable because even modest trading can move the stock. Naked short selling "has got to push the price down," says James Angel, associate professor of finance at Georgetown University. He says the rate of short selling has nearly doubled in the past five years, to 36% of all trades. In the same period, assets held in hedge funds, which are active short sellers, more than doubled, to more than $1 trillion.

Illegal naked short selling, according to Robert Shapiro, a former Under Secretary of Commerce, has cost investors $100 billion and driven 1,000 companies into the ground. Shapiro is on O'Quinn's legal team, which has brought 16 cases against hedge funds and other traders. For their part, the hedge funds say that they have done nothing illegal, that the stocks they sell short ultimately drop because the companies are not doing well.

Papers filed in the Sedona case offer a rare glimpse into the cut-throat nature of naked short selling. Federal prosecutors, in a case that remains open against Thomas Badian but has been dropped against his brother Andreas, charge in the complaint that Andreas ordered brokers to sell Sedona shares short with "unbridled levels of aggression." After the stock had "collapsed," according to the complaint, he congratulated the brokers on a "good job" and instructed them to be "merciless" in selling the stock a day later.

Around that time, Thomas Badian was living the high life. Registered in his name was a two-seat 1998 Aston Martin. "He told me he liked to put the top down and take a long drive," recalls Pet Quarters' Dempsey. "I asked him if he'd like to drive out to Humboldt [Pa.] to take a look at our distribution center. For a guy who had just loaned us money, he seemed strangely detached. He never did make the drive." He had other plans for Pet Quarters. Just not the ones Dempsey had imagined.
 
Posted by CashCowMoo on :
 
well my order is still in at .0005, but if i have to sell at .0004 and take an even BIGGER loss so be it...i would be losing money by waiting to sell at .0005 then selling at .0004 and using less money to buy into GZFX. i really believe that GZFX will hit .10 by christmas. that is some good money. that stock is ALIVE....i was thinking about it today at lunch....and all i kept asking myself was....how on earth is QBID going to move UP in PPS with 60 BILLION A/S 50 O/S without a R/S?

today im dumping all my stocks that have no movement and high OS and will never buy another company with over 1 maybe 2 billion OS its just not worth it. people say...oh oh look at microsoft with 40 billion ....yeah well its MICROSOFT for crying out loud! LMAO


anyhow good luck to everyone. im still going to follow Q, but if GZFX continues a 10-20% daily increase in PPS i will keep my money in it until i see changes coming, because time is money and QBID has cost me dearly. not to mention ....the manmagement has made me feel like i cant trust them.
 
Posted by tarq3 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by sidhartha:
gawd, I hope not, These are good sound posters from IHUB:

Posted by: malebaboon
In reply to: None Date:11/28/2005 1:16:13 PM
Post #of 190835

My honest opinion -

is that we have toxic debt here. Its the only scenario that could fit all the known facts and behaviors of this stock. It could be a combination of others, but I subscribe to Occam's Razor (paraphrased) "the simplest solution must be assumed true unless proven false".

I think the 'funding through 2008' is a deal Frank signed with 'investment bankers' similar to those outlined in the Time article. Its why he needs to raise the AS and why he concoted this 'restricted shares for movie library deal' as a cover for the truth. Whoever is selling here has no regard for the share price - even in the face of improving prospects for the network. So, if this is authentic selling volume, the seller is only interested in cash and basically has an unlimited number of shares to sell.

Frank also fits that bill - but I don't think it's him (directly) because the cable companies wouldn't be signing on unless there was some relative guarantee of funding for Q. Frank couldn't satisfy them with "look, I'll just sell shares ad infinitum to fund your requirements". But a signed contract to provide funding would satisfy them. The end result is the same - run the presses.

There are other possibilities but, unfortunately, the above scenario fits all the observable facts.

The only hope, IMO, is that Frank will close the gap between expenses and income in the near future, and the 'funding' can stop or slow considerably.

MB

what you said faLLs in line and fits the biLL. about two years ago WiLLy Wizard was promoting this stock and did up until the big run then he totaLLy turned on it saying that Frank singed and deal for financing that was Death Spiral Funding or Toxic financing and that that he would never stand by or promote the company while that went on.
If anyone knows about these types of financing the stock is truely acting like a stock that has bEEn funded that way
 
Posted by sidhartha on :
 
I think it was King Crimson that shared this with us the other day:

http://www.privateraise.com/search/issuerlist.php3?sortkey=T
 
Posted by FatherOfTwo on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by tarq3:
quote:
Originally posted by sidhartha:
gawd, I hope not, These are good sound posters from IHUB:

Posted by: malebaboon
In reply to: None Date:11/28/2005 1:16:13 PM
Post #of 190835

My honest opinion -

is that we have toxic debt here. Its the only scenario that could fit all the known facts and behaviors of this stock. It could be a combination of others, but I subscribe to Occam's Razor (paraphrased) "the simplest solution must be assumed true unless proven false".

I think the 'funding through 2008' is a deal Frank signed with 'investment bankers' similar to those outlined in the Time article. Its why he needs to raise the AS and why he concoted this 'restricted shares for movie library deal' as a cover for the truth. Whoever is selling here has no regard for the share price - even in the face of improving prospects for the network. So, if this is authentic selling volume, the seller is only interested in cash and basically has an unlimited number of shares to sell.

Frank also fits that bill - but I don't think it's him (directly) because the cable companies wouldn't be signing on unless there was some relative guarantee of funding for Q. Frank couldn't satisfy them with "look, I'll just sell shares ad infinitum to fund your requirements". But a signed contract to provide funding would satisfy them. The end result is the same - run the presses.

There are other possibilities but, unfortunately, the above scenario fits all the observable facts.

The only hope, IMO, is that Frank will close the gap between expenses and income in the near future, and the 'funding' can stop or slow considerably.

MB

what you said faLLs in line and fits the biLL. about two years ago WiLLy Wizard was promoting this stock and did up until the big run then he totaLLy turned on it saying that Frank singed and deal for financing that was Death Spiral Funding or Toxic financing and that that he would never stand by or promote the company while that went on.
If anyone knows about these types of financing the stock is truely acting like a stock that has bEEn funded that way

This is begining to look like the Cornell CD financing agreements.... Instead of agreeing to a fixed # of restricted shares, they agree to convert the debt to shares at a deeply discounted (60%) pps based on last couple days avg lows...

So, if the financier is converting the shares at an avg pps of .0005, that means they are buying them at .0003 and selling them at .0004 -.0005 for a nice profit! It also explains why the O/S has grown, and the A/S would need to be raised to cover the issuance of huge numbers of shares!

Has anyone here verified the financing agreements???
 
Posted by CashCowMoo on :
 
oh well thats just great...score one for the investors!
 
Posted by Dew-it on :
 
I keep asking myself this question: When Frankie signs a deal with a carrier is the agreement as Triangle Multi Media, Inc or is it Q Television Network? I don't think any carrier would want to do business with "Pinky" with 60B O/S. Therefore, I think Frankie is taughting his deals as Q Television Network. If you read the carrier deal PRs, its always QTN this and QTN that... it is never Triangle Multi Media signs carrier deal, blah, blah. Is that why QTN is registered in Nevada with 75,000 authorized shares? This is starting to smell fishy. Also, in the 10/31/05 shareholder letter Frankie also talks about QTN Audit and QTN that, with the exception when he specifically mentions breakdown of assests between QTN and TMM. IMO when Frankie sells, the shareholder holdings will probaly only be a fraction if any of what he sells it for. BTW, Frankie, where THE HELL is the audit!?
 
Posted by QBID'n on :
 
holy holy hooooly cow you guys!

I apologize, but total speculation brings me to post this again imho....


quote:
Originally posted by QBID'n:
[QUOTE]

I just find it funny when some people come and go on this board because when they come, they talk of selling and/or throwing Franks efforts into the wind. But they are doing it for all the wrong reasons (FEAR OF SPECULATION) in my view. Frank may be many things to many people, but to me he is the mule that pulls the plow. He is doing what he has to do to build Q, and yet sadly enough, he continues to infuriate some investors who are impatient and blinded by emotion and instant greed. jmho

Pi$$ on speculation!....just be patient guys.
 
Posted by mikensay on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by FatherOfTwo:
[/qb]

This is begining to look like the Cornell CD financing agreements.... Instead of agreeing to a fixed # of restricted shares, they agree to convert the debt to shares at a deeply discounted (60%) pps based on last couple days avg lows...

So, if the financier is converting the shares at an avg pps of .0005, that means they are buying them at .0003 and selling them at .0004 -.0005 for a nice profit! It also explains why the O/S has grown, and the A/S would need to be raised to cover the issuance of huge numbers of shares!

Has anyone here verified the financing agreements??? [/QB][/QUOTE]


If this is the case, the financier has opted to convert their debt to shares and dump them for cash? I'm trying to see a silver lining and its tough but should this be the case, the debt load would be reduced?

I can't see how this would be a positive for the stock given all the latest press.
 
Posted by King Crimson on :
 
been posting about this for awhile now....

...in the mid-1990s, PIPE deals were primarily opportunistic financings for small and/or distressed high-growth companies, typically structured with floating conversion prices known as “death spiral” transactions.

good luck to us all....
 
Posted by noah129 on :
 
wow its getting pretty gloomy in here. im guessing that we must be close to a bottom as when i hear of long time investors dumping shares to me that means we have lost alot of investor confidance.

i am a wrecklace pumper so dont beleive anything i say but i think we are near the bottom just based on the fact qbid is deeply hated by many now. i personally cannot sell my shares as i am way way way too deep in the whole to sell now, but it appears to me that many are dumping and running now.

i hear alot of talk about gzfx the charts look good but i just want to cuation anyone who is thinking of going into that that the stock is up approx. 1000% already. it can go much higher but i would be thinking of waiting for a good dip before i jumped in onto something that is up so big already. just my ignorant humble opinions good luck to you all.

sincerely a long and strong qbidiot.

no mm manipulation wind can shake this little tree. im in for the long haul i just hope that frank does us real true longs right one day.
 
Posted by Ad astra on :
 
Dew-

Is QTN registered in Nevada? (I thought it was Washington State?). You also mentioned it has 75,000 authorized shares?

Does anyone know why a subsidiary of a company would have outstanding shares? Is this normal?
 
Posted by GatorMan on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Ad astra:
Dew-

Is QTN registered in Nevada? (I thought it was Washington State?). You also mentioned it has 75,000 authorized shares?

Does anyone know why a subsidiary of a company would have outstanding shares? Is this normal?

Every corporation has shares. If there are 75,000 shares of QTN issued, and it's wholly owned by QBID, then QBID owns all 75k shares.
 
Posted by Ad astra on :
 
Gator- Thanks. I was just checking and I believe you are correct.
 
Posted by Ad astra on :
 
Okay, NOW I AM NOT posting anymore! I've wasted away my day speculating outloud! Thanks for the dialogue everyone.

I'll be back when the audit arrives...When the audit arrives...IF the audit arrives. [Smile]
 
Posted by King Crimson on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Ad astra:
Is QTN registered in Nevada? (I thought it was Washington State?). You also mentioned it has 75,000 authorized shares?

there are 3 SEPERATE corps...
 
Posted by Dew-it on :
 
My bad....it is WA. I posted in reference to info posted several posts back, I should have referenced it. But I am still confused as to why there are so many diff structures and not one structure and why QTN has 75K A/S??? Frankie needs to explain what the hell this all means.


quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by Ad astra:
...i just wanted to be sure of the entire ownership structure of Q Television
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

there are 3 corps...

TRIANGLE MULTIMEDIA LIMITED --ticker symbol QBID or QBID.pk
http://www.secstate.wa.gov/corps/search_detail.aspx?name=TRIANGLE+MULTIMEDIA+LIMITED&ubi=601047757

Q TELEVISION NETWORK, INC. --"affiliate" or "wholly-owned subsidiary"
http://www.secstate.wa.gov/corps/search_detail.aspx?name=Q+TELEVISION+NETWORK%2c+INC.&ubi=602391767

...and in default since 11/1/05 (list of officers due 10/31/05)....
TRIANGLE TELEVISION NETWORK, INC (nv)
https://esos.state.nv.us/SOSServices/AnonymousAccess/CorpSearch/CorpDetails.aspx?CorpID=462911


quote:
Originally posted by GatorMan:
quote:
Originally posted by Ad astra:
Dew-

Is QTN registered in Nevada? (I thought it was Washington State?). You also mentioned it has 75,000 authorized shares?

Does anyone know why a subsidiary of a company would have outstanding shares? Is this normal?

Every corporation has shares. If there are 75,000 shares of QTN issued, and it's wholly owned by QBID, then QBID owns all 75k shares.

 
Posted by GatorMan on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Dew-it:
I keep asking myself this question: When Frankie signs a deal with a carrier is the agreement as Triangle Multi Media, Inc or is it Q Television Network? I don't think any carrier would want to do business with "Pinky" with 60B O/S. Therefore, I think Frankie is taughting his deals as Q Television Network. If you read the carrier deal PRs, its always QTN this and QTN that... it is never Triangle Multi Media signs carrier deal, blah, blah. Is that why QTN is registered in Nevada with 75,000 authorized shares? This is starting to smell fishy. Also, in the 10/31/05 shareholder letter Frankie also talks about QTN Audit and QTN that, with the exception when he specifically mentions breakdown of assests between QTN and TMM. IMO when Frankie sells, the shareholder holdings will probaly only be a fraction if any of what he sells it for. BTW, Frankie, where THE HELL is the audit!?

IMO the deals are with QTN, not TMM. And, yes, from what I read the audit pertains to QTN, not TMM. We need to be thinking about these as two entities, one owning the other but accounted for separately. The is nothing unusual about this type of set up. It's done all the time and pretty much all the giants do it. Consider GE owning NBC. NBC is accounted for, and treated as, a completely separate company. GE rolls the NBC results into their own financial statements when they report to the shareholders.

What's unusual here, although not so much for pinkies, is that we don't know a lot about the arrangement nor do we know much about TMM.
 
Posted by GatorMan on :
 
I agree that there is a lot to explain, although I'm not sure why QTN only having 75k A/S would be one of them.

quote:
Originally posted by Dew-it:
My bad....it is WA. I posted in reference to info posted several posts back, I should have referenced it. But I am still confused as to why there are so many diff structures and not one structure and why QTN has 75K A/S??? Frankie needs to explain what the hell this all means.


quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by Ad astra:
...i just wanted to be sure of the entire ownership structure of Q Television
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

there are 3 corps...

TRIANGLE MULTIMEDIA LIMITED --ticker symbol QBID or QBID.pk
http://www.secstate.wa.gov/corps/search_detail.aspx?name=TRIANGLE+MULTIMEDIA+LIMITED&ubi=601047757

Q TELEVISION NETWORK, INC. --"affiliate" or "wholly-owned subsidiary"
http://www.secstate.wa.gov/corps/search_detail.aspx?name=Q+TELEVISION+NETWORK%2c+INC.&ubi=602391767

...and in default since 11/1/05 (list of officers due 10/31/05)....
TRIANGLE TELEVISION NETWORK, INC (nv)
https://esos.state.nv.us/SOSServices/AnonymousAccess/CorpSearch/CorpDetails.aspx?CorpID=462911


quote:
Originally posted by GatorMan:
quote:
Originally posted by Ad astra:
Dew-

Is QTN registered in Nevada? (I thought it was Washington State?). You also mentioned it has 75,000 authorized shares?

Does anyone know why a subsidiary of a company would have outstanding shares? Is this normal?

Every corporation has shares. If there are 75,000 shares of QTN issued, and it's wholly owned by QBID, then QBID owns all 75k shares.


 
Posted by King Crimson on :
 
folks...

TRIANGLE TELEVISION NETWORK, INC (nv) has 75k a/s

...NOT qtn
 
Posted by GatorMan on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by King Crimson:
folks...

TRIANGLE TELEVISION NETWORK, INC (nv) has 75k a/s

...NOT qtn

Was just looking at that (didn't before I posted.) Anyway, my comments still stand in general if not in specific.
 
Posted by DIGDOUGH on :
 
This is an off topic post but it shines some light on the rumor that Q pushed Playboy off the slot in NYC. The probability looks strong.

Can Playboy pull a rabbit out of the hat?




Hugh Hefner recently bought millions of dollars' worth of Playboy stock. Does the Robed One know something about the struggling company that other investors don't?

By Michael Brush

Given the huge amount of “adult entertainment” we consume as a nation, it’s a wonder Playboy Enterprises' stock performs like it needs a dose of Viagra.

Just look at the size of the porn market:
Americans spend about $5 billion to $8 billion on smut each year.


Sex sites account for 40% of all Internet traffic.


Satellite and cable operators earn about $800 million a year from adult movies, or about 40% of pay TV and on-demand TV revenue.
Now look at how Playboy Enterprises (PLA, news, msgs) continues to struggle:


Playboy magazine lost money last quarter as publishing revenue slipped 8%. Playboy circulation fell again to near 3 million -- which means the monthly places 19th among U.S. magazines.


Founded by Hugh Hefner in 1953, the magazine is now firmly entrenched in circulation rankings below National Geographic, Good Housekeeping and Ladies’ Home Journal. So far this year, Playboy's publishing unit has lost $3.4 million.


In the third quarter, Playboy as a company took in just $80.9 million in revenue. The 10 cents a share in profit Playboy earned may seem good -- since that beat last year’s results by four cents. But a closer peek reveals cost-cutting saved the day, along with sharp declines in taxes and interest payments. Without that help, which can’t last forever, the company would have reported a loss of 5 cents per share.


For the first three quarters of the year, Playboy revenue grew an anemic 3%, and the business lost 16 cents a share -- exactly the same amount of red ink spilled in the same period last year.
All of this paints a fairly dreary portrait of Playboy.

[Big Grin]
 
Posted by Penny-Trader on :
 
Yes Doc posted it earlier today.

quote:
Originally posted by mjm2005:
Did someone already post the article listed on 365gay.com???

The one about World AIDS Day---
http://www.365gay.com/entertainment/tv/112805TV.htm


 
Posted by Dew-it on :
 
I dunno, but it bugs me, because it seems QTN is being treated as a separate company. Frankie main focus is QTN and not TMM (IMO) and I think somehow we as shareholders will get the short end of this, when Frankie sells QTN. Paranoia on my part? You bet!

quote:
Originally posted by GatorMan:
I agree that there is a lot to explain, although I'm not sure why QTN only having 75k A/S would be one of them.

quote:
Originally posted by Dew-it:
My bad....it is WA. I posted in reference to info posted several posts back, I should have referenced it. But I am still confused as to why there are so many diff structures and not one structure and why QTN has 75K A/S??? Frankie needs to explain what the hell this all means.


quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by Ad astra:
...i just wanted to be sure of the entire ownership structure of Q Television
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

there are 3 corps...

TRIANGLE MULTIMEDIA LIMITED --ticker symbol QBID or QBID.pk
http://www.secstate.wa.gov/corps/search_detail.aspx?name=TRIANGLE+MULTIMEDIA+LIMITED&ubi=601047757

Q TELEVISION NETWORK, INC. --"affiliate" or "wholly-owned subsidiary"
http://www.secstate.wa.gov/corps/search_detail.aspx?name=Q+TELEVISION+NETWORK%2c+INC.&ubi=602391767

...and in default since 11/1/05 (list of officers due 10/31/05)....
TRIANGLE TELEVISION NETWORK, INC (nv)
https://esos.state.nv.us/SOSServices/AnonymousAccess/CorpSearch/CorpDetails.aspx?CorpID=462911


quote:
Originally posted by GatorMan:
quote:
Originally posted by Ad astra:
Dew-

Is QTN registered in Nevada? (I thought it was Washington State?). You also mentioned it has 75,000 authorized shares?

Does anyone know why a subsidiary of a company would have outstanding shares? Is this normal?

Every corporation has shares. If there are 75,000 shares of QTN issued, and it's wholly owned by QBID, then QBID owns all 75k shares.



 
Posted by CashCowMoo on :
 
well my sell order went in at .0004 i tried for hours at .0005 but figured it just wasnt going to happen. maybe in a week, but im using my HUGE loss to put into GZFX tomorrow. im tired of dead beat stocks with no movement. CMKX, QBID, AZTM are my three worst....one holding i have is in TNOG which i bought last june...ride the wave in july to .o5 now its sub-penny! ARGH! i have some GZFX already and its doubled so thats a plus...and a few other small positions in green but nothing to make up for Q.


good luck all
 
Posted by Ad astra on :
 
folks...

TRIANGLE TELEVISION NETWORK, INC (nv) has 75k a/s

...NOT qtn

-----------------------
I just called Wash SoS to confirm. Q Television Network UBI 602-391-767 has 75k A/S as well. But again, another call should be made to confirm.
 
Posted by Dustoff101 on :
 
Look in dictionary for the word *Enigma*
thats about the best word I can find,
so far, for the whole situation.
 
Posted by Dew-it on :
 
You mean enema, right? LOL!

quote:
Originally posted by Dustoff101:
Look in dictionary for the word *Enigma*
thats about the best word I can find,
so far, for the whole situation.


 
Posted by HossTrader on :
 
Good word Dustoff

I mean we all know that the company is growing and has massive potential.
The company has experienced and still maybe experiencing the effects of massive dilution.
But you can't dilute without buyers, and the price hasn't moved enough to say it is flipping,

so who has bought something like 2-3 billion shares in the last week alone?????

We can talk about the death spiral and the pipe financing all day. But you can't sell that many shares into nothingness, especially without causing a downtick.
 
Posted by Monopoly Money on :
 
i got a reply from the email i sent, which apparently went to richard. He just said the usual, "As an outsourced investor relations Co., I am not privy to the day-to-day and or audit information. That said, I will forward your e-mail to management."

So if i get anything from QTN itself i shall let you know. But it was nice to at least get a reply from Someone, and looked to be early in the am as well.
 
Posted by MillerTIME on :
 
close....

.0004x.0005
9x9

Volume = 1.6B (#4 all time)

Have a goodnight everybody
 
Posted by noah129 on :
 
hi millertime im not doubting your info but looking at the charts to me today was the largest volume every more than thursdays too. i could very well be wrong but if you dont mind on what date/day was the volume bigger.

hope you all have a great day lets hope for some good news soon. qbids gonna go to a penny one day folks just be patient. but then again dont beleive anything you read from a sleezy qbidiot who has alterior motives. pump pump up up and away hehehe.
 
Posted by MillerTIME on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by noah129:
hi millertime im not doubting your info but looking at the charts to me today was the largest volume every more than thursdays too. i could very well be wrong but if you dont mind on what date/day was the volume bigger.

hope you all have a great day lets hope for some good news soon. qbids gonna go to a penny one day folks just be patient. but then again dont beleive anything you read from a sleezy qbidiot who has alterior motives. pump pump up up and away hehehe.

Top 11 Volume days in QBIDS history...

8/17/2005 1,135,825,152
2/4/2004 1,187,103,616
2/11/2004 1,352,267,648
4/15/2004 1,436,485,120
11/18/2005 1,511,399,808
4/13/2004 1,567,453,184
3/21/2005 1,578,814,976
11/23/2005 1,590,359,040
5/11/2004 1,623,194,752
4/14/2004 1,825,717,760
2/10/2004 2,147,483,648
 
Posted by a4realguy on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Ad astra:
folks...

TRIANGLE TELEVISION NETWORK, INC (nv) has 75k a/s

...NOT qtn

-----------------------
I just called Wash SoS to confirm. Q Television Network UBI 602-391-767 has 75k A/S as well. But again, another call should be made to confirm.

OK... and? What is your conclusion?
 
Posted by Penny-Trader on :
 
See you tomorrow.

we will see you before we see the audit.

have a good night


Rod


quote:
Originally posted by Ad astra:
Okay, NOW I AM NOT posting anymore! I've wasted away my day speculating outloud! Thanks for the dialogue everyone.

I'll be back when the audit arrives...When the audit arrives...IF the audit arrives. [Smile]


 
Posted by CashCowMoo on :
 
my final post on the Q thread...moving to a better televised company. fights!


FCDH this baby is starting to pick up momentum. i have been all over the internet today and have read some really good theories and comparisons of FCDH and QBID. personally i think the demand for FCDH is much much higher than for QBID. i sold all my QBID today (taking a major loss) and bought FCDH.....in fact FCDH is now trading higher than QBID with LESS O/S!!!!!


everyone loves a good fight! anyone notice how popular the fighting championships are on pay per view? demand demand demand...more demand in the USA for a good fight network than for a gay channel. QBID ...will be fine years from now...just didnt make it lately.
 
Posted by mjm2005 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Penny-Trader:
Yes Doc posted it earlier today.

quote:
Originally posted by mjm2005:
Did someone already post the article listed on 365gay.com???

The one about World AIDS Day---
http://www.365gay.com/entertainment/tv/112805TV.htm


Damn it Doc, whyd you done now been gotten all responsible?
 
Posted by Penny-Trader on :
 
guys relax on the 75000 shares of QTN TTN

Q television is a wholly owned subsidiary of TMM.

that means that TMM who's ticker symbol is QBID, owns and controls the 75,000 shares of QTN.

we own 47% of the channel and Frank owns 53% of the channel.

plain and simple.

this has been a typical fear tactic that has been thrown out time after time after time. And it always happens just as the day-traders are about to buy back in, that usually means that we are in for a run.

one last verifying sign we will need is a post from U4TSAF2.

when the day-traders start back into this, the volatility will return and the stock could rise 100% for several days in a row.

Im not saying this is going to happen for sure, but it is typical behavior to try and strike the last little bit of fear into people to sell out thier shares and hope for a down tick or 2 so that they can maximise thier run.

I always like seeing this part of it happening, as i know we are about to have some fun.

Just watch and see if this board is not buzzing with excitement before the end of the week again.

rod
 
Posted by Penny-Trader on :
 
Good luck with that CashcowMOO sounds like a solid idea to me.

I wont invest in it though as it will screw it up for ya.


Rod

quote:
Originally posted by CashCowMoo:
my final post on the Q thread...moving to a better televised company. fights!


FCDH this baby is starting to pick up momentum. i have been all over the internet today and have read some really good theories and comparisons of FCDH and QBID. personally i think the demand for FCDH is much much higher than for QBID. i sold all my QBID today (taking a major loss) and bought FCDH.....in fact FCDH is now trading higher than QBID with LESS O/S!!!!!


everyone loves a good fight! anyone notice how popular the fighting championships are on pay per view? demand demand demand...more demand in the USA for a good fight network than for a gay channel. QBID ...will be fine years from now...just didnt make it lately.


 
Posted by FatherOfTwo on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by MillerTIME:
quote:
Originally posted by noah129:
hi millertime im not doubting your info but looking at the charts to me today was the largest volume every more than thursdays too. i could very well be wrong but if you dont mind on what date/day was the volume bigger.

hope you all have a great day lets hope for some good news soon. qbids gonna go to a penny one day folks just be patient. but then again dont beleive anything you read from a sleezy qbidiot who has alterior motives. pump pump up up and away hehehe.

Top 11 Volume days in QBIDS history...

8/17/2005 1,135,825,152
2/4/2004 1,187,103,616
2/11/2004 1,352,267,648
4/15/2004 1,436,485,120
11/18/2005 1,511,399,808
4/13/2004 1,567,453,184
3/21/2005 1,578,814,976
11/23/2005 1,590,359,040
5/11/2004 1,623,194,752
4/14/2004 1,825,717,760
2/10/2004 2,147,483,648

Date Volume % Change
2/10/2004 2,147,483,600 -21.739
4/14/2004 1,825,717,700 53.465
5/11/2004 1,623,194,700 -5.645
11/28/2005 1,602,379,500 0.000
11/23/2005 1,590,359,000 -16.670
3/21/2005 1,578,815,000 36.154
4/13/2004 1,567,453,200 80.357
11/18/2005 1,511,399,700 -20.000
4/15/2004 1,436,485,100 -10.968
2/11/2004 1,352,267,600 16.667
2/4/2004 1,187,103,600 50.000
8/17/2005 1,135,825,100 0.000
11/14/2005 1,069,103,100 25.000
11/21/2005 1,048,225,800 25.000
11/1/2005 1,047,070,100 20.000
8/29/2005 1,046,866,400 15.385
8/2/2005 1,045,205,700 7.143
2/3/2004 1,022,443,000 -50.000
 
Posted by Clyde_Crashcup on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Penny-Trader:
guys relax on the 75000 shares of QTN TTN

Q television is a wholly owned subsidiary of TMM.

that means that TMM who's ticker symbol is QBID, owns and controls the 75,000 shares of QTN.

we own 47% of the channel and Frank owns 53% of the channel.

plain and simple.

this has been a typical fear tactic that has been thrown out time after time after time. And it always happens just as the day-traders are about to buy back in, that usually means that we are in for a run.

one last verifying sign we will need is a post from U4TSAF2.

when the day-traders start back into this, the volatility will return and the stock could rise 100% for several days in a row.

Im not saying this is going to happen for sure, but it is typical behavior to try and strike the last little bit of fear into people to sell out thier shares and hope for a down tick or 2 so that they can maximise thier run.

I always like seeing this part of it happening, as i know we are about to have some fun.

Just watch and see if this board is not buzzing with excitement before the end of the week again.

rod

Maybe the problem is that Frank owns 53%??? I was told along time ago that in business if you own 49% or less, you own nothing. If you own 51% or more, you own it all. Frank has to answer to no one and he knows it.
 
Posted by Penny-Trader on :
 
true but we will never own that much, so we have to hope that Frank is going to make this company proffitable.

it appears to me that Frank is building this company.

in time the price will reflect the success of the company.

hopefully the price will rise above where we bought in to this company.

no guarantys in the stock market. Im hoping for the best.

this is the one pink that has a product to show and is growing. so lets hope this is the one pink to excape the pinks and move forward.

Rod
 
Posted by QBID'n on :
 
Sorry for the long post.

But in regards to the 60 bil shares, this made for an interesting read. And I repeat, just an interesting read.

Start from the bottom.

From: clayton*mynetwire.com Save to addressbook
To: "Equity Relations, Inc." <staff*equityrelations.com>
Subject: RE:
Date: Tue, 22 November 2005 14:53:55


Richard,

A very well written email you have sent my way. I appreciate the time and effort it took. I made my points and you have now made yours. We can agree to disagree on some of the subjects.

One thing I will say is I apologize for the ignorance of few, as far as threats made your way for doing your job. I am a nice guy, I see no pont in threats, especially to someone whom is paid to update on already public knowledge. Some people just can't understand it.

I could highlight every paragraph and comment back, but as you have said, you don't have time for these longs emails. Understood!! Some nice PR's today, but again, without said audit to tell us the info we need, we go nowhere and we never shall with 50 or 60 billion out.

Bottom line is this, I can try to recoup some losses here by waiting it out. In the mean time, it never hurts to try and receive information from the company, especially when that is exactly what has been promised. The market wants to see financials and a new exchange, we have been told these things would happen. When that info is made public as promised, I will then make my exit strategy.

For the record I am not a trader, I dabble in day-trading, but this was my first penny stock purchase ever. Sorry to have insinuated your position on shares. I gained some more respect from you with that comment, actually from our back and forth emails in general. It took some time for you to write them and I appreciate it.

The entire time while I was reading, I couldn't help but admire how professional you truly are. That said, I will wait it out and not bother you with petty questions of which you have no control over. Now as far a the company goes, I am willing to give them some cushion time for these promises.

Let me ask you a question man to man here for a second. How long should one wait for spoken promises? If it was you sitting where myself and others are, when would enough be enough? I am asking you a real question here, we both know things have not been handled to the best of Franks ability. Truly people have been very forgiving and would continue to be, doesn't the company know that?

Again thanks!

Regards,

Clayton

-----Original Message-----
From: "Equity Relations, Inc." <staff*equityrelations.com>
Sent: Tue, 22 November 2005 10:54:03
To: clayton*mynetwire.com
Subject: RE:


Clayton,

I have read your email and although articulate, the points made lack
insight to what you invested in.

As for Ihub, do you honestly believe I would receive questions as, "Does
Frank have HIV?,etc. No, I would get asked questions regarding the
audit, QTN vs. QBID, contract negotiations, etc. These issues are
private and/or inside information and until made public they will not be
discussed and furthermore, I'm not privy to most of that information
anyway.

As for part of my position, your assumptions and your clear insinuations
are incorrect. I have owned this stock for years and it was personally
purchased by me. So I do feel for the discouraged shareholders I speak
of. That said, I'll say it again, I believe in this company and that is
how I invest. I have never purchased a stock in hopes of changing a
company. If I'm not happy with management or execution, I sell - No
remorse or emotions. (Strictly my opinion and any investor should
discuss their investment with an Advisor)

I have seen most of the PR's that have come out over the last year and
although some have not come to fruition, I personally do not feel that
the company was purposely misleading the shareholders. Again, if you
feel that way I'm still confused as to why you wouldn't sell? If I
thought for one moment the company was misleading me I would immediately
resign as IR and sell my stock. But again, that is strictly a personal
opinion.

Yes, this is without a doubt is a new company. A six year old company is
a baby. What people forget is that TMM came out of the gate public.
This company should still be private and all the bumps and bruises they
are expericing are exactly the same as any other newer company - The
difference here is the public gets to witness the bumps. Generally
speaking, a company will iron out its issues become strong, contract an
underwriter and IPO once they are more mature.

Copied from the CC. "And I would not increase the stock, the
outstanding, one iota without informing the shareholders in advance, and
there would be only one reason I'd do it, and I'm going to tell you
right out in front: There is a movie series that has 307 episodes,
which I've been trying to get for ten years, and it would be just like -
it would be just like another I Love Lucy, which would bring in money
and bring in money and bring in money.

And I don't even care, I'll tell you the name of it. I'm working very
hard to get the rights to Mary Hartman, Mary Hartman. And I've been
working on it for five years. And that would be the only reason that I
would make - increase the - increase in the shares, so I would have some
restricted stock, so they would go along with me to give me the soap.
That would be the only reason. And I would notify the shareholders in
advance, and I would even let them vote on it and I would abstain. But
there's 307 episodes of Mary Hartman, Mary Hartman; and it has never
been - the music rights have never been cleared, and that's why you've
never seen it. And you youngsters don't know what it is, but old guys
like me know that it would be a great series to have on the shelf."

This specifically states he will not raise the O/S w/out shareholder
approval - It says nothing about amending the A/S for preparation. With
due respect, in business you must be prepared if an opportunity presents
itself.

Now, if Frank does not come to shareholders with the vote if he
purchases MH then you have an argument, but as of now he has done
nothing wrong.

I don't care if you defend my on Ihub, you are the one who stated you
did, not me. I understand that I took on the job of "messenger" and
occasionally I'll be the one shot at. I know the laws and the financial
markets very well and I'm very confident in my approach towards
shareholders - I'm very careful in what I say to shareholders. This is
for two reasons, one, to protect myself and my family and two, to be as
honest and forthright to the shareholders as possible. I understand the
shareholders get upset with me when I say "I do not know or I'm not
privy", but on most matters that's just the way it is. What
shareholders fail to realize is they have invested in a non-reporting,
Pink Sheet Company and information is not as available as a registered
security, and as much as the shareholders want to think otherwise, this
is what they have invested in. I get physically threatened almost once a
week and so does my family, I'm called every name in the book and most
laughable, blamed for TMM pps issues. This is the job I signed up for
and quite frankly, individuals hiding behind screen names and emails do
not scare me and I know most of the time they must blame me. If they
blamed management then it would reflect poorly on their original
investment decision and no one ever likes to admit they were wrong. Most
of the shareholders are good people and I also understand they must vent
and if that needs to be pointed at me from time to time without merit,
that's fine.

I don't consider a friend NOT filing a lawsuit. The company has strong
counsel and individuals must do what they have to do. Now, I know
technology has given shareholders more of a voice and that is good, but
gathering names off of message boards and crying foul play because the
company has increased their A/S or have not delivered on every PR does
not sound to me as a productive task. I'll say it again, if I thought
the company was purposely deceiving you, me and all the others I would
spearhead the campaign, but other than mistakes they have made along the
way, I see no evidence of criminal activity (please understand this is
my personal opinion, I am not a lawyer and should not be viewed as a
biased favor towards the company. Individuals should discuss with their
Attorneys).

I don't peg you as a menace. With due respect, I have hundreds of
shareholders just like you emailing every week and you are more than
welcome to post what ever you like. I never understood the fascination
with message boards, but to each his/her own. The message boards are a
very small part of my day, but they do need to be addressed. The
company actually takes no part in them unless slander is occurring -
Other than that they have many more important issues to focus on.

Clayton, you must remember what you invested in, a non-reporting pink
sheet company and I hope all your questions get answered and I would
like nothing more than to be able to answer them for you and all the
other shareholders - I'm given information on a need to know basis and
that is in-line with smaller Pink Sheet Companies. Do I wish the company
was more transparent? Of course, but I do however realize and fully
understand what I have invested my money and time into and for the time
being, an SEC reporting, fully disclosing company this is not.

All that said, I admire your dedication to the trade. I'm assuming you
day trade considering you post throughout much of the day and I wish you
success.

I cannot continue these long emails, but I felt you were owed a reply.
Feel free to contact me anytime.

Regards,

Richard Brown
Equity Relations, Inc.
Creating Synergy Between Company and Investor
Office: 617-314-7379
Email: Staff*equityrelations.com
Web: www.equityrelations.com
Please visit our website for company information and disclaimers


-----Original Message-----
From: clayton*mynetwire.com [mailto:clayton*mynetwire.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2005 8:10 AM
To: Equity Relations, Inc.
Subject: RE:

Richard,

I am well aware of the emails you receive daily. I went from thinking
you were coming to iHUB for a visit, to all of the sudden no replies
your way. This was the reason from my concern. I also thought the
point of you making an appearance on iHUB were to clear any and all
rumors. Isn't that what you did on RB, please correct me if I am wrong?

I was pretty sure you own shares of QBID, but have you actually bought
shares like the discouraged shareholders you speak of? It would see
easier to be content if in fact you had never bought a share. Better
yet never bought a share based on a misleading PR, like so many of us
has.

Also, when you say "newer companies" who exactly are you referring to?
TMM/GAAY/QTN has been around since 1999; myself and the large group of
extreme longs I converse with, would beg to differ that this is a "newer
company". Everyone has their definition I suppose.

Now about the AS/Mary Hartman deal Frank had stated in the CC that he
would let investors vote on such a thing. Funny, I received no ballot.
This is another statement made by Frank that will be held against him by
many. So you're correct, we were told this in the CC, but in the same
sentence told we had a say. I can't speak for all the investors, but I
am willing to bet the majority would have voted against it.

As far as defending "you" on iHUB, there isn't enough time in the day
for that task. It seems many blame you for the PPS. Some take it
further and make personal remarks or attacks. It isn't right and you
won't see me taking part in those reindeer games. If you need
verification, I can most certainly provide you with posts where I have
stood in your defense. It is obvious your "board monitors" dropped the
ball in relaying those messages to you.

Now regarding my actions with criticism of the company. You say you see
me "beating on the company, questioning their every move and scaring
people with talk of lawsuits". I can agree with the first two parts of
those statements, but I wouldn't say it wasn't just. In "beating on the
company" I take it you mean criticizing them for misleading PR's or
website updates, falsified statements, lies, or as Frank may say things
that have not yet come to fruition? If so, then yes sir you're correct.
I am not interfering with their business model; I am just telling it
like it is. People need to be held accountable and remember the
promises they make.

Not sure if you're aware of this but I went out to the studio meeting
with a 3 day notice from Indiana. I have gone to other QTN events; I
have tons of friends & family in this stock. I can lose all my money
here and be fine. I'm down over five figures on this. I could walk
away and sell at a 90% loss. Would that be fair to me or others given
the statements made by Frank? I stand for all the people who have been
wronged here. I know how long an audit takes; my best friends are
accountants and lawyers. Which make your "scaring people with talk of
lawsuits" comment laughable to me? That sir is not correct. I have
actually discouraged the MANY requests for me to start one, or at least
help unite one. I do know things have been said that are in fact
illegal by the company, or at least further proof would need to be made
public to prove certain statements are legal.

If anything you should consider me a friend, at least for the fact that
I have not started a group lawsuit campaign. I see no point in that
kind of talk at the current time. For the life of me, I was shocked to
hear you say that. Maybe you mean I am collecting or have been
gathering data from the past two years, and making it known in public.
If in fact this stock doesn't pay off at the same time the channel is
successful, then you would be correct.

As far as scaring investors with talk of lawsuits, you couldn't be more
wrong. I am the first person to defend any non-truths about TMM. I
defend them especially when I hear the word scam mentioned on the board.
You and I both know that simply is not the case.

My exit strategy would be a bit clearer if the company would follow
through with statements they make. I could then make better decisions,
especially if they just came out and put it all on the table. I could
then take that info, if it were factual, and determine my exit strategy.
Very hard to do given the current state of things, it is almost like the
company wants the longs to sell and move on. I will see this through
until the end, boom or bust.

"Established company with methods", are you sure we are talking about
TMM? The only methods I see are slight variations of the truth when
informing shareholders of what is currently transpiring. These are
hardly sound business methods, I would actually go so far as to say
half-truth updates.

I can't ask QTN/TMM to in fact change their way of doing things. I can
suggest/hope that they do right by us and keep their word to the
thousands of people and millions of dollars that have supported them.

Selling is not an option, nor is silencing my truthful criticisms of the
company on a public message board. It is in fact a service to all new
investors; message boards are for as much info about your investment as
is possible. It is real simple; people will quit firing shots at the
company, when Frank stops handing them the ammunition.

You seemed to have me pegged as a menace to the company, when in fact I
am just calling them to task. I will continue to do so until they
answer the shareholders. If TMM/QTN has grown as Frank claims, is it
not time to start acting like it on the business end?

I truly hope you have time to respond to this email, as I have tried to
highlight your comments and answer your questions and or assumptions
about me. I also hope you don't think ill of me after reading this, as
I was simply being honest in my sentences. You can rest assured that I
will continue to issue no blame to Equity Relations for QTN/TMM
mistakes, whether or not your "board monitors" update you on those
things in the future.

A good day to you sir and Happy Holidays to your family as well!!!!

Regards,

Clayton


-----Original Message-----
From: "Equity Relations, Inc."
Sent: Mon, 21 November 2005 15:46:41
To: clayton*mynetwire.com
Subject: RE:

Clayton,

I answer emails as they come in - Considering the thousands I receive a
week, there is always someone telling me I'm singling them out. This is
not the case.

I have not been on Ihub simply because I could not provide shareholders
with the answers to the questions they are looking for. I'm updated a
day or two before a release - The shareholders know almost as much as
about TMM as me at the present time.

Yes, I own shares in QBID and the PPS is just as discouraging to me as
it is to all the other shareholders. That said, I'm confident with the
current climate of the company. I believe they have some issues, but
all newer companies do (please know that is my opinion only and is not
intended as a pitch for the company. You should consult your Advisor
before making an investment decision)

My policy is not to discuss any company I represent with shareholders of
another company. It could be considered a conflict of interest.

Yes, The Company amended the A/S to 60 billion from 50 billion and I'm
told by Frank that it is to be used as collateral IF the bid on Mary
Hartman is accepted. I have not seen this in writing, but was verbally
told that is what it was for - Coincidentally, you were told that as
well during the conference call.

Also, I have Ihub and the like monitored and I must tell you I have not
seen too much defending of me on your part, but that's fine. What I see,
you are constantly beating on the company, questioning their every move
and scaring others with talks of lawsuits, etc. and that is by all means
your right to do.

My only question to you is what is your exit strategy? You clearly are
unhappy with your investment and more importantly, the company, but for
some reason you do not cut your losses and move on and again, that's
your right, but it seems to me that your position is quite frustrating
in that you are looking for an established company to change their
methods (whether good or bad) and adhere to what you think is right as
opposed to just selling.

Just curious?

Happy Holidays


Regards,


Richard Brown
Equity Relations, Inc.
Creating Synergy Between Company and Investor
Office: 617-314-7379
Email: Staff*equityrelations.com
Web: www.equityrelations.com
Please visit our website for company information and disclaimers


-----Original Message-----
From: clayton*mynetwire.com [mailto:clayton*mynetwire.com]
Sent: Monday, November 21, 2005 2:26 PM
To: staff*equityrelations.com
Subject:

Richard,

I notice you are answering many emails from other people, yet you have
not answered the last five I have sent. Is there a reason?

Is coming to iHUB been discouraged as of late? Do you own QBID shares
in the company? Is this your only job or do you represent other
companies as well?

I noticed you stating you are allowed to educate the shareholders about
public knowledge of the company. Well it is public knowledge the shares
were increased by 10 billion, do you know why that was needed?

I would greatly appreciate and respose I can get. I have stood up for
you when many have pointed fingers in your direction. I know better, I
know you tell us what Frank let's you tell us.

Regards,
Clayton
 
Posted by suzainiee on :
 
Just a thought.......or two.........


I don't have a clue about the percentage of QBID

stockholders who are also members of the gay

community (or QBID'S a/s, either).


However, my guess on the stockholders is at least 50%.


Seems to me, that any television network

designed for any specific, designated audience,

would advoid enticing their future audience to

buy network stock----unless there was going to

be a very positive finanical outcome for those

investors/future viewers.


Otherwise, watching the network could actually be

paying for a constant unpleasant reminder of a

sour deal.


Would a shrewed guy like Frank risk alienating so

many of his potential customers?

Without subscribers, networks ....................

GLTA
 
Posted by Bottomliner on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by suzainiee:
Just a thought...or two...GLTA

suz
Excellent thoughts: logical, rational, positive.
Thank you. [Cool]
 
Posted by suzainiee on :
 
Thanks,

IMO, Frank knows how to build a network.

When it's ready, he will put it on the market.

ALL publicity is not always good publicity.

lol, can you imagine the ruckus from all of the message boards--in person?
 
Posted by Bottomliner on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by QBID'n:
Sorry for the long post....

QBID'n
No apologies necessary ... well worth the time. Thank you. [Cool]
 
Posted by imakmony2005 on :
 
Suz, nice post, been thinking the same and yes it seems frank just does not care who he burns.
 
Posted by suzainiee on :
 
.........perhaps at this point, pps is not the major concern until the product is available.

Some people do have short memories--except concerning their money. Some people hold grudges, too.

However, when the pps starts moving up again, everyone will be smiling again.
 
Posted by Sam1959 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by QBID'n:
Sorry for the long post.

No need to apologize; reading that was well worth the effort.

Thanks for posting it.
 
Posted by imakmony2005 on :
 
Im in ready to take the lose are make the money.
 
Posted by Ligge on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by QBID'n:
Sorry for the long post....

Thank you for bringing that over here.
 
Posted by Sam1959 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by imakmony2005:
Im in ready to take the lose are make the money.

No comprende.
 
Posted by Bottomliner on :
 
suz
You have a PM. [Smile]
 
Posted by DWE on :
 
QBID is an overly hyped stock. Plenty of volume but no PPS increase. I believe QBID is going nowhere. That's just my opinion.
 
Posted by imakmony2005 on :
 
SAM1959, That means im all in, im willing to lose the last few grand i got in this just because ive been here that long. BL SO SAD.
 
Posted by sidhartha on :
 
I must admit, the correspondence between lobogotti and Richard does make me feel a little better, for what it's worth.
 
Posted by suzainiee on :
 
Got it, now you have one.
 
Posted by Penny-Trader on :
 
I agree very good post to bring over.

Richard is a profesional person. he can only tell us what he is allowed to know and convey.

thanks QBIDn good post.

Rod

quote:
Originally posted by Bottomliner:
quote:
Originally posted by QBID'n:
Sorry for the long post....

QBID'n
No apologies necessary ... well worth the time. Thank you. [Cool]


 
Posted by Penny-Trader on :
 
lol can you clearify this statement?


quote:
Originally posted by imakmony2005:
Im in ready to take the lose are make the money.


 
Posted by Penny-Trader on :
 
But your here just in case.

thats the spirit.

thanks for you support

Rod

quote:
Originally posted by DWE:
QBID is an overly hyped stock. Plenty of volume but no PPS increase. I believe QBID is going nowhere. That's just my opinion.


 
Posted by bmarley5780 on :
 
next qbid run - FCDH -
 
Posted by mjm2005 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Monopoly Money:
i got a reply from the email i sent, which apparently went to richard. He just said the usual, "As an outsourced investor relations Co., I am not privy to the day-to-day and or audit information. That said, I will forward your e-mail to management."

So if i get anything from QTN itself i shall let you know. But it was nice to at least get a reply from Someone, and looked to be early in the am as well.

Did anyone ever ask Richard for an email address to reach "management" directly... I mean sure, we have franko(a)qtelevision.com... but has anyone received an email back from that address yet???
 
Posted by MillerTIME on :
 
Notable 'Star Trek' TV and Film Personality Will Appear on 'On Q Live' to Promote His Current Performance in 'Equus' With the East West Players


BURBANK, Calif., Nov. 28 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- Q Television (See OTCBB Other: QBID), America's groundbreaking network for gays, lesbians, bisexuals and transgendered individuals (GLBT), has announced today that George Takei, best known for his portrayal of Mr. Sulu in the acclaimed television and film series "Star Trek" will appear as a guest on "On Q Live" Tuesday, November 29th. Takei will give a rare and candid interview on live television for the first time since coming out as a gay man and also talk about his current critically acclaimed performance in the East West Players' production of "Equus." "On Q Live," a daily variety talk show hosted by Saskia Weber and Joe Bechely, features interviews with fun and flamboyant guests and airs 7:30 PM EST/4:30 PM PST.
ADVERTISEMENT


Takei's leading performance in "Equus" with East West Players has received rave reviews by major publications and is currently running through December 4th at THE DAVID HENRY HWANG THEATER and is presented by the S. Mark Taper Foundation. East West Players, which was established in 1965, is known as the nation's premier Asian American theatre organization. For more information on "Equus" please visit www.eastwestplayers.org or call (213) 625-7000. Also check out www.georgetakei.com for the latest information on Mr. Takei.
 
Posted by Penny-Trader on :
 
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
GEORGE TAKEI TO APPEAR AS A GUEST ON Q TELEVISION NETWORK IN HIS FIRST LIVE TV
INTERVIEW SINCE "COMING OUT"

Notable "Star Trek" TV and Film Personality will appear on "On Q Live" to
promote his current performance in "Equus" with the East West Players

Burbank, CA - November 28, 2005 -- Q Television (See OTCBB Other: QBID),
America's groundbreaking network for gays, lesbians, bisexuals and transgendered
individuals (GLBT), has announced today that George Takei, best known for his
portrayal of Mr. Sulu in the acclaimed television and film series "Star Trek"
will appear as a guest on "On Q Live" Tuesday, November 29th. Takei will give a
rare and candid interview on live television for the first time since coming out
as a gay man and also talk about his current critically acclaimed performance in
the East West Players' production of "Equus." "On Q Live," a daily variety talk
show hosted by Saskia Weber and Joe Bechely, features interviews with fun and
flamboyant guests and airs 7:30 PM EST/4:30 PM PST.
Takei's leading performance in "Equus" with East West Players has received rave
reviews by major publications and is currently running through December 4th at
THE DAVID HENRY HWANG THEATER and is presented by the S. Mark Taper Foundation.
East West Players, which was established in 1965, is known as the nation's
premier Asian American theatre organization. For more information on "Equus"
please visit www.eastwestplayers.org or call (213) 625-7000. Also check out
www.georgetakei.com for the latest information on Mr. Takei.
About Q Television:
This 24/7 premium television network is organized to create, develop and feature
television programming for the gay and lesbian community, including live &
interactive content every weeknight, plus sports, information and entertainment.
While the company expects much of its subscriber base to be comprised of members
of the gay and lesbian population, management also believes that quality
programming about the gay and lesbian experience, designed to entertain, educate
and inform, will attract many other segments of the viewing public.

The company's programming is available on a subscription basis to those desiring
to subscribe. The network is telecast 24 hours per day, 7 days per week.
Providing distribution via satellite ensures availability of the network across
the United States, including Alaska, Hawaii and Puerto Rico. Q Television
Network is the official network of Gay Games® VII. The network is also
ad-supported. For further information on programming and subscriptions, please
visit www.qtelevision.com.

MEDIA CONTACT: Jim Strzalkowski
T: 818-338-3555 Email: jim*prioritypr.net

INVESTOR RELATIONS: Richard Brown
T: 617-314-7379 Email: Staff*EquityRelations.com
 
Posted by Penny-Trader on :
 
dam you beet me millertime

lol


rod
 
Posted by HossTrader on :
 
Dam. I got all excited about a news alert showing up for QBID, and it turns out to be Sulu on a talk show LMAO
 
Posted by Monopoly Money on :
 
QTN is going Star TREQ?
 
Posted by firefly on :
 
Beam me up Scotty
 
Posted by Penny-Trader on :
 
yes but he is coming out on Q

how appropriate lol

the Q space channel is on its way lol

Rod
 
Posted by Monopoly Money on :
 
not Scotty, WELSHY!!!!!!!!
 
Posted by bige2533 on :
 
Does this mean warp speed ahead for Q?

quote:
Originally posted by Penny-Trader:
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
GEORGE TAKEI TO APPEAR AS A GUEST ON Q TELEVISION NETWORK IN HIS FIRST LIVE TV
INTERVIEW SINCE "COMING OUT"

Notable "Star Trek" TV and Film Personality will appear on "On Q Live" to
promote his current performance in "Equus" with the East West Players

Burbank, CA - November 28, 2005 -- Q Television (See OTCBB Other: QBID),
America's groundbreaking network for gays, lesbians, bisexuals and transgendered
individuals (GLBT), has announced today that George Takei, best known for his
portrayal of Mr. Sulu in the acclaimed television and film series "Star Trek"
will appear as a guest on "On Q Live" Tuesday, November 29th. Takei will give a
rare and candid interview on live television for the first time since coming out
as a gay man and also talk about his current critically acclaimed performance in
the East West Players' production of "Equus." "On Q Live," a daily variety talk
show hosted by Saskia Weber and Joe Bechely, features interviews with fun and
flamboyant guests and airs 7:30 PM EST/4:30 PM PST.
Takei's leading performance in "Equus" with East West Players has received rave
reviews by major publications and is currently running through December 4th at
THE DAVID HENRY HWANG THEATER and is presented by the S. Mark Taper Foundation.
East West Players, which was established in 1965, is known as the nation's
premier Asian American theatre organization. For more information on "Equus"
please visit www.eastwestplayers.org or call (213) 625-7000. Also check out
www.georgetakei.com for the latest information on Mr. Takei.
About Q Television:
This 24/7 premium television network is organized to create, develop and feature
television programming for the gay and lesbian community, including live &
interactive content every weeknight, plus sports, information and entertainment.
While the company expects much of its subscriber base to be comprised of members
of the gay and lesbian population, management also believes that quality
programming about the gay and lesbian experience, designed to entertain, educate
and inform, will attract many other segments of the viewing public.

The company's programming is available on a subscription basis to those desiring
to subscribe. The network is telecast 24 hours per day, 7 days per week.
Providing distribution via satellite ensures availability of the network across
the United States, including Alaska, Hawaii and Puerto Rico. Q Television
Network is the official network of Gay Games® VII. The network is also
ad-supported. For further information on programming and subscriptions, please
visit www.qtelevision.com.

MEDIA CONTACT: Jim Strzalkowski
T: 818-338-3555 Email: jim*prioritypr.net

INVESTOR RELATIONS: Richard Brown
T: 617-314-7379 Email: Staff*EquityRelations.com


 
Posted by Penny-Trader on :
 
Q me up Scotty you sexy man you
 
Posted by Monopoly Money on :
 
Warp 7 Mr. Sulu and i mean yesturday [Smile]
 
Posted by firefly on :
 
I just got it in my e-amil too.
 
Posted by Monopoly Money on :
 
Damnit its WELSHY!!!!

quote:
Originally posted by Penny-Trader:
Q me up Scotty you sexy man you


 
Posted by HossTrader on :
 
I am trying to think of a non-crude joke mixing QTV and the phrase "going where no man has gone before", but darnit, all the funny ones just aren't right! [Big Grin]
 
Posted by firefly on :
 
Hoss, I think it will happen and I think Q will be making the jokes and will love it.
 
Posted by Sam1959 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by HossTrader:
I am trying to think of a non-crude joke mixing QTV and the phrase "going where no man has gone before", but darnit, all the funny ones just aren't right! [Big Grin]

LMAO!!! [Smile]
 
Posted by mjm2005 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Bottomliner:
quote:
Originally posted by QBID'n:
Sorry for the long post....

QBID'n
No apologies necessary ... well worth the time. Thank you. [Cool]

Gracias Clay...good read...My respect for Richard has grown greatly...I was getting tired of seeing the "not privy to that information" response...

So, seeing a response like that makes me happy that he's not just copying and pasting...
 
Posted by Ad astra on :
 
Takei will give arare and candid interview on live television for the first time since coming out as a gay man and also talk about his current critically acclaimed performance in
the East West Players' production of "Equus."
---------------------
Are you kidding me??? his most critically acclaimed performance was when he had to fence Captain Kirk!!!
 
Posted by QBID'n on :
 
HAHAHA Yeah!!!....man thats the spirit everybody!
Just listen to you all. Now this is the way it should be around here all the time. [Big Grin]

Excellent find MT!

And Rod you were right...the board is already beginning to buzz! hahaha [Big Grin]


quote:
Originally posted by Penny-Trader:

Just watch and see if this board is not buzzing with excitement before the end of the week again.

rod


 
Posted by QBID'n on :
 
Will be looking for my last mil this week. [Big Grin]

Goodnight all

[ November 28, 2005, 20:22: Message edited by: QBID'n ]
 
Posted by qnique on :
 
Wow, this news alone should get the pps to .10 tomorrow.
 
Posted by ddiesal on :
 
I dont get it, we read all these good press releases about who is on this show, that show , QTN is expanding in to all these new veiwing areas. Which is great. But how can a stock trade over a billion shares several times and not move cant get to half a penny they don't even update investor page on web site. There has got to a reverse split in the works and symbol change. But this is a penny
 
Posted by stockforfun on :
 
It never move ! It stay there .0005 forever. This stock trades over billion shares everyday for 1 month but still stay at .0005 !

Can't understand it !
 
Posted by Dew-it on :
 
IMO more fluff news... This is not a newsworthy PR. Besides I can't watch it on Dish. How many people on this board can watch this on QTN - just curious? What I want to know is where the hell is the audit? This must be our bone for the week and it probably means no audit news. [Frown]
 
Posted by ddiesal on :
 
Exactly, can anyone compare this kind of volume and the price to any other stock in the past ( oh lets say since the beginning of stock trading). That ended up with happy ending.
 
Posted by firefly on :
 
Anyone looks at Gay Games lately?
http://www.gaygameschicago.org/
 
Posted by Ad astra on :
 
IMO more fluff news... This is not a newsworthy PR.

-------------

I disagree. The Q is media...it's core function is to create content specific to its intended audience. Eyeballs=Subscription and Ad Rev$$$...increased PPS.

You get those eyeballs by attracting interest. I've listened to Takei on Howard Stern before and he is a pretty charismatic--albeit eccentric--guest to have.

To me, this type of content is also sex-agnostic...i'm hetero but like to see interviews and updates from folks like Takei because I grew up watching Star Trek and have always been a fan, and not because of his sexual preference.

If The Q was avail in DC--specifically on Comcast--i'd buy a monthtly subscription much like I have after i invested in SIRI. I suspect many are in the same boat.

Have a good night all. Let's hope we hear some noise in the next few days...
 
Posted by QBID'n on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Dew-it:
IMO more fluff news... This is not a newsworthy PR. Besides I can't watch it on Dish. How many people on this board can watch this on QTN - just curious? What I want to know is where the hell is the audit? This must be our bone for the week and it probably means no audit news. [Frown]

Just hang in there Dew. [Wink]
 
Posted by Jennifercd10 on :
 
Do you think Q could build a show around Takei? What would it be like? Would anyone watch? Gay? Straight??? Internatiinal? What would the advertisers think?
 
Posted by mjm2005 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by qnique:
Wow, this news alone should get the pps to .10 tomorrow.

Sarcasm is not permitted as per the terms of service...
 
Posted by Ad astra on :
 
Jennifer--I would laugh my butt off if he had a reality show...ha!

"Talking with Takei" or

"Take Out Takei" or

Ah the possibilities...lol.
 
Posted by Jennifercd10 on :
 
Next topic:

QBID:XXXIV Where no gay has gone before
 
Posted by davidjanas on :
 
jen pm me
 
Posted by mjm2005 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Jennifercd10:
Next topic:

QBID:XXXIV Where no gay has gone before

Damn, already talks of a new thread Jen? Last time we were well over a 100 pages before that happened... haha

Although, this thread wouldn't have lasted long if the audit came out immediately afterward...so 34 is soon to happen...
 
Posted by Jennifercd10 on :
 
Just a thought for next thread
 
Posted by mjm2005 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Jennifercd10:
Just a thought for next thread

Oh, haha Jen...that wasn't meant as an attack...

My fault if it came off like that...I was just getting excited...I hope for the audit everyday, so I'm just waiting...
 
Posted by mjm2005 on :
 
IHUB---

Posted by: robertmic71
In reply to: None
Date:11/28/2005 7:48:26 PM
Post #of 191026

Found on Planetout message board. Good news from other viewers building up. Hope...


Q Television!....Jack E. Jett is too funny...5 stars. redWineInmynavl Sun Nov 27 07:05:50 PST 2005


Jack E. is too funny and QTN Worldnews has been good to come to. Q is just the station I've been wanting for for a very very long time.
 
Posted by Jennifercd10 on :
 
I think that Q is targeted at the middle of the "bell" curve of gay life.
 
Posted by QBID'n on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by firefly:
Anyone looks at Gay Games lately?
http://www.gaygameschicago.org/

Glad to see the GG going to Cologne!

Prediction: QTN eventually makes long programming deal with PinkTV + GG2010 in Cologne = Televised Rights likely for PinkTV thus benefitting QTN

Just the possibility of more future exposure.
 
Posted by Mark J T on :
 
jenn You own that many shares (264M) You think this is a good stock i own some shares but not that much. Is it just your own feelings that is company will do good?
 
Posted by QBID'n on :
 
PM mjm
 
Posted by Doctoall on :
 
PinkTV 11/14/05


Dear Sir,

Thank you for your email and for your support to PinkTV. We are indeed in discussions with Q Television to see what could be done between our two channels. Nevertheless, at that stage I cannot really tell which programs are in the pipe.

As a Q Television shareholder, I invite you to catch up with Q, I am sure they might be able to give you more information regarding all this.

I hope to have been able to answer your question,

Have a pleasant end of day,
Truly yours,
Mickael
Mickaël Pradignac
Direction of Marketing & Communication
PinkTV
20-22 rue de Turenne
75004 Paris
Tél.+33(0)1 55 80 77 17 / 74 31 (direct)
Mob. +33(0)6 14 43 07 95
mpradignac*pinktv.fr
TVA intracommunautaire : FR 844 3829 7046
 
Posted by QBID'n on :
 
Good to have you back Doc.
 
Posted by mjm2005 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by QBID'n:
PM mjm

I double PM'ed you... touche!
 
Posted by firefly on :
 
Hi Doc good to see you.
 
Posted by Bigrod40 on :
 
[Big Grin] Heres Georgies coming out story: I wonder if Frankie Boy has an interest in this guy on a personal level....LOL

http://www.georgetakei.com/la-times.asp
 
Posted by Hammer on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Mark J T:
jenn You own that many shares (264M) You think this is a good stock i own some shares but not that much. Is it just your own feelings that is company will do good?

Mark,

Man, what do you expect anyone to say who is that deep into this stock. You would be wise to steer clear of it if you value your money.
 
Posted by realmoney2 on :
 
George Takei is bigger than you might think. Howard Stern LOVES to goof on him. I would bet that they will get a tape of that appearance and do something with it. Just a hunch. If Stern makes a mention of Q, that would be FAN-tastic!
 
Posted by firefly on :
 
Comcast digital vod has a huge data base and big band width. I was trying to find here! I know it is here but a pain to find.
 
Posted by Doctoall on :
 
Great to be back. lurking while on vacation but not the same as posting [Big Grin]
 
Posted by QBID'n on :
 
So now Letterman has had both QTN and George Takei for his "Top10" list.

Hummm...wonder what might be the outcome of writing to the show and telling David that George is to appear on QTN?....maybe another "Top 10" list. [Big Grin]
 
Posted by firefly on :
 
I want to see Scotty Withers on the Tonight Show.
That would be huge. He can pull it off too. Meet him in person. He is a pro and damn smart.
 
Posted by DIGDOUGH on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by imakmony2005:
Im in ready to take the lose are make the money. HIIICCUP!!!


 
Posted by Marty on :
 
record volume.....no PPS movement.....the MM's have all the shares they need......guess who's making money on those trades?......LOL...(HINT: not any new or old shareholders [Wink]
 
Posted by DIGDOUGH on :
 
He came out over a week ago on other media networks, I think he was on MSN.

quote:
Originally posted by Penny-Trader:
yes but he is coming out on Q

how appropriate lol

the Q space channel is on its way lol

Rod


 
Posted by Marty on :
 
And while you weren't looking:
quote:
Originally posted by Marty:
A stock, is only as good as the company, and it's market/objectives, and is only as good as the management that runs it....
So,
A = business plan/companies market/objectves
(potential income) per year
B = obtainable market share (potentially, 5bill) per year
C = actual market share per year
D = debt/expenses per month (burn rate)
E = Gross revenue per year
F = Net revenue per year

So, if A = 5bill, then
B = 5000000000
C = companies shareof market...let's say 1%
1% of 5bill = 50000000
D = 1mill x 12 = 12mill (approximate burn rate, per month)
E = 12mill
F = 50000000 - 12000000 = 38000000

This leaves an unaudited income of
38mill per year (assuming 1%)

G = A/S (shares) = 50000000000 (assumed)
H = F / G = 38000000 / 50000000000 = 0.00076

H = 0.00076 per share, based on income

This doesn't take into account, other income, assets or potential market cap. You decide. (It's all congecture and hypothessis, and) JMHO, take it or leave it....GLTA...


 
Posted by Marty on :
 
Oh, and BTW, it's 60BILL now, as someone pointed out....that would make it just about right for how the MM's are playing this.....GLTA....
 
Posted by DIGDOUGH on :
 
Marty- How do you know if the A/S is 60Bil now? Doesn't my vote count?
 
Posted by firefly on :
 
Lot's of shares big volume but not that much money at.0004
 
Posted by Marty on :
 
Of course your vote counts....MT pointed out, as well as someone else, (sorry, I don't remember the post), that Richard confirmed a 10bill increase...looking....and will post update....
quote:
Originally posted by DIGDOUGH:
Marty- How do you know if the A/S is 60Bil now? Doesn't my vote count?


 
Posted by DIGDOUGH on :
 
Somebody's making money. It just isn't us.

quote:
Originally posted by firefly:
Lot's of shares big volume but not that much money at.0004


 
Posted by firefly on :
 
Agree Dig
 
Posted by HossTrader on :
 
Since this is a gay channel, instead of calling them "fluff" prs, how does "Flare", or "glitter" sound? [Big Grin]


Here is another source about the planetout/qtv deal. Same info, just different interview apparently.
http://www.clickz.com/news/article.php/3566166
 
Posted by firefly on :
 
Hoss, That would cost alot of money. Maria would probably buy Q first.
http://www.glittermovie.com/
 
Posted by HossTrader on :
 
LMAO It scares me that a website for that movie is still up and running.
 
Posted by Marty on :
 
And a revision......
Now we're looking at 60bill vs. 50 bill, assuming same....

A stock, is only as good as the company, and it's market/objectives, and is only as good as the management that runs it....
So,
A = business plan/companies market/objectves
(potential income) per year
B = obtainable market share (potentially, 5bill) per year
C = actual market share per year
D = debt/expenses per month (burn rate)
E = Gross revenue per year
F = Net revenue per year

So, if A = 5bill, then
B = 5000000000
C = companies shareof market...let's say 1%
1% of 5bill = 50000000
D = 1mill x 12 = 12mill (approximate burn rate, per month)
E = 12mill
F = 50000000 - 12000000 = 38000000

This leaves an unaudited income of
38mill per year (assuming 1%)

G = A/S (shares) = 60000000000 (assumed)
H = F / G = 38000000 / 60000000000 = 0.00063

H = 0.00063 per share, based on income

This doesn't take into account, other income, assets or potential market cap. You decide. (It's all congecture and hypothessis, and) JMHO, take it or leave it....GLTA...
 
Posted by firefly on :
 
She has done well. Good for her. Smart person and driven. Good for you Mariah.
 
Posted by Penny-Trader on :
 
I love my SIRI radio.


quote:
Originally posted by Ad astra:
IMO more fluff news... This is not a newsworthy PR.

-------------

I disagree. The Q is media...it's core function is to create content specific to its intended audience. Eyeballs=Subscription and Ad Rev$$$...increased PPS.

You get those eyeballs by attracting interest. I've listened to Takei on Howard Stern before and he is a pretty charismatic--albeit eccentric--guest to have.

To me, this type of content is also sex-agnostic...i'm hetero but like to see interviews and updates from folks like Takei because I grew up watching Star Trek and have always been a fan, and not because of his sexual preference.

If The Q was avail in DC--specifically on Comcast--i'd buy a monthtly subscription much like I have after i invested in SIRI. I suspect many are in the same boat.

Have a good night all. Let's hope we hear some noise in the next few days...


 
Posted by firefly on :
 
siri as in stern?
 
Posted by DIGDOUGH on :
 
It's been said that "all that glitters is gold". [Wink]
 
Posted by firefly on :
 
whatch out for mica lol.
 
Posted by Penny-Trader on :
 
Way off topic but important none the less

this is our prime minister that legalisied gay marriage in canada

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20051129/ap_on_re_ca/canada_elections

TORONTO - A corruption scandal forced a vote of no-confidence Monday that toppled Prime Minister Paul Martin's minority government, triggering an unusual election campaign during the Christmas holidays.

ADVERTISEMENT

Canada's three opposition parties, which control a majority in Parliament, voted against Martin's government, claiming his Liberal Party no longer has the moral authority to lead the nation
 
Posted by Sam1959 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Marty:
Of course your vote counts....MT pointed out, as well as someone else, (sorry, I don't remember the post), that Richard confirmed a 10bill increase...looking....and will post update....

Richard confirmed was that the Authorized shares have been increased to 60 Billion, not that the Outstanding Shares had been increased. In the email posted by QBID'n November 28, 2005 14:46 Richard stated:
quote:
Yes, The Company amended the A/S to 60 billion from 50 billion and I'm
told by Frank that it is to be used as collateral IF the bid on Mary Hartman is accepted.

He also quoted what Frank had said and then said:
quote:
This specifically states he will not raise the O/S w/out shareholder
approval - It says nothing about amending the A/S for preparation. With
due respect, in business you must be prepared if an opportunity presents
itself.

Now, if Frank does not come to shareholders with the vote if he
purchases MH then you have an argument, but as of now he has done
nothing wrong.

I know that normally when the A/S increased, it is followed shortly thereafter by an increase in the O/S, but it doesn’t have to happen that way. We have been told, and I choose to believe that Frank got the A/S increased “to be used as collateral IF the bid on Mary Hartman is accepted.”
 
Posted by Penny-Trader on :
 
Not till January 1st for stern but ya thats the one.

lol

quote:
Originally posted by firefly:
siri as in stern?


 
Posted by firefly on :
 
Sam, This is a pink, non reporting. I don't expect letter in my mail box regarding a vote to buy Mary Hartman. How would he do this? Over the internet?
 
Posted by firefly on :
 
Rod, if I werent' so broke I would buy some siri. Comcast vod stern too.
 
Posted by Sam1959 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by firefly:
Sam, This is a pink, non reporting. I don't expect letter in my mail box regarding a vote to buy Mary Hartman. How would he do this? Over the internet?

I don’t know how, but I know that it is possible, and that is what he said he would do. Maybe I’m gullible, but I like to believe people are honest until they prove me wrong.
 
Posted by firefly on :
 
Sam, Good luck but as long as this stock gives no mailings to the shareholders imo it is a crap shoot.
I have been in for almost 2 years and have sold none. Down on paper but have seen gowth within the network. Still want to see what I own. QBID needs to report.
 
Posted by RNINALVNG on :
 
Sam(fly), Rod and Doc...you guys still at it, huh? I had to take a double dose of Geritol to stay awake this late....lol...Doc, sorry about the game...#89 is your son-in-law...no?...having a great year...good team player.

Maybe we'll see an extraordinary PR this week...maybe that will be enough to move it...we can only hope.

Have a good evening gentlemen.
 
Posted by firefly on :
 
LOL Terry
 
Posted by Sam1959 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by firefly:
Sam, Good luck but as long as this stock gives no mailings to the shareholders imo it is a crap shoot.
I have been in for almost 2 years and have sold none. Down on paper but have seen gowth within the network. Still want to see what I own. QBID needs to report.

Thanks. I don't think we’re that different; I have been invested in QBID stock since May of 2004 and have watched my initial investment drop by -93.2% without selling a single share, so I understand how it feels to be down (quite a bit) on paper.

Knowing that the network is real and growing very well is what keeps me going and I will soon get my chance to see what I am invested in as I recently received the new channel lineup for Cox San Diego and see that QTN will be on channel 399 starting December 7th.

Oh yeah--I couldn’t agree with you more on your point that QBID needs to report.
 
Posted by firefly on :
 
Sam , can you subscribe to QTN? You are in Diego.
tia
 
Posted by Sam1959 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by firefly:
Sam , can you subscribe to QTN? You are in Diego.
tia

Yes I can and I plan to as soon as possible.

What does tia mean?
 
Posted by HossTrader on :
 
This could play right into Q's business model, or the cost increase across the board could potentially reduce subscriptions....


FCC to reverse course on cable: WSJ
By MarketWatch
Last Update: 1:25 AM ET Nov. 29, 2005

SAN FRANCISCO (MarketWatch) -- The Federal Communications Commission is set to reverse course and suggest cable TV companies could best serve consumers by letting them subscribe to individual channels instead of prepackaged bundles, according to a media report Tuesday.

FCC Chairman Kevin Martin is expected to announce Tuesday at a Senate hearing that the FCC will soon reissue its review of cable industry "a la carte" pricing with a different conclusion, The Wall Street Journal reported in its online edition, citing an unnamed FCC official familiar with the report. See Wall Street Journal story (Subscription required)

While the original report concluded that consumers would pay more for individual channels, the new one concludes they could pay less, The Journal said.

A spokesman for the National Cable & Telecommunications Association said the cable-industry lobbying group would have no comment until it had time to review the new report, The Journal reported.

Earlier this year, Martin expressed concerns about the earlier report and asked the FCC staff to review it, the Journal said. The staff concluded the original report relied in part on faulty analysis of data, The Journal said, citing an unnamed FCC official.

A year ago, an initial report concluded that consumers would save money on an a la carte plan only if they subscribed to fewer than nine channels, the Journal said. The average cable subscriber watches 17 channels, the FCC staff found, suggesting a rate increase of anywhere from 14% to 30%, according to The Journal said.

Martin's reported policy change concerns the cable industry, partly because it opens a new front in the government's efforts to impose indecency standards on cable and satellite provider, The Journal said.

Until now, the cable industry has resisted suggestions from Martin and some lawmakers to voluntarily offer a la carte choices or set up a "family-friendly tier" of channels suitable for children, the Journal said. By suggesting that consumers won't necessarily pay more for individual channels, the report calls into question the cable industry's revenue model, according to the story.

While the FCC can't force the cable industry to change its business model, its voice will add considerable weight to the debate and could embolden lawmakers eager to give consumers, particularly parents, more control over which television programming enters their homes.

Aside from the technical challenge of offering hundreds of channels on an individual basis, cable programmers and operators say such a switch would raise costs and reduce choices for consumers, the Journal reported. That's because, they say, pooling a group of channels into one cable package effectively lowers the cost of offering all of the channels.
 
Posted by RNINALVNG on :
 
Thanks in Advance...
 
Posted by firefly on :
 
Thanks Sam,,btw I am Sam too lol. This must be fun to see your network in action. It is strange to me that Britehouse in Birmingham got Q before Comcast in ATL. Oh well go figure.
 
Posted by HossTrader on :
 
See yall in the morning.

How do you like my new sig? LOL
 
Posted by firefly on :
 
tia is thanks in advance. sam
 
Posted by firefly on :
 
I like hoss. the new sig [Smile]
 
Posted by Sam1959 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by firefly:
Thanks Sam,,btw I am Sam too lol. This must be fun to see your network in action. It is strange to me that Britehouse in Birmingham got Q before Comcast in ATL. Oh well go figure.

It's kind of funny talking to someone with the same name, isn’t it? I work with the Navy and have an email account with them; the global email directory on that network is so large that there are three other guys with the same first AND last names as me, so we end up getting each other's email all the time and have to forward things to each other.

Anyway, with a name like that you can't be all that bad! [Wink]
 
Posted by firefly on :
 
LOL Green eggs and ham. Defentantly in the Sam club.
 
Posted by Sam1959 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by firefly:
LOL Green eggs and ham. Defentantly in the Sam club.

I hear ya. Well, I gotta call it a night.

Talk to ya later.
 
Posted by Optimus Prime on :
 
This A/S argument is getting out of hand. Lets try this in terms that everyone will understand:

Lets say you have multiple credit cards

Card 1 Credit Line $30,000 Balance $4000
Card 2 Credit Line $10,000 Balance $ 500
Card 3 Credit Line $ 5,000 Balance $ 0
Card 4 Credit Line $25,000 Balance $5000

By everybody's logic here, you are in debt for $70,000. Never mind you didn't use all of your credit line and really owe $9500. That is just a bunch of bull. All caluculations should use the 45B O/S until we are told otherwise.

Look, I am NOT happy that Frank increased the A/S. But until I see PROOF that the O/S is 60,000,000,000, then it is just a "credit line" at our expense. And I believe that the majority of shareholders will vote no on Mary Hartman. I want that audit bad too, but I don't think we'll see it for a couple of months. Just my opinion and I REALLY hope that I am wrong.

As far as the DVD goes, I hope they save their money and foget about it. But if it is really coming, IMO, they are waiting for a major announcement that they can put in the DVD before release to investors. What makes anybody think the DVD is only for us? It could be for eventual institutonal investors (if we ever get out of our current pps mess).

As far as doing business with a pink sheet company, I was jsut going over a list of pinks and found out that my employer, the nations largest defense contractor with 135,000 employees and sales of over $30B a year, uses Navigant as the SOLE travel agent for the company. We are not allowed to make travel arrangements through any other source but this company unless we have VP approval. The symbol is FLYR.PK. I couldn't believe it when I saw it but I don't think my company would do business with them if they weren't legit. So not all PK are bad.
 
Posted by mjm2005 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by mjm2005:
IHUB---

Posted by: robertmic71
In reply to: None
Date:11/28/2005 7:48:26 PM
Post #of 191026

Found on Planetout message board. Good news from other viewers building up. Hope...


Q Television!....Jack E. Jett is too funny...5 stars. redWineInmynavl Sun Nov 27 07:05:50 PST 2005


Jack E. is too funny and QTN Worldnews has been good to come to. Q is just the station I've been wanting for for a very very long time.

FYI--- It's supposed to be "good to come home to"...I copied it wrong...my fault
 
Posted by mjm2005 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by mjm2005:
quote:
Originally posted by QBID'n:
PM mjm

I double PM'ed you... touche!
sent you a few more now too...sorry I didn't get to them until now... mea culpa
 
Posted by mjm2005 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Sam1959:
quote:
Originally posted by firefly:
Sam , can you subscribe to QTN? You are in Diego.
tia

Yes I can and I plan to as soon as possible.

What does tia mean?

"Thanks in advance"???
 
Posted by mjm2005 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Optimus Prime:
This A/S argument is getting out of hand. Lets try this in terms that everyone will understand:

Lets say you have multiple credit cards

Card 1 Credit Line $30,000 Balance $4000
Card 2 Credit Line $10,000 Balance $ 500
Card 3 Credit Line $ 5,000 Balance $ 0
Card 4 Credit Line $25,000 Balance $5000

By everybody's logic here, you are in debt for $70,000. Never mind you didn't use all of your credit line and really owe $9500. That is just a bunch of bull. All caluculations should use the 45B O/S until we are told otherwise.

Look, I am NOT happy that Frank increased the A/S. But until I see PROOF that the O/S is 60,000,000,000, then it is just a "credit line" at our expense. And I believe that the majority of shareholders will vote no on Mary Hartman. I want that audit bad too, but I don't think we'll see it for a couple of months. Just my opinion and I REALLY hope that I am wrong.

As far as the DVD goes, I hope they save their money and foget about it. But if it is really coming, IMO, they are waiting for a major announcement that they can put in the DVD before release to investors. What makes anybody think the DVD is only for us? It could be for eventual institutonal investors (if we ever get out of our current pps mess).

As far as doing business with a pink sheet company, I was jsut going over a list of pinks and found out that my employer, the nations largest defense contractor with 135,000 employees and sales of over $30B a year, uses Navigant as the SOLE travel agent for the company. We are not allowed to make travel arrangements through any other source but this company unless we have VP approval. The symbol is FLYR.PK. I couldn't believe it when I saw it but I don't think my company would do business with them if they weren't legit. So not all PK are bad.

Ooooh, and FLYR is trading at close to $11 too...
 
Posted by Wangdo on :
 
Squawk Box is talking about this on CNBC, they are split on this. they said something like ESPN would be 2.50 a month to get. I would like to see a network breakdown.

quote:
Originally posted by HossTrader:
This could play right into Q's business model, or the cost increase across the board could potentially reduce subscriptions....


FCC to reverse course on cable: WSJ
By MarketWatch
Last Update: 1:25 AM ET Nov. 29, 2005

SAN FRANCISCO (MarketWatch) -- The Federal Communications Commission is set to reverse course and suggest cable TV companies could best serve consumers by letting them subscribe to individual channels instead of prepackaged bundles, according to a media report Tuesday.

FCC Chairman Kevin Martin is expected to announce Tuesday at a Senate hearing that the FCC will soon reissue its review of cable industry "a la carte" pricing with a different conclusion, The Wall Street Journal reported in its online edition, citing an unnamed FCC official familiar with the report. See Wall Street Journal story (Subscription required)

While the original report concluded that consumers would pay more for individual channels, the new one concludes they could pay less, The Journal said.

A spokesman for the National Cable & Telecommunications Association said the cable-industry lobbying group would have no comment until it had time to review the new report, The Journal reported.

Earlier this year, Martin expressed concerns about the earlier report and asked the FCC staff to review it, the Journal said. The staff concluded the original report relied in part on faulty analysis of data, The Journal said, citing an unnamed FCC official.

A year ago, an initial report concluded that consumers would save money on an a la carte plan only if they subscribed to fewer than nine channels, the Journal said. The average cable subscriber watches 17 channels, the FCC staff found, suggesting a rate increase of anywhere from 14% to 30%, according to The Journal said.

Martin's reported policy change concerns the cable industry, partly because it opens a new front in the government's efforts to impose indecency standards on cable and satellite provider, The Journal said.

Until now, the cable industry has resisted suggestions from Martin and some lawmakers to voluntarily offer a la carte choices or set up a "family-friendly tier" of channels suitable for children, the Journal said. By suggesting that consumers won't necessarily pay more for individual channels, the report calls into question the cable industry's revenue model, according to the story.

While the FCC can't force the cable industry to change its business model, its voice will add considerable weight to the debate and could embolden lawmakers eager to give consumers, particularly parents, more control over which television programming enters their homes.

Aside from the technical challenge of offering hundreds of channels on an individual basis, cable programmers and operators say such a switch would raise costs and reduce choices for consumers, the Journal reported. That's because, they say, pooling a group of channels into one cable package effectively lowers the cost of offering all of the channels.


 
Posted by Wangdo on :
 
OP....Great analogy, just because it's there you don't have to use it. Frank has the extra shares just incase and if he doesn't use them by the alloted time the shares are no longer available.

quote:
Originally posted by Optimus Prime:
This A/S argument is getting out of hand. Lets try this in terms that everyone will understand:

Lets say you have multiple credit cards

Card 1 Credit Line $30,000 Balance $4000
Card 2 Credit Line $10,000 Balance $ 500
Card 3 Credit Line $ 5,000 Balance $ 0
Card 4 Credit Line $25,000 Balance $5000

By everybody's logic here, you are in debt for $70,000. Never mind you didn't use all of your credit line and really owe $9500. That is just a bunch of bull. All caluculations should use the 45B O/S until we are told otherwise.

Look, I am NOT happy that Frank increased the A/S. But until I see PROOF that the O/S is 60,000,000,000, then it is just a "credit line" at our expense. And I believe that the majority of shareholders will vote no on Mary Hartman. I want that audit bad too, but I don't think we'll see it for a couple of months. Just my opinion and I REALLY hope that I am wrong.

As far as the DVD goes, I hope they save their money and foget about it. But if it is really coming, IMO, they are waiting for a major announcement that they can put in the DVD before release to investors. What makes anybody think the DVD is only for us? It could be for eventual institutonal investors (if we ever get out of our current pps mess).

As far as doing business with a pink sheet company, I was jsut going over a list of pinks and found out that my employer, the nations largest defense contractor with 135,000 employees and sales of over $30B a year, uses Navigant as the SOLE travel agent for the company. We are not allowed to make travel arrangements through any other source but this company unless we have VP approval. The symbol is FLYR.PK. I couldn't believe it when I saw it but I don't think my company would do business with them if they weren't legit. So not all PK are bad.


 
Posted by Clyde_Crashcup on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Optimus Prime:
This A/S argument is getting out of hand. Lets try this in terms that everyone will understand:

Lets say you have multiple credit cards

Card 1 Credit Line $30,000 Balance $4000
Card 2 Credit Line $10,000 Balance $ 500
Card 3 Credit Line $ 5,000 Balance $ 0
Card 4 Credit Line $25,000 Balance $5000

By everybody's logic here, you are in debt for $70,000. Never mind you didn't use all of your credit line and really owe $9500. That is just a bunch of bull. All caluculations should use the 45B O/S until we are told otherwise.

Look, I am NOT happy that Frank increased the A/S. But until I see PROOF that the O/S is 60,000,000,000, then it is just a "credit line" at our expense. And I believe that the majority of shareholders will vote no on Mary Hartman. I want that audit bad too, but I don't think we'll see it for a couple of months. Just my opinion and I REALLY hope that I am wrong.

As far as the DVD goes, I hope they save their money and foget about it. But if it is really coming, IMO, they are waiting for a major announcement that they can put in the DVD before release to investors. What makes anybody think the DVD is only for us? It could be for eventual institutonal investors (if we ever get out of our current pps mess).

As far as doing business with a pink sheet company, I was jsut going over a list of pinks and found out that my employer, the nations largest defense contractor with 135,000 employees and sales of over $30B a year, uses Navigant as the SOLE travel agent for the company. We are not allowed to make travel arrangements through any other source but this company unless we have VP approval. The symbol is FLYR.PK. I couldn't believe it when I saw it but I don't think my company would do business with them if they weren't legit. So not all PK are bad.

I think this means that Frank is fat and happy and cares less about the share holder. Call it what you want. Frank is irresponsible when it comes to delivering timelines. He's just not that disciplined. Like I said before, "It's just the way he is" Love him or leave him.
 
Posted by Dustoff101 on :
 
Personaly, I don't agree with the Timeline theory simply because of the obvious downside..

Example: Sell um into the buyers now and get her done.

Also, he may be getting a real attitude towards shareholders, and figures *Heck if they did'nt sell into runs* it's they're own damn fault..

We may see a situation here where the CEO plans to milk the share printing machine, while still increasing revenue....

I have never seen a CEO so involved in the goings on of message boards and what is said on them...

Just something I thought about when reading some of the posting..

Anybody else have the same hunch?
 
Posted by noah129 on :
 
good morning qbidians good luck today lets hope for a run soon as this volume is to me indicating someone knows something that i dont.

usually the smart money gets in and then a run comes along.im not sure if this is the case but im betting that we get an audit by the end of the week.just speculating but i think its coming and someone is stocking up bigtime. i hope i am right but qbid has been a frustrating stock for so long that it is likely to trade at these levels for a while.

best of luck to you all sincrely your qbidiot.

20 million long and strong.
 
Posted by buckwheatbob on :
 
Interesting article from Reuters this morning:

Welcome to the Reuters Before the Bell Newsmail.

Wall Street has confidence in confidence - consumer confidence, that is. Stock futures are pointing up as investors expect Conference Board data after the opening bell will show shoppers are more comfortable about spending their money in this holiday season than they were in October.

But plenty of other numbers are on the way. Economists expect new homes sales to show some deceleration in October, with orders for big-ticket items like refrigerators and cars on an upswing.

The dollar edged up against the yen and the euro in hopes that the data will cement expectations of rising U.S. interest rates. U.S. Treasuries are flat.

Oil prices are hovering around $57 a barrel after OPEC bent over backwards to assure consumers they would have enough fuel for the winter.

In other precious commodities, gold rose above $500 a troy ounce for the first time since the 1980s.

Cable viewers, take note. The Wall Street Journal says the FCC is poised to suggest that cable systems give customers the option of subscribing to individual channels rather than packages.

And insurer Cigna is expanding its online pricing data for consumers to include services provided by hospitals, doctors and other health care providers.

Until tomorrow,
Lisa Von Ahn
Newsmail Editor
 
Posted by noah129 on :
 
hey millertime any premarket action yet? level 2 lineup please. thanx in advance.
 
Posted by MillerTIME on :
 
premarket....

.0004x.0005
10x9
 
Posted by noah129 on :
 
thanx millertime. anyone care to make some predictions on pps by the end of the year?

im gonna be a radical pumper and say we close the year at .0032 heheh wouldn that be sweet!!!
 
Posted by Ad astra on :
 
Hang me out to dry if you like...but i'm thinking the shares that are being dumped are being picked up by The Q.

I bet we see the Audit combined with mention of a reduction of sharecount due to a buyback.

I'll wager a phaser, a tribble and a vulcan mind meld i'm right.

I won't, however, wager when we see this. Hopefully by mid-Dec.
 
Posted by Peaser01 on :
 
I'm guessing .0002

Sorry to say, but it's my honest opinion.
 
Posted by NYstockLouver on :
 
Extended Hours (More info...)
Last Price Last Size Bid (Size) Ask (Size) Extended Hours

0.012 80,000 0(x0) 0(x0)
Pre-open Quote (Real-time) OTC


TRIANGLE MULTI MEDIA
E-TRADE has QBID as .012 pre-market
Did something big happen or is this a mistake.

Thanks Matt
 
Posted by Ad astra on :
 
End of Year: .0014
 
Posted by a4realguy on :
 
It's a mistake... still no audit... still SSDD.
 
Posted by noah129 on :
 
wow its quiet in here today is the qbidian army giving up or are we all just waiting for something to talk about ?
 
Posted by Maestro232 on :
 
We're sick of reading all of these pages of rotgut, so we wait for real news.
 
Posted by airdoo on :
 
i'm not giving up but i decided to invest some of my available funds elswhere. so i won't be adding to my 2+ million qbid shares. i love GTE lately. i know it's not a penny or a micro but it's been treating me right lately. you guys should at least check it out.
 
Posted by Ad astra on :
 
The quiet before the storm.
 
Posted by HossTrader on :
 
It is a trade off. With no news we either don't say anything, or go waaaaay off topic. [Smile]
 
Posted by Ad astra on :
 
lol, sorry. Should have ended with a ? instead of a period in my last post.
 
Posted by kaos on :
 
good morning everyone....just curious....has anyone been able to buy at .0004
[Roll Eyes]
 
Posted by mjm2005 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Wangdo:
Squawk Box is talking about this on CNBC, they are split on this. they said something like ESPN would be 2.50 a month to get. I would like to see a network breakdown.

quote:
Originally posted by HossTrader:
This could play right into Q's business model, or the cost increase across the board could potentially reduce subscriptions....


FCC to reverse course on cable: WSJ
By MarketWatch
Last Update: 1:25 AM ET Nov. 29, 2005

SAN FRANCISCO (MarketWatch) -- The Federal Communications Commission is set to reverse course and suggest cable TV companies could best serve consumers by letting them subscribe to individual channels instead of prepackaged bundles, according to a media report Tuesday.

FCC Chairman Kevin Martin is expected to announce Tuesday at a Senate hearing that the FCC will soon reissue its review of cable industry "a la carte" pricing with a different conclusion, The Wall Street Journal reported in its online edition, citing an unnamed FCC official familiar with the report. See Wall Street Journal story (Subscription required)

While the original report concluded that consumers would pay more for individual channels, the new one concludes they could pay less, The Journal said.

A spokesman for the National Cable & Telecommunications Association said the cable-industry lobbying group would have no comment until it had time to review the new report, The Journal reported.

Earlier this year, Martin expressed concerns about the earlier report and asked the FCC staff to review it, the Journal said. The staff concluded the original report relied in part on faulty analysis of data, The Journal said, citing an unnamed FCC official.

A year ago, an initial report concluded that consumers would save money on an a la carte plan only if they subscribed to fewer than nine channels, the Journal said. The average cable subscriber watches 17 channels, the FCC staff found, suggesting a rate increase of anywhere from 14% to 30%, according to The Journal said.

Martin's reported policy change concerns the cable industry, partly because it opens a new front in the government's efforts to impose indecency standards on cable and satellite provider, The Journal said.

Until now, the cable industry has resisted suggestions from Martin and some lawmakers to voluntarily offer a la carte choices or set up a "family-friendly tier" of channels suitable for children, the Journal said. By suggesting that consumers won't necessarily pay more for individual channels, the report calls into question the cable industry's revenue model, according to the story.

While the FCC can't force the cable industry to change its business model, its voice will add considerable weight to the debate and could embolden lawmakers eager to give consumers, particularly parents, more control over which television programming enters their homes.

Aside from the technical challenge of offering hundreds of channels on an individual basis, cable programmers and operators say such a switch would raise costs and reduce choices for consumers, the Journal reported. That's because, they say, pooling a group of channels into one cable package effectively lowers the cost of offering all of the channels.


Wouldn't a lot of channels go out of business though? Or at least greatly reduce their exposure?
 
Posted by Bottomliner on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Wangdo:
OP....Great analogy, just because it's there you don't have to use it. Frank has the extra shares just incase and if he doesn't use them by the alloted time the shares are no longer available.

Wangdo
I agree ... Optimus Prime did a great job explaining the A/S vs O/S debate. Good job, OP.
 
Posted by mjm2005 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by noah129:
good morning qbidians good luck today lets hope for a run soon as this volume is to me indicating someone knows something that i dont.

usually the smart money gets in and then a run comes along.im not sure if this is the case but im betting that we get an audit by the end of the week.just speculating but i think its coming and someone is stocking up bigtime. i hope i am right but qbid has been a frustrating stock for so long that it is likely to trade at these levels for a while.

best of luck to you all sincrely your qbidiot.

20 million long and strong.

Is anyone planning on getting out if there is a run?
 
Posted by cobracobra on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Bottomliner:
quote:
Originally posted by Wangdo:
OP....Great analogy, just because it's there you don't have to use it. Frank has the extra shares just incase and if he doesn't use them by the alloted time the shares are no longer available.

Wangdo
I agree ... Optimus Prime did a great job explaining the A/S vs O/S debate. Good job, OP.

It was a good analogy but it should also show that to the eyes of a loan company all of your available credit is held against you because if you wanted to use it it is possible to do so....
 
Posted by mjm2005 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by buckwheatbob:
Interesting article from Reuters this morning:

Welcome to the Reuters Before the Bell Newsmail.

Wall Street has confidence in confidence - consumer confidence, that is. Stock futures are pointing up as investors expect Conference Board data after the opening bell will show shoppers are more comfortable about spending their money in this holiday season than they were in October.

But plenty of other numbers are on the way. Economists expect new homes sales to show some deceleration in October, with orders for big-ticket items like refrigerators and cars on an upswing.

The dollar edged up against the yen and the euro in hopes that the data will cement expectations of rising U.S. interest rates. U.S. Treasuries are flat.

Oil prices are hovering around $57 a barrel after OPEC bent over backwards to assure consumers they would have enough fuel for the winter.

In other precious commodities, gold rose above $500 a troy ounce for the first time since the 1980s.

Cable viewers, take note. The Wall Street Journal says the FCC is poised to suggest that cable systems give customers the option of subscribing to individual channels rather than packages.

And insurer Cigna is expanding its online pricing data for consumers to include services provided by hospitals, doctors and other health care providers.

Until tomorrow,
Lisa Von Ahn
Newsmail Editor

If I were given the choice of which channels I would choose, and let's say I also am in the market for QTN, I would probably sub out some other channels (Telemundo?? CSPAN?? etc) and opt in for QTN... that would actually, in my opinion, greatly increase the demand for QTN...because anyone who has the excuse that their monthly bill is just where they want it, no longer can say that...because they can choose exactly what channels they want and what they don't want...
 
Posted by Jennifercd10 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Mark J T:
jenn You own that many shares (264M) You think this is a good stock i own some shares but not that much. Is it just your own feelings that is company will do good?

Mark…
Yes I do. You must consider many things especially when investing into a non-reporting Pink. Any non-reporting company gives very little guidance. Hopefully soon we will have an audit, which will make Q transparent. In the meantime, I suggest that you filter thru all the information and inputs by others and look for the real substance.

There are many posters with agendas who talk a lot but give little verifiable information. Do your own research. Look for the raw data. Take time to analyze the information. For instance, George Takei, its just an interview. But I believe it may be his first TV interview since his coming out. If so, this would give Q a lot of press. Also, if you read the L.A.Times article of Nov. 4th, he appears to be a bit of an activist and desires to get the word out. I would bet my last share that Q has been talking with him about his own show. If something like that occurs, it would be big both in and out of the community.

Other celebrities have been signed up by Q. Time Warner, Cox and Bright House have signed carriage agreements. People and companies of stature don’t sign agreements blindly. They have there own responsibilities and make sure they are dealing with a company that can deliver and would be worth their own investment.

Talk to people on this board that have been to the Burbank Studios, Palm Springs and the principles involved. I have done all that. Look at the PR’s in the past 2-3 months. Some call these “fluff”, to me they are solid bricks laid in the road Q is building. Any new road requires many bricks. Without them Q, or any company, would not make it.

Take pause and put yourself in Frank’s shoes. You have a company to build. You need these building block PR’s. You can’t spend your day plotting and scheming how you are going to take Jennifercd10’s money away. Your time is far more valuable. Frank has taken Q very far towards success. We shareholders might not like some of his decisions or his delayed self-imposed deadlines, but he will do what he has to build Q. Don’t forget he has 53% of the stock. If Q wins he wins VERY BIG and his coattails are long.
 
Posted by mjm2005 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by airdoo:
i'm not giving up but i decided to invest some of my available funds elswhere. so i won't be adding to my 2+ million qbid shares. i love GTE lately. i know it's not a penny or a micro but it's been treating me right lately. you guys should at least check it out.

6% gain so far today...
 
Posted by kaos on :
 
still curious....has anyone been able to buy at .0004.... [Confused]
 
Posted by airdoo on :
 
it was up much much more earlier. but i still like where it's going.
quote:
Originally posted by mjm2005:
quote:
Originally posted by airdoo:
i'm not giving up but i decided to invest some of my available funds elswhere. so i won't be adding to my 2+ million qbid shares. i love GTE lately. i know it's not a penny or a micro but it's been treating me right lately. you guys should at least check it out.

6% gain so far today...