posted
Its already a collectors item and it hasnt been released.
lol
Rod
quote:Originally posted by Doctoall: Any thoughts on the DVD, does anyone care anymore? What if we were to get it this coming week? I suppose unless it had the audit on it, the whole DVD would probably we useless.
-------------------- Dont buy or sell on my opinions, do your research. Make sure you know what you are buying before you buy.
This is a non reporting pink sheet with very high risk. From high risk comes high rewards. Dont invest more then you can afford to lose. Posts: 4801 | From: Prescott, ON, Canada | Registered: May 2004
| IP: Logged |
only one reason i can think of to follow a poster around. that is pathetic actually.
nice to see you Lil.
Rod
quote:Originally posted by Jelly: You're right Q, I should take it easy on Grandma, huh?
Ohhhh a little slip and slide Lil. Totally game!
-------------------- Dont buy or sell on my opinions, do your research. Make sure you know what you are buying before you buy.
This is a non reporting pink sheet with very high risk. From high risk comes high rewards. Dont invest more then you can afford to lose. Posts: 4801 | From: Prescott, ON, Canada | Registered: May 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
Posted by: RedFox7 In reply to: BigMoneyAtl who wrote msg# 195935 Date:12/9/2005 8:28:11 PM Post #of 196053
Is there any possibility that we are still a un-noticed,un-recognized,off-the-radar,un-seen stock that is floating around in pinky-land that has not gotten any attention from the investment community that primarily focuses on stocks like Dell, Microsoft,Cisco and Ford?? After all, we still are in pinky land. In an area where institutions dont even dwell. Yet, we are broadcasting on TWC and COX in San diego, New York and what appears to be Houston soon. Not to mention all the others. Some thing is wrong no doubt. But, there is a really freaky "disconnect" between what QTN is accomplishing and what the market is posting as "intrinsic worth". 12 million market cap for a Network that is broadcasting on some of the largest cable systems in the USA and showing strong signs of growing. "Freaky situation". -----------------------------------------------
Posted by: ltesprit In reply to: RedFox7 who wrote msg# 195940 Date:12/10/2005 9:35:57 AM Post #of 196053
A 'pink sheet' stock doesn't have to be inferior to an exchange-traded stock. Here's why:
Stocks and bonds are called 'securities'. They're called that because they are a piece of paper that represents ownership claim on assets. They are not the assets themselves. So you are trusting the stewards of those assets (ie, the company's Management) that they will manage those assets for you. Stocks and bonds have covenants in their SEC registrations that 'secure' your rights to those claims. So your pieces of paper (the physical stock certificate or bond note) are secured by the integrity, credibility and competency of Management. Hence the name 'security'.
A 'pink sheet' stock means you are missing some key elements of security: regular financial statements, voting control, and independent board, etc.
Since a 'pink sheet' stock is missing these elements of security, the stock is less secure, and so has less value to an investor. Because all else being equal, investors are not willing to pay as much for a stock whose claims are less secure.
Frank Olsen's poor corporate governance, ambiguous and misleading information releases, total voting control, secret diluting, and withholding of audits are huge compromises of our QBID stock or 'security'. Our shares represent a very tenuous claim on TMM, thanks to his poor corporate stewardship.
The shame is, it doesn't have to be this way. Olsen could provide audited statements, be honest and open in his PRs, not dilute investors with his 53%-ownership insanity, etc. If his corporate governance was mature and professional, we'd have only 20+ billion shares outstanding, market credibility, and a share price around a $.01 right now. Our QBID holdings would be worth far more and so would his.
That is what's so infuriating. Thanks to Olsen's foolishness, everyone loses, even him. He wants to hold the gun, but he's shooting everyone in the foot.
In summary, a 'pink sheet' stock only means we are non-filing. It doesn't mean the company needs to be run poorly, be diluting shareholders, not provide financials, etc. Olsen has killed the security, and hence the value, of the QBID stock with his poor corporate governance.
-------------------- "Life is a comedy for those who think and a tragedy for those who feel." - Horace Walpole Posts: 117 | From: Appalachia | Registered: Oct 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
Posted by: jcradio In reply to: None Date:12/10/2005 12:59:32 PM Post #of 196076
FTA 'Queer Channel' plans launch in 2006 Saturday, December 10 2005, 15:02 GMT -- by Neil Wilkes
A new gay entertainment channel is planning to launch towards the end of next year, Broadcast reports this week.
'The Queer Channel' - brainchild of ex-ITN creative director Colin Fallesen - intends to launch as a free-to-air station by October 27, 2006. Fallesen is already "in discussions" with Sky and VOD operator HomeChoice over carriage on their respective services.
Content will comprise roughly 60% acquisitions, mostly from US gay channels Q Television and Here TV. Movies sourced from gay and lesbian film festivals will also feature, while planned original content includes Positive Living, a show for people with HIV, and Culture Vulture, a series profiling gay artists.
Fallesen told the mag that he had assembled £12 million of the £20 million The Queer Channel needs to launch, adding that Q Television had "expressed interest" in taking a 50% stake in the venture.
The news comes just two months after a proposed gay channel called Faze TV scrapped its launch plans after failing to secure a carriage agreement with Sky.
-------------------- Sometimes the poorest man leaves his children the richest inheritance. Posts: 804 | From: Woodbridge, Va | Registered: Aug 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
MT, Rod, Doc, Whiz or somebody...am I to understand that as long as Frank continues his poor corporate governance, the pps ATM machine will virtually empty, therefore leaving him to resort only to private investors for continued funding?
Why wouldn't he want the highest dollar value in the pps?
Little help to clarify this please.
Posts: 1236 | From: The Bluegrass State | Registered: Sep 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
the pps doesn't matter to him. he is a 53% owner. if he sells he take s53% of the profit
that is why he doesn't care at this point.
how ever, looking at that deal up 2 posts about the new queer channel for October of this year, i have a sneaky suspicion that there is more good news to come out. there is more revenue, and potentially more ownership.
this could be global in no time.
this will be a big network worth more the BET ever thought of being.
this is some really good news
rod
-------------------- Dont buy or sell on my opinions, do your research. Make sure you know what you are buying before you buy.
This is a non reporting pink sheet with very high risk. From high risk comes high rewards. Dont invest more then you can afford to lose. Posts: 4801 | From: Prescott, ON, Canada | Registered: May 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
Dont get to excited people, Just remember the Pridevision idea. Whatever happened to it? Still in court? Or?
Posts: 1637 | Registered: Apr 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
Yes but if he was doing everything he should be doing to keep the pps at fair value, say possibly at .01, well then he would benefit much much more Rod....Head scratcher there.
Posts: 1236 | From: The Bluegrass State | Registered: Sep 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
yup still in court. that may still come through.
you are dealing with the Canadian court system.
they can drag thsi out for years
Rod
quote:Originally posted by Bigrod40: Dont get to excited people, Just remember the Pridevision idea. Whatever happened to it? Still in court? Or?
-------------------- Dont buy or sell on my opinions, do your research. Make sure you know what you are buying before you buy.
This is a non reporting pink sheet with very high risk. From high risk comes high rewards. Dont invest more then you can afford to lose. Posts: 4801 | From: Prescott, ON, Canada | Registered: May 2004
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Hammer: .0001 for Christmas? Plenty of time left to get there and on its way.
You know... it's funny... I remember a guy... real smart guy... predicting .0001 sometime back... weird name he had... something italian... real smart guy as I remember.
On a different note, I can't wait to see this audit... man this is gonna be hillarious.
-------------------- Spend Word For Word With Me And I Shall Make Your Wit Bankrupt. Posts: 1326 | From: Here | Registered: Oct 2005
| IP: Logged |
Thanks for all your hard work and achievements this past year. Great job. I wish all of you a Merry Christmas and another productive and prosperous New Year!
quote:Originally posted by QBID'n: The unfolding of Allstocks greatest Cinderella story at .0001
1...a buyback PR 2...the audit 3...an exchange and new CEO PR
Posts: 1236 | From: The Bluegrass State | Registered: Sep 2005
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Hammer: .0001 for Christmas? Plenty of time left to get there and on its way.
You know... it's funny... I remember a guy... real smart guy... predicting .0001 sometime back... weird name he had... something italian... real smart guy as I remember.
On a different note, I can't wait to see this audit... man this is gonna be hillarious.
----------------------------------------------- Ya, was it not Corleonetotherescue?
Posts: 10729 | From: oregon | Registered: Feb 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
mangerete le vostre parole un RDQ di giorno presto
quote:Originally posted by RiescoDiQui:
quote:Originally posted by Hammer: .0001 for Christmas? Plenty of time left to get there and on its way.
You know... it's funny... I remember a guy... real smart guy... predicting .0001 sometime back... weird name he had... something italian... real smart guy as I remember.
On a different note, I can't wait to see this audit... man this is gonna be hillarious.
Posts: 1236 | From: The Bluegrass State | Registered: Sep 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
So much for your signature RDQ...after all, you are italian right? lol
Posts: 1236 | From: The Bluegrass State | Registered: Sep 2005
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Hammer: .0001 for Christmas? Plenty of time left to get there and on its way.
You know... it's funny... I remember a guy... real smart guy... predicting .0001 sometime back... weird name he had... something italian... real smart guy as I remember.
On a different note, I can't wait to see this audit... man this is gonna be hillarious.
----------------------------------------------- Ya, was it not Corleonetotherescue?
I'll make you an offer you can't refuse.
-------------------- Spend Word For Word With Me And I Shall Make Your Wit Bankrupt. Posts: 1326 | From: Here | Registered: Oct 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
as of right now those that have been negative on qbid have been right. ill give that much.
frank has not done the longs right like he said he would. but i havent sold any shares yet so technically i havent lost a cent.
im not pumping this lets the cards fall where they may. i have seen micro penny stocks go up 1000% in a day this is still possible for qbid as well.
if a real buyback is completed and some transparency from the company qbid can skyrocket anytime. these are big things that have to happen but when the transfer agent is called and it is verified that qbid has reduced its float and the ceo has retired x amount of shares well then yes qbids stock will go up big time.
i continue to remain positive in the face of a falling pps cuz i beleive in this company fully. if i get scammed big time in the end with a reverse split or a bankrupcty or anything else well i will be pissed like anyone would. but in the mean time i will wait as patiently as i can and watch qtv expand at very very very nice pace.
this qbidiot is waiting patiently as long as it takes. i went into this thinking it would be a two to five year hold i am thinking it might still be that long. its a good thing im willing to wait.
22 million long and strong i havent ever sold a share hence i have never lost a penny on qbid. best of luck to you all. at this point i hope we do go down to .0001 cuz ill find a way to stock up and i hope franky will be doing the same.
-------------------- gotta know when to hold em and when to .......... Posts: 1525 | Registered: Mar 2005
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by noah129: this qbidiot is waiting patiently as long as it takes. i went into this thinking it would be a two to five year hold i am thinking it might still be that long. its a good thing im willing to wait.
Long means long. Posts: 1236 | From: The Bluegrass State | Registered: Sep 2005
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by QBID'n: mangerete le vostre parole un RDQ di giorno presto
quote:Originally posted by RiescoDiQui:
quote:Originally posted by Hammer: .0001 for Christmas? Plenty of time left to get there and on its way.
You know... it's funny... I remember a guy... real smart guy... predicting .0001 sometime back... weird name he had... something italian... real smart guy as I remember.
On a different note, I can't wait to see this audit... man this is gonna be hillarious.
State andando salarglieli per? LOL
Any way. Haven't really been paying much attention lately. I'm sorry you are all getting slammed by the PPS. I wish you all the best and hope it hitS the sky for all of you!
-------------------- Lil,
Dont LOSE more than you can afford to invest....LOL
I'm buying low and selling into the run... Posts: 8024 | From: Joisey....see attitude above | Registered: Jan 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
There has been some talk lately about the fact that Q might not care how low the pps is right now because they are building this to sell it.
If that is the case, they are saying they'll get billions for it (their words not mine). If that is the case, it would work out to a few cents a share which would make most if not all of us money.
Since they are doing nothing to raise the pps right now, perhaps it just doesn't bother them because they know what their ultimate objective really is... selling. Just some of my thoughts. Any comments?
Posts: 30 | From: Sacramento, CA | Registered: Oct 2005
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by realmoney2: There has been some talk lately about the fact that Q might not care how low the pps is right now because they are building this to sell it.
If that is the case, they are saying they'll get billions for it (their words not mine). If that is the case, it would work out to a few cents a share which would make most if not all of us money.
Since they are doing nothing to raise the pps right now, perhaps it just doesn't bother them because they know what their ultimate objective really is... selling. Just some of my thoughts. Any comments?
What has been so surprisingly strange to me, as a rookie, has been the recent outcry from not just the shorts but longs as well.
Yes Frank is building to sell. But surely to goodness that won't happen in the near future. It can't. It will take quite a bit of time for the sub base to build and become profitable. And we got a hell of a long way to go in getting more advertisers as well.
The new debt debt load of our recent aquisitions has certainly pushed way beyond previously speculated debt/income ratios. And I think a buyer would rather see more black then red. Wouldn't you?
So why fuss and fit. Why hide and not post. Why deal with this as if it was a short. I just don't get it.
Myself, I'm content. This is a long and bygod thats how I'm invested. And the way I see it, as being a long is....no news is good news.
Posts: 1236 | From: The Bluegrass State | Registered: Sep 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
realmoney2, knowing Frank is building Q to sell is the only thing that helps me sleep at night(LOL)!! The pps sucks and with all these great carrier prs and no movement makes me sick.
But listening to him talk about our assets and that other networks comparitive to QTN have sold for billions helps me relax.
I would be happy if we were bought for 2-6 billion!!
Heck I would be happy to break even at this point!!
Posts: 1176 | Registered: Dec 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
well i sold at .0004 and i think im going to buy in at .0015...nice
-------------------- It isn't so much that liberals are ignorant. It's just that they know so many things that aren't so. Posts: 6949 | Registered: Apr 2004
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by QBID'n: MT, Rod, Doc, Whiz or somebody...am I to understand that as long as Frank continues his poor corporate governance, the pps ATM machine will virtually empty, therefore leaving him to resort only to private investors for continued funding?
Why wouldn't he want the highest dollar value in the pps?
Little help to clarify this please.
It's like Penny says! Frank owns 53% & Fifty Three Percent of 100 million dollars is 53 million dollars regardless how many shares there are.
Besides, if he keeps selling shares & paying himself a salary he will have virtually sold the company piecemeal.
Frank will benefit either way. We won't! Our only chance is that Frank realizes he could make a mint & leave a legacy of his being a great social architect if he would court an individual financier to loan him 30 million to quietly buy as much of the float as possible. He will have this thing at .0001 very soon.
He & his backer could be sure that the remaining shares when they filed form 4s would go deep green! Frank could pay off Merv or whoever with crazy interest to boot & keep the float VERY low while having this company look like it was worth being bought. There's a few wrinkles in that line of thinking that would have to be dealt with such as buying 28 billion shares fast enough that he could get most of it done before filing a form 4. Because once people saw a buyback that massive underway the pps would skyrocket & I'm not talking about 3 cents!
Sadly, my belief is that the damage Frank has done can not be reversed & he did it knowingly without hurting day-traders which he claims to hate. Frank hurt the longs & might have hurt his beloved gay target audience if they too invested.
I'll say this again. What bothers me most is that there were bashers that would write negative bull $h!t stuff that was just unbelievable even to them. In the end they were closer to the truth than I ever was!
Will I buy more at .0001? I'm pretty sure I will! Frank's a carnival hawker & will send this up big time on real & imagined potential.
Yep! We will see another monster spike even with this sad state of affairs but it will not last for more than a couple months & I do not think QBID in its present form will ever see a penny again.
Like I said there is only one way to really repair that damage without hurting those that put faith in him the Summer of 2004. But that would entail Frank displaying integrity, a characteristic that thus far he has proven to me he does not have.
Sadly!
"All we ever had to do is launch!"
Posts: 4363 | From: waldorf,maryland,USA | Registered: Mar 2004
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by sidhartha: Posted by: RedFox7 In reply to: BigMoneyAtl who wrote msg# 195935 Date:12/9/2005 8:28:11 PM Post #of 196053
Is there any possibility that we are still a un-noticed,un-recognized,off-the-radar,un-seen stock that is floating around in pinky-land that has not gotten any attention from the investment community that primarily focuses on stocks like Dell, Microsoft,Cisco and Ford?? After all, we still are in pinky land. In an area where institutions dont even dwell. Yet, we are broadcasting on TWC and COX in San diego, New York and what appears to be Houston soon. Not to mention all the others. Some thing is wrong no doubt. But, there is a really freaky "disconnect" between what QTN is accomplishing and what the market is posting as "intrinsic worth". 12 million market cap for a Network that is broadcasting on some of the largest cable systems in the USA and showing strong signs of growing. "Freaky situation". -----------------------------------------------
Posted by: ltesprit In reply to: RedFox7 who wrote msg# 195940 Date:12/10/2005 9:35:57 AM Post #of 196053
A 'pink sheet' stock doesn't have to be inferior to an exchange-traded stock. Here's why:
Stocks and bonds are called 'securities'. They're called that because they are a piece of paper that represents ownership claim on assets. They are not the assets themselves. So you are trusting the stewards of those assets (ie, the company's Management) that they will manage those assets for you. Stocks and bonds have covenants in their SEC registrations that 'secure' your rights to those claims. So your pieces of paper (the physical stock certificate or bond note) are secured by the integrity, credibility and competency of Management. Hence the name 'security'.
A 'pink sheet' stock means you are missing some key elements of security: regular financial statements, voting control, and independent board, etc.
Since a 'pink sheet' stock is missing these elements of security, the stock is less secure, and so has less value to an investor. Because all else being equal, investors are not willing to pay as much for a stock whose claims are less secure.
Frank Olsen's poor corporate governance, ambiguous and misleading information releases, total voting control, secret diluting, and withholding of audits are huge compromises of our QBID stock or 'security'. Our shares represent a very tenuous claim on TMM, thanks to his poor corporate stewardship.
The shame is, it doesn't have to be this way. Olsen could provide audited statements, be honest and open in his PRs, not dilute investors with his 53%-ownership insanity, etc. If his corporate governance was mature and professional, we'd have only 20+ billion shares outstanding, market credibility, and a share price around a $.01 right now. Our QBID holdings would be worth far more and so would his.
That is what's so infuriating. Thanks to Olsen's foolishness, everyone loses, even him. He wants to hold the gun, but he's shooting everyone in the foot.
In summary, a 'pink sheet' stock only means we are non-filing. It doesn't mean the company needs to be run poorly, be diluting shareholders, not provide financials, etc. Olsen has killed the security, and hence the value, of the QBID stock with his poor corporate governance.
Posts: 4245 | From: SMALLVILLE USA | Registered: May 2004
| IP: Logged |
Topic Closed
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
Printer-friendly view of this topic
![[Big Grin]](biggrin.gif)
![[Wink]](wink.gif)
