posted
What do you expect bill. Willy still believes Acca, the one that said there was a citi buyout and after Citi had to put out a pr saying we have no dealings with cmkx, Acca said it was hacked and would have someone over there fired if citi did't take it off there site. roflmao
Of course, he said no hearing too. And has claimed a settlement every week since Sept 2004. But of course he is right this time, lol. I guess it takes one to believe one.
-------------------- Invest with your brain not with your heart. Posts: 4405 | From: Bristol, Tn, USA | Registered: Aug 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
NO ONE SHOULD MISS THIS TRHEAD. IT'S THE REAL THING, FROM ONE OF THE BEST RESEARCHERS I HAVE EVER WORKED WITH. MUCH WILL BE CLEAR TO LONG AND BASHER ALIKE AT THE CONCLUSION OF THIS POST. STAY TUNED, IT GETS BETTER.
PB 32 ... Topic: a little light on the situation
Posts: 2375 | Registered: Nov 2004
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by bill1352: rumors of a settlement???? is it a full moon??? seems as if every full moon or weekday ending in the letter "Y" brings a new rumor of a settlement.
I don't know if it's a full moon but is sure sounds like someone is mooning us
-------------------- Be Careful Of The Toes We Step On Today, They Could Be Attached To The Butt We Have To Kiss Tomorrow Posts: 4727 | From: Elk Grove ( Sacramento )CA USA | Registered: Jun 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
Okay Stockheads. I have a situation happening right now and I’m in great need of worthy advice from one’s more experienced than I. If you all have some time to ponder this.
I own shares of co A (CA from here out) . Over 4 years same name, same business, pps from .0002 to 2.25 over same time frame. Share volume constant. actually had cash dividends 3 years ago. Pps flattened out to sub penny 1 and ½ year ago, but gave 3- 25% stock dividends in recent time frame back 2 years. last 25% stock dividend was announced 7/29/05, (paid me 65000 shares on 8/15/05) along with a sec file of dropping present business And splitting into 2 new but distantly related ventures. company claimed regret for poor stock performance, gave 25% share div… and stated it would not do reverse split or other adverse actions to harm it’s shareholders. But advised it would have some actions to report upon completion of new company processes.
CA has no reverse split action in it’s history. Only thing I can find is late filing causing an ‘E’ after the symbol. Also must tell you, it’s a precious metal, mineral exploration co. which had property in Africa, but dumped out of Africa because of volatility. Okay… what do you all think is going to happen. A. Company does massive reverse split then changes name. B. Company rolls shares into new companies and shareholders don’t lose. C. Company declares all shares worthless ..(aka Kmart) and starts over. It’s quiet before the storm and there’s no info coming as yet. Thanks so much for any input here… Regards Stockster5
-------------------- Eagles may soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.... Posts: 400 | From: Jupiter, somewhere out there | Registered: Jun 2005
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by legaleagle: NO ONE SHOULD MISS THIS TRHEAD. IT'S THE REAL THING, FROM ONE OF THE BEST RESEARCHERS I HAVE EVER WORKED WITH. MUCH WILL BE CLEAR TO LONG AND BASHER ALIKE AT THE CONCLUSION OF THIS POST. STAY TUNED, IT GETS BETTER.
PB 32 ... Topic: a little light on the situation
Sorry, I'm not allowed to go there since somebody saw fit to have me ejected for naively suggesting UC might be a crook.
-------------------- If I give you bad information, please feel free to sue me. I have nothing left anyway. Ed Posts: 1772 | From: Oxford, PA, USA | Registered: Oct 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
Never mind....I will believe every word you say as soon as that $2,000,000 shows up in my account. Until then, I have a VERY large salt shaker.
-------------------- If I give you bad information, please feel free to sue me. I have nothing left anyway. Ed Posts: 1772 | From: Oxford, PA, USA | Registered: Oct 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
stockster if you have a profit sell & watch. you can always buy back in.
-------------------- "keep your stick on the ice & your cup firmly in place" Posts: 3651 | From: Algonac, MI. 48001 | Registered: Jun 2004
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by legaleagle: I can bring it all here if everyone would like, but it is long. And much more coming.
Hell, legal, most of that information is old and a lot of it I brought out in mentions of shady deals or connections of various cohorts. What is new may or may not be meaningful.
Noticed WWJDThruMe (Debi) is still slinging her usual mud.
Posts: 3607 | From: NJ - Outside Phila. | Registered: Mar 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
Wallace, that is only the beginning of the research. Remember, he said chapter one. This chapter is to get people up to speed on the players. Stay tuned.
I think you need to take the rest up with Debi.
Posts: 2375 | Registered: Nov 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
Actually, I'm more asking if anyone has seen this pattern. I had a company r/s on me, but the announcement was made late on a friday during a holiday weekend, how's that for guaranteeing nobody can unload. The new name came back and priced at .10 a share... out of my budget. And my reduced shares were worth 9.98. At the time before the announcent the pps had bottomed out as well. I realize this is nothing new unfortunitly. thanks. S5
-------------------- Eagles may soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.... Posts: 400 | From: Jupiter, somewhere out there | Registered: Jun 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
Wallace#1 ...maybe I'm going to check ebay tonight on that engine. lol
S5
-------------------- Eagles may soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.... Posts: 400 | From: Jupiter, somewhere out there | Registered: Jun 2005
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by stockster5: Wallace#1 ...maybe I'm going to check ebay tonight on that engine. lol
S5
stockster, they may not have your locomotive up for sale. Each carries a different value. All locomotive prices must include the tender. Also condition and orig.boxes are critical for top dollar.
Posts: 3607 | From: NJ - Outside Phila. | Registered: Mar 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
Word out is UC and Dhonau are in Hong Kong. Now I know some will say he is looking for a new home where he won't be extradited. However, I prefer to examine the possibility that if they did, then they have something to sell to the Chinese, and it ain't Kool Aid either.
Posts: 2375 | Registered: Nov 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
Hong Kong??? i'll put my money on something to sell...jade comes to mind. as in missing jade & or what ever the second gem purchase that can't be explained is.
-------------------- "keep your stick on the ice & your cup firmly in place" Posts: 3651 | From: Algonac, MI. 48001 | Registered: Jun 2004
| IP: Logged |
Joined: Aug 2005 Posts: 15 Re: a little light on the situation « Reply #154 on Today at 7:30pm »
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- A kernel of truth
For those of you that have read and commented on the DD we posted last night, thank you for all your thoughts both "negative" and "positive", all are welcome where we come from, and we hope that open communication in this forum will continue and indeed grow.
The reason for this post before we release anymore of our DD on here is to clarify our position collectively and try to put it into perspective for all of us to understand and hopefully appreciate.
First things first. Who is Columbo? In reality Columbo is a tight knit group of friends that initially all met through CMKX, be it on Paltalk ********s, RB, IHUB or Skype. We have as a group been doing deep DD for over a year now, and through all the disagreements and the moments of hope and happiness have stuck together as a team. Metaphorically speaking you are all part of Columbo, each shareholder in CMKX and its web of affiliations. We garner our information off of the internet, and from publicly available documents. Our goal when we started was to just find out some kernel of truth regarding the company we invested in. That said, we have found a lot of pieces, but not the whole truth, it is our belief that no one has found that to this point. Our search continues. We thank each and every person for all of the information they have posted, much of it is very interesting stuff to say the least and all a part of the path to the ultimate answers to all of our questions.
The next subject we want to touch on is that of affiliations. Many of the questions that were elicited from our post last night were legitimate questions, although some left us scratching our heads, most were good. One that we found particularly interesting was one requesting information on which "hedgy" we are a part of. The answer, NONE. Some of us don’t even know how a hedge fund works, let alone how you become a part of one, the answer is no we are not a hedge fund or anyone associated with one. We are not a part of or a party to any Brokerage Firm, Regulatory Body, Law Enforcement (past or present) nor are we part of any promotional or advertising body. We do not "pump" stocks, nor do we condone or support anyone that does. We do not personally know Pedro, George Burns, or any of the other publicly known figures. We have had some basic conversations with different individuals on the Internet or in the chat rooms, but we have no affiliations with anyone but ourselves. As for the Owners Group, some have suggested that Bill Frizzell and John Martin are behind us. That is absolutely untrue, we are our own voice, a collection of people from far and wide that only have one objective, to uncover some facts.
Further to any of the above people / entities, we are greatly interested in the information that has come out recently, it sheds a lot of light on different things we have been researching. We welcome that information flow, and feel we can contribute in an objective and sensible way. We have been asked specifically about the Owners Group and will answer the questions people have had with this statement. We support what the owners group is doing thus far, and the things they have posted on the Internet. The work they have done is something we have found to be valuable in our research. The power of everyone being united in one group certainly is an ideal that we share, and last night’s post was the beginning of our contribution to that end. Do we shareholders have the same feelings on every issue? NO we do not. No group ever does but we would support having open dialogue with everyone and keeping an open mind to everything that is going on and things that are said. Anything less is just being a "yes man" so to speak and we are not interested in thinking along any "party lines".
Next are Pedro and George Burns. One thing that we as a group recognise is the fact that different people appear to have spent their own money and time on a lot of DD and research oriented materials. The freedom of information act info from Pedro for one comes to mind. We as fellow shareholders appreciate the effort put forth to get that information shared with others. That said however do we all agree to everything that was said about that information? NO, but this information cannot and should not be overlooked. All of it needs to be read over and over and absorbed.
As we stated earlier Columbo is many of us. Many diverse opinions and interpretations, many questions some still unanswered. This is not a secretive cult, we will continue to post what we hope is relevant information, some will be, some may turn out not to be, but we hope that it is at least helpful to some of you in our quest for a kernel of truth. In closing we will also state absolutely none of us are affiliated with CMKX. We do not know any of the insiders, and we are not disseminating any information for them. We are not privy to inside information. We hope this clears up some of the questions that have been asked regarding "who you are".
posted
legal, i give you & all those involved credit for a lot of time, effort & work put into gathering all that info. that said you could have saved yourself a lot of work, time & effort. just looking at the ppl you found says there is a serious problem. i can't post but i was able to get in pb32, there is a thread about UC from 1999 when he was sued. it looks as if the suit wasn't won but a paragraph talked about UC & the guy involved with him. it states how both are known stock manipulaters. remember UC was pushed out of petro plus for putting out mostly untrue prs thus manipulating the pps. he left the company in trouble. in other words UC has been involved with questionable stock activities long before CMKX. add that to all the crooks he brought into CMKX, they didn't bring him into CMKX, & any reasonable thinking person would see that UC is the guilty party in all this with the help of a lot of other crooks both inside & outside the company. i would be suprised if UC did not have an off-shore bank account that can't be touched if even found. you say there is a lot more info coming & i don't question that but i'll bet you dollars to doughnuts its not good news for shareholders.
-------------------- "keep your stick on the ice & your cup firmly in place" Posts: 3651 | From: Algonac, MI. 48001 | Registered: Jun 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
But bill, you failed to mention the counter suit which debunked all of the allegations. This was a 1999 civil case and there was no disposition, obviously settled outside of court.
Unlike criminal cases, civil actions make every accusation they can think of against the defendant, then they attempt to prove one or two in court. However, this one never made it to trial and we will never know which side was telling the truth.
Allegations and proof are two different animals.
Posts: 2375 | Registered: Nov 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
Try not to get too excited, I know some of you won't, LOL but...............
Listen carefully to what this Forest Gate spokesman is saying about what is happening in the area of the Shore Kensington merged claims. I had to listen 3 times to make sure I was really understanding what he is saying. It's that important.
posted
notice he doesn't mention cmkx. he does say other have found kimberlite, in that area i'd say thats a given idea. everything says there are lots of kimberlite pipes in the area. good for forst gate & any company involved in the area. meaningless for CMKX. first the 025 Sask. properiy contract is probably voided. notice where forest gate holds claims, right between shore & debeers, the same area CMKX was supposed to have tied up. also note the o/s & float of forest gate...under 10 million float & 25 million o/s. i know the "M" might throw you off, the term is Millions which is a great deal less then Billions. the differance is in the number of zero's involved, in this case there are 4 less zero's. this lack of zero's add's value if something worth mining is found. but then this goes back to that 1st grade math, something the cult has real trouble understanding...lol
-------------------- "keep your stick on the ice & your cup firmly in place" Posts: 3651 | From: Algonac, MI. 48001 | Registered: Jun 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
I didn't think you would "really" listen, bill. Of course it doesn't name CMKX, so you prefer to believe that CMKX's massive surrounding land holdings were not what he was talking about.
Posts: 2375 | Registered: Nov 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
August 25, 2005 (FinancialWire) With JPMorgan Chase & Co. (NYSE: JPM), Deutsche Bank AG (NYSE: DB), Goldman Sachs Group Inc., Morgan Stanley (NYSE: WMD) and Merrill Lynch & Co. (NYSE: MER), who dominate the credit-derivatives market, reportedly among 14 banks being called on the carpet by the NY Fed over “unconfirmed trades,” and a super task force of regulators reportedly auditing the top brokerages over allegations of illegal naked short selling, it could soon be “SHO and tell” time.
Regulators are smarting over allegations that they gave super hedge funds a free pass because “fails to deliver” were just too massive to reconcile in the “grandfather clause” in Regulation SHO after the FTDs couldn’t be cleaned up even with a six months notice, and there is growing evidence that the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, the NASD and the New York Stock Exchange are not about to let some state regulator do another “Spitzer” on them.
The North American Securities Administrators Association, representing state regulators, was sharply critical of the Depository Trust and Clearing Corp., co-owned by the NYSE and NASDAQ, during the comment period over Regulation SHO, and FinancialWire has been aware for some time that some state regulators have been looking into why the DTCC has fails to deliver amounting to $6 billion a day.
NASDAQ may soon pull out of the DTCC and form its own clearing group, according to Traders Magazine. A break-up of the DTCC has been editorially endorsed by Investrend Information, publishers of FinancialWire.
A growing chorus has also risen from Congress to “make Regulation SHO effective,” rather than what critics say it has been so far, a showcase of illegal manipulation.
quote:Originally posted by aj4400: My L2's show a 25 Million buy @ .0007. Does anyone have any idea why?
aj, probably a fat fingered trade that left out a zero. Probably was intended to be quad 7 > .00007
AJ, maybe I will need to apologize on this. Usually fat fingers are cancelled, but those three .0007 trades are still showing this morning.
Posts: 2375 | Registered: Nov 2004
| IP: Logged |
NSS won't help CMKX or UC and cohorts in the least. Their legal problems are a different matter.
Posts: 3607 | From: NJ - Outside Phila. | Registered: Mar 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
Wallace you keep saying UC, but you really don't KNOW that do you? If you invited a neighbor into your house, and they steal your gun and kill someone with it, are you responsible for that death, or just guilty of trusting the wrong person?
If UC were suspect of the things you are alluding to, he wouldn't be traveling the world. He would have already been ordered not to leave the country.
Posts: 2375 | Registered: Nov 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
It's still all bull****. .0001 is .0001, no money being made.
-------------------- If I give you bad information, please feel free to sue me. I have nothing left anyway. Ed Posts: 1772 | From: Oxford, PA, USA | Registered: Oct 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
You know they had to get Al Capone for tax evasion. Its like saying you really don't know he is a mob boss. Everyone knew what he was, just getting the facts that would hold up in court is another thing. Legal if it smells bad then it usually is. And UC's books an dilution practice alone should tell you something. Let alone all the other facts that have came out.
-------------------- Invest with your brain not with your heart. Posts: 4405 | From: Bristol, Tn, USA | Registered: Aug 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
Ed, money being made by folks who bought at quad 4. And can you tell us why a company facing revocation is slowly moving UP?
Posts: 2375 | Registered: Nov 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
Because morons like Willy and Acca are telling koolaid drinkers that a settlement is going to happen in the next 2 weeks and they better be holding or buying share. This is exactly why the SEC is trying to get a summary order. I hope willy, acca, car, jay, and many others go to jail for there lies.
-------------------- Invest with your brain not with your heart. Posts: 4405 | From: Bristol, Tn, USA | Registered: Aug 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
Up where? Sorry, guy, I'm not one of the luckys ones who can buy and sell at less than .0001. All this drivel nets me zilch.
Stock play of a lifetime....yeah, right !!!
-------------------- If I give you bad information, please feel free to sue me. I have nothing left anyway. Ed Posts: 1772 | From: Oxford, PA, USA | Registered: Oct 2004
| IP: Logged |
Topic Closed
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
Printer-friendly view of this topic
![[Big Grin]](biggrin.gif)
