I did not know that your daughter had joined Allstocks... Good for her!
-------------------- I need a favor from you. The favor was to pick up fifty kilos of cocaine. Thats a hundred and ten pounds. Not exactly a small favor. Not like bumming a cigarette. I didn't have anything better to do that day. It's not like I was on parole or anything
IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by duediligence1: The village idiot is back.
When you can't prove the obvious wrong, then attack the messenger. All I ever see is you calling people names yet not one proof that what you believe in is true. Praise those that have the same belief and ridicule those that don't. But never bring anything of value to the conversation. Talk about comic relief.
I have to PROVE something to you?
No, I don't. I could careless about you. In fact, if I saw you dying of thirst in the desert I wouldn't even give you my piss.
Comic relief? If I wanted that I'd go talk to your spouse about your mating habits.
-------------------- I need a favor from you. The favor was to pick up fifty kilos of cocaine. Thats a hundred and ten pounds. Not exactly a small favor. Not like bumming a cigarette. I didn't have anything better to do that day. It's not like I was on parole or anything
IP: Logged |
(Melvin) Oooooooooohhhhhh (IBM) Is Melvin OK? (UC) Oh, yeah . . . just OD'd on STUFFIUM
Joined: Nov 2004 Gender: Male Posts: 533 Location: Carmel, CA "Our" claims . . . who really owns them « Thread Started on Today at 12:24pm »
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Since there have been several requests for a "claims" thread showing who owns what, here's the current info as best I can determine.
1. I searched the current Saskatchewan mineral claims database and found no entries for CMKM Diamonds.
2. The claims map on the CMKM Web site is not correct in that all the claims labeled "CMKM Diamonds" are actually held by numbered Saskatchewan partnerships which I'll detail in a moment.
3. All the "original" claims held by CMKM Diamonds as detailed in the DEF 14C of 2003 have lapsed and have been picked up by Saskatchewan limited partnerships (1.4 million acres), Nevada Minerals (325,000 acres) and United Carina (36,000 acres).
Unless there is other data, it looks to me like all the Saskatchewan claims that are purported to be CMKM claims are in fact held by six Saskatchewan limited partnerships. I have listed the partnerships by number along with their claims acreage and the principal stock holder of each parnership:
101012190 43,379 acres Moen, Allan 101023310 29,806 acres Cypress Geoservices 101024796 10,892 acres Kirkland, Ann 101047025 1,012,023 acres Koch, Emerson 101050803 153,882 acres Nevada Minerals 101053292 218,219 acres Sim, Robert
Nowhere in any of these partnership profiles I downloaded from the Saskatchewan government site was CMKM or Urban Casavant listed as a partner. I recognize the JV connection with Nevada Minerals, but Nevada Minerals only has claims for 154,000 acres, and those claims are not in CMKM's name despite the JV relationship.
As far as I can tell from current Saskatchewan government databases, CMKM holds no claims and the partnerships own claims for just over 1.4 million acres.
The big question is how (and if) these claims, which were once an asset of CMKM's and the primary reason I invested in late 2002, will ever find their way back into a position where they do we shareholders some good. Frankly, "faith in Urban" gives me no comfort at all . . . any other rationales would be interesting to hear. Got any?
Posts: 1489 Registered: 22-10-2004 Member Is Online
posted on 17-8-2005 at 04:17 PM
SHAWN HACKMAN AND HOW THIS PLAYS
Shawn Hackman an early player in CMKX and several associated companies. Read what he was doing and what he is doing for the DOJ now. Apply it to what you know about CMKX
JOHN L. SMITH: Fraud scheme case promises to set local legal community on its ear
Shawn Hackman didn't distinguish himself as an attorney in Las Vegas, but for a while he sure excelled as a criminal.
There's a lawyer joke in there somewhere, but the trouble in which Hackman finds himself is anything but humorous.
Hackman, 35, on Thursday pleaded guilty in U.S. District Court to one count of racketeering in a case that promises to turn Southern Nevada's legal community upside down: the 64-count indictment of lawyers linked to what authorities believe is the largest "boxed stock" fraud scheme in local history.
A conservative estimate of the profit from the sale of stock in more than 60 cardboard pump-and-dump companies is $35 million. Sources with knowledge of the setup say that number might represent less than 20 percent of the actual amount separated from investors who believed they were buying freely traded stock.
In exchange for his guilty plea, Hackman has agreed to cooperate fully against the remaining defendants: James Farrell of Sandy, Utah, and attorneys Sean Flanagan and Daniel Chapman of Las Vegas and Herbert Jacobi of New York. Their trial is set for June 15 in U.S. District Judge James Mahan's court.
Hackman, who faces up to 20 years in prison, is in line to receive a downward departure from the federal sentencing guidelines if he provides "substantial assistance," according to his plea agreement.
If Hackman's testimony holds up, it will bolster the government's paper-heavy prosecution against the remaining defendants. The case is being investigated by the Internal Revenue Service's Criminal Investigation unit and the FBI's Organized Crime Squad.
Hackman, after all, was in position to view the operation with his own eyes. And he admits he benefitted illegally from the scheme, which allegedly committed acts of "securities fraud, money laundering, wire fraud, mail fraud, interstate transportation of stolen securities and receipt and sale of stolen securities," according to the plea agreement, which was secured by Assistant U.S. Attorney J. Gregory Damm of the Organized Crime Strike Force.
As part of Hackman's deal, he also admitted he was hired by Las Vegan Peter Berney to "issue false and misleading legal opinions" associated with the fraudulent stocks. Hackman also participated in creating front men as corporate officers and helped set up mergers of the phony shell corporations with private companies.
As a result, he said, investors were led to believe they were purchasing shares in legitimate companies with names like Big Tex Enterprises Inc., Tera West Ventures Inc., Dream Team International Inc., Far East Ventures Inc. and Custom Leathers of Las Vegas Inc., among many.
After the shells merged with private companies, Berney, Las Vegan Robert Potter, and others would dump their shares and reap millions. Potter has subsequently pleaded guilty to money laundering conspiracy.
Although it's clear from the indictment and Hackman's plea agreement that Berney is the central figure in the investigation, his part of the case remains sealed. And for good reason.
This case is arguably the largest "boxed stock" fraud investigation in Southern Nevada history, but it's even bigger than that.
Take Jacobi, for instance. He pleaded guilty in October 2001 to plotting to obtain records stolen from the Las Vegas office of the FBI. Jacobi and Potter received the confidential documents from FBI employee James Hill, who later pleaded guilty. Jacobi paid former FBI agent Michael Levin for documents he believed to be authentic.
"It doesn't take much to figure out who's pulling that information from that computer," Jacobi told Levin.
Trouble for the lawyer was, the double-dealing Levin had already cut his own gig with the government and was wearing a wire.
As if that weren't compelling enough, Potter has been identified as part of a mob-connected pump-and-dump stock scheme in New York. One of Potter's alleged partners was an associate of the Genovese crime family.
It was into the middle of this insanely lucrative and dangerous high-wire world of stock fraud that Shawn Hackman found himself.
It's no wonder he wanted out.
John L. Smith's column appears Tuesday, Wednesday, Friday and Sunday. E-mail him at Smith@reviewjournal.com or call 383-0295.
"There is an appointed time for everything, and a time for every affair under the heavens" Ecc 3,1
IP: Logged |
posted
Cannot remember which but either the name Dhonahu, Williams or Casavant also rings a bell in connection with Hackman. I posted something about it ages ago.
IP: Logged |
posted
I called Ameritrade today to see about the restricted shares that Urban "gave us". The nice lady told me to call the company. I found a phone number for Andrew Hill (306-752-3755)and got his message machine, he is on vacation and does not want messages left! He didn't say when he would return. Why am I surprised! Also, I didn't realize the number was a Canadian number..so now I will be paying for an international call. What a rip-off! And Urban is still walking around as a free man!
IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Wallace#1: Cannot remember which but either the name Dhonahu, Williams or Casavant also rings a bell in connection with Hackman. I posted something about it ages ago.
Wallace, when Hackman was picked up by the DOJ he was involved in more that 20 Dhonau companies, most of whom were involved in some way with CMKX. Who might we think he turned states evidence on? Did Dhonau take a deal and let them in the most manipulated of his companies, CMKX? Did Urban agree to co-operate in order to take down John Edwards? Stayed tuned for tomorrows episode of how "The Worm Turns". The "Story" is beginning to break.
IP: Logged |
posted
Merger Between Shore Gold And Kensington Resources Consolidates Fort a la Corne Diamond Field.
Shrewd timing by Matthew O’Keefe of Canadian brokers Westwind Partners. On August 2nd he published his first write-up of the Saskatchewan diamond explorer Kensington Resources. One of his conclusions was that the best solution for the future of the Fort a la Corne kimberlite cluster might be for Kensington and Shore Gold, another explorer in the same mining camp, to merge. Yesterday the two companies announced that they did, indeed, intend to tie the knot. Not only that, but Robert McCallum, president and CEO of Kensington, confirmed that serious talks had only been going on for about a fortnight. Either Mr O’Keefe acted as a catalyst for the deal, or he was very well informed, or it was all a complete fluke. We will never know, but suggest he claims the first alternative.
The Fort a la Corne field is one of the largest diamond-bearing kimberlite clusters in the world. And the great advantage it holds over the Ekati and Diavik diamond mines and other projects in the Northwest Territories and Nunavut is that the 57,000 acre property is in Saskatchewan and is not only accessible all year round, but infrastructure is available and costs considerably lower. The Kensington joint venture contains 52 kimberlite pipes located within the main northwesterly trend and an additional 11 kimberlites in a satellite cluster some 20 kilometres to the east. The individual bodies are large, with surface expressions covering up to 250 hectares and lie beneath 85–100 metres of sand and glacial till. The partners have identified 20 primary kimberlite targets and detailed work on four of these has already shown economic potential with an estimated resource of 35 million carats.
Shore Gold, on the other hand, is focussed on the huge Star Kimberlite which adjoins the Kensington property and it is thought that up to 30 per cent of it may actually lie on Kensington’s side of the border. This came to light when Shore was carrying out its recent underground bulk sampling operation and it became clear that mining would be simplified if there was access from both sides. The resource on Shore Gold’s portion is estimated at over 240 million tonnes of kimberlite grading 15.7 carats/100 tonnes. An open pit operation involving the whole of the kimberlite could be of a size that would impact the world’s annual diamond production.
Talk such as this is very sobering for directors of junior companies which have not had an easy time in the past. Kensington is equal partners with De Beers at Fort a La Corne with 42.245 per cent each and the other companies involved are Cameco Corporation and UEM. The relationship in the past between Kensington and De Beers has been fraught, but it has settled down under the guidance of Robert McCallum who is an old De Beers hand. Even so the exploration programme has been of the slow and ponderous variety favoured by majors and Kensington has had to find the money to avoid being diluted. Only recently has this become easier as investors began to appreciate the potential of Saskatchewan diamonds. Shore Gold has a 100 per cent interest in Star and the decision to sink a shaft and carry out bulk sampling underground, rather than sticking to wide diameter drilling, garnered information that put it ahead of the Fort a la Corne partnership.
The other strength of Shore lies in its shareholders which include Benny Steinmetz and Newmont Mining . They don’t come much bigger than Newmont and Pierre Lassonde, its president, sees great potential in consolidating Star and accelerating exploration of the other kimberlites, so wants to maintain its 9.9 per cent holding in the enlarged company. Steinmetz controls the Steinmetz Diamond group which is one of the world’s largest integrated diamond marketing and trading companies with offices in Antwerp, Tel Aviv, Mumbai, Johannesburg, New York and Chicago. His interest is in the primary production of diamonds and it is this that may bring him head-to-head with De Beers which is another facet of this fascinating deal.
As Matthew O’Keefe points out, De Beers needs diamonds and this merger has effectively diluted its interest in the whole of the Fort a la Corne field. Recently, De Beers announced that it would be closing the Koffiefontein, Kimberley and Oaks mines in South Africa as they are no longer profitable. This cuts some 75,000 carats a year from De Beers’ production and though this will be made up eventually by three other Canadian operations – Snap Lake, Victor and Gahcho Kue – only Fort a la Corne could allow it to rebuild its resource base with a long term supply of high quality diamonds. This point will not have been lost on Steinmetz, nor on De Beers’ major rivals Rio Tinto and BHP Billiton. The merger between Shore and Kensington could therefore be just the start of a bigger game.
The new company is in a powerful position with a market capitalisation of over C$780 million which will give it international exposure and thus improved access to capital. Its board combines experienced directors from both companies under the chairmanship of Kensington’s James Rothwell, former president of BHP Diamonds. The lack of promotional skill among the five Shore directors will be contributed by Kensington and there is plenty now to work on. The new company will have around C$200 million in cash and no debt which means that the C$47.5 million slated for exploration by both parties this year will cause no pain. This looks like one of those deals where there is real synergy so investors will be watching to see how everyone works together and how De Beers fits in, or doesn’t.
IP: Logged |
posted
legal, weren't you a cop? everything say's UC is guilty of a scam yet you want to believe he isn't. even the claims are not in cmkx's name but then thats been true for quite a while. if you applied the same way of thinking your applying to UC they would have fired your butt before you quit being a rookie.
-------------------- "keep your stick on the ice & your cup firmly in place"
IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by bill1352: legal, weren't you a cop? everything say's UC is guilty of a scam yet you want to believe he isn't. even the claims are not in cmkx's name but then thats been true for quite a while. if you applied the same way of thinking your applying to UC they would have fired your butt before you quit being a rookie.
posted
Now, legal, your friend and supporter, JBCak, byrdturd, blueeyedtrader, psychedelictrader,etc. --called psycho -- is PMing me with a Subject of "How's the O2 tank?".
As in the past, I noticed you posted absolutely nothing about the offensiveness of his posts. Therefore, as far as I am concerned, you encourage his demented, filthy posts.
psycho,
I have no intention of reading your filth and will shortly delete it.
IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Wallace#1: Now, legal, your friend and supporter, JBCak, byrdturd, blueeyedtrader, psychedelictrader,etc. --called psycho -- is PMing me with a Subject of "How's the O2 tank?".
As in the past, I noticed you posted absolutely nothing about the offensiveness of his posts. Therefore, as far as I am concerned, you encourage his demented, filthy posts.
psycho,
I have no intention of reading your filth and will shortly delete it.
Wallace I have never supported that kind of bs against you, any more than you support osnap and his twisted little mind.
It's just something you "accumulate" when you take a position. One way or the other.
IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by bill1352: legal, weren't you a cop? everything say's UC is guilty of a scam yet you want to believe he isn't. even the claims are not in cmkx's name but then thats been true for quite a while. if you applied the same way of thinking your applying to UC they would have fired your butt before you quit being a rookie.
posted
FRIZZELL LAW FIRM 305 S. Broadway, Suite 302 Tyler, Texas 75702 (903)595-1921 E-Mail jmartin@cmkxownersgroup.com
Greetings Members,
I would like to take the time in this update to discuss several items with you.
Appeal Process: Many of you have read the company's response to the SEC's Motion For Affirmance. I have received nothing from the Commission which suggests the Motion For Affirmance will be granted. As it stands right now, a brief from the company will be filed on or before September 6. The SEC will most likely file their response by October 6. The company will have until October 20 to reply to the SEC's brief. Mr. Stoecklein and I spoke yesterday about the brief and we have agreed to collaborate in the preparation. He has already begun the briefing. I will probably be asked to offer input after the first draft is completed. Mr. Stoecklein is a competent attorney and I expect the brief to adequately cover things from the shareholders' perspective. The wording in the order makes it apparent the Commission does not desire a brief from me or any other party. In order to file a brief on behalf of the shareholders, I would need to obtain permission from the Court before doing so. I do not plan to do that.
Litigation: Thanks to some incredible work from some of your dedicated shareholders, I have been able to keep abreast of many lawsuits that have been filed in the last few months against parties that are involved with CMKX and your investment. It appears to me that there are individuals and companies who have been the victims of some unscrupulous stock deals and they have hired lawyers to file suits to obtain redress. I am becoming convinced that litigation may be necessary on your behalf against some third parties to allow me to obtain all the facts necessary to help this group. As you may know by now a certain individual opened numerous trading accounts in 2003 and 2004 at a well known Nevada broker/dealer to facilitate the sale of hundreds of billions of shares of CMKX stock. Short selling no doubt occurred once it became known in the market that nearly 800 billion shares of CMKX had hit the streets. A lawsuit against certain parties would greatly assist us in obtaining the facts necessary to identify all parties involved in any trading improprieties and will allow us to accurately identify the short sellers. If I decide to bring any lawsuit, I will obtain permission from the shareholder that will be the named plaintiff or plaintiffs in the lawsuit. Any suit will not be brought on behalf of the CMKX Owners Group. There will be no individual shareholders named other than the individuals I select to bring any claims. If I brought a lawsuit on behalf of the CMKX Owners Group, I might be required to spend the next couple of years attending the depositions of 6,000 or 7,000 shareholders or responding in discovery to requests for documents from all of the 6,000 or 7,000 shareholders. This would of course be a waste of the shareholders time and mine. There is concern that a lawsuit by a small number of people would allow u! s to obt ain some huge financial settlement for only those named in the lawsuit. Damages will clearly be sought against those that may be sued. The damages sought will relate to the losses incurred by the named plaintiffs. If a lawsuit went extremely well and certain defendants wished to offer any serious sums of money for settlement, it would be simple to ask the Court's permission to assist us in some way to apportion any recovery amongst the shareholders. I am not a class action lawyer and do not plan on bringing a class action lawsuit. If a class action of some type is in order, I will cooperate with such lawyers for the benefit of all shareholders, but that is not my desire nor my purpose in this potential litigation. Any lawsuit, deposition, subpoena or discovery that I might bring will benefit all of the shareholders if it benefits any one shareholder. I have been litigating cases for 27 years and I know the task I am undertaking if I choose to bring litigation. I will only do it if I am convinced I have no other avenue of obtaining the information I am seeking and there is no other way to get redress for the shareholders. This will not be a suit against the company nor Urban Casavant at this point in the proceedings. John tells me there are those that suggest a lawsuit would yield tons of money for only those that I choose to name as a plaintiff so what good would it do for the shareholders. Remarks like that are very unsettling to me. I have become very thick skinned to some of the remarks I receive from a select few. I do not respond to those that choose to make personal assaults on my integrity or my courses of action. I know that my efforts are helping the shareholders and I plan to continue to do so.
Private Party in Tyler--Last week we were honored here in Tyler to have Hugo Cancio and a production crew come to my office for filming segments of Hugo's documentary on the saga of CMKX. Hugo felt it important that he document all sides of the CMKX story including the plight of the shareholders. He has been to Ecuador, Canada and Las Vegas with Urban and other insiders in the company. He is producing a story that needs to be told. Knowing that Hugo would be in town, I suggested that John invite some of the shareholders from this area to drop by while Hugo was here. Some were interviewed for the documentary. Some of your well respected shareholders came here from Northeast Texas and East Texas to meet Hugo and have a little fellowship. John invited us to his home after a long day of videoing around the office. The fine lady shareholder that allowed me to stay in her home when I went to Washington last month was able to arrange her travels to spend a night in East Texas. I took the opportunity to share a select few documents that we had obtained as a result of months of due diligence by this office and many dedicated shareholders. You have some shareholders out there that spend endless hours researching and investigating various aspects of this case. Their hard work is paying off. I would not dare name them because it would embarrass them and they are not doing this work in order to draw attention to themselves. Please know that I (and all the other shareholders) will forever be indebted to you. Kudos to all of you that are helping to shed light on the problems facing this company. Much talk has occurred since this meeting about my choice to show only certain information and only to certain individuals. I scanned in a handful of documents and did a brief video presentation of some of the documents. I did not hand out any copies of the information. I did not pass out pencil and paper. ! ; It was a short show and tell. Some of the information was disturbing because it was the first time some people had seen an explanation of how these shares hit the market in such a short period of time. I have posted on the owners group site www.cmkxownersgroup.com a copy of a ledger sheet with some handwritten notes that was prepared by someone for Neil Levine as he was working on the audit before the administrative law hearing. We have entitled this document the "Share Distribution Breakdown". This was obtained by me as an item of discovery that went to all parties during the preliminary phases of the administrative proceeding. This is not the "smoking gun" that solves all riddles of the CMKX story but it is very helpful in explaining some things that bothered me (and I assume most shareholders) for a long time. How in the world can a company get nearly 800 billion shares into the market place in such a short period of time? Sometimes documents like this create more questions than answers. Believe me, we are working on answers to the questions that come from documents such as this. The facts surrounding the stock distributions will all come out when the company files it financials. Combine this document with the shareholder information which Pedro has provided you and you can start to piece this thing together. I have obtained mountains of information and more comes to my office on a daily basis. My practice is dedicated to this case alone. Those of you that suggest I am hiding information for some sinister self serving purpose should give more thought to that idea. I am simply bound by laws regarding confidentiality and common sense in the release of most of this information. Many shareholders have been to this office and you are all invited to see what goes on around here on a daily basis. You are! all wel come. We are all in this together.
Communication--Several people have asked about the level of communication between my office and the company. We are not having problems getting each other on the phone. I talked with Don Stoecklein yesterday. He called me while Urban, Ed Dhonau and Anthony Demint were in his office. We discussed the brief and suggestions were made to leave from Vegas to go to Ecuador after the Labor Day weekend. I expressed my desire to meet and discuss the plan for the shareholders and the present state of the claims and various businesses that make up CMKX. It is the company's position that it would violate SEC rules to selectively disclose information about assets and significant activities to certain shareholders (our owners group) without disclosing information to all shareholders. We agreed that such disclosure could occur if I would agree to make my updates following or simultaneously with an 8k. I am hopeful this will facilitate better and regular information from the company. Sorry, but I have no dates to give you on when this might start occurring. I have stated that we have no problem with such arrangement.
Rumor Busting--I hate to be one to burst some hopeful bubbles, because I know the anxiety many of you experience when a rumor begins to fly. I have not been involved in any discussions about settlements with any parties. Neither the company nor any third party has seen fit to call me with any discussions of settlements or even facts that suggest a settlement is in the works. If there is talk betweent he company and any third parties, I am not privy to such talks and have not been told of any. I cannot tell you for a fact that there are no discussions of settlement. I can simply tell you that I have not been involved in any discussions with anyone about settlements. John Martin has likewise not been contacted about settlements being offered by anyone. It will be one cool update when I can relate the substance of any such discussions with you.
Evaluation--I can tell you that I am comfortable in saying the claims represented by the company are being maintained. I make this statement based on reports from third parties that should be "in the know". John and I decided several months ago to make it a part of our investigation to determine as best as we could the existence and value of the claims which we have been told belong to the company. We have paid people on the ground in Canada to give us information about the claims. We do not have a figure for the $value of the claims in Canada, but I am convinced there is substantial value for many reasons. Our investigation reveals there has been a drilling program that continues as we speak. We hope to get more information for you as to the results of the drilling. The last PR about the drilling results probably did more harm than good. I believe we can get better information to you. I have told Mr. Stoecklein that I have some acquaintances of mine in the Oil business that are researching the area and there may be interest the oil concessions on our claims. It will take a another couple of weeks but I plan to continue my efforts in this regard.
Phase II--Some questions have been asked about the status of my work as Phase II or Phase I. The original (Phase I if you will) employment agreement clearly states that my agreement to represent the owners group concluded with a decision by the Administrative Law Judge. This decision was handed down on July 12. John suggested a Phase II because the work we had begun in addition to the administrative hearing representation was far short of being complete. We began receiving contributions and Phase II agreements before the Judge's decision came down. Many of you have not only contributed to Phase II, some have added contributions above the requested $25. Your funds make it possible to continue the work we have begun. I am thankful for your contributions of course. But I am equally thankful to you for the words of support and encouragement that sometimes comes along with your signups. It gets discouraging when hard work gets mocked and ridiculed by certain people. There are a select few out there that seem to delight in being critical, sarcastic and demeaning to our efforts. If I am forced (and it appears I will be) to begin litigation, Phase II will be expensive and could take quite a long time to resolve. If I did not believe it would be helpful to the overall cause of this representation, I would not consider it. I am starting to believe it will be mandatory. John and I have agreed not to do separate updates to Phase I and Phase II members. I hope we do not have to revisit this decision. I have been honored to represent the shareholders as a group. I feel honored to work for the individuals I have met personally as a result of this representation . I wish there were a way to meet all of the group members. This group if it stays together will be a force to be reckoned with. The bad guys would love to see a fractured broken shareholders' group. After all, isn't! that ho w most shareholders do when their investment goes sour? They just run away, bad mouth the promoters and write off their investment losses. A strong shareholders' group can make a difference. We can have disagreements and work them out like mature intelligent people, but we must stick together.
Naked Shorts--In my opinion we have proved the largest naked short in the history of the market. Will these illegal acts benefit the shareholders? There are many factors that must come into play, but I am very encouraged. Management has not "run off". The real assets of the company appear to be in place. It will only take a few deals to get done before these huge short position will be at the mercy of the marketplace. I look forward to that scramble.
Caveat--I do not advise any one to buy or sell stock based on the information contained in this update. You are advised that an administrative judge has ordered a deregistration of the securities of this company because the company has failed to file financial reports required by the SEC. There are serious complications to trading your stock if the de-registration order becomes final. Seek competent advice from a competent investment advisor before deciding to purchase CMKX stock.
FRISCO TRADER: Now on to the good stuff-apparently Neil is connected to John Edwards, who was connected to CROWN, the former MM who was nekked on CMKX. As you will recall, he was mentioned during the hearing....he's suddenly very wealthy and perhaps profitted from massive shorting of CMKX that he received, sold back to CROWN to cover their NSS position
IP: Logged |
posted
isnt edwards & angell the group roger glenn is from??? notice #6 is directed to them...330 billion shares are listed for #6. also notice in the update frizzy doesn't think pedro's master list is irrelevant as some in the cult thinks...including you legal as you have posted a few times
" Combine this document with the shareholder information which Pedro has provided you and you can start to piece this thing together."
-------------------- "keep your stick on the ice & your cup firmly in place"
IP: Logged |
If I am correct, that does refer to CMKX stock having been issued for dividends. Was a CMKX stock dividend ever declared? Did all shareholders get said dividend? I do not remember that it was declared. If not, what were those so-called dividends and to whom were they given?
PS: There were a number of issuances under the heading Dividends Issued and an Opinion of Counsel given. It appears that all those shares may have been issued as dividends. Public shareholders got none?
Adding all those figures up, it comes to over 731 billion shares, which makes no sense. PS: I think I might have added incorrectly.
posted
still the main point frizzy is leaving out is that every single share had to have UC's approval. it doesn't matter where the shares went they came from UC's hand. if those shares ended up making shorting possible it was because UC approved & issued them in the first place. to get into the o/s the t/a had to issue them. as UC was the board & only the board can issue shares into the o/s UC had to give the t/a the go ahead.
-------------------- "keep your stick on the ice & your cup firmly in place"
IP: Logged |
posted
" I talked with Don Stoecklein yesterday. He called me while Urban, Ed Dhonau and Anthony Demint were in his office."
still in tight with good old Ed...a guy named in 2 lawsuits for fraud & cheating ppl out of royalties. everyone around UC is caught cheating ppl out of money but UC is clean...ya right. oh ya i forgot...UC is the goverments inside man for a sting operation to clean up the stock market.
-------------------- "keep your stick on the ice & your cup firmly in place"
IP: Logged |
posted
Just doing a rough addition on a different calculator the figure above comes to a bit above 331 billion shares....alarmingly close to the increase in the authorized to 800 billion.
IP: Logged |
posted
Also, it appears all those shares under Dividends carried an Opinion of Counsel as to validity from Edwards & Angel which would be Roger Glenn's opinion. Those just for August 19th total a bit above 300 billion.
IP: Logged |
posted
if i remember correctly there were close to 700 billion issued before the increase to 800 billion according to that master list...glenns opinion may have been the a/s needs to be higher then the o/s...lol
-------------------- "keep your stick on the ice & your cup firmly in place"
IP: Logged |
I thought he or his firm got 300 million, not billion. Could be wrong though. Obvious question is why are those issuances identified as dividends and, if correct in the entry, dividends to whom and for what?
IP: Logged |
posted
"In my opinion we have proved the largest naked short in the history of the market."
Proof is absolute, not an opinion, you either have it or you don't have it. I have not seen any proof.
"We have paid people on the ground in Canada to give us information about the claims. We do not have a figure for the $value of the claims in Canada, but I am convinced there is substantial value for many reasons."
Yet no one can any claims registered to CMKX??? That's seems strange, but he is "convinced".
"Our investigation reveals there has been a drilling program that continues as we speak. We hope to get more information for you as to the results of the drilling. The last PR about the drilling results probably did more harm than good."
I expect either no more PR's regarding a drilling program or more of the "more harm than good" type.
-------------------- A million seconds is 13 days. A billion seconds is 31 years.
IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Wallace#1: L: "Stayed tuned for tomorrows episode of how "The Worm Turns". The "Story" is beginning to break."
W: You seem to forget that it was Urban Casavant who authorized all those shares that immediately ended up on the public market.
What was the buy back about awhile back?I've read somewhere that the a/s WAS going to be around 900 or something like that, if I recall correctly , with a line marked thru it reducing to 800.Why bother with a buy back when it's 800? Either you got 'em where you want 'em, or your really tring to get the a/s down without a rs.I mean he could have done it ten times by now.Hope he doesn't, but I guess he could of, if he was tring to do dulition damage why not go all the way.Whats a 100 billion anyway?LOL Hell, I don't know, I've just never seen anything like it.lol...
BUT, I do know .......... SAMMY HAGAR ROCKS!!! www. redrocker .com LOL!!! WWWWWWWOOOOOOOOOO!
Those so-called dividend shares would not be those to E&A or Glenn. They could not be designated as Dividends in that case. E&A is mentioned with reference to the Opinion of Counsel...which normally states the shares are legally issued shares and valid shares.
IP: Logged |
posted
According to VNGNTN there were some dividends or forward splits paid to shareholders in the "old days", as he was the recipient of them.
IP: Logged |
Topic Closed
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
Printer-friendly view of this topic
![[Big Grin]](biggrin.gif)
![[Wink]](wink.gif)
