posted
And Frizzell gave you a hint that he was intending to sue the person responsible. I have been giving you the name for days now. Edwards.
Posts: 2375 | Registered: Nov 2004
| IP: Logged |
The date of the issuance of those shares was 8/19/2004, if I am not mistaken. Therefore, the Opinion of Counsel would have been that same date, or should have been. Do you remember when the authorized was increased from 500 bil to 800 bil?
Posts: 3607 | From: NJ - Outside Phila. | Registered: Mar 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
Frizzell's comments about Pedro's posts and the info he has giving you the picture, refer to the Master Shareholder list distribution, tied to the list he put out tonight. You can see who was getting the shares. And I didn't say that all of Pedro's documents were faulty, I said that we have found errors on it and proven them.
Posts: 2375 | Registered: Nov 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
As far as Dhonau goes, I think the suits are being brought by the people who got "stung" by the sting. They are not "happy campers" right now.
Posts: 2375 | Registered: Nov 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
there was a divy split 2 yrs ago but the a/s was 100 billion back then. as for E&A's opinion...ric & i both counted the shares from the master list & it was around 700 billion when the a/s was 500 billion. i'd say that backs up a lawyers opinion that the a/s be increased to cover shares already issued. it was also over 100 billion when the a/s was increased to 500 billion. i could be wrong but i did do a quick add of shares & according to a/s increase dates the o/s was over the a/s twice.
-------------------- "keep your stick on the ice & your cup firmly in place" Posts: 3651 | From: Algonac, MI. 48001 | Registered: Jun 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
legal...you were bragging about aztec joining the cmkx family now they were stung by Ed??? second Ed is being sued by a holder of 14% of the diamond claims in brazil. he is sueing because 1) they never paid royalties to him on diamonds they illegally mined & 2) because they failed to keep the mining legal by filing the correct papers with the brazilian gov. then working it to illegally mine & then smuggle the diamonds to europe to sell. you think this guy was wronging someone???
-------------------- "keep your stick on the ice & your cup firmly in place" Posts: 3651 | From: Algonac, MI. 48001 | Registered: Jun 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
Aztec is a special case. Since I know Scott Tobia, I cannot comment at this moment. When the papers are filed, he has promised me a meeting to discuss it. Currently he is vacationing in Hawaii and like so many other CMKX related people will be incommunicado for awhile.
As to South America, the plaintiff seems to know an awful lot of first hand information about smuggling and other illegal stuff, doesn't he?
Posts: 2375 | Registered: Nov 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
So have I made my millions yet? lol. Still holding a million shares of this garbage. This was a joke. I have a friend that made a killing on the run to 0.0012 last year, and I bought in when it was falling. Oh well, it's a loss of $700. No point selling it since I'll only get $20.
-------------------- Kevin
Are you addicted when Allstocks.com is your homepage? Posts: 48 | From: Athabasca, AB, Canada | Registered: Jul 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
well lets see legal...the guy hold 14% of the claims, just about what cmkx holds on some of those claim in canada after selling part to USCA & SGGM. owning that much of something gives you insider status. he was given all momo's to a point from Diagmon, GEMM, USCA & Nevada Minerals. he objected when they wanted to bribe officals for permits. he saw the permits cancelled when the controling company failed to file the required reports. he found out after the fact that mining had happened from arrests made & the mine being shut down. 14% is not a controling interest so he had no real say in what happened....but you want to say this guy was the wrong doer? maybe he went down there & was mining? yet there is much more evidence UC scammed shareholders but you want to believe he is clean. of course Aztec is a special case, just a misunderstanding. its a company you want cmkx attached to.
legal sometimes i think your either lying through your teeth about what you believe or have gone completely brain dead concerning cmkx.
-------------------- "keep your stick on the ice & your cup firmly in place" Posts: 3651 | From: Algonac, MI. 48001 | Registered: Jun 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
bill: "there was a divy split 2 yrs ago but the a/s was 100 billion back then. as for E&A's opinion...ric & i both counted the shares from the master list & it was around 700 billion when the a/s was 500 billion." -------------------- bill, that does not explain why they are listed as dividends in Aug of 2004.
Posts: 3607 | From: NJ - Outside Phila. | Registered: Mar 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
Bill, the guy doesn't hold 14% he holds 6.78% in a royalty agreement, the legitimacy of which, has been questioned by the company. Read the Memo. Others own the rest of the 14%, and please note that they apparently didn't want to join in this suit.
Issod also admits that he knew about the bribery plot back in '01 or '02 yet did nothing about it until now. Should tell you a little about how upright this citizen is. If that doesn't tell you check on his Nev Corp - Diasource Management Services Inc. which bounced a registration check on the Nev SOS.
Next, I'm not going to try and defend Dhonau he has been involved in too many shady deals for that. However, it looks like the lawsuit puts most of the blame on Diagem and indicates that Dhonau's Nevada Minerals wasn't even a part of the action since they only came on board this year. They are named, simply because they became part of the operation recently.
If you can point out anything that Dhonau personally did that was illedgal, from the suit, please do. The suit is specific in stating that Brazil and Interpol have already made arrests in conjunction wiht the operation, yet none of the principals have been arrested.
And remember, you are looking at only one side of the lawsuit. Wouldn't it be prudent to hear the other side of the story before you jump to conclusions.
And as to Aztec, I didn't say there was any misunderstanding, they know exactly what they are doing. I said I wouldn't discuss it until I talk to Scott after the filing of the suit.
Posts: 2375 | Registered: Nov 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
legal, i will agree that diagem looks to be the main wrong doer in this. but putting anything against the guy sueing them is ridiculous. he did express his troubles about bribing officals. bouncing a check does not make the guy a criminal....lol if that was the line to cross UC would be in jail for life with his chit. & yes Ed got in late but USCA & GEMM were in it a while ago. it is also true that when sueing you name everyone poissible then weed out those that dont belong later. what i find very hypocritical is that for 2 yrs every company that knows somebody or has every worked for a company that knows someone at CMKX, GEMM, USCA or any of the canadian partners means that company must be part of the CMKX family yet USCA, GEMM & Nevada Minerals, 3 company that for sure have strong ties to CMKX are involved with an illegal mining operation but they may not be involved. to add a companies assets to cmkx all it takes is a phone call but anything illegal just can't be true.
-------------------- "keep your stick on the ice & your cup firmly in place" Posts: 3651 | From: Algonac, MI. 48001 | Registered: Jun 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
Have criminal dealings been going on in CMKX and related companies? Yes, I'll give you that. The question is "WHO?". And who were they working for. Principals in a sting frequently, if not always, have to be involved in some wrong doing to help the authorities catch the bad guys. We won't know what it was all about until the indictments are unsealed. I just think we are getting close to that moment, and Frizzell is pushing them as hard as he can to get this thing moving. And Frizzell is sitting there with 7,000 evidentiary documents from the govt. So I will have to trust his judgement and insight.
Posts: 2375 | Registered: Nov 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
all hail UC, the savior of the penny market....good grief charlie brown. the idea of dreaming for the future is to be realistic legal. i can dream of a 3 way with 2 great looking gals but if i start dreaming supermodels i'm nuts, its not realistic. UC may be turning evidence on someone but he had to be in it from the start. CMKX was not set up just to sting a group of ppl. UC started everything right after he took over by stopping filing. UC gave shares away to every family member, if it was a sting he would not have involved them
-------------------- "keep your stick on the ice & your cup firmly in place" Posts: 3651 | From: Algonac, MI. 48001 | Registered: Jun 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
Now psycho (aka JBCak,byrdturd,blueeyedtrader,psychedelictrader,etc.) has come on again as "Wallarse_1". Must have been banned as "psycho".
Posts: 3607 | From: NJ - Outside Phila. | Registered: Mar 2004
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by glassman: leagalale, it will be interesting to see if the internet pumpers get caught up in the justice net.....
Ya know glass, it's nice of you to warn me. You know just for my own good and all. We go back a long way on this thread, and I really doubt that you can find a post where I recommended CMKX to anyone. I bring information and opinion here. Mine and others, for people to read and make up their own minds. If I am "guilty" of anything, it is believing in this stock and attempting to answer the bashers here and show everyone that there may be another side to this story that they haven't heard, or even thought of,yet.
Posts: 2375 | Registered: Nov 2004
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Wallace#1: Now psycho (aka JBCak,byrdturd,blueeyedtrader,psychedelictrader,etc.) has come on again as "Wallarse_1". Must have been banned as "psycho".
That was my first thought Wallace. Now I wonder if osnapd has been banned and will come back as "legalbeagle".
Posts: 2375 | Registered: Nov 2004
| IP: Logged |
-------------------- If I give you bad information, please feel free to sue me. I have nothing left anyway. Ed Posts: 1772 | From: Oxford, PA, USA | Registered: Oct 2004
| IP: Logged |
Crown Financial Group, Inc. Announces Cessation of Market Making Activities
JERSEY CITY, N.J., Feb. 22 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- Crown Financial Holdings, Inc., (the "Company," Pink Sheets: CFGI.PK) today announced that Crown Financial Group, Inc. ("Crown"), the broker dealer subsidiary of the Company, has ceased market making activities while the Company continues to seek financing from a strategic investor or investors.
While Crown regrets inconveniencing its customers in this manner, the goal has been to do so in as an orderly manner as possible. To that end, Crown had previously voluntarily contracted its trading activities and had requested their valued customers to cancel all open orders and cease routing order flow to Crown.
While Crown hopes to resume market making activities in the near future, regrettably, there is no assurance that we will be successful in achieving our objective. Crown and its employees would like to express our heartfelt thanks to our trading partners for the business you have entrusted in Crown.
Questions regarding this press release should be forwarded to Mr. Robert Thornton at (800) 888-8118 x246 or Mr. Phillip Frank at (800) 888-8118 x386.
Certain statements contained herein constitute "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements are based on current expectations, estimates and projections about the Company's industry, management's beliefs and certain assumptions made by management. Readers are cautioned that any such forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult to predict. Because such statements involve risks and uncertainties, the actual results and performance of the Company may differ materially from the results expressed or implied by such forward- looking statements. Given these uncertainties, readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements. Unless otherwise required by law, the Company also disclaims any obligation to update its view of any such risks or uncertainties or to announce publicly the result of any revisions to the forward- looking statements made here; however, readers should review carefully reports or documents the Company files periodically with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
posted
legal...i think glass is refering to the paid pumpers...the ones on the master list that got free shares, pumpers like green baron, wille & sterling. ppl like you just took the bait...well maybe the bait, the hook, the line, the reel & rod & most of the boat.
-------------------- "keep your stick on the ice & your cup firmly in place" Posts: 3651 | From: Algonac, MI. 48001 | Registered: Jun 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
C'mon bill, you're gonna hurt noah's feelings. Are you saying he's just a second class pumper? He works hard it. Maybe he never recommended a buy, but he sure leaves a trail of inluential slime. Guess everyone couldn't get paid for punping. Some fools do it for free.
[ August 18, 2005, 23:18: Message edited by: will ]
-------------------- A million seconds is 13 days. A billion seconds is 31 years. Posts: 4893 | From: Burbank IL USA | Registered: Feb 2004
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by glassman: leagalale, it will be interesting to see if the internet pumpers get caught up in the justice net.....
Ya know glass, it's nice of you to warn me. You know just for my own good and all. We go back a long way on this thread, and I really doubt that you can find a post where I recommended CMKX to anyone. I bring information and opinion here. Mine and others, for people to read and make up their own minds. If I am "guilty" of anything, it is believing in this stock and attempting to answer the bashers here and show everyone that there may be another side to this story that they haven't heard, or even thought of,yet.
sayounds lahk ya gotta geeyuilty conscience thar dude, ah've seen pleyenty of crimes committed on this stock.... the first time i heard about cmk??? somebody was posting they had a freind in canada that called them on the phone and said he saw diamonds coming out of the ground while they were drilling... and then there's the "buy it for the orphans" people, LOL... 800 billion shares sold? that sounds like quite an organisation to me, and an interstate org at that ... that's RICOH bayeeebeee... i guess freedom of speech goes a long way, but fraud in this case would really be about what/how much one knows and what one doesn't know.... in this case? it didn't take me long to figure out thyy were dumping shares, all i had to do was look at the times and sales and add it up...
-------------------- Don't envy the happiness of those who live in a fool's paradise. Posts: 36378 | From: USA | Registered: Sep 2003
| IP: Logged |
Joined: Dec 2004 Gender: Male Posts: 351 Re: 7500 W. Lake Mead, #9627, Las Vegas « Reply #21 on Today at 11:16pm »
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- according to the clark county assessors site david coffey our old auditor lives at 2813 channel bay dr and john m edwards lives at 2817 channel bay dr it also shows that coffey bought his house from first colony merchant the signatur of coffey as buyer is followed by his past address which was 8221 emerald ave las vegas nevada which was sold to coffey by first colony merchant president john edwards and lists first colony merchant address as 7500 w lake mead the same address as cmkx and most of edwards companies. now you have a solid connection between edwards and coffey cmkx auditor. edwards set up at least 38 trading accounts at a "nevada broker dealer" which is also the only mm in nevada in 2003-2004 and surrendered a huge ammount of shares during that time. i find it interresting myself as we can not get an audit because a past accountant isnt supplying info to the company. eh? ~Phx
Posts: 2375 | Registered: Nov 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
It is funny how the cult and Frizzle seem to link others to CMKX's crime yet CMKX seems to say nothing about it. The company is in a free fall and near final revocation. But the owner takes the fifth with a personal laywer present. Maheu knows nothing and no auditor will touch the records with a ten foot pole. They keeo trying to ling the accountants to others and blame them. But they seem to forget that no one else wants the job. If this was legit then why is it so hard to find someone to audit the books? I know that legal will claim a conspiracy but does that matter in the end. We reasonable people know there is no conspiracy but as with most cults the brainwashing just will not let them see the truth.
-------------------- Invest with your brain not with your heart. Posts: 4405 | From: Bristol, Tn, USA | Registered: Aug 2004
| IP: Logged |
A. I think we heard of them around December of '04 when a -- we got a referral from a business -- a guy we did business with, and he said the company would be looking to hire an auditor. Q. Who was that person?
A. Mr. John Edwards."
Who is John Edwards?
First witness, Neil Levine, CPA. January 10th 2005 he was hired to audit and he has not gotten any papers to perform the audit. John Edwards, a friend of Levine was the one who got Neil and CMKX together. Neil said the company wanted to file the reports so they could go to a higher exchange.
And what does Edwards do? Owns CRWN, one of the largest shorters of CMKX.
Pedro2004 Dr. Of Diamonds
member is offline
Joined: Apr 2005 Posts: 220 Wow! What's with EDWARDS and CROWN? « Thread Started on Today at 12:42pm »
9. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES The Company has entered into arrangements with organizations, including clearing brokers, which provide for indemnification against losses, costs, claims and liabilities arising from the performance of their obligations under our agreement, except for gross negligence or bad faith. The Company believes the likelihood of a claim being made, the adverse outcome of which, individually or in the aggregate, that can be predicted with any reasonable certainty, could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition and operating results, is remote.
10. CAPITAL STOCK During the three months ended October 31, 2004, the Company issued in privately negotiated transactions 4,824,244 shares of Company common stock not registered under the Securities Act for net cash proceeds of $1,525,000. Shares totaling 4,748,486 were issued to unaffiliated accredited investors and shares totaling 75,758 were issued to an executive officer of the Company.
During the nine months ended October 31, 2004, the Company issued in privately negotiated transactions 7,031,632 shares of Company common stock not registered under the Securities Act for gross cash proceeds of $3,561,101. Placement fees totaling $35,180 were paid to two placement agents in connection with this share issuance. Shares totaling 6,302,086 were issued to unaffiliated accredited investors and shares totaling 729,546 were issued to executive officers, or family members of executive officers.
Financing Activities The cash inflow from financing activities in fiscal 2004 was due to a combination of seven common stock private placements totaling $4,995,725, two cash contributions to equity totaling $1,830,000, a sale of assets totaling $980,000 and option exercises totaling $448,698. The first private placement commenced in February 2003 and raised $340,000 through the issuance of 377,776 shares to employees. The second private placement commenced in March 2003 and raised $293,150 through the issuance of 205,000 shares to employees. The third private placement commenced in March 2003 and raised $2,419,050 through the issuance of 1,612,161 shares to employees, a director and a private investor. The fourth private placement commenced in October 2003 and raised $100,000 through the issuance of 28,986 shares to an employee. The fifth private placement commenced in November 2003 and raised $811,650 through the issuance of 348,347 shares to employees and directors. The sixth private placement commenced in November 2003 and raised $110,000 through the issuance of 50,000 shares and 5,000 warrants to a private investor. The seventh private placement commenced in December 2003 and raised $921,875 through the issuance of 526,786 shares to current and former employees, plus a private investor. The Company took possession of municipal bonds from J.S.A. Investments LLC that were subsequently liquidated into cash of $1,700,000 on October 17, 2003. In May 2003, the Company completed a transaction with Martin H. Meyerson, the Company’s former Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, totaling $1,350,000, whereby he made a $130,000 cash contribution to equity, he purchased $980,000 of assets and he reimbursed the Company for $240,000 of expenditures related to certain regulatory matters.
In March and April 2005, Mr. Edwards through the Trust and MFCC made a series of purchases of CFGI Series A Convertible Preferred Stock (“Preferred Stock”) in a private placement. The purchase price of each share of the Preferred Stock was $148.00. Mr. Edwards is the sole beneficiary of the Trust and the sole stockholder of MFCC. The purchases of the Preferred Stock were financed directly or indirectly from the personal assets of Mr. Edwards.
What Percentage?
(25.7%) + (13.5%) + (12.2%) = 51.4% of the Preferred Shares
posted
You can blame everyone you want Legal. Try and connect the dots to make you feel better but in the end just because shady people are connected to CMKX doesn't make CMKX clean.
Holes in books. Why did UC keep such bad records? I keep better records and I am bad at it.
Dilution to 778 billion shares. and 500 billion in last year. Thats an average of 2 billion shares sold per day last year alone. Doesn't even include normal trading of the stock.
UC took the fifth and you can spin it all you want about the sellers but he could have taken the fifth on that information if that was all there was to it. Judge would have been more then understanding if he stated there was a non disclosure clause in the contracts.
Auditor claims apparent illegal transactions.
Lied on form 15. And it bullcrap to think he didn't know. If he didn't he incompetent at best. But really, everyone knows the truth.
Still hasn't filed.
No proof of anything. Keeps shareholders in the dark.
Lied about o/s, business address, and form 15. Got to love a CEO that lies to its shareholders, but its for our own good.
This is just the start of it. And this piece of crap Phxgold has been a proven liar too. After it was proved the 360 weren't Indian tribes he tried to cover it up. The 84% seller ownership was not only stupid when he made it up and made the cult believe it. He doesn't even apologize for his ignorance. So what does he do, makes up more theories to get people like legal to fill there koolaid cups up again.
-------------------- Invest with your brain not with your heart. Posts: 4405 | From: Bristol, Tn, USA | Registered: Aug 2004
| IP: Logged |
Topic Closed
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
Printer-friendly view of this topic
![[Roll Eyes]](rolleyes.gif)
