posted
All of a sudden you know what a "conflict of interest" is, legal? Not that long back, you didn't know until I had to explain it to you about 3 or more times.
Interesting the way you like to answer for all the others who might be OG members. You have taken on the "mouthpiece" function? If I were them, in view of your proclivity toward spinning and distorting, I would check it out for myself.
Looks like you looked up a word I had previously used too. Saw you recently used it. "redacted" You sure do like to use others' talents as your own, huh?
Posts: 3607 | From: NJ - Outside Phila. | Registered: Mar 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
Wallace i thought you were brighter than this, i've been waiting for your tips a long time now,,, you made me miss the windfall only you could give me. when will you give me the tips oh helpful one. If i was your neighbor you would help me.
COBRACOBRA
-------------------- I don't play well with others, and have a problem with authority. I love to see the big guy fall to the under-dog. Posts: 192 | From: New Jersey - Armpit of the World | Registered: Jul 2005
| IP: Logged |
I will give you a "tip". You wrote: "If i was your neighbor you would help me."
My tip is that the proper grammar is "If I were", not "was". Got it? See if you can remember that for about 5 minutes.
Posts: 3607 | From: NJ - Outside Phila. | Registered: Mar 2004
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Wallace#1: All of a sudden you know what a "conflict of interest" is, legal? Not that long back, you didn't know until I had to explain it to you about 3 or more times.
Interesting the way you like to answer for all the others who might be OG members. You have taken on the "mouthpiece" function? If I were them, in view of your proclivity toward spinning and distorting, I would check it out for myself.
Looks like you looked up a word I had previously used too. Saw you recently used it. "redacted" You sure do like to use others' talents as your own, huh?
First of all Wallace your prior explanation of "confict of interest" was in the wrong context. But I forgave you and let you off the hook.
Where was I acting as a mouthpiece for the other shareholders? Are you going there about my reduction of the Frizzell statement you went on and on about, to simple terms you could understand. You wanted the answer because you couldn't understand him, so I made it simple.
Actually I have never seen you use the word redact, but recalled it from a poster at PB 32 this morning. If I had known that you had an exclusive right to the word, I certainly never would have used it, Mr. Webster.
And I also notice that as DD material is being poured out by Pedro, that you are still sitting here bashing me, Frizzell, anyone convenient to your purposes, rather that doing any real research into the information being provided.
You really should look at these documents, there is a tremendous amount of "real" bashing information that you can spin.
Posts: 2375 | Registered: Nov 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
oh my wallace,,, ya got me there. you've corrected my sentence structure. why would you insult me with the 5 minute memory thing, i will remember it longer then that because i can g............ uh, uhmm, where was i again,,,, oh yes i remember,,,,,,how will i ever repay you. I am glad you were there, i could have looked foolish. almost as foolish as an old man taking the time to correct a mess. brd. post. If you want to insult someone try another fool. this one doesnt play nice with others,,,,,, but dont worry wally i wont do anything that will get me banned. i am sure you are waiting for it so you can report any little action to the mod. sorry, try again. good night angel-lips, sweet dreams
COBRACOBRA
-------------------- I don't play well with others, and have a problem with authority. I love to see the big guy fall to the under-dog. Posts: 192 | From: New Jersey - Armpit of the World | Registered: Jul 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
WOW Wallace, look at all those General Ledgers. Here's your chance to do a proper interpretation of the entries for your "merry men", so that they know you really are educated in accounting principles as you have been bragging.
Posts: 2375 | Registered: Nov 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
legal i know he has been around for a LONG time but i didn't know he had been around since the days of robin hood. uh oh i should capitalize that before he corrects it,,,LOL And before you mention it Wally, i do know that robin hood was fiction, much like your trading skillz. cobra
-------------------- I don't play well with others, and have a problem with authority. I love to see the big guy fall to the under-dog. Posts: 192 | From: New Jersey - Armpit of the World | Registered: Jul 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
cobra, not saying he's old, but he's getting out his comptometer now to work up some numbers for us from the Ledgers. Then he will post his "redaction" for our enlightenment.
Posts: 2375 | Registered: Nov 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
Wow, it just became clear to me about Legaleagle....I now know who he is..!!! He's ... URBAN CASAVANT. It's as plain as that Fort a la Corne Kimberlite 122 diamond encrusted ore sample in your pocket. Why else would anyone stay here so long antagonizing people like he does. Legal ..er ... Urban is using this board as research for his next project. It's like the boss nobody has ever seen, coming into work as a client to spy on his workers....It's perfect I tell you. Thank ya, thank ya very much ..........
S5
-------------------- Eagles may soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.... Posts: 400 | From: Jupiter, somewhere out there | Registered: Jun 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
geez ric if you are going to swipe from pb 32 then at least say where you got it..........
-------------------- I don't play well with others, and have a problem with authority. I love to see the big guy fall to the under-dog. Posts: 192 | From: New Jersey - Armpit of the World | Registered: Jul 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
well well well, i'd say old pedro has been a busy guy. still looking for facts there cobra??? might be you can find a few in all those documents. 1 thing that sits funny if you notice the date when computer clearing got 500 billion shares 4/30/2004 look at the letter from dvorak, just under 200 billion & thats feb 2004 that equals 700 billion. i personally called the state of nevada when the o/s was raised from 500 billion to 800 billion & that was just before the divys own by date in august. the o/s had gone to 800 billion the day before.....a/s is 500 billion in april yet there are 700 billion issued by the company. that doesn't include the bahama stuff, the eton properties stuff.....by the way cobra those are facts & i only had to read to get them, black & white, not trying to glue this clown to that crook stuff.... i'd say UC was printing shares so fast he forgot to increase the a/s before the o/s passed it by. i think the term for that is naked shorting.
-------------------- "keep your stick on the ice & your cup firmly in place" Posts: 3651 | From: Algonac, MI. 48001 | Registered: Jun 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
lets see, i said 360 of UC's buddies from his prison days & ppl around where he lived. i was quickly pointed to the great DD done that showed the Cree Nation had 72 clans each with 1 head & 4 assistants or 360 indians...wonder why the 360 listed don't have any indian names? i did notice the entire casavant family in that list & wasn't that the secratary for SGGM that is related to UC in there, denise curran?? a bit about 29 companys...i'm wondering how the Quapple toffey company helped a mining company to the tune of 50 million shares?
my suggestion to legal, cobra & the folks at pb32 is quit doing your DD & start making toffee. it looks as if its a cheaper way to profit from cmkx stock & much more fun then trying to tie every Tom, Dick & Harry to a real mining company or somebody with cash & might have walked by the cmkx office/ UC's home.
-------------------- "keep your stick on the ice & your cup firmly in place" Posts: 3651 | From: Algonac, MI. 48001 | Registered: Jun 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
Someone asked what all that exhibits meant. I think he summed it up quite well.
BungWad God of Diamonds Joined: Aug 2004 Posts: 532 Re: ***All of the SEC Exhibits rolled up into 1 po « Reply #18 on Today at 2:16am »
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- In basic terms, it means UC used stock as money, his money, to pay for pretty much anything he could trade them for.
There won't be any audit because there is no way UC kept documents or acctg to explain why each of the hundreds or thousands of different people and entities were given stock. Look at the reasons given, most of them are laughable. Revocation as a final outcome is almost a certainty at this point.
UC paid for everything in stock and when that dried up, he raised the A/S and did it again. Then he did it again.
I will let everyone make up their own minds what this pattern of issuance and surrender means for the NSS theory.
He has a new 3.5 million dollar house and an irrevocable trust but can't afford his race committments or American Mine payments.
When the company was made aware that difficult questions were being asked about the business address, which we now know was a complete lie, their response wasn't to come clean but to try to "make reality fit the lie".
These documents paint a very bleak picture.
-------------------- Invest with your brain not with your heart. Posts: 4405 | From: Bristol, Tn, USA | Registered: Aug 2004
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Ric: Someone asked what all that exhibits meant. I think he summed it up quite well.
BungWad God of Diamonds Joined: Aug 2004 Posts: 532 Re: ***All of the SEC Exhibits rolled up into 1 po « Reply #18 on Today at 2:16am »
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- In basic terms, it means UC used stock as money, his money, to pay for pretty much anything he could trade them for.
There won't be any audit because there is no way UC kept documents or acctg to explain why each of the hundreds or thousands of different people and entities were given stock. Look at the reasons given, most of them are laughable. Revocation as a final outcome is almost a certainty at this point.
UC paid for everything in stock and when that dried up, he raised the A/S and did it again. Then he did it again.
I will let everyone make up their own minds what this pattern of issuance and surrender means for the NSS theory.
He has a new 3.5 million dollar house and an irrevocable trust but can't afford his race committments or American Mine payments.
When the company was made aware that difficult questions were being asked about the business address, which we now know was a complete lie, their response wasn't to come clean but to try to "make reality fit the lie".
These documents paint a very bleak picture.
I guess the racing teams wouldnt take stock instead of money. The only question remaining in my mind is "Can we get anything back from this"? The answer is probably a resounding "NO".
-------------------- If I give you bad information, please feel free to sue me. I have nothing left anyway. Ed Posts: 1772 | From: Oxford, PA, USA | Registered: Oct 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
mark today down legal, ya might want to remember it...lol i will have to agree with you on a point. frizzy was brought in at john martins request, a big kool-aide drinker. nobody in the cult thought cmkx was anything except godlike. roger glenn got involved didn't he? mahoo was on board. these guy's certainly would not be part of a scam. thus frizzy went in thinking that cmkx was ok & the o/s was high because naked shorting caused UC to sell shares to pay for mining expences. at the first meeting UC of course knew he had to keep these documents secret thus the non-disclosuer. my guess is frizzy stepped into it before he knew just what it was he was stepping into. now had he listened to the bashers he is so worried about he might not have sign that non-disclosuer. but then us bashers had no idea what we were talking about. we had no facts, we just wanted to protect the mm's shorting cmkx.
[ July 23, 2005, 10:09: Message edited by: bill1352 ]
-------------------- "keep your stick on the ice & your cup firmly in place" Posts: 3651 | From: Algonac, MI. 48001 | Registered: Jun 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
"There may come a time and a company that facts arise which will lend itself to litigation."
notice he didn't say use CMKX??? all the facts about a company will be needed & those facts had better say its a solid honest company. cmkx does not qualify. NS'ing is stealing billions for investors but so are companies like cmkx. you can't go into this with a scam like cmkx has your flagship. seems as if i remember this being said on this boards many times.
the cult has been screaming about a mm squeeze driving up the pps well again well.......
"The ultimate outcome of everyone’s investment hinges not on naked shorting or SEC actions, but on the true evaluation of the company assets. We have some information about these assets, but we need more. The more I find out about the company, the more I become concerned that neither the company nor the SEC wanted you to know about the evaluation of the assets at the Administrative Hearing.
the SEC had legal reasons for objecting in court, company value as well as illegal trading had nothing to do with filing. it is the info you might find out thru filing but neither stop a company from filing. the SEC case was for not filing period as they stated many times. the company on the other hand would want value hidden for only 1 reason, there is none. the SEC is trying to shut them down. UC needs shareholder support. he has to have shareholders believing cmkx has huge value thus if it did he would have told you by now, if not in court then in an 8k after court. stocklien may have tried to get it out in court but not very hard. filing proven value in an 8K makes it as public a records as it does in court & as the judge said anything filed up to the end of june would be considered. if stocklien really wanted company value to be looked at or known we would know it.
-------------------- "keep your stick on the ice & your cup firmly in place" Posts: 3651 | From: Algonac, MI. 48001 | Registered: Jun 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
I think it is funny that some of the serious koolaid drinkers are bashing padro now for posting this information. I think Jack Nicholson summed it up best, "You want the truth, You can't handle the truth"
Blame the messenger but never blame UC or RG. Even with overwhelming facts they refuse to see the truth. The evil SEC is the blame for filing charges against us. We did nothing wrong but they revoke us anyway. Yeah right.
-------------------- Invest with your brain not with your heart. Posts: 4405 | From: Bristol, Tn, USA | Registered: Aug 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
And the people who see this for what it really is get labeled bashers and banned from boards for pointing out these inequities. It will take some time for this to play out, but I think the cult has some very unpleasant things coming up shortly. Revocation is only the first step. If someone can prove these allegations against UC, he wont be living in a 3.5M house for long. Of course, this is all just IMO......LOL.
-------------------- If I give you bad information, please feel free to sue me. I have nothing left anyway. Ed Posts: 1772 | From: Oxford, PA, USA | Registered: Oct 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
geezzzes, so many non-facts backing up what we have been saying here at allstocks for so long its hard to cover them all...lol. legal you have said a few times you had hoped by me going into pb32 i might see the light & join the cult so to speak well let me extend my offer to you. i hope that by reading the shareholder list & other papers pedro got, looking at who got shares & when, money spent on the $60 million gem buy in december 2004 still on the books, when cmkx really knew the SEC was after them, reading frizzys update & doing this with an open mind, i hope you see the light & join the bashers side. you can of course extend this invite to all you PB32 buddies because here at allstocks freedom of speach & thought has never been banned.
-------------------- "keep your stick on the ice & your cup firmly in place" Posts: 3651 | From: Algonac, MI. 48001 | Registered: Jun 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
notice in the feb 2003 letter to the t/a john edwards wasn't mentioned? bagel said quit contacting desormeau & UC these shares are authorized. insiders were dumping & we know who those insiders are.
-------------------- "keep your stick on the ice & your cup firmly in place" Posts: 3651 | From: Algonac, MI. 48001 | Registered: Jun 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
Give it time bill, you know as well as I do that this is going to spawn a whole load of new "feel good" theories.
Posts: 5729 | From: Wisconsin | Registered: Sep 2003
| IP: Logged |
posted
you mean 50 or 60 aren't already out there Up??? we know the fact that as the only board member every stock issuance had to be signed by UC for the t/a to then issue them has no real meaning. why anybody could have signed them. bagley sent that letter to the t/a to cover everyone involved azz & keep saintly UC in the dark. why i bet they were forging his signature on everything & UC is such a saint he won't blow the whistle on his old pals even if it means all his shareholders become bagholders. now THATS loyalty.
-------------------- "keep your stick on the ice & your cup firmly in place" Posts: 3651 | From: Algonac, MI. 48001 | Registered: Jun 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
I think they're going to open a nationwide chain of "Casavant Toffee & Coffee" kiosks located in every mall in America and somehow tie it in with diamonds.
Posts: 5729 | From: Wisconsin | Registered: Sep 2003
| IP: Logged |
Topic Closed
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
Printer-friendly view of this topic
