Allstocks.com's Bulletin Board Post New Topic  New Poll  Post A Reply
my profile login | register | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Allstocks.com's Bulletin Board » Micro Penny Stocks, Penny Stocks $0.10 & Under » CMKX - May 10 - 05 D-Day - The next chapter (Page 44)

 - UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!   This topic comprises 87 pages: 1  2  3  ...  41  42  43  44  45  46  47  ...  85  86  87   
Author Topic: CMKX - May 10 - 05 D-Day - The next chapter
Ric
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Ric     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Also the public isn't buying shares of the SEC. Us as individuals don't lose our personal money by the SEC being late. When a public company is late the filing may have something in it that causes a person to get in or out of the stock. And filing late may cause someone to lose money because they don't have the information to make a solid investment choice.

Besides, I worked for the government for years. 6 months late is ahead of time IMO, lol.

--------------------
Invest with your brain not with your heart.

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Wallace#1
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Wallace#1         Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I remember when it took that long to get an IRS rebate check.
IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Wallace#1
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Wallace#1         Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Hey Ric, I got zapped by another Cult Member. Don't know if source is Christian Trader, OG Member, general Cult Member or from one of the pumper forums like Dr.Dementia's, etc. No big deal and hope they enjoy their second of extreme pleasure....probably much like a self-induced climax to them. LMAO

PS: And they say they don't read this forum!??!?!

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Ric
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Ric     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I got zapped yesterday.

--------------------
Invest with your brain not with your heart.

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Ric
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Ric     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
otis.campbell
26 May 2005, 10:32 PM EDT
Msg. 966633 of 966690
Jump to msg. #
To the paid bashers. You are ruining my investment. I did a lot of DD before I bought this stock and I know I bought a winner. We have 50M of jade, we have diamonds we have an honest CEO.
OK, we do have a few SEC filings missing and we do have a "little" bit of dilution and we are currently under SEC inquiry and have not had significant revenuse in the past, but it is all the fault of bashers and shorts.
703 BILLION O/S isn't bad. Many companies have even
more(I think). Our float is maybe 50% of the O/S. That is my guess(IMO). Plus we have congressmen on our side.
ABGG said Bush is now involved and it will become a big re-election issue. (IMO)
This is going to be the biggest Wall Street scandal ever and CMKX will bring down Wall Street. You just watch you Hedge Hog lying stinking shorters.

ROTFLMFAO

--------------------
Invest with your brain not with your heart.

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Ric
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Ric     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Really though. I see CMKX and all that is going on. I really do have a hard time understanding how someone could see this as an investment. Legal once said that all the bashers have is 703 billion o/s. thats not really true but really what else do you need. They divert attention to NSS but if we have it or not have it what difference does it make. 703 billion o/s and well over 300 billion is float. The lies, hiding information, taking the 5th, not filing, SEC investigation, 30 million in debt, and everything else still doesn't say as much as 703 billion o/s.

I just can't figure these people out. It is easy to see for me. Oh well.

[ May 26, 2005, 23:23: Message edited by: Ric ]

--------------------
Invest with your brain not with your heart.

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Wallace#1
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Wallace#1         Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Really like that man's(otis.campbell) insight, Ric. LOL
IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Ric
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Ric     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I liked it, lol.

--------------------
Invest with your brain not with your heart.

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Wallace#1
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Wallace#1         Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
"Good night, Mrs.Kalabash, who ever you are."

How many of you remember that? Know dwman will remember.

Good night.

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Upside
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for Upside     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Jimmy Durante's closing line, right?
IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
legaleagle
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for legaleagle     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
You all seem to be out of things to say. Take this apart:


By: go2guy2
26 May 2005, 10:58 PM EDT
Msg. 218901 of 218925
Jump to msg. #
Look into Gary Walters, Rick Tauli and especially BBX Equities. Where do I begin...Pull up a chair. In Nanosignal, BBX equities acquired a large position of the company somehow, Gary Walters also acquired alot of shares. John Edwards won a settlement from NNOS for $200,000 for services rendered..Anyway, it was rumored that NNOS was being pumped by Tauli and Walters all the time they were shorting against their almost majority position in NNOS. From what I read, they did this to a few other companies to..RAMO comes to mind...Ok, so I believe that before Barrington Foods became UCAD, our Boy Rendall went to BBX equity (run by Walters) for financing. Somehow BBX equities, IMHO, gets it's grip on a large portion of UCAD....I think through the Crystalix Connection (Dhonau, Woodward, BSIC Investors etc..)....and they in turn set their sights on CMKX. Now, I don't think Rendall is that smart, and I don't think Ed is that crooked, but I do think they would not be apposed to having the Sasketchewan Claims fall into their lap. At the same time, I think they realize that the good folks at BBX are going to do the same to UCAD, and Nevada Minerals if they can, so they see a benefit in playing along. Ed makes a mineral rights for shares agreement and UCAD buys an interest in CMKX.
So, Woodward and Michael King are involved in Crystalix. BBX Equity has a Michael King listed as a director.
Michael King runs Princeton Research website a stock touting operation.
He was also appointed to CMKM board in Nov 2002 along with Richard Taulli

Richard Taulli is also listed as treasurer of UCAD.

John S Woodward is president of UCAD.

John S Woodward is also listed as president of Crystalix, though
'resigned'

These guys have their fingers in CMKX and UCAD and CRYSTALIX and...THE PUMP IS ON FULL BLAST! All the while they are shorting the HE** (double hockeysticks) out of all of them. Then Crystalix screws up and they cannot buy Lazer Tek..Lazer Tek is awarded Crystalix's assets and assumes the name Crystalix with a new man in charge who grabs Woodward by the throat and takes away his voting rights...Kevin T. Ryan, partner in Global Intelligence Network with one Iron Bob Maheu...and they realize what is hapening. They see why Crystalix was in trouble. And I believe they hold grudges too. Meanwhile back at the ranch, Urban realizes that the insiders are short selling his company into oblivion. Oh my, he needs help..and he needs a plan. IMHO, he and Kevin Ryan hook up over some hotdogs at the race track. Its about this time that D Roger Glenn comes into the picture. Hmmmm. Now, I know that Roger has taken alot of heat...I still say he will be redeemed at some time. Roger sets up the dividends and traps the NSS. In September, CMKXTREME loans Crystalix a few Million. Then , In MY humble opinion, Roger calls in the SEC when he realizes that forces are trying to prevent the companies from filing. I think the party was supposed to reveal the Board of Directors and major share holders for both companies...and those people do not want their identity known. So much so that they threaten Urban and Rendell, and leverage information which might put the claims in jeopardy. UC is trapped and stays gagged. The SEC steps in because RG and IBM have given them info regarding the manipulation of these stocks. We watch USCA skyrocket and split and then get stopped. Now we're in a "quiet period" and RG tells Dhonau..."Ed, get out of CMKX or you will put it all in jeopardy and I'll introduce you to Bubba, your new roomate personally". Ed gives back the 75 Mill in Certs and they go into Urban's hands. "Check"...SHO is coming, you'll have to settle soon shorty Finally in February, IBM has had enough, sho is ineffective. Urban brings him on board as Co Chairman..and Roger goes onto USCA...but he's never announced as their compliance attorney..hmmm. Langley is introduced somewhere in there...Its just really messy. Well, if you've been in since January, you can put the rest together. In February or May, UC sets up a private trust. In April that trust loans Crystalix another $Million.
Woodwards leins against Crystalix are to be subordinated to the leins held by Kevin Ryan and Urban.
I'm intrigued to see where this is going, but I've got a feeling tha all of UC's moves are carefully scripted.

Again, this is all my opinion..based on som light reading.

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Ric
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Ric     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
To be honest, there are a lot of shady deals and shady characters with this company. So what may or may not have happen, who knows. All these so called companies have traded company shares between each other and given divy's out like it meant something. If CMKX gives one company shares in exchange we get the other companies shares and they are given as divy's. It sounds good but what really happened. They diluted your shares so they could give you Divy's in other company. You would have been better off if they didn't dilute and got no divy's. Frizzle, I think is out of the loop now and is pulling at straws to make it look like he is doing something. I thought he was here to represent shareholders at the CMKX hearing. Now hes going off on his own to start something new and hopefully make more money. JMHO

--------------------
Invest with your brain not with your heart.

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Ric
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Ric     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Hey but UC still seems to make it out to the race track each week. Thats got to make the shareholders happy. Got CMKX

--------------------
Invest with your brain not with your heart.

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
bill1352
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for bill1352     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
isnt otis cambell the drunk on andy griffin???

otis.campbell
26 May 2005, 10:32 PM EDT
Msg. 966633 of 966690
Jump to msg. #
To the paid bashers. You are ruining my investment. I did a lot of DD before I bought this stock and I know I bought a winner. We have 50M of jade, we have diamonds we have an honest CEO.
OK, we do have a few SEC filings missing and we do have a "little" bit of dilution and we are currently under SEC inquiry and have not had significant revenuse in the past, but it is all the fault of bashers and shorts.
703 BILLION O/S isn't bad. Many companies have even
more(I think). Our float is maybe 50% of the O/S. That is my guess(IMO). Plus we have congressmen on our side.
ABGG said Bush is now involved and it will become a big re-election issue. (IMO)
This is going to be the biggest Wall Street scandal ever and CMKX will bring down Wall Street. You just watch you Hedge Hog lying stinking shorters.


who ever posted this had to be drunk...close to brain dead drunk...the drunken stupidity of that post is dangerous to the minds of unsuspecting readers....must be the same otis cambell & goober must have been helping

--------------------
"keep your stick on the ice & your cup firmly in place"

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
bill1352
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for bill1352     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
2005-05-27 03:30:41
B: Equity Bridges Financial Relations: CMKX owners group update on the battle of naked short sales of CMKX securities ( M2 PRESSWIRE )

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


May 27, 2005 (M2 PRESSWIRE via COMTEX) -- Wayne Pedersen, President of Equity
Bridges Financial Relations, comments on The CMKX Owners Group that is battling
naked short sales in CMKM Diamonds Inc. (Pink Sheets: CMKX).

This news release is primarily being sent out to alert investors of CMKX that
may not be aware of updates from the CMKX Owners Group.

I am pleased to announce that John Martin and Bill Frizzell have started mailing
out letters to all of the shareholders that have not faxed in their statements
to Frizzell Law Firm. We believe that these people may not be reading message
boards and even press releases so John and Bill are taking on this huge
administrative task on behalf of you the stockholder. Right now there are
approximately 7,000 stockholders that have faxed in their statements. There are
approximately 52,000 stockholder accounts remaining. John and Bill have hired
temporary staff to help out with this huge administrative task.

I am also pleased to announce that a great deal of stock has already been
accounted for out of the 7,000 stockholders that have stepped forward. When the
remaining stockholders are contacted, Bill anticipates having overwhelming
evidence to prove beyond a reason of a doubt that a naked short position exists
in CMKX. What does that mean for stockholders? This means that all of us will
have made history in coming together as a team of investors fighting for "what
is right". I am not aware of any investor group representing a single company
ever coming together as a team to fight naked shorting. Everyone involved needs
to pat themselves on the back for helping out not only themselves but their
fellowman.

Counterfeiting is illegal, whether it be money or securities. Selling non
existent stock to many of CMKX investors will not be tolerated. We the investors
of CMKX have the power to make a difference. Who really owns true shares of CMKX
besides the cert holders? A very interesting video to watch titled "Where's my
Stock?" is located on the home page of the Christian Financial Radio Network.
The link is: www.cfrn.net Be sure to listen to the interview with CMKX
shareholder, attorney, Bill Frizzell, which is also located on the home page.

--------------------
"keep your stick on the ice & your cup firmly in place"

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
bill1352
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for bill1352     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Bill anticipates having overwhelming
evidence to prove beyond a reason of a doubt that a naked short position exists
in CMKX. What does that mean for stockholders? This means that all of us will
have made history in coming together as a team of investors fighting for "what
is right". I am not aware of any investor group representing a single company
ever coming together as a team to fight naked shorting. Everyone involved needs
to pat themselves on the back for helping out not only themselves but their
fellowman.
================================================


if you notice nowhere does it say you will get money, a raise in pps, a short squeeze, a cash settlement or anything of monatary value.

i will agree that if the OG proves a huge naked short & it gets the attention of the powers that be in a way that changes things then the CMKX OG deserves a standing ovation from every penny trader out there.

--------------------
"keep your stick on the ice & your cup firmly in place"

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
ed19363
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for ed19363     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Officials said the GAO started its audit in the spring of 2004 and ended on Feb. 11. The GAO issued a draft unqualified opinion on the SEC's financial statements in early May, they said.

It took a year to audit the ENTIRE SEC !!!!!
Makes you wonder why it takes longer for a small diamond company to do the same.

--------------------
If I give you bad information, please feel free to sue me. I have nothing left anyway.
Ed

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
CHIMAN34
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for CHIMAN34     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
NOT sure if this was already posted.

GAO: SEC Lacks Effective Report Controls

The Associated Press
Thursday, May 26, 2005; 6:57 PM

WASHINGTON -- The Securities and Exchange Commission, which enforces rules mandating strong internal controls for public companies, itself lacks effective oversight of its financial reporting, congressional investigators say.

Congress' Government Accountability Office, in a report released Thursday, found "material internal-control weaknesses" in the SEC's recording of fines and restitution to investors that it wins in settlements with companies and individuals, its preparation of financial statements and the security of its information. As a result, the report says, the watchdog agency "did not maintain effective internal control over financial reporting as of Sept. 30, 2004."



The inadequate controls over the information systems increase the risk that confidential and sensitive SEC data could be altered or lost, possibly without agency staff being aware of it, the report says.

"The risks created by these information-security weaknesses are compounded because the SEC does not have a comprehensive monitoring program to identify unusual or suspicious access activities," the GAO says.

The agency said it's working to improve its controls in all the problem areas.

SEC officials said Thursday that the agency will add new staff to handle financial reporting and establish an internal committee, similar to a corporate board of directors' audit committee, to correct deficiencies.

"We're holding ourselves to the same standard we hold public companies," said SEC spokesman Matt Well. "We're disclosing these material weaknesses and explaining how we intend to remediate them."

Earlier this month, the SEC issued guidelines that allow flexibility for companies in implementing the provisions of a landmark anti-fraud law that mandates stronger internal financial controls. Many companies have complained that the requirements under the 2002 Sarbanes-Oxley Act, born of the corporate scandals, are too burdensome and costly.

The U.S. Chamber of Commerce, one of several business groups that have urged revision of the rules, said that the GAO's new findings prove its point.

"Our position could not be clearer or better proven," the group said in a statement. "The federal agency charged with upholding the integrity of corporate financial statements is unable to properly manage its own controls."

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
legaleagle
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for legaleagle     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by ed19363:
Officials said the GAO started its audit in the spring of 2004 and ended on Feb. 11. The GAO issued a draft unqualified opinion on the SEC's financial statements in early May, they said.

It took a year to audit the ENTIRE SEC !!!!!
Makes you wonder why it takes longer for a small diamond company to do the same.

I don't think the SEC was being naked shorted.
IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
ed19363
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for ed19363     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Explain one thing: IF (big IF) CMKX is shorted, why would they NOT publish the share structure as they believe it to be to expose the short instead of doing the lawyer bit? Seems to me that would be a simpler way, and how could they get in trouble by reporting the truth?
This, IMO, is why the situation is unbelievable !! By not publishing their share structure it APPEARS (there's that word again) that they have something to hide, and that engenders distrust. So publish it and let the SEC and DTC prove it wrong.

--------------------
If I give you bad information, please feel free to sue me. I have nothing left anyway.
Ed

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
legaleagle
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for legaleagle     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by ed19363:
Explain one thing: IF (big IF) CMKX is shorted, why would they NOT publish the share structure as they believe it to be to expose the short instead of doing the lawyer bit? Seems to me that would be a simpler way, and how could they get in trouble by reporting the truth?
This, IMO, is why the situation is unbelievable !! By not publishing their share structure it APPEARS (there's that word again) that they have something to hide, and that engenders distrust. So publish it and let the SEC and DTC prove it wrong.

ed, it's in Stoecklein's hands now. Attornies only release sensitive information to judges and the principals while in litigation. They did release share structure a couple of months ago. What you want is the float, as do we all. And that will be turned over to the judge and the SEC at the appropriate time. Again, "shareholder impatience" is not part of the criteria that Stoecklein is operating under. And if a settlement agreement is being negotiated, we won't hear anything until it is finalized.
IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Ric
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Ric     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Your so funny Legal. You have to keep it up. They will tell us in due time when they feel its right for us to know. roflmao

Sorry but its a reporting company, they suppose to let us know every quarter. And since the stockholders also own the company then the deserve the answers now not when its they feel likw it. Its not stockholder impatience, its lies to cover up the P&D. There is no other reason to hide share structure which includes float and insider shares. The gave us O/S, thats all, thats not share structure.

--------------------
Invest with your brain not with your heart.

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
ed19363
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for ed19363     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I have to agree with Ric on this one. We arent asking for the moon, only what we are entitled to as shareholders.
I have been playing the market for almost 40 years, and have NEVER seen a company run like this one. It just doesnt make sense.

--------------------
If I give you bad information, please feel free to sue me. I have nothing left anyway.
Ed

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
bill1352
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for bill1352     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
since when is share structure sensitive info??? when did the o/s become sensitive info?? when did the float become sensitive info??? applying for a patent?,,,thats sensitive info at least the process of getting to applying for the patent is. how many shares & who owns what??? thats required info. as legal pointed out we only qualified for the o/s info 2 months ago. makes ya wonder what the accountants need to do to qualify for the info needed to report if it takes the shareholders over 2 yrs to get the o/s. the only thing sensitive about the float will be UC's azz after angry shareholders turn a flamethrower on it. remember there are 56,000 shareholders, only 5200 ran to join the OG the rest must not be cult members. another 1800 sent in shares owned info but only after it was free to do. they have to send letters to everyone else to get the shares owned. that leaves a possible 49,000 angry shareholders & thats where sensitive comes in.

--------------------
"keep your stick on the ice & your cup firmly in place"

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Ric
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Ric     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
My theory is that the cult doesn't want to know the share structure. It would put holes in so many of there theories. Its like Fuzzy Frizzle Math, they want to believe they have a random sample so they can apply it to the rest and make a huge NSS out of it and using Fuzzy Frizzle Math does just that. All the paid pumpers are sign up so you have the largest holders of the stock in it. Sterling, Willy, Dr. D, John Martin, And all the CT, RB, Pro boards, and Paltalk cults have signed up. These are the people that followed these paid pumpers and bought massive shares. They are the 7000. The little guys that only spent $500 or less on a wild card are the ones that aren't part of the group or could care less about these boards.

So as long as they can believe Fuzzy Frizzle Math and that UC is keeping things from us for our own good then they can continue there theories and dreams of being a millionaire off a .00006 stock.

--------------------
Invest with your brain not with your heart.

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
bill1352
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for bill1352     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
someone posted they thought frizzy & cmkx aren't buddy buddy right now...i think that might be the case. he got a list of who holds what but can't say chit & he implied there were a few stockholders that he had questions about. how they got shares, exactly 1 of the points canada & the SEC brought up. i wonder if the gag comes off if & more like when the judge shuts it down.

--------------------
"keep your stick on the ice & your cup firmly in place"

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Ric
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Ric     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I heard that too bill. From what I heard, Frizzle has been taken completely out of the loop and the company isn't giving him anything. But why should they, he only supposed to have represented them at the hearing and thats over. And since the company doesn't give shareholders any information on the company then why give a lawyer of the shareholders any information.

--------------------
Invest with your brain not with your heart.

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
bill1352
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for bill1352     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
any company that won't give the accountants they are paying what they need sure as h**l won't give the shareholders & even more so the lawyer for said shareholders anything. i wonder if even he knows the float. if he has a clue i bet it didn't come from cmkx.

--------------------
"keep your stick on the ice & your cup firmly in place"

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
ed19363
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for ed19363     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Kinda thought that might happen. Frizz is gonna end up whipping the same dead horse we have been beating for a year or more.
UC just doesnt want ANYONE to know what he is doing. Betcha even Stoeklein didnt get everything he asked for either. There is no reason for UC to cooperate with any of them, or us. IMO, it comes down to the SEC to settle the matter.

--------------------
If I give you bad information, please feel free to sue me. I have nothing left anyway.
Ed

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
legaleagle
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for legaleagle     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
The difference with Frizell and Stoecklein is that they have a SEC enforced deadline. After over a year, I can wait.
IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
bill1352
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for bill1352     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
frizzy doesn't have any deadline legal...he is your lawyer. now to get the judge to read the NS report yes but the fact is he can gather info till he has enough shares or he feels the NS isn't worth chasing. if he has enough that its outragous he can take that to the SEC, the courts wherever as long as he has the proof. shares stay in your accounts after bankruptcys, & a stock being shut down, until you ask to have them cleared from your account. you have to sign a form & snail mail it in.

--------------------
"keep your stick on the ice & your cup firmly in place"

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
legaleagle
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for legaleagle     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I am sure Frizzell wants to get the NS filed before the judge rules.
IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
legaleagle
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for legaleagle     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
.0002 SALE


Trip 2 just went through and looks legit. Had been trading around .00009. Not likely a fat finger, so probably trading around the .00015 range. Up 100% since the beginning of the week's quad sevens.

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Ric
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Ric     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I bet the company attorney doesn't know everything except what he had to have. Not sure he even got all that. Because it is funny that UC had a personal lawyer at the hearing for himself. Why do you need a personal lawyer at a hearing for the company? You have a company lawyer that could advise you on taking the fifth. To me a personal lawyer is needed to protect yourself not the company. I think UC knows he could go to jail if everything comes out, JMHO.

You know the best way to hide something is to pretend your trying to give it.

quote:
Originally posted by ed19363:
Kinda thought that might happen. Frizz is gonna end up whipping the same dead horse we have been beating for a year or more.
UC just doesnt want ANYONE to know what he is doing. Betcha even Stoeklein didnt get everything he asked for either. There is no reason for UC to cooperate with any of them, or us. IMO, it comes down to the SEC to settle the matter.



--------------------
Invest with your brain not with your heart.

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
ed19363
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for ed19363     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
It'll be weeks before we find out...that's the hard part.

--------------------
If I give you bad information, please feel free to sue me. I have nothing left anyway.
Ed

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
  This topic comprises 87 pages: 1  2  3  ...  41  42  43  44  45  46  47  ...  85  86  87   

Quick Reply
Message:

HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.

Instant Graemlins
   


Post New Topic  New Poll  Post A Reply Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


Contact Us | Allstocks.com Message Board Home

© 1997 - 2021 Allstocks.com. All rights reserved.

Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.2

Share