Allstocks.com's Bulletin Board Post New Topic  New Poll  Post A Reply
my profile login | register | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Allstocks.com's Bulletin Board » Micro Penny Stocks, Penny Stocks $0.10 & Under » CMKX - May 10 - 05 D-Day - The next chapter (Page 2)

 - UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!   This topic comprises 87 pages: 1  2  3  4  5  ...  85  86  87   
Author Topic: CMKX - May 10 - 05 D-Day - The next chapter
legaleagle
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for legaleagle     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
WRITTEN SUMMARY by portrush, for the MARTIN MP3 above.

Diamondologist

member is offline

Gender:
Posts: 408
Re: Martin update MP3
« Reply #7 on: Today at 3:18pm »

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Transcript of John Martin call:

I have made some minor edits to his comments, but the bulk of it was here. A couple words were missing but I think I captured the gist of it for you. There is one word missing in the last sentance. If you know what he was referring to PM me and I will edit this. Thanks!

portrush
______________________

The hearing is going to go late tonight. The judge is concerned about getting everyone into the courtroom.

She even brought in chairs to allow everyone in the courtroom. She was very concerned that people got to witness it if they wanted to.

The judge made it clear she has to go back to Washington and read the transcripts when this is done.

No one can tell her how to rule. No one has asked her how to rule. She will rule under her won decision. She made a comment about that so the shareholders will understand that she is a lady with her own mind and she is not listening to someone directing her and telling her what to do.

She started going through a process of admissibility of different evidence. She ruled that other evidence/exhibits can be brought to her until mid-July. Which is extremely good for us.

Frizzell is and has been extremely involved. Involvement in the hearing has been quite a bit, in other words.

The judge ruled that the NS is not going to be admitted into evidence but wants to know what it is. She asked the SEC if they are willing to admit that CMKX is naked shorted and their answer was no.

Bill got up immediately and asked the court if he was allowed to talk about naked shorting in the hearing and she said yes.

They stated with opening statements; Leslie Hakala said essentially CMKX is operating in secrecy and in the shadows lining their pockets. That is essentially what she said.

Martin notes; Wow, the judge is actually to ask the SEC and CMKX to settle the case, the judge is seemingly very concerned about he group of shareholders and the SEC does not want to settle the case.

Donald Stocklein with his opening statement said: the company filed their schedule 15 by mistake and they didn’t have to file. There has been $250K spent with Edwards and Engles and nothing was done…and almost $2million spent in getting filings done and we don't have them yet. We’re doing everything we can to get them done.

Frizzell got up at that point and thanked the judge for allowing the shareholders to be there and then he responded to a comment she made that she was amazed there were billions of shares in this company and he said “Your Honor there are not billions of shares in this company, there are trillions of shares in this company.”

Problems were being resolved, Frizzell said, please make a note of the NSS situation throughout the hearing.

(Witnesses called.)

First witness, Neil Levine, CPA. January 10th 2005 he was hired to audit and he has not gotten any papers to perform the audit. John Edwards, a friend of Levine was the one who got Neil and CMKX together. Neil said the company wanted to file the reports so they could go to a higher exchange.

The SEC’s contention was the company was not registered…registering a reason for the shares issued. The judge was surprised at the number of shares issued…she was referring to a 3-billion share issuance. Levine said it would take 90 days to audit once he got all the paperwork.

Don Stocklein stood up to cross examine. He seems to be building a case that pink-sheet companies don't need to file, if they have under 300 investors.

Cross by Frizzell, wanted to know if Levine knew the man that got them together (Levine/CMKX) had an extremely large holding position in CMKX. Bill was trying to find out why Levine resigned one day before the hearing. Frizzell was ‘tearing it up” and the judge kept telling Bill to be careful where he is was leading and the crowd seemed pleased with what he was saying.

Cross by Stocklein was trying to get Levine to tell the court how/if the additional shares would affect the auditing. In other words, would the additional shares (just floating around out there) above the issued shares affect the auditing. Stocklein finished at the point.

Frizzell got back up and asked how would other audited shares show up other than issued shares? Everyone in the courtroom objected.

Other witnesses: Chris Wall, who is IT specialist for the SEC in LA questioned about the Green Baron webcast on 10/18/04 and that CD was entered as evidence.

Stocklein and Frizzell passed on the cross examination of this witness.

Helen Bagley, the First Global transfer agent. Ms. Hakala questioned why First Global was not their agent for about a week. If you remember they were not employed for about a week then came back on board. (he doesn’t remember specifics, but there was a rift between them and the company and they fixed it over this period of time)

They talked about the shareholder list. The judge is asking questions about outstanding shares. This is all in relation to the 698 shareholders that were actual shareholders in 2003.

Cross by Stocklein about the DTC and the shared (? ) program which was objected to. He was able to get around that objection and question differently and Frizzell passed on that objection.

He understands the hearing will go late tonight.

End

portrush

http://cmkxdiamond.********s32.com/index.cgi?board=general&action=display&num=1115757331

Posts: 2375 | Registered: Nov 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
will
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for will     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I cannot believe that the Judge is ignorant of NAKED SHORTING.
She allowed it to be entered, and maybe discussed, but it doesn't mean it will have any bearing on her decision regarding the sins of ommission and commission by CMKX. Means nothing or very little.
Mr. Frizzell Esq. is just priming y'all for another dip into your pocketbook. He recognizes fanaticism and is smart enough to "help" ya'll out. The first $25 a head was the easiest money he ever made, the next $25 to $50 a head will be easier now that the NS issue MIGHT be on record. Shucks, who knows, y'all might be willing to raise the price of prostitution and fly right by that $50 mark in your zeal to be right and try another dead end avenue to save your bacon.


quote:
Originally posted by legaleagle:
SHE ALLOWED THE ENTRY OF THE SHAREHOLDER STATEMENTS, SO SHE HAS ALREADY ADMITTED EVIDENCE OF THE NAKED SHORT, AND RULED THAT IT COULD BE DISCUSSED IN THE HEARING. BUT THEN AGAIN, SHE ALSO HAD TO ASK WHAT NAKED SHORTING IS.



--------------------
A million seconds is 13 days.
A billion seconds is 31 years.

Posts: 4893 | From: Burbank IL USA | Registered: Feb 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
bill1352
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for bill1352     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
The SEC’s contention was the company was not registered…registering a reason for the shares issued. The judge was surprised at the number of shares issued…she was referring to a 3-billion share issuance. Levine said it would take 90 days to audit once he got all the paperwork.


it should read 300 billion


Cross by Stocklein about the DTC and the shared (? ) program which was objected to. He was able to get around that objection and question differently and Frizzell passed on that objection.

? = borrow

--------------------
"keep your stick on the ice & your cup firmly in place"

Posts: 3651 | From: Algonac, MI. 48001 | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
bill1352
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for bill1352     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
SHE ALLOWED THE ENTRY OF THE SHAREHOLDER STATEMENTS, SO SHE HAS ALREADY ADMITTED EVIDENCE OF THE NAKED SHORT, AND RULED THAT IT COULD BE DISCUSSED IN THE HEARING. BUT THEN AGAIN, SHE ALSO HAD TO ASK WHAT NAKED SHORTING IS.


not what martin said...he said she asked what it was, not what was naked shorting. the twists begin

--------------------
"keep your stick on the ice & your cup firmly in place"

Posts: 3651 | From: Algonac, MI. 48001 | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Wallace#1
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Wallace#1         Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by bill1352:
legel i think he was saying she asked what the count was not what was naked shorting. i listened again & i think in his haste it came out sort of like that. the judge would have to know what nss is to be on this case. he said no eveidence allowed but she wanted to know what it was as in how big a short or a final count.

Like I said, she would hardly rule against NSS being admitted as relevant evidence if she did not know what it is.
Posts: 3607 | From: NJ - Outside Phila. | Registered: Mar 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
will
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for will     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Means nothing that she let it in. She will see it, make note of it, then rule on the charges that are before her.

It's a courtroom, not a message board full of inuendo, theories, and nonsense. Facts will be considered as they relate to the charges nothing else will have room in her judgement.

--------------------
A million seconds is 13 days.
A billion seconds is 31 years.

Posts: 4893 | From: Burbank IL USA | Registered: Feb 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
bill1352
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for bill1352     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
ok..this will be the cults first point of twisting everything. did not say what is naked shorting. by morning the cult will be screaming she doesn't belong there because she doesnt know what nss is. here is legels link go to 1 min 45 seconds on the link. legel, stop the twisting of words now please...head over to the cult boards & get it heading in the right direction please...lol

legaleagle
Member


Member Rated:
posted May 10, 2005 17:24
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CLEARER LINK: http://www.cooljay.net/c3/martin_may10_2005.mp3
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posts: 909 | Registered: Nov 2004 | IP: Logged |

--------------------
"keep your stick on the ice & your cup firmly in place"

Posts: 3651 | From: Algonac, MI. 48001 | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Ric
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Ric     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Actually someone posted that the Judge held up a shareholders letter and said that some shareholders seem to think I am stupid and the letter supposed to be this one:

May 4, 2005

Honorable Brenda P. Murray
Administrative Law Judge
450 5th Street Northwest
Washington, DC 20549
By facsimile

As a CPA, formerly with Price Waterhouse in Washington, DC, I am aghast and mortified that the court would entertain such an absurd request from the Division regarding the “irrelevancy” of a possible NSS in the matter of CMKM Diamonds as it may relate to its inability to file accurate financial statements.

It is my personal opinion, that unless, you are a CPA and trained in the preparation and understanding of financial statements, you do not possess the knowledge and or the qualifications to preside over an administrative hearing for a failure to make periodic filings of financial statements.

The very idea that the share structure of a company is not part of the financial statements and is irrelevant is preposterous. One cannot possibly file completed financial statements and omit the section of the Balance Sheet titled “Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity”. The very idea of such nonsense is gross negligence at the very minimum.

A basic accounting formula is Assets = Liabilities + Stockholders’ Equity. That is accounting 101 and preparation of financial statements 101. To ignore that the stockholders’ equity section is an integral part of the Balance Sheet and thus part of the financial statements is to be beyond ignorant in the knowledge of properly constructed financial statements.

Any attorney in the enforcement division working for the SEC who would entertain that idea let alone officially argue that the very share structure of a company’s financial statements is irrelevant should not only be sanctioned but should have their law license revoked and his/her brain examined.

As a CPA I am aghast at the Divisions in Limine Motion to exclude anything that would go directly to the preparation of the stockholders’ equity section of the balance sheet. The balance sheet is a required financial statement and is often accompanied by a separate breakdown of the stockholders’ equity section thereof. This separate statement is known as the Shareholders’ Equity Statement.

For your information, the Shareholders’ Equity Statement is designed as follows:

Balance, beginning of period [shares o/s x pps]
Common stock issued [naked, legal or otherwise it’s out there]
Common stock repurchased
Stock-based compensation expense
Stock-option income tax benefits/deficiencies
Other, net
Balance end of period

From the stockholders’ equity section of the basic balance sheet, primary f/s:
Stockholders’ equity:
Common stock and paid-in capital- shares authorized _____; outstanding ____
Retained earnings (deficit)
Total stockholders’ equity
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity


Page 2 of 2

No words come to the mind of this CPA after reading the Division’s ridiculous and absurd position that anything having to do with the proper and accurate construction of the shareholders’ equity section of the balance sheet would be anything other than relevant.

In fact and of course all shares are relevant to the shareholders’ equity section of the balance sheet, naked or otherwise. If they’re out there, they must be included in the total shares outstanding field of the balance sheet.

I predict complete negligence and perhaps disbarment in your future if you do not possess the proper credentials and knowledge to understand the matter before you. Whatever school you went to for your education should be brought to trial if you cannot see that the shareholders’ equity section of the balance sheet is an integral component of properly constructed financial statements and is impossible to construct without the known share structure.

--------------------
Invest with your brain not with your heart.

Posts: 4405 | From: Bristol, Tn, USA | Registered: Aug 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Ric
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Ric     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Just out. Urban is on the stand pleading the Fifth as we speak.

--------------------
Invest with your brain not with your heart.

Posts: 4405 | From: Bristol, Tn, USA | Registered: Aug 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
bill1352
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for bill1352     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
thats the letter legel posted a few days ago as being sent to the judge. i sure hope she did & i bet the cult doesn't want to hear the judges reply...lol. to borrow a phrase...that dingbat is saying every filing that states a companies share structure in any way & does not include the NS shares is illegel & charges can or will be brought by the SEC. so NS either only effects cmkx or a few thousand companies need lawyers fast...lol

--------------------
"keep your stick on the ice & your cup firmly in place"

Posts: 3651 | From: Algonac, MI. 48001 | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
will
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for will     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Now, isn't that forthright and forthcoming. The faithful will see it as part of "The Master Plan", the final episode in "Springing The Trap".
Maybe the final episode of "Exposing The Crap"!

--------------------
A million seconds is 13 days.
A billion seconds is 31 years.

Posts: 4893 | From: Burbank IL USA | Registered: Feb 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
bill1352
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for bill1352     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
i'd say that means either the lawyers think he is such a moron its to big a risk to let him speak or he is guilty...lol

--------------------
"keep your stick on the ice & your cup firmly in place"

Posts: 3651 | From: Algonac, MI. 48001 | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Upside
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for Upside     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Originally posted by Ric:
quote:
Just out. Urban is on the stand pleading the Fifth as we speak.
A spy for Debeers must be in the courtroom if he's pleading the fifth.
Posts: 5729 | From: Wisconsin | Registered: Sep 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
legaleagle
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for legaleagle     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
georgeburns
God of Diamonds


member is offline


Wherever there is confusion there is profit.




Gender:
Posts: 6866
LONG UPDATE
« Thread started on: Today at 4:50pm »

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CDLIC is at the hearing and just passed me this information:

Hearing started as scheduled at 9:30am.
SEC on left, Stoecklein and Owners group on right.
Hakala is doing all presenting and cross cross examining for the SEC.
The courtroom is full but apparently, everyone could fit. They brought in chairs for some.
There about 52 people there not including the lawyers. About 8 in staff behind the lawyers.

SEC opened with their case. Stated CMKX has failed to file, wont file, donft have the means to file, and donft intend to file. Because of that, the SEC Division of enforcement wants CMKXfs registration revoked.

Stoecklein countered that we are trying to file, will file, and want to file.

Frizzell started to bring up the NSS topic. The judge stated that she had already ruled that NSS wasnft to be spoken about. Both the SEC and CMKX side were both confused. The judge stated that she had ruled but apparently her staff didnft fax it out. She stated that she will hear about NSS as it comes up through the trial.


SEC First Witness: Auditor hired by CMKX in January. (Levine, I think) Apparently the SECfs purpose in bringing the auditor was to show that CMKX didnft want to file. The auditor was hired in January and hadnft received any documents from CMKX to work with. 100,000 dollars retainer to hire auditor. The auditor resigned the day before the hearing.

CMKX cross of auditor: Tried to show that the auditor was recommended by a major stockholder of CMKX that apparently against CMKX now. They found it odd that they resigned the day before the trial and are wondering if there are ulterior motives on the part of the Auditor.

SEC Second Witness: Glenn Wall (SEC IT guy) was wearing a bow-tie and glasses.
Submitted a CD of the Green Baron webcast with CMKX as evidence into the hearing. Brought in a chart showing the massive volume increase after the GB Webcast. Tried to indicate that the volume was caused by a Green Baron pump. (pump word was not used).

250,000 was spent on Edwards and Angells Roger Glenn. Glenn was asked for all his work when they were done with him. Glenn produced 1 piece of paper to give to the company. Apparently Glenn wasnft so great.

Over 1 million dollars have been spent on filing so far. CMKX keeps getting screwed by auditing and accounting companies.

Judge doesnft seem to know about NSS or what it is, but maybe she does.

Urban has apparently lent large sums of money to the company. This looks good as it show he believes in the company.

Another witness: Lady hired by Stoecklein to do the accounting for CMKX.
SEC tried to show that she had not received any information from CMKX and that CMKX was dragging their feet. Lady said no, I have received information from CMKX. I have received a big binder of cancelled checks, I have received contracts showing where all the stock has gone, the TAfs records.
SEC crossed asking her if she had received various other documents, she said no, but she is expecting it.

It came up that the company is run out of Urbanfs house. The judge said that that was strange. The SEC jumped on the fact that Urbanfs wife had signed or cosigned some of the checks. They asked if she was an officer of the companyc Said Urban was ill for a period of time and she was his wife and thatfs what wifes do.

She wasnft cross examined by the CMKM team because she is a witness of ours later.

The donft want the witnesses biased so they must wait outside the courtroom till after they testify at which time they can sit in on the trial.

Maheu, Dhonau, Urban. They are waiting on Rendall Williams but he has been delayed.

CDLIC guessing first CMKX witness after lunch will be Maheu.

Rumor: Head of the SEC is present.

Unbelievable amount of money spent on attorneys and such. Roger Glenn turning out to be a bad guy.

Over the past year over 1.25 million has been spent on one accountant and almost nothing received.

Talked about the JADE collection. Company said that transaction was reversed. SEC trying to bring the Jade thing. Stoecklein accountant is showing that the Jade thing is cancelled and reversed and that it doesnft matter. Waiting on final documentation to cancel the Jade collection deal on the books.


(I am not responsible for errors above. I am not responsible for translation errors above. CDLIC spoke pig latin the whole time so it was confusing. Remember you are getting this from me, who heard it on the phone from a guy in the court room. This is third party information.)

Posts: 2375 | Registered: Nov 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
bill1352
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for bill1352     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
ok..i want my basher checks very soon & i want a raise. i'm getting a headache hearing the crap on the christian radio...the music S**KS

--------------------
"keep your stick on the ice & your cup firmly in place"

Posts: 3651 | From: Algonac, MI. 48001 | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Doctoall
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for Doctoall     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Ric:
Just out. Urban is on the stand pleading the Fifth as we speak. [/Q


Urban= Scammer [Big Grin]

--------------------
Be Careful Of The Toes We Step On Today, They Could Be Attached To The Butt We Have To Kiss Tomorrow

Posts: 4727 | From: Elk Grove ( Sacramento )CA USA | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Doctoall
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for Doctoall     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Ric:
Actually someone posted that the Judge held up a shareholders letter and said that some shareholders seem to think I am stupid and the letter supposed to be this one:

May 4, 2005

Honorable Brenda P. Murray
Administrative Law Judge
450 5th Street Northwest
Washington, DC 20549
By facsimile

As a CPA, formerly with Price Waterhouse in Washington, DC, I am aghast and mortified that the court would entertain such an absurd request from the Division regarding the “irrelevancy” of a possible NSS in the matter of CMKM Diamonds as it may relate to its inability to file accurate financial statements.

It is my personal opinion, that unless, you are a CPA and trained in the preparation and understanding of financial statements, you do not possess the knowledge and or the qualifications to preside over an administrative hearing for a failure to make periodic filings of financial statements.

The very idea that the share structure of a company is not part of the financial statements and is irrelevant is preposterous. One cannot possibly file completed financial statements and omit the section of the Balance Sheet titled “Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity”. The very idea of such nonsense is gross negligence at the very minimum.

A basic accounting formula is Assets = Liabilities + Stockholders’ Equity. That is accounting 101 and preparation of financial statements 101. To ignore that the stockholders’ equity section is an integral part of the Balance Sheet and thus part of the financial statements is to be beyond ignorant in the knowledge of properly constructed financial statements.

Any attorney in the enforcement division working for the SEC who would entertain that idea let alone officially argue that the very share structure of a company’s financial statements is irrelevant should not only be sanctioned but should have their law license revoked and his/her brain examined.

As a CPA I am aghast at the Divisions in Limine Motion to exclude anything that would go directly to the preparation of the stockholders’ equity section of the balance sheet. The balance sheet is a required financial statement and is often accompanied by a separate breakdown of the stockholders’ equity section thereof. This separate statement is known as the Shareholders’ Equity Statement.

For your information, the Shareholders’ Equity Statement is designed as follows:

Balance, beginning of period [shares o/s x pps]
Common stock issued [naked, legal or otherwise it’s out there]
Common stock repurchased
Stock-based compensation expense
Stock-option income tax benefits/deficiencies
Other, net
Balance end of period

From the stockholders’ equity section of the basic balance sheet, primary f/s:
Stockholders’ equity:
Common stock and paid-in capital- shares authorized _____; outstanding ____
Retained earnings (deficit)
Total stockholders’ equity
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity


Page 2 of 2

No words come to the mind of this CPA after reading the Division’s ridiculous and absurd position that anything having to do with the proper and accurate construction of the shareholders’ equity section of the balance sheet would be anything other than relevant.

In fact and of course all shares are relevant to the shareholders’ equity section of the balance sheet, naked or otherwise. If they’re out there, they must be included in the total shares outstanding field of the balance sheet.

I predict complete negligence and perhaps disbarment in your future if you do not possess the proper credentials and knowledge to understand the matter before you. Whatever school you went to for your education should be brought to trial if you cannot see that the shareholders’ equity section of the balance sheet is an integral component of properly constructed financial statements and is impossible to construct without the known share structure.

I told them that this letter would make friends [Big Grin] Also said that it was a bad idea to insult the judge. You go legal have others write the judge [Big Grin]

--------------------
Be Careful Of The Toes We Step On Today, They Could Be Attached To The Butt We Have To Kiss Tomorrow

Posts: 4727 | From: Elk Grove ( Sacramento )CA USA | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
legaleagle
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for legaleagle     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by bill1352:
ok..this will be the cults first point of twisting everything. did not say what is naked shorting. by morning the cult will be screaming she doesn't belong there because she doesnt know what nss is. here is legels link go to 1 min 45 seconds on the link. legel, stop the twisting of words now please...head over to the cult boards & get it heading in the right direction please...lol

legaleagle
Member


Member Rated:
posted May 10, 2005 17:24
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CLEARER LINK: http://www.cooljay.net/c3/martin_may10_2005.mp3
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posts: 909 | Registered: Nov 2004 | IP: Logged |

I HEARD WHAT JOHN MARTIN SAID ABOUT THE JUDGE AND NAKED SHORTING. I KNOW WHAT HE SAID. TRY TO SPIN IT HOWEVER YOU LIKE, BUT THIS TIME PEOPLE CAN LISTEN FOR THEMSELVES.
Posts: 2375 | Registered: Nov 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Wallace#1
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Wallace#1         Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I am not entirely sure how accurate that posted hearing information is but comment on the following:

"There has been $250K spent with Edwards and Engles and nothing was done…"

ANS: That is what all of us had been saying too. However, the Cult had him walking on water and performing all kinds of miracles. The real truth has been confirmed!!! What say you cult members to that???
------------------
"First witness, Neil Levine, CPA. January 10th 2005 he was hired to audit and he has not gotten any papers to perform the audit."

ANS: Remember, this was one of the people FizzleFrazzle had listed as his own witness. Obvious question is, Why hadn't Urban Casavant/CMKX given him "any" papers? They hide figures from the shareholders and from their own auditor.
-----------------
"Helen Bagley, the First Global transfer agent. Ms. Hakala questioned why First Global was not their agent for about a week.-----(he doesn’t remember specifics, but there was a rift between them and the company and they fixed it over this period of time)"

ANS: Convenient!!! Doesn't remember specifics?
Someone really should have dug into that question more deeply. Betting there is some real dirt there.
---------------

Posts: 3607 | From: NJ - Outside Phila. | Registered: Mar 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Ric
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Ric     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
How funny, Willy is mad and wants to know the truth. He is tired of them pulling his chain. Andy supposed to have told him not to look for a pps increase anytime soon the the release of UC's fifth the faithful is screaming, lol

--------------------
Invest with your brain not with your heart.

Posts: 4405 | From: Bristol, Tn, USA | Registered: Aug 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
bill1352
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for bill1352     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
GLEN WASN"T GOD!!!!!! who woulda thought that...lol. yes legel i picked on that 1 point because until now its the first i heard a cult member not say a prayer after his name. i'd say roger saw something he wanted no part of, great reputation on the line remember.

--------------------
"keep your stick on the ice & your cup firmly in place"

Posts: 3651 | From: Algonac, MI. 48001 | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Ric
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Ric     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
This is from his law firm below. I think this and UC's fifth is going to be the death of this.

quote:
Originally posted by Ric:
Mrs. Hakala questioned, her name was Suzanne Herring, she's an auditor for the Stocklein law firm. Essentially the line of questioning was about the books. She reported that the books were essentially non-existant, that she's been working towards getting the books together. The entire line of questioning was designed to is not a (can't make this part out) filer.



--------------------
Invest with your brain not with your heart.

Posts: 4405 | From: Bristol, Tn, USA | Registered: Aug 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Ric
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Ric     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I think after Roger found out how big a scam this was that he bought his time out until is contract was up and ran fast.

--------------------
Invest with your brain not with your heart.

Posts: 4405 | From: Bristol, Tn, USA | Registered: Aug 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
bill1352
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for bill1352     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
from a few things legel has posted since i'm getting the idea UC is a full fledge card carryin moron, i'm thinking 3 stooges class (for those that remember the short film with the union cards) thats why the 5th. maybe he was being honest, everyone he hires screws him. this guy might have actually thought he was doing the right thing. if it wasn't for the jade, the race cars & a new $5 million house this might be a sad case.

--------------------
"keep your stick on the ice & your cup firmly in place"

Posts: 3651 | From: Algonac, MI. 48001 | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Highwaychild
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for Highwaychild     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Man, this is some good stuff.Thanks for the updates Legal.And the humor guys(and the plni,Will)...Shakeman, Glenn is a A-hole!LOL
Posts: 2634 | From: The highway | Registered: Feb 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Wallace#1
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Wallace#1         Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Here's more from that info presumably from someone called CDLIC:

"CDLIC spoke pig latin the whole time so it was confusing."

ANS: Pig latin??? So they can say they did not get the info straight?

"It came up that the company is run out of Urbanfs house. The judge said that that was strange. The SEC jumped on the fact that Urbanfs wife had signed or cosigned some of the checks. They asked if she was an officer of the companyc Said Urban was ill for a period of time and she was his wife and thatfs what wifes do."

ANS: Ill with what? That heart problem again where he showed up at the race track following it? Just what shareholders need! A non-officer signing company checks? Sounds illegal to me. Also to whom were the checks made out.

"Unbelievable amount of money spent on attorneys and such. Roger Glenn turning out to be a bad guy."

ANS: More confirmation of what many of us had said time after time in the past. Guess who just might turn damaging evidence over to the SEC or end up being their witness against UC, CMKX and cohorts!

Posts: 3607 | From: NJ - Outside Phila. | Registered: Mar 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Wallace#1
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Wallace#1         Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Hwy,

"Shakeman, Glenn is a A-hole!LOL"

Like I said, Highwaychild, I DO enjoy your humor!
You must be joking! LOL

Posts: 3607 | From: NJ - Outside Phila. | Registered: Mar 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
bill1352
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for bill1352     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
what is the legel reason for taking the 5th again?? something about not incriminating yourself. hmmmmmm i wonder what could be behind that.

--------------------
"keep your stick on the ice & your cup firmly in place"

Posts: 3651 | From: Algonac, MI. 48001 | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Wallace#1
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Wallace#1         Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I LOVE IT!!!! Guess who is being proven correct!

What say you legal? UC pleading the 5th and Glenn having done nothing for $250K. Spin both, please!

How about posting some of the crap that is being said over on the CT CMKX forum, huh? Just how stunned are they now? What the hell did you cult members expect?

Posts: 3607 | From: NJ - Outside Phila. | Registered: Mar 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
bill1352
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for bill1352     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
i find it hard to believe no share structure brought up yet. if its a scam insiders own very little. if its a case of a moron running the show the insiders own a lot. auditor & roger jumping ship might hold a clue too...lol

--------------------
"keep your stick on the ice & your cup firmly in place"

Posts: 3651 | From: Algonac, MI. 48001 | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
bill1352
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for bill1352     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
hey wallace are we here still posting because we are egomaniacs needing to be proven right or is it just because we have no life & this is fun..lol

--------------------
"keep your stick on the ice & your cup firmly in place"

Posts: 3651 | From: Algonac, MI. 48001 | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
will
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for will     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Now that Glenn has been exposed as doing nothing except receiving $250K, I would like legal's comment regarding him. I would like to know his thoughts and debbie's thoughts now.
They touted him as beyond reproach with a sterling reputation. At one time he was one the MAIN reasons y'all believed in this company.

Have you changed your opinion now. I sorta kinda remember most of us negativity pumpers pegging him as a do nothing/done nothing kinda guy.

I have a feeling our opinions regarding alot of CMKX actions, and the opinions of people connected to CMKX will soon be proven correct.

So, there is one myth down, with more to come.

Does it mean nothing to you faithful, just gloss over it, and forget how wrong you judged him?

--------------------
A million seconds is 13 days.
A billion seconds is 31 years.

Posts: 4893 | From: Burbank IL USA | Registered: Feb 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Upside
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for Upside     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
originally posted by bill1352
quote:
hey wallace are we here still posting because we are egomaniacs needing to be proven right or is it just because we have no life & this is fun..lol
Both.
Posts: 5729 | From: Wisconsin | Registered: Sep 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Ric
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Ric     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
You left out the both option bill

--------------------
Invest with your brain not with your heart.

Posts: 4405 | From: Bristol, Tn, USA | Registered: Aug 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Wallace#1
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Wallace#1         Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Upside:
originally posted by bill1352
quote:
hey wallace are we here still posting because we are egomaniacs needing to be proven right or is it just because we have no life & this is fun..lol
Both.
Hey! Speak for yourself Upside! LOL
Posts: 3607 | From: NJ - Outside Phila. | Registered: Mar 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
  This topic comprises 87 pages: 1  2  3  4  5  ...  85  86  87   

Quick Reply
Message:

HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.

Instant Graemlins
   


Post New Topic  New Poll  Post A Reply Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


Contact Us | Allstocks.com Message Board Home

© 1997 - 2021 Allstocks.com. All rights reserved.

Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.2

Share