quote:We have fun in here. Maybe this stock has some sort of business activity but if they do they are keeping it to themselves. But really, would you want to invest in a company that refuses to report and gags the TA? But even then this stock has a o/s of 703 billion shares.
Take it one step further Ric. What if they were fully reporting and were doing bulk sampling with favorable results similar to Shore Gold. Pretty bright future on the surface. Then you find out they have a 700 billion o/s. Would you invest in them then? What if Debeers was public with a 700 billion o/s, would you invest in them? Absolutely not! It's just an incredible figure that defies imagination and ruins any chance of this "company" going anywhere.
Posts: 5729 | From: Wisconsin | Registered: Sep 2003
| IP: Logged |
posted
Besides the picture is of a Tricone Drill Bit used primarily for well drilling, oil, natural gas. They also can be used for foundation engineering, civil engineering and water wells. The teeth apply a shearing pressure to the rock, breaking it up into small pieces.
-------------------- Invest with your brain not with your heart. Posts: 4405 | From: Bristol, Tn, USA | Registered: Aug 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
I will try not to be overly dramatic about the effects on our stock of the market participants that see no problem violating SEC covering rules existing on the SEC books since the passing of the 1934 Act. To add to our challenge, we are slowly learning about another devious financing technique known as death spiral financing: this is a ******* child of naked shorting. The effects are the same for the most part except a takeover by the financier is sometimes an initial underlying purpose. I cannot confirm that CMKX management entered into any such agreement, but I have serious concerns about the distribution of our stock and how certain people came into possession of that stock. I will have more info for you as my investigation proceeds. As I see it, this is merely one more battle for us as a group. As our staff pours over stock transfer records and the NOBO/OBOlists, in conjunction with various pr’s and documents we have found from 2002 and 2003, we are piecing together a very detailed chronology of company events and transactions. I am not sounding an alarm nor am I ready to point fingers, but we are gaining the knowledge needed to proceed and help our company.
===============================================
legel i've always given credit when due even to the cult & i'd have to say it sounds like frizzy is giving you your $25 worth. it seems as if he is seeing the pattern us bashers have been complaining about & a theory a few of us have put out there. UC wants this company to go under. the claims can be transfered to another company & cmkx shareholders get nada, nothing, no money back. remember the accountant on the stand saying UC is supposed to have put his cash in, that cmkx was $36 million in the hole? no records given out or even keeped but she knew it was $36 million in the hole. cmkx gets cancelled the claims get sold to cover the debt & all the shareholders are left with is the hope of getting a NS type settlement....good luck on that one. as i've said & a few other how many shares does UC & family own? thats the key. forget other insiders just UC & family. if it almost nothing i'd say it proves the bashers right.
-------------------- "keep your stick on the ice & your cup firmly in place" Posts: 3651 | From: Algonac, MI. 48001 | Registered: Jun 2004
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by bill1352: it seems as if he is seeing the pattern us bashers have been complaining about & a theory a few of us have put out there. UC wants this company to go under. the claims can be transfered to another company & cmkx shareholders get nada, nothing, no money back.
The original investors who signed up with UC will get all claims if the company folds... UC would get nothing per the agreement in the 14c. I wonder who could be NSS the company? HMMMMM... Maybe just maybe this could be part of the picture?
-------------------- Wall-a** is a person who says it cannot be done, he should not interrupt a person accomplishing it. Posts: 86 | Registered: Apr 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
Oh ya you guys keep on talking about the OS but what is the float? I wonder how much UC and Co. own?
-------------------- Wall-a** is a person who says it cannot be done, he should not interrupt a person accomplishing it. Posts: 86 | Registered: Apr 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
legal wrote: "But your bigotry is evident, Wallace."
legal, I know more about Christianity than you could ever hope to know. I have probably even practiced it long before and far longer than you or anyone on your forum or band of hypocrites - including you. The only exception I have encountered to date is "dwman". He's an example for all of you to follow!!!
The same is true of securities trading and operations on Wall Street in general....whether you believe my background or not.
As I have told you numerous times. Just shut up and try to learn something of value.
Christianity and Christian Traders should have nothing to do with buying or selling stock....except maybe with a company that sells Christian books or the like. We all know that CT and OG are almost one and the same as far as Cult Membership is concerned.
Posts: 3607 | From: NJ - Outside Phila. | Registered: Mar 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
Well, well, well. Joeturdbowl (aks goferschit) has been heard from again and none of it makes any sense...as usual.
Posts: 3607 | From: NJ - Outside Phila. | Registered: Mar 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
i think the fact the cmkx as a company is trash is a given. i bet most of the cult knows this inside. the whole ball of wax is hooked to the NS now. notice frizzy never mentions insider holdings & is now starting to wonder about where & how shares were given out. the cert numbers almost prove insiders don't own much.
===========================================
I cannot confirm that CMKX management entered into any such agreement, but I have serious concerns about the distribution of our stock and how certain people came into possession of that stock.
============================================
remember lawyer do as the ppl paying them ask. if you want the death penalty they get out the way, if you want to fight they fight as long as it will not hurt their reputation. can you say roger glen? maybe he does have a good reputation & saw what it seems frizzy is finding out & bashers have been saying all long...UC is not on the shareholders side. and 1 of the first reasons CT pumps a stock is a christian board running the company. might be they got conned too.
-------------------- "keep your stick on the ice & your cup firmly in place" Posts: 3651 | From: Algonac, MI. 48001 | Registered: Jun 2004
| IP: Logged |
-------------------- Wall-a** is a person who says it cannot be done, he should not interrupt a person accomplishing it. Posts: 86 | Registered: Apr 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
joe please for your own good quit smokin crack...it will kill you. that 14c is long gone it was done & those ppl scammed a few yrs ago. getting shut down by the SEC is not bankrupt & any money owed by cmkx must be paid. lets see unexplored claims, no established value, some not 100% owned...$36 million sounds like a fair amount. wanna bet some paperwork shows up explaining where & how $36 million was spent after the SEC shuts it down? wanna bet no paperwork to file shows up before the SEC shuts it down?
-------------------- "keep your stick on the ice & your cup firmly in place" Posts: 3651 | From: Algonac, MI. 48001 | Registered: Jun 2004
| IP: Logged |
-------------------- Wall-a** is a person who says it cannot be done, he should not interrupt a person accomplishing it. Posts: 86 | Registered: Apr 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
now wallace that your comment is uncalled for...even more so since most of the time i dont pay attention to that chit either...lol
-------------------- "keep your stick on the ice & your cup firmly in place" Posts: 3651 | From: Algonac, MI. 48001 | Registered: Jun 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
by the way wallace...nice day on your HISC...i of course sold it yesterday because i watched 3 differant picks of mine run 150% or more & i had no cash free to jump in with & had 2 yesterday morning i wanted in on...the 1 i took is of course sitting where i bought at...lol
-------------------- "keep your stick on the ice & your cup firmly in place" Posts: 3651 | From: Algonac, MI. 48001 | Registered: Jun 2004
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by bill1352: now wallace that your comment is uncalled for...even more so since most of the time i dont pay attention to that chit either...lol
Problem with you, bill, is that "you're" just plain sloppy with grammar....not stupid. It's just "your" style". LMAO
Posts: 3607 | From: NJ - Outside Phila. | Registered: Mar 2004
| IP: Logged |
-------------------- Wall-a** is a person who says it cannot be done, he should not interrupt a person accomplishing it. Posts: 86 | Registered: Apr 2004
| IP: Logged |
DATE: MAY 16, 2005 TO: ALL PARTICIPANTS ATTENTION: MANAGING PARTNER/OFFICER, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CHIEF OPERATIONS OFFICER OPERATIONS PARTNER/OFFICER COMPLIANCE OFFICER
SUBJECT: RULE FILING APPROVAL – SR-NSCC-2004-09 On December 8, 2004, National Securities Clearing Corporation ("NSCC" or “the Corporation”) filed and on May 9, 2005 the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") approved rule filing SRNSCC- 2004-09, which consists of modifications to NSCC’s Rules and Procedures (the “Rules”) to memorialize the Corporation’s current standard of care and limitation of liability.
The approved changes create a uniform standard limiting NSCC’s liability to direct losses caused by NSCC’s gross negligence, willful misconduct, or violation of Federal securities laws for which there is a private right of action. In addition, the changes: (a) memorialize an appropriate commercial standard of care that will protect NSCC from undue liability; (b) permit the resources of NSCC to be appropriately utilized for promoting the accurate clearance and settlement of securities; and (c) are consistent with similar rules adopted by other self-regulatory organizations and approved by the Commission.
Questions regarding SR-NSCC-2004-09 should be directed to Allison Finnegan, Senior Associate Counsel, at (212) 855-3283, or to the undersigned at (212) 855-3203. Karen L. Saperstein Managing Director and General Counsel
Posts: 2375 | Registered: Nov 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
hmmmmmmmmmmmm...not sure if that was a slam or a pass....lol
-------------------- "keep your stick on the ice & your cup firmly in place" Posts: 3651 | From: Algonac, MI. 48001 | Registered: Jun 2004
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by bill1352: by the way wallace...nice day on your HISC...i of course sold it yesterday because i watched 3 differant picks of mine run 150% or more & i had no cash free to jump in with & had 2 yesterday morning i wanted in on...the 1 i took is of course sitting where i bought at...lol
bill,
Better safe than sorry. I am just being greedy with HISC. May be sorry in the end.
Posts: 3607 | From: NJ - Outside Phila. | Registered: Mar 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
Interesting legal... Why would they do this. Hmmm
-------------------- Wall-a** is a person who says it cannot be done, he should not interrupt a person accomplishing it. Posts: 86 | Registered: Apr 2004
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by joesturbo: Interesting legal... Why would they do this. Hmmm
Get set for another treatise.
PS: Please begin that treatise with a disclaimer as to experience, knowledge, etc. if you think it is applicable.
Posts: 3607 | From: NJ - Outside Phila. | Registered: Mar 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
now thats some crap legel...if it wasn't for cmkx legel i think we would be fighting the same battle...i emailed the SEC today from a link on the SHO list. the deal my sister's hubby has with ZAPZ will make them very rich but the short is killing the pps & you can't short sell OTC stocks thus being in the "failed to deliever" catagory since OTC was included april 14th is criminal.
-------------------- "keep your stick on the ice & your cup firmly in place" Posts: 3651 | From: Algonac, MI. 48001 | Registered: Jun 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted May 17, 2005 20:50 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Interesting legal... Why would they do this. Hmmm ==================================
not because of cmkx...but because of real honest companies that have been & are getting killed by NS'ing
-------------------- "keep your stick on the ice & your cup firmly in place" Posts: 3651 | From: Algonac, MI. 48001 | Registered: Jun 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
We have two sources that state the FLOAT is above 300 billion. Most of the O/S could be but we know for sure its over 300 billion. We just don't know how much more is the above part. Proof 1: In the March PR UC stated whats on the shareholders list. And all UC shares no matter how he got them must be on this list. All UC's shares, insider shares, cert holders, and JV's must be part of the shareholders list period. Proof 2: The OG, Frizzle has inferred that NSS hasn't been absolutely proven yet. He states that statisticaly it has which is wrong but he does state it. And knowing the group has 300 billion shares and NSS isn't absolutely proven yet then float hasn't been reached.
quote:Originally posted by joesturbo: Oh ya you guys keep on talking about the OS but what is the float? I wonder how much UC and Co. own?
-------------------- Invest with your brain not with your heart. Posts: 4405 | From: Bristol, Tn, USA | Registered: Aug 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
well Ric i think frizzy nailed it down even more today. gave the number of cert shares minus the ones listed on the OG site insiders cant be over 295 billion. if they bought shares on the open market & are held in street they violated another rule of the SEC.
-------------------- "keep your stick on the ice & your cup firmly in place" Posts: 3651 | From: Algonac, MI. 48001 | Registered: Jun 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
That might be the one good thing that comes out of this CMKX fiasco, but not for CMKX.
It will draw attention to the real problem of the NSS situation with other fine companies with worthwhile and competent management. That DOES leave UC and CMKX out of the mix.
Posts: 3607 | From: NJ - Outside Phila. | Registered: Mar 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
as a matter of fact if they own any more then was reported in 2003 they violated SEC rules & thus have more charges coming if this charge doesn't kill them...you cant own more then 10% & not file when that changes.
-------------------- "keep your stick on the ice & your cup firmly in place" Posts: 3651 | From: Algonac, MI. 48001 | Registered: Jun 2004
| IP: Logged |
-------------------- Wall-a** is a person who says it cannot be done, he should not interrupt a person accomplishing it. Posts: 86 | Registered: Apr 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
i hope you keep a copy joe...you'll need it when cmkx is toast.
-------------------- "keep your stick on the ice & your cup firmly in place" Posts: 3651 | From: Algonac, MI. 48001 | Registered: Jun 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
Someone posted one for crow kabobs a while back. That one sounded pretty good.
Posts: 5729 | From: Wisconsin | Registered: Sep 2003
| IP: Logged |
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
Printer-friendly view of this topic
