posted
Frizzel info FAQ/How do I.../Borker step-by-step (May 6/05)
Frizzel info FAQ/How do I.../Borker step-by-step (May 6/05)
mogoo Dr. Of Diamonds
member is online
"They say transparency is the great disinfectant" -Annette Nazareth, SEC Div. of Market Regulation
Gender: Posts: 228 Frizzel info FAQ/How do I.../Borker step-by-step « Thread started on: Today at 10:02am »
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- There are lots of questions out there, and I'm hoping to put info all in 1 post, so people don't have to search around. I've grabbed the following info from various threads, hoping to keep it consolidated it to one post. If you have any instructions for additional borkers, feel free to PM me, and I'll add it to my list.
Do I need to do this? YOU DO NOT HAVE TO BE A CURRENT OG MEMBER TO DO THIS However, this only needs to be done for electronic shares. If you hold certs, no verification needed (at this point)
Where do I send my info? Fax this info to 903-595-4249. (preferred) Or, email this info to nakedfax@cmkxownersgroup.com
What info do I need to send? From your March 2005 statement... 1. Your full name 2. Your Broker�s name(s) 3. Number of shares held electronically in account(s) 4. The CUSIP number [the number CMKX stock is assigned]* 5. Type of account(s) shares in which shares are held: Margin, Cash or Retirement You can black out ANY info besides these 5. *Don't get hung up on this. If you can't find it easily, you don't need to include it.
How do I compile the info? 1. A hard copy statement & a marker (to black out irrelevant info) 2. Copy & paste into an email. (really, that's all they need; an image of your statement isn't necessary.) 3. Scan in your statement to fax or email it from your computer. 4. Copy & paste from a PDF into an email. 5. Take a screen shot. This works for anything you currently have on your computer screen. On a PC, press the Print Screen button, then go to Microsoft Paint or Adobe Photoshop, open a new document and choose Edit-->Paste. Use the appropriate tools to black out any
How do I find my CUSIP#? Call your borker Copy from tax Form 1099 Check your order execusion conformation notice
How do I find this info in my online account? Ameritrade Click on ACCOUNT.....click History On the tabs...click Statements Where you see "View Statement For", bring up March 2005 and click View. At this point copy and paste in a email. Be sure to remove any info you do not want to send by backspacing over it after copy and pasting. *CUSIP# can be found by hovering your mouse over the Edit link for CMKX on your Account Balances page.
Etrade Go to Trading and portfolios Then GO to Account Records Then Select Acoount Statement Click on 03/31/2005 That is the one you need to send.
Schwab 1) Log into Schwab. 2) Click on the Account tab. 3) On the far right of the 2nd level of tabs, you'll see an eStatement tab. Click it. 4) Select March 01, 2005 - March 31, 2005 from the drop-down box. 5) Just above the statement, on the right, you'll see a text link called Printer-friendly Statement. Click it. 6) Presto! You've got your statement as a PDF.
posted
legel when you show me any kind of proof the UC holds even 100 billion shares i'll buy 2 million. if he doesn't hold more then 100 billion you sell 2 million. he doesnt need 51% of the common shares to vote anything in so thats not proof.
-------------------- "keep your stick on the ice & your cup firmly in place"
IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by bill1352: legel when you show me any kind of proof the UC holds even 100 billion shares i'll buy 2 million. if he doesn't hold more then 100 billion you sell 2 million. he doesnt need 51% of the common shares to vote anything in so thats not proof.
WE WERE KINDA HOLDIN' THAT FOR THE JUDGE BILL. YOU UNDERSTAND. BUT IF YOU HAVE TO WAIT, GET YOUR FINGER ON THE BUY BUTTON TUESDAY MORNING
IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by ed19363: Screw you Pal. I dont even give that kind of info to my relatives, what makes you think I'd give it to some unknown nut. Second, I dont believe I will ever see any profits from CMKX. It's a loser no matter how you look at it. Third, my investment entitles me to bitch if I want, I paid for the right.
I just emailed fizzle dizzle with my numbers, and without paying him $25. I didn't give him anything he could do damage with did I? Just name, broker, Cusip, # of sh., and that it is a cash account.
IP: Logged |
posted
yeah legal, why should we trust anything anybody involved in this has to say....
UC definitely concealed the dilution as best he could... i want to have a fair market too...
but don't you think the NS issue will actually have to be a law-suit filed by the shareholders against their OWN brokers for not verifying the presence/delivery of the shares they bought?
isn't YOUR OWN broker who you pay to protect you?
IP: Logged |
posted
legel my buy is ready if your sell is. when the SEC started this there was no mention of any company believed n/s. then after UC's new lawyers had a chance to look around & the cult started screaming all of a sudden UC is crying n/s chit. anybody call nevada to see if the a/s was just raised? sounds like a good time to print more shares if you ask me....lol
-------------------- "keep your stick on the ice & your cup firmly in place"
IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Upside: Legal, it appears that you believe the share structure will come out during the hearing Tuesday. Why?
THE JUDGE LEFT THE QUESTION OF SUBPOENAS FOR NS INFO OPEN FOR THE HEARING. THESE TYPES OF MATTERS ARE ADDRESSED AT THE OPENING OF THAT HEARING.
I EXPECT CMKX TO IMMEDIATELY MOVE TO REVISIT THE QUESTION OF SUBPOENAS FOR NAKED SHORT, THEN LAYING THE SHARE STRUCTURE PROOF ON THE JUDGES DESK, AND DEMONSTRATING THAT CMKX COULD NOT HAVE TRUTHFULLY COMPLETED THEIR FILINGS KNOWING THAT THE NUMBER OF SHAREHOLDERS WAS OVER 1.5 TRILLION, WHILE THE TA WAS SHOWING 703 BILLION. WHICH BY THE WAY WAS PREDOMINANTLY HELD BY INSIDERS.
IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by glassman: yeah legal, why should we trust anything anybody involved in this has to say....
UC definitely concealed the dilution as best he could... i want to have a fair market too...
but don't you think the NS issue will actually have to be a law-suit filed by the shareholders against their OWN brokers for not verifying the presence/delivery of the shares they bought?
isn't YOUR OWN broker who you pay to protect you?
GLASS I HAVE INFORMATION THAT THE NS ISSUE WILL BE HANDLED BY THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT, NOT THE SHAREHOLDERS.
IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by bill1352: legel my buy is ready if your sell is. when the SEC started this there was no mention of any company believed n/s. then after UC's new lawyers had a chance to look around & the cult started screaming all of a sudden UC is crying n/s chit. anybody call nevada to see if the a/s was just raised? sounds like a good time to print more shares if you ask me....lol
UC WAS TALKING ABOUT NS BACK IN '03. HE DIDN'T YELL ABOUT IT BECAUSE HE WAS BUSY SELLING SHARES INTO THE MARKET AND BUYING THEM BACK, AND INCREASING THE NS PROPORTIONATELY UNTIL NOW.
IP: Logged |
posted
UC WAS TALKING ABOUT NS BACK IN '03. HE DIDN'T YELL ABOUT IT BECAUSE HE WAS BUSY SELLING SHARES INTO THE MARKET AND BUYING THEM BACK, AND INCREASING THE NS PROPORTIONATELY UNTIL NOW.
sounds like market manipulation to me...
stripes look good on him?
still don't change the fact that he somehow circumvented all of the SEC filing rules to accomplish this "feat"... i have watched this from the time i first set eyes on Allstock...even before i officially signed in.... i've seen all the ridiculous claims and even wondered why some of the POSTERS didn't get picked up on blatant fraudulent statements... copied from other boards or not...
IP: Logged |
posted
legal wrote: "WOW, THAT'S GOOD WALLACE, YOU'VE ALREADY HEARD A LIVE BROADCAST THAT HASN'T OCCURED YET. BUT THANKS FOR THE PLUG"
Just where did I say I heard a live broadcast that has not yet occured? Again, you missed the point. SAME GROUPS/DIFFERENT NAMES - - ALL PUMPING THE CHIT OUT OF CMKX. It isn't necessary to hear the pump to know that it will be pumped....just name the person or group~!!~!!
legal, what in hell are you talking about below?:
"HE DIDN'T YELL ABOUT IT BECAUSE HE WAS BUSY SELLING SHARES INTO THE MARKET AND BUYING THEM BACK, AND INCREASING THE NS PROPORTIONATELY UNTIL NOW."
Any proof at all, even if it is an off the wall suggestion? Not even a little? Did UC or any insider tell you all about it?
IP: Logged |
quote:THE JUDGE LEFT THE QUESTION OF SUBPOENAS FOR NS INFO OPEN FOR THE HEARING. THESE TYPES OF MATTERS ARE ADDRESSED AT THE OPENING OF THAT HEARING.
I EXPECT CMKX TO IMMEDIATELY MOVE TO REVISIT THE QUESTION OF SUBPOENAS FOR NAKED SHORT, THEN LAYING THE SHARE STRUCTURE PROOF ON THE JUDGES DESK, AND DEMONSTRATING THAT CMKX COULD NOT HAVE TRUTHFULLY COMPLETED THEIR FILINGS KNOWING THAT THE NUMBER OF SHAREHOLDERS WAS OVER 1.5 TRILLION, WHILE THE TA WAS SHOWING 703 BILLION. WHICH BY THE WAY WAS PREDOMINANTLY HELD BY INSIDERS.
I've asked this before and have not received an answer so I'll try again. Why could they not have truthfully completed their filings? In essence what you are saying is that every company that has even an inkling that there might be a naked short position in their stock cannot truthfully file, correct? It's their responsibility to investigate it, come up with the short amount, and somehow incorporate it into their financials? Or do they just address it in the managments discussion section?
IP: Logged |
posted
Under SHO it is a criminal violation to knowingly furnish false or misleading information in a filing. I doubt that a "discrepancy" would be noticeable or even pursued by the SEC. But a trillion shares is a lot more than a discrepancy; and CMKX is not just any other company.
IP: Logged |
for not filing and selling illegal shares on the market when they were required to file that they were being issued. You just don't get it. NSS doesn't matter because they still could have filed. If you had trouble because of NSS then you state that but no excuse not to file. Especially the S-8 showing dilution.
quote:Originally posted by legaleagle: Shhhhhhh............listen...........can you hear it?
-------------------- Invest with your brain not with your heart.
IP: Logged |
posted
FLASH: YOU DOD NOT NEED TO BE A MEMBER OF THE CMKX OWNERS GROUP TO REPORT YOUR CMKX SHARE COUNT TO FRIZZLE'S GROUP FOR THE PURPOSE OF DOCUMENTING THE NUMBER OF SHARE HOLDERS AS WELL AS THE NUMBER OF SHARES
There seems to be a bit of misunderstanding as to who may send in numbers to Mr. Frizzell in an attempt to expose the shorters of our stock.
All shareholders may send in the account information to Mr. Frizzell as stated in the follwoing post. It does not require non-OG shareholders to join the OG or pay a fee.
The following link will expalin what to send to Mr. Frizzell. When in the site, click on the icon titled "Naked Short Fax Capmpaign."
John Martin asked me to post the following for him:
My previous e-mail and general press release to all shareholders regarding sending information to us with your account information, asked you to provided the CUSIP number of CMKX stock listed in your account(s).
Some Board Members have posted the correct CUSIP number for CMXK for all to just copy into the information to be sent to Mr. Frizzell rather than going into their own account(s) and copying ther CUSIP number from.
PLEASE DO NOT SEND US ANY OTHER CUSIP NUMBER THAN THE ONE LISTED IN YOUR ACCOUNT(S).
The reason for this is that not all CUSIP numbers are the same; any numbers differing from the official CUSIP number of 125809103 may be intentionally incorrect and may have been altered: such an incorrect number could lead to a broker or market maker messing with your stock; therefore, YOU MUST check your CUSIP number in your broker account to see if it differs from the above number. If it does, fax a note to Mr. Frizzell at nakedfax@cmkxownersgroup informing him of such. make sure you include your name, broker name, and date of your statement with the incorrect CUSIP number and a way to contact you.
IMPORTANT: If you are having difficulty in locating your CUSIP number and cannot locate it, this is okay: DO NOT LET THE LACK OF FINDING YOUR OWN CUSIP NUMBER STOP YOU FROM SENDING IN ALL YOUR OTHER INFORMATION.
If you do eventually locate your CUSIP number and it differs from this one 125809103, then let Mr. Frizzell know by fax as stated above.
IMPORTANT # 2: If you have already sent in your account information to Mr. Frizzell, and you discover the CUSIP number differs from the one above, please fax Mr. Frizzell at nakedfax@cmkxownersgroup.com and provide the information as listed above.
posted
This stupidity is getting ridiculous. This is so obvious of a scam. 704 billion has no excuse what so ever, I don't care what your reason is. They stopped filing for a reason and it wasn't NSS as they clearly stated in there first response. NSS wasn't even a issue until the shareholders got involved and UC hoped he found a scape goat out of this mess. This is a clear scam and I hope it ends soon because the chit is getting way to deep. I felt sorry for a few for getting sucked in but as the SEC will tell the judge the shareholders had 2 months to get out. We are protecting any future people from getting scammed into this crap.
-------------------- Invest with your brain not with your heart.
IP: Logged |
posted
You want to prove NSS then tell us the share structure. That would be a good start. But they refuse to do that yet they want everyone elses records. SCAM REVOKED
-------------------- Invest with your brain not with your heart.
IP: Logged |
posted
How much do you make per post? I am considering a job change.
quote:Originally posted by Ric: This stupidity is getting ridiculous. This is so obvious of a scam. 704 billion has no excuse what so ever, I don't care what your reason is. They stopped filing for a reason and it wasn't NSS as they clearly stated in there first response. NSS wasn't even a issue until the shareholders got involved and UC hoped he found a scape goat out of this mess. This is a clear scam and I hope it ends soon because the chit is getting way to deep. I felt sorry for a few for getting sucked in but as the SEC will tell the judge the shareholders had 2 months to get out. We are protecting any future people from getting scammed into this crap.
posted
Are you offering to pay me. It would be a easy job because it is what it is and anyone that would stop sipping on the koolaid for 5 minutes could see it to. 704 billion pump and dump.
-------------------- Invest with your brain not with your heart.
IP: Logged |
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
Printer-friendly view of this topic
