posted
Stock patrol publisher pleaded guilty to participating in a securities fraud before hs started Stock patrol in 1999. From the stock patrol website.
Hartley Bernstein, the founder and publisher of StockPatrol.com, is widely acknowledged as one of Wall Street’s leading watchdogs. Since July 1999, StockPatrol.com has provided an inside view of Wall Street, with detailed reports on public companies, brokerage firms, and regulatory developments. Its mission? To help investors navigate their way through the securities markets and the financial industry. Dozens of the companies and people that have been profiled on StockPatrol.com have subsequently been targets of regulatory proceedings, investigations and criminal prosecutions.
Prior to starting StockPatrol.com, Mr. Bernstein was a noted securities lawyer who represented dozens of public companies and brokerage firms. His clients included a group of brokerage firms that were involved in underwriting small, so-called emerging growth companies. To his regret, Mr. Bernstein became aware of certain aspects of his clients’ activities, and didn’t disclose those activities to securities regulators. As a result, Mr. Bernstein agreed to plead guilty to participating in a conspiracy to commit securities fraud, and was sentenced to probation. --------------------------------------------- As far as the dividend goes the percentages posted are for 483 Billion OS or if only 8% of the UCAD is being given that makes the OS about 40 Billion. I think the 483 Billion is the one most likely to be correct. The numbers work for either one and the possibility exists it is neither. --------------------------------------------- I do think this has a large naked short and rather than hear that there isn't every day and argue about it; I will state that we will know very soon when the dividends are given. That is a fact. Long and strong and ready to watch the fireworks. I plan on being available to watch the stock around the dividend and naked short cover time. Good night all, IMO-DD-Debi
Posts: 1188 | From: Clinton, MA 01510 | Registered: Jan 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
i doubt very seriously that UC has done anything illegal. so i wouldn't worry about that. this has been a very complicated set of shell games. the question really is...what's he doing? if the float really is 400 billion+ that means that CMKX should have taken in at least 25 million dollars( my calculator don't work with hundreds of billions)thru stock sales... this should be available to do a few things.... ( for the benefit of the doubt, i'm using only .0001/share and deducting expenses)
[This message has been edited by glassman (edited August 11, 2004).]
posted
Both the names are in that article. Anyway, at the end of the day its down to personal taste. Personally I would only give synthetic diamonds to a woman who had breast implants.
quote:Originally posted by Wallace#1: tic_toc
Re your earlier post about synthetic diamonds. I did spell Gemesis correctly. The other producer I checked out was Apollo Diamonds. Both companies seem to be calling them "cultured diamonds". From what I have read about the quality, unless marked by the producer as synthetic, they cannot be detected as such.
posted
Anyway I cant believe this 8% nonsense. its clutching at straws. until a PR is released stating the OS is less than calculated from the dividend figure, then I will go with 483b.
Posts: 768 | From: Ingland | Registered: May 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
If you are referring to me, I am just me! My husband is on this board, and has the best intentions at heart, and was called a basher! I also own this stock, but I like to be informed of the whole truth! I also believe in making my Christian brothers and sisters see when they may be off the correct path, because I love them! You understood the point the Lord wanted me to share with you! It proves to me, your love for HIM!
Posts: 622 | From: USA | Registered: Aug 2004
| IP: Logged |
finky4x2
unregistered
posted
Has anyone seen this? « Thread started on: Today at 01:47am »
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3DIntel releases The Naked Short Virus Scan(TM) 3DIntel has released a new patent pending program, The Naked Short Virus Scan, which enables US based public company’s to determine short position in their stock.
Austin, TX (PRWEB) August 5, 2004 -- 3DIntel has unveiled a new patent pending program, called The Naked Short Virus Scan, which enables US based public company’s to determine short position in their stock. The scan will identify in the size of short, date of occurrence, and the brokerage houses holding the short positions.
U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission regulations in the US prohibit the shorting of all but a relatively small number of stocks that are “marginable”, usually stocks that are traded on major stock exchanges. However, the practice of naked shorting OTC stocks by some broker-dealers has become a major factor in the falling price of some issues. Illegal shorting has been linked to various stock manipulation schemes, and the practice has come under increasing fire from ADP, DTC, CDS, the Berlin Exchange, as well as by various transfer agents.
3Dintel claims that its unique patent pending process can identify the share volume of illegal shorts, and identify the broker dealers originating these positions. Armed with this information, an issuer is enabled to pursue these nefarious actives in their shares. The details of the program are provided in a book published by 3DIntel, “Naked Short Selling: The Illegal Hacking of the U.S. Financial System” - By Alan Lomax.
posted
viruses are usually bad, but in this case, if it provides more transparency to the market--GOOD!!!!!!!!
link provides a site with a book for company officers to use ...... personally, i spent a lot of time this spring identifying stocks under .25$ that were vicitms of naked shorting (claims made by their PR and in these long lists that were circulated)--i did see some changes after the SEC made it clear that they were going to make this stick, but none of MY picks TOOK OFF like rockets.... and most of them dropped back down after awhile, indicating that interest waned anyway....yeah it exists, but you can't beat the MM's cuz they ARE the market and love'em or hate'em YOU NEED THEM.....
[This message has been edited by glassman (edited August 11, 2004).]
quote:Originally posted by Kate: If you are referring to me, I am just me! My husband is on this board, and has the best intentions at heart, and was called a basher! I also own this stock, but I like to be informed of the whole truth! I also believe in making my Christian brothers and sisters see when they may be off the correct path, because I love them! You understood the point the Lord wanted me to share with you! It proves to me, your love for HIM!
Hmm, Kate. Not sure I'm following you. Who were you referring to in your first sentence "If you were referring to me"? Maybe I missed something.
posted
here is another take on O/S but it will come out soon or when UC/R.Glenn want it to. That being said, let's all relax and wait.
By: pattreko0 11 Aug 2004, 01:01 AM EDT Msg. 62483 of 62551 Jump to msg. # ***O/S and Float (Adjusted)***
(This post wouldn't post properly so its a little messy)
Assumptions:
(1) The dividend ratio for UCAD shares is .0000155 (2) CMKX 8% dividend applies (3) Just the float receives the dividend (4) The CIM dividends are exempt from the 8% Rule
So, the wild guess is that there are 121,290,322,581 NSS in the float...
But, if we take the 160,000,000,000 from above and assume an average daily volume of 4,000,000,000 then the average volume per day would be...
Daily Volume as a % of Float = Average Daily Volume / Float = 4,000,000,000 /160,000,000,000 = .025 = 2.5%
A stock that trades 2.5% of the float each day is high, but I believe the MMs are creating artificial volume each day. If I were to believe anything in this whole post it would be what I just stated: MMs are creating artificial volume. By the way, keep in mind from above that the real float would be 38,709,677,419 and the float including NSS would be 160,000,000,000. For your information this post grows more speculative as it approaches the end, so be aware of that. These aren't necessarily my opinions, but make partial sense when considering certain assumptions...
posted
It's ok Brad! The person I was talking to, knows what I am saying. Not trying to be secretive, just trying not to hurt or embarrass anyone by saying names, or going into detail! I have been reading this board ever since buying the stock, but I don't feel qualified to get into the technical stuff. I appreciate everyones input though, and hope this stock does well!
Posts: 622 | From: USA | Registered: Aug 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
winsum HOLY SH*T!!! 1 bil + in 1 minute!!!! I for one « Thread started on: Today at 09:25am »
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- am going with major retirement of shares, or reduction of the NSS. Multiple 'signals' 100, 200, 500 went by then WHAMMM!!!! Massive volume goes through?
Posts: 2 | From: Noblesville, IN | Registered: Oct 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
today i am also seeing what was reported yesterday --high volume and low dollar values.....1billion +shares and 70K$ i have no opinion on why this would be...-- GOOD LUCK
Posts: 36378 | From: USA | Registered: Sep 2003
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by ali: here is another take on O/S but it will come out soon or when UC/R.Glenn want it to. That being said, let's all relax and wait.
By: pattreko0 11 Aug 2004, 01:01 AM EDT Msg. 62483 of 62551 Jump to msg. # ***O/S and Float (Adjusted)***
(This post wouldn't post properly so its a little messy)
Assumptions:
(1) The dividend ratio for UCAD shares is .0000155 (2) CMKX 8% dividend applies (3) Just the float receives the dividend (4) The CIM dividends are exempt from the 8% Rule
Once again we see someone (and I'm refering to the original poster patterkoO) trying to justifiy CMKX as having a small O/S. I think it's pretty clear from the recent PR's and OTC information that the O/S is at the 483 billion range and not the 40 billion as the poster claims.
There are at leat two flaws in the the assumptions. Assumption 1 is, I beleive, correct. 4 is irrelevent. As for assumption 2 I think it is quite clear from the UCAD dividend PR (http://biz.yahoo.com/bw/040718/185046_1.html) that all 7.5 million shares will be distributed. Finally, dividends are paid on shares O/S, NOT float. If you own shares, regardless if they are free trading or restricted, you are entitled to all dividends paid on those shares.
So live with it guys. The O/S is almost 500 billion. Sorry to see it, but we've got to face reality here.
posted
bluediamonds An Outline of the Casavant Maneuver? THE BIG PICT. « Thread started on: Today at 02:44:19 »
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- An Outline of the Casavant Maneuver? (THE BIG PICTURE)
" I don't admit to knowing all the intricacies of the plan, however, it no longer matters to me. I know what the puzzle will look like at the end (a lucrative tender offer after loads of cash and share dividends."
By: bill19336 10 Aug 2004, 05:58 PM EDT Msg. 62305 of 62357 Jump to msg. #
An outline of the Casavant Maneuver? ____________________
W H O is involved? ---Roger Glenn would say Urban's Union is a combination of friends, family, business associates and individual shareholders (includes UCAD, CIM, GEMM, ECPN, the JV's, etc.)
***I'd say it's Ed Dhonau, Rendal William, Rick Walker, Ron Casavant, BSIC, Rick Kusmirski, the Lundins and many other big money investors. ___________________
W H A T is it? ---Roger Glenn would probably say the Union is a multi-disciplined unofficial conglomerate built by using economies of scale and a unique blend of synergy. It is managed in a decentralized and horizontally integrated corporate structure that encourages and rewards entrepreneurship.
***I'd say it's a bunch of companies that manage themselves and help each other grow with Urban's assistance. ___________________
W H E R E is it happening? ---Roger Glenn would say we have strategic partnerships located throughout the world, with connections in the US, Canada, South America, Africa and China.
***I'd say we have a lot of deals all over the place. __________________
W H E N will it happen? ---Roger Glenn would say it's starts NOW
***I'd say 1989 to present ___________________
W H Y will it happen? ---Roger Glenn would say Urban wants to build and market the Casavant brand using a vertically integrated distribution strategy that takes control of the entire life cycle of a diamond. ---He'd also say UC wants to create a corporate tax strategy that will focus on the creation of living trusts for his heirs and allow a smooth transition to a professional management team (i.e., a new CEO, President, CFO, CTO, CIO, etc.). ---Roger would also state that Urban wants to leave the planet with the legacy of having helped the undercapitalized investor.
***I'd say Urban wants to help his family and the "little guy" by taking diamonds from the ground to the store shelf. __________________
In my opinion, what I have laid out above is the basic framework of Urban's plan. I don't admit to knowing all the intricacies of the plan, however, it no longer matters to me. I know what the puzzle will look like at the end (a lucrative tender offer after loads of cash and share dividends). Consequently, I really don't care about the order the individual pieces are put together in. All I know for sure is that we will all be very pleased with the end result of our holdings (i.e., diamonds, gold, silver, zinc, kimberlite fertilizer, potash, platinum and uranium).
Sometimes you need to step back and look at the "Big Picture".
posted
I guess nobody can never understand CMKX 100%. We don't have a PR for abt a week, billions of volume every day, we have a bad rumour regarding high O/S. The PPS won't go less than 0004. May be UC is selling the NS to MMs that he bought months ago for 0001. Just speculation.. Glassman what do you think.
Posts: 722 | From: Atlanta | Registered: Feb 2004
| IP: Logged |
Is the copy feature disabled on allstocks? It does get confusing when people reference another post indirectly. A few comments were totally lost. Even going back and trying to figure out who was referencing what, was difficult. I just tried to use the copy feature on my computer on two posts and couldn't. Tried again just now to fix this paragraph.
Gator and Noah -Interesting posts on the volume and subtraction. (I added to the buying volume).
Glassman -I remember you posting about naked short shares and they did well in the short term. My take on them going back down wasn't lack of interest but the continuation of naked shorting of some of those stocks.
As far as your reference to love em or hate em we need the MM's. Are you sure? Couldn't they be replaced by a computer? That would level the playing field to supply and demand. Assuming security was unhackable. That points out one of the biggest problems in the market. We can have all the rules in the world but as long as people are slimy there are going to be predators aiming for our wallets. I'm not sure what the answer to a level playing field would be. I think we all can see what it isn't.
I need to finish my taxes and should just log off as compelling as the market and message boards are. The August 15th deadline is looming large. GLTA-DD-IMO-Debi
Posts: 1188 | From: Clinton, MA 01510 | Registered: Jan 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
i don't think you are going to catch the MM's "NAKED" .... the shells may have been set up to force this issue, but once again, i say that we retatail stock buyers just aren't going to beat the MM's..... they aren't beating us--they are doing their job...UC raised cash to do BIZ... all of the outrageous claims may or may not be realised, but it takes YEARS to develop the kind of resources these guys hold--esp if they plan to get the diamond market "from top to bottom" in your hands... if you like this company hold... if you were looking for a get-rich quick plan, i bet you never heard that from UC...........
Posts: 36378 | From: USA | Registered: Sep 2003
| IP: Logged |
-------------------------- You all know what Citigroup, Urban and the rest of us who has any sense are waiting for...We are waiting for news from Glenns meeting...That's it, that's all. OS? LOL it would matter to any other company that WASN'T about to restructure into a new one like CMKX will. I don't want old share structure info about a company that will no longer exist in it's present manifestation.
I want to know the who, what, why, when and how we are being crafted into the NEW incarnation of CMKX. I believe that is what has BEEN crafted all of these months and now it's time to ink the deal. It's the only reason you have an attorney like Glenn to do a personal meet-and-greet. I believe it's all a formality at this point hence the familial-friendly atmosphere (rumor is Glenn brought the wife along)
So I wait, I watch all the new MMs log on and wait with them. They smell money and so do I. We will see money in the up coming DAYS (IMHO) no matter WHAT is said or not said on this board.
I have been in this play since 2002. I have no problem with waiting. I made nice bucks on the first bounce and I plan to make a crap load more on the BIG bounce to come.
Waiting is fun...waiting is good...especially if you know how to occupy your time. I don't care how much money one makes..heck I can ALWAYS make money...but not one billionaire or zillionaire living can buy back even ONE MISPENT SECOND of his life. Time isn't money...it's MORE than money...it's the most precious commodity you have because you spend it but there is no way in the world to earn it back..once its gone it's gone. So spend not one more second reading this post and go spend your time wisely....HEY! are you still here?......GET GOING!!!!!
Posts: 722 | From: Atlanta | Registered: Feb 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
getting rid of the MM's would be a NIGHTMARE for new investors... it would eventually destroy the markets because no new people would come in... the market would feed on itself... OK, maybe that's a little over the top...
it could work and is being developed, but IMO a lot of people will get hurt bad before they "get the hang of it"... the hacker issue is way over my head...
[This message has been edited by glassman (edited August 11, 2004).]
I like the positive attitude of the repost, but OS remains a major question regardless of the company metamorphosis. Whatever the flavor of the pie, we still need to know how many slices.
Posts: 2 | From: Noblesville, IN | Registered: Oct 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
speaking of electronic exchanges... i just heard that Archipelago is going public.....
Posts: 36378 | From: USA | Registered: Sep 2003
| IP: Logged |
posted
georgeburns Volume and a Cigar « Thread started on: Today at 11:00am »
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Wherever there is confusion there is profit.
Q: Who would sell?
1. CMKI hires Roger Glenn. 2. CMKI announces 3 stock dividends. 3. CMKI has moved drill to a new site in coordination with the joint venture (JV) partners. Site location based on Time Domain Electro-Magnetic (TDEM) survey and Goldak’s tri-maxial magnetic gradiometer. Results and drilling progress to be announced shortly. 4. A meeting this week. (Last meeting announced by UCAD in Nevada on 16 July resulted in 3 dividends and acquisition of additional mineral claims, acquisition of part of UCAD, and acquisition of 49 percent of Juinna Mining.) That was from one meeting. Supposedly today or last night is/was the new meeting.
A: Nobody in their right mind OR SOMEBODY WHO DOESN’T OR WON’T TAKE THE DIVIDEND.
Q: Who could that be?
Urban Casavant and company. Or The Market Makers Or Both
Q: Why would Urban be selling?
Theory: Urban bought billions at .0001. Roger Glenn warns Market Makers of future action. Agrees with Market Makers to sell them shares so they can cover. Urban selling at .0004 to Market Makers who either delete the shares and the CUSIPs or build a set of shares to sell off during the cover.
Q: How does Urban benefit from that? A: Urban reduces dilution, makes 400 percent profit, and raises capital for possible upcoming dividend. Reducing the Outstanding Shares (OS) has almost the same as effect as issuing a dividend in regards to raising the Price Per Share (PPS). Urban is flipping his own stock. Neat.
Posts: 2 | From: Noblesville, IN | Registered: Oct 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
OK Noah, that sounds good, why doesn't it have ANY references???? there are some problems tho.. like where did UC get enough money to float ALL of this at one time--i mean the racecar,th eacquisitions, the exploration costs, etc. etc. i don't know --that's why i'm asking
Posts: 36378 | From: USA | Registered: Sep 2003
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by glassman: OK Noah, that sounds good, why doesn't it have ANY references???? there are some problems tho.. like where did UC get enough money to float ALL of this at one time--i mean the racecar,th eacquisitions, the exploration costs, etc. etc. i don't know --that's why i'm asking
the cost of the shares alone at .0001 times 250,000,000,000 is gonna take some serious financing ....
posted
Posted by: zeninvestor32 In reply to: None Date:8/11/2004 10:32:32 AM Post #of 75053
EXCEPTION FOR MIDDAY POST
I just had to make a comment on this. Lee Webb from Stockwatch was posting on the RB board bashing CMKX last night. I have to say that I find this to be the most reprehensible compromise of journalistic integrity for a supposed financial journalist that I could imagine (outside of being PAID to do this which, who knows, may be happening). You already know my very, very low opinion and suspicions of Stockwatch but this is really revolting. Be on the lookout for any possible Stockwatch negative news article they may try to squeeze in before the next PR. When financial "journalists" show up to bash a .0004 stock, IMO I think you can pretty much outright dismiss any opinion or information from that rag.
And now back to our regularly scheduled programming ....
[Muzak to the tune of Bon Jovi's "You Give Love a Bad Name"]
Z
As always, these are my personal opinions.
Hopefully nobody in here is investing anything but "fun" money that they can afford to gamble with.
quote:Originally posted by glassman: OK Noah, that sounds good, why doesn't it have ANY references???? there are some problems tho.. like where did UC get enough money to float ALL of this at one time--i mean the racecar,th eacquisitions, the exploration costs, etc. etc. i don't know --that's why i'm asking
Glass, The first question items 1-4 have been referenced to death. These are all PR's.
2nd question is just logic. Why would anyone want to sell, in large volume, at this low pps, when there are dividends, major meeting in Sask, new drilling, (all PR'd).
The nearly obvious answer, is that only UC or the MM's would want to be selling now in large volume. MM's to cover. UC for the theorized reasons listed. Can't reference theory.
Posts: 2 | From: Noblesville, IN | Registered: Oct 2004
| IP: Logged |