The call sounded much like the one I had with Alana several months ago. Jenna asked much better questions though.
The thing that stuck out with my call and hasn't seemed to change is that the next step for anything to happen is for the company to get a lawyer. I read this like many others here that JA hasn't been working with the SEC. If he is working with them, it seems like it might only be on the basis of providing info against Rufus, not actually trying to get CSHD cleared. IMHO of course!
Posts: 1028 | From: Georgia | Registered: Jul 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
St. Matt ~ Great... Then in as civil tone as I can muster... next time you talk to him. Tell John to take those lawyers over to Atlanta and prove things to the SEC and the Federal Judge. Because there is alot more "letter of the law" to be followed according to the SEC Attourney.
And sorry but until that happens I can tell you what your last "FWIW" post is really worth...
PR's, Filings, Radio Interviews, rumors, hearsay, "I just heard's" and official tut comments on HSM are a joke until that happens and is on Pacer.
-------------------- Una Mas! Posts: 2717 | From: Eville,IN,USA | Registered: Feb 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
Honestly I don't care who is CEO at this point as long as they got a lawyer and can prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that they were legally voted in by a true majority of shareholders.
-------------------- Una Mas! Posts: 2717 | From: Eville,IN,USA | Registered: Feb 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
Well, judging by the comments Rufus was making on SPR im thinking MA and JA have had no intentions of settling anything in court. Ive been saying for over a week now that IMO JA has not been doing a whole lot about the problems at hand. Rufus made the comment that they should just go into court and state their case "Bawk! Bawk!". To ME that sounded like Rufus feels they are afraid to go into court. He WANTS them to go through the courts, i wonder why theyre not. Alana Blacks comments to Jenna almost appear to confirm just what Rufus was saying on SPR IMO.
So, instead of handling the courts (especially regarding who is the friggin CEO) JA is over in Europe working on some "mystery deal". I sure hope he isnt using company money (if any is left) to make this trip because no matter what kind of deal he makes over there it means NOTHING to us if he is not an officer of our company.
Im not trying to fit into a "camp" anymore either but those of you that bashed the crap out of Rufus for not handling the court case should be pretty disappointed in what Alana told Jenna today. Until i hear that John Arlitt and/or Michael Alexander walk their happy butts into that federal courthouse im gonna continue to wonder why not?
Posts: 2308 | From: Michigan | Registered: Jun 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
Is there anything in Euroclear which states the physical bonds may be withdrawn in person by the owners representative if needed for legal purposes? The SEC has no authority outside the US but if John is able to borrow the physical bonds, bring them back here, prove ownership to the SEC, and then return them to Euroclear...maybe that's what's going on?
I admit I know nothing about the bond process. I'm just speculating on additional reasons JA may be globetrotting.
Posts: 2498 | Registered: Mar 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
Really nice work Jenna. Direct questions with direct responses. Rufus should take lessons.
It's really difficult to figure out what motivates any of the players anymore. Arlitt and Rufus give the lip service that they're looking out for the shareholders, but their reckless, cryptic and secretive actions prove otherwise.
Posts: 949 | From: Little Rock, AR | Registered: Dec 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
Guys, I've been banned from HSM!!!!!! I didn't even do anything!!!! There wasn't even a reason.....WEIRD.....People asked me about the talk with Alana & I answered a few questions....nothing different than said here....What the heck???????
-------------------- ..just remember....Family is EVERYTHING!! Posts: 3944 | From: Rochester, NY | Registered: Sep 2006
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Jenna: Guys, I've been banned from HSM!!!!!! I didn't even do anything!!!! There wasn't even a reason.....WEIRD.....People asked me about the talk with Alana & I answered a few questions....nothing different than said here....What the heck???????
It's weird and makes me question the integrity of the HSM board, which I had a pretty low opinion of to begin with.
People get banned at allstocks for peculiar and unjust reasons too...
I suspect if you contest they'll reinstate you. I think the moderators at HSM are a little quick to react, generally speaking though. Not the greatest place for dialogue, particularly negative dialogue.
Posts: 949 | From: Little Rock, AR | Registered: Dec 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
But- someone pulled my interview post over there & I went to read it.....I said hi to a few people - they started to ask me about Alana & that was it....I didn't even say anything negative about anyone - that's the weird part....
-------------------- ..just remember....Family is EVERYTHING!! Posts: 3944 | From: Rochester, NY | Registered: Sep 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
Looks like from what I was reading? you might have gotten booted because you and St. Matt had admitted to speaking with Arlitt...and it seems that HSM will not let people post that may have "inside info"... that is just what I am thinking...
-------------------- #1 Rule: Protect your capital! #2 Rule: Never fall for the BS on the boards! Posts: 8890 | Registered: Jan 2006
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Jenna: But- someone pulled my interview post over there & I went to read it.....I said hi to a few people - they started to ask me about Alana & that was it....I didn't even say anything negative about anyone - that's the weird part....
I wouldn't worry too much about it. I will dirty myself and read a few pages there once in a while but stopped posting long ago. There are too many agendas there and they see enemies where there are none. If you had belonged to the right clique you would have been a herione. Just think you can save on water now, instead of showering everytime you throw pearls to the swine.
Some people worry about the fantasy in their mind more than actually using the grey matter to at least attempt to decipher the truth. As I've stated many times it lies somewhere between what Rufus is saying and what John, Mike and Dave are saying.
I do agree with CAT, if John, Mike and Dave were actually trying to move the company forward, the default in the court systems would have been the first, actually the second, order of business the first being HIRE an SEC Attorney. As far as John taking any money from the company, I don't think he has the access to it. I think the banking institutions would require a bit of documentation in order to release funds, more than stating I ws proclaimed the CEO.
If I remember correctly when the take over happened, the only Board members were Rufus and Romeo. Rufus stated he talked to Romeo in December, which would have been after the SHC's action. I still think that there are legalities involved here, if not, I believe Alana Black would not have had a problem stating who the CEO was. She stated that it depended on the bylaws of the corporation. Sounds like more legal fees that will end up comming out of the company coffers, that's if there is any money there to begin with.
GLTA Wally
Posts: 3255 | From: Los Angeles California | Registered: Jan 2006
| IP: Logged |
Quote: Originally Posted by padutch40 it's a shame.....some are here to get the board shut down....
BTW....love your posts
I could write you a book on the subject and we could even write a play about all these happenings. You wanna know the truth and nothing but the truth?? Yes some people on here want me to shut this thread down and you would be surprised who. Just connect the dots Look at who I ban , when and why of course you will never know. Much bigger than any of us and backed by big money . These are huge Corps who have a vested interest to shut it down. Like give me a break. A recorded break with Alanna Black of the SEC.Now people give your heads a shake and if you do not believe me, ask your lawyer what he/she/it policy is on posting of a confidential conversation on the dam internet. Wake up and think what this is all about. For god sake, now you know just one of the dozens of calls i have to make , why i ban and delete. Would you want your convesation with a lawyer posted on the Internet. ??No different than this so called friend Jenna posted. So stop asking stupid questions when it is common sence. That's it , I am outta here for the weekend
U been bad Jenna! Go sit in the corner!
-------------------- 'The rewards for those that persevere, far exceed the pain that must proceed the victory!' Posts: 399 | From: leeds, england | Registered: Jul 2006
| IP: Logged |
I missed Rufus mentioning Romeo but thats an interesting name to hear after all this time. Hes pretty much the only officer, past and present, that appears to have a totally clean slate. In fact, from what i can tell his slate is nearly non-existent.
If you look at various filings, in most cases there is a short blurb about what they have done and what their expertise is...but i dont recall one for Romeo.
Not only did they leave off his "blurb", he isnt listed as owning any "Restricted common shares", although the other officers have theirs listed.
I find the stuff with Romeo interesting because i recall a time when it was thought that maybe he could be in line for CEO. Since im having a rough time DDing him im not sure why it seemed like a good idea but i do recall something like that.
Posts: 2308 | From: Michigan | Registered: Jun 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
P.S. to Cat, You could have included that Romeo's name is not mentioned until pg.42 Or did I miss something else?
Posts: 360 | Registered: Aug 2006
| IP: Logged |
Quote: Originally Posted by padutch40 it's a shame.....some are here to get the board shut down....
BTW....love your posts
I could write you a book on the subject and we could even write a play about all these happenings. You wanna know the truth and nothing but the truth?? Yes some people on here want me to shut this thread down and you would be surprised who. Just connect the dots Look at who I ban , when and why of course you will never know. Much bigger than any of us and backed by big money . These are huge Corps who have a vested interest to shut it down. Like give me a break. A recorded break with Alanna Black of the SEC.Now people give your heads a shake and if you do not believe me, ask your lawyer what he/she/it policy is on posting of a confidential conversation on the dam internet. Wake up and think what this is all about. For god sake, now you know just one of the dozens of calls i have to make , why i ban and delete. Would you want your convesation with a lawyer posted on the Internet. ??No different than this so called friend Jenna posted. So stop asking stupid questions when it is common sence. That's it , I am outta here for the weekend
U been bad Jenna! Go sit in the corner!
LOL I am proud of you Jenna!!
Posts: 6410 | Registered: Jul 2006
| IP: Logged |
Surfer- That moderator is sooo dumb- Alana said she was telling me things that are public knowledge...anything she told me could be found in Pacers....
I guess I've been a BAD girl!!!
-------------------- ..just remember....Family is EVERYTHING!! Posts: 3944 | From: Rochester, NY | Registered: Sep 2006
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Ocqueoc: P.S. to Cat, You could have included that Romeo's name is not mentioned until pg.42 Or did I miss something else?
Youve lost me on that one
The link you brought up for Romeo not getting a "blurb" His name isn't mentioned until pg.42 and then again several pages down. Just teasing ya.I went thru all the pages!! As everyone knows by now, I'm just a crazy old lady!
Posts: 360 | Registered: Aug 2006
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Jenna: You go Momma Tell him!!!
Surfer- That moderator is sooo dumb- Alana said she was telling me things that are public knowledge...anything she told me could be found in Pacers....
I guess I've been a BAD girl!!!
Bad girl Jenna, go to your room!!!!
Posts: 360 | Registered: Aug 2006
| IP: Logged |
I find it intersting because the company we are all talking about is Conversion Solutions, a Delaware Corporation, The bylaws that pertain are under this corporation and not the bylaws of FHAL. Read the following from the 10K that was filed.
Section 8. RESIGNATIONAND REMOVAL: Any director may resign at any time by giving notice to another Board member ,the President or the Secretary of the corporation. Unless otherwise specified in such written notice, such resignation shall take effect upon receipt thereof by the Board or by such officer and the acceptance of such resignation shall not be necessary to make it effective. Any director may be removed with or without cause at any time by the affirmative vote of shareholders holding of record in the aggregate at least a majority of the outstanding shares of the corporation at a special meeting of the shareholders called for that purpose, and may be removed for cause by action of the Board.
No where does it state that a private meeting by the shareholders committee had this authority. It says a Special meeting of shareholders called for that purpose.
I believe what we have is Mike and John using the bylaws under Furia/FHAL and not CVSU. I did go over to HSM because of Jenna's getting banned to see what may have happened but never got to that point. Someone reposted Mike's post under the name of BODI. He states that he believes that the merger can be undone, well that means that at this time the merger is still in force.
this maybe legal technicalities but as they say the devil is in the details.
CAT, the reason you won't find much on Romeo is because he is in Europe, and I believe always has been.
GLTA Wally
Posts: 3255 | From: Los Angeles California | Registered: Jan 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
Dang Jenna...I didn't know you were one of the big Corps backed by big money. How about sharing a little of that with us .
Posts: 1028 | From: Georgia | Registered: Jul 2005
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Jenna: You go Momma Tell him!!!
Surfer- That moderator is sooo dumb- Alana said she was telling me things that are public knowledge...anything she told me could be found in Pacers....
I guess I've been a BAD girl!!!
You know what was really ironic? When going through the pages someone had posted the old I knos someone who knows something and it had to do with the SEC investigation JA. All innuendo but nothing happened to that post. No trouble no nothing. I guess getting information from a source that isn't anonymous is a nono but posting information that can never be corroborated is fine. Like I said Jenna, NOT TO WORRY. Anyway your mother took care of it and sent you to your room. Now spend sometime with your girls and leave the computer alone. Heck, if I had any semblence of a life I'd do it.
GLTA Wally
Posts: 3255 | From: Los Angeles California | Registered: Jan 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
So Mike is back over on HSM posting as Bodi? I've got some questions for him. Wonder if I'll be next to get booted ?
Posts: 1028 | From: Georgia | Registered: Jul 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
Tax, did you ever get the law firm's name that Simon brought up with Rufus?
Well, I listened to the interview yet again and pulled it out. I'm not sure of the spelling, but it sounded like Ballor (pronounced like valor as in uncommon valor). I looked it up under several spellings and found nothing. I tried to tie it in with Ribotsky and came up with nothing again. Simon said it was a high level law firm that had dealings with Cory Ribotsky.
Posts: 1028 | From: Georgia | Registered: Jul 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
Well, I can't say that I read all of the merger agreement, but I searched it pretty well. I can't find anything in there about Mike's preferred shares or what amount of shares he would end up with after the merger. I was pretty sure it was in there though.
The reason I started looking was due to this post I found on HSM
Bodi (mike alexander): I never gave up my preferred shares...Rufus offered to buy them in 100,000 million dollar blocks...there are other shareholders out there he promised $50.00 per share and up...within 6 months...I converted them prior to the 6-1 date...for obvious reasons...
Posts: 1028 | From: Georgia | Registered: Jul 2005
| IP: Logged |