I will say that after thinking about it a bit. I believe this investigation may be a necessary evil. SEC wants proof of the bonds. We have a CFO who is a known auditor and whistle blower, and third party auditor who has visible integrity, and is a published whistle blower, and a CEO that is so brutally honest that it scares the lawyers. Honestly if the bonds are not real I deserve to lose my investment. I think this will take a little while to prove but I am a betting man and I say the bonds will prove out to the SEC. When and if this stock starts trading again, I think it will do very well based on the green light granted by the SEC itself.
If it doesn't I am out my money, but better off because I didn't lose more. let's see what happens in the next 24 I think it could be exciting.
-------------------- Una Mas! Posts: 2717 | From: Eville,IN,USA | Registered: Feb 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
Rufus post on H S M: "Now we see who is left standing, take names and divide the spoils."
Posts: 559 | From: MN | Registered: Apr 2006
| IP: Logged |
Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Georgia Posts: 62 Now we see who is left standing, take names and divide the spoils. __________________ GODSPEED Rufus Paul Harris Chief Executive Officer Conversion Solutions Holdings Corp Harris*cshd.
-------------------- Never lookback... Posts: 896 | From: NY | Registered: Jul 2006
| IP: Logged |
Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Georgia Posts: 62 Now we see who is left standing, take names and divide the spoils. __________________ GODSPEED Rufus Paul Harris Chief Executive Officer Conversion Solutions Holdings Corp Harris*cshd.us
damn you Luv! I thought i was being quick about it!! LOL
Posts: 2308 | From: Michigan | Registered: Jun 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
Haha...hey ya'll Rufus just posted on HSM can someone copy and paste it?
Oh wait...30 of ya'll already did, lmao
So...when we all meet up for the camping on New2's compound...I've got a bunch of guns, some really groovy robes...and this kickass koolaid I've been wanting to try out...
Ya'll down?
[Razz]
Posts: 2024 | From: New Orleans, LA | Registered: Apr 2006
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by luvforever: All's well I can be fast but I'm lazy that's why I let you folks do the legwork! Didn't you say you were an engineer hehe
Yea, im an engineer. But today im moonlighting as a "refresher"
posted
Well, im headed out of the office so im going to miss whatever additional excitement might arise. Keep your heads up peeps, not over yet.
Posts: 2308 | From: Michigan | Registered: Jun 2006
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by TaxBack04: Not in over my head so I am not worried.
I will say that after thinking about it a bit. I believe this investigation may be a necessary evil. SEC wants proof of the bonds. We have a CFO who is a known auditor and whistle blower, and third party auditor who has visible integrity, and is a published whistle blower, and a CEO that is so brutally honest that it scares the lawyers. Honestly if the bonds are not real I deserve to lose my investment. I think this will take a little while to prove but I am a betting man and I say the bonds will prove out to the SEC. When and if this stock starts trading again, I think it will do very well based on the green light granted by the SEC itself.
If it doesn't I am out my money, but better off because I didn't lose more. let's see what happens in the next 24 I think it could be exciting.
This post pretty much sums up my feelings on this. I do believe it could take longer than 24 hours, that would be very fast.
Posts: 84 | Registered: Aug 2006
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by CRab: Haha...hey ya'll Rufus just posted on HSM can someone copy and paste it?
Oh wait...30 of ya'll already did, lmao
So...when we all meet up for the camping on New2's compound...I've got a bunch of guns, some really groovy robes...and this kickass koolaid I've been wanting to try out...
Ya'll down?
I am so there!
Posts: 1453 | From: Wisconsin | Registered: Jul 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
Is it mandatory for 10 days suspended trading or can it be resumed as soon as they have the info they need?
Posts: 869 | From: Az | Registered: Sep 2006
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Chartwalker: wow... Catia if "the jig is up" then why would Rufus post that?
Don't let us down Rufus!!!
Seems maybe its not eh? His confidence keeps my attention to say the very least.
One thing is for sure, i can leave the office today without worries of whether or not i need to sell!! LOL
Posts: 2308 | From: Michigan | Registered: Jun 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
In the SEC suspension letter it actually says the suspension is terminated at 11:59EST on November 6, 2006. Read the attached letter for the exact language of the suspension.
posted
Cat the SEC they do not issue any comments even after they finish their investigation. It would really suck if the SEC finds everything on the up and up and won't comment on anything.
quote:Originally posted by TimW: Is it mandatory for 10 days suspended trading or can it be resumed as soon as they have the info they need?
it will be AT LEAST 10 days. might as well try to chill out until then. right now it`s out of our hands. actualy it`s all out of our hands what ever happens!. good luck and keep your chin up!!
Posts: 2503 | From: connecticut | Registered: Mar 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
Hey Ryan...by allowing us to resume trading and not issuing an letter they would indeed be indirectly telling us something...just have to think about it that way...
The SEC will never admit to false accusations...thier way of doing that is to just act like nothing ever happened...
Posts: 2024 | From: New Orleans, LA | Registered: Apr 2006
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by CRab: Thanks Tex, I was just curious why this happened to be mentioned less than a day before it actually happened, lol...
well, I guess you could say I was off a day...anyway, two points simply for some more FYI: folks really need to make the distinction between an SEC suspension and a NASDAQ halt; the latter can be a good (as in price reset, time to digest news, etc), but the former never is a good thing; also, the fact that the PRs and bonds were all that were mentioned is not necessarily favorable, either. Why? Because the SEC can't suspend an issue again for the same reason...in other words, susbsequent suspensions *must* be for different reasons. Anyway, as someone has posted re the 211, for this trade again requires convincing an MM to meticulously go over "the books" and "sponsor" it, so to speak--that is, the MM would be "vouching" for them and taking on a huge responsibility.
Now, some *do* manage to trade somewhat on the greys once the suspension is ifted. Some here may remember that guy "DWE"? That stock he was so hot for (STTY? can't remember...something supposedly operating some security biz in China) traded pretty actively on the greys, for quite a while...
Anyway, good luck all and well done to those who flipped it for dough...Hope the rest aren't hurt too bad.