posted
Wasn't she under suspicion of killing him. Wasn't cleopatra also supposed to be married to her brother and actually be of greek decent. Yea the Egyptians had the North Carolinians beat there must of been a ton of bruncles around then.
posted
Interesting....this afternoon TDAmeritrade had some survey person call me to ask about my latest experience with customer service. I wasn't sure which experience they were referring to since I've had to call them so much in the past few weeks about PAVC and now CSHD. I made sure I answered most of their questions with "highly dissatisfied" and at the end they said I could make any comments. I said they should deliver shares to customers from splits in a more timely manner (I'm still waiting for my PAVC shares from August) and that they should stop shorting stocks.
This is the first time I've ever recieved a survey call from them.
Jo
-------------------- "Great Day for Up!"....Dr. Seuss
IP: Logged |
posted
I thought this **** entry would be timely because the SEC has recently taken steps to stop abuse of the rules of shorting. One of which is that you have to actually borrow shares before you can sell them. Some short sellers abused the process by giving sell orders to their brokers for stocks they don't own, or have not borrowed. The SEC decided to finally enforce the rule and make brokers confirm that the shares have been borrowed and delivered. Some short sellers don't like that this rule is being enforced.
posted
Mandatory Close-Outs of Threshold Securities.
Regulation SHO requires broker-dealers to close-out all failures to deliver that exist in threshold securities for thirteen consecutive settlement days by purchasing securities of like kind and quantity ("close-out").20
Until the position is closed out, the broker or dealer and any broker or dealer for which it clears transactions (for example, an introducing broker),21 may not effect further short sales in that threshold security without borrowing or entering into a bona fide agreement to borrow the security (known as a "pre-borrowing" requirement).
posted
Whether or not a security is a threshold security does not affect the Commission's ability to prosecute manipulative or fraudulent activity that may have occurred before or after adoption of Regulation SHO.
--this is from the same link...
Perhaps TDA is in more trouble then what we think?!!!
B. Short Sales in Threshold Securities — Rule 203(b)(3) 1. Threshold Securities
The Commission has decided to adopt, with certain modifications from what was proposed, additional requirements targeted at stocks that have a substantial amount of failures to deliver. As adopted, Rule 203(b)(3) requires any participant of a registered clearing agency ("participant")80 to take action on all failures to deliver that exist in such securities ten days after the normal settlement date, i.e., 13 consecutive settlement days.81 Specifically, the participant is required to close out the fail to deliver position by purchasing securities of like kind and quantity.
With slight modification from the proposal, a "threshold security" is defined in Rule 203(c)(6) as any equity security of an issuer that is registered under Section 12, or that is required to file reports pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act82 where, for five consecutive settlement days: there are aggregate fails to deliver at a registered clearing agency of 10,000 shares or more per security; that the level of fails is equal to at least one-half of one percent of the issuer's total shares outstanding; and the security is included on a list published by an SRO. 83 We believe this threshold characterizes situations where the ratio of unfulfilled delivery obligations at the clearing agency at which trades are settled represents a significant number of shares relative to the company's total shares outstanding. We believe that such circumstances warrant action designed to address potential negative effects.84 This narrowly targeted threshold will not burden the vast majority of securities where there are not similar concerns regarding settlement.85 Our OEA analyzed recent data from NSCC on fails to deliver and calculated that approximately 3.9% of all exchange-listed and Nasdaq securities, and 4.0% of all securities, would meet this threshold.
86In order to be deemed a threshold security, and thus subject to the restrictions of Rule 203(b)(3), a security must exceed the specified fail level for a period of five consecutive settlement days. Similarly, in order to be removed from the list of threshold securities, a security must not exceed the specified level of fails for a period of five consecutive settlement days. 87 This five-day requirement will address the potential situation where a security exceeds the fails level on one day, based on an aberrant fail to deliver that may not be indicative of the usual pattern of that particular security, and thus would prevent potential "flickering" of securities in and out of the list of threshold securities. 88 Rule 203(b)(3) is intended to address potential abuses that may occur with large, extended fails to deliver. 89 We believe that the five-day requirement will facilitate the identification of securities with extended fails.
As is currently the practice for Nasdaq securities that exceed the threshold designated in NASD Rule 11830, the pertinent SRO will be responsible for publishing a daily list of the threshold securities that are listed on their markets, or for which the SRO bears the primary surveillance responsibility. 90 The SROs derive the information necessary to calculate the list of threshold securities from data on fails to deliver currently received from NSCC.
yada yada... but in re: to market makers...
Therefore, while market makers (including options market makers) engaged in bona-fide market making will continue to be excepted from the locate requirement of Rule 203(b)(1), even when effecting short sales in threshold securities, we have decided at this time not to extend an exception to market makers from the requirements to close out fails to deliver in such securities that remain for thirteen consecutive settlement days. Moreover, as discussed previously, Rule 203(b)(3)(iii) provides that until the market maker, or the participant that clears for the market maker, takes action to close out any such fails to deliver that remain ten days after the normal settlement date, the market maker shall be unable to rely on the exception in Rule 203(b)(2)(iii) from the requirement to "borrow or arrange to borrow" for further short sales in such security.
We have, however, included a limited exception from the close out requirement to allow registered options market makers to sell short threshold securities in order to hedge options positions, or to adjust such hedges, if the options positions were created prior to the time that the underlying security became a threshold security. Any fails to deliver from short sales that are not effected to hedge pre-existing options positions, and that remain for thirteen consecutive settlement days, are subject to the mandatory close out requirement. We will, however, take into consideration information that shows that this provision operates significantly differently from our expectations.
"This stock has been on regulation SHO for 25 consecutive days and it has been confirmed that it has been "Shorted" by an objective "Third Party." To peruse this information please visit http://www.**********, they assert, "the 'Shorting' is over...16,000,000 shares with others estimating the 'Shorting' to be as high as 60,000,000."
CSHD CONVERSION SOL HLDGS
Short % Increase / Decrease 5377.98 %
Total Shares - Outstanding 62,489,721
From above link also:
"TD Ameritrade (and their subsidiaries) continue to sell shares they don't own, or have the ability to borrow. TD Ameritrade responds not by buying the stock out of the market, to cover their "Shorts," but by refusing their customers their legitimate right to buy more OTC Bulletin Board: CSHD stock. Some Conversion Solutions Holdings Inc. supporters have shared their thoughts and feelings on the forum http://www.**************.com, many of whom vow to press litigation against TD Ameritrade for not allowing them to purchase more CSHD stock."
So what's going on? Does TDAmeritrade have to cover those naked shorts or not?...
Posted by: abbytraderwin In reply to: None Date:9/15/2006 11:59:43 PM Post #of 75606
Did you guys not see the signals this time. Dimmy's first posts of the day. The return of Our-street and Serf said it all. By the way, I even got a threat via PM to see if I was looking to get banned again. I don't know if you guys can see my PM's but Matt should. I didn't get to see all of the fireworks today but expected it from Dimmy's posts. Sunday and Monday will be a hoot. Sunday night's Subpennyradio.com will be interesting I'm sure. Expecting basher takeover. Good thing he knows about Our-street and some of the things that have been going on with this stock.
I guess somebody found more fake DD. More to come. I guess they gave up on the bonds. I think GA is in stealth mode until this is done. I think the same for the real Dr. Mensah. I don't believe any of these people talked to him. I called that number the last time and my perceptions were not totally revealed in my post about the call. Hint, A very close relative spent his career as a GS Supergrade Engineer for the good ol USA in Washington, DC. Ex military and very well traveled and connected to the things that matter most to this country and that few will ever understand. I am seeing more and more of the pieces of this mystery fall into place. I fear this is much bigger than anybody on this board has begun to think. I also don't think the bashers and the money behind them have a clue what they are really dealing with. I'll stop before I go off. Anyway I trust Rufus and Team and I feel sorry for anyone who sold today. I understand if they had to. I hope they are not upset later.
If the bonds are real
If Rufus is honest and true
If the Fund and its PUBLICLY STATED United Nations CAUSE is true
If GA is real(not wether it is with AISS and CSHD)because with the bonds Rufus and Mensah could create any company they wanted to in a day or so, just paper you know. All is forgiven and they start again(If you every believed that they had a problem in the first place). I never bought into that crap anyway. If you had been waiting for a year for 10-20 million dollars, whould you choose now to knife Rufus in the back publicly when he is about to give you what you have wanted in a month or two? Well would you? You would have to believe that Dr. Mensah is of the same emotional disposition as Our-street, Dimmy, and Serfy, to attack Rufus at this time. Maybe that is why the companies and principles cannot be contacted. Is it really about to happen? Now?
BASHERS:
Did you get a corporate accountant to tell you that the bonds(that you first claimed did not exist and that CSHD did not have full rights to the use of them) cannot be booked as assets by CSHD? No you did not!!
Rufus is honest and true
The fund gave the bonds and you do not have clearance to investigate any further than that. Why? You tried, didn't you?
GA no person but a buffoon would think they are not real. Like GM, FORD, etc
If this is so, you have lost and can take a rest. It is over, repeat over. You are only scaring the children, stop it.
CSHD LONGER AND STRONGER STILL -- LET'S ROLL!!!!
IMO
Other board
-------------------- Disclaimer: Not accountable for anything I say
IP: Logged |
posted
Any fails to deliver from short sales that are not effected to
-->hedge pre-existing options positions,<--
and that remain for thirteen consecutive settlement days, are subject to the mandatory close out requirement. ==============================================
Frankly.. I think the SEC is just as crooked! They say no-no, but give big money a HUGE LOOP hole!
posted
I know im late on this one but It seems to be a good play, can you give a quick run down of whats going on with this stock. Also whats the expected short term and long term goals of the stock. Thanks
-------------------- This is the start of something big
IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by beatheodds: I know im late on this one but It seems to be a good play, can you give a quick run down of whats going on with this stock. Also whats the expected short term and long term goals of the stock. Thanks
short term $86.00 long term $200 this is a reverse merger and we are waiting on a 10K, we should have it by EOM. lots of DD, just follow the thread backwards, must be over 200 pages. GL
IP: Logged |
posted
no peaser, on a 10-k showing billions, by the end of month, how do you figure .40c , beattheodds, read through this DD an make an informed decision, and not some ones word that could possibly take a very good opportunity from you. be nice peas.
IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by beatheodds: I know im late on this one but It seems to be a good play, can you give a quick run down of whats going on with this stock. Also whats the expected short term and long term goals of the stock. Thanks
short term $86.00 long term $200 this is a reverse merger and we are waiting on a 10K, we should have it by EOM. lots of DD, just follow the thread backwards, must be over 200 pages. GL
quote:Originally posted by beatheodds: I know im late on this one but It seems to be a good play, can you give a quick run down of whats going on with this stock. Also whats the expected short term and long term goals of the stock. Thanks
short term $86.00 long term $200 this is a reverse merger and we are waiting on a 10K, we should have it by EOM. lots of DD, just follow the thread backwards, must be over 200 pages. GL
quote:Originally posted by beatheodds: I know im late on this one but It seems to be a good play, can you give a quick run down of whats going on with this stock. Also whats the expected short term and long term goals of the stock. Thanks
short term $86.00 long term $200 this is a reverse merger and we are waiting on a 10K, we should have it by EOM. lots of DD, just follow the thread backwards, must be over 200 pages. GL
$86 short term ?
LMAO
I Thou... it was $54 in the RESET
right after the 10k and sb-4
i am missing something here
dollar, new book price on last PR was 41.63, rufus price is book price x 2 86, 84 still very good, you did read the last pr did'nt you.
IP: Logged |
Topic Closed
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
Printer-friendly view of this topic
![[Big Grin]](biggrin.gif)
![[Smile]](smile.gif)
![[Wink]](wink.gif)
![[Eek!]](eek.gif)
![[Frown]](frown.gif)
