posted
SLJB's lawyer in Lebanon, Fasl Abu Zahr (Lawyer ID Number 9598)
Anyone find anything on this guy?
me either.
Great that steve is taking back over. His attention to his own company web site shows his dedication to improving confidence with shareholders and clients.
-------------------- All post are my opinion. Do your own DD. Who's clicking your buy/sell button!? Posts: 7800 | From: Virginia | Registered: May 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
I would have to agree we are going nowhere today. Nothing significant enough to make this move. Currently investors are cautiously watching what the management at Sulja is going to do. If there is nothing done to re-establish their confidence they will take the profits and sit on the sidelines until something is done.
Posts: 156 | Registered: Dec 2005
| IP: Logged |
for the Mods... Gee was pumping old news as if it were new. see above
old news eh?
WINDSOR, ON--(MARKET WIRE)--Jul 31, 2006 -- Sulja Brothers Building Supplies, Ltd. (Other OTC:SLJB.PK - News) announced today that the company is releasing financial information to its shareholders. Sulja Brothers Building Supplies earned $63,047,611.00 during the 12 months from June 1, 2005 to May 31, 2006. The company made $28,371,424.95 gross profit with a $26,023,991.63 in pre-tax profits. Net profits were $15,879,839.69. The monthly financials for 2005 and the pro forma for 2006 will shortly be available at www.suljabros.com.
Get it right stupid, it's called POSTING!! The only reason why I POSTED this is because I wanted to refresh the memory of those who may of forgot what the Audited Finanacials (when they are published) are going to look like.
I believe the audited numbers will be SIMILAR to these numbers, but of course I could be wrong.
Besides, what difference does it make, "pump" or post? It all looks the same to me as far as stock boards go. This whole board is full of "pumps", if that's how you want to look at it.
posted
Because of a posting they made back on December 6th I am concerned the financials will not be what we are expecting.
The Company also stated the following regarding the ongoing issue of providing current financial information to the public: "We will publish the numbers when we have them and when we know they are correct, exactly correct, beyond the slightest pause for doubt or debate of any sort...period."
Posts: 156 | Registered: Dec 2005
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by adwald: Because of a posting they made back on December 6th I am concerned the financials will not be what we are expecting.
The Company also stated the following regarding the ongoing issue of providing current financial information to the public: "We will publish the numbers when we have them and when we know they are correct, exactly correct, beyond the slightest pause for doubt or debate of any sort...period."
I know what you mean, it's hella confusing without a doubt, but I believe the company will be closing on some major deals in the coming days and weeks and will, eventually, publish the AF's that are going to surprise many of us, in a sensational way.
We had some great news yesterday and rumor has it, another PR is expected this week, should be interesting. I'm looking forward to the ride UP!
posted
At this point only the financials will produce the results we all are looking for. This needs to be accomplished and then we can move forward to other accomplishments for the company.
Posts: 156 | Registered: Dec 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
If the company wishes to re-establish credibility then the financials must come out regardless of their results. The unaudited financials mean nothing at this point in time.
My fear is they are not releasing them because they are way off from the unaudited financials and they are trying to ignore them until they can produce the results they were predicting.
So holding on to them makes them look worse than if they just released them. Or are they hoping to manipulate those numbers as well?
Posts: 156 | Registered: Dec 2005
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by GeeStreet: SLJB Financials!
Sulja Brothers Building Supplies, Ltd. (PINKSHEETS: SLJB) announced today that the company is releasing financial information to its shareholders. Sulja Brothers Building Supplies earned $63,047,611.00 during the 12 months from June 1, 2005 to May 31, 2006. The company made $28,371,424.95 gross profit with a $26,023,991.63 in pre-tax profits. Net profits were $15,879,839.69. The monthly financials for 2005 and the pro forma for 2006 will shortly be available at www.suljabros.com.
CEO Steve Sulja stated: "We had a good year in the latter part of 2005, thanks to our expansions in the Middle East. A large portion of 2005 profits and revenues can be attributed to our Middle Eastern Operations. We are expecting greater net profit performance in 2006."
A Red Sea Group spokesperson commented: "Sulja Brothers had an excellent year with major growth expected in the coming years. Our initial assessment to determine eligibility for Sulja Brothers to meet the NASDAQ requirements was based upon the current net profit of Sulja Bros."
NO DATE reference. GEE wizzzzz
-------------------- All post are my opinion. Do your own DD. Who's clicking your buy/sell button!? Posts: 7800 | From: Virginia | Registered: May 2006
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by adwald: Because of a posting they made back on December 6th I am concerned the financials will not be what we are expecting.
The Company also stated the following regarding the ongoing issue of providing current financial information to the public: "We will publish the numbers when we have them and when we know they are correct, exactly correct, beyond the slightest pause for doubt or debate of any sort...period."
I know what you mean, it's hella confusing without a doubt, but I believe the company will be closing on some major deals in the coming days and weeks and will, eventually, publish the AF's that are going to surprise many of us, in a sensational way.
We had some great news yesterday and rumor has it, another PR is expected this week, should be interesting. I'm looking forward to the ride UP!
JMO,
Gee
How can you say your not pumping???
What do you think this is called: I believe the company will be closing on some major deals in the coming daysand weeks and will, eventually, publish the AF's that are going to surprise many of us, in a sensational way.
Unless your an insider with some solid facts/proof, I'm going to have to agree with Boo and call it as I see it.
How do you know they will be closing on some major deals in the coming days? Why would you try to bilk these people out of more money than they've lost already by saying that if you have nothing to back it up?
Also, how do you know the financials will be sensational??? Have you seen them? Cuz if you have, tell us why they haven't been posted?
Hey, I'll give you the benefit of the doubt if you can prove otherwise, but let me just say that pumping, and posting from CANADA are not helping to convince me.
This crew here has " Been there, done that ".
-------------------- ~You aren't wealthy until you have something money can't buy.~ Posts: 3070 | From: CT | Registered: Apr 2006
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by GeeStreet: SLJB Financials!
Sulja Brothers Building Supplies, Ltd. (PINKSHEETS: SLJB) announced today that the company is releasing financial information to its shareholders. Sulja Brothers Building Supplies earned $63,047,611.00 during the 12 months from June 1, 2005 to May 31, 2006. The company made $28,371,424.95 gross profit with a $26,023,991.63 in pre-tax profits. Net profits were $15,879,839.69. The monthly financials for 2005 and the pro forma for 2006 will shortly be available at www.suljabros.com.
CEO Steve Sulja stated: "We had a good year in the latter part of 2005, thanks to our expansions in the Middle East. A large portion of 2005 profits and revenues can be attributed to our Middle Eastern Operations. We are expecting greater net profit performance in 2006."
A Red Sea Group spokesperson commented: "Sulja Brothers had an excellent year with major growth expected in the coming years. Our initial assessment to determine eligibility for Sulja Brothers to meet the NASDAQ requirements was based upon the current net profit of Sulja Bros."
NO DATE reference. GEE wizzzzz
That's how I found it. I can't recall where I found this particlaur release without the date, but I did notice that the date was missing, so don't jump to conclusions now Mr. Big Shot.
Obviously I know that most people have probably seen this PR, no biggie.
quote:Originally posted by Wit: This crew here has " Been there, done that ".
Brushing some of the salt off my left shoulder for good luck!
-------------------- All post are my opinion. Do your own DD. Who's clicking your buy/sell button!? Posts: 7800 | From: Virginia | Registered: May 2006
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by adwald: If the company wishes to re-establish credibility then the financials must come out regardless of their results. The unaudited financials mean nothing at this point in time.
My fear is they are not releasing them because they are way off from the unaudited financials and they are trying to ignore them until they can produce the results they were predicting.
So holding on to them makes them look worse than if they just released them. Or are they hoping to manipulate those numbers as well?
You got that right adwaid,.."mean nothing at this time".
And, I'm betting that your fears are right, they are wayyyy off. That's precisely the reason we haven't seen them. They wanted to con, and the auditor's couldn't fudge them enough to satisfy them, or us,....lets see what they're going to pull out of their A$$ now.
And Gee,....if you attack this post,...I'll know it's personal, and that's your stake.
-------------------- ~You aren't wealthy until you have something money can't buy.~ Posts: 3070 | From: CT | Registered: Apr 2006
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by GeeStreet: That's how I found it. I can't recall where I found this particlaur release without the date, but I did notice that the date was missing, so don't jump to conclusions now Mr. Big Shot.
Obviously I know that most people have probably seen this PR, no biggie.
Gee Gee
Just something that misleading sends everyone bugeyed looking for verification. better to do the DD and find out where it came from before you post it eh?
-------------------- All post are my opinion. Do your own DD. Who's clicking your buy/sell button!? Posts: 7800 | From: Virginia | Registered: May 2006
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by adwald: Because of a posting they made back on December 6th I am concerned the financials will not be what we are expecting.
The Company also stated the following regarding the ongoing issue of providing current financial information to the public: "We will publish the numbers when we have them and when we know they are correct, exactly correct, beyond the slightest pause for doubt or debate of any sort...period."
I know what you mean, it's hella confusing without a doubt, but I believe the company will be closing on some major deals in the coming days and weeks and will, eventually, publish the AF's that are going to surprise many of us, in a sensational way.
We had some great news yesterday and rumor has it, another PR is expected this week, should be interesting. I'm looking forward to the ride UP!
JMO,
Gee
How can you say your not pumping???
What do you think this is called: I believe the company will be closing on some major deals in the coming daysand weeks and will, eventually, publish the AF's that are going to surprise many of us, in a sensational way.
Unless your an insider with some solid facts/proof, I'm going to have to agree with Boo and call it as I see it.
How do you know they will be closing on some major deals in the coming days? Why would you try to bilk these people out of more money than they've lost already by saying that if you have nothing to back it up?
Also, how do you know the financials will be sensational??? Have you seen them? Cuz if you have, tell us why they haven't been posted?
Hey, I'll give you the benefit of the doubt if you can prove otherwise, but let me just say that pumping, and posting from CANADA are not helping to convince me.
This crew here has " Been there, done that ".
All IMO. We all have a right to post our opinions and I believe ALL is well in regards to SLJB. If you did your DD, you will understand what I am trying to say. Check out the IHUB/SLJB board for more info, some very intelligent folks on that board.
I post what I believe from doing many hours of reserach on the company. If your stupid and you invest based on my opinion, then you shouldn't be investing. If your smart, then you will do your own research and invest on your own opinion.
Sulja Bros. is in the business of building materials and are aggressively seeking deals in the ME. You should know this by now, if you have done your research. The company is now beginning to confirm these deals. We just had a PR yesterday about a successful deal for 25,200,000 tonnes of cement in the ME. Much more to come.
I don't know who you folks think you are, but I will post as much as I feel like posting, so whatever you are trying to prove is not gonna make a difference.
posted
Let me guess, this is the "crew" who bought at $0.1, $0.2, sold for a big loss and are now bashing SLJB? Most likely.
Most of what people type on stock boards is pure speculation. You are NOT in the know, just as much as I am NOT in the know. Fair enough?
I am relieved that a meaty PR was published yesterday and I am anticipating many more to come.
I base my opinions on what I read in PR's and from what I find doing background research. You bashers can dwell on the AF's all you want, but this is a non-reporting pinksheet stock, they don't need to publish the AF's. Are you rookies really that surprised that the AF's have not been published yet? LOL, c'mon, get a grip.
Well, first off, in none of your posts did you ever write IMO (In my opinion), therefore causing speculation as to whether or not you had some inside information. You need to really add that to the end of your posts, as to not intentionally cause a stir of questions.
I don't think that anyone who is posting here is dumb enough to invest one anyone's speculation (as you mentioned), however, there are some gullible people as we've all seen through this last con run and you need to be careful about what you say and how you say it.
As for the cement deal, and how you mention after that "There's more to come", you really need to write IMO after that, unless you know for a fact.
Lastly, "as for who we think we are",... we're a great bunch here of intelligent, savvy investors, many which have been burned here by this company already, some worse than others, and we have nothing to prove as we are not directly involved with the company.
They are the ones who need to prove something.
-------------------- ~You aren't wealthy until you have something money can't buy.~ Posts: 3070 | From: CT | Registered: Apr 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
Gee - I am boodog on IHUB as well. and have been talking to a couple from there. As for there being intelligent folks there - well - I'm sure they're are. everyone has their own opinions and all should feel free to share. my only point to you was you posted referencing financials and when someone asked you where they came from you ignored them. no i'm not a bigshot. i am a newB still and will be for some time - maybe a year or 2. still learning. I do my own DD. all these message boards add to the DD for any play - not to stand alone but to be verified. your post gave no link for verification to help those looking. take it FWIW.
-------------------- All post are my opinion. Do your own DD. Who's clicking your buy/sell button!? Posts: 7800 | From: Virginia | Registered: May 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
I would agree that Sulja is a good company with lots of potential I am just concerned about the way it is being managed and whether they are truly concerned about their investors.
Enron was a good company as well but management ran it into the ground.
Investors, especially in panny stocks, are very cautious and if a company states it is or will do something then they must follow through. Penny stocks is where they prove themselves and lack thereof can be disastrous as they attempt to both move into the bigger boards as well as attempt to aquire financing as they attempt to grow.
It is the responsibility of the management to maintain an image which instills confidence in the investor, banks, etc. If they cannot do that then they must find someone capable of doing this.
Posts: 156 | Registered: Dec 2005
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by GeeStreet: Let me guess, this is the "crew" who bought at $0.1, $0.2, sold for a big loss and are now bashing SLJB? Most likely.
Most of what people type on stock boards is pure speculation. You are NOT in the know, just as much as I am NOT in the know. Fair enough?
I am relieved that a meaty PR was published yesterday and I am anticipating many more to come.
I base my opinions on what I read in PR's and from what I find doing background research. You bashers can dwell on the AF's all you want, but this is a non-reporting pinksheet stock, they don't need to publish the AF's. Are you rookies really that surprised that the AF's have not been published yet? LOL, c'mon, get a grip.
If I'm a "pumper", then you are bashers.
Sound good?
Gee
Nope,....bought in since early LFWK days,...and don't try to turn this around as to convince some we are bashers, those that have been here through thick & thin, know who's bashing & who's not, so that won't work.
And frankly, I have bashed this company in the past, and now, with very good reason, it's been a POS thus far.
If they want that named removed, they'll have to work hard to remove it.
-------------------- ~You aren't wealthy until you have something money can't buy.~ Posts: 3070 | From: CT | Registered: Apr 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
These are all good points that you guys make and I appreciate the responses.
I apologize for not responding to some of the questions, but I don't post all the time and I don't read all the posts. I will try to be as specific as I possibly can when posting, as I try to do, but a lot of what I type is just my opinion based on my own research. Hopefully you guys can understand that.
You seem like an intelligent group, I just don't appreciate being slammed when all I am doing is posting my opinion and attempting to help build some positive energy after the unfortunate dive in PPS.
The puzzle seems to be coming together slowly, but surely.
quote:Originally posted by adwald: I would agree that Sulja is a good company with lots of potential I am just concerned about the way it is being managed and whether they are truly concerned about their investors.
Enron was a good company as well but management ran it into the ground.
Investors, especially in panny stocks, are very cautious and if a company states it is or will do something then they must follow through. Penny stocks is where they prove themselves and lack thereof can be disastrous as they attempt to both move into the bigger boards as well as attempt to aquire financing as they attempt to grow.
It is the responsibility of the management to maintain an image which instills confidence in the investor, banks, etc. If they cannot do that then they must find someone capable of doing this.
Concerned about their investors??? Ummmm,...I'm thinking NO!
They're deep pockets are all that they've been concerned with so far. Look how they $crewed us so far, with all of their lies, delays and fake pr's.
They better have a better plan to take this one back up, and stop relying on their hometown pumpers to do the job.
-------------------- ~You aren't wealthy until you have something money can't buy.~ Posts: 3070 | From: CT | Registered: Apr 2006
| IP: Logged |
-------------------- All post are my opinion. Do your own DD. Who's clicking your buy/sell button!? Posts: 7800 | From: Virginia | Registered: May 2006
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by adwald: Investors, especially in panny stocks, are very cautious and if a company states it is or will do something then they must follow through. Penny stocks is where they prove themselves and lack thereof can be disastrous as they attempt to both move into the bigger boards as well as attempt to aquire financing as they attempt to grow.
It is the responsibility of the management to maintain an image which instills confidence in the investor, banks, etc. If they cannot do that then they must find someone capable of doing this.
This part is on point IMO. Cheers
-------------------- All post are my opinion. Do your own DD. Who's clicking your buy/sell button!? Posts: 7800 | From: Virginia | Registered: May 2006
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by adwald: I would agree that Sulja is a good company with lots of potential I am just concerned about the way it is being managed and whether they are truly concerned about their investors.
Enron was a good company as well but management ran it into the ground.
Investors, especially in panny stocks, are very cautious and if a company states it is or will do something then they must follow through. Penny stocks is where they prove themselves and lack thereof can be disastrous as they attempt to both move into the bigger boards as well as attempt to aquire financing as they attempt to grow.
It is the responsibility of the management to maintain an image which instills confidence in the investor, banks, etc. If they cannot do that then they must find someone capable of doing this.
Concerned about their investors??? Ummmm,...I'm thinking NO!
They're deep pockets are all that they've been concerned with so far. Look how they $crewed us so far, with all of their lies, delays and fake pr's.
They better have a better plan to take this one back up, and stop relying on their hometown pumpers to do the job.
"Lies, delays and fake PR's"?
I would be careful with what YOU say buddy, this is all speculation. You don't know if the company "lied" or just could not close on some deals that they thought they would. Naturally, sh*t happens sometimes. Things don't go as smooth as we want all of the time, but we certainly don't know if the company flat out "lied".
I agree that the company has obviously delayed the AF's numerous times, which is very frusterating, but the company does business all over the globe, do they not? My guess is, the completing and publishing of SLJB's AF's are a little more complicated perhaps? Obviosuly, you want the AF's to be as accurate as possible when publicly announcing them.
As far as your comment about "fake PR's", this makes no sense. I know you got "had" buying at the top and sold for a huge loss, but let's think clearly here.
You don't seem to have much info to back your statements up, it's pure speculation. Whining about the past isn't going to make anything better. The key is, the company is moving forward and IMO, nothing has changed since the drop in PPS. The company is continuing to move ahead with their plans.
"SLJB Assures Shareholders That Tall-Order Distribution Contracts Remain a Viable Focus of the Company."
Why sell now? What has changed? Not much if anything, if you really think about it.
You know what,.I threw the bait out there and you just grabbed it as I knew you would. Care to share why your so defensive of this company? I already know now, seeing that your posting from Canada and all.
Look at you defending them,....hmmm, it's like you have a personal stake in this or something, but I'm not seeing as an investor.
As for "being had",....nope, I scored right along with Petar, and you, and all the other insiders.
How's that ole saying go?...something like, "fool me once, shame on me, fool me twice, shame on you".
I think you would be best suited for the ihub board,...tell your boss, there's no more suckers left here. That's unless of course, your not already "the boss".
-------------------- ~You aren't wealthy until you have something money can't buy.~ Posts: 3070 | From: CT | Registered: Apr 2006
| IP: Logged |
You know what,.I threw the bait out there and you just grabbed it as I knew you would. Care to share why your so defensive of this company? I already know now, seeing that your posting from Canada and all.
Look at you defending them,....hmmm, it's like you have a personal stake in this or something, but I'm not seeing as an investor.
As for "being had",....nope, I scored right along with Petar, and you and all the other insiders. Your not gonna get me this time around either,..LOL.
How's that ole saying go?...something like, "fool me once, shame on me, fool me twice, shame on you".
I think you would be best suited for the ihub board,...tell your boss, there's no more suckers left here. That's unless of course, your not already "the boss".
That would be: "Fool me once, shame on you! Fool me twice, shame on me!"
I am just a big believer of the company, nothing more, nothing less.
quote:Originally posted by adwald: I would agree that Sulja is a good company with lots of potential I am just concerned about the way it is being managed and whether they are truly concerned about their investors.
Enron was a good company as well but management ran it into the ground.
Investors, especially in panny stocks, are very cautious and if a company states it is or will do something then they must follow through. Penny stocks is where they prove themselves and lack thereof can be disastrous as they attempt to both move into the bigger boards as well as attempt to aquire financing as they attempt to grow.
It is the responsibility of the management to maintain an image which instills confidence in the investor, banks, etc. If they cannot do that then they must find someone capable of doing this.
Concerned about their investors??? Ummmm,...I'm thinking NO!
They're deep pockets are all that they've been concerned with so far. Look how they $crewed us so far, with all of their lies, delays and fake pr's.
They better have a better plan to take this one back up, and stop relying on their hometown pumpers to do the job.
"Lies, delays and fake PR's"?
I would be careful with what YOU say buddy, this is all speculation. You don't know if the company "lied" or just could not close on some deals that they thought they would. Naturally, sh*t happens sometimes. Things don't go as smooth as we want all of the time, but we certainly don't know if the company flat out "lied".
I agree that the company has obviously delayed the AF's numerous times, which is very frusterating, but the company does business all over the globe, do they not? My guess is, the completing and publishing of SLJB's AF's are a little more complicated perhaps? Obviosuly, you want the AF's to be as accurate as possible when publicly announcing them.
As far as your comment about "fake PR's", this makes no sense. I know you got "had" buying at the top and sold for a huge loss, but let's think clearly here.
You don't seem to have much info to back your statements up, it's pure speculation. Whining about the past isn't going to make anything better. The key is, the company is moving forward and IMO, nothing has changed since the drop in PPS, so why sell now? Why not stay positive? Honestly, what has changed? Not much if anything, if you really think about it.
Gee
Wow. Not into brainwashing here... please refer to the PR's saying when the AF's would be posted. And then the excuses. That in itself is cause for law suits which i believe are already being filed. The game of manipulation is a pinky play, and no I wasn't caught by it. Not sure where your evidence that ANY of the overseas operations are legit. If YOU are a believer that's fine. And if YOU have the proof from a verifiable source overseas or even in canada that can verify that any of the "global" ops are for real I would certainly like to hear about it. And not from overseas family members - they are insiders.
-------------------- All post are my opinion. Do your own DD. Who's clicking your buy/sell button!? Posts: 7800 | From: Virginia | Registered: May 2006
| IP: Logged |
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
Printer-friendly view of this topic
![[Big Grin]](biggrin.gif)
![[Wink]](wink.gif)
![[Razz]](tongue.gif)
