posted
HERES THE KEY LINE, Expect,IMO CEO Steve Sulja stated: "The State of Nevada has received the assets. The balance sheet has been sent to our auditor and we expect to have the audited financials completed in mid-September
-------------------- LIFE IS 10% HOW YOU MAKE IT AND 90% HOW YOU TAKE IT! Posts: 9276 | From: San Diego CA | Registered: Jul 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
The bottom line with this one is the audited financials. So many pinks say they will have audited financials and then uplist to OTCBB, but almost none follow through. The company usually just continues to delay and delay it. If a audit by PWC comes out on time and the numbers match up with what Sulja stated, this stock all of a sudden becomes extremely legitimate to many investors, and I think it will truly explode
-------------------- Disclaimer: Not accountable for anything I say Posts: 6266 | Registered: Jun 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
They have been right on the money with everything they said so far.
Plus, when they mention KPMG and Price Waterhouse Coopers in the PR's, their credibility is on the line. too
Posts: 2321 | Registered: Aug 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
WINDSOR, ON, Sep 06, 2006 (MARKET WIRE via COMTEX) -- Sulja Bros. Building Supplies, Ltd. (PINKSHEETS: SLJB) announced today that a new CEO has been hired.
A company spokesperson stated: "We have offered the CEO position to Mr. Shahid Khan, a prominent attorney in Ontario, Canada. With the new CEO on board, the contracts he was involved with will be announced. Mr. Shahid Khan has been functioning as a bridge between our North American suppliers and Middle Eastern Contractors. Mr. Shahid Khan has been the facilitator of many contracts in the Middle East."
This contains forward-looking information within the meaning of The Private Securities Litigation Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements may be identified through the use of words such as "expects," "will," "anticipates," "estimates," "believes," or statements indicating certain actions: "may," "could," "should" or "might occur." Such forward-looking statements involve certain risks and uncertainties. The actual result may differ materially from such forward-looking statements. The company does not undertake to publicly update or revise its forward-looking statements even if experience or future changes make it clear that any projected results (expressed or implied) will not be realized.
Posts: 121 | From: TX | Registered: Aug 2006
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by IMAKEMONEY: "we expect, LMAO, Starting to sound like QBID-CMKX-PLNI and on and on.
That's like comparing apples and oranges. SLJB has been anouncing huge deals all along, and has been acurate about everything and are keeping all the shareholders well informed. SLJB is making truck loads of money.
They have been right on the money with everything they said so far.
Plus, when they mention KPMG and Price Waterhouse Coopers in the PR's, their credibility is on the line. too
There's no doubt in my mind the financials will be out by end of the monh.
Posts: 2321 | Registered: Aug 2006
| IP: Logged |
WINDSOR, ON -- (MARKET WIRE) -- 09/06/06 -- Sulja Bros. Building Supplies, Ltd. (PINKSHEETS: SLJB) announced today that a new CEO has been hired.
A company spokesperson stated: "We have offered the CEO position to Mr.Shahid Khan, a prominent attorney in Ontario, Canada. With the new CEO onboard, the contracts he was involved with will be announced. Mr. ShahidKhan has been functioning as a bridge between our North American suppliersand Middle Eastern Contractors. Mr. Shahid Khan has been the facilitatorof many contracts in the Middle East."
This contains forward-looking information within the meaning of The PrivateSecurities Litigation Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements may beidentified through the use of words such as "expects," "will,""anticipates," "estimates," "believes," or statements indicating certainactions: "may," "could," "should" or "might occur." Such forward-lookingstatements involve certain risks and uncertainties. The actual result maydiffer materially from such forward-looking statements. The company doesnot undertake to publicly update or revise its forward-looking statementseven if experience or future changes make it clear that any projectedresults (expressed or implied) will not be realized.
Posts: 2321 | Registered: Aug 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
I would have to say I agree with, at the very least, the issue of credibility using Price Waterhouse Coopers and KPMG in updates. Both of those companies could squash Sulja like a bug if their names were in any way tarnished by something in a PR.
-------------------- Study before you buy, Sell before you think about it.... Posts: 3903 | From: Gulf Coast | Registered: Jun 2006
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by SherriT: I would have to say I agree with, at the very least, the issue of credibility using Price Waterhouse Coopers and KPMG. Both of those companies could squash Sulja like a bug if their names were in any way tarnished by something in a PR.
There names weren't tarnished, there would no reason for either company to come after sulja
-------------------- Disclaimer: Not accountable for anything I say Posts: 6266 | Registered: Jun 2004
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by SherriT: I would have to say I agree with, at the very least, the issue of credibility using Price Waterhouse Coopers and KPMG. Both of those companies could squash Sulja like a bug if their names were in any way tarnished by something in a PR.
There names weren't tarnished, there would no reason for either company to come after sulja
No, I agree with you...should have posted the quote from above. IF Sulja were using their names about releasing financials, and Sulja were implicated in some kind of scam, you can bet those two accounting firms would handle Sulja like a gnat in the wind. Point being, Sulja would be careful about their choice of words if there was any reason the financials would not be coming in the near future.
-------------------- Study before you buy, Sell before you think about it.... Posts: 3903 | From: Gulf Coast | Registered: Jun 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
Well we already have a contract for $350 million announced yesterday and today says there are more to be announced! Another $350 million making it a total of $700 million??? That is what the pro forma says before the cement contract!! No wonder they were confident in a NASDAQ LISTING!!! They knew all along!!!!!
Posts: 2321 | Registered: Aug 2006
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Ace of Spades: This is Awesome
"Mr. Shahid Khan has been functioning as a bridge between our North American suppliers and Middle Eastern Contractors."
"Mr. Shahid Khan has been the facilitator of many contracts in the Middle East."
Yep, Steve Sulja likely is protecting his own investment in his company by handing the reigns over to the man bringing in the big stuff overseas...
Just a curiousity question (and I apologize if this has been batted around earlier)...assuming we see the audited financials in a timely manner as good or better than what Sulja stated, what price are you guessing we will see in the run to follow? (Just pure speculation...)
-------------------- Study before you buy, Sell before you think about it.... Posts: 3903 | From: Gulf Coast | Registered: Jun 2006
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Ace of Spades: Well we already have a contract for $350 million announced yesterday and today says there are more to be announced! Another $350 million making it a total of $700 million??? That is what the pro forma says before the cement contract!! No wonder they were confident in a NASDAQ LISTING!!! They knew all along!!!!!
Shouldnt the stock be up on news like that, not down? Not bashing btw, just asking.
Posts: 854 | From: Alpharetta, GA | Registered: Mar 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
Steve could still be President etc., this does not mean he is out........Hang on, this may be a bumpy ride...
Posts: 63 | From: Idaho | Registered: Jul 2006
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Ace of Spades: Well we already have a contract for $350 million announced yesterday and today says there are more to be announced! Another $350 million making it a total of $700 million??? That is what the pro forma says before the cement contract!! No wonder they were confident in a NASDAQ LISTING!!! They knew all along!!!!!
Shouldnt the stock be up on news like that, not down? Not bashing btw, just asking.
I must admit only 20% gain on yesterday's news really makes me wonder.
-------------------- Disclaimer: Not accountable for anything I say Posts: 6266 | Registered: Jun 2004
| IP: Logged |
Topic Closed
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
Printer-friendly view of this topic
![[Smile]](smile.gif)
![[Big Grin]](biggrin.gif)
