posted
Jon, I believe it was this board, but someone posted some pictures of their new offices, including inside shots. You might want to dig a bit in this thread.
IP: Logged |
posted
"quote: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Get a PR out on Business Wire, not Market Wire. I don't think your newsletter is gonna do squat as you can see the market markers are taking your share price down like they want to. Get some great news out on the wires. Follow the monthy report with a pr...the market markers will never know what hit them as well as sellers. Everyone was waiting for some type of news with a big corp. or a utility. Use Business Wire as you PR source as the ne you are using now only gets to about 40% of investors and you are not getting the other 60% investors and possibly utility co. to see your FCC Certified product and software. Did you know your PR you put out on Jan 31st on Market Wire missed those 60% investors?? Imagine if you put it on Business Wire where you stock price would be now and then you would not have to sell as many shares as you have already to keep your co. afloat. Do some better marketing and you'll see a better return and once again you shoould not have to sell so many shares as your price will be higher. A shareholder. M.N.
quote: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- You got your wish...hang tight:) I am going to get to the bottom of the PR Co....I'm sending your email to our rep...."
And why wasn't today's PR put out on Business Wire?
IP: Logged |
posted
This was GREAT NEWS! The information submitted would have to be in responce to an (RFI) request for information by their UDC which happens to be Southern Cal Electric! That is the second in a three step process for contracts. The final being the actaul contract Award! With this technoligy saving 48% in overall costs... This is HUGE. The doors are finally opening!
VALENCIA, CA -- (MARKET WIRE) -- 03/08/2006 -- ConectiSys Corporation (OTC BB: CNES), a developer of automatic meter reading technologies, announced today that its automatic meter reading Case Study has been submitted for review to its Local Utility Distribution Company (UDC) and other related industry concerns.
A recent request for information from the Company's local UDC is expected to reveal that the use of the Company's H-Net™ automatic meter reading system exceeds the net present value of manual monthly meter reading systems. The Company believes that its research has demonstrated that, on average, single manual monthly meter reading costs are nearly twice that of the costs of the Company's H-Net™ automatic meter reading system for streaming time of use data (STOUD) of 2,880 meter reads during a standard monthly reporting period
IP: Logged |
A PR stating that the costs of the H-Net technology and it's associated costs being 48%, as stated in MR, being submitted to the local UDC (which is SCE)is news. The AMR case study, which many of you hopefully read (attached to the MR), releases the CNES porice structure. As I stated before , if a utilites budget of $127,000,000 is reduced by 48% which is $67,000,000 budget now, why would that not be perceived as significant? SCE's budget is in the billions, so the savings are even more. You can find SCE's financial statements online. When the CEC and the CPUC understand the cost savings impact of this pricing structure, and the energy saving made possible through Demand Response, with the involvement of the consumer through increased awareness by availability of data on the internet, why would the CEC and the CPUC, or any nation wide PUC not stand up and take notice?
What do you think Itron and Cellnet think when they see the major cost savings associated with CNES technology compared to their technology, and if you have researched the pricing structures of those companies, you will se that they are significantly higher, Why would this not be percieved as positive or significant?
What do you think the meter manufactures, GE, Sensus, Landis and Gyr will think? Maybe they would want to get on board with CNES more than they are now, if they can get their meters into the CNES agreements?
These levels of cost savings could very well get the attention of Canada, which has and is installing all Time of Use, and now they can get Real Time for a fraction of the costs?
I don't get it... nothing earth shattering
This is all speculation on my part, but I do not understand why this is perceived as "nothing earth shattering...
IP: Logged |
posted
I have a question...discussion...confused here...
I have seen rumors all over the blogs concerning mergers and partnerships...We all have seen those...here's my dilema that's got me wondering...
Why would CNES put ALLLLLLLLLL this effort into denying the GE rumor? They covered their arse in the MR...why not call it a day...Why put that in todays PR...????
IP: Logged |
posted
Yeah Bear, and in today's PR there was a bit of a contradiction when they said it was company policy to neither deny or confirm rumors... then they denied this particular one. Hmmmmm
IP: Logged |
posted
I think there is something to the GE rumor. They are denying it too strenuously. If CNES didn't start the rumor, and I'm sure they didn't, why would they need to cover their back side? What are the mechanics of a merger or partnership? I'm grasping at straws here but would GE have to pay off CNES shareholders at some point? Or would it be a share swap so to speak where x amount of shares of CNES=Y amount of shares in GE? In short: what happens to CNES shares if GE mergers, buys out etc.?
These four or five guys with big bucks on Wall Street see this PR and start calling each other saying...hey have you seen this GE thing with this outfit out of California? Hell, I just read the numbers and they are in with this big utility in Calfornia...The one's with all those brown outs over there...yah, SCE, that's the one...These damn savings nubers look good...
Hell, why don't we put in a few hundred grand each and buy at market and see what happens...the old ladies only gonna blow the money shopping for Jewlry anyway and my big board stocks are doing sheet right now...
IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Johnwayne: I think there is something to the GE rumor. They are denying it too strenuously. If CNES didn't start the rumor, and I'm sure they didn't, why would they need to cover their back side? What are the mechanics of a merger or partnership? I'm grasping at straws here but would GE have to pay off CNES shareholders at some point? Or would it be a share swap so to speak where x amount of shares of CNES=Y amount of shares in GE? In short: what happens to CNES shares if GE mergers, buys out etc.?
This is very true Johnwayne! I have seen companies deny rumors many times before and they end up being true. During RFI and RFP processes there is to be no public disclosure of such events. I work for the city and see this happen all the time. So it could very well be that they are in the middle of the negotiation process with GE.
IP: Logged |
posted
Ok I am kinda new can someone please tell me what gives? tens of millions of shares bought no sells in 20 min yet price doesnt go up? TIA
IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Stock Jockey: From TransAm on the RB board:
A PR stating that the costs of the H-Net technology and it's associated costs being 48%, as stated in MR, being submitted to the local UDC (which is SCE)is news. The AMR case study, which many of you hopefully read (attached to the MR), releases the CNES porice structure. As I stated before , if a utilites budget of $127,000,000 is reduced by 48% which is $67,000,000 budget now, why would that not be perceived as significant? SCE's budget is in the billions, so the savings are even more. You can find SCE's financial statements online. When the CEC and the CPUC understand the cost savings impact of this pricing structure, and the energy saving made possible through Demand Response, with the involvement of the consumer through increased awareness by availability of data on the internet, why would the CEC and the CPUC, or any nation wide PUC not stand up and take notice?
What do you think Itron and Cellnet think when they see the major cost savings associated with CNES technology compared to their technology, and if you have researched the pricing structures of those companies, you will se that they are significantly higher, Why would this not be percieved as positive or significant?
What do you think the meter manufactures, GE, Sensus, Landis and Gyr will think? Maybe they would want to get on board with CNES more than they are now, if they can get their meters into the CNES agreements?
These levels of cost savings could very well get the attention of Canada, which has and is installing all Time of Use, and now they can get Real Time for a fraction of the costs?
I don't get it... nothing earth shattering
This is all speculation on my part, but I do not understand why this is perceived as "nothing earth shattering...
its a reduction in cost, not their overall budget! save all the salaries of the people that have to go out and read the meters, not 48 of
IP: Logged |
posted
Yeah thanks Bearclaw - I just wanted to see if we had a good support base of buyers here. I know we have people all the way up to .0027 so I wanted to get a view. Thanks again.
posted
I think we're getting close Bearclaw....LOT of buying going on at these levels. Somebody is using ARCA to hold this in place while the buying continues IMO.
IP: Logged |
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
Printer-friendly view of this topic
