posted
iternity. Do you are you thinking this is going to be a string of pr's released in the near future? Now what do you think a good pps will be in the near future
posted
i hold for middle cent area. i think a lot more to come - this is just the beginning and we will see 1 cent fast now.
Posts: 779 | Registered: Jan 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
That is my plan too...have a ton of this...and figure I can live off the interest of a million $$ for a while...wow... .86...we should see close to a cent at closing...
-------------------- I teach in the middle of a cornfield-Do your own DD and don't base your investments on my opinions Posts: 599 | From: AmishLand, PA | Registered: Jan 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
Universal Express Signs New Dubai Agreement
Universal Express Inc. USXP, has today signed a new investment and advisory contract with Navstar for the creation of a joint venture and a new Mideastern publicly traded company utilizing Luggage Express services throughout the Gulf and surrounding countries.
-------------------- corn oil comes from corn, olive oil from olives, where does baby oil come from? Posts: 441 | From: Vulcan | Registered: Feb 2006
| IP: Logged |
"This unique partnership in the Middle East involves multiple influential leaders and supporters in the region," said Richard Altomare, CEO and Chairman of Universal Express, Inc.
"Today we have signed a 40,000,000 USD guarantee with an expected 200,000,000 USD initial investment into our joint venture company," continued Mr. Altomare.
-------------------- corn oil comes from corn, olive oil from olives, where does baby oil come from? Posts: 441 | From: Vulcan | Registered: Feb 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
I am still in from .0006. Added to my position at .0026 as well. Thinking about picking some more up if it pulls back in the .0060's, maybe low .0070's. Sold half of my position at .0064.
[ February 22, 2006, 16:12: Message edited by: Money ]
Posts: 1638 | From: Up North | Registered: Jan 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
Wow, i just read the PR about Dubai. This is big. Now it makes sense why the stock went up the past 2 days. I think this will keep growing.
Posts: 1128 | From: Houston, TX | Registered: Feb 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
Do you all believe this will be slide back down to the 60-70 range or is it a good time to get back in now?
Posts: 711 | Registered: Feb 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
Coalition for Luggage Security Calls for Public Attention to $172 Cost Per Lost Suitcase
NEW YORK, Feb 22, 2006 (BUSINESS WIRE) -- The Coalition for Luggage Security today calls for an immediate solution to luggage security and lost luggage as reported by ABCNews.com. The Air Transport Association, claim the airlines today have less control over baggage handling. The TSA is responsible for airport security and ensuring luggage is sufficiently checked for threats to airlines and passengers. http://abcnews.go.com/Travel/story?id=1632907&page=1
According to Universal Express' press release on February 17, 2006 concerning lost luggage and solutions to help eliminate this problem, over 3.5 million bags have been lost in 2005. This is the worst performance by airlines since 1990. The U.S. Department of Transportation says, among the reasons for these losses are: a surge in the number of passengers, airline budget cuts, backed-up flights and tighter inspections of luggage.
"Last year in a time when all airlines and their employees should be focusing on the bottom line, something as simple as a lost bag cost an airline $172, according to a CNNMoney report. However, combining that cost with the fact that airlines lost 3.5 million bags last year means that this supposed insignificant item cost the airlines $619 million dollars," said Richard A. Altomare, Founder and Chairman of the Coalition for Luggage Security, and CEO of Universal Express, Inc. (OTCBB: USXP) CNN Money: http://money.cnn.com/2006/02/17/news/companies/airline_passenger_ problems/ (Due to its length, this URL may need to be copied/pasted into your Internet browser's address field. Remove the extra space if one exists.)
"Present Security efforts have become cumbersome. This is a problem that can not be corrected by adding more and more conveyor belts, security personnel and crippling airline financial losses," said Harvey Abelson, Coalition Director.
"We cannot solve this challenge by simply throwing money at the same repetitive actions. Separating luggage from passenger aircraft is the only solution as indicated in our white paper (http://www.usxp.com/securitywp.pdf) We're calling for an immediate solution to this disturbing and potentially deadly practice of revamping, not re-thinking. More conveyors, more cameras, more wands, and more personnel are proving only to be an ineffective and disorganized practice. Airlines should take the first step and begin offering passengers new options and alternatives for safety and revenue purposes. If you give American's the chance they will take luggage out of the travel equation, and will ensure safer and more practical means of flying safely without fear, debt and confusion," concluded Mr. Altomare.
About The Coalition for Luggage Security
The Coalition for Luggage Security was established to ensure the safety of travelers through alternate means of luggage transportation. The Coalition consists of prominent businesspersons and companies that educate the public, Congress and the Administration on the importance of solving the luggage and cargo safety issues that exist in airlines and airports.
Safe Harbor Statement under the Private securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995: The statements contained herein, which are not historical, are forward-looking statements that are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in the forward-looking statements including, but not limited to, certain delays beyond the Company's control with respect to market acceptance of new technologies, products and services, delays in testing and evaluation of products and services, and other risks detailed from time to time in the Company's filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
posted
I think it really depends on how much this dubai deal makes believers out of current and future investors. I am in this stock for the possible merger with Airnet systems. A company that trades on Amex for over $3.00 dollars a share. I know that a couple of weeks ago, this stock went to .0080. Then a few days later it went back into the .0020's where I bought more. I won't buy in this high, a pull back will happen with non-believers selling for quick profits.
Posts: 1638 | From: Up North | Registered: Jan 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
Well I won't sell anytime soon. I will buy more with a pull back of .0015 or more.
Posts: 1638 | From: Up North | Registered: Jan 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
I can't believe it. Back on Feb. 1st this stock was only at .0014/.0015. I am actually talking about buying more in the low .0070's now (if it pulls back).
Posts: 1638 | From: Up North | Registered: Jan 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
There are going to try their best to shake people out really hard. They don't want to have to buy up in the pennies to cover!
Posts: 1638 | From: Up North | Registered: Jan 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
yes, but at some point, with that ammount of buys (in dollars!) they have to. before the move to AMEX (if ANS works for USXP) they must cover.
Posts: 779 | Registered: Jan 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
The idea of separating luggage from airline passengers is a non starter from the git-go. Think about the logistics and increased cost of aircraft/crews/fuel.
Altomare may have something up his sleeve, but I hope it's better than the blimps and bus-trucks.
-------------------- Making it a little at a time....Now is the time to determine if you are a man or a mouse. Posts: 1543 | From: Ogilvie, MN, US | Registered: Apr 2004
| IP: Logged |