posted
ya my bad. i lost tons of money in ckei...that is why i got out. well that is a learning experience....haha have fun guys. i will look for the drop
Posts: 338 | From: oregon | Registered: Jan 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
well if not then my bad luck. i still have +200 this week. happy with that. not a great week but oki still green
Posts: 338 | From: oregon | Registered: Jan 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
i see no REAL resistance. MMs will shake, of course. but they have to cover 20 billion nss shares IMHO. why are we up 2000% in 3 weeks. think. we have no real news and a monster O/S (as of 12/2005)
Posts: 779 | Registered: Jan 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
Yea, I sitting on an extra $5000 plus profit. It is tempting to take some more off the table. I took half off yesterday at .0064.
Posts: 1638 | From: Up North | Registered: Jan 2006
| IP: Logged |
Press Release Source: Coalition for Luggage Security
Coalition for Luggage Security Calls for Public Attention to $172 Cost Per Lost Suitcase Wednesday February 22, 11:02 am ET
NEW YORK--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Feb. 22, 2006--The Coalition for Luggage Security today calls for an immediate solution to luggage security and lost luggage as reported by ABCNews.com. The Air Transport Association, claim the airlines today have less control over baggage handling. The TSA is responsible for airport security and ensuring luggage is sufficiently checked for threats to airlines and passengers. http://abcnews.go.com/Travel/story?id=1632907&page=1 ADVERTISEMENT
According to Universal Express' press release on February 17, 2006 concerning lost luggage and solutions to help eliminate this problem, over 3.5 million bags have been lost in 2005. This is the worst performance by airlines since 1990. The U.S. Department of Transportation says, among the reasons for these losses are: a surge in the number of passengers, airline budget cuts, backed-up flights and tighter inspections of luggage.
"Last year in a time when all airlines and their employees should be focusing on the bottom line, something as simple as a lost bag cost an airline $172, according to a CNNMoney report. However, combining that cost with the fact that airlines lost 3.5 million bags last year means that this supposed insignificant item cost the airlines $619 million dollars," said Richard A. Altomare, Founder and Chairman of the Coalition for Luggage Security, and CEO of Universal Express, Inc. (OTCBB: USXP - News).
"Present Security efforts have become cumbersome. This is a problem that can not be corrected by adding more and more conveyor belts, security personnel and crippling airline financial losses," said Harvey Abelson, Coalition Director.
"We cannot solve this challenge by simply throwing money at the same repetitive actions. Separating luggage from passenger aircraft is the only solution as indicated in our white paper (http://www.usxp.com/securitywp.pdf). We're calling for an immediate solution to this disturbing and potentially deadly practice of revamping, not re-thinking. More conveyors, more cameras, more wands, and more personnel are proving only to be an ineffective and disorganized practice. Airlines should take the first step and begin offering passengers new options and alternatives for safety and revenue purposes. If you give American's the chance they will take luggage out of the travel equation, and will ensure safer and more practical means of flying safely without fear, debt and confusion," concluded Mr. Altomare.
About The Coalition for Luggage Security
The Coalition for Luggage Security was established to ensure the safety of travelers through alternate means of luggage transportation. The Coalition consists of prominent businesspersons and companies that educate the public, Congress and the Administration on the importance of solving the luggage and cargo safety issues that exist in airlines and airports.
Safe Harbor Statement under the Private securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995: The statements contained herein, which are not historical, are forward-looking statements that are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in the forward-looking statements including, but not limited to, certain delays beyond the Company's control with respect to market acceptance of new technologies, products and services, delays in testing and evaluation of products and services, and other risks detailed from time to time in the Company's filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
posted
The shake will be very hard when the mm's decide they had enough. It will go back up though. Maybe not today, but in the days or weeks to come.
Posts: 1638 | From: Up North | Registered: Jan 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
I don't think it is going to hold it up in the .0080's. If you got in the stock in the .0050's or higher, you might think about taking something off the table.
Posts: 1638 | From: Up North | Registered: Jan 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
I am not out. I have been in this for a long ride. I know how the USXP roller coaster works. I took half off yesterday. I will ride the rest until I hear some ANS news.
Posts: 1638 | From: Up North | Registered: Jan 2006
| IP: Logged |