posted
I sent an email to Richard Brown last week about financials. He answered back the very next day. He just said that he has been trying with Frank...
IP: Logged |
posted
This B*llSH*T going on at this board is really discouraging. The posters that are bashing are those who have put in more $ than they should have invested in a pinksheet co. They lost more than they could afford. Now they are trying for all else to lose hope too. Is this a risk in micropenny land.(of course) But if what we hope to be true does in fact be true,will we be rewarded.....hell yeah and handsomeling,I might add. The only thing here is hearsay and that's why we're at this level. I may be optimistic,thats how successful people become rich.......they are risktakers and don't quit until they succeed. Frank is one of those people.It takes money to make money. Most people on this thread have gone against the rules and have actually become investors in a pink . What is an investor?someone who puts money into a co. in hopes that the co. will grow with their investment. To me.....the investment i made a couple years ago was a good one....only problem is I sold my shares to someone else. I see this as an opportunity for me to get in at the very very bottom of a successful Co. that is wayyyyy undervalued due to uncertainty. The one thing I am certain about is the Co has been getting subs.If they weren't they wouldn't have been able to get any other carriers other than RCN. We are NOW UP To FIVE CaRRIERS! There is no doubt in my mind that the Co. will be well known within the next couple years. The biggest uncertainty is the stock.....if there was less uncertainty we wouldn't be on the pinks ,would we?And That's not fun and exciting is it? I'm here because of the possibilities not probabilities and with possibilities comes great reward.I'm not here for a 100% gain, I'm here for the possibilty of a life changing occurance.And for minimum risk. We all know how many shares we can buy at these levels and where this pps. could go with some promisses coming true, just a little late. I'm here to stay.....call me stupid,naive or what haveya......GLTA
40 million and still growing........
-------------------- EVERY Day ABOVE GROUND is a GREAT DAY!!!
IP: Logged |
posted
Great timing. Hopefully, you answer some of the claims here.
quote:Originally posted by Jennifercd10: Hi everyone Well, we sure live in interesting times. I'm out of town and computerless so I'm at the library. Just a couple of points or so.
The 150 markets Q must be in for the Gay Games has been satisfied by Q unscrambling its signal thus allowing any network to rebroadcast it, although a royalty would have to be paid. The Gay Games will thus be available nationwide.
This board is expending a huge amount of energy. If we could focus just 10% as a united effort at Frank requesting meaningful financials we very probably would get them. I talked with Richard Brown and he said that a meaningful financials page on the web is what he has been pushing Frank for. He also said that our effort would go a long way to helping him get it! Lets focus on what we want and at who we can get it from! Frank does listen when it is done in mass. If it is done respectfully, but firmly, Frank will read them. Lets work together.
quote:Originally posted by Ligge: MT, I believe you are grasping at straws, possibly due to garbage someone else has given you. The unknown comment refers to the fact that you are calling someone out yet you dont say who so that makes them unknown.
If you had any real proof I find it very hard to believe that you would stay quiet (thats not in your nature it seems) since proof would protect you from any libelous or slander accusations. The only proof you are hoping to get is an admission from someone here.
Thank you, obviously your wrong about my "seeming nature" because here ya go Ligge.
Ask JenniferCD10 what the CD stands for
You still didnt do anything but imply that there is something nefarious in relation to Jennifer's name. If you are trying to imply that she is the insider and you have tangible proof of that accusation you can share then say spit it out. If not, I would drop it.
IP: Logged |
posted
Isn't it called fair analysis when trying to determine why a stock has tanked? This isn't a minor drop in pps, this an absurd plundering of value directly from investors pockets. I don't think it qualifies for confidence today.
-------------------- Just the facts, ma'am.
IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by MillerTIME: Jennifer i truely am sorry for doing it, but many people were pissing me off saying that i was a liar and just on a witchunt.
If your pissed at me i understand, again im sorry.
Why would you call her out, tell everyone she's a liar and an insider manipulating the boards, and then apologize in the next breath?
posted February 07, 2006 02:53 PM -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I OWN MANY MILLIONS OF SHARES, DUSTOFF IS SOMEONE I TRUST, I WANTED TO SEE IF I COULD SELL, WENT RIGHT THREW 1 MILLION 9 SHARES AT .0001, SO SELL IF YOU WANT TO ARE SHUT UP AND RIDE, JUST SO YOU ALL KNOW I PUT A SELL AT .0002 FOR 1 MILLION 7 SHARES AT .0002 LETS SEE. HOLDING ALL THE REST FOR NOW.
-------------------- Kick me and i will Kick you back.
IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by one2watchny: This B*llSH*T going on at this board is really discouraging. The posters that are bashing are those who have put in more $ than they should have invested in a pinksheet co. They lost more than they could afford. Now they are trying for all else to lose hope too. Is this a risk in micropenny land.(of course) But if what we hope to be true does in fact be true,will we be rewarded.....hell yeah and handsomeling,I might add. The only thing here is hearsay and that's why we're at this level. I may be optimistic,thats how successful people become rich.......they are risktakers and don't quit until they succeed. Frank is one of those people.It takes money to make money. Most people on this thread have gone against the rules and have actually become investors in a pink . What is an investor?someone who puts money into a co. in hopes that the co. will grow with their investment. To me.....the investment i made a couple years ago was a good one....only problem is I sold my shares to someone else. I see this as an opportunity for me to get in at the very very bottom of a successful Co. that is wayyyyy undervalued due to uncertainty. The one thing I am certain about is the Co has been getting subs.If they weren't they wouldn't have been able to get any other carriers other than RCN. We are NOW UP To FIVE CaRRIERS! There is no doubt in my mind that the Co. will be well known within the next couple years. The biggest uncertainty is the stock.....if there was less uncertainty we wouldn't be on the pinks ,would we?And That's not fun and exciting is it? I'm here because of the possibilities not probabilities and with possibilities comes great reward.I'm not here for a 100% gain, I'm here for the possibilty of a life changing occurance.And for minimum risk. We all know how many shares we can buy at these levels and where this pps. could go with some promisses coming true, just a little late. I'm here to stay.....call me stupid,naive or what haveya......GLTA
40 million and still growing........
No Offence, but your comments are closer to BS than what you are saying.. you obviously haven't been paying attenmtion...
IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by MillerTIME: ... well, if you want the truth.
MT Please go back and read my original post again, because you've missed every point I made.
1. I asked you to "leave me out of your squabbles with others." I meant that, so please respect my request in the future.
2. I said "I don't care what gender Skunksyard is ... so I have no reason to seek proof of anything you say." I also meant that, so why are you offering me "proof" of something I don't care about?
3. I asked you not to "start a witchhunt here" because it just doesn't matter to me who or what anyone really is. And I meant that too, so why are you still searching for the elusive "he/she" poster. Just guessing, but I think you'll find a lot more "he/she" posters than you imagine. And also some "its", some "whats", some "maybes" and some "I don't knows". And the last I heard, no one buys any of their pelts anymore. No market for them.
4. I said that "I form opinions about people based solely on what they post, and it doesn't matter to me if they do not match my mental image of them." And guess what? I meant that too. Do you want to know where my opinion of you is headed right now?
By the way, I just posted a reply to someone else that summarized my feelings about message board posters. Take a look. OK? You're wearing out my typing fingers, and I only have two of them. [/qb][/QUOTE]
-------------------- Everything I say is only my opinion ... right or wrong.
IP: Logged |
imakmony2005
unregistered
posted
imakmony2005 Member
posted February 07, 2006 02:06 PM -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- MILLERTIME,Yep that was me is and still is my user name AND I WONT POST PMs THAT PEOPLE SEND ME ON THE OPEN BOARD, LIKE YOU WILL DO AND KEEP DOING.
-------------------- Kick me and i will Kick you back.
IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Jennifercd10: Hi everyone ... Well, we sure live in interesting times. I'm out of town and computerless so I'm at the library. Just a couple of points or so....
Hi, Jenn. Wondered what happened to you. I know what you're going through ... I've been "down and out" (no computer access) many times in my life and have had to resort to drastic measures. Which is why I always carry a hand-printed sign stating: "Computerless ... will work for internet access."
And ... "I have always depended on the kindness of strangers." (If I quote any more Tennessee Williams, someone will suspect I'm not who I say I am ... but then, is anyone? )
-------------------- Everything I say is only my opinion ... right or wrong.
IP: Logged |
posted
if she is a cross dresser, we might wanna start calling her a he?
GF
quote:Originally posted by Ligge:
quote:Originally posted by MillerTIME:
quote:Originally posted by Ligge: MT, I believe you are grasping at straws, possibly due to garbage someone else has given you. The unknown comment refers to the fact that you are calling someone out yet you dont say who so that makes them unknown.
If you had any real proof I find it very hard to believe that you would stay quiet (thats not in your nature it seems) since proof would protect you from any libelous or slander accusations. The only proof you are hoping to get is an admission from someone here.
Thank you, obviously your wrong about my "seeming nature" because here ya go Ligge.
Ask JenniferCD10 what the CD stands for
You still didnt do anything but imply that there is something nefarious in relation to Jennifer's name. If you are trying to imply that she is the insider and you have tangible proof of that accusation you can share then say spit it out. If not, I would drop it.
quote:Originally posted by ricecakes: LETS NOT FORGET OUR RECORD OF ACCOMPLISHMENTS. WE HAVE LAUNCHED WITH 5 CARRIERS. 4 SINCE AUGUST.
Launching with 5 carriers may be a accomplishment, but it doesnt mean squat if no one is subscribing to the service. I for one would be announcing my subscription numbers as often as I can to show that there is momentum with QTN. Look at SIRI, they were always announcing their subscription numbers, both current and future. QBID (aka Frank) hasn't release any numbers. So, I can only conclude, at this time,that he doesn't have any good number to release. Which means if he doesn't have any subscribers, then he doesn't have any income, which means he has to dump shares, when he runs out of shares, he lays people off and closes the studios.
The road to hell is not pertty. And I lose over $11K
FRANK IS NOT THE KIND OF PERSON TO JUST QUIT. HE WILL POUND THE PAVEMENT TO GET NEW FINANCING. SUBCRIPTIONS SHOULD BE THE FOCUS NOW. WITH THOSE COMES REVENUE.
Turn off the caps.
-------------------- Remember two things: You love New York City and leave only your footprints.
IP: Logged |
Employees at Q Television Network, one of three cable channels aimed at gay and lesbian viewers, claim that they are not being paid as the company faces increasing financial difficulties. Two employees, speaking on condition of anonymity, revealed that an internal memo indicated that one of Q's investors had dropped out, leaving the company to scramble for funds. It was reported Friday on Out.com that the network was going "on hiatus" until February 13, but at that time Q's executive vice president of network operations, Carol Hinnant, reported that full-time employees would continue to be paid.
When contacted by Advocate.com on Monday, Hinnant refused to comment on the late paychecks but said, "Every network has growing pains. We'll be back on the 13th, and we hope [our employees] will be back." Hinnant disputed claims by one of the Q employees that most of the network staff had gone home Monday after being informed that the paychecks they were due to receive on February 1, and then on February 3, would still not be available. (Advocate.com)
posted
Of course we hide our true identities and do not disclose details about our private lives. It's a matter of protecting oneself. Just look at the world around you. There are some real nut cases out there that could go postal just because they disagree with what you post on a message board. That doesn't mean you have to provide a false imagge of who you really are. For instance, I will tell you my name is Kim, I live in the San Antonio area, and I am a part time bookkeeper/office manager for a construction company. I can tell you how many shares of Q I own, when I bought them, what I bought them for, etc. etc. That is providing factual information. However, I certainly am not going to disclose my full name, address, phone number or a pic of me, because I wouldn't want to encounter some psycho from a message board. You can be honest about who you are without revealing who you are.
quote:Originally posted by Bottomliner:
quote:Originally posted by hagatha: If I may... I don't believe it is about the gender. I believe it is about how one portrays themselves as something or someone, only to find out that it is not true. It's all about honesty. If they can't be honest about who they are posting as, how can one be sure WHAT they are posting is the truth?
hagatha You've made a valid point, but remember that we all hide our true identities by using screennames and by "not sharing" details about our private lives. When everyone posting here tells us their real name, address, age and gender and provides a recent photo, I'll be critical of anyone who holds back. Until then, I'll continue to accept whatever personal information someone chooses to share, even if it's not true. After all, we shouldn't believe anything posted on a message board anyway, so what does it matter who or what said it?
And after reading some recent posts here, I am very glad no one knows who I am and where I live, because I just might fear for my life ...
By the way, I don't consider using a false identity on a message board as unethical unless you are soliciting a sexual partner. In that case, I think "all the goods" should be revealed up front.
quote:Originally posted by moosehead9nc: February 07, 2006
Financial problems plague Q Television
Employees at Q Television Network, one of three cable channels aimed at gay and lesbian viewers, claim that they are not being paid as the company faces increasing financial difficulties. Two employees, speaking on condition of anonymity, revealed that an internal memo indicated that one of Q's investors had dropped out, leaving the company to scramble for funds. It was reported Friday on Out.com that the network was going "on hiatus" until February 13, but at that time Q's executive vice president of network operations, Carol Hinnant, reported that full-time employees would continue to be paid.
When contacted by Advocate.com on Monday, Hinnant refused to comment on the late paychecks but said, "Every network has growing pains. We'll be back on the 13th, and we hope [our employees] will be back." Hinnant disputed claims by one of the Q employees that most of the network staff had gone home Monday after being informed that the paychecks they were due to receive on February 1, and then on February 3, would still not be available. (Advocate.com)
posted
or you could just throw it all out there in the name of trusting humanity and hope for the best
~BB
...that said, if y'all dont hear from me for a long time, someone call my agent JK!
quote:Originally posted by hagatha: Of course we hide our true identities and do not disclose details about our private lives. It's a matter of protecting oneself. Just look at the world around you. There are some real nut cases out there that could go postal just because they disagree with what you post on a message board. That doesn't mean you have to provide a false imagge of who you really are. For instance, I will tell you my name is Kim, I live in the San Antonio area, and I am a part time bookkeeper/office manager for a construction company. I can tell you how many shares of Q I own, when I bought them, what I bought them for, etc. etc. That is providing factual information. However, I certainly am not going to disclose my full name, address, phone number or a pic of me, because I wouldn't want to encounter some psycho from a message board. You can be honest about who you are without revealing who you are.
quote:Originally posted by Bottomliner:
quote:Originally posted by hagatha: If I may... I don't believe it is about the gender. I believe it is about how one portrays themselves as something or someone, only to find out that it is not true. It's all about honesty. If they can't be honest about who they are posting as, how can one be sure WHAT they are posting is the truth?
hagatha You've made a valid point, but remember that we all hide our true identities by using screennames and by "not sharing" details about our private lives. When everyone posting here tells us their real name, address, age and gender and provides a recent photo, I'll be critical of anyone who holds back. Until then, I'll continue to accept whatever personal information someone chooses to share, even if it's not true. After all, we shouldn't believe anything posted on a message board anyway, so what does it matter who or what said it?
And after reading some recent posts here, I am very glad no one knows who I am and where I live, because I just might fear for my life ...
By the way, I don't consider using a false identity on a message board as unethical unless you are soliciting a sexual partner. In that case, I think "all the goods" should be revealed up front.
posted
LMAO! Trust humanity? Oh, Oh, stop! That's a good one!
quote:Originally posted by betting babe: or you could just throw it all out there in the name of trusting humanity and hope for the best
~BB
...that said, if y'all dont hear from me for a long time, someone call my agent JK!
quote:Originally posted by hagatha: Of course we hide our true identities and do not disclose details about our private lives. It's a matter of protecting oneself. Just look at the world around you. There are some real nut cases out there that could go postal just because they disagree with what you post on a message board. That doesn't mean you have to provide a false imagge of who you really are. For instance, I will tell you my name is Kim, I live in the San Antonio area, and I am a part time bookkeeper/office manager for a construction company. I can tell you how many shares of Q I own, when I bought them, what I bought them for, etc. etc. That is providing factual information. However, I certainly am not going to disclose my full name, address, phone number or a pic of me, because I wouldn't want to encounter some psycho from a message board. You can be honest about who you are without revealing who you are.
quote:Originally posted by Bottomliner:
quote:Originally posted by hagatha: If I may... I don't believe it is about the gender. I believe it is about how one portrays themselves as something or someone, only to find out that it is not true. It's all about honesty. If they can't be honest about who they are posting as, how can one be sure WHAT they are posting is the truth?
hagatha You've made a valid point, but remember that we all hide our true identities by using screennames and by "not sharing" details about our private lives. When everyone posting here tells us their real name, address, age and gender and provides a recent photo, I'll be critical of anyone who holds back. Until then, I'll continue to accept whatever personal information someone chooses to share, even if it's not true. After all, we shouldn't believe anything posted on a message board anyway, so what does it matter who or what said it?
And after reading some recent posts here, I am very glad no one knows who I am and where I live, because I just might fear for my life ...
By the way, I don't consider using a false identity on a message board as unethical unless you are soliciting a sexual partner. In that case, I think "all the goods" should be revealed up front.
posted
You know it must be pretty bad, when Frankie boy's employees will not take QBID stock in lieu of a paycheck. They prefer to walk off. This should be a good indicator... LOL! Hell, it seems no one want's to take Frankie boys worthless QBID stock anymore. Unfortunately, I still have mine. Show us the money Frankie boy – Or at least show us the freakin’ audit.
quote:Originally posted by moosehead9nc: February 07, 2006
Topic Closed
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
Printer-friendly view of this topic
![[Big Grin]](biggrin.gif)
![[Wink]](wink.gif)
![[Eek!]](eek.gif)
![[Cool]](cool.gif)
