------------------------------------------ Appears to be good news to some investors.
------------------------------------------
From Ivory on the good time board -----------------------------------
It took them no time to think.LOL which has amazed me today...I believe they(SEC)have done the right thing and some of us have expected that would happen. They did it so quick and the way the TEAM has asked for. They have either to halt CMKX or to revoke CMKX because of our GOOD dividends are coming. Think it this way that Frizzell has to declare the record date before dividends can be distributed. The time b/w the Declaration date and the Record date could be 10 days which everyone would buy CMKX like crazy due to the too good dividends. This would drive to volume bananas and everthing else go nuts so the SEC....The TEAM & SEC did not want to see this buying Frenzy in CMKX to happen...Just a thought!
-------------------- Marty When I was born, I was granted a visitors pass to earth. I will enjoy everyday until it has expired. You should too ;) Posts: 1740 | From: NJ, USA | Registered: Oct 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
"The Private Placement has been closed in escrow and, upon the cheques being cleared and proceeds being received by the Company, the Company will issue 7,000,000 units, each unit comprised of one common share and one share purchase warrant exercisable for a period of two years at an exercise price of USD$0.25 per warrants. The price per unit was USD$0.15."
from the pr today...notice the price & the total shares. 14 million total common shares, the first at .15 & the second at .25, thats 2 shares per unit. or .35 for 2 shares. when the only way to get money is sell your stock at a 50+% discount something is about to change & it isn't a good thing. makes ya wonder if it isn't more of the money UC got selling cmkx shares. & that will not help cmkx the company or the cmkx shares legal.
-------------------- "keep your stick on the ice & your cup firmly in place" Posts: 3651 | From: Algonac, MI. 48001 | Registered: Jun 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
Bill then too UC and family restricted shares they were given last Dec. will be unrestricted this Dec.
Now the shares that CMKX shareholders get will be restricted and the Casavant that frontloaded this stock will get to dump there shares before CMKX shareholders and the warrants. So they should get a sweet deal.
So the question of the day is. How large will the o/s be by the time CMKX shareholders get to trade their shares and with that dilution then what do you think there PPS will drop to?
I tried to tell people they would be better off to sell CMKX and buy ETGMF if they were dead set on holding this. They would have been a lot better off.
-------------------- Invest with your brain not with your heart. Posts: 4405 | From: Bristol, Tn, USA | Registered: Aug 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
Where's legal at? Trying to make up a new theory before he comes back in here to cover up this new mess of facts. These pesky facts just keep coming up to bite the cult in the butt.
-------------------- Invest with your brain not with your heart. Posts: 4405 | From: Bristol, Tn, USA | Registered: Aug 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
Anyone stupid enough to jump into ETGMF at these prices after the last fiasco with CMKX deserves to lose their dough. Just look at all the fatcats loading their pockets with cheap paper. & MILLION shares * .15 and warrants for .25 I wouldnt buy this until it drops to a nickel and then it would be just for a daytrade. Now shorting it here -that has some merit. LOL
-------------------- The Mouse Posts: 443 | From: Valemount | Registered: Dec 2003
| IP: Logged |
posted
if you could short OTC stock BC i'd call that a sure thing for entourage. it would be money in the bank....lol
-------------------- "keep your stick on the ice & your cup firmly in place" Posts: 3651 | From: Algonac, MI. 48001 | Registered: Jun 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
by the way nothing in todays pr says anything about the units being restricted. the warrents are good for 2 yrs, thats the only condition on anything. 1 would think if restricted it would be not only important but a good thing for the pps to state that. another thing didn't UC's family buy in january or febuary not december as that 1 post implied? not saying it is but that could be 2 differant things.
-------------------- "keep your stick on the ice & your cup firmly in place" Posts: 3651 | From: Algonac, MI. 48001 | Registered: Jun 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
FINALITY ORDERS... CMKM and SGGM UNITED STATES OF AMERICA before the SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 Rel. No. 52694 / October 28, 2005 Admin. Proc. File No. 3-11858 In the Matter of CMKM DIAMONDS, INC. ORDER DISMISSING REVIEW PROCEEDING AND NOTICE OF FINALITY On August 5, 2005, the Commission granted the petition of CMKM Diamonds, Inc. for review of an administrative law judge's initial decision. 1/ On October 26, 2005, CMKM Diamonds requested that its petition be withdrawn and that the Commission make the initial decision of the administrative law judge, and her order revoking the registration of the company's securities, final. It is appropriate to grant CMKM Diamonds' requests. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that this review proceeding be, and it hereby is, dismissed. Notice is hereby given that the initial decision of the administrative law judge has become the final decision of the Commission with respect to CMKM Diamonds, Inc. The order contained in that decision revoking the registration of the securities of CMKM Diamonds, Inc. is hereby declared effective. For the Commission by the Office of the General Counsel, pursuant to delegated authority. Jonathan G. Katz Secretary 1/ CMKM Diamonds, Inc., Initial Decision Rel. No. 291 (July 17, 2005), __ SEC Docket __.
-------------------- Eagles may soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.... Posts: 400 | From: Jupiter, somewhere out there | Registered: Jun 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
does that mean no more trading of shares allowed or is there a wait period till trade halt.
-------------------- Eagles may soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.... Posts: 400 | From: Jupiter, somewhere out there | Registered: Jun 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
i'd say trading is over...does this mean i can finally remove cmkx from my watch list???....lol next up is SGGM & trading will end very soon there too.
-------------------- "keep your stick on the ice & your cup firmly in place" Posts: 3651 | From: Algonac, MI. 48001 | Registered: Jun 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
i thought the cult said the SEC was afraid to end cmkx???...lol i guess this is another proven point for the basher boys. it is a sad day that so many ppl that saw & believed the likes of dr. d & pals had to lose so much money. UC needs to be in jail.
-------------------- "keep your stick on the ice & your cup firmly in place" Posts: 3651 | From: Algonac, MI. 48001 | Registered: Jun 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
Sggm has it's own finality order as of today.
-------------------- Eagles may soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.... Posts: 400 | From: Jupiter, somewhere out there | Registered: Jun 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
So now all the action moves to usca and gemm, at least the old names yet.
-------------------- Eagles may soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.... Posts: 400 | From: Jupiter, somewhere out there | Registered: Jun 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
Okay, this question borders on ignorance or lack of brain cells at this moment but, when I buy 1k shares of ABCD company, don't I purchase somebody's existing shares, like a commodities contract which just keeps changing hands. Doesn't the fist n # shares issued by ABCD return cash to that company, then resold to common shareholders. etc.
-------------------- Eagles may soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.... Posts: 400 | From: Jupiter, somewhere out there | Registered: Jun 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
disregard that posted question, I found invstopedia.com that puts it all in laymen terms. thanks S5
-------------------- Eagles may soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.... Posts: 400 | From: Jupiter, somewhere out there | Registered: Jun 2005
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by bill1352: by the way nothing in todays pr says anything about the units being restricted. the warrents are good for 2 yrs, thats the only condition on anything. 1 would think if restricted it would be not only important but a good thing for the pps to state that. another thing didn't UC's family buy in january or febuary not december as that 1 post implied? not saying it is but that could be 2 differant things.
That came from a call to Entourage today by CDLC on pb32. Not to say if its fact but he supposely ask if they were restricted and the CEO told him yes. Also it came out that Casavants and Koch had private placement restricted shares that become free trading in Dec. They were issued last Jan. and Dec. according to the CEO
-------------------- Invest with your brain not with your heart. Posts: 4405 | From: Bristol, Tn, USA | Registered: Aug 2004
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by bill1352: by the way nothing in todays pr says anything about the units being restricted. the warrents are good for 2 yrs, thats the only condition on anything. 1 would think if restricted it would be not only important but a good thing for the pps to state that. another thing didn't UC's family buy in january or febuary not december as that 1 post implied? not saying it is but that could be 2 differant things.
That came from a call to Entourage today by CDLC on pb32. Not to say if its fact but he supposely ask if they were restricted and the CEO told him yes. Also it came out that Casavants and Koch had private placement restricted shares that become free trading in Dec. They were issued last Jan. and Dec. according to the CEO
Ric,
According to the article released by Stockwatch yesterday,them shares became unrestricted on May 1st of this year.
Posts: 102 | Registered: Feb 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
The only good investment at this point is in KY jelly. We're gonna need a lot of it.
-------------------- If I give you bad information, please feel free to sue me. I have nothing left anyway. Ed Posts: 1772 | From: Oxford, PA, USA | Registered: Oct 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
Ric, let me ask you this....somebody posts they talked to somebody on the phone at PB32, do you believe them????....lol. even if it sounds true like that post does............short OTC???? any costs involved??? must go investigate that. shorting OTC would be too easy...lol
-------------------- "keep your stick on the ice & your cup firmly in place" Posts: 3651 | From: Algonac, MI. 48001 | Registered: Jun 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
Never meant it as the truth just saying where it came from. As far as the supposed phone call.
Ameritrade Apex Newsletter 9/20/2005
New site feature: More ways to trade small-cap stocks
It's now possible to short sell stocks under $5 on our Web site. Another change coming soon will deliver quotes for pink sheet securities on the site, providing you with access to more information when and where you need it.
When trading OTCBB and pink sheet securities, please understand that they can be very volatile and are frequent targets of fraud and manipulation. When trading them, it's important to understand that you may lose your entire investment.² In addition, the risk of loss on a short sale is potentially unlimited (since there is no limit to the price increase of a security). Because there's no guarantee that a brokerage firm can continue to maintain a short position for an unlimited time period, your position may be closed out by the firm without regard to your profit or loss. You may only short sell securities in a margin account. Margin trading increases risk of loss and includes the possibility of a forced sale if account equity drops below required levels. Margin is not available in all account types.³
Good Luck and be careful, Steve
-------------------- Invest with your brain not with your heart. Posts: 4405 | From: Bristol, Tn, USA | Registered: Aug 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
You can hope Trista, but this old dog is a long way from being dead.
Sorry I missed all the excitement Friday. Took a two day holiday with the family, yesterday and today. Went up to Lake Michigan for a little R&R.
So I'm rested up now and ready for an exciting week next week.
But I guess many of you will not be here since it looks like there won't be any more trading and so no newbies will be enticed into buying and they won't need the "Allstocks Saviours" team anymore. Right?
LOL, you'll all still be here because you know this isn't over. Even revoked, not trading, ther is no other stock like this one. Never was, never will be again.
If you all think that Maheu gave up, tucked tail and ran, you really haven't studied this guy much. Wait til you see what's coming next. LOL
[ October 29, 2005, 23:08: Message edited by: legaleagle ]
Posts: 2375 | Registered: Nov 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
You are correct no other stock on any exchange globally has 703 billion OS and after what has been going on with CMKX i seriously doubt there ever will be another ticket with that much OS again.
*just pointing out the obvious*
quote:Originally posted by legaleagle: You can hope Trista, but this old dog is a long way from being dead.
Sorry I missed all the excitement Friday. Took a two day holiday with the family, yesterday and today. Went up to Lake Michigan for a little R&R.
So I'm rested up now and ready for an exciting week next week.
But I guess many of you will not be here since it looks like there won't be any more trading and so no newbies will be enticed into buying and they won't need the "Allstocks Saviours" team anymore. Right?
LOL, you'll all still be here because you know this isn't over. Even revoked, not trading, ther is no other stock like this one. Never was, never will be again.
If you all think that Maheu gave up, tucked tail and ran, you really haven't studied this guy much. Wait til you see what's coming next. LOL
-------------------- M.M. Semester #3 started,Only 7 more semesters to go. Why, in an age where information is so easy to get, cant we find information on one man. Experience is something you dont get until just after you need it. Posts: 1002 | From: Southaven, Mississippi, US | Registered: Nov 2004
| IP: Logged |
Joined: Sept 2005 Posts: 48 14C DD thru Guru PhnxGold « Thread Started on Today at 7:43pm »
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Let’s study the 14C since we all sort of try and avoid this subject. Since were revoked the argument is that now the majority insiders 85.8% controlling interest has been neutralized. I am still trying to figure out how exactly this works. I have listened to PhnxGold before and he knows how to explain it but then I get lost. Maybe we can work together to understand this. 14c document; http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1092299/000111776803000002/schedule.htm CMKI Rights agreement; http://knobias.10kwizard.com/filing.php?repo=tenk&ipage=1993760&doc=4&total=7&back=2
By: phxgold 13 May 2005, 09:24 AM EDT Msg. 213865 of 274982 Jump to msg. # long winded explaination of some dd part 1 after a conversation yesterdaythat showed me my thinking on "the sellers" in the 14c and theyre holdings was flawed I was forced to dig deeper. this is what I came up with. "the sellers" as referred to in the 14c are people that uc owed money, they loaned him the money that uc used to stake the claims is what I gather. I do not believe they knew where the money was going. uc then went into default on the payments. The cmki shell was bought and uc allowed the sellers to come in under forbearance agreements meaning they bought a 4.9% stake in the company for 2million a piece. for all of the forbearance agreements it was a total of 85.8% of cmki. we all know this. Now thinking logically one would deduce that as the a/s increased the sellers would have theyre shares increase to maintain theyre percentage of holdings, I mean who in theyre right mind would vote to dilute theyre stake in a company? Well here is where it gets interresting who in theyre right mind would settle for 4.9% of very valuable diamond claims when they can have the whole enchelada? how you ask since it specifically states that the sellers were bound under a share pooling agreement and couldnt just vote to boot uc out. Heres how. in document 4 of the 14c subsection 8.3 under bankruptsy and recievership if the company goes bankrupt or any of its assets are placed in recievership (heaven forbid uc does anything that could wind him up in jail) the sellers get the claims, uh oh here we go now. so the sellers vote to increase the a/s thus diluting theyre ownership but also devaluing the shares on the market they hook up with an mm and a hedgie then they short cmkx against theyre own holdings which are unregistered btw so it would have to be done in such a way it dosent hit the tape hmmmm how do you do that? lol ok as theyre shorting theyre own shares and driving the price down they also buy on the open market regaining majority control. once that control is regained they vote to increase the a/s again and it continues. and there is nothing uc can do about it. he only holds 8.3%. a good way to verify this may have been what was happening is to look at the articles of ammendment in the 8k recently filed. in feb maj ownership was 51% IN MARCH AFTER AN INCREASE THAT WOULD HAVE DILUTED MAJ OWNERSHIP THERE WAS ANOTHER VOTE WITH 56% MAJ OWNERSHIP. Ok so in march 2004 cmkxtreme uc's private company invested into csii who had just bought deleeuw and associates. deleeuw and associates tracks money laundering and works in patriot act stuff and securities tracking. LET THE GAMES BEGIN.
http://ragingbull.lycos.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=CLB01219&read=213866 By: phxgold 13 May 2005, 09:25 AM EDT Msg. 213866 of 274982 Jump to msg. # long winded explaination of dd part 2 so the o/s is no 500billion and we know that the sellers held at least 51% at that time. there was a meeting in canada and uc came back from that and ammended the articles of incorporation to increase the a/s to 800b but note that document was the only a/s increase not voted on by majority shareholders. so I looked into the rules on the nevada sos site. In the rules it states that ammendments must be voted in by maj shareholder vote unless included in the amendment that it would not be and was decided on by the entire bod. now when did desormeau get the boot? so now we have an a/s of 800b think back to uc's 8.3% in escrow 5% of that is 5% beneficial owner under royaltie stipulated in the 14c so 8.3% of 703b is 60b add that to 300b makes 360b which just so happens to be majority ownership. I believe that is why we arent seeing any share retirement and uc was saying he was buying every share he could get his hands on. He wasnt lying imo he just cannot retire and give up his newly regained 51%. Also I was wondering why all of the claims were migrating to the 025 sask ltd company out of all the other companies. its simple, the 025 company isnt in the 14c. so even if something happened to uc or the company went #### up the sellers dont get jack. now to the naked short. If the sellers were shorting against theyre own shares those shares were unregistered so they would need to be part of the hedgie they were utilizing so they would be essentially selling to themselves. Now if it looked like the company was dumping which it would to the mms it would become a feeding frenzy and they would short the heck out of it thinking they could cover if need be. but there is now way they could because the only real shares were being recycled from seller to seller thru hedgie. so the nss are real and that means all of them. Now that uc holds 51% and the sellers cannot increase the a/s in order to cover theyre short position thru the hedge fund. and theyre shares cannot be registerred as uc wont sign off on them to let them cover theyre short position with them. Theyre stuck. and the market makers are stuck with the nss. That would make sense of all the bashers sure there are disgruntled shareholders but there are paid bashers. both sent by the sellers and the mms see who is now in competition to cover theyre position? thats right the mms and the sellers who tried to burn uc. Isnt it funny that the only thing holding us back from making this happen is the financials that desormeau has remember that cmkx has filed taxes and desormeau was cfo so he has them. why would he be holding out on handing them over? Because if and when we file its all over th sellers are ruined and will probably go to prison and the mms will be theyre biggest competition for shares. wanna see someone squirm? order your certs not all but if we do have 60,000 shareholders and everyone ordered 10mill in certs this thing would be primed for takeoff. all jmo but I cant find a question that isnt answered easily by this scenario. so whatcha think? ~Phx
Posts: 2375 | Registered: Nov 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
leagal, if that cancelled 600 Billion thing is true i will kiss you dead on the lips,,,, I mean that in a manly sorta way of coarse.LOL
-------------------- I don't play well with others, and have a problem with authority. I love to see the big guy fall to the under-dog. Posts: 192 | From: New Jersey - Armpit of the World | Registered: Jul 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
But legal the Official TA master shareholders list says that isn't true. I know you try and tap dance around that by saying its flawed even though the TA gave it to a official court under a subpena, where they could go to jail for not giving the true documents. Then again you probably will go off on the companies and individuals you listed earlier except for the fact that they surrendered their shares. But the cult refuses to look at the facts only what they want to here. They take a doom and gloom document and take one word out of it and make up a complete fairytale. But please buy the last few shares you can of this stock Monday morning before trading stops on Phx recommendation.
-------------------- Invest with your brain not with your heart. Posts: 4405 | From: Bristol, Tn, USA | Registered: Aug 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
Might be a good deal to short entourage a couple million. Hell, if the MMs can make money doing it, why not us?
-------------------- If I give you bad information, please feel free to sue me. I have nothing left anyway. Ed Posts: 1772 | From: Oxford, PA, USA | Registered: Oct 2004
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Ric: Ameritrade Apex Newsletter 9/20/2005
New site feature: More ways to trade small-cap stocks
It's now possible to short sell stocks under $5 on our Web site. Another change coming soon will deliver quotes for pink sheet securities on the site, providing you with access to more information when and where you need it.
When trading OTCBB and pink sheet securities, please understand that they can be very volatile and are frequent targets of fraud and manipulation. When trading them, it's important to understand that you may lose your entire investment.² In addition, the risk of loss on a short sale is potentially unlimited (since there is no limit to the price increase of a security). Because there's no guarantee that a brokerage firm can continue to maintain a short position for an unlimited time period, your position may be closed out by the firm without regard to your profit or loss. You may only short sell securities in a margin account. Margin trading increases risk of loss and includes the possibility of a forced sale if account equity drops below required levels. Margin is not available in all account types.³
Good Luck and be careful, Steve
I posted it above for bill, but it came to Ameritrade APEX members through e-mail. Haven't tried it so can't tell you much about it or whether you have to have an APEX account with Ameritrade.
[ October 30, 2005, 00:06: Message edited by: Ric ]
-------------------- Invest with your brain not with your heart. Posts: 4405 | From: Bristol, Tn, USA | Registered: Aug 2004
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by legaleagle: You can hope Trista, but this old dog is a long way from being dead.
Sorry I missed all the excitement Friday. Took a two day holiday with the family, yesterday and today. Went up to Lake Michigan for a little R&R.
So I'm rested up now and ready for an exciting week next week.
But I guess many of you will not be here since it looks like there won't be any more trading and so no newbies will be enticed into buying and they won't need the "Allstocks Saviours" team anymore. Right?
LOL, you'll all still be here because you know this isn't over. Even revoked, not trading, ther is no other stock like this one. Never was, never will be again.
If you all think that Maheu gave up, tucked tail and ran, you really haven't studied this guy much. Wait til you see what's coming next. LOL
Ah, come on. We have to wait to hear you and Debi come in here and say you were mistaken and we were right.
-------------------- Invest with your brain not with your heart. Posts: 4405 | From: Bristol, Tn, USA | Registered: Aug 2004
| IP: Logged |
Topic Closed
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
Printer-friendly view of this topic
