quote:Originally posted by bill1352: legal...you never answered my question about your claims drilling was on going & you had ppl telling you it was. we just got proof it hasn't been going on for some time now or the claims would not be in default. i guess you either made it up or you have ppl lying to you. funny, everything us merry band of bashers has said has either been proven true or is about to be true yet those 7 guys in Sask. have reliable info but we don't.
bill, I will stand by the drilling information. Two shareholders spend two weeks counting them before security was increased recently. Over 500 holes were counted on the claims. The drilling activity or lack of it was not the condition of default, it was financial.
IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by bill1352: legal...you never answered my question about your claims drilling was on going & you had ppl telling you it was. we just got proof it hasn't been going on for some time now or the claims would not be in default. i guess you either made it up or you have ppl lying to you. funny, everything us merry band of bashers has said has either been proven true or is about to be true yet those 7 guys in Sask. have reliable info but we don't.
bill, I will stand by the drilling information. Two shareholders spend two weeks counting them before security was increased recently. Over 500 holes were counted on the claims. The drilling activity or lack of it was not the condition of default, it was financial.
Well Legal "IF" they had found anything in those 500 holes, they would not have had financial problems, you think!!!!!
-------------------- Be Careful Of The Toes We Step On Today, They Could Be Attached To The Butt We Have To Kiss Tomorrow
IP: Logged |
posted
Ric: "Do you have a problem because I bring real facts to the board or is it that I busted your bubble of this crazy sting theory."
I don't have a problem with any "facts" that you may bring to the board. Any "facts" of the facts you have claimed, most have come from some documents posted by Pedro. He claims those came from an FOIA, yet many of his "old" friends say they showed up on Frizzells door step and he gave them to Pedro and a couple of other shareholders. Now "there" is a realiable source for "facts".
On the sting, you won't ever burst my bubble on that. On some things people can offer an educated guess, but somethings are just "known" and that is one of them. You have already seen part of the results of that sting with the arrest and arraignment of Gary Walters , and the placement of John Edward's CRWN into receivership.
IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by bill1352: legal...you never answered my question about your claims drilling was on going & you had ppl telling you it was. we just got proof it hasn't been going on for some time now or the claims would not be in default. i guess you either made it up or you have ppl lying to you. funny, everything us merry band of bashers has said has either been proven true or is about to be true yet those 7 guys in Sask. have reliable info but we don't.
bill, I will stand by the drilling information. Two shareholders spend two weeks counting them before security was increased recently. Over 500 holes were counted on the claims. The drilling activity or lack of it was not the condition of default, it was financial.
Are you a chronic liar or are you getting paid?
-------------------- Learn the hard way with pennies
IP: Logged |
posted
Ric: "Or is it the fact I have to question your intentions when you take the obvious and play it to your own spin like the revoked situation where you claim to have been in law enforcement but has no clue how the legal system works. And that it doesn't happen over night. This stock will be stopped soon and you know that."
Ric we have been through this once before already and I guess you didn't listen to my anser, just like you usually don't, because you are already onto your next bash.
If the SEC believed that CMKX was a clear and present danger to the investing public, they would have and should have, halted trading. If nothing else, they should have acted by now to halt the trading since we already withdrew our petition, and according to you, this is the biggest scam in history. It's not the Commission has a lot of paperwork on this one. There is no longer any decision for them to make. The decision has already been entered by the ALJ, and now there is no review or reason to delay implementation. Except for the fact that they don't want to lock the DTCC into the NS.
IP: Logged |
posted
Doc, why would they put valuation into a company that they had no plans to continue with? Into a company that was suffering on the largest NS in history. Please note that the Casavants entered into Entourage around the first of January. Are you thinking that they just started planning this?
IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by bill1352: legal...you never answered my question about your claims drilling was on going & you had ppl telling you it was. we just got proof it hasn't been going on for some time now or the claims would not be in default. i guess you either made it up or you have ppl lying to you. funny, everything us merry band of bashers has said has either been proven true or is about to be true yet those 7 guys in Sask. have reliable info but we don't.
bill, I will stand by the drilling information. Two shareholders spend two weeks counting them before security was increased recently. Over 500 holes were counted on the claims. The drilling activity or lack of it was not the condition of default, it was financial.
Are you a chronic liar or are you getting paid?
Do you really do what your name says, or just visit boards being an A$$HOLE?
IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by bill1352: if you actually think i'm waiting or believe legal will ever admit he has been scammed your as lost as he is...lol
bill, have I ever run from anything on this board? True, I sometimes do not answer silly or repetitive questions, but I don't run away.
IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by bill1352: legal...you never answered my question about your claims drilling was on going & you had ppl telling you it was. we just got proof it hasn't been going on for some time now or the claims would not be in default. i guess you either made it up or you have ppl lying to you. funny, everything us merry band of bashers has said has either been proven true or is about to be true yet those 7 guys in Sask. have reliable info but we don't.
bill, I will stand by the drilling information. Two shareholders spend two weeks counting them before security was increased recently. Over 500 holes were counted on the claims. The drilling activity or lack of it was not the condition of default, it was financial.
Are you a chronic liar or are you getting paid?
Do you really do what your name says, or just visit boards being an A$$HOLE?
I like to think both
-------------------- Learn the hard way with pennies
IP: Logged |
posted
Well, you're the one claiming there is. I think it is incumbent upon you to prove it, since you're claiming it. The SEC was asked in the hearing, under oath, and claimed it wasn't shorted. Proof sworn public record. Of course they don't tell the truth according toyu and your ilk.
-------------------- A million seconds is 13 days. A billion seconds is 31 years.
IP: Logged |
posted
Your the one claiming something without proof. Even Frizzell said there was no proof that there is NSS just looks like it. The cult keeps telling people there is the huge NSS that will pay them off if only they stay. And there is not one once of fact to back it up with the tremdous o/s that UC dumped on its unexpecting shareholders.
I think there may have been a little shorting on this but there is no way that they could have sold that many shares on the market and the company dump that many at the same time.
By the way Legal, I am retired from the military taking care of a sick wife. Fortunately I have that ability. I am at home a lot. But I am building a house and right now on the Kitchen. I take breaks and look at the computer while I rest and do have time at night but 16 hours isn't spent on here.
-------------------- Invest with your brain not with your heart.
IP: Logged |
posted
That's the oldest tactic in the book, Ric. Especially used by CMKX faithful pumpers. You ask them to offer hard proof of their claims , and they ask you to prove their claims aren't accurate or true. They don't debate or answer questions, they talk from both sides of their mouth.
Prove it legal. The burden of proof is on the one claiming that NSS exists regarding CMKX. The SEC says it wasn't shorted, it's not on the SHO list. There's two sources of proof it wasn't shorted. Prove them wrong and offer you proof that CMKX is shorted to extreme proportions.
-------------------- A million seconds is 13 days. A billion seconds is 31 years.
IP: Logged |
posted
WELL -Funny thing happened Last Friday, Heard about this deal with ETGMF. Mentioned something about "Carolyn" claims: SO I picked one of the Five holes drilled on those claims from 2 years ago. Found a ragged,aged piece of paper at 931ft that Entourage called wanting to merge. Stupid me loaded up at .47 and left town Came back today and sold for .54 (greedy person that i am).NOW on 30k shares, thought I did well $2100 -The wife immeditely started in on me about CMKX and losing $20k I said OK but what about SGGM or ECPN 4 times and USCA of course a little on GEMM for a total of $32k. She says but CMKX is REVOKED. Of course I relied on UC with the "make a million millionaires" So there you have it MY wife agrees with this board. where do I send the $34,100 ? PS: SORRY heard someone turned out the lights- Guess the $34k is out sight out of mind ! PSSSSSS: THE few of you here for years are so incredibly stupid yhere are no words in the dictionary: Any responces will prove me correct
IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by will: Well, you're the one claiming there is. I think it is incumbent upon you to prove it, since you're claiming it. The SEC was asked in the hearing, under oath, and claimed it wasn't shorted. Proof sworn public record. Of course they don't tell the truth according toyu and your ilk.
Will that's exactly what I am talking about. You just say something as though it is true, but you don't know or check your facts.
Here's what was really said, WILLING TO STIPULATE:
"Now, is the Division willing to stipulate orally that it appears that naked short selling has taken place in this stock?" the judge asked.
"No, Your Honor," Ms. Hakala replied.
"You're not?" Judge Murray queried.
"No, Your Honor," Ms. Hakala repeated.
"Okay," the judge said. "All right. If that's where we are, that's where we are."
quote:Originally posted by will: That's the oldest tactic in the book, Ric. Especially used by CMKX faithful pumpers. You ask them to offer hard proof of their claims , and they ask you to prove their claims aren't accurate or true. They don't debate or answer questions, they talk from both sides of their mouth.
Prove it legal. The burden of proof is on the one claiming that NSS exists regarding CMKX. The SEC says it wasn't shorted, it's not on the SHO list. There's two sources of proof it wasn't shorted. Prove them wrong and offer you proof that CMKX is shorted to extreme proportions.
THE PROOF OF NAKED SHORTING IS WHAT WE ARE AWAITING. THE ONLY ENTITY WITH THE PROOF IS THE SEC AND DTCC AND THEY AREN'T TALKING. WHY? READ FRIZZELL'S POST ABOVE:
"I have sued the SEC to get the fails to deliver information but have not been successful in obtaining that info from the SEC."
WHY HASN'T THE SEC RESPONDED TO LEGAL REQUESTS THAT COULD HAVE BEEN USED TO "PROTECT" THE SHAREHOLDERS THAT SO MANY HERE SEEM CONCERNED WITH? SIMPLY RELEASING THE TRUE NUMBERS COULD HAVE PREVENTED HUNDREDS OR THOUSANDS OF NEW SHAREHOLDERS FROM GETTING INVOLVED.
quote:Originally posted by will: Open to interpretation.
Just prove that it is or was shorted to an extreme.
OPEN TO INTERPRETATION?????? LOL
IT'S VERY CLEAR. THE JUDGE ASKED IF THEY WANTED TO STIPULATE THAT CMKX WAS NAKED SHORTED. THEY SIMPLY STATED THEY DIDN'T WANT TO STIPULATE IT. AND IT'S ALSO INTERESTING THAT THEY DIDN'T WANT FRIZZELL TO PROVE IT EITHER.
IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by will: That isn't proof, just more misinformation and conjecture to siut your contentions. Sorry, fella, not good enough. Try again.
AS CLOSE AS YOU'RE GOING TO GET UNTIL MAHEU UNLEASHES THE DOGS, AND FORCES SHORTY'S HAND. THEN YOU WILL BE ABLE TO SIT AND MENTALLY CALCULATE YOUR LOSSES.
IP: Logged |
I trade shares like that all the time. Buy on rumors sell on news. I made money on CMKX too in the past. But what does one have to do with another as far as holding CMKX. SGGM will be revoked soon and the ones holding the day the final order is issued loses everything. And trading USCA and GEMM is fine, buy on low and sell on high.
But those that got divy's will have to pay some cost to get them unrestricted before they can sell. And thats if they will unrestrict them now that CMKX is no more. Those shares were given in exchange for CMKX rights and CMKX is selling off its assets. USCA may decide that the divy's will remain restricted forever and they can do that.
Now those holding CMKX and told to hold long will get burnt like any penny stock. Right now you can sell CMKX and buy ETGMF for three times the amount of shares as you will get from the divy's. If you believe that 400% dilution won't bring the price down then thats smarter then holder.
Whats smart investing have to do with these pumps on CMKX. Nothing.
-------------------- Invest with your brain not with your heart.
IP: Logged |
posted
Another misleading position by legal. Fact : Maheu resigned, done, finished. There isn't any Maheu, there aren't any dogs to unleash. Misinformation !
-------------------- A million seconds is 13 days. A billion seconds is 31 years.
IP: Logged |
posted
RIC; My money is already in the bank; The divy's will or will not come about; CMKX may be revoked; ALL TRUE- DO I CARE; NO I have used UC PR's since 2000 and sit at a nice profit - I did not sit in these rooms and whine about everything.Day after Day , Month after Month and for some years. I hope CMKX goes away just to release you all. AND THAT IS MEANT AS A BLESSING
IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by legaleagle: Doc, why would they put valuation into a company that they had no plans to continue with? Into a company that was suffering on the largest NS in history. Please note that the Casavants entered into Entourage around the first of January. Are you thinking that they just started planning this?
I am thinking that they had their next scam planned well before CMKX went bust
-------------------- Be Careful Of The Toes We Step On Today, They Could Be Attached To The Butt We Have To Kiss Tomorrow
IP: Logged |
posted
What about BBAN man on the BOD? Hadn't heard anything about him. Remember, Snoop Dogg & Wesley Snipes former manager. And what about Rupert Purin I believe it was, is he still with CMKX Legal?
IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by legaleagle: Doc, why would they put valuation into a company that they had no plans to continue with? Into a company that was suffering on the largest NS in history. Please note that the Casavants entered into Entourage around the first of January. Are you thinking that they just started planning this?
I am thinking that they had their next scam planned well before CMKX went bust
I think UC knew there was no way he could sell more shares after the SEC contacted him and Roger back in Dec. 2004 and told them they had to file. So they had to find a new scam fast and had to cover up the P&D they did with CMKX. Thats why they fought revocation to begin with. To give them the chance to cover up the past and start a new.
-------------------- Invest with your brain not with your heart.
IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by will: Another misleading position by legal. Fact : Maheu resigned, done, finished. There isn't any Maheu, there aren't any dogs to unleash. Misinformation !
Will, once again you run at the mouth without checking your facts. Maheu isn't done.
"On October 21, 2005, the Board of Directors of CMKM approved the formation of a task force consisting of Mr. Robert A. Maheu, Mr. Donald J. Stoecklein, and Mr. Bill Frizzell for the purpose of assisting CMKM and Mr. Maheu, as a designated trustee, to conduct an orderly and verifiable pro rata liquidating distribution of any Entourage shares as reference herein and any other available assets of CMKM.
Mr. Maheu has been selected by the Board of Directors to oversee and facilitate the distribution of the Entourage shares and all other assets. Mr. Maheu has been directed by the sole officer and director of CMKM, Mr. Urban Casavant, to use all means possible, including filing appropriate actions in either Federal or State court, to assure that the bona fide stockholders of CMKM receive a pro rata distribution of the 50 million Entourage shares and any other assets of CMKM."
NOTICE HE WILL BE THE TRUSTEE. PLEASE READ THE REST OF THE 8K THAT DELINEATES THE DUTIES OF THE "TRUSTEE"
IP: Logged |
posted
Whats not true. He resigned the BOD because he wasn't paid. He is no longer and officer or a employee of CMKX.
Yes he is a trustee of the task force to distribute the assets of CMKX which is folding tent. But I think that is just symbolic just as his position on the board.
-------------------- Invest with your brain not with your heart.
IP: Logged |
He built vegas with his mob ties, an ex spook that didn't think twice about plotting to kill Castro and is supposedly tied up with the JFK assasination and the wholed Watergate fiasco among other shady historical events. Anyone with that sort of past is a crook of the highest magnitude.
IP: Logged |
posted
Remember the 'Graduate'? "Plastic!" Well, here's UC's new scam ...........URANIUM, son, Uranium. And it does look like UC was hustling for a new line of product last year when the writing was on the law. WHY IS LEGAL YELLING ALL OF A SUDDEN?? S5....
-------------------- Eagles may soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines....
IP: Logged |
Topic Closed
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
Printer-friendly view of this topic
![[Big Grin]](biggrin.gif)
![[Smile]](smile.gif)
