quote:Originally posted by Wallace#1: Ric, she's out of her mind. Ignore such meanderings.
Here's proof she has completley lost her mind:
WWJDthrume Super Administrator --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posts: 993 Registered: 10/13/2004 Member Is Offline
posted on 9/23/2005 at 14:04
Anticipation
There are millions of CMKX theories out there. Almost as many as there are shares in brokerage accounts or sands on the sea shores. I think I have a good handle on things. Many of you do not follow the message boards and all the rumors.
I think a settlement is about to happen on the naked shorted portion of our stock in the next 30 days or less. Andy recently said we have no adversary, only success. I think we will see a settlement as early as Monday. If it takes longer I won't think it isn't coming. Everything is coming together and the short needs to be resolved. It is too big to trade away.
The settlement could come a couple of ways. I am convinced The money is there. How it gets to us can occur in a couple of ways. One is it shows up in our accounts. That's easy. We do nothing.
Another way the settlement money could come is a controlled 'short squeeze'. It won't be a real short squeeze, but may look like one to some people. The price could go up a little or gap to .10 on news and go up to a 'fake celing' which is really the settlement prices. It may look like people are buying and selling but it will be selling only. No retail buying.
If we have this kind of settlement then selling only small amounts until it gets to the .50 range is advised. I don't know what the settlement price will be. But I think that .10 is too low. Obviously I want it to go as high as possible.
A 'manipulated cover' type settlement could come anytime on news. Today? Why not?
Taxes are a consideration if we are selling. So if you have friends or family you are giving shares to it may be wise to transer those shares and let them pay the taxes. If you have certs take them to the broker and bring the person you want to gift shares to with you to open their own account.
Also if you are going to give to charities for a tax write off it might be better to donate the shares directly to the charity, than to sell and donate the money. You can write off the full amount of the value as a deduction but the stock has to be over one year old. It is worth talking to a tax attorney when we are speaking about this kind of money. Hopefully everyone has a plan to make good use of it. If you need a worthy charity, my Day of Hope board is tax deductible, and sponsors desperately poor children around the world through World Vision. World Vision takes them and their community out of poverty forever. It really works. .87 out of every dollar goes to the child and his/her community project. WV has annual audited financials. They communities get the tools needed to take them to sustainable development. There is a link to the CMKX day of hope site at the bottom. Signing up is always appreciated but you can post or lurk without signing up.
I will be taking groups of people to visit various World Vision projects in Asia, Africa, Latin and South America including some islands. I need to add trip info to the day of hope board but it will be coming very soon. (I started adding it today). You can email your interest or PM me on that board.
I am hoping to be in Vegas for the inevitable party that CMKX will have. I hope it is this October. A year later than the first one.
I plan to host a suite for World Vision and Christian Traders at the Wynn. Bring the family by. I will post hours for open house. Definitely will have a Cappucino station. Kool Aid fountain (CMKX cult joke) and some other perks.
This is IMO as usual.
I think if you are in you win and hopefully Wynn! ( I really do want to have another party in Vegas). The first one was fun but we didn't get our good news. I think it is coming now. (need a different word besides soon, close and now. Perhaps when we can write IT HAPPENED!!! some will believe.)
IMO-God Bless-Debi
-------------------- A million seconds is 13 days. A billion seconds is 31 years.
IP: Logged |
posted
Yes its a lease agreement. But that mean CMKX doesn't own it and that means unless something is found, CMKX does not have any valuation. I mean, If I lease a house and it doesn't work out, I can't sell it because it doesn't belong to me. Besides that how do you know that new claims that Koch picks up are cmkx's?
But it still comes down to money and exploration. Exploration is a huge expense. Looks like UC blew all the money on race cars, hummers, home, slots and friends. The books say CMKX is in debt so where is the money to explore? I think Debeers spent what 1.2 billion to explore Canada? UC stopped filing for a reason, he promoted Got CMKX for a reason and that reason was made clear. Pump and Dump. Any novice in the market can look at the records and see that.
-------------------- Invest with your brain not with your heart.
IP: Logged |
posted
Sorry Ric, I missed the dream sequence, and the Dr King, I have a dream speech from her. I don't visit other boards. Someone PM'd me that earlier today, that's how I got it to repost. Just shameful nonsense.
-------------------- A million seconds is 13 days. A billion seconds is 31 years.
IP: Logged |
posted
So, there is no gag order...wonder how UC and Mahoo will explain why they have been silent for so long. And for legal, show me a PR with everything in it that you have been spouting, and then I'll believe it. Remember we were told not to believe ANYTHING that wasnt in a PR? Well, where are they? Andy has time to send cryptic little messages on yahoo, but no time to get a PR? That guy is worse than Melvin !!!! Even if they dont have any records or financials, that doesnt stop them from issuing a PR about what they are DOING. No drilling news, no results, no nothing, just a bunch of bullcrap from people like you. I still dont think you know what you are talking about, because you offer no proof, just innuendo. And as long as you keep that up, you are a bull artist just like UC.
-------------------- If I give you bad information, please feel free to sue me. I have nothing left anyway. Ed
IP: Logged |
posted
ed, you just don't know the difference between bullchit and horsechit. Bullchit is the when a guy is lying and doesn't know what he's talking about, horsechit is when he belives his bullchit.
-------------------- A million seconds is 13 days. A billion seconds is 31 years.
IP: Logged |
posted
i saw the lease agreement legal, according to that agreement & known cmkx facts i'd say that agreement has as much value as 1 share of cmkx has today. that half-azz general ledger had nothing in it saying UC was keeping up his end of that agreement.
-------------------- "keep your stick on the ice & your cup firmly in place"
IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by ed19363: can you prove a negative? I have no proof that I have never been on a space shuttle. But you have no proof that I havent.
So what does that mean? SQUAT !!!
Thanks Ed, you prove my point with Bill:
Bill: i saw the lease agreement legal, according to that agreement & known cmkx facts i'd say that agreement has as much value as 1 share of cmkx has today. that half-azz general ledger had nothing in it saying UC was keeping up his end of that agreement.
Bill refers to a "half-azz" ledger and because it doesn't say anything he assumes that it doesn't exist. How do you prove or disprove a negative like that. That is the real "horse-chit" on this thread. There is a very real lease and it places UC's, long-time, best friend, Emmerson Koch in control of the claims for us and our rights are secured by a lease and mining agreement, plain and simple.
Now when the "run up" starts soon, would all of you please sell any shares you might still have. Especially before the settlement. It just wouldn't seem right for those of you have bashed UC et al, to share in the profits.
IP: Logged |
posted
Pedro has a nice reply to the claims that are supposed to be under lease. There suppose to be an amendment A for new claims and the company never filed it. I know legal will so that it doesn't prove they didn't but they bragged about everything else. So all those new claims legal boosted about may not be CMKX's after all.
posted
claims are protected???? i missed something. where does it say the claims are protected? is there an agreement in place that protects those claims? it would seem protection is provided by meeting your end of the lease agreement. if that has been done it would make sence that there is a record of the money spent. a $5 million pay out on the date stated in the contract till 2008. that would mean a payment was made just about 2 months ago. $36 million in the hole, needs $5 million for diamond claims, $2 million for gold claims & a 703.5 billion o/s. oh ya about a 60 days from being revoked. did i mention that $5 million payment would increase if the amount of claims increased according to the contract? yep i'd say this was all set for a big pps run up. good call legal.....legal, i think you need your medication adjusted.
-------------------- "keep your stick on the ice & your cup firmly in place"
IP: Logged |
posted
Well, he was answering someones else's claims that they were protected. This is the key to his post that I found intriguing. Where is the amended schedule A?
In order to include the claims acquired after 08/01/2003, there must be an Amendment to the Mineral Lease Agreement dated 08/01/2003. In addition, the annual lease payment will increase.
Page 4 ~~ Section 9
From lease agreement:
"The parties acknowledge and agree that in the event 101047025 Saskatchewan Ltd., acquires additional land or mineral claims as they become available within the Province of Saskatchewan, that CMKI shall have a first right to acquire said properties from 101047025 Saskatchewan Ltd., on the same terms and conditions as set forth herein at a price to be mutually determined by nor parties. In the event new claims are acquired, Schedule A hereto shall be amended to reflect the newly acquired properties and the terms of payment and rights to provide exploration, drilling and related work shall extend five years from the date of said claims. "
-------------------- Invest with your brain not with your heart.
IP: Logged |
Please note that Schedule A has been omitted from the agreement. Schedule A is a list of claims that pertain to this contract.
Page 1
Quote:"WHEREAS 101047025 Saskatchewan Ltd., has acquired certain mining claims from the Province of Saskatchewan and all rights, concessions and obligations attached hereto, a list of said claims being attached hereto as Schedule A"
The Mineral Lease Agreement is dated 08/01/2003.
Only those claims acquired by 7025 prior to 08/01/2003 will be on Schedule A.
-------------------- Invest with your brain not with your heart.
IP: Logged |
posted
Blast from the past. There is only three names listed in this. I don't understand why the cult can't see the writting on the wall that it was UC that dumped shares. Sack. sure seen it and stopped it.
IN THE MATTER OF THE SECURITIES ACT, 1988, S.S. 1988, c. S-42.2 AND IN THE MATTER OF URBAN ARMAND JOSEPH CASAVANT DAVID DeSORMEAU CASAVANT MINING KIMBERLITE INTERNATIONAL CMKM DIAMONDS, INC. MELVIN A. O'NEIL TEMPORARY ORDER (Section 134)
WHEREAS the Saskatchewan Financial Services Commission (the "Commission") has delegated to the Director of the Securities Division (the "Director") the power to make orders pursuant to Section 134 of The Securities Act, 1988 (the Act); WHEREAS it has been represented to the Director by the staff of the Commission that: 1. Urban Armand Joseph Casavant ("Casavant"), David DeSormeau ("DeSormeau"), Casavant Mining Kimberlite International ("CMKI"), CMKM Diamonds, Inc. ("CMKM") and Melvin A. O'Neil ("O'Neil"), (collectively the "Respondents") have traded in the securities of CMKI and CMKM in Saskatchewan; 2. The Respondents traded in the securities of CMKI and CMKM when they were not registered pursuant to section 27 of the Act; 3. The Respondents traded in the securities of CMKI and CMKM when no receipt had been issued pursuant to section 58 of the Act with respect to those securities; 4. The Commission or Director has not issued an order pursuant to sections 83, 160 or any other provision of the Act exempting the Respondents and the securities of CMKI and CMKM from the registration and prospectus requirements of the Act; 5. The Respondents have, with the intention of effecting trades in the securities of CMKI and CMKM, made statements which they know or ought reasonably to know are misrepresentations, contrary to subsection 44(3.1) of the Act; AND WHEREAS the Director is of the opinion that it is in the public interest to make this Order; AND WHEREAS the Director is of the opinion that the length of time required for a hearing would be prejudicial to the public interest; THE DIRECTOR HEREBY ORDERS: 1. Pursuant to clause 134(1)(d) of the Act that trading in all securities by and of The Respondents cease forthwith up to and including November 9, 2004; and 2. Pursuant to clause 134(1)(a) of the Act, that the exemptions contained in sections 38, 39, 39.1, 81, 82 and 102 of the Act and the exemptions contained in The Securities Regulations, R.R.S., c. S-42.2 Reg 1, which provide for exemptions from the requirements of sections 27, 58, 71 or 104 to 109 of the Act, shall not apply forthwith up to and including November 9, 2004, with respect to any trade in securities by the Respondents; AND TAKE NOTICE THAT: 1. This Order may be extended for such period as the Director considers necessary where sufficient information is not provided to the Director on or before November 9, 2004; 2. The Commission will, at the request of any person or company named in this Order, grant a hearing before the Commission with respect to the within matter, such hearing to be held at such time and place as the Commission shall determine; 3. The purpose of such hearing will be to consider whether it is in the public interest that a permanent cease trade order pursuant to clause 134(1)(d) of the Act and a permanent prohibition of statutory exemptions pursuant to clause 134(1)(a) of the Act be made with respect to the Respondents by reason of the conduct herein before described and by reason of failing to provide the Commission with satisfactory information on or before the date of the hearing or any extension thereof by the Commission; 4. Any party to these proceedings may be represented by counsel of their choice at any such hearing before the Commission; and 5. Upon failure of any party to attend any such hearing at the time and place set therefore, the hearing may proceed in the absence of such party and such party is not entitled to any further notice of the proceedings therein. DATED at Regina, Saskatchewan on October 26, 2004. “Barbara Shourounis”<br>Barbara Shourounis Director - Securities Division Saskatchewan Financial Services Commission
posted
IN THE MATTER OF THE SECURITIES ACT, 1988, S. S. 1988, c. S-42.2 AND IN THE MATTER OF URBAN ARMAND JOSEPH CASAVANT DAVID DeSORMEAU CASAVANT MINING KIMBERLITE INTERNATIONAL CMKM DIAMONDS, INC. MELVIN A. O'NEIL EXTENDING ORDER (Section 134) WHEREAS the Saskatchewan Financial Services Commission, Securities Division issued a Temporary Order dated October 26, 2004 (the "Temporary Order") pursuant to clause 134(1)(d) of The Securities Act, 1988, S.S. 1988, c. S-42.2 (the "Act") that trading in securities in Saskatchewan by Urban Armand Joseph Casavant ("Casavant"), David DeSormeau ("DeSormeau"), Casavant Mining Kimberlite International ("CMKI"), CMKM Diamonds, Inc. ("CMKM") and Melvin A. O'Neil ("O'Neil"), (collectively the "Respondents"); cease forthwith up to and including November 9, 2004 and that pursuant to clause 134(1)(a) of the Act that the exemptions contained in sections 38, 39, 39.1, 81, 82, and 102 of the Act and the exemptions contained in The Securities Regulations, R.R.S., c. S-42.2 Reg 1, which provide for exemptions from the requirements of sections 27, 58, 71, or 104 to 109 of the Act, shall not apply forthwith up to and including November 9, 2004 with respect to any trade in securities by the Respondents; AND WHEREAS the Commission has not received a request from the Respondents for a hearing pursuant to the terms of the Temporary Order; AND WHEREAS the Commission has not been provided with satisfactory information with respect to this matter; AND WHEREAS the Commission is of the opinion that it is in the public interest to make this Order;
THE COMMISSION HEREBY ORDERS pursuant to subsection 134(3) of the Act that the Temporary Order be and is hereby extended until the Commission is provided with satisfactory information to enable it to make a further order in this matter. DATED at Regina, Saskatchewan on November 9, 2004. "David Wild" David Wild, Chairperson Saskatchewan Financial Services Commission
-------------------- Invest with your brain not with your heart.
IP: Logged |
posted
5. The Respondents have, with the intention of effecting trades in the securities of CMKI and CMKM, made statements which they know or ought reasonably to know are misrepresentations,
i think that says it all. you dont see the canadian partners ever mentioning those claims in any way. the 1 time they did they were halted until theyt pr'ed the fact that diamondferious was in reality .0011 micrograms. also as i posted the payment according to that contract is over $5 million as Ric was kind enough to post. without that amendment these new claims are not part of the deal. in fact there should be a number of new amendments as Pedro's findings show claims being filed right up into this yr. each new set of claims would require a new amendment & a new price to be paid. that $5 million could be $10 million by now.
-------------------- "keep your stick on the ice & your cup firmly in place"
IP: Logged |
posted
hmmmm, just had a thought....legal might be right about this sting thing. wouldn't the sting company be a company with no real assets? sure seems to look like cmkx fits that mold.
-------------------- "keep your stick on the ice & your cup firmly in place"
IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by ed19363: can you prove a negative? I have no proof that I have never been on a space shuttle. But you have no proof that I havent.
So what does that mean? SQUAT !!!
Thanks Ed, you prove my point with Bill:
Bill: i saw the lease agreement legal, according to that agreement & known cmkx facts i'd say that agreement has as much value as 1 share of cmkx has today. that half-azz general ledger had nothing in it saying UC was keeping up his end of that agreement.
Bill refers to a "half-azz" ledger and because it doesn't say anything he assumes that it doesn't exist. How do you prove or disprove a negative like that. That is the real "horse-chit" on this thread. There is a very real lease and it places UC's, long-time, best friend, Emmerson Koch in control of the claims for us and our rights are secured by a lease and mining agreement, plain and simple.
Now when the "run up" starts soon, would all of you please sell any shares you might still have. Especially before the settlement. It just wouldn't seem right for those of you have bashed UC et al, to share in the profits.
Legal, you freaking idiot, I was talking about YOU, not Bill. Ever since this started, you have been bringing in theory after theory with no proof of anything at all. Riddles and rhymes with not one solid fact to back them up. No names, just guessing games. IMHO, if you really knew anything you would do all of us a favor and share anything you know for a fact. I know most here would really like to know WTF if going on. Most investors I know SHARE their DD instead of turning it into a game. We are all here for the same thing, making money. Maybe I havent made myself plain enough. My opinion of you is that you know nothing, are probably being paid to spread your garbage, and only post for the attention it brings you. I hope we never meet, because I would be severely tempted to smack you just for drill. Now you are free to twist this any way you want, or you just might consider sharing something that would make us all believers, instead of spreading innuendos. I cant speak any clearer than that. So you go on posting your drivel, and when all the smoke clears we will see who knew what.
-------------------- If I give you bad information, please feel free to sue me. I have nothing left anyway. Ed
IP: Logged |
So you say you have the evidence of Urban's bad faith with the shareholders? What you have is the "one-sided" stack of papers distributed by the SEC in their investigation of CMKX. Do they look bad for Urban and company? You bet, they were gathered by a government organization bent on accumulating and placing the worst light possible on a company. That's their job. Stoecklein's job is/was to show the other side, and for whatever reason, he chose not to. And I suspect that his reasons were proper and judicious.
But with that said, let me present a different picture than the one being presented here by some who have seen those documents. My background is a retired White Collar Crime Detective in a major midwestern city police department. During that time, I had occasion many times to investigate organized criminal corporate crime. So my opinion here is based on some experience, but it is opinion only.
I received a tip last year that the operations of CMKX were a "sting" operation by the Department of Justice, springing from the arrest, conviction and turning of states evidence by Shawn Hackman. I have been looking and researching from that point of view ever since, and have seen nothing to dissuade or discourage that point of view. Quite the contrary, I have seen mounting evidence that tends to support it.
So just for the sake of argument, let me present a possible scenario.
Shawn Hackman is picked up by the DOJ for his activities in a major criminal enterprise.
Hackman flips on everyone he has done business with.
Ed Dhonau's name comes up from corporate activity he shared with Hackman.
Dhonau is called in by DOJ and presented with facts and evidence against him, and given an opportunity to work with the Feds to get to their real target.
Dhonau calls his long time attorney, Roger Glenn, to broker the deal.
Roger involves himself and the DOJ wants to use CMKX as their vehicle for additional sting operations.
UC is called upon to act as the "principal" of the sting, along with Dhonau, and begins "maneuvering" the company in the directions required by the DOJ to gather the necessary information on the "target".
At this point, Urban would have been required to do any number of things that might appear "shady" or criminal in order to accomplish investigative goals. Yes, monies would have changed hands, documents would have been created, shares would have been distributed questionably. In summary, he would have followed the instructions of the DOJ to remain actively complicit in the operations of the "target" until they had gathered enough evidence to spring the trap. I think that was substantially completed several months ago. But DOJ cases often extend out into other operations of their targets, and it is a slow, belabored operation to gather all of the necessary evidence for proper presentation to a special Grand Jury for indictments, frequently encompassing hundreds of counts of criminal activity.
So what happens to the company and the co-operating "principal"? The company goes on with business. In this case, they go on accumulating claims, drilling holes, sampling cores, etc.; while the DOJ goes on about it's prosecution efforts. And the principal goes on acting out his role as best he can until the sting is totally revealed. That most definitely includes PUBLIC SILENCE about anything which might reveal the sting. It includes going on with the "appearance" of being complicit with the target. It includes appearing to be a target of investigation himself, until the sting is complete.
Is Urban capable of carrying out all of this himself? Is he capable of keeping the sting confidential under the scrutiny of partners, thousand of shareholders and other government agencies? Is he capable of keeping the company together and functional under intense public scrutiny of his operations? No, probably not.
In comes Maheu, courtesy of the DOJ. (Of course he has been quietly involved since 03 and the Crystallix deals) Capable of holding together a corporation in troubled times. Capable of "conditioning atmospheres". Capable of brokering deals with Government and Industry. Capable of maintaining secrecy. Capable of assisting in prosecutions. Capable of working with intelligence agencies who may be examining financial terrorism emanating from the hedge funds. Capable of turning back threats from organized crime figures and cartels. How else would a "penny pink scam" manage to involve a man of Maheu's stature and experience except through high level, government intervention?
So is this what happened? I don't know for sure, it's only an opinion. But an opinion that is as valid as anything that has been thrown out here in recent weeks. I know this though, if you apply this scenario, many questionable and troubling occurences begin to make a lot more sense.
posted
you posted that 1 before legal. any person with their head based in reality would look at that & ask if the person that wrote it was seeking help with their drug problem or if maybe they had missed their medication for a few days. at best they would ask if that person was seeking the help of the mental health profession. the whole sting idea is based on a way to make a swcam look good or keep the dream alive. something, anything to explain a company that has taken 50K ppl for a ride & kicked them out of the bus at the end.
-------------------- "keep your stick on the ice & your cup firmly in place"
IP: Logged |
posted
Ed: "Legal, you freaking idiot, I was talking about YOU, not Bill. Ever since this started, you have been bringing in theory after theory with no proof of anything at all. Riddles and rhymes with not one solid fact to back them up. No names, just guessing games. IMHO, if you really knew anything you would do all of us a favor and share anything you know for a fact. I know most here would really like to know WTF if going on. Most investors I know SHARE their DD instead of turning it into a game. We are all here for the same thing, making money. Maybe I havent made myself plain enough. My opinion of you is that you know nothing, are probably being paid to spread your garbage, and only post for the attention it brings you. I hope we never meet, because I would be severely tempted to smack you just for drill. Now you are free to twist this any way you want, or you just might consider sharing something that would make us all believers, instead of spreading innuendos. I cant speak any clearer than that. So you go on posting your drivel, and when all the smoke clears we will see who knew what."
Ed, you have made yourself "plain enough" before. Your responses to me speak clearly to the source. You think you made a mistake investing in CMKX. Other posters here support that feeling. Since you are angry at the company and it's management, you are also angry at anyone who speaks in support of the company. You align yourself with anyone who feels as you do and oppose those who do not. Simple "tribal" behavior.
However, such "tribal" behavior as "chest beating" amongst primates, is usually an activity of the young apes. The older apes have discovered that such thumping only hurts their chest and does nothing to the supposed enemy.
That leads me to believe that you must be very young and immature. And your name calling is stictly elementary school stuff.
You accuse me of pumping a .0001 stock that already has over 50,000 investors. Quite frankly, my wishes would be for folks to sell so that we can get the OS down to a reasonable level, and can go on with mining operations unimpeded.
Now, you want me to share what I KNOW about the company with folks here. Well, if I did that, my sources of facts would dry up. People who really know about this company, don't want it put out yet, and I respect their wishes.
And should we ever meet, and you are tempted to "smack me just for drill", please be aware that I wasn't always a white collar crime detective, I spent many years working in the ghetto as a tactical enforcement officer. Other young and inexperienced folks thought they might try the same thing. There's one of those "facts" that you wanted me to share.
IP: Logged |
quote:"So you say you have the evidence of Urban's bad faith with the shareholders? What you have is the "one-sided" stack of papers distributed by the SEC in their investigation of CMKX. Do they look bad for Urban and company? You bet, they were gathered by a government organization bent on accumulating and placing the worst light possible on a company. That's their job. Stoecklein's job is/was to show the other side, and for whatever reason, he chose not to. And I suspect that his reasons were proper and judicious."
Now this one statement shows how the cult refuses reality. CMKX had a chance to show there side. Trials or hearings aren't one sided. Both sides are given equal chances to represent themselves. And there is no conspiracy to stop CMKX from proving there side. This is America not Russia. CMKX has been given numerous opportunities to prove that the government was wrong and not only haven't they, they continue by still not filing. If CMKX was for real and not hiding information it doesn't take 8 months to file an audit. And according to UC they been trying for 2 years. Thats not trying, thats excuses while not filing. Because if you really want to file, you give the accountants the paperwork they need, period.
You have one officer taking the fifth. The other claiming he knows nothing, Auditors quiting because they can't get anything and even one that claims wrong doings and was fired for making the company file a 8-K on it. Yeah I see how this can look one sided for someone who refuses to look at the other side without those rose colored glasses on.
-------------------- Invest with your brain not with your heart.
IP: Logged |
posted
Ric they were charged with failing to file. That's all. They have filed their responses to the charges and it is now up to the Commission to rule whether the ALJ was correct in her findings, prior to the case going to a Federal Appeals Ct., where they stand a chance of having a neutral judge review the case. It does us little good to attempt to try the case on message boards.
But it is apparent to all, that the SEC has nothing on UC, or the company, other than failure to file.
After at least a year of investigation, starting with USCA last year, CMKX has been thoroughly investigated and not one single criminal or civil charge has been leveled against anyone, other than a simple administrative charge of failing to file. And even that one is weak at best.
IP: Logged |
posted
That leads me to believe that you must be very young and immature. And your name calling is stictly elementary school stuff.
You accuse me of pumping a .0001 stock that already has over 50,000 investors. Quite frankly, my wishes would be for folks to sell so that we can get the OS down to a reasonable level, and can go on with mining operations unimpeded.
Now, you want me to share what I KNOW about the company with folks here. Well, if I did that, my sources of facts would dry up. People who really know about this company, don't want it put out yet, and I respect their wishes.
And should we ever meet, and you are tempted to "smack me just for drill", please be aware that I wasn't always a white collar crime detective, I spent many years working in the ghetto as a tactical enforcement officer. Other young and inexperienced folks thought they might try the same thing. There's one of those "facts" that you wanted me to share.
I/m 62, and in fairly good shape. And I dont give a damn if you were a fuzz or not. You're still full of horsechit. Oh, and you're not much of a psychologist either. Monkeys?? HA ha..
-------------------- If I give you bad information, please feel free to sue me. I have nothing left anyway. Ed
IP: Logged |
posted
"You accuse me of pumping a .0001 stock that already has over 50,000 investors. Quite frankly, my wishes would be for folks to sell so that we can get the OS down to a reasonable level, and can go on with mining operations unimpeded. "
explain how ppl selling reduces the o/s? the company is not buying back anything. ppl selling does nothing to the o/s. it does drop the pps not that the pps dropping would have any meaning, its in the 5th digit now.
"After at least a year of investigation, starting with USCA last year, CMKX has been thoroughly investigated and not one single criminal or civil charge has been leveled against anyone, other than a simple administrative charge of failing to file. And even that one is weak at best. "
i guess hakala stating she left the illegal trading proof at home is meaningless. once revoked i'm betting criminal charges will be leveled. weak at best???? they still haven't filed, they can't keep an auditor. they have no books to audit. they lied a number of times about filing. they lied to quit filing. you call that weak? just what would be a strong case in your mind?
-------------------- "keep your stick on the ice & your cup firmly in place"
IP: Logged |
posted
What amazes me bill is that legal claims to be a retired cop. I mean there are cases everyday made by police and prosecutors that are a lot weaker then this. He refuses to look at evidence but rather believe theories. A cop doesn't think that way from all I know and worked with. And being in the military police if I brought someone to Captains mast with this much evidence then it would be a court martial for sure. I really starting to wonder if its true and if it was then it had to be a desk job.
-------------------- Invest with your brain not with your heart.
IP: Logged |
Topic Closed
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
Printer-friendly view of this topic
