posted
Someone may want to inform Debi there is a difference between registering a company with a state and registering to be a public company with the SEC. The biggest problem most of these people have is not understanding what they are talking about. It doesn't matter if they do roll CMKX into CIM. They would have to file the financials with the SEC before the SEC would allow registration of CIM as a public traded company.
Sure CIM could be a public traded company. All they have to do if they roll CMKX into it is file all the financials for the company. Then apply for registration. Even the SEC said in there brief for CMKX. They said, if revoked and CMKX filed all they have to do is reapply for registration just like every other company. Geeze
WWJDthrume
Super Administrator
Posts: 764 Registered: 10/12/2004 Member Is Offline
posted on 7/1/2005 at 11:54 AM
This just keeps getting better. Amazing coincidence that SGGM would be suspended until the judge makes her decision. Hmmmmm.
USCA was suspended when good news was to be announced in October.
SGGM suspended so a door can close on merging there?
CIM registered recently. Can they suspend them before they start?
The Canadian companies that are CMKX related like Pine Channel or other? Will they be suspended in Canada? Or is Canada less corrupt than the US (at least in the market?)
IMO-Debi
What a ride!!! And we haven't even left the station yet. Anyone else have motion sickness?
IMO-Debi
[ July 02, 2005, 02:45: Message edited by: Ric ]
-------------------- Invest with your brain not with your heart.
IP: Logged |
posted
I also think its funny that they really believe this is an evil conspiracy by the SEC. They really don't understand why the SEC is revoking CMKX and going after SGGM. This was all started when they investigated USCA and found problems. CMKX filed a false form 15 and should have been filing. By not filing the investing public has no way to know if CMKX is telling the truth. Whether you want to have blind faith in the company is not the SEC's fault. Also SGGM is not filing when they suppose to and the same outcome with them. Of course they are going to do litagation on these companies. Why wait till now. They just found it out while investigating another scam. Its not the SEC's fault that scams seem to pal around together. Or be in the family for that matter. And if you would lay the koolaid down for a minute you would see it.
-------------------- Invest with your brain not with your heart.
IP: Logged |
posted
Also you may want to remind Debi that CMKX was suspended from trading in Sask. long before SEC halted CMKX. So theres her answer about Canada. So parts of Canada seems not to have trouble halting CMKX for illegal selling of shares.
-------------------- Invest with your brain not with your heart.
IP: Logged |
posted
Okay, we need some more levity again.... It's not UC secret life.. But this is a true story and fits this cmkx whacked out saga. I got the tip from my friend who I just found out as diagnosed as schizo manic depressed and and says he talks to God. But he got a unrelated company tip from his friend at work from Pakistan. God didn't offer any stock advise at that time. Ironically, my friend cyphers coded names from some Jewish Torah code book and gave me CMKX as well. Not too long after that, one of cmkx direct subsidies 'SGGM' went from .0001 to .98 in a two week span last summer. Do the math, amazing. Run the symbol, and check the charts from 1-04 to 12-04. I might as well throw darts at the newspaper. This is a true story... honest... and it just keeps getting weirder about my poor friend. Maybe some other time about him
-------------------- Eagles may soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines....
IP: Logged |
posted
SGGM was just reinstated at Nev SOS on July 19, 2004. Not even a year old yet and already being targeted by the SEC. In the old days we called that "Selective Enforcement".
IP: Logged |
Its called one scam investing in another scam investing in another scam like a house of cards falling down when one card was messed with. So when they looked at one the other came to light. This all started with USCA. If they weren't busted maybe none of this would have happened. Maybe UC shouldn't have taken the 5th when questioned during the USCA investigation or CMKX's for that matter.
-------------------- Invest with your brain not with your heart.
IP: Logged |
posted
By: stockshockers4 02 Jul 2005, 10:39 AM EDT Msg. 2341 of 2341 (This msg. is a reply to 2340 by silverbulletny1.) Jump to msg. #
so SGGMs new CEO Haseltine was involved in other penny scams that were revoked before?
By: silverbulletny1 02 Jul 2005, 08:32 AM EDT Msg. 2340 of 2340 (Msg. is a reply to by None.) Seems Judge Murray & Haseltine bumped heads again,
APPEARANCES: William B. Haseltine for Eye Cash Networks, Inc.
Eye Cash, a Nevada corporation, registered its equity securities with the Commission on October 8, 1993, under the name of Leggoons, Inc., pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act. (Declaration at 1, Declaration Ex. 1.) On March 16, 1999, the Commission obtained a permanent injunction against Eye Cash in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, which enjoined Eye Cash from, among other things, future violations of Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act by, for example, failing to file timely periodic reports with the Commission. Despite being permanently enjoined from further Section 13(a) violations, Eye Cash failed to file its annual reports for 2002 and 2003 and its quarterly reports for 2003. (Declaration Ex. 3.) On June 8, 2004, the Commission issued an order suspending trading in the stock of Eye Cash for ten days because there was a lack of current, accurate information concerning Eye Cash's securities. (Declaration Ex. 4.) Eye Cash's answer "admits [to] the allegations in the [OIP] in that certain recent filings have not been made that are required by the Securities Exchange Act," and that it "has been dormant for the past year, and has neither conducted any business nor had access to any capital. Therefore, the filings could not be made on a timely basis." (Eye Cash Answer at 1.) An attestation by the Commission's Records Officer dated August 16, 2004, states that "Eyecashnetworks, Inc. f/k/a eConnect and Betting, Inc." has not filed annual reports on Form 10-KSB for 2002 or 2003 or quarterly reports on Form 10-QSB for the three quarters ending March 31, 2003, June 30, 2003, and September 30, 2003. (Declaration Ex. 3.)
Based on these undisputed facts, I find the allegations in the OIP to be true. Eye Cash violated Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act, Rules 13a-1 and 13a-13, and the permanent injunction enjoining it under its previous name, Betting, Inc., from being delinquent in making required filings with the Commission. SEC v. Betting, Inc., Civil Action No. 99-CV-0621 (D.D.C. Mar. 16, 1999). (Declaration at 1, Declaration Ex. 2.)
__________________ Brenda P. Murray Chief Administrative Law Judge
-------------------- Invest with your brain not with your heart.
IP: Logged |
posted
Hey UpMan, how's your buddy poot poot, and what was your other friend's name, bouse bouse or someting like that? You're not on good terms with those guys anymore? I thought you three were famous friends from way back ??? Course you probably hung out with, nutsac, ballicker, and goforchit at one time too.
-------------------- A million seconds is 13 days. A billion seconds is 31 years.
IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Upside: Posted by Wallace #1
quote:Hey, fartface, what's that supposed to mean? LOL
Nothing at all. Just proud of the company I keep. Aren't you proud to be on an even keel with Will?
You saw what that clown, will, posted in answer to you and you have the nerve to insult me by suggesting I am on an even keel with him? That guy's keel is all up and down his backside. You are a damn instigator! LOL
IP: Logged |
posted
Will, Bous Bous and Poot Poot were good guys/gals. As are Wallace, Legal, Ric, Doc, Ed, Bill, Dwman, Stockster, and anyone else I've forgotten. You on the other hand, defy description.
IP: Logged |
posted
bous bous, that's it. No problem, Upman, I will be the anti-Christ of the CMKX thread. The lions ate the Chrisstians here, but there's still a couple around, so someone has to keep it balanced. Fencesitters don't get the job done.
-------------------- A million seconds is 13 days. A billion seconds is 31 years.
IP: Logged |
posted
Watching this about that little girl found today. I think this country needs to get a little balls to them and at least castrate these perverts. If he killed that boy, him and that monster that killed that little girl in Florida and others like them should die painfully. I would prefer myself that they build a huge collisium and have national coverage. Have half starved lions or tigers loose with obsticles course to make it interesting. Make it primetime, not pay per view because we want these lowlifes to see what will happen to them if they do something like this. Have Vegas give odds on how long they can hold out before the tigers kills them.
-------------------- Invest with your brain not with your heart.
IP: Logged |
posted
i agree ric but i'd rather have each limb attached to an elephant. then 1 at a time have a limb detached. at some point we need to quit letting these monsters off easy. they destroy lives of the young even those that live. tho if let loose in genral population in the worst prisons they do get what they deserve for however long they survive. only most end up in protective custody in prison.
-------------------- "keep your stick on the ice & your cup firmly in place"
IP: Logged |
posted
legal odds are SGGM is not shorted. the last know o/s was 14,487,159 but as we known the a/s is 900 billion, 200 billion of which was to go to cmkx. with that o/s 725K would put it on the SHO list. the o/s is not 14 million any more. its at least 25 million & probably much higher. about 6 weeks ago when news hit about signing a deal for some platinum claims i jumped in fast figuring a serious run would happen. i got out a bit over even because from watching the trades it was easy to see the dilution. i watched a few days & the dilution keep going. back when the CMKX deal hit & it ran, the volume was nothing like 6 weeks ago. there were no shares available so the pps went crazy, this time there were more then enough shares to go around. if it was naked shorting causing this mm's would have first let the pps run some so that they could profit more. this is the problem with the SHO list & non-reporting companies. there is no way to know if it should be there. with SGGM just raising the o/s to 16 million would put it on the SHO list unless the o/s increase is reported.
-------------------- "keep your stick on the ice & your cup firmly in place"
IP: Logged |
posted
as for the halt they never filed a form 15 to stop reporting thus they were required to continue reporting. giving cmkx $10 million in cash say they could afford to report. as has been pointed out the SEC probaly noticed when it started investigating USCA & CMKX. chances are they have a better defence because with a 14 million o/s & no business there had to be less then 300 shareholders, thus they had the right to file a form 15. if they kept the books up right they can probably get away with a few of the latest filings & a form 15 for a few yrs. a deal could be arranged.
-------------------- "keep your stick on the ice & your cup firmly in place"
IP: Logged |
posted
i dont think so ed, too soon after the final briefs. she probably didn't read everything till everything was filed & reading it, checking the laws & past rulings that apply will take at least a week. my guess is between the 12th & the 15th.
-------------------- "keep your stick on the ice & your cup firmly in place"
IP: Logged |
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
Printer-friendly view of this topic
