posted
Wallace#1Member posted March 10, 2004 20:37 Hippo - PaulI take it NITE and JEFF are certain MM's. How do you know their ID's? How do you know which stock(s) a MM is handling? How do you know how exactly how many shares are traded each time whether at a lower, equal or higher price? Sure would appreciate an explanation of each!!! [This message has been edited by Wallace#1 (edited March 10, 2004).] Wallace#1Member posted June 10, 2004 23:28 Upside, your .0009 seems low to me. Wouldn't surprise me if it goes to between .001/.002. Remember, even small diamonds can be profitably used for industrial purposes. Wallace#1Member posted June 18, 2004 21:19 Keith, WOW!!! That chart looks fantastic!!! Have you checked out the fundamentals at all? If not, let me know, and I will. By the way, I haven't seen any of Gregdogg's postings lately, have you? I know Glass is probably involved in his move. There seem to be an awful lot of "strange" new people on the "Under .10" group. Nothing like what we have been accustomed to. Dave -Somewhere back on that CMKX thread you had a question for me. Be glad to answer it here. [This message has been edited by Wallace#1 (edited June 18, 2004).] CHIMAN34Member posted June 19, 2004 13:05 Hi Wallace. You had said "I just cancelled my BUY for 4 mil shs at .0004 and changed it to 10 mil at .0001." I asked if you really thought it would drop that far again? This is for the cmkx question I had. ThanksDave
Question for something that is such a scam, why would you buy 10mil shares @ .0001 Wallace#1Member posted June 27, 2004 14:52 For those of you who are convinced that CMKX is naked shorted, you may find the fact that Universal Express (USXP) has filed a "Memorandum" with the SEC about naked shorting by the MMs and the SEC doing nothing about it. Just do a search using Universal Express, SEC, Memorandum. Based upon that, CMKX may very well be naked shorted. However, that will do more damage than good to shareholders. Initially (if true), there may be a rise in CMKX share price with MMs trying to cover. In the long run, all will lose out. This does not negate my opinion that people are being misled by UC, Melvin and others at CMKX. They may be using the naked shorting as a diversion. [This message has been edited by Wallace#1 (edited June 27, 2004).] [This message has been edited by Wallace#1 (edited June 27, 2004).] [This message has been edited by Wallace#1 (edited June 27, 2004).] Amazing how you act like you know so much , but in March you seemed clueless about MM’s Wallace#1Member posted July 28, 2004 15:46 krose, You might try to follow some of the recommendations (not just the PRs) of people like Glassman and Dardadog, among others.I don't post tips because of bad experiences on the CMKX thread. By the way, would not recommend CMKX...too much confusion and too many unknowns surrounding it. -------------------------------------------Also a lot of strange people on that thread that think they know a lot of stocks and do nothing but pump it...might be worth your while to check it out for that reason only. After going through your post I have come to the conclusion that you are trying to say you have all of this knowledge, when in reality you just started doing this and know nothing of penny stocks. Your contribution has been nothing and for someone that doesn’t believe in this stock, fine we get the point! You don’t like it, but honestly the majority of your posts are about CMKX why the hell do you spend so much time here? It makes no sense. Now thanks to you and others like you, good people have left this site. “Allstocks” I am really sorry to see that you have not gotten rid of Wallace, he has been of no aid to anyone and it is obvious that he is here just to bash this stock and people invested in it. With that, I will be leaving this site and going to another board for good . Thanks Wallace, and others for making good people leave.
posted
As a lurker most of the time, I must say that I too am tired of all the excess nonsence that goes on here in this thread. I have also started to look elsewhere for my CMKX information. When I started with this board, it was excellent to read the discussion between members. That discussion has turned into bickering between members and has totally turned me off. The image I had of Allstocks has changed within the last 6-8 months. I'm just dissapointed it has turned out to be like other boards. This one use to be different.
IP: Logged |
Had they done there 'job' and gotten rid of the problem people, NO ONE owuld be leaving this site... People who have left or Stopped posting because of Wallace and the bashers on CMKX Thread:
1. Noah -Left Completely 2. WWJD/Debi-Left Completely 3. JBCak47 - Lurk mode, stopped posting 4. Money Penny - Left Completely or stopped posting. 5. Trading Wizard - Stopped posting, luker. 6. Tammie- Left site 7. FASTRACKMO- Leaving site 8. SKIPPY- Used the site for a year, now is leaving...
Not to mention a few others... Tammie I beleive sold because of Wallace and Co...
Again, these six or seven listed people, and others may not mean anything in the long run, however Allstocks relies on people posting to it...
Again, Allstocks chose not to do anything about the group of bashers, so Noah, WWJD, and many others have decided to leave...
I bet if no one posted, and we all sent messages to Bob Frey saying if you don't get rid of Wallace, we will no longer post, which means A LOT less trafic for Allstocks... I bet Wallace would be gone...
This site use to be THE BEST STOCK forum...
It is very sad that the management has left a group of bashers run everyone off their site. I guess when no one clicks on the add's and they see traffic is slow, maybe they will get a clue.
-John-
[This message has been edited by JBCak47 (edited September 29, 2004).]
posted
Allstocks I am asking that Wallace#1 be removed and banned from this site. If no action is taken with Wallace#1, and his other basher buddies I will permanently leave Allstocks. I now ask that everyone here that agrees with this would say so, and I would also ask that we refrain from posting until we get our response.
posted
What amazes me about this stock is how *little* evidence is needed to convince most people in here that it is the stock play of a lifetime (like they'll get rich and buy an island) and how *much* is needed to convince said shareholders to think it is the worst play, if not a scam. When you play in the penny stock world, it should work exactly the opposite way. Thats all wallace and co. are saying. I mean take a look at Peter Leeds. He is a widely reknowned penny stock researcher with a proven track record and preaches essentially the exact same thing. If there was irrefutable evidence that this stock was a scam, I have a feeling half if not more would still try to make the buy and hold case. This case has all the earmarks of inexperienced investors mixed in with emotion -- a losing combination.
[This message has been edited by trgfunds (edited September 29, 2004).]
posted
"Thats all wallace and co. are saying. " No actually he is saying A LOT more, I am sorry you missed it. I don't know how you couldn't...
About three of the 'longs' on here and about half a dozen other people want Wallace Gone... Those three 'Longs' were valuable assests, who have left because of Wallace and what he has done to this board...
Again, Get rid of one or two of the known bashers OR let a dozen of your biggest posters go else where???
Again, this site needs traffic and Wallace and Co. has been driving them away... Now there is a financial reason to get rid of Wallace, as well as the dozen reasons, err, members who also want him and his 'knowledge' gone...
Let us get emotional with our stock, why do you or anyone care what we do? If we lose the house, let us worry about that...
posted
trgfunds, your post was right on the money. Think CMKX will be racing next year? Where will the $$ come from? The CMKX "advertising" budget? How about some info on the company drilling budgets??
IP: Logged |
posted
I am also leaving this board because there is no one left but Wallace and his crew posting.How any one can post here day and night without even owning this is beyond me.Talk about beating a dead horse.Anyway I was a member here for a year and half, mostly lurking but sometimes posting.But I have grown tired of all the BS posts that have absolutly no information just schoolyard b!tching.Everything was great til Wally showed up and started to spread his cancer.See ya
IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by JBCak47: "Thats all wallace and co. are saying. " No actually he is saying A LOT more, I am sorry you missed it. I don't know how you couldn't...
About three of the 'longs' on here and about half a dozen other people want Wallace Gone... Those three 'Longs' were valuable assests, who have left because of Wallace and what he has done to this board...
Again, Get rid of one or two of the known bashers OR let a dozen of your biggest posters go else where???
Again, this site needs traffic and Wallace and Co. has been driving them away... Now there is a financial reason to get rid of Wallace, as well as the dozen reasons, err, members who also want him and his 'knowledge' gone...
Let us get emotional with our stock, why do you or anyone care what we do? If we lose the house, let us worry about that...
I was originally referring to the recent comment made and link posted to the allstocks penny stock warning. Granted, it isn't my problem if you lose money, but the bigger picture involves the general education of the investing community, particularly those who see forums like this and buy based on it. I can tell you this. A newbie who finds any CMKX forum gets a hugely positive impression right off the bat. If you follow the history in chronological order people start talking about how many islands they'll buy before any real DD is posted. If bashing were a problem that wouldn't be the case.
With regard to people leaving the site because of them, I say you choose whether or not to let it bother you. I question how valuable longs really are with a stock like CMKX. CMKX is *stagnant*. Everything they have to say is repetitive. We know why they bought. We know why they're holding. They'd risk it all in hopes of changing their lives forever, yada yada. Its akin to winning the lottery. If this situation were unique, we wouldn't need longs telling us what they heard or read. We would have the company or CEO telling us first hand.
I suggest we all do this: webmaster@allstocks.comDear Allstocks,
Dear Allstocks,
I suggest you go check out the CMKX Thread. Many of us (CMKX Shareholders) are getting tired of what Wallace#1 has been doing on that thread.
Many of us are a step away from mutiny. There have been over nine members who have stopped posting or have left entirely. Two of those were very good members, Noah and WWJD/Debi.
Your site needs people like them and us in order to survive. You need traffic and we provide that traffic. The 'better' the enviorment, the more people will post, and the more traffic goes to your site.
Wallace#1 has been destroying that. I suggest you think long and hard about him. He has driven away , or is ABOUT to drive away over ten people...
Remember, your site needs traffic and if he is driving them away, well, I don't have to tell you what happens.
Your site is about to lose MANY of it's good posters and topic starters... Is 'Wallace#1' really worth it?
Either he (He is the NUMBER ONE trouble maker) goes or we all go...
posted
I second the letter posted by JBCAK47. Wallace #1 is doing a great dis-service to the members of Allstocks with his postings.
Wallace #1 needs to GO!!!!!!!!!
This will be my last post in CMKX unless he is removed. I have had my fill with his nonsense. ------------------ "If We Agree To Disagree, Then We Can Remain friends"
[This message has been edited by Doctoall (edited September 29, 2004).]
posted
I wonder why the allstocks admin just came in here strange. Thank you wallace for your positive picks. and some of the warning signs in the link seem to be close to cmkx I think it is because it is a pink stock and most pink sheets stocks could be close also that is why I am holding my shares with cmkx and not buying more as for the two that you said are good I agree with you and they are at a price that would be out of my range to take on. So technicaly you are saying one positive thing about cmkx. the small amount of shares we are getting from UCAD could be worth something holding on to. I hope you are wrong about cmkx you do have some valid points.
IP: Logged |
And these are some of the people I took an oath to protect when I served my country? What a PITY! What a WASTE!
Guess it hit a nerve when you saw that so much on that Allstocks site about stock frauds was specifically identical to CMKX? And not one of you, uncluding Upside, had the guts to post the similarities? Wonder why? Too accurate? "Hit the nail on the head"? Cannot have it all the ways, Up - down, back, forth, in, out, left and right!
As far as this thread is concerned, one of the worst things anyone could have done was pussy foot around about CMKX. Instead, a supposed proponent against CMKX, chose not to "call a spade a spade". Never took a real stand one way or another, but sure as hell enjoyed himself when the jackals came slinking around. What a disservice!
As soon as a certain person who was banned three times came back, it started all over again. Now, that very same person wants posters to go elsewhere? Now that very same person thinks he has the credibility to suggest that someone else be banned? Each and every person he named above thought he was FUNNY? Sure, as long as it was not directed at you, but at someone else's expense! He was the most foul and vile poster I have ever seen on any thread...and he wants to become a Public Administrator? Already, I feel sorry for the public with which he may one day be in contact. Sad, sad, very sad! Downright disgusting!
Christ!!!!!!!
[This message has been edited by Wallace#1 (edited September 29, 2004).]
posted
i think a few have seen my name posting in here for the last 6 months...wallce has every right to post as he see's fit until it goes into name calling. byrd and a few other also go into the name calling. when someone has made a decision about a stock or anything for that matter and someone else is doing everything but calling them a fool for that decision it hurts and then the anger arises. it doesn't hurt or bother you if you believe in yourself or have the ability to take criticism sometimes the criticism is wrong or overboard. in stocks this happens when a person either believes as CMKXer's do this is the stock play of a lifetime or when someone falls in love with a stock. as anyone will tell you both are bad moves in the pennies & even worse in the pinks. i'm not defending wallace & friends as a lot of their posts are way negitive but the positive ppl are way to positive not allowing the mostly bad info known about cmkx to sink in. this cmkx thread has been hurt but its as much the positive ppls fault as the negitives. personally i'm not going anywhere because i could careless what either group says both just make me laugh. this stock is like bush supporters vs. kerry supporters way to much hate and all over a stock!?!?!?
IP: Logged |
quote:And not one of you, uncluding Upside, had the guts to post the similarities? Wonder why? Too accurate? "Hit the nail on the head"? Cannot have it all the ways, Up - down, back, forth, in, out, left and right!
As far as this thread is concerned, one of the worst things anyone could have done was pussy foot around about CMKX. Instead, an outspoken proponent against CMKX, chose not to "call a spade a spade". Never took a real stand one way or another, but sure as hell enjoyed himself when the jackals came slinking around. What a disservice!
Wallace, I'll respond to you one last time. To begin with, there is no need to point out the similarities between the stock fraud article and CMKX. A link was provided and anyone who so desired could click on it and see the similarities for themselves. It's not my job to take peoples hands and go over each point with them, that would be demeaning. You seem to delight in belittling people, I do not. As far as pussy footing around on the issue, please do a little dd on your own post. Go back and re-read this topic from its origin, started by CashCowMoo. My position on this stock has not changed, there is just no need for me to post it 5 - 6 times a day nor to respond to one of your many challanges. Why don't you ask yourself why so many called for you to be banned today. Do you really think it's because you hold a negative view of this stock? Better think that one through again. Lastly, regarding the outcry for your banning and the "jackal" comment, I just want you to know that when it all started, I was probably the only one here who sent an e-mail to Bob Frey stating that in my opinion you had done nothing to warrant being banned. While I don't agree with your methods, this is a forum where free speech (within certain guidlines) should prevail. Good day sir.
Someone who shall remain nameless to protect his reputation just posted:
{"I'm worried about owning a stock where people due their DD at racetracks by overhearing drunken fools talk about how rich they're going to be."} WELL GET OVER IT !!
BE THAT AS IT MAY, THAT NEITHER HAS NOR WILL HAVE ANYTHING TO DO WITH MINERAL CLAIMS VALUES IN THE BILLIONS SELLING FOR .0003
Even though you are an extremely conservative kind of person, YOU NEED TO PUT ASIDE ALL YOUR DOUBTS AND BUY IMMEDIATELY AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE.
Yes there is lots of negative crap that could easily deter anybody who is used to INVESTING and has never had much appetite for the RISK of SPECULATION on a penny or SUB-PENNY stock.
HOWEVER, YOU MERELY HAVE TO FOCUS ON THE POSITVE PROBABILITIES: Here are the first 15 that leap to my mind - THERE ARE MANY MORE! (all documentation in links below)
1) What is the probablity that D Roger Glenn, who has ONLY Fortune 500 companies for clients would represent a scam? - ZERO ! !
2) What is the probability that CMKX is OVER-valued given the cash flow currently being generated by both Junia Mining (GEMM.ob) from the Yellow River GOLD mine AND by El Capitan (ECPN.ob) from its 17 MILLION tons of IRON ORE per year shipped to the LARGEST STEEL PRODUCER IN CHINA? - ZERO ! !
3) CMKX INTEREST IN GEMM ALONE IMHO WORTH .0006 TO .001 TWICE, MAYBE 3 x, THE CURRENT CMKX BUY PRICE
4) CMKX INTEREST IN ECPN ALONE IMHO WORTH .0006 TO .001 TWICE, MAYBE 3 x, THE CURRENT CMKX BUY PRICE
GEMM & ECPN ARE THE CASH COWS WITHOUT ANY - ZERO - DIAMONDS! !
5) What is the probability that BOTH Kensington / DeBeers AND Shore Gold can pull out good qualaity jewelry grade diamonds less than 6 miles away (each in different directions) from the current cmkx drill site, which is somewhere close to the center of a GIANT KIMBERLIGHT MUSHROOM OREO DEPOSIT OF APPROXIMATLY 8 X 5 MILES IN SIZE (THE "HEAD" OF THE "MUSHROOM"), and that CMKX will not find any diamonds there? - IMHO, ZERO ! ! http://questfordiamonds.com/research/topic5a.htm
6) What is the probabilty that CMKX will find NOTHING on ANY of its TWO MILLION ACRES of Mineral Claims that will add valaue to the current PPS of .0003 ? - ZERO ! !
Kensington / DeBeers is color keyed SKY BLUE Shore Gold is color keyed OLIVE GREEN
7) What is the probability that the repair of the share structure by the resolution of the huge naked short position in CMKX will not POSITIVELY IMPACT the CMKX PPS? - ZERO !!
8) What is the probability that this (shorts covering, structure being repaired) is NOT currently happening, since the daily volume in billions, since dumping would drive the ppS down, AND SINCE BOTH THE CHAIKEN MINEY FLOW AND ACCUMULATION LINE T A INDICATORS CLEARLY SHOW INCREDIBLE BUYING / ACCUMULATION (and NOT selling /distribution /dumping) ? - ZERO ! ! http://tinyurl.com/4gamw
9) What is the probability that the CMKX will not go significantly higher than .0003 once D Roger Glenn gets CMKX FULLY REPORTING AGAIN and Listed AT LEAST on the OTC (as on .ob vs an .pk stock) - ZERO ! !
10) What is the probability that the PPS has any downside on the news of the sale of mineral rights for other types of deposits to other companies? - ZERO ! !
11) What is the probability that the PPS will not experience a HUGE RUN just as soon as the news that GOOD QUALITY DIAMONDS HAVE BEEN DISCOVERED ? - ZERO ! !
12) What is the probability that the PPS will Not go UP on news that CMKX has merged or taken over / bought out any of its J V Partners; or UCAD ? - ZERO ! !
13) What is the probability that CMKX will have insufficient funds available to actually mine anything they want to get out of the ground, in light of MULTIPLE DOZENS OF MILLIONS of DOLLARS ALREADY thrown at CMKX from UCAD, SGGM, the BRITISH Investment Group (BTW, that will start trading TOMORROW, THRS SEPT 30 on London Exchange!) ? - ZERO ! !
14) What is the probability that it is of NO significance that CMKX is ALREADY in a CONTRACTUAL PARTNERSHIP RELATIONSHIP with Rick Kusmirsky, who has VAST experience mining URANIUM for Cameco and one of the largest mining consortiums in the world - The Lundin Group, owned by Adolf Lundin? - ZERO ! !
15) What is the probability that if CMKX needed even more money, that it could not get it as easily as telephoning the CEO of the Israeli company DGI, which desperately wants to acquire diamond producing assetts and is on record as having TWO BILLION US DOLLARS at its disposal to do so? - ZERO ! !
JUST BECAUSE THE CHICKS THAT HANG OUT AT BARS MAY NOT BE THE KIND THAT YOU'D WANT TO TAKE HOME TO MOTHER DOES NOT MEAN THAT THERE ARE NOT PLENTY OF FISH IN THE SEA SHE WOULD LOVE TO SEE YOU WITH!
WHY WOULD YOU LET A FEW DRUNKEN IDIOT NEWBIE INVESTORS KEEP YOU AWAY FROM THE GREATEST PENNY STOCK OPPORTUNITY OF ALL TIME?
WHY LET THE IDIOCY OF OTHERS ECLIPSE THE TREMENDOUS UNDER-VAALUATION OF THE MULTIPLE FUNDAMENTAL REASONS FOR OWNING THIS STOCK?
WHY RISK MISSING OUT ON THE GREATEST SHARE PRICE EXPLOSION OF A LIFETIME - THE ERUPTION OF MOUNT SAINT HELEN'S ?
OR VESUVIOUS?
OR CRACKATOA ?
I can not believe that you do not see the ABSOLUTELY STUPENDOUS FREE MONEY OPPORTUNITY HERE if you have taken just TWO HOURS to read ANYTHING in either
If you do not find ANY TWO OR THREE reasons from the 15 above BOTH SUFFICIENT AND COMPELLING ENOUGH TO BUY CMKX ASAP, then IMHO either you lack rudimantary reading &/or comprehension skills.
Absolutely DUMBFOUNDED at the perception on CMKX by any not yet long & HOLDING FA$T,
jawz_2020
[This message has been edited by Allstocks (edited September 30, 2004).]
posted
Martha...i'm not bashing but the post you pasted there is why ppl that are negitive go crazy about this stock...i'm not in anyway saying don't post things like that, i'm glad you did, i get a good laugh reading that stuff but anyone that knows anything about the stock market knows no stock with a 800 billion o/s is going to soar even if everything in that post came true and buying out ucad is even a bigger dream the r/s that would need to happen for that would turn 1,000,000 shares into about 200 shares. i'm not saying cmkx won't do its shareholders well if they hold long term but its not a lottery ticket.
IP: Logged |
"9) What is the probability that the CMKX will not go significantly higher than .0003 once D Roger Glenn gets CMKX FULLY REPORTING AGAIN and Listed AT LEAST on the OTC (as on .ob vs an .pk stock) - ZERO ! ! "
Along with:
Share structure Sample reporting Progress of becoming a reporting Co.
Resolve those issues, and you might be on your way to something other than .0003.
posted
My stance on CMKX hasn't ever wavered.High risk/high reward.
I bought in @ .0001 when alot of people were down on it hard.Glad I did too.1/2 my 6 mill. shares are free.Coulda woulda shoulda they all might have been.As much as people want to push or pull CMKX to me it's still high risk high reward.Just how I like it.
Will,you still watching Plasticon(was wkdh? Thanks for the tip buddy.
[This message has been edited by highwaychild (edited September 29, 2004).]
posted
Wait a minute hold the presses. That allstock warning said that if a company does not report to the sec stay away I thought all pink sheet stocks dont have reports with the sec. It also says that if a company says they are planning to be fully reporting to stay away. SO QUESTION HAS A COMPANY THAT TURNED FROM NON REPORTING TO FULL REPORTING STATUS EVER NOT STATED THEY WERE GOING TO BEFORE HAND?? LETS SAY FOR EXAMPLE RIGHT NOW MICROSOFT IS NON REPORTING AND THEY RELEASE A PRESS RELEASE THAT THEY ARE GOING TO BE FULLY REPORTING BY THE END OF THE YEAR. RIGHT NOW THEY ARE A PINK SHEET STOCK. I am supposed to stay away. end of the year comes they are fully reporting as stated in their press release. oops question on press releases As far as I know any press releases aside from future goals and forward looking things info that is stated as a fact would have to be true. like in a press release i state I have 5 corvettes. If I actually only had 2 and it was verified to be as such I could be liable big time. So how does a company with thousands of shareholders be able to get away with a lie in a pr. I would think at least a couple would research and find out if it was false post it everywhere and report the offences to the proper authorities sec. Also Why would a lawyer that represents Legit companies waste his time with one that was a scam. If I was a lawyer and most of my clients were upstanding I would not want to tarnish my image representing a company that was a scam and it would take something of importance and crediblity for me to represent a company who has 800 billion shares worth .0003 Maybe you say Im doing for the money I think I rather be paid by a company that wont destroy all cred I have. Point is that if Roger Glenn is representing a company that is stealing from 10s of thousands of people out of their money that would be the stupidest thing anyone could possibly do. He would become so well known for being so unethical It is impossible to fathom. He would not only ruin his reputation but that of the entire lawfirm that he represents and if anyone who invests in stocks ever saw his name or the lawfirms name involved I think they would stay away. So point is I think this is not a scam it would be just too foolish to have a scam on this scale.
IP: Logged |
posted
Sdrobert-You are exactly right. Roger Glenn has no reason to risk his reputation to work with CMKX if they are in any way scamming people. If on the other hand they are doing what they said they will do, have diamonds like their nearby neighbors (fairly likely given the geology of the area), and are naked shorted and being dogged by offshore hedge funds; then he has a chance to make the 42,000 shareholders very happy when he manages to bring them from the brink of death to a fully reporting company on the AMEX with the naked short position finally gone. If that happens he will be more famous and his already great reputation will increase to legend status.
IP: Logged |
I won't pick apart that whole post with the 15 so-called reasons to buy in or stay with CMKX, just a couple for now.
You wrote or reposted: Yes there is lots of negative crap that could easily deter anybody who is used to INVESTING and has never had much appetite for the RISK of SPECULATION on a penny or SUB-PENNY stock.
A: "Investing" is one thing. "Risk/speculation on a penny stock is little more than gambling.
1) What is the probablity that D Roger Glenn, who has ONLY Fortune 500 companies for clients would represent a scam? - ZERO ! !
A: "ONLY Fortune 500 companies"? Since when did CMKX, UCAD and any number of other companies become such?
PS: Your words are beginning to sound very familiar...expecially the "walk on water" part about Glenn. I wonder....
[This message has been edited by Wallace#1 (edited September 29, 2004).]
posted
Martha,I like your posts.And I like your interests on your profile."cooking and CMKX". I wonder what CMKX is cooking?Smells good to me.LOL.
IP: Logged |
Read through that site quickly so may have missed a few things.
Anyone ever heard of Crystalix Group International, Inc.?
Where did CMKXTREME.COM come from? Know anything about it?
Noticed that that 8K showed no /s/ for Urban Casavant. Maybe it isn't required for another's 8K?
Noticed also the following: RECITALS
A. CMKX has agreed to loan to the Company Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000) (the "Loan"), which Loan is convertible into Common Stock and the Company has agreed to issue to CMKX warrants (the "Warrants") to purchase up to 2,500,000 shares of Common Stock, provided, among other things, that certain securities registration rights are granted to CMKX.
Why would they be using CMKX's trading symbol? Does CMKX own CMKXTREME.COM? Where did the $2 mil come from...privately or from CMKX? What was the loan for?
Some digging to do here!!!! Could this 8K be a complete fake or is it for real?
[This message has been edited by Wallace#1 (edited September 29, 2004).]
[This message has been edited by Wallace#1 (edited September 29, 2004).]
Topic Closed
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
Printer-friendly view of this topic
