quote:

---

Originally posted by Tgrant:
I dont own this stock or realy follow the thread, but this past weekend I was in Reading pennsylvania for the Lucas oil Nationals. when I was walking through the pits i saw the CMKX extreme machine. i was very surpsrised to see it, they were running in the event. they also had a big rig and a hummer h2 all letered up with "casavant mining, got cmkx?" just thought I would let you all know, good luck

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by HarryHar:
Can someone who understands all that was posted about the lawsuits summarize for us non-legal people what exactly Urban was being sued for, and what Urban later was suing for? Thanks in advance. I read over it but I'm still in the clouds...

---

Harry, it is very difficult to get this whole story, having only chapters 2,3 and 4 of a five or more chapter story.

Missing are the original complaint which would have spelled out the charges. Also missing is the last chapter, the courts final judgement. These are the two most important documents to have.

From chapter two (para 16), we get an idea of what occured:

****************************************

[16] The defendants allege that the transactions that give rise to the claim in these proceedings arose out of a decision in June 1998 to acquire the shares of Radar, basically a dormant shell that owned some ammonite properties in northern Saskatchewan, to use as a structure to develop a mining venture in northern Saskatchewan. A group of investors agreed to buy the control block of Radar from John Bergen. The agreements were that Bergen would transfer 2.5 million shares to 5 individuals, who did not include Urban Casavant, but did include Casavant’s wife, children, brother-in-law, and Ken Hodgson. The consideration paid for the shares at that time was 4 cents a share. According to the defendants, at the end of July 1998, the first payment on the Bergen block was made, and half the shares in the Bergen control block were delivered. The defendants allege that when the stock of Radar increased from 10 cents to 80 cents a share, all the new owners of the control block wanted to do a private placement in Colorado. They then allege that the relationship among the members of the control block broke down in late 1998. The defendants allege that there was an informal pooling arrangement in place pursuant to which all members of the group would wait for the stock to reach $10.00 per share before selling any. The defendants allege that not all parties respected the pooling agreement, some sold their shares into the market, and the allegations and counter allegations began.

*****************************************

From this it appears that a group of investors decided to acquire Radar Acquisition Corp. The defendant White Bear Construction and Logsdons are one of those investors. Other invevstors pay in dollars and or equipment and a puchase is made of Radar. There is an agreement between investors not to sell any shares until it reaches $10 per share. Some of those investors allegedly breach that agreement and the deal falls apart. White Bear sues, and Urban responds that nothing was done to offend White Bear, quite the contrary, it is implied that White Bear is one of those breaching the restrictions on selling.

Without the final judgement, we have no idea who is the offending party in this matter. I hope Pennys is able to find the rest, because it certainly isn't fair to UC and family to simpley put out half of an allegation without all of the facts.

Plaintiff

- and -

JOHN BERGEN

Defendant

IN THE COURT OF QUEEN'S BENCH OF ALBERTA

JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF EDMONTON

BETWEEN:

WHITE BEAR CONSTRUCTION LTD., KEN HODGSON

AND SHARON HODGSON

Plaintiffs

- and -

URBAN CASAVANT, ALLAN MOEN, MCM MINERALS INC.,

FULL TIME MANAGEMENT INC., AND PAN PACIFIC GEM

INDUSTRY (TIANJIN) CO., LTD.

Defendants

I didn't bother going through the pasted info and I believed UC was a defendant.

(I still didn't read)

No offense, but "try reading a little closer"? LMAO

Looks like the above one group sued and UC and others countersued.

complaintiff

No problem sdrobert, but do "try to read a little closer". LOL

divy for casavant intl mining.

If you really want to find positive DD. The outcome of the above suit was I believe a wash if I remember right.

quote:

---

Originally posted by Justhis1ce:
Hello TW, I was wondering if the CMKX pps would be augmented by .0256 on 10/1 if there will indeed be distribution?

---

georgeburns

New basher tactics.
« Thread started on: Today at 3:47pm »

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I think the bashers on this board have realized old tactics will not work. The shareholders on this board are too strong.

They realize that they can't get you to simply sell.

They seem to be shifting to a new tactic. They are going to try to get you to sell on the initial run. They are going to reinforce the short squeeze by getting more people to sell at lower levels. They are going to try to make you think that CMKX is going to run and then drop back into the dirt like it did the last time.

Not going to happen.

quote:

---

Originally posted by Upside:
Is this Friday still the day of reckoning for the shorts or has that been changed?

---

the dividend may follow the shares, but you should be able to track YOUR (dividend) shares down and get them back....
that's the way it's supposed to work....
i've done it....

quote:

---

Originally posted by Upside:
Of course we've noticed. I guess more than anything I'd just like to see some of these wild theories put to rest. But, when you've got so many people who have bet the house, family, and future on this stock, they'll keep coming up with new ones right up to the end.

---