quote:

---

Originally posted by Wallace#1:
Maybe someone suspects bankrupcy? All those folks that are going to their lawyers if CMKX turns out to be a scam won't have anywere to go since CMKX (as a corporation) is a legal entity.

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by will:
Look, I only ask you to consider these missing parts. I only ask you to give a fair and balanced presentation of this company in your posting. I say, to set glassman and Wallace up as targets of negativity so that you can reply with only positve or those windbag over the top theories is wrong. Present both sides. Post the freaking positives, I know there are some, but don't disregard and completely discount the negatives by attacking people that try to include them in anyone decsison making. Jesus, you fault glassman and Wallace for polorizing this thread, I suggest you look at yourselves.
Tell people , yes, the fact that O/S is unknown and maybe astronomical is concern, tell them the samples not be reported on for months is concern. Damn, man, admit to these things. You can tell them you have faith these things will be overcome, that you have Roger Glenn, you have acres and acres of claims. But for god's sake dont attack people that are trying to present what most reasonable people would see as concerns and issues to be addressed.
Do you think I don't want this POC stock to fly? I just don't like the way these clowns that are running it go about their business, and I surely don't like posters being onesdied and discounting anything that someone with a different point view by making the issue personal as opposed to fact based.
Insulting people because they have an opposing point of view. That's real debate, isn't it. That's really getting to the truth here. Ya'll act so rightious. If you were truly rightious you'd at least let have others have their opinions, without being insulting.

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by dwman:
will
Does this mean you won't forgive me?

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by tradingpennys:
..............
Well Said! Unfortunately it NEVER sinks in.
This is a PUMPERS board appearantly.

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by will:
You tolerate me, lol, Who do you think you are, you and your friend dwman insulted me, so get used to tolerating more of me. You should have just let me be my redundant dumbass self asking the same thing over and over.
You have important things to do? What go see what others on other boards have to say? Too bad they can't give you an original thought. You call what you do DD, it's emabarrassing reposting some madmen's theories that just want to protect there investments. You're an enabler for pumpers if not one yourself.
Lets see the important things you have to do, Let's ee the friut of your doing, your expert analysis, and investigation.

---

I have no control over what you post, or how many times you post. But I can control whether I respond to your drivel and baiting. This is the last response you will get from me. I hope the rest here can see what your game is and respond, or fail to respond, as is appropriate.

quote:

---

Originally posted by will:
Of course I will, dwman. I thought about not mentioning you in that post, but I couldn't leave it out, and have it make sense and give it validity. I'm sorry I included you in that post. Now let's see mr. repost, noah apolgize. You have, I have very simple thing to do.
Come on noah, post an apology or the friuts of your "important things" you are doing or have done. I'm sure people are waiting to see all your hard work reposting some windbags crap.

---

Thanks will.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Allright, I just got done doing a little counting and here's what I got.

518 Million shares "traded" at .0001

All of the trades were 9M share blocks except one which was 5M

The first of these trades occurred at 3:39

Not one single trade at .0002 today

Meanwhile while the .0001's were going through all of the .0003's and .0004's appeared to be real trades or at least were odd lot sizes rather than 9M.

Then at 4:09 in ONE MINUTE 1.5B (that's Billion with a B) shares went through at .0003 All but 3 trades were 9M blocks, the other three were 5M blocks.

quote:

---

Originally posted by noahltl:

I have no control over what you post, or how many times you post. But I can control whether I respond to your drivel and baiting. This is the last response you will get from me. I hope the rest here can see what your game is and respond, or fail to respond, as is appropriate.

---

posted August 20, 2004 15:51
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Look, I only ask you to consider these missing parts. I only ask you to give a fair and balanced presentation of this company in your posting. I say, to set glassman and Wallace up as targets of negativity so that you can reply with only positve or those windbag over the top theories is wrong. Present both sides. Post the freaking positives, I know there are some, but don't disregard and completely discount the negatives by attacking people that try to include them in anyone decsison making. Jesus, you fault glassman and Wallace for polorizing this thread, I suggest you look at yourselves.
Tell people , yes, the fact that O/S is unknown and maybe astronomical is concern, tell them the samples not be reported on for months is concern. Damn, man, admit to these things. You can tell them you have faith these things will be overcome, that you have Roger Glenn, you have acres and acres of claims. But for god's sake dont attack people that are trying to present what most reasonable people would see as concerns and issues to be addressed.
Do you think I don't want this POC stock to fly? I just don't like the way these clowns that are running it go about their business, and I surely don't like posters being onesdied and discounting anything that someone with a different point view by making the issue personal as opposed to fact based.
Insulting people because they have an opposing point of view. That's real debate, isn't it. That's really getting to the truth here. Ya'll act so rightious. If you were truly rightious you'd at least let have others have their opinions, without being insulting.
That is my earlier post, there isn't any insult in there, where's the sarcasm, do you se baiting, sound like drivel, or what you all profess you really want?

quote:

---

Originally posted by Money_Penny:
Will,

You ask Noah for an apology and then in the next post you insult him??? How do you think he'll respond? For those of you who are tired of the fighting and the negativity, leave your weapons and your armor behind and come to the "other" thread, you must behave though...
http://www.allstocks.com/stockmessageboard/ubb/Forum8/HTML/008738.html

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by Tamie:
noah,
I for one appreciate all you bring to this board, and likewise the fate of cmkx isnt on your shoulders. Your opinion is your own. No matter what anyone else thinks. That goes for anyone who posts DD.

---

quote:

---

Yea, I'm a paid basher, lol.

---

Was that you I saw standing on the street corner with a cardboard sign that read "will bash for cash"? That's pretty sad man. Need a job? Maybe I can help.

LAS VEGAS, Aug 20, 2004 (BUSINESS WIRE) -- U.S. Canadian Minerals Inc. (UCAD) announced that the foreclosure sale on the property in Lincoln County, Nev., upon which it holds an option to purchase, was completed today securing the property for Nevada Minerals Inc. UCAD was previously granted an option to purchase this property from Nevada Minerals Inc. for $2,000,000 This transaction clears the way for UCAD to consider the exercise of such option and the launching of operations on the property. UCAD is currently negotiating a land use agreement for access and use prior to exercising the option.

Among the infrastructure comprising the property are 88,400 square feet of industrial and office buildings, certain riparian rights to more than 515.6 acre-feet of water annually drawn from two wells, and an electric power sub-station with a long-term, low-cost power supply contract.

quote:

---

Originally posted by Money_Penny:
For those of you who are tired of the fighting and the negativity, leave your weapons and your armor behind and come to the "other" thread, you must behave though...

---

See, MP? THIS is what I'm talking about! You are willing to take the "good people" and the valid DD (good or bad) to another thread? You've got it all backwards, man. We need to find a way to rid this thread of the bad guys, NOT the good guys.

Can't you see what a freakin' MESS it has been today, sifting through THREE cmkx threads? And, from 3:45PM on, was certainly NOT the time to be doing THAT!

I applaud your intentions, along with Tamie, but lets face it ... this has turned into a 3-ring circus.

Now as for you low-life sub-humans who don't know how to express an opposing point of view without insulting and alienating others - You probably frequently got "Does not play well with others" on your kindergarten report cards, didn't you? You are so freakin' naive that you think people attack you because of your opposing point of view, when in reality, people attack you because you're a$$holes who can't interact with other human beings. Seriously - get therapy. Or learn to state your case without being vile and venomous. Treat others with respect, and you will be treated the same. Then, both sides of the story can be represented here.

quote:

---

Originally posted by Tamie:
Everyone wants to state their opinions good or bad about this stock. Thats what we are here for. But take your opinions of the posters somewhere else. I personally dont care what you think of each other. I only care about the info pertaining to cmkx. Good or bad info. Negative or positive opinions of the STOCK.

---

Tamie-

You've summed it up nicely. Discuss STOCKS here. Discuss EACH OTHER elsewhere. That's what "The Back Alley" is for.
http://www.allstocks.com/stockmessageboard/ubb/Forum8/HTML/008418.html

"Take it outside..."

quote:

---

Originally posted by WinsumLosesum:
See, MP? THIS is what I'm talking about! You are willing to take the "good people" and the valid DD (good or bad) to another thread? You've got it all backwards, man. We need to find a way to rid this thread of the bad guys, NOT the good guys.

Can't you see what a freakin' MESS it has been today, sifting through THREE cmkx threads? And, from 3:45PM on, was certainly NOT the time to be doing THAT!

I applaud your intentions, along with Tamie, but lets face it ... this has turned into a 3-ring circus.

Now as for you low-life sub-humans who don't know how to express an opposing point of view without insulting and alienating others - You probably frequently got "Does not play well with others" on your kindergarten report cards, didn't you? You are so freakin' naive that you think people attack you because of your opposing point of view, when in reality, people attack you because you're a$$holes who can't interact with other human beings. Seriously - get therapy. Or learn to state your case without being vile and venomous. Treat others with respect, and you will be treated the same. Then, both sides of the story can be represented here.

---

Winsum, thanks for your eloquent reply. That's exactly what I would have liked to say.

My Grandmother used to tell the story of a stranger who wandered into a town and asked an old man what sort of people lived there. The old man asked him 'What sort of people were in the town where you used to live?' The stranger replied 'Liars. thieves and Con Men.' The old man replied 'That is what you will find here' Another stranger wandered into town a short while later and asked the same old man what sort of people lived there. The old man asked him 'What sort of people lived in the town where you used to live?' The stranger replied 'Honest, hard wroking, decent folk'. The old man replied 'That is the sort you will find here'.

There is a lot of truth to that story. I am finding the sort of people in CMKX that I relate to. A lawyer who is smart and can put together deals, A serendipitous prospector who knows how to sew up the biggest land grab of the century and knows how to play poker with the best of them, and an investor relations guy who is what you see is what you get. Should I look and see things I don't want to see? I say yes to issues involving integrity and no to personal taste. It really won't matter if UC or Melvin wear suits and have a polished image if they are wolves out to fleece you. I will take them as they are. I think they are who they appear to be. I think the company has integrity and I expect this will turn out very well.

The .0001 sells were peculiar and out of the blue. I was buying at the same time the prices were low and my fill was at .0004. When we get the big picture via PR one of these days it should all make sense.

quote:

---

Originally posted by WinsumLosesum:
See, MP? THIS is what I'm talking about! You are willing to take the "good people" and the valid DD (good or bad) to another thread? You've got it all backwards, man. We need to find a way to rid this thread of the bad guys, NOT the good guys.

Can't you see what a freakin' MESS it has been today, sifting through THREE cmkx threads? And, from 3:45PM on, was certainly NOT the time to be doing THAT!

I applaud your intentions, along with Tamie, but lets face it ... this has turned into a 3-ring circus.

Now as for you low-life sub-humans who don't know how to express an opposing point of view without insulting and alienating others - You probably frequently got "Does not play well with others" on your kindergarten report cards, didn't you? You are so freakin' naive that you think people attack you because of your opposing point of view, when in reality, people attack you because you're a$$holes who can't interact with other human beings. Seriously - get therapy. Or learn to state your case without being vile and venomous. Treat others with respect, and you will be treated the same. Then, both sides of the story can be represented here.

---

Listen, we all know that things escalate. If both sides "disarm unilaterally," no one will feel the need to "respond in kind."

quote:

---

Originally posted by will:
And...tell me to this point that I haven't framed my questions, concerns regarding the shortcomings of this stock in a civil manner. I would not have gotten personal if others didn't.
Now if you see me as an a$$hole. let me know. The only other run in I had here was months ago when Paul referenced the name Phillip Casavant, and wouldn't speak openly reagrding it, leaving it open for suspicious speculation, leaving doubt. I apologized to Paul for my zeal, and moved on.

---

quote:

---

I never referred to this as a scam.

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by Upside:
originally posted by will:
I have.

---

U.S. Canadian Minerals Inc. (OTCBB: UCAD) announced that the foreclosure sale on the property in Lincoln County, Nev., upon which it holds an option to purchase, was completed today securing the property for Nevada Minerals Inc. UCAD was previously granted an option to purchase this property from Nevada Minerals Inc. for $2,000,000 This transaction clears the way for UCAD to consider the exercise of such option and the launching of operations on the property. UCAD is currently negotiating a land use agreement for access and use prior to exercising the option.

Among the infrastructure comprising the property are 88,400 square feet of industrial and office buildings, certain riparian rights to more than 515.6 acre-feet of water annually drawn from two wells, and an electric power sub-station with a long-term, low-cost power supply contract.

Further details relative to this project will be forthcoming in future press releases and at http://www.uscanadian.com/.

Safe Harbor Statement under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995: Statements contained in this document which are not historical fact are forward-looking statements based upon management's current expectations that are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those set forth in or implied by forward-looking statements.

SOURCE: U.S. Canadian Minerals Inc.

U.S. Canadian Minerals Inc. Chris Hanneman, 303-220-8476

Customize your Business Wire news & multimedia to match your needs. Get breaking news from companies and organizations worldwide. Logon for FREE today at www.BusinessWire.com.

quote:

---

Which is fine with me too, but have you not changed your opinion as facts were made available? You probably have changed your opinion several times, from good back to bad, back to good. I freely admit I have. Tell me UpMan, do the pain in the ass questions I ask regarding the shortcomings of this company concern you? Can you ignore them? Can you put a Zen, Dr Dr, Sterling, bandaid on them and fool yourself that you're into the play of the century?
Are there folks here that have and will continue to do that? Will they influence other new people into the same thought process? If this venture falls on its ass will they feel any responsibility for their actions? Do they have an agenda, keeping the greater fools close so when things pop or go upside down they will have some to habd the stinkbag to?

---

Will,
my feelings about this company have waverd between varying degrees of bad, never really making it up to the good level. At one point I almost thought they were making an effort to become a legitimate company. That ended for me the day they released the p/r stating that the Carolyn pipe was found to be diamondiferous. If you remember, that was released on a Thursday after the market closed and the U.S markets were closed on Friday for President Reagans funeral. They elected not to release the fact that they had only found 2 microscopic diamonds. Do you have any idea what kind of harm this caused to others? Look at their two partners in Canada. The Canadian markets were open that day and their stock was thrown into a turmoil over it and they were halted for a day and a half while the TSX demanded they release the full report. These two companies were probably trying to figure out a way to put a positive spin on the report but Urban jumped the gun and through his self-serving antics, forced them to release it outright. This had to have caused irreparable harm to their relationship if in fact one ever did exist. Another thing is the share count which more and more looks like 450+ billion is accurate. I hear people saying "well, I'm comfortable with that." I have to ask, what kind of a legitimate company sells that many shares and does nothing with the money except buy claims on land that others had ignored? Were talking in excess of a hundred million dollars of our money here. Where did it go? Into Urbans pocket, into race cars, trucks, bikes, and an over the top advertising campaign that is only designed to sell more shares. My hunch is that Urban was starting to feel the heat for this gross display of negligence and realized he needed a high powered attorney to get him out of the mess he created. Enter Mr. Glenn. I believe we are beginning to see the fruits of his labors with all of the deals between CMKX, UCAD, GEMM, CIM, and now a London based investment company. How this will all turn out I have no idea but I can't see the end result being anything good for the shareholders. If you strip away all of the wheeling and dealing and the tangled web of companies, they are still a tiny, tiny company with 450+ billion shares outstanding and no attorney in the world is going to create value out of that. As far as Zen, Dr.D and Sterling go, they don't warrent discussion. Their wild theories are wrong, plain and simple. My recent purchase was based on a hunch that we were going to see a pop that never occured, but my average is still only .00035 so I'm ok and believe me, we will see another pop up near the .001 level some time soon. Yes, I share the same concerns as you, but I think there's a lot more of them too. Everyone here who is nailing you, glassman, and Wallace should try to quit with the name calling and accusations and take a good hard look at what you're trying to tell everyone. This is as risky a stock as has ever come along and anyone who has "bet the farm" on it had better think long and hard about that decision. There's a lot of new investors out there who hold only this stock. I've heard talks of brothers, sisters, moms, dads, cousins, all investing in this at the urging of some of us. What happens to those people if this thing falls apart?