Allstocks.com's Bulletin Board
Topic Closed  Topic Closed
Post New Topic  New Poll  
Topic Closed  Topic Closed
my profile login | register | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Allstocks.com's Bulletin Board » Micro Penny Stocks, Penny Stocks $0.10 & Under » CMKX IV New Thread....GOT IT - HOLDIN' IT (Page 34)

 - UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!   This topic comprises 65 pages: 1  2  3  ...  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  ...  63  64  65   
Author Topic: CMKX IV New Thread....GOT IT - HOLDIN' IT
WinsumLosesum
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for WinsumLosesum     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Originally posted by Wallace#1:
Winsum,

Great post! Very meaningful.


Meaningful, yes. Comforting, no.

I just emailed again, asking how or if I would be protected in a worst-case scenario. I'll post the reply.


Posts: 1872 | From: right here | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Money_Penny
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Money_Penny     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Okay okay okay (in an annoying Joe Pesci tone). What is all this debating over??? Aren't you making this way toop complicated??? I myself tend to look at things in a much more simplistic way. Now tell me if I'm wrong.

I purchased X amount of CMKX shares on the open market, through a legit broker, and I now hold those shares in my account. I have records from my broker that I have purchsed X amount of shares and that I own those shares (street name). If those shares were sold legally or if they were created out of mid air (naked short) does not really concern me, since I have "real" CMKX shares in my account, period. NOBODY can take those shares out of my account except me, when I sell them!!!

In the future, when the PPS has increased to a point where I feel I want to sell part of or all of my shares, I put in a sell order and those shares will be sold on the open market and I my account will be credited with the sold amount. End of story.

The only question in my mind, after reading all of this BS, is will I get the dividend shares since the TA may not have a record of my shares if they were naked shorted. You know what, screw the dividend shares!!! I couldn't care less about a few untradeable UCAD & CIM shares. I am here for CMKX and that's where I will make my money.

Am I wrong???


Posts: 430 | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
JBCak47
Member


Rate Member
Icon 4 posted      Profile for JBCak47     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Also if you have a cash account and used cash to purchase, you shares CAN NOT be naked shorted, as per my understanding. Only Margin accounts can be shorted.

Legally if you purchase x company share at x price, and if the cash is transfered, you have an execution number, the shares electronically show up in your account and you get the documents showing your sells/buys, which they are legally required to send you at tax time.

All those seller/buyer agreements, plus existing secuirities laws would make it totally illegal for brokerages NOT to give you a dividend, even if you do hold naked shorts. Understand the potential windfall that would occur due to undermining the value of our exchanges as well as brokerages being hurt from bad publicity would be scandalous.

Any brokerage that does not want to hurt their consumer and their public perception would legally force any MM to comply with the dividend.

There are no ways around that. Each share holder bought in GOOD FAITH that they were buying into CMKX. That is the legality of the law. You purchased something in which you are now entitled, legally to (WHEN they issue the dividend).

I think, in my opinion, that the O/S will be 40 billion with an A/S of 400 Billion but with like 250-400 Billion naked shorts...

They will issue the shares to the 40 Billion O/S. This is what CMKX is LEGALLY obligied to do. That is what THEIR books, as well as any SEC books (when they report) will say. So legally they only have to issue to the 40 Billion O/S.

HOWEVER

Now legally the MM's who sold the naked shorts sold us legal CMKX shares.

Our brokerages did just that, broker the sale and hold the shares in trust.

They WILL turn to the MM's, not the company CMKX to provide any dividends.

The MM's will now have to cover.

Either buy the shares back or buy UCAD for EVERY dividend.

Keep in mind this falls on a number of MM's so it will be distributed among a number of Mm's not just a single enitity.

In the end it will be cheaper to just buy back CMKX from as many people as possible... Not a problem except:

CMKX RACE CAR

The race car will bring in new potential investors. The MM's now have the added responisbility of buying back the naked shorts but issuing shares to these new investors.

If the CMKX Race car wins a race, and it will have 12 chances to do so, there maybe more long term buying pressure, in a small, but forceful way, lowering the 'float' and making more shares 'longterm' shares. At the same time buying pressure will either drive up stock price or at the very least cause MM'S to work even harder, they can buy back naked shorts, but will they issue the new investors, who may have only cash accounts, not margin accounts, real non naked shorted shares?

You see, buying pressure, lower 'float', dividend to force cover, many shares being 'long term', diamonds, minerals, plus mineral rights on 1.4 million acres= HUGE PPS in theory at least.

However that area Canada has already been found to contain diamonds....

-John-


Posts: 759 | From: Long Island, NY | Registered: Dec 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
HarryHar
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for HarryHar     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Is it or is it not our brokers (Ameritrade, Etrade, etc) responsibility to make sure that after three days, our pink sheet buys are settled? If so, then we should have nothing to worry about. They will be held responisible if they are acting with negligience. They may even be perpetuating the naked short selling which makes them just as guilty as the MM's that are making the fake shares. If they are not responsible for making sure that pink sheet stocks that are bought are settled, then who is? It worries me to have to think about this. I would like to believe that Glenn and Urban would not execute the plan unless they were ready to do it without burning the stockholders. I also would like to believe that they already know how this will play out and that they have it planned out to the T. But now, I'm wondering if I should really get them in certificate. What if this really IS the only way to be safe?

Debi do you hold certificates, and if so, what % of your total CMKX investment, if you don't mind me asking?


Posts: 212 | Registered: Jan 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
HarryHar
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for HarryHar     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Does anyone know...

How will our company keep track of the # of naked shares that are retired by MM's purchasing to retire? Sure, they may buy UCAD and issue us dividends, but after the dividend, we would still be holding naked shares. Anyone know how this situation would be tallied? Does anyone know who's gonna keep track, and make sure that the # naked shares that exists is 0? How? I am not turning pessimistic on this stock. I would like to know some more answers if they are out there, regarding this situation. Since this type of situation has really never happened before in Pink Sheet History, there are so many unknowns and so many heads to the beast. Any opnions, dd, is greatly appreciated. 17M+ long and strong...


Posts: 212 | Registered: Jan 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
WWJD-thru-me
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for WWJD-thru-me     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Hi All, I am back, I won my speeding ticket appeal on the technicality I was hoping for: the officer who gave me the ticket failed to show up-an automatic win for me. (and an answer to a specific prayer).

Wallace-I was agreeing with all of what Bill posted except that the value of our company would only come from diamonds when mined. I was attempting to say the mineral rights claims we own have a huge value in and of themselves. Those claims are rumored to be available for sale with some of the proceeds to be given to the shareholders as cash dividends. We also have other minerals and other companies per various PR's over the last 18 months.

I wanted to post a link to anyone who wants to read what Melvin had to say on Paltalk. It is mostly a Heartfelt Thank you to all the
CMKX shareholders who cared enough to write and send flowers, prayers or get well wishes. It is about 10 minutes long-so I will supply the link:
http://1millionaire.********s31.com/index.cgi?board=general&action=display&num=1090860390

Winsum thanks for yout post and everyone else thanks for your contributions here.
GLTA-IMO-DD-Debi


Posts: 1188 | From: Clinton, MA 01510 | Registered: Jan 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
GatorMan
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for GatorMan     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
JBCak47, the race car will do nothing for us. Win or loose. It's a waste of company money. Companies who advertise in this mannor are advertising a PRODUCT, not INVESTMENT. But, as I've said before, maybe the investment IS the product, and that would be pretty scary for us longs.

I'm sure Urban feels fully justifed in supporting a racing team and calling it advertising. IMO it's no more than an indulgence in his passion for racing at shareholders expense.

Just wanted to put in my 50 shares worth.

------------------
~,-,-< GatorMan


Posts: 752 | From: Springville, Utah | Registered: Jan 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
WWJD-thru-me
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for WWJD-thru-me     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
CLSI won their case against a basher. Please don't take that as an implication that anyone here is one but I hope this board doesn't attract them like RB and some others do.

SI Clancy`s Judgment Against Basher Upheld

July 26, 2004 12:19:00 (ET)


DENVER, Jul 26, 2004 (BUSINESS WIRE) -- Clancy Systems International, Inc. (CLSI, Trade), a leading developer of parking enforcement solutions, was notified on Friday that it's judgment against a basher who had harassed the company for almost three years at various chat room sites, including Raging Bull, was upheld by the Massachusetts Supreme Court. The Company intends to pursue the judgment award.

In a case originally filed with the Superior Court of the Trial Court of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts in September of 2000, the Company sought the identities of John Does 1-10 and filed a claim for damages. This was done as a result of an ongoing barrage of false, defamatory and slanderous remarks about the Company, its officers, its employees and shareholders that were made on Raging Bull and other chat room sites. The persons who perpetrated these falsehoods did so by posting their remarks under alias identities. Once the true identities were disclosed, the individuals were notified to cease and desist their actions. One individual continued his activities which included profanities and death threats. As the postings by this individual did not cease, the Company pursued the case.

The Company was awarded a judgment against the defendant on October 31, 2001. The defendant then began a process of filing appeals through the Massachusetts Court System. The final appeal to the Massachusetts Supreme Court was filed in June 2004.

Throughout this lengthy process, the defendant never provided proof that he at any time owned shares of the Company. He never contacted the Company directly to verify information. It appears that this was a recreational activity. There were over 5,000 posts during the period, and on some days the posts were continual for 10 to 12 hours.

While the Company feels the verdict is just, Company officials expressed sadness that they were forced to take this matter to the courts in the first place. "It has been a terrible ordeal for the Company and its shareholders. We have spent a great deal of time on this matter and wasted valuable Company financial resources. While we understand that a forum like Raging Bull offers an opportunity for favorable and unfavorable comments about publicly held companies, this individual violated all terms of service and went beyond the acceptable rules for posting," stated L. Wolfson, a Company spokesperson.

This press release contains projections and other forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. These projections and statements reflect the Company's current views with respect to future events and financial performance. No assurance can be given, however, that these events will occur or that these projections will be achieved and actual results could differ materially from those projected as a result of certain factors. A discussion of these factors is included in the Company's periodic reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

SOURCE: Clancy Systems International, Inc.



Posts: 1188 | From: Clinton, MA 01510 | Registered: Jan 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Wallace#1
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Wallace#1         Edit/Delete Post 
Debi,

Fantastic!!!! You must be one smart kid figuring out the cop might not show because of the convention. I have heard they don't always show when it's their day off too.

Did you misunderstand what I was saying to Bill? I responded incorrectly to one of his posts, not to anything you might have posted.

As to value of CMKX, I agree that the value will come from diamonds...but must add "when and IF found".

Again, extremely happy at least one lawless person beat the rap! LOL


Posts: 3607 | From: NJ - Outside Phila. | Registered: Mar 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
sherry
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for sherry     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
can repost the link to what Melvin said this morning the one you posted does not work
Posts: 15 | From: winthrop ar usa | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
tahoechris
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for tahoechris     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Heres what he said
"First thing he said on Paltalk (approximate quote): "I'm only going to say one thing about CMKX. Take it from Uncle Melvie (chuckle): There is definitely bigger and bigger things that are going to happen."

"I've never met so many caring and loving people"

"All Urban wants is for us to be one big happy RICH family...and believe me, it will come to that."

"I'd like to personally thank each and every one of you. I'd like to give you all a big hug, but I can't, and that hurts. But there are certain people that have meant a lot to me (you all have, but certain people...) Judy, God bless you... Peter and his wife"

(voice really getting emotional now)

"For the emails, flowers, the most beautiful time in the world I've ever spent, Vicki and I, God bless each and every one of you. We HAVE become a family. I'll never forget any of you, regardless of what happens to this stock."

"I'm going to leave you people with something that is near and dear to Vicki and my heart. 12 years ago we lost our son. We're not the only people who've ever lost a loved one....whatever happened, God made happen for a reason. What I'm about to tell you is the honest truth. I want you to sit back, enjoy a cup of coffee, and listen to me.."

"the year is 1991, Vancouver CA. A 9-yr-old boy sitting in a hospital room isolation ward, chemo, radiation is about to kill him. He goes through a bone-marrow transplant (devastating). 14 days after my marrow was given to Jeff, they did a bone marrow biopsy...that's where they take some marrow from his back..."

(pauses to talk to someone)

"My other two sons are back in Sask. because we didn't want to bring them, because of the stress..anyway, the day we did the biopsy, we wanted the results as quick as possible. The Dr. Spent all day in the lab making sure to get the results. That night, 10pm, 1/17, he came to our room at 10pm...I want you people to picture this...beautiful night, snow, all's quite, Jeff's looking out the window...Dr. comes in, big smile on his face.

1st thing he said: the transplant's working. Well, you know what we thought. We all broke up, Jeff started to smile, we talked for a few minutes, the Dr. left.

My wife and I have made a promise to one another, if this transplant worked, we'd get the other boys, and we decided to do that. I was going to fly home and get the boys and bring them back. We chatted, Jeff was getting tired, so we decided to let him sleep. When we did that and we were saying our goodbyes, Jeff looked at the both of us and said, "Dad...when you go home tomorrow, will you do me a favor? Can you thank the people back home for helping me get my life back?" A 9-yr-old boy wanted to say thank you from teh bottom of his heart to folks for giving his life back.

Point: I want to thank all of you, shareholders, everyone who's had anything to do with CMKX, I want to say this...same thing. I want to think each and every one of you...for the kindness, respect, goodness, everyone has shown. I'll never forget, vicki will never forget, as long as she's on this earth (may be 6 months, a year, 10 years, we don't know), she literally broke down and cried in that room, and she doesn't do that often. I just wanted to thank you.

A while back I said, if this thing takes off, all I want is a thank you. But what I want to say now is that I want to thank each and every one of you for what you've done. If there's anything I can do for YOU, I'm always here for you. Thanks's folks"


Posts: 85 | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
sherry
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for sherry     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
thank you tahoechris for your posting of what melin said.
Posts: 15 | From: winthrop ar usa | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Money_Penny
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Money_Penny     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I ask again:

1. I purchased X amount of shares
2. X shares are in my brokerage account
3. NOBODY can take those shares away from me
4. The shares remain in my account until I sell.
5. When I sell, somebody will pay real money for them, and that money will get credited to my account.

Am I wrong???


Posts: 430 | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
GatorMan
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for GatorMan     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Originally posted by Money_Penny:
I ask again:

1. I purchased X amount of shares
2. X shares are in my brokerage account
3. NOBODY can take those shares away from me
4. The shares remain in my account until I sell.
5. When I sell, somebody will pay real money for them, and that money will get credited to my account.

Am I wrong???



I think you are pretty much right. I'll admit I don't know but I wonder if the book work doesn't go something like this:

A MM sells shares short (naked). The TA gets notice and adds the shares under your name and deducts the shares under the MM's name, which will now show a negative amount. When the dividend is due the TA sends out the dividend to everyone with a positive balance (i.e., you) and sets up a negative share account for the MM (i.e., he owes the TA shares of the dividend stock just like he does of the original stock). So now the dividend stock is also shorted by the MM.

Again, I have no reason to beleive it happens this way but it seems like a reasonable way to handle it. If this is the case perhpas the MMs don't really have to come up with the shares of the dividend stock or cover the shorts. They just become short in the dividend stock.

If they can create the original stock out of thin air why can't they do the same with the dividend stock?

------------------
~,-,-< GatorMan


Posts: 752 | From: Springville, Utah | Registered: Jan 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
VNGNTN1
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for VNGNTN1     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
MP
My opinion on safety priority:
1-Hold Certicates
2-Trade from "CASH" account
3-Trade from "MARGIN" account
VAN

Posts: 1424 | From: Peoria, IL. USA | Registered: Oct 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Wallace#1
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Wallace#1         Edit/Delete Post 
GatorMan,

No offense, but it looks like you need a new book. It just does not work that way. The TA is not involved with normal trades.

A buys stock through broker C
B sells stock through broker D

MMs either sell themselves to C for A or buy themselves from D for B, or, they match the trades of A-C (buy) and B-D (sell).

Under normal circumstances, the TA is not informed of these trades...whether naked or real shares are involved. The only way I can think of the TA being involved is if A requests his certificate through C. Even then, I cannot see where the MM would be involved.

[This message has been edited by Wallace#1 (edited July 26, 2004).]


Posts: 3607 | From: NJ - Outside Phila. | Registered: Mar 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Wallace#1
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Wallace#1         Edit/Delete Post 
VAN,

As I have said before, the only guarantee that you hold valid shares (where there is a huge amount of naked short selling) is to hold the physical certificates. Then, and only then, will the TA have your name on it's records...and that is because the TA would have been the only entity that recorded and sent that physical certificate to you through your broker.


Posts: 3607 | From: NJ - Outside Phila. | Registered: Mar 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
GatorMan
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for GatorMan     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Originally posted by Wallace#1:
GatorMan,

No offense, but it looks like you need a new book. It just does not work that way. The TA is not involved with normal trades.

A buys stock through broker C
B sells stock through broker D

MMs either sell themselves to C for A or buy themselves from D for B, or, they match the trades of A-C (buy) and B-D (sell).

Under normal circumstances, the TA is not informed of these trades...whether naked or real shares are involved. The only way I can think of the TA being involved is if A requests his certificate through C. Even then, I cannot see where the MM would be involved.


[This message has been edited by Wallace#1 (edited July 26, 2004).]


As I said, my scenario was speculation. But I still think the TA does more than issue certificates. I think they are the ones who keep track of who owns the stock for the record. So when a MM sells you stock they notify the TA tha x shares were sold from their position to yours and the TA makes the book entry. If not, how does any company determine who is the stock holder of record? I doubt they go to each brokerage and MM and ask them. To many chances for missing someone or down right fraud. The TA is, I beleive, the record keeper for the stock.

You are absolutly correct about how the MMs match up the buys and sells. But it's the TA that keeps track of who owns the stock.

Once again, this is how I see it happening and I may be 100% wrong (wow, that would be a first! ) It would be something interesting to research.

------------------
~,-,-< GatorMan


Posts: 752 | From: Springville, Utah | Registered: Jan 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Money_Penny
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Money_Penny     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
L2 at 3:50

From another board

BID ASK

11@.0003 1@.0004 (JEFF)
6@.0002 6@.0005
None@.0001 4@.0006


Posts: 430 | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Wallace#1
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Wallace#1         Edit/Delete Post 
No, GatorMan, the MM would not be informing the TA of his trades. The MM is an electronic market maker...strictly debits and credits. His dealings are with the broker who keeps a record for the shareholder. There is no way the TA would be recording each and every trade in any particular security.

If you hold the physical certificate, yes, the TA has you recorded as the owner of valid shares.

As to distributions of any kind (and here, I reiterate, I am not sure) I suspect that the distribution is sent to the DTC in some kind of lump form and that is distributed to the brokers who record in the shareholders' accounts. Remember, as far as that distribution is concerned, the TA absolutely DOES know how many issued and outstanding shares there are. Say there are 10 shares total issued and outstanding. The TA would then provide the DTC with another 10 shs for a 2x1 split (and here, again, I am not sure how it is done) to distribute to the brokers and then to the shareholders. This is precisely why I say any naked shares sold (such as 5 in my example) would create problems. The TA could not provide the DTC with more shares than legally should exist. Therefore, 5 shs would remain invalid. Problem also comes in the fact that all shares are mixed together during trading, so the valid vs the invalid cannot be sorted out as far as I can determine. I do think some innocents could get hurt. That is why I have been suggesting demanding the physical certificates.
--------------------------------------------
Remember, this dilema will exist only if there is a large quantity of naked shorted shares sold by the MMs. Some posters here insist that is the case. Others, say that it is not the case. I sure as hell do not know!
-------------------------------------

Must go now...a few things to do at home.

[This message has been edited by Wallace#1 (edited July 26, 2004).]


Posts: 3607 | From: NJ - Outside Phila. | Registered: Mar 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
bill1352
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for bill1352     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
i just got off the phone with ameritrade..the 800 number listed on line....the girl i talked to never heard of such a thing so she went to talk to her supervisor, when she came back she asked if i was asking because of a certain stock...i said yes and told her it was cmkx...she said she thought so, that the ppl in charge have been discussing it and yes ameritrade would not want any of its customers to have this happen to them because of their reputation. of course she didn't go into detail but they knew about cmkx and they were discussing the posibbility from the way she talked. she did say they have no plan in place if this was to happen and she believed that ameritrade would stand up for their customers if such an event did happen
Posts: 3651 | From: Algonac, MI. 48001 | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
VNGNTN1
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for VNGNTN1     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
BILL
How nice of them ??
VAN

Posts: 1424 | From: Peoria, IL. USA | Registered: Oct 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
bill1352
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for bill1352     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
from what i've read and from my call to ameritrade the only person that knows you have shares is your broker. the ta just records total amounts to keep a continus count against the o/s. if a mm is naked shorting he would not let the ta know as at some point it would if deeply shorted run the buys over the o/s and he would be caught...the broker would never know (from call to ameritrade) and the ta would never know. if a stock is naked shorted the way ppl think cmkx is the ta would have more listed shares sold then the o/s which they would have to know. if it turns out that it is naked shorted come whatever date they pass out the ucad & cim shares then all records & names would have to be pulled and matched up and any shares that didn't match would have to be erased from the account they are held in or covered by the mm at fault. when all is said and done the number of shares held in street name at all brokers can not go over the o/s and if your shares fall into that list you will not be able to trade them.
Posts: 3651 | From: Algonac, MI. 48001 | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Money_Penny
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Money_Penny     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Sorry bill, but I don't see how:

1. Shares can be erased from an account
2. Shares in your account can be deemed untradeable

No way in hell!!!


Posts: 430 | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Upside
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for Upside     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I'm assuming that this huge naked short position, if real, is a fairly recent development? Remember, in September of last year there was a 2 for 1 forward split followed by a CMI dividend in October of last year and then a name change and new CUSIP # assigned in March of this year. All of these events, according to some, will force a short position cover yet at no time during these three did we see it happen. Does that mean that this massive short position was built up since March of this year or at the latest, September/October of last year?
Posts: 5729 | From: Wisconsin | Registered: Sep 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
GatorMan
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for GatorMan     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Source: http://www.sec.gov/answers/transferagent.htm

Note function #1.

Transfer Agents
Companies that have publicly traded securities typically use transfer agents to keep track of the individuals and entities that own their stocks and bonds. Most transfer agents are banks or trust companies, but sometimes a company acts as its own transfer agent.

Transfer agents perform three main functions:

1. Issue and cancel certificates to reflect changes in ownership. For example, when a company declares a stock dividend or stock split, the transfer agent issues new shares. Transfer agents keep records of who owns a company’s stocks and bonds and how those stocks and bonds are held—whether by the owner in certificate form, by the company in book-entry form, or by the investor’s brokerage firm in street name. They also keep records of how many shares or bonds each investor owns.

2. Act as an intermediary for the company. A transfer agent may also serve as the company’s paying agent to pay out interest, cash and stock dividends, or other distributions to stock- and bondholders. In addition, transfer agents act as proxy agent (sending our proxy materials), exchange agent (exchanging a company’s stock or bonds in a merger), tender agent (tendering shares in a tender offer), and mailing agent (mailing the company’s quarterly, annual, and other reports).

3. Handle lost, destroyed, or stolen certificates. Transfer agents help shareholders and bondholders when a stock or bond certificate has been lost, destroyed, or stolen. If this has happened to you, read our search key topic, Stock Certificates, Lost, Stolen. Also, if you hold securities in your own name and want to transfer or sell them, you may need to get your signature "guaranteed" before a transfer agent will accept the transaction. For information about transferring your securities, please read "Signature Guarantees: Preventing the Unauthorized Transfer of Securities" in our Fast Answers databank.
In many cases, you can find out which transfer agent a company uses by visiting the investor relations section of the company's website. You also can find general information about transfer agents on the Securities Transfer Association website, a private trade organization. Please note that the STA is not equipped to respond to individual inquiries via the telephone, mail, or e-mail. Shareholders with transfer related inquiries, even if they are general in nature, would be best served by speaking to the transfer agent or issuer for the security in question or their broker-dealer.

------------------
~,-,-< GatorMan


Posts: 752 | From: Springville, Utah | Registered: Jan 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Money_Penny
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Money_Penny     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I must say the bashers are doing a good job. They have completely diverted our attention and they've now got us worried about the shares in our accounts not being legit. They are saying "order certificates if you want to be safe". They know this will not affect us longs (as we have nothing to lose), but any newbie or lurker reading this discussion will definitely think twice about keeping this stock. Think about it!!!
Posts: 430 | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
GatorMan
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for GatorMan     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Originally posted by Money_Penny:
I must say the bashers are doing a good job. They have completely diverted our attention and they've now got us worried about the shares in our accounts not being legit. They are saying "order certificates if you want to be safe". They know this will not affect us longs (as we have nothing to lose), but any newbie or lurker reading this discussion will definitely think twice about keeping this stock. Think about it!!!

Well, I'm trying my best to counter some of that by trying to understand EXACTLY how the system works. For some of us getting the physical certificate is not an option. My shares are in an IRA and I think getting the certificates would amount to a distribution.

For those who offer statements on how things work without stating that they are guessing or speculation I'd suggest a link to your source.

------------------
~,-,-< GatorMan


Posts: 752 | From: Springville, Utah | Registered: Jan 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Money_Penny
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Money_Penny     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Thanks Gatorman,

Now we know the TAs know how many shares each of us own. When it's dividend time, we won't be forgotten, even if our shares were naked shorted. This confirms what I've said earlier...the shares in our accounts are REAL. NOBODY (besides us) can touch them. As far as I'm concerned, any further discussion on this topic, casting any doubts over these FACTS, should be regarded as bashing.


Posts: 430 | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
rivercity
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for rivercity     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
gatorman, thanks great info. i to have spoken to ameritrade,their broker assured me that if you have a cash account,not margin,you most definitely will receive any and all dividends. he also stated that cash accounts could NOT be short sold. also,stated that you have actual shares in a cash account. and finally he said that YES they have been getting a lot questions about cmkx..........rivercity
Posts: 58 | From: austin,tx. u.s.a. | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
bill1352
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for bill1352     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
gator man..i stand corrected...but i still dont see the mm's letting the ta know how many shares they have traded if a bunch was naked shorted, at some point it would pass the o/s, that is if cmkx is naked shorted by as much as some ppl believe. they would then be busted and game over. plus if when the dividend is paid and all accounts are increased by x number of ucad shares and if there are ppl with cmkx shares but no ucad and its over the o/s those would not be legal shares thus they never existed how can a broker let you sell something that doesn't exist? the broker would have to go back to the ta who would go to the mm and thats the only person you could be allowed to sell those naked shares to...the person that created them out of thin air. but not on the open market.
Posts: 3651 | From: Algonac, MI. 48001 | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Upside
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for Upside     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
River, Money, & Gator,
I dont know, the way I read function # 1 is that the TA keeps the records in three different ways. Let's say the 4 of us all used Ameritrade and we each had 1 million shares, held by Ameritrade on our behalf (street name). I believe the TA's records would show Ameritrade holding 4 million shares in street name but would not have our personal names attached to them.

Posts: 5729 | From: Wisconsin | Registered: Sep 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
dimndlvr
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for dimndlvr     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Now all this discussion about covering naked shorts due to the amount of O/S is very clarifying for us "newbies" one question still remains... If they are concerned about there being such a large number of O/S so that the dividend will be small or difficult to spread out to so many shares who decides and how easy would a reverse split be? I have heard of that happening in the past. Does anyone have any input on: a. how likely that would be, b. what the impact on current shareholders would be? and c. who has the final decision to make this happen? It seems that if what the majority concensus is saying is true..that CMKM is undervalued, that would be a sure way to increase the value of the stock without having to find the "motherload". Anyone have any input on this?
Posts: 5 | From: Anchorage, AK, USA | Registered: Jul 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Money_Penny
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Money_Penny     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Originally posted by Upside:
River, Money, & Gator,
I dont know, the way I read function # 1 is that the TA keeps the records in three different ways. Let's say the 4 of us all used Ameritrade and we each had 1 million shares, held by Ameritrade on our behalf (street name). I believe the TA's records would show Ameritrade holding 4 million shares in street name but would not have our personal names attached to them.

Upside, read the last sentence of function #1 again. Now that's pretty clear to me.

[This message has been edited by Money_Penny (edited July 26, 2004).]


Posts: 430 | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
GatorMan
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for GatorMan     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Originally posted by Upside:
River, Money, & Gator,
I dont know, the way I read function # 1 is that the TA keeps the records in three different ways. Let's say the 4 of us all used Ameritrade and we each had 1 million shares, held by Ameritrade on our behalf (street name). I believe the TA's records would show Ameritrade holding 4 million shares in street name but would not have our personal names attached to them.

I'd say you are absolutly correct. So when the TA sees that Ameritrade is holding 4 million shares they send the dividends to Ameritrade who then distrinbutes them to the proper accounts.

------------------
~,-,-< GatorMan


Posts: 752 | From: Springville, Utah | Registered: Jan 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
  This topic comprises 65 pages: 1  2  3  ...  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  ...  63  64  65   

Post New Topic  New Poll  
Topic Closed  Topic Closed
Open Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


Contact Us | Allstocks.com Message Board Home

© 1997 - 2021 Allstocks.com. All rights reserved.

Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.2

Share