I just wanted to post the comments to the article on the stockwatch page. This is an exact copy of what is there with no deletions. They didn't get one comment agreeing with the writer. -DebiReader Comments - Comments are open and unmoderated, although abusive remarks may be deleted. Opinions expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of Stockwatch.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What kind of one sided article is this? This sounds like something you would read in some daily rag. Please realize people this guys opinion is worth no more then anyone elses. In fact with some of the things he left out I would say to discount it all together.
Posted by WTF @ 2004-06-22 14:06
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I think this gentleman is very biased and also not at all very thorough with his reporting
Posted by Manuel A Rodriguez @ 2004-06-22 14:15
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Does the hiring of a partner from a major lawfirm such as Edwards & Angell in order to get back on the OTC as a reporting company as quickly as possible qualify as an "entertaining press release"? Or is it simply one of the many positive pieces of information about CMKM Diamonds that the author has consciously omitted because it don't conform with his desire to launch a negative smear campaign against this company?
Posted by Hmmm @ 2004-06-22 14:36
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A blatant attempt to damage CMKX is proven here in this article. It is obvious who these people work for and with the non-stated facts regarding CMKX is also proof of this.
Posted by chrisl582004 @ 2004-06-22 14:42
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Now we know why Will Purcell doesn't work at the New York Times or Wall Street Journal. And, he never will.
Posted by Harley @ 2004-06-22 14:46
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
How much were you paid by the Market Maker's Mr. Will Purcell? Good luck on your newspaper route
Posted by Lupe the Gardner @ 2004-06-22 14:51
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mr. Purcell did your mother help you get this job, because I bet she is very proud of you bashing a stock. Great article printed it for my birdcage.
Posted by Lupe the Gardner @ 2004-06-22 14:57
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Where are the lab results Mr. Purcell from the CMKM drilling? Have you seen the other lab results from the multiple other pipes? Unless you have documentation from the lab, from CMKM, or Roger Glenn, I would hold on comments. The shareholders of CMKM Diamonds are waiting for the PR and will not sell 1 stock until a PR is released by the company.
Will, Have a great day!! : )
Posted by Gjfromfla @ 2004-06-22 14:57
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Only people with journalism skills are allowed to complain about multiple explanation points!!! You don't qualify Mr. Purcell!!! lol, no wonder he's working at StockWatch!!!
Posted by Frank DeLamas @ 2004-06-22 14:59
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Be careful how you take anything from stockwatch..That website is nothing more than just another message board..This recent article is obviously one individual's writings that have not been in any newspaper..Articles like pieces of this nature is to sway shareholders to a state of uneasiness..
There are many discrepancies with this article and the main one is the lack of mentioning of the law firm..
Don't you find it interesting that there are so many news releases and quite a few what is seemed as professional writtings only to have been completely fabricated.It seems to me that certain Market Makers and not bashers are behind this endeavor..This is another sign of things getting quite worrisome for the market makers.
Folks, I view this as very exciting..
Have a good day Varok
Posted by varok @ 2004-06-22 15:00
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mr. Purcell I am sure you got paid well for this article. Probably can afford that new Parka you always wanted huh?
Posted by Lupe the Gardner @ 2004-06-22 15:04
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
It would be better journalism for StockWatch to reference sources. Conjecture and assumption are both very immature journalistic practices. Since StockWatch has chosen not to reference sources then I must conclude that most, if not all of the above assumptions made by Will Purcell are based on his knowledge alone.
"CMKM's Smeaton play began in March..." what play??? "Those plans hit a big snag..." what plans??? "a fraction even smaller than CMKM's recent share price..." journalistic freedom to be sarcastic??? "Based on earlier work on the Smeaton play, there should have been few surprises in any of the recent results form Smeaton..." source??? "As a result, what CMKM now calls its new Carolyn pipe is actually the old Smeaton kimberlite..." conjecture/fact, based on what???? "Entertaining press releases are not the only unusual quirk with CMKM..."more journalistic freedom to be sarcastic???
The fact that the De Beers Canada Corp. and Kensington Resources Ltd. group find the area to be profitable and reside as abutters to the CMKX group's property has been washed over by Will. I would think that with a little more journalistic knowledge that Will, would have found that the same pipe runs through both properties. Is Will a broker, diamond dealer, miner, SEC representative or in any way professional enough to make the assumptions made above? I think not. Will has gathered a lot of information and has then decided to use his imagination and hearsay to write a "Professional" (sic) article about a company without actually doing basic journalistic due diligence. Unbelievable all I can say. The fact that StockWatch published this article without any disclaimers at all leads me to believe that they also concur with Will's wildly imaginative assumptions. I therefore, have come to my own conclusion that StockWatch is not putting out reliable information and I must discontinue using StockWatch as information tool. Also, I feel compelled to voice my opinion to all of my stock "Buddies". Sorry and goodbye... cya wnwtby
Posted by 500andLong @ 2004-06-22 15:04
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------