But, if UC is not doing what I think.

Perhaps some of us should.

Paul

quote:

---

Originally posted by TradingWizard:
My question is and this is not directly pertaining to CMKX, is it possible for the company traded on pink sheets to pay divident.
Paul I did not mean to interrupt your flow of thought. :-) but you gave me an idea to ask the above.

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by TradingWizard:
My question is and this is not directly pertaining to CMKX, is it possible for the company traded on pink sheets to pay divident.
Paul I did not mean to interrupt your flow of thought. :-) but you gave me an idea to ask the above.

---

I think yes they can pay an dividend (pink sheets or not) but here my questions and I hope to receive an answer like this question can be very very important in my decision to buy again at 0.0001....WITH WHICH MONEY ?????......like they will have billions to pay if o/s is 500 Billions...
For the moment they have no income, a lot of expenses(drilling, car-race, expensive law firm to pay, mining material to buy or merger with mining companies so adios to take alone the benefit of coming findings....they have 2 partners for the moment with which they must share their upcoming..if any...income, drilling specialists to pay, right to protect, police to pay for protect their drilling zone...if they found something, employes to pay,trucks to buy etc etc etc etc etc

quote:

---

Originally posted by richnessforeveryone:
I think yes they can pay an dividend (pink sheets or not) but here my questions and I hope to receive an answer like this question can be very very important in my decision to buy again at 0.0001....WITH WHICH MONEY ?????......like they will have billions to pay if o/s is 500 Billions...
For the moment they have no income, a lot of expenses(drilling, car-race, expensive law firm to pay, mining material to buy or merger with mining companies so adios to take alone the benefit of coming findings....they have 2 partners for the moment with which they must share their upcoming..if any...income, drilling specialists to pay, right to protect, police to pay for protect their drilling zone...if they found something, employes to pay,trucks to buy etc etc etc etc etc

[This message has been edited by richnessforeveryone (edited June 24, 2004).]

---

richnessforeveryone you from Lux...are you near Husky Inj Molding company???

------------------
'Alone we can do so little; together we can do so much.' - Helen Keller

quote:

---

Originally posted by cool1sh:
You never get it, do you?

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by TradingWizard:
That is why companies go public, they need investors to invest in the company so they can acquire all necessary equipment or cover the expenses for the project. But also in the mining business you need to consider that it sometime takes time until the mining facility becomes profitable. Thats all I can say, may be others have more thoughts pertaining your question.

richnessforeveryone you from Lux...are you near Husky Inj Molding company???

---

Thx Trading.....
Yes I'm from Luxbg.........what is Husky Inj molding company....I don't know them..

quote:

---

Originally posted by ludinlo:
Need some help here. My advisor tells me to get out of CMKX but I just want to wait to see if they come out with a PR.

Any suggestions, please be honest

---

why do you need an advisor to trade sub-penny stocks?

CMKM SHARE CERTIFICATE DEMAND DELIVERY - IMMEDIATELY!!!
TO ALL LONGS - Asked to have the CMKM
- curried to to You a.s.a.p.!!!

JGDiefenbaker, agree there's a huge likelihood that we
will see a massive CMKX short-squeeze.

When the FBI goes in:
How do you suggest the bankster brokers will cover unlawful short
positions in the trillions of non-existant shares,
when no one is selling?

The bank/sters selling the same house 1000 times
and try to kill off the buyers
,,,before the buyers take possession?

,,,buyers should all ask for their
share certificates!!!

The CMKM to make an audit, the lawfirm will demand it!!!

bank/ster brokers will go "broke & jail" 100yrs.
if i be the judge!!!

,,and all the bashing pawn broker/partners should go to jail,,imo.

Share your suspicion with the FBI and
the naked shorting terrorists
will soon be history.

The more complaints filed with FBI,
CIA, FTC, SEC. COM. etc. the more the better.

https://tips.fbi.gov/
http://www.ftc.gov ->Click file a complaint
http://www.sec.gov/complaint/selectconduct.shtml

File your complaint, the sooner the better!
IMO Thx
Posted By: BUDDIEBuddie

JOIN ~ Companies' Rights Coalition
http://ivarkreuger.proboards32.com/index.cgi?board=Coalition&action=display&num=1087975012

Smallcap the naked short termites first target -
larger blue stocks second in line,,,

SAVE THE WORLD - short squeeeze bank/sters to 100%

Would not sell anything bellow a BUCK

NASDAQ OTC Bullertin Board Information Centre

[IMG]CMKM DIAMONDS INC: CMKX

WHY DIAMONDS IN SASKATCHEWAN ?

- One of the largest known kimberlite clusters in the world.

- 130 of the 2000 kimberlite pipes known worldwide
are macro-diamond bearing. 23 of these are located
in the Fort a la Corne district of Saskatchewan.

- 80% of Saskatchewans' kimberlite pipes are diamondiferous.

- 50% contain diamonds over one millimeter in size.

- A high percentage of diamonds recovered are clear,
inclusion-free and exhibit good crystal form.

- Pipes said to have erupted under inland sea and
therefore have not been exposed to weathering
or glaciation.

- Pipes lie within 300 feet of surface.

- Area accessible by paved all-weather road,
with water and power readily available.

- Studies indicate cash operating costs of $10.50 per tonne,
including overburden removal.

- Saskatchewan government encourages mining in the province.[/B]

http://www.otcbb.com/help/cms_includes/quote_module.htm

http://investorshub.com/boards/board.asp?board_id=1561

Further developments and other information
on the company may be viewed at our website,
http://www.casavantmining.com..

SAVE THE WESTERN WORLD - short squeeeze bank/sters to 100%

“The new rules expand the scope of the affirmative determination requirements to include orders received from broker/dealers that are not members of NASD ("non-member broker/dealers").

The new rule is on the web at http://www.nasdr.com/2610_2004.asp#04-03

The rule itself, while welcomed by small companies and their shareholders in the U.S., nevertheless raised an outcry because the NASD’s request to put it into effect!

The illegal naked shortselling fraud banksters broker's
hedge funds dictate the market for the moment and what
all should do is to make the complains to FBI, CIA to
US wipe out the pesky termites bokers pawns are
all over and bashing down all good stocks,
only promo. the banksters nt, enron, wcom, bgo, abx,
bre-x copycats, imo!!!!
Pass it along>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Thanks for info,,,

Tell us about your complaint
Please select the type of conduct that best describes your complaint:

Problems with buy or sell orders

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Problems with my brokerage firm or broker

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Manipulation of security price or volume

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Fraudulent or unregistered offer or sale of securities

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Financial privacy complaint

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Cold calling

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Problems with my investment adviser or financial planner

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Problems with my mutual fund

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Problems with 401(k), pension or retirement

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Problems with IPO allocation or eligibility

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Failure to file required reports with the SEC

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

False or misleading statements about a company (including false or misleading SEC reports or financial statements)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Fraud in the marketing of a securities trading course, program or similar product

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Other

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.sec.gov/complaint/selectconduct.shtml

I chose this one: Fraudulent or unregistered offer or sale of securities http://www.sec.gov/complaint/cf942sec9570.htm

pls get rid of the naked shortselling banksters, I don't want bankster competition imho

-------------------------------------------------------------------
shorts,,,prepare for jail,,,
and prepare to lose any lic. u hold!!!

While the FBI continues to encourage the public to submit information regarding the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, this form may also be used to report any suspected criminal activity to the FBI.

Share your suspicion with the FBI and the naked shorting terrorists will soon be history.

The more complaints filed with FBI SEC FTC etc the better.

https://tips.fbi.gov/
http://www.ftc.gov ->Click file a complaint
http://www.sec.gov/complaint/selectconduct.shtml

File your complaint, the sooner the better!
IMO Thx
Posted by: RRothschild (ID#: 469234)
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

shorts,,,prepare for jail,,,
and prepare to lose any lic. u hold!!!
While the FBI continues to encourage the public to submit information regarding the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, this form may also be used to report any suspected criminal activity to the FBI.

Share your suspicion with the FBI and the naked shorting terrorists will soon be history.

The more complaints filed with FBI SEC FTC etc the better.

https://tips.fbi.gov/
http://www.ftc.gov ->Click file a complaint
http://www.sec.gov/complaint/selectconduct.shtml

Have anyone heard of this.

quote:

---

I was reading some post on CMKX RB boards. There were talks on phone calls made to the new transfer agent in which they, new tranfer agents, mentioned that the were only 965 shareholders.
Have anyone heard of this.

The post were around 3pm EST. I will try to located some of them and post them here.

---

prdponce,
That sounds like a fairly high figure to me. We should put this issue to rest before it becomes the latest "pump". Shareholders who actually have possession of their shares, ie: the certificates, are counted as one shareholder. This could be you, me, your kids, corporations, anyone who actually possesses their shares. I own stock in the company but I do not have physical possession of my certificates. They are held in what's called "street name" at Ameritrade who is my broker. Most people elect to have their broker keep their shares in street name. What that means is that Ameritrade, E-Trade, Waterhouse, etc. all own shares on behalf of their clients. They are each counted as one shareholder. Ameritrade could have 10 billion shares held for their customers and they would still be counted as one shareholder. Very few people, or corporations for that matter, actually take physical possession of their certificates.

Thanks for the explanation. I just did not know what to make of it.

Like you said, it is probably better to leave like that and just wait for the PR.

[This message has been edited by VNGNTN1 (edited June 24, 2004).]

quote:

---

Originally posted by Upside:
Van,
I haven't either but I'll be upset if they're public record. As far as the brokers report, that one I can answer. If you and I have an account at XYZ brokerage house and we both buy shares in CMKX and elect to have them hold the certificates, we are reported as one shareholder under the name of XYZ. If there are two others who also bought shares through XYZ and requested the certificates, they are reported as two shareholders. So XYZ's report to the new transfer agent would be 2 shareholders holding xxx shares in certificate form, and XYZ corporation (representing the two of us) holding xxx shares.

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by Upside:
Will,
Read 11 posts up from your last one.

---