Allstocks.com's Bulletin Board Post New Topic  New Poll  Post A Reply
my profile login | register | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Allstocks.com's Bulletin Board » Micro Penny Stocks, Penny Stocks $0.10 & Under » CMKX II new Thread. Get it while you CAN ! (Page 71)

 - UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!   This topic comprises 76 pages: 1  2  3  ...  68  69  70  71  72  73  74  75  76   
Author Topic: CMKX II new Thread. Get it while you CAN !
VNGNTN1
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for VNGNTN1     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
PAUL
A GOOD PLAN
VAN

Posts: 1424 | From: Peoria, IL. USA | Registered: Oct 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
PAUL
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for PAUL     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I have no idea.

But, if UC is not doing what I think.

Perhaps some of us should.

Paul


quote:
Originally posted by TradingWizard:
My question is and this is not directly pertaining to CMKX, is it possible for the company traded on pink sheets to pay divident.
Paul I did not mean to interrupt your flow of thought. :-) but you gave me an idea to ask the above.


------------------
A soft answer turneth away wrath: but grievous words stir up anger.


Posts: 1056 | From: WINSTON, GA. USA | Registered: Sep 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
HarryHar
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for HarryHar     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
If I get .10 per share by XX date, and the pps drops to .0001 i could not care any less. And every year, it will pay .10 per share, I will be pretty damn happy. Am I missing something?
Posts: 212 | Registered: Jan 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
richnessforeveryone
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for richnessforeveryone     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by TradingWizard:
My question is and this is not directly pertaining to CMKX, is it possible for the company traded on pink sheets to pay divident.
Paul I did not mean to interrupt your flow of thought. :-) but you gave me an idea to ask the above.


I think yes they can pay an dividend (pink sheets or not) but here my questions and I hope to receive an answer like this question can be very very important in my decision to buy again at 0.0001....WITH WHICH MONEY ?????......like they will have billions to pay if o/s is 500 Billions...
For the moment they have no income, a lot of expenses(drilling, car-race, expensive law firm to pay, mining material to buy or merger with mining companies so adios to take alone the benefit of coming findings....they have 2 partners for the moment with which they must share their upcoming..if any...income, drilling specialists to pay, right to protect, police to pay for protect their drilling zone...if they found something, employes to pay,trucks to buy etc etc etc etc etc

[This message has been edited by richnessforeveryone (edited June 24, 2004).]


Posts: 143 | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
cool1sh
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for cool1sh     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
You never get it, do you?

quote:
Originally posted by richnessforeveryone:
I think yes they can pay an dividend (pink sheets or not) but here my questions and I hope to receive an answer like this question can be very very important in my decision to buy again at 0.0001....WITH WHICH MONEY ?????......like they will have billions to pay if o/s is 500 Billions...
For the moment they have no income, a lot of expenses(drilling, car-race, expensive law firm to pay, mining material to buy or merger with mining companies so adios to take alone the benefit of coming findings....they have 2 partners for the moment with which they must share their upcoming..if any...income, drilling specialists to pay, right to protect, police to pay for protect their drilling zone...if they found something, employes to pay,trucks to buy etc etc etc etc etc

[This message has been edited by richnessforeveryone (edited June 24, 2004).]



Posts: 722 | From: Atlanta | Registered: Feb 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
TradingWizard
Member


Icon 12 posted      Profile for TradingWizard         Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
That is why companies go public, they need investors to invest in the company so they can acquire all necessary equipment or cover the expenses for the project. But also in the mining business you need to consider that it sometime takes time until the mining facility becomes profitable. Thats all I can say, may be others have more thoughts pertaining your question.

richnessforeveryone you from Lux...are you near Husky Inj Molding company???

------------------
'Alone we can do so little; together we can do so much.' - Helen Keller

[This message has been edited by TradingWizard (edited June 24, 2004).]


Posts: 1021 | From: Canada | Registered: Feb 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
richnessforeveryone
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for richnessforeveryone     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by cool1sh:
You never get it, do you?


I never get what ???
Dividends ?????
Yes I think that we all will be old old mans when we will see the first dividend cents....My opinion.


Posts: 143 | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
richnessforeveryone
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for richnessforeveryone     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by TradingWizard:
That is why companies go public, they need investors to invest in the company so they can acquire all necessary equipment or cover the expenses for the project. But also in the mining business you need to consider that it sometime takes time until the mining facility becomes profitable. Thats all I can say, may be others have more thoughts pertaining your question.

richnessforeveryone you from Lux...are you near Husky Inj Molding company???


Thx Trading.....
Yes I'm from Luxbg.........what is Husky Inj molding company....I don't know them..

[This message has been edited by richnessforeveryone (edited June 24, 2004).]


Posts: 143 | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
TradingWizard
Member


Icon 12 posted      Profile for TradingWizard         Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Oh well, just thought you may know...good luck with trading :-))

[This message has been edited by TradingWizard (edited June 24, 2004).]


Posts: 1021 | From: Canada | Registered: Feb 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
FJEAN2
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for FJEAN2     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by ludinlo:
Need some help here. My advisor tells me to get out of CMKX but I just want to wait to see if they come out with a PR.

Any suggestions, please be honest


why do you need an advisor to trade sub-penny stocks?

------------------
IN SUB-PENNY WE TRUST


Posts: 39 | From: Pompano Beach, Florida | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
tradingpennys
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for tradingpennys     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
CMKX Chatroom
Description: Shareholders of CMKM Diamonds http://www.cmkx.net

Posts: 415 | From: CA | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Upside
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for Upside     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Van,
Did you ever look into if the Domestic Reports are public information or not? I meant to do it today at work but never got the chance.

Posts: 5729 | From: Wisconsin | Registered: Sep 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
tradingpennys
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for tradingpennys     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
http://webferret.search.com/click?wf,cmkm+diamonds,,ivarkreuger.proboards32.com%2F,,aol

CMKM SHARE CERTIFICATE DEMAND DELIVERY - IMMEDIATELY!!!
TO ALL LONGS - Asked to have the CMKM
- curried to to You a.s.a.p.!!!

JGDiefenbaker, agree there's a huge likelihood that we
will see a massive CMKX short-squeeze.

When the FBI goes in:
How do you suggest the bankster brokers will cover unlawful short
positions in the trillions of non-existant shares,
when no one is selling?

The bank/sters selling the same house 1000 times
and try to kill off the buyers
,,,before the buyers take possession?

,,,buyers should all ask for their
share certificates!!!

The CMKM to make an audit, the lawfirm will demand it!!!

bank/ster brokers will go "broke & jail" 100yrs.
if i be the judge!!!

,,and all the bashing pawn broker/partners should go to jail,,imo.


Share your suspicion with the FBI and
the naked shorting terrorists
will soon be history.

The more complaints filed with FBI,
CIA, FTC, SEC. COM. etc. the more the better.

https://tips.fbi.gov/
http://www.ftc.gov ->Click file a complaint
http://www.sec.gov/complaint/selectconduct.shtml

File your complaint, the sooner the better!
IMO Thx
Posted By: BUDDIEBuddie

JOIN ~ Companies' Rights Coalition
http://ivarkreuger.proboards32.com/index.cgi?board=Coalition&action=display&num=1087975012

Smallcap the naked short termites first target -
larger blue stocks second in line,,,

SAVE THE WORLD - short squeeeze bank/sters to 100%

Would not sell anything bellow a BUCK

NASDAQ OTC Bullertin Board Information Centre

[IMG]CMKM DIAMONDS INC: CMKX

WHY DIAMONDS IN SASKATCHEWAN ?

- One of the largest known kimberlite clusters in the world.

- 130 of the 2000 kimberlite pipes known worldwide
are macro-diamond bearing. 23 of these are located
in the Fort a la Corne district of Saskatchewan.

- 80% of Saskatchewans' kimberlite pipes are diamondiferous.

- 50% contain diamonds over one millimeter in size.

- A high percentage of diamonds recovered are clear,
inclusion-free and exhibit good crystal form.

- Pipes said to have erupted under inland sea and
therefore have not been exposed to weathering
or glaciation.

- Pipes lie within 300 feet of surface.

- Area accessible by paved all-weather road,
with water and power readily available.

- Studies indicate cash operating costs of $10.50 per tonne,
including overburden removal.

- Saskatchewan government encourages mining in the province.[/B]

http://www.otcbb.com/help/cms_includes/quote_module.htm

http://investorshub.com/boards/board.asp?board_id=1561

Further developments and other information
on the company may be viewed at our website,
http://www.casavantmining.com..

SAVE THE WESTERN WORLD - short squeeeze bank/sters to 100%

“The new rules expand the scope of the affirmative determination requirements to include orders received from broker/dealers that are not members of NASD ("non-member broker/dealers").

The new rule is on the web at http://www.nasdr.com/2610_2004.asp#04-03

The rule itself, while welcomed by small companies and their shareholders in the U.S., nevertheless raised an outcry because the NASD’s request to put it into effect!

The illegal naked shortselling fraud banksters broker's
hedge funds dictate the market for the moment and what
all should do is to make the complains to FBI, CIA to
US wipe out the pesky termites bokers pawns are
all over and bashing down all good stocks,
only promo. the banksters nt, enron, wcom, bgo, abx,
bre-x copycats, imo!!!!
Pass it along>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Thanks for info,,,

Tell us about your complaint
Please select the type of conduct that best describes your complaint:

Problems with buy or sell orders

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Problems with my brokerage firm or broker

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Manipulation of security price or volume

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Fraudulent or unregistered offer or sale of securities

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Financial privacy complaint

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Cold calling

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Problems with my investment adviser or financial planner

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Problems with my mutual fund

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Problems with 401(k), pension or retirement

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Problems with IPO allocation or eligibility

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Failure to file required reports with the SEC

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

False or misleading statements about a company (including false or misleading SEC reports or financial statements)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Fraud in the marketing of a securities trading course, program or similar product

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Other

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.sec.gov/complaint/selectconduct.shtml


I chose this one: Fraudulent or unregistered offer or sale of securities http://www.sec.gov/complaint/cf942sec9570.htm

pls get rid of the naked shortselling banksters, I don't want bankster competition imho

-------------------------------------------------------------------
shorts,,,prepare for jail,,,
and prepare to lose any lic. u hold!!!

While the FBI continues to encourage the public to submit information regarding the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, this form may also be used to report any suspected criminal activity to the FBI.

Share your suspicion with the FBI and the naked shorting terrorists will soon be history.

The more complaints filed with FBI SEC FTC etc the better.

https://tips.fbi.gov/
http://www.ftc.gov ->Click file a complaint
http://www.sec.gov/complaint/selectconduct.shtml

File your complaint, the sooner the better!
IMO Thx
Posted by: RRothschild (ID#: 469234)
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

shorts,,,prepare for jail,,,
and prepare to lose any lic. u hold!!!
While the FBI continues to encourage the public to submit information regarding the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, this form may also be used to report any suspected criminal activity to the FBI.

Share your suspicion with the FBI and the naked shorting terrorists will soon be history.

The more complaints filed with FBI SEC FTC etc the better.

https://tips.fbi.gov/
http://www.ftc.gov ->Click file a complaint
http://www.sec.gov/complaint/selectconduct.shtml

File your complaint, the sooner the better!
IMO Thx
Some part from other board Posted
By: BUDDIEBuddie thank You.


Posts: 415 | From: CA | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
thinkmoney
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for thinkmoney     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
another scam? this usa is terific.. where firms like qbid and cmkx can steal our money and we let them. but in this democaracy it is legal.
Posts: 864 | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Prdponce
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Prdponce         Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I was reading some post on CMKX RB boards. There were talks on phone calls made to the new transfer agent in which they, new tranfer agents, mentioned that the were only 965 shareholders.

Have anyone heard of this.

The post were around 3pm EST. I will try to located some of them and post them here.


Posts: 5120 | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Prdponce
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Prdponce         Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
By: abadgoodgirl
24 Jun 2004, 03:32 PM EDT
Msg. 328855 of 329784
Jump to msg. #
Pacific transfer has received the list of the 900 shareholders and knows the amount o/s according to a true and certified statement made by the old transfer company but that Pacific wouldn't release it until they entered the information into their database.

He said for example, when shares are retired, Treasury Shares, they have a program that calculates o/s whenever something changes with o/s.
- - - - -
View Replies »


Posts: 5120 | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
HarryHar
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for HarryHar     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
makemerich
Member posted June 24, 2004 15:57
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
More O/S info : http://cmkx.proboards34.com/index.cgi?board=general&action=display&num=1088107527

There's the link to the RB site about the number of existing shareholders. Whether it's true or not that there about 970 shareholders, it gives no indication of how many shares are outstanding. Some may be holding 500 Million +, and some only 500,000.


Posts: 212 | Registered: Jan 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Upside
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for Upside     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
originally posted by prdponce:
quote:
I was reading some post on CMKX RB boards. There were talks on phone calls made to the new transfer agent in which they, new tranfer agents, mentioned that the were only 965 shareholders.
Have anyone heard of this.

The post were around 3pm EST. I will try to located some of them and post them here.


prdponce,
That sounds like a fairly high figure to me. We should put this issue to rest before it becomes the latest "pump". Shareholders who actually have possession of their shares, ie: the certificates, are counted as one shareholder. This could be you, me, your kids, corporations, anyone who actually possesses their shares. I own stock in the company but I do not have physical possession of my certificates. They are held in what's called "street name" at Ameritrade who is my broker. Most people elect to have their broker keep their shares in street name. What that means is that Ameritrade, E-Trade, Waterhouse, etc. all own shares on behalf of their clients. They are each counted as one shareholder. Ameritrade could have 10 billion shares held for their customers and they would still be counted as one shareholder. Very few people, or corporations for that matter, actually take physical possession of their certificates.



Posts: 5729 | From: Wisconsin | Registered: Sep 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Prdponce
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Prdponce         Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Upside

Thanks for the explanation. I just did not know what to make of it.

Like you said, it is probably better to leave like that and just wait for the PR.


Posts: 5120 | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
TradingWizard
Member


Icon 12 posted      Profile for TradingWizard         Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Upside good post. I actually thought that I have the certificate, but what I have the purchase slip from TDWaterhouse. Thanks.

------------------
'Alone we can do so little; together we can do so much.' - Helen Keller


Posts: 1021 | From: Canada | Registered: Feb 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
VNGNTN1
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for VNGNTN1     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
ALL
Ameritrade has assured me that what they show in my account does not require me to obtain a certificate. I have verified this twice and mentioned ot was a concern. They claim THERE IS NO PROBLEM.
VAN

Posts: 1424 | From: Peoria, IL. USA | Registered: Oct 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Upside
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for Upside     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Van,
I'm not saying you have to have your certificates. All I'm saying is that you, me, and everyone else at Ameritrade, or any other brokerage house, who doesn't possess their certificates are lumped into one as one shareholder when they send their information to the transfer agent.

Posts: 5729 | From: Wisconsin | Registered: Sep 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
WWJD-thru-me
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for WWJD-thru-me     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Seems like we will be getting the news we have been looking forward to. Anyone who is worried about their investment better hurry up and sell before it becomes a 10 bagger or better. Anyone who wants to complain should also try to hurry up and do it. We will probably be getting some excellent news soon and it will be difficult to trash the company when everyone is smiling and planning how to spend their profits. I'm still buying if they are still selling. The end of the old CMKX sale is coming. The price was not budging today even with a little help from Stockpatrol. It was a little help-they have used it too many times to be a big help. GLTA-IMO-DD-Debi There really is nothing new to say pro or con. The transfer agent has the paperwork and we will all have our news soon. The buzz at the unoffical CMKX board is incredibly positive. I read there and wished I bought more. I look over here and it looks like a funeral. It is but for the MM's not the shareholders. This is my opinion. -Debi
Posts: 1188 | From: Clinton, MA 01510 | Registered: Jan 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Upside
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for Upside     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Debi,
What's your opinion of the almost 1,000 shareholders?

Posts: 5729 | From: Wisconsin | Registered: Sep 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
VNGNTN1
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for VNGNTN1     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
UPSIDE
Have not had time to run down state forms.
Don't know how broker consolidates report, just letting new folks they probably need not worry.
VAN

Posts: 1424 | From: Peoria, IL. USA | Registered: Oct 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
will
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for will     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I am going to reserve comment, judgement until I see the 'promised' PR. I don't want to be disappointed, or seem like I'm whining if my speculation doesn't agree with everyone else's opinion. No one knows what it will be at this point, so I wait and see.
Posts: 4893 | From: Burbank IL USA | Registered: Feb 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Upside
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for Upside     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Van,
I haven't either but I'll be upset if they're public record. As far as the brokers report, that one I can answer. If you and I have an account at XYZ brokerage house and we both buy shares in CMKX and elect to have them hold the certificates, we are reported as one shareholder under the name of XYZ. If there are two others who also bought shares through XYZ and requested the certificates, they are reported as two shareholders. So XYZ's report to the new transfer agent would be 2 shareholders holding xxx shares in certificate form, and XYZ corporation (representing the two of us) holding xxx shares.

Posts: 5729 | From: Wisconsin | Registered: Sep 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
VNGNTN1
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for VNGNTN1     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
ACTUALLY
Iv'e seen three estimates of shareholders today. low 700 high 970. The 75 CMKX holders have 1bn.
VAN
PS 700+970=1670/2=835avg
835/75=11.133bn(Rough Extrapolation from fragmented rumors within the last few days by posters notorius for familiarity with inuendo and hope)

[This message has been edited by VNGNTN1 (edited June 24, 2004).]

[This message has been edited by VNGNTN1 (edited June 24, 2004).]


Posts: 1424 | From: Peoria, IL. USA | Registered: Oct 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
will
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for will     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
< 1,000 shareholders seems awefully light to me. Especially when I talked to my brother, who lives in New Orleans, that hardly plays stock, and I mentioned CMKX, and he said, yea, all the guys at work are on it.
quote:
Originally posted by Upside:
Van,
I haven't either but I'll be upset if they're public record. As far as the brokers report, that one I can answer. If you and I have an account at XYZ brokerage house and we both buy shares in CMKX and elect to have them hold the certificates, we are reported as one shareholder under the name of XYZ. If there are two others who also bought shares through XYZ and requested the certificates, they are reported as two shareholders. So XYZ's report to the new transfer agent would be 2 shareholders holding xxx shares in certificate form, and XYZ corporation (representing the two of us) holding xxx shares.


Posts: 4893 | From: Burbank IL USA | Registered: Feb 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Upside
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for Upside     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Will,
Read 11 posts up from your last one.

Posts: 5729 | From: Wisconsin | Registered: Sep 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
will
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for will     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
So, considering that the brokerages hold shares collectively for investors and report as 1 holder, and add those that are in receipt of their certificates into their count, you think 965 is too large a number?
Well the agent might have known that when he told this guy, but did the guy. So, interpreted one way the number is too small, and the other too great. lol Just more mystery added to this situation. Is there anything that isn't a debate with this stock? Maybe clear, detailed, forthright, information from them would help us investor sort things out properly, and quit saying IMO, and instead say reference such and such a PR, it's a fact.
quote:
Originally posted by Upside:
Will,
Read 11 posts up from your last one.


Posts: 4893 | From: Burbank IL USA | Registered: Feb 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Upside
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for Upside     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Here's how I interpret it. Let's say 20% of the investors request their certificates. That takes the number down to 700 or so. That 700 would be comprised of national, regional, and local brokerage houses. That sounds like a large number to me. I have no idea what number you would multiply by 700 to get an estimated total but it could be an outrageous amount.
Posts: 5729 | From: Wisconsin | Registered: Sep 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
WWJD-thru-me
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for WWJD-thru-me     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Upside-I know you are right about if we both have shares with the same broker they would be held in his name and counted as one. So 965 means there are a lot of people who must have requested certificates for their shares. Makes me curious what the outstanding shares are supposed to be versus what is floating around naked. I read a speculation I enjoyed tonight that said UC bought 1 trillion shares himself. If he did it will be a riot to see how this plays out. He can issue a dividend, buyout offer or ? I have heard this rumor in various forms. One was he had people buy in different names. I wonder if people bought certificates and then he bought them directly from them. One thing is certain. We will find out soon. I am very excited about the possibilities and totally curious. If I put myself in UC's shoes and had seen people trying to ruin my company and my dreams and I had something I could do about it-I would. I am glad I loaded up and think it has to be worth more than 1/50 of a penny. GLTA-IMO-Debi
Posts: 1188 | From: Clinton, MA 01510 | Registered: Jan 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Highwaychild
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for Highwaychild     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
It's like an old ugly dog everybody likes to kick around.But every dog has it's day.
Posts: 2634 | From: The highway | Registered: Feb 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Upside
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for Upside     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Debi,
I don't want to call into question your naked short theory because that's another issue, but do you have a handle on what percentage of people actually request their shares? I can't believe that it's that many although it might be higher with this stock. I realize I'm kind of grasping and speculating here but it would be an interesting statistic to know.

Posts: 5729 | From: Wisconsin | Registered: Sep 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
  This topic comprises 76 pages: 1  2  3  ...  68  69  70  71  72  73  74  75  76   

Quick Reply
Message:

HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.

Instant Graemlins
   


Post New Topic  New Poll  Post A Reply Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


Contact Us | Allstocks.com Message Board Home

© 1997 - 2019 Allstocks.com. All rights reserved.

Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.2

Share