posted
Just called Q-TV (760#), some lady answered (sounds like hotline voice). I just asked abt the soft launch, she said its on since this morning. Couldn't talk to her for a long time as I am at work. So I guess its successful. I didn't see the signal myself tho.
I remember couple of months ago, somebody posted saying he can see the soft launch signal as he works for a cable company. Not sure if that person sold the stock or still has it.
quote:Originally posted by Jo-Kool: IS anybody geting the signal yet? please post if you have seen anything yet.
thanks
[This message has been edited by cool1sh (edited June 01, 2004).]
Posts: 722 | From: Atlanta | Registered: Feb 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
Are we generalizing the hard launch as July 1st or has "Q" actually said July 1st?
Posts: 395 | From: Grand Rapids MI 49546 | Registered: Feb 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
Hey all, Just talked with Diana. She is incognito to Indy to catch her flight. She didn't get on the computer after 2 a.m. when she was trying to find her otherself to shave her legs. She wants me to get all the questions together for her and the meeting with Frank tomorrow at 1:00 EST. She also informed me that she has a meeting with Time Warner's Bill Hicks next week. Bill is going to explain to her what the 10 year contract means in detail. She is to call in the morning to get this meeting time set and will let me know about that after her phone call with him. So keep the questions coming and I will let her know all your concerns, etc. when I talk with her this evening. GLA!!
Posts: 455 | Registered: Feb 2004
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Deg's wife: Hey all, Just talked with Diana. She is incognito to Indy to catch her flight. She didn't get on the computer after 2 a.m. when she was trying to find her otherself to shave her legs. She wants me to get all the questions together for her and the meeting with Frank tomorrow at 1:00 EST. She also informed me that she has a meeting with Time Warner's Bill Hicks next week. Bill is going to explain to her what the 10 year contract means in detail. She is to call in the morning to get this meeting time set and will let me know about that after her phone call with him. So keep the questions coming and I will let her know all your concerns, etc. when I talk with her this evening. GLA!!
Incognito? She's traveling under an assumed name? Did you mean incommunicado?
Thanks for the update in any event. Hope she gets us some good information.
- IS Q PLANNING A PARTNERSHIP/MERGER WITH ANY OTHER UPCOMING OR PRESENTLY EXISTING NETWORK LIKE LOGO/PRIDEVISION ETC? ARE THEY IN FRIENDLY COMMUNICATIONS WITH THOSE UPCOMING COMPETITORS?
- IS Q PLANNING TO RESELL THEIR EXCLUSIVE PROGRAMS SUCH AS THE "I DO" DOCUMENTARY TO OTHER GAY NETWORKS AND IF SO DO THEY PLAN THAT THIS WILL PROVIDE THEM SECONDARY REVENUE? WHO ARE THEIR PRODUCTION PARTNERS?
- ARE THERE ANY "SILENT INVESTORS/PARTNERS" SPECIFICALLY IN Q THAT HAVE NOT YET BEEN ANNOUNCED?
- DOES FRANK PLAN TO CONTINUE THE SIGNAL FROM THE INTELSAT SATELLITE OR CHANGE BROADCASTING SIGNALS IN TIME FOR THE JULY HARD LAUNCH OR IN THE FUTURE?
- HAVE THEY MAPPED OUT A PR STRATEGY WITH DEVENEY OR ARE THEY "PLAYING IT BY EAR?"
- OBVIOUSLY, R/S, O/S ETC INFO.. WHEN WILL IT BE MADE PUBLIC?
- AT WHAT POINT DO THEY FORESEE, GIVEN THE CURRENT ADVERTISER RESPONSE, CHANGING FROM A PAID-SUBSCRIPTION NETWORK TO AN ADVERTISER-SUPPORTED NETWORK?
- DO THEY HAVE RESEARCHERS READING UP IN INVESTOR'S FORUMS OR IS IT NECESSARY FOR US TO EMAIL THEM DIRECTLY WITH OUR CONCERNS?
quote:Originally posted by Deg's wife: Hey all, Just talked with Diana. She is incognito to Indy to catch her flight. She didn't get on the computer after 2 a.m. when she was trying to find her otherself to shave her legs. She wants me to get all the questions together for her and the meeting with Frank tomorrow at 1:00 EST. She also informed me that she has a meeting with Time Warner's Bill Hicks next week. Bill is going to explain to her what the 10 year contract means in detail. She is to call in the morning to get this meeting time set and will let me know about that after her phone call with him. So keep the questions coming and I will let her know all your concerns, etc. when I talk with her this evening. GLA!!
posted
I have all the above questions copied and pasted on Wordpad and got room for lots more. Diana is/sounds sooo excited. Kinda reminded me of a mom telling her kid "Let's go to the candy shop and I'll buy you all the candy you want!!" Maybe we could call Frank and have him to meet her at the airport with a chocolate covered pickle and an autographed turkey baster?? Keep the questions coming!! Posts: 455 | Registered: Feb 2004
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Deg's wife: I have all the above questions copied and pasted on Wordpad and got room for lots more.
Now that we are looking at picking up advertisers and cable companies this month since we have a live product out there, I would like to know if we have a goal or plan yet to move out of being a 'Pink Sheet' stock?
TIA, Joey
Posts: 58 | From: Oceanside, CA USA | Registered: May 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
On the hotline, she did say that they will be doing the "soft launch" for 30 days before the hard launch. I wouldn't really consider that confirmation of a July 1 hard launch, but that seems to be what she was implying.
Kev
Posts: 78 | From: beaufort, sc, usa | Registered: Aug 2003
| IP: Logged |
posted
actually, didn't they say something on the hotline about a july 1st launch about a week or two ago?? i seem to remember something like that, so i don't think that date is just speculation.
Posts: 14 | From: berkeley, ca, USA | Registered: Apr 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
Q-TV JUST LANDED IN LOGO TV's SHADOW. IF YOU A SERIOUS (QBID) SHAREHOLDER, YOU'LL GO OUT OF YOUR WAY TO HELP SPREAD THE WORD AROUND. I'M SURE THERE'S A GOOD NUMBER OF GAYS AND LESBIANS THAT HAVE HEARD OF LOGO TV. SO, COME ON GUYS LET US GLUE OUR HEADS TOGETHER AND SPREAD THE "Q" WORD AROUND.
_________________________ I SUPPORT QBID BY HOLDING 6.5 MILLION SHARES SINCE 0.0001
posted
A little straight information for all, direct from the SEC website. Information retreived by person or persons from direct conversations with officers of the corporation and/or their assigns can be easily interpeted as illegal insider trading. to wit....
Illegal insider trading refers generally to buying or selling a security, in breach of a fiduciary duty or other relationship of trust and confidence, while in possession of material, nonpublic information about the security. Insider trading violations may also include "tipping" such information, securities trading by the person "tipped," and securities trading by those who misappropriate such information.
Examples of insider trading cases that have been brought by the SEC are cases against:
* Corporate officers, directors, and employees who traded the corporation's securities after learning of significant, confidential corporate developments;
* Friends, business associates, family members, and other "tippees" of such officers, directors, and employees, who traded the securities after receiving such information;
* Employees of law, banking, brokerage and printing firms who were given such information to provide services to the corporation whose securities they traded;
* Government employees who learned of such information because of their employment by the government; and
* Other persons who misappropriated, and took advantage of, confidential information from their employers.
Because insider trading undermines investor confidence in the fairness and integrity of the securities markets, the SEC has treated the detection and prosecution of insider trading violations as one of its enforcement priorities.
The SEC adopted new Rules 10b5-1 and 10b5-2 to resolve two insider trading issues where the courts have disagreed. Rule 10b5-1 provides that a person trades on the basis of material nonpublic information if a trader is "aware" of the material nonpublic information when making the purchase or sale. The rule also sets forth several affirmative defenses or exceptions to liability. The rule permits persons to trade in certain specified circumstances where it is clear that the information they are aware of is not a factor in the decision to trade, such as pursuant to a pre-existing plan, contract, or instruction that was made in good faith.
Rule 10b5-2 clarifies how the misappropriation theory applies to certain non-business relationships. This rule provides that a person receiving confidential information under circumstances specified in the rule would owe a duty of trust or confidence and thus could be liable under the misappropriation theory.
For more information about insider trading, please read Insider Trading—A U.S. Perspective, a speech by staff of the SEC. http://www.sec.gov/answers/insider.htm
Be very careful people, sometimes too much information can be very bad.
posted
We're relying solely on the cable companies to carry us! I hope and pray! Can someone post the reasons why they would want to. I know 1 of them would be the money..Wouldn't a station like this generate a ton of money for the cable companies? Also another thing to think about is..All 10,000 cable companies will not carry "Q"..Even if 10 want to carry it..We're in. PPS has to go up! Now imagine if 100 cable/satelite companies carry us..Then imagine 1000 companies in the near future. Thats when PPS will be over $4. For now - Lets get 1!!!
[This message has been edited by 1BigTip (edited June 01, 2004).]
posted
I really cant understand why it went down today. Soft launch is a go. Hard launch is coming up. Just a bit frustrated I suppose.
Posts: 19 | From: CA | Registered: May 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
Dragonmaster, This doesn't follow what Diana is doing for all of us, is it? I don't want her or me doing anything that could jeopardize "Q"!! I wouldn't take what she is trying to find out as inside info or anything else. I need some advice. Any attorney in the room?..lol Someone, HELLLLPPPPPPP Posts: 455 | Registered: Feb 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
I think some cable companies, especially the major ones, are afraid of a boycott from their anti-homosexual customers. Too bad Q doesn't carry the punching power LOGO does. Q is going to have to fight its way up. Without the help of all the QBID shareholder, we may be in SUB-DOLLAR land for a while. Q NEEDS HELP BAD OR ELSE I THINK WE"LL REMAIN IN LOGO's SHADOW. SHAREHOLDERS NEED TO CALL THEIR LOCAL NEWSPAPERS TO SPREAD THE WORD "Q is alive".
STUPID QUESTION? OUR VOLUME TAKE A DIVE DAILY WHICH MAKE ME WONDER IF ALL THE DAYTRADERS FLEEING QBID OR IF MOST QBID SHAREHOLDERS GOING LONG.
------------------------ HOLDING QBID 6.5 MILLION LONG AND STRONG HOLDING CMKX 51 MILLION LONG AND STRONG
------------------ [color=blue]IN SUB-PENNY WE TRUST[/color]
quote:Originally posted by Booty Quest: Please do NOT respond to new2. He will make tons of moronic statements all day. He just like to get people riled up. Most likely one of the idiots who recently left the board.
LOL... there ARE a few possibilities.. and I swear that it's not me!
Posts: 1885 | From: Tampa, FL, US | Registered: Mar 2004
| IP: Logged |