quote:Originally posted by Wit: And,...what 'news' would that be?
BTW- that poster you're speaking of was one of the biggest pumpers responsible for the first pump & dump scam. {I'm guessing he has ties to the company}.
I can't believe some of you guys are still listening to him. I guess you gotta lose every 'last dime' before ya *get it*.
Caveat Emptor = "Let the buyer beware".
-------------------- LIFE IS 10% HOW YOU MAKE IT AND 90% HOW YOU TAKE IT! Posts: 9276 | From: San Diego CA | Registered: Jul 2006
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by dollar13: BEWARE OF "SLJB" IHUB PAID BASHERS AS WELL
janniebgood janice shell whistles Disinterested One EarnestDD .... DON'T KNOW HIS NEW ALIAS colorfull1 rookeeper marketmann Melvin Chizedek DownWithPumpers lampman uknowimright TheFraudStopper sandbath
I MISSED A COUPLE OF THEM
LOL
~Don't forget to add 'the worm06' ~.
He has a website telling all about Sulja and the whole scam.
Latest Question:
Tuesday, July 31, 2007 [SLJB]: Who is Peter W. Barton and what is his involvement with the promotion of the massive fraud at Sulja Bros. Building Supplies, Ltd.? { Soon To Be Answered }
http://theworm06.b l o gspot.com/2007/07/sljb-who-is-peter-w-barton-and-what-is.html
(Take the spaces out, can't post that word here)
I suggest all holders of this stay on top of this.
-------------------- ~You aren't wealthy until you have something money can't buy.~ Posts: 3070 | From: CT | Registered: Apr 2006
| IP: Logged |
The_worm06 Research Department predicts that SLJB will NOT complete, and therefore not release, the long over-due Audited Financials for Sulja Bros. Building Supplies, Ltd. (both Nevada and Ontario corporations) before December 31, 2007.
-------------------- ~You aren't wealthy until you have something money can't buy.~ Posts: 3070 | From: CT | Registered: Apr 2006
| IP: Logged |
You didn't tell us that you were a part of Wormie's B l o g.
Thursday, July 19, 2007 [SLJB]: After pumping and hyping for months, investor Grande25 finally admits that scam company SLJB could very well be a fraud.
quote:Originally posted by Grande25: did Airys418 news come out yet?
the paid pumper?? imo
Here's The Promoter:
Thursday, July 05, 2007 [SLJB]: Promoter Ricardo J. Fernandez (Airys418) announces that SLJB is not such a good investment after all....
He has also sold a large part of his SLJB holdings and deleted all of his prior posted messages on the Airys Treehouse promotional board for SLJB, which consisted mostly of pump and hype statements.
It seems that part of his actions are a reactiion to phone calls received from the Canadian/U.S. authorities investigating SLJB and its officers and consultants.
I used up the measly 15 posts a day that ihub gives everyone so I can't go back & forth with you there anymore today. [I refuse to sign up on that 'pumpers haven'].
But, if you would like to continue over here I more than welcome your responses .
-------------------- ~You aren't wealthy until you have something money can't buy.~ Posts: 3070 | From: CT | Registered: Apr 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
I have to copy almost every post I make so I can send it to the main admin people when they delete me. just a joke imo. And nope, not paying for the bs there dat's fer sher!
-------------------- All post are my opinion. Do your own DD. Who's clicking your buy/sell button!? Posts: 7800 | From: Virginia | Registered: May 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
I got a few in there. should start a poll to see if anyone thinks they'll get rid of the Caveat Emptor = "Let the buyer beware".
when is the movie coming out??
-------------------- All post are my opinion. Do your own DD. Who's clicking your buy/sell button!? Posts: 7800 | From: Virginia | Registered: May 2006
| IP: Logged |
Of all the bs pos non moving worthless pinks I have only sulja is in this category. The others are showing the stop sign. And no, i do not have any sulja. made green on that last year!
-------------------- All post are my opinion. Do your own DD. Who's clicking your buy/sell button!? Posts: 7800 | From: Virginia | Registered: May 2006
| IP: Logged |
Of all the bs pos non moving worthless pinks I have only sulja is in this category. The others are showing the stop sign. And no, i do not have any sulja. made green on that last year!
OK GOT IT, HOWEVER A (No Information, (STOP SIGN) COMPANY CAN VERY WELL BE AT ONE STEP FOR BEING A Caveat Emptor (Buyer Beware) CORRECT. AND "SLJB" ALREADY IS THE WORST POS PINK OF THE WORLD LOL ,IF YOU GO BY THE PINKSHEETS.COM WEB SITE IMO How Does A Company Get Out of This Category? A company may be removed from this category once it meets the qualifications for the Current Information category and Pink Sheets is satisfied that there is no longer a public interest concern. In order to make this determination, Pink Sheets may require the issuer to provide additional information NEXT MONTH "SLJB" COULD HAVE A "STOP SIGN" AS WELL LOL.
ALL THOSE CATEGORIES COULD CHANGE AT ANY TIME
FWIW
I AM DONE WITH THE "PINKSHEETS.COM" BIG ISSUE
[ August 05, 2007, 15:49: Message edited by: dollar13 ]
Posts: 4112 | Registered: Jun 2006
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by dollar13: ALL THOSE CATEGORIES COULD CHANGE AT ANY TIME
FWIW
I AM DONE WITH THE "PINKSHEETS.COM" BIG ISSUE
The otcqx has provided ample opportunity for many of the pinks to shine imo. Satisfying their requirements would be an easy stepping stone.
"Current Information - Indicates reporting companies that submit filings to regulators with powers of review and that make the filings publicly available or non-reporting companies that make current information publicly available on the Pink Sheets News Service. The Current Information category is based on the level of disclosure and is not a designation of quality or investment risk. This category includes shell or development stage companies with little or no operations as well as companies without audited financials and as such should be considered extremely speculative by investors."
Clearly a scam can still get a "current information" and the PS logo. We'll see just how many actually take that step.
-------------------- All post are my opinion. Do your own DD. Who's clicking your buy/sell button!? Posts: 7800 | From: Virginia | Registered: May 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
Any speculation about the 200,000,000 shares claimed to be the A/S of SLJB Nevada in the Michigan document? I'm thinking foreshadowing of R/S, Merger/Share restructuring, or... Type-O error??
Also, it's nice to see the State of Michigan considers SLJB in good standing.
I just got off the phone with the TA, talked to Diane (503-227-2950) and she told me she could not give me any information as to the A/S or the share structure at all. I explained to her that I'd received this information in the past and that what she was telling me made it sound like the TA had been gagged again. She told me that Aarron may have more information about this as he was primary point of contact on this account. I left a voicemail message with Aaron, included my phone number, and hope to get a call back on this.
I explained to Diana and Aaron about the reason for my question: A/S was reported as 725,000,000 and a Michigan document now claims A/S of 200,000,000.
Diana was nice enough to offer a number to SLJB but it was the same number we all have x2881.
quote:Originally posted by Grande25: Any speculation about the 200,000,000 shares claimed to be the A/S of SLJB Nevada in the Michigan document? I'm thinking foreshadowing of R/S, Merger/Share restructuring, or... Type-O error??
Also, it's nice to see the State of Michigan considers SLJB in good standing.
I just got off the phone with the TA, talked to Diane (503-227-2950) and she told me she could not give me any information as to the A/S or the share structure at all. I explained to her that I'd received this information in the past and that what she was telling me made it sound like the TA had been gagged again. She told me that Aarron may have more information about this as he was primary point of contact on this account. I left a voicemail message with Aaron, included my phone number, and hope to get a call back on this.
I explained to Diana and Aaron about the reason for my question: A/S was reported as 725,000,000 and a Michigan document now claims A/S of 200,000,000.
Diana was nice enough to offer a number to SLJB but it was the same number we all have x2881.
Previous Stock Value: Par Value Shares: 800,000,000 Value: $ 0.001 No Par Value Shares: 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------- Total Authorized Capital: $ 800,000.00 New Stock Value: Par Value Shares: 725,000,000 Value: $ 0.001 No Par Value Shares: 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------- Total Authorized Capital: $ 725,000.00
interesting though......
Why do you suppose the sec of state signed BEFORE Sulja did??
-------------------- All post are my opinion. Do your own DD. Who's clicking your buy/sell button!? Posts: 7800 | From: Virginia | Registered: May 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
Oh, btw, the reason you see 200,000,000 is because it was the initial share value.
Action Type: Articles of Incorporation Document Number: 20050133666-72 # of Pages: 4 File Date: 04/19/2005 Effective Date: Initial Stock Value: Par Value Shares: 200,000,000 Value: $ 0.001 No Par Value Shares: 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------- Total Authorized Capital: $ 200,000.00
-------------------- All post are my opinion. Do your own DD. Who's clicking your buy/sell button!? Posts: 7800 | From: Virginia | Registered: May 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
I'm assuming you are talking about the 25 May date versus the 31 May date. 31 May must be a type-O or it was pre-filled and signed by Mr. Sulja and prepared by his laywers who ended up getting it in one day before the 31 May deadline set by??? whoever. The ONLY thing (AFAIK) the 4th page does is say that Nevada sees SLJB in good standing. The fourth page has little to do with claims made on the previous pages which are for the state of Michigan.
The 200M vs 725M shares thing is still a big ??? Apparently some folks have already sent complaints to the state of Michigan regarding the inconsistent numbers. I'm thinking of doing the same if I don't get some info from the company about these confusing share structure issues.
Posts: 67 | Registered: Dec 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
Searched for: SULJA BROS. BUILDING SUPPLIES, LTD. ID Num: 60069W Entity Name: SULJA BROS. BUILDING SUPPLIES, LTD. Type of Entity: Foreign Profit Corporation Resident Agent: STEVEN SULJA Registered Office Address: 2251 DIX HWY STE 200 LINCOLN PARK MI 48146 Mailing Address: MI Formed Under Act Number(s):
Incorporation/Qualification Date: 5-30-2007
Jurisdiction of Origin: NEVADA
Number of Shares: 200,000,000
Year of Most Recent Annual Report:
Year of Most Recent Annual Report With Officers & Directors: Status: ACTIVE Date: Present
-------------------- All post are my opinion. Do your own DD. Who's clicking your buy/sell button!? Posts: 7800 | From: Virginia | Registered: May 2006
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Grande25: I'm assuming you are talking about the 25 May date versus the 31 May date. 31 May must be a type-O or it was pre-filled and signed by Mr. Sulja and prepared by his laywers who ended up getting it in one day before the 31 May deadline set by??? whoever. The ONLY thing (AFAIK) the 4th page does is say that Nevada sees SLJB in good standing. The fourth page has little to do with claims made on the previous pages which are for the state of Michigan.
The 200M vs 725M shares thing is still a big ??? Apparently some folks have already sent complaints to the state of Michigan regarding the inconsistent numbers. I'm thinking of doing the same if I don't get some info from the company about these confusing share structure issues.
It wasn't a typo imo. The Nevada Sec of State certified that Sulja exists as a corp since April 19, of 2005 and signed the doc on 25 May 2007. The Michigan Bureau of Comm Serv. sealed it on the 30th. Sulja signed it on the 31st of May ~~ I would think sulja would be one of the first to sign. And it has the Michigan address instead of the Canadian address. So what am I missing? Add to that the fax date time stamp of 30 May 2007 at 12:22pm (missing fax page 1 and 4 btw). I guess - just like the 200mm shares were the initial shares such as is the initial address which is why it still says michigan. So Nevada and Michigan can both agree that back in 2005 Sulja existed as a corp and somehow still exists. And also still 725mm shares. Was this just a qualification / update that they are still in existance? That would make sense to me. And adding the "Type of Entity: Foreign Profit Corporation" (if this is different). Whoopdedoo. now what?
-------------------- All post are my opinion. Do your own DD. Who's clicking your buy/sell button!? Posts: 7800 | From: Virginia | Registered: May 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
Just got off the phone with Aaron at the TA: A/S remains the same 725M and O/S remains at 594,357,801
Posts: 67 | Registered: Dec 2006
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Grande25: This stock is a POS run far away IMO
To Da MOOOOON!!!
-------------------- All post are my opinion. Do your own DD. Who's clicking your buy/sell button!? Posts: 7800 | From: Virginia | Registered: May 2006
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Grande25: This stock is a POS run far away IMO
To Da MOOOOON!!!
Hey..........
If you squint and stare into the sun and see a figure walking towards you......
The curves need to be in the right places
-------------------- All post are my opinion. Do your own DD. Who's clicking your buy/sell button!? Posts: 7800 | From: Virginia | Registered: May 2006
| IP: Logged |
-------------------- All post are my opinion. Do your own DD. Who's clicking your buy/sell button!? Posts: 7800 | From: Virginia | Registered: May 2006
| IP: Logged |
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
Printer-friendly view of this topic
![[Eek!]](eek.gif)
![[Razz]](tongue.gif)
![[Big Grin]](biggrin.gif)
![[Frown]](frown.gif)
![[Wink]](wink.gif)
![[Mad]](mad.gif)
