quote:Originally posted by eddy: 6 million plus this 2.5 million- http://www.sys-con.com/read/250744.htm plus a couple million when we close Skiershop, highangle,Northeast magazine,Lisker,Stockli, who knows what else Dan has up his sleave-
Eddy, the only thing up Dan's sleave is his mickie bottle.
Posts: 1637 | Registered: Apr 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
Posted by: themountnman In reply to: None Date:12/5/2006 1:31:24 AM Post #of 35769
Hello to you RJ,
And congratulations.
May the blessed union be a blissful and enduring one.
And yep. Still present and accounted for. Still invested as previously. No change(s). This one's real after all. Right? Good things to come. Market level and all. ROE. ROI.
And hello additionally to Alien and Patty and Klusser and Illum and Tony and Greg and Gorb and CHICPICK, et al (chronological order). Hope all are well and feeling fine. And as for yours truly? Returned a few days back from a well-deserved extended vacation. A little backcountry outing, as is my wont. And fun it was. An adventure to remember. Digital camera and all. And I had with me the means to power same via the solar route. I went prepared and as a result all was as hoped for. Fun indeed and highly rewarding in a number of ways. And as for all the e-mails and posts sent my way/directed to my attention in my absence? Well, all I can do is apologize to the relevant all for the lack of time available to me to respond to each and every of same individually and try to make amends via this post, and some fitting generalizations and general discussion otherwise, that hopefully will serve until I'm able to post again and get back, as before, to things on the e-mail front.
And so...
INXR:
And I'll be eleven for eleven when its time does come and its time is coming. Folks were advised to keep an eye on it. To act on the right entry point(s). And nothing has changed in the interim. I never provide a heads up that I'm not at least 90% convinced will see decent to serious green in relatively short order. A company, like SMMW, moving forward in more ways than one is INXR. And the price of admission is certainly right. And there I'll leave it but for a DD opp...
And build a very real company the right way, as always. And the PR's, etc. that arrived on the scene in my absence? Well, uplifting for sure. And the current focus? The market level one? What Dan has fervently made mention of numerous times of late and earlier? Well, still in place very seemingly with now, and once again, the enlisting of the assistance of TheSUBWAY folks. And of course every little bit helps, for as always, it's the audience that counts. That all-important one we so often reference. And increasing the par value of the company's common stock? To .001? Bodes well and then some, for same equates to no more stock issuances below that price. And good on that one for sure. Saying all it needs to about company true value/valuation and where the stock is eventually headed. And the appointment of Mr. Veve as Vice President of Sales and Marketing for us? Well, excellent for sure. We advertised after all for sales and marketing personnel, as we all well know, and we retained the services of one of the best in the end. And for sure and for certain it's sales and marketing where the money is for us overall. Media, telecom-to-be, retail - and - wholesale. The full gamut. And speaking of? Well, N'East magazine continues on its roll to making something of itself. Moving forward as always since being acquired by us. Jim hard at work as always with no more complaining. And good again. And the temporary suspension of our right side cable broadcast operations? Well, good also. For those ongoing negotiations that were mentioned via Q&A a while back can now take a worthwhile turn for the better. What Justin long ago mentioned about line lease expense being excessive for us in the relevant geographical region from the relevant carrier (TWC) is now potentially open to serious improvement allowing for operating in the black for us as re our left-side operations. A lot of negotiating to come, of course, but we now have a clean slate to work with. The potential for new and - mutually - beneficial alliances/relationships as opposed to things all one-sided. For, that is, our right-side operations re all things media to equal the potential of our left-side such operations relative to company bottom line and so on. For an operating profit to be made, as overwhelming costs/expenses entirely negate associated revenues as often talked about. Revenues alone being not the answer and always so. And certainly things on the left-side are moving along nicely as Dan himself happily pointed out not so long ago. And so we’ll look forward to a successful outcome to the mentioned negotiations. To more indeed favorable terms overall for us re costs/expenses and such. And our latest acquisition LOI? Well, right off the bat, no mention of accretive to earnings. And conspicuous by its absence, for sure, but not necessarily meaningful, in and of itself, as we stand to potentially gain much on the assets front alone. Not to mention the relevant infrastructures and myriad relationships the target offers. So, no mention/suggestion of earnings of any kind nor to any degree. Just the potential annual revenues of $6m plus being presented for our collective consideration. And certainly the referenced closing timeline of 21 days (from PR date) is a major plus, as similar such was the case re our once acquisition LOI with Lisker, and closing same came to pass as anticipated and even sooner. And, so, definitely bodes well. The acquisition being closed in a timely manner, that is. And hopefully, this time, we get the - details - re a successful conclusion (if so). A PR('s), that is, telling of percentage ownership interest for us. Of wholly owned or majority owned otherwise and whether or not current management re our latest and greatest subsidiary-to-be remains in place post-closing and/or joins our parent company slate of directors. And certainly it wouldn't hurt for a few bottom line numbers details to come our way additionally. Providing us a little telling insight into the inner sanctum of said latest and greatest subsidiary-to-be. Profitable or no and so on. And otherwise? Well, we have in said potential acquisition all of horizontal - and - vertical growth/expansion for us, which is a major plus overall, as operational diversification is always for the best. And so let's hope for a successful, and timely indeed, outcome to our LOI. And should the deal involve stock? Will it? Well, we have as mentioned (see above) a floor of .001 now in place re any/all new M&A-based stock issuance(s). And as an example...
2b x .001 = $2m
And, so, max out the authorized stock? And if so? And the acceptance of stock priced at .001 or above? Well, as always, Einstein need not apply. As same says all it needs to about where the stock - is - headed and just why it is that Dan and the rest - are - as adamant as they are about getting us permanently out of the cellar in the ways they are. Personal financial sacrifices and all. Much is at stake after all. Much to be gained there is. And after a short respite it - does - strike as being obviously time to get serious once again about moving us indeed at market level. About absolutely getting us permanently out of the cellar. TheSUBWAY engagement and all. And as for the company website changes for the better? Well, I’m surprised Klusser and the rest of you didn’t notice sooner. And changes for the better for sure. And once again bodes well as management seeks to continue to draw the world’s attention to our budding nationwide and more media and telecom-to-be and retail and wholesale and more empire. And what else and otherwise?
Well, our DVD and dividend as examples. And all things on the abusive shorting and squeeze play front. All things NOBO/OBO. And the buyback front. The mentioned monies courtesy indeed of personal sacrifices. And new HQ. Those ongoing negotiations last we heard. And so on. I mean, obviously management is hard at work getting the job done as always but we as shareholders are once again owed a duty to be kept up to date and informed at all times. And, so, how are things progressing re ascension from pinkland for example? When - will - our audit make its entrance? For without same we remain pink with no alternative to the plus side. And, so on, as stated. Lots of pluses/positives for sure, as discussed, but also a great many unanswered questions. Much shareholder unrest/discontent. And, so, despite the obviousness of management being as always hard at work, and in light of indeed mandated duties owed shareholders collectively, said hard-working management need to provide us one of those long ago assured routine, regular shareholder updates that I spoke of not so long ago. Not a fleeting webcast nor deficient Q&A session or other such, but a PR'd in-depth shareholder update pointing out all the current and future realities. Easing collective shareholder concern courtesy of a little filling in of the blanks. Courtesy of a little follow-up to earlier PR's and such. Shareholders, after all, aren't expecting miracles as they know better for the far greater part. All that's being requested is an update. A little something indeed assured us long ago - would - come our way routinely and regularly. A little dutiful communication, as stated. A little informing re how we’re faring re all the mentioned again intent to date. The mentioned PR’s and such. With new HQ inclusive. Summus centre number one. That ad-exchange deal and all. For new HQ is an again huge consideration for us. We need that first chunk of real estate and we need it direly. And - do - we have the referenced buyback funds? In place and ready to be applied in concert with TheSUBWAY push? And our audit almost complete, is it? Or is the intent now two years of financial data? Fiscal ‘05 and ‘06? Well. let us know. Update us indeed. Fill in the blanks indeed. And the abusive shorting issue again? The squeeze play? Our DVD? The dividend as mentioned/queried? And so on. And TheSUBWAY deal? Time to light a fire under market level for more reason than one? And - is - the company behind said deal? Or are we talking a third party(ies)? And - if - the company? Well, again, inform us. Inform us and spread the word as called for. And, so, let’s in concert with the mentioned many pluses/positives have an all-encompassing update presented via PR(’s) for the perusing pleasure of all. A little filling in of the blanks indeed. For if it is, as - would - again seem to be the case, time to move the stock in the ways desired by all then do provide all the impetus needed. Do paint a picture and do get our ever-ready, ever-watchful, massive and anxious audience primed as needed. That again all-important one. The one that Gorb for one routinely reminds us all of in various ways.
And certainly time it absolutely is in overall terms and from collective shareholder perspective to get the stock where it at the very least rightfully belongs. The effect(s) of relevant multiples inclusive. Time to absolutely bring Skiershop into the fold and to otherwise close all currently outstanding similar, and not so, deals. To move beyond VVV stage two. Time absolutely for an all-encompassing shareholder update. Getting us significantly and permanently out of the gutter and doing it right. The QBID II kind of right but with justifiable sustaining of lofty trading highs. And if we do successfully close our latest acquisition LOI? Our latest and indeed greatest? Well, a stubborn one-sided quote circumstance fit the overall proceedings, will it? Gross undervaluation ever deepening? So on? Well, not hardly. Time for a little reality check is what it is. And particularly following an indeed successful outcome to our referenced telecom pursuit. Time to get the stock to the mentioned .0003 to .0005 threshold and to go from there with no looking back as earlier talked about. Time for the successful sequel to famous Friday. The timing after all is as right as it could be as we close out fiscal ‘06 and ready ourselves to become a fully reporting company of obvious worth.
And we'll talk about/discuss more soon. After I’ve completed all the catching-up facing me courtesy of my extended outing. And again, hopefully all are well and feeling fine. And so...
SMMW = good things to come absolutely = money in the bank absolutely. ROE. ROI.
And a shareholder update, hopefully, we will be on the receiving end of and soon. A setting of the stage in the best way possible as talked about. The blanks necessarily filled in.
And regards of course to both yourself and your new (ahem) better half. And to all others additionally of course.
Description: Optical carrier (multiple strands of fiber) connected by equipment capable of speeds up to 2.488 Mbps.
Application: Large enterprise or ISP backbone.
Pros: Extremely high speed and throughput.
Cons: Extremely high cost.
Costs: Expect cost of an OC48 to start at around $3-500,000 for a stable, reliable system (e.g. from a Tier 1 provider)..... plus several hundred thousand dollars in setup costs. However....the pricing for these connections can vary widely depending on the carrier, location of service and the application for which the connection is being used. A Tier 1 provider should always be the provider of choice for any business serious about the quality of their OCx network.
Michael is the owner of FreedomFire Communications....including DS3-Bandwidth.com and Business-VoIP-Solution.com. Michael also authors Broadband Nation where you're always welcome to drop in and catch up on the latest BroadBand news, tips, insights, and ramblings for the masses
Posts: 3056 | Registered: Feb 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
Posted by: themountnman In reply to: None Date:12/5/2006 7:58:42 PM Post #of 35827
Thank-you to all for the welcoming comments and the otherwise.
And thank - you - RJ. And you’re welcome. And hopefully your own extended vacation dreams - will - come to fruition soon. And doubtless they will. And on the pps expectations front? Well, it’s open-ended for me. Since, that is, I have a very clear understanding of the true nature of the relevant underlying venues. That it is all about the audience and sparks and catalysts and so on. And certainly management has presented a different perspective in general and overall to date with Dan’s ... “That’s our plan.” ... pronouncement. The expectation, that is, that with increasing company true (present and future) value/valuation so will go the stock. That with the closing of pending and future M&A and such deals we’ll see market level advancing accordingly. And what else and to the contrary? Well, we have famous Friday when Dan and crew boldly stepped away from their collective ... “That’s our plan.” ... focus and made instead a valiant effort to move us at market level in ways more in line with the true nature of just how the underlying venues again - do - actually work for the far greater part. With, as we know, Dan himself afterwards expressing great disappointment in the failure of said bold effort. The timing unfortunately being not quite right though it was close and extremely so. And was it all a justified, understandable effort? Well, let’s look at it this way...
If under current share structure circumstances we were, as of this writing, sitting stably at, say ... .0025 ... would there be a need of a buyback(s)? Of personal financial sacrifices? So on? So it is understandable that management would apply available relevant resources in an attempt to precipitate a run. To yield the long-desired and - needed - market level outcome. And where are we now? Back to the “plan”? Or setting the stage for famous Friday II? Well, we shall see. Although seemingly we - are - talking both. With our latest LOI - and - TheSUBWAY engagement [if company precipitated and not a third party(ies)].
And what - of - said LOI? Again?
Well, when first I read the PR my thoughts drifted to how the deal came to be. Who did the initiating and why and so on? For, if you recall, Nicholas of Stockli was, at the relevant time, all about advantaging SMMW’s myriad resources in effecting maximum market penetration for the company’s products. It was a mutually beneficial situation. And what - of - the pending MMI deal? And the same or similar? Or is the company up for sale for a reason(s) otherwise? And what - of - the operating status? Overall fundamentals? What there? And - will - we be talking wholly owned subsidiary if a successful outcome? And what the cost and how executed? So my thoughts on the subject were and are varied. And certainly it wouldn’t fit with stated external growth/expansion goals for us, to acquire, that is, a massively debt-ridden, negative cash flow(s) and such entity. But the lack of the usual ... ‘accretive to earnings’ ... mention did catch my attention as noted and does have me wondering but not, as mentioned, overly concerned for reasons stated i.e., asset base, infrastructures, relationships, subscriber bases, etc. And hopefully we - will - get the details upon successful execution (if again so) as also mentioned. And certainly if the company’s (MMI) fundamentals and overall operational status - is - all we could hope for and then some? Well, what more need be said? A huge and more than welcome overall shot-in-the-arm for us for sure.
And so we wait. Find out - hopefully - the true reasoning behind the diversification. Cost-effective opportunity or something more deliberate? Something having to do with general mutual benefit as talked about? Or more specifically about building upon/leveraging what MMI has to offer relative to our media division and ongoing growth/expansion there? All of the above? And so on. And with that said? Well, a telling note from the latest Q&A session...
“What is the status of the $2.5 LOI, that you announced?”
“$2.5 M. discussions still on the table, pending due diligence and provision of completed financials from target company. We will PR any updates on this and other pending M&A activities”
And DD and financials. With the gist being that re ongoing M&A activity we - are - very seemingly sticking with those aforementioned stated external growth/expansion goals of ours of strong positive cash flow(s) and other evidence of fundamental and operational soundness re any and all relevant target(s).
And close the deal in short order? Provide us the details? Fill in a few blanks? Tell us about the buyback funds and how close we are to securing Summus center number one and the status of our LOI with REN/Steamboat TV-17, etc?
A few blanks filled in indeed. We hope.
And, so, interesting days ahead.
And we - shall - see.
And you and the rest take care and have a good one.
posted
Sent By: MLR_Lite Date: 12/8/2006 1:07:20 PM
OK, just talked to Alex again. Nice fellow. Just wish I was smart enough to ask him some tough questions.
They have had their OC48 network up for about 2 years. It has plenty of bandwidth for television. As a matter of fact, they do currently broadcast a television station. Probably that one on their website PAM TV.
He said they were still discussing people's roles for when they join SMMW.
Posts: 3056 | Registered: Feb 2005
| IP: Logged |
jmho---Dan needs to step down and let someone else take over the company. jmho--Dan is in over his head as CEO-----COMPANY NEWS AND PRESS RELEASES FROM OTHER SOURCES:
Summus Works: Company Announces Cancellation of LOI to Acquire Matrix Management, Inc.
Denver, CO., Jan 02, 2007 (M2 PRESSWIRE via COMTEX) -- Summus Works, Inc. (Pink Sheets: SMMW) announced that having exceeded the due diligence and initial negotiations period pertinent to its letter of intent to acquire Matrix Management, Inc., the parties have been unable to satisfy both the immediate goals of Matrix Management and Summus management. Summus Works, Inc. (Pink Sheets: SMMW) is a multi-media holding company with interests in outdoor sports, retail, e-tail, print, web, television and film. For more information on the company or its outdoor sports and media subsidiaries, visit www.summusworks.com.
This release includes forward-looking statements made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 that involve risks and uncertainties including, but not limited to, the impact of competitive products, the ability to meet customer demand, the ability to manage growth, acquisitions of technology, equipment, or human resources, the effect of economic and business conditions, and the ability to attract and retain skilled personnel. The Company is not obligated to revise or update any forward-looking statements in order to reflect events or circumstances that may arise after the date of this release.
CONTACT: Stuart T. Smith, SmallCapVoice.com Tel: +1 512 267 2430 e-mail: Info*Smallcapvoice.com Dan Burgess, Summus Works, Inc. Tel: +1 888 607 9495 e-mail: summus*summusworks.com
M2 Communications Ltd disclaims all liability for information provided within M2 PressWIRE. Data supplied by named party/parties. Further information on M2 PressWIRE can be obtained at http://www.presswire.net on the world wide web. Inquiries to info*m2.com.
(C)1994-2007 M2 COMMUNICATIONS LTD
-0-
Search for Dun & Bradstreet reports on this company.
Posts: 3056 | Registered: Feb 2005
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by eddy: Dan is gone to Colorado and Utah FWIW
Heres Why, looks like Dan has derailed the SMMW Train and a wreck is ahead....more bad news....
Summus Works: Company Divests Stockli Ski, U.S.A. Interest
Denver, CO., Jan 03, 2007 (M2 PRESSWIRE via COMTEX News Network) -- Summus Works, Inc. (Pink Sheets: SMMW) announced the Company has divested its interest of Stockli Ski, U.S.A. under favorable terms releasing the Company from remaining obligations under its agreement(s) with Stockli Ski, U.S.A.
Summus Works, Inc. (Pink Sheets: SMMW) is a multi-media holding company with interests in outdoor sports, retail, e-tail, print, web, television and film. For more information on the company or its outdoor sports and media subsidiaries, visit www.summusworks.com.
This release includes forward-looking statements made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 that involve risks and uncertainties including, but not limited to, the impact of competitive products, the ability to meet customer demand, the ability to manage growth, acquisitions of technology, equipment, or human resources, the effect of economic and business conditions, and the ability to attract and retain skilled personnel. The Company is not obligated to revise or update any forward-looking statements in order to reflect events or circumstances that may arise after the date of this release.
we are back to square one after 29 months and billions dumped-lol-
Well, the shareholders may be back to square one, but old Danny-Boy and his crew have in reality moved from Vermont to Colorado. If you are a skier, you know how awesome a move like that would be. Especially for free. These guy's do ski? Don't they?
Go easy on the "shine" eddy Posts: 25 | Registered: Aug 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
Historical Time & Sales Stock Symbol Trade Date Price Range Trade Size Trades per Page Today 1 day ago 2 days ago 3 days ago 4 days ago Min Max Min Max (Max 400)
posted
what if??? Dan was getting rid of a lot of SMMW holdings to pay cash for Matrix? or another big revenue company? thoughts?
Posts: 3056 | Registered: Feb 2005
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by eddy: what if??? Dan was getting rid of a lot of SMMW holdings to pay cash for Matrix? or another big revenue company? thoughts?
Sorry, IMO Summus isn't getting any money for dropping Stokli. They were just a distributer. Exclusive rights to distribute a product. IMO, Summus paid for that right to make a commision on sales, I don't think there is any investment that they will get back.
IMO, if Dan did/does get anything in return for 51% of NEast, it was/will be some kind of PDVP stock deal. I don't think Jim has any significant money lying around to give to Dan. I still think the chances are high that Dan still owed Jim and couldn't forfill Summus' commitment and the Mag will be gone by default.
Believe me Eddy, I do understand why you try and spin these recent events into a positive, but my gut says Summus will be either doing the big r/s soon, if not total B/K.
Hope you enjoyed my thoughts Posts: 25 | Registered: Aug 2006
| IP: Logged |
DAN WAS THE MAN. DAN HAD A PLAN. TILL ONE DAY DAN SAW A MAN THAT TOOK HIM BY THE HAND. HE TOLD HIM BE GREEDY FOR THE SHAREHOLDERS ARE FUN, DUMPING TONS OF SUMMUS SHARES IS PROFITABLE AND VERY FUN. DAN SAID WHO ARE YOU SIR, THE MAN THEN REPLIED, I AM MR ASSTROM, I SHOW YOU WHAT TO DO, FOR IF YOU FOLLOW MY DUMPING PLAN YOU'LL BE THE MAN, DAN TURNED AND SAID WHAT IF I GET CAUGHT, THE ASSTROM THEN REPLIED YOU SHOW THEM A LITTLE UPSIDE. ONCE THEY STOP CRYING, AND THE BID GOES AWAY, KEEP GORBEC SINGING WHILE YOU KEEP SKIING. HE WILL WORK FOR PEANUTS, WHILE YOU DUMP THE STOCK, CRAP ALL THE SHAREHOLDERS AS THEY DESERVE TO ROT.
tHEN DAN SAID I WANT TO BE YOUR SON, ASSTROM SAID CONGRATS, BUT THE FUN HAS JUST BEGUN!
PUT OUT LOI'S THAT STACK UP TO THE SKY., CLOSE ON ONE OR TWO OF THEM AND YOU'LL BE JUST FINE. SHAREHOLDERS MAKE YOU MONEY, WHILE THEY SIT AND CRY, HAVE A MEMBER OF YOUR BOARD POSTING TO KEEP IT FUN.
Posts: 3056 | Registered: Feb 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
more bad news-lol-just thougt we were getting good news------------------------------ IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
MAL DUSZAK, ) JURY TRIAL DEMANDED ) Plaintiff, ) 07cv0009 ) v. ) ) EDWARD ABRAHAM ROSENMAN, ) WAKISHA ROSENMAN a/k/a WAKISHA ) NICOLAS, FIRST GUARDIAN ) FINANCIAL CORPORATION, ) TRAFALGAR LEASING & FINANCE ) CORPORATION, COSMOS GROUP, ) WINDSOR CAPITAL LTD., FAUZIE ) MOHAMED a/k/a FAUZIE MOHAMAED, ) “JOHN” LNU, JOHN DOES 1-100, ) ) Defendants. )
MOTION TO SUBSTITUTE “JOHN DOE” PARTY AND TO AMEND CAPTION
AND NOW, Plaintiff Mal Duszak (“Duszak”), and moves this Court to substitute John Doe I with Daniel W. Burgess: 1. Duszak filed an extensive complaint against several entities and persons in connection with a complicated stock fraud scheme involving a company known as First Guarding Financial Corporation, which is traded on the Pink Sheets over the counter stock market. The stock fraud involved issuing press releases claiming that the company was reducing its authorized shares, all while at the same time, it was issuing new shares in excess of those authorized by its articles of incorporation. 2. The Complaint names John Does 1 through 100 because at the time of the filing, the identities of those responsible were not known. 3. Specifically, the John Doe defendants used nominees and name alterations during the course of their scheme. For instance, they used a 29 year old restaurant worker for their corporate “President” who was allegedly participating in multi-million dollar business transactions – all while managing a restaurant in Florida. 4. An extensive investigation has been started by the Plaintiff. 5. The Plaintiff learned that one press release announced a business transaction where FGFC purchased a company, “nationwidereforsale,” which allegedly had over $600,000,000 in real estate listings. An investigation revealed that an individual named Daniel W. Burgess purchased the website www.nationwidereforsale.com at an e-Bay auction for $1,300. Mr. Burgess admitted to the seller that he was buying the domain name for FGFC. Mr. Burgess provided the seller of the domain with contact emails dan*highanglemedia.com and dan*skiershop.com . 6. An investigation into these emails verifies that they indeed belong to Daniel Burgess who is the President of another publicly traded company, Summus Works, Inc., (Pink Sheets: SMMW). Mr. Burgess has apparently issued billions of shares (based on information, Mr. Burgess issued over 80,000,000,000 shares) in connection with SMMW that has reduced the price of the stock to $.0001, the lowest possible price for a publicly traded stock unless the buyer or seller is a licensed broker acting as a market maker. 7. Repeated attempts to contact Mr. Burgess have been unsuccessful and he has not returned various telephone calls. 8. The information in connection with the nationwidereforsale.com transaction, and Mr. Burgess’ prior participation in over the counter stocks, provides probable cause to believe that he may be directing FGFC’s activities through the use of nominees such as Defendant Rosenman. 9. At a minimum, the information reveals that Mr. Burgess has participated or aided and abetted the FGFC matter to a point where he should be substituted for John Doe 1 in this case. 10. As such, Plaintiff requests an Order directing that John Doe 1 be replaced with Daniel Burgess and that the caption be amended accordingly. 11. A proposed summons is attached for Daniel Burgess. 11. A proposed Order is attached. WHEREFORE, based on the above, plaintiff Mal Duszak respectfully requests that this Court issue an appropriate Order. I, Mal Duszak, declare and state under the penalty for perjury that the allegations above are true and correct to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief. 28 USC §1746. Respectfully submitted,
____________________________________ Mal Duszak
Posts: 3056 | Registered: Feb 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
Scottrade has ceased trading this and shows no market value for stock. I was wondering where it went. I only had a few C notes wrapped up in this. Beer, gas, and blow money for the coming week. Sounds like another SLJB. What else is new in pinkie land.
Posts: 669 | From: Gouldsboro, Pa. | Registered: May 2006
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by beechwood: Scottrade has ceased trading this and shows no market value for stock. I was wondering where it went. I only had a few C notes wrapped up in this. Beer, gas, and blow money for the coming week. Sounds like another SLJB. What else is new in pinkie land.
yes, really is bad
Posts: 3056 | Registered: Feb 2005
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by eddy: more bad news-lol-just thougt we were getting good news------------------------------ IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
MAL DUSZAK, ) JURY TRIAL DEMANDED ) Plaintiff, ) 07cv0009 ) v. ) ) EDWARD ABRAHAM ROSENMAN, ) WAKISHA ROSENMAN a/k/a WAKISHA ) NICOLAS, FIRST GUARDIAN ) FINANCIAL CORPORATION, ) TRAFALGAR LEASING & FINANCE ) CORPORATION, COSMOS GROUP, ) WINDSOR CAPITAL LTD., FAUZIE ) MOHAMED a/k/a FAUZIE MOHAMAED, ) “JOHN” LNU, JOHN DOES 1-100, ) ) Defendants. )
MOTION TO SUBSTITUTE “JOHN DOE” PARTY AND TO AMEND CAPTION
AND NOW, Plaintiff Mal Duszak (“Duszak”), and moves this Court to substitute John Doe I with Daniel W. Burgess: 1. Duszak filed an extensive complaint against several entities and persons in connection with a complicated stock fraud scheme involving a company known as First Guarding Financial Corporation, which is traded on the Pink Sheets over the counter stock market. The stock fraud involved issuing press releases claiming that the company was reducing its authorized shares, all while at the same time, it was issuing new shares in excess of those authorized by its articles of incorporation. 2. The Complaint names John Does 1 through 100 because at the time of the filing, the identities of those responsible were not known. 3. Specifically, the John Doe defendants used nominees and name alterations during the course of their scheme. For instance, they used a 29 year old restaurant worker for their corporate “President” who was allegedly participating in multi-million dollar business transactions – all while managing a restaurant in Florida. 4. An extensive investigation has been started by the Plaintiff. 5. The Plaintiff learned that one press release announced a business transaction where FGFC purchased a company, “nationwidereforsale,” which allegedly had over $600,000,000 in real estate listings. An investigation revealed that an individual named Daniel W. Burgess purchased the website www.nationwidereforsale.com at an e-Bay auction for $1,300. Mr. Burgess admitted to the seller that he was buying the domain name for FGFC. Mr. Burgess provided the seller of the domain with contact emails dan*highanglemedia.com and dan*skiershop.com . 6. An investigation into these emails verifies that they indeed belong to Daniel Burgess who is the President of another publicly traded company, Summus Works, Inc., (Pink Sheets: SMMW). Mr. Burgess has apparently issued billions of shares (based on information, Mr. Burgess issued over 80,000,000,000 shares) in connection with SMMW that has reduced the price of the stock to $.0001, the lowest possible price for a publicly traded stock unless the buyer or seller is a licensed broker acting as a market maker. 7. Repeated attempts to contact Mr. Burgess have been unsuccessful and he has not returned various telephone calls. 8. The information in connection with the nationwidereforsale.com transaction, and Mr. Burgess’ prior participation in over the counter stocks, provides probable cause to believe that he may be directing FGFC’s activities through the use of nominees such as Defendant Rosenman. 9. At a minimum, the information reveals that Mr. Burgess has participated or aided and abetted the FGFC matter to a point where he should be substituted for John Doe 1 in this case. 10. As such, Plaintiff requests an Order directing that John Doe 1 be replaced with Daniel Burgess and that the caption be amended accordingly. 11. A proposed summons is attached for Daniel Burgess. 11. A proposed Order is attached. WHEREFORE, based on the above, plaintiff Mal Duszak respectfully requests that this Court issue an appropriate Order. I, Mal Duszak, declare and state under the penalty for perjury that the allegations above are true and correct to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief. 28 USC §1746. Respectfully submitted,
____________________________________ Mal Duszak
Nice DD EDDY!!! I lost about $400.00 on this POS. I am just glad that I got out of FGFC without taking a huge loss. I don't think that anyone on the FGFC thread realizes yet that Dan was really running the show.
500 into 100K...You Gotta' Believe!!!
Posts: 231 | From: Ohio | Registered: Mar 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
Eddy, where did you find that? Can you provide the link? I can't even find a rumor of this anywhere from a google search....
-------------------- "Sometimes I lie awake at night, and ask, 'Where have I gone wrong?' Then a voice says to me, 'This is going to take more than one night.'" - Charlie Brown (Charles Shultz) Posts: 719 | From: Leesburg, VA | Registered: Jul 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
lol-lol--: clockwatcher10 16 Jan 2007, 10:59 PM EST Msg. 17164 of 17167 Jump to msg. # Another new court case:
Current Case Docket Information Court record: 31442 Superior Court County of Lamoille _______________________________________________________________________________ | | | Docket No. 4-1-07 Lecv Fischer Skis US, LLC vs. Skiershop Mount| |______________________________________________________________________________| Case Type: Last judge: None Case Track: Not set Recused: None Case Status: Active - Answer Due Court/Jury: Court trial Next Hearing: ================================================================================ PARTIES No. Role Litigant Name Attorney Name Telephone -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- p# 1 plf Fischer Skis US, LLC Steckel, Susan J. 563-4400 p# 2 def Skiershop Mountain Sports, LLCSimon, Brice C. 253-7810 p# 3 def Burgess, Daniel Simon, Brice C. 253-7810 p# 4 def Roehm, Barbara Simon, Brice C. 253-7810 =============================================================================== DISPUTES DsptCase Name Disputants Dispo Date -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 Breach of Contract - Business p#1 v p#2 2 Breach of Contract - Business p#1 v p#3 3 Breach of Contract - Business p#1 v p#4 ================================================================================ MOTIONS/PETITIONS/REQUESTS FOR RELIEF No. Type Status Judge Date ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ================================================================================ 12/22/06 929789 - couappr Appearance entered by Brice C. Simon on behalf of Defendant Skiershop Mountain Sports, LLC and Defendant Daniel Burgess and Defendant Barbara Roehm. 929790 - document 1 document filed by Attorney Brice C. Simon for parties 2-4: Certificate of Service.
01/05/07 929755 - partyadd Fischer Skis US, LLC, Plaintiff. 929756 - couappr Appearance entered by Susan J. Steckel on behalf of Plaintiff Fischer Skis US, LLC. 929757 - partyadd Skiershop Mountain Sports, LLC, Defendant. 929758 - partyadd Daniel Burgess, Defendant. 929759 - partyadd Barbara Roehm, Defendant. 929760 - cvfile - status set to asd Breach of Contract - Business case filed by Plaintiff Fischer Skis US, LLC against Defendant Skiershop Mountain Sports, LLC and Defendant Daniel Burgess and Defendant Barbara Roehm. 929761 - document 3 documents filed by Attorney Susan J. Steckel for party 1: SIGNED Summons: Skiershop 12/15/06; SIGNED Summons: D.Burgess 12/15/06; SIGNED Summons: R.Roehm 12/19/06. Service complete on party(s) 2: personal service. Documents served: S&C; Exhibit(s). Service complete on party(s) 3: personal service. Documents served: S&C; Exhibit(s). Service complete on party(s) 4: personal service. Documents served: S&C; Exhibit(s). 929785 - cstat - status set to aad Case status changed.
01/10/07 929791 - letsent Letter Advising of Docket Number Assig. letter sent to Plaintiff Fischer Skis US, LLC and Defendant Skiershop Mountain Sports, LLC and Defendant Daniel Burgess and Defendant Barbara Roehm. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ cuments filed by Attorney Susan J. Steckel for party 1: SIGNED Summons: Skiershop 12/15/06; SIGNED Summons: D.Burgess 12/15/06; SIGNED Summons: R.Roehm 12/19/06. Service complete on party(s) 2: personal service. Documents served: S&C; Exhibit(s). Service complete on party(s) 3: personal service. Documents served: S&C; Exhibit(s). Service complete on party(s) 4: personal service. Documents served: S&C; Exhibit(s). 929785 - cstat - status set to aad Case status changed.
01/10/07 929791 - letsent Letter Advising of Docket Number Assig. letter sent to Plaintiff Fischer Skis US, LLC and Defendant Ski
Posts: 3056 | Registered: Feb 2005
| IP: Logged |
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
Printer-friendly view of this topic
![[Razz]](tongue.gif)
Eddy, the only thing up Dan's sleave is his mickie bottle.
![[Eek!]](eek.gif)
![[Smile]](smile.gif)
