SMMW has been sitting at the bottom for quite a while now. They ordered the NOBO on Oct. 13. Should be hearing something soon from it. They have had a couple of PRs, but no movement, little volume. I bet some of you out there still hold this one.
Summus Works, Inc. Investor Questions Answered at SmallCapVoice.com
AUSTIN, TX -- (MARKET WIRE) -- October 30, 2006 -- SmallCapVoice.com (SCV) today announced that answers have been posted to the questions submitted to SCV by the Summus Works (PINKSHEETS: SMMW) shareholders. You may view the Q&A report at http://www.smallcapvoice.com/smmw/q-a-3.html.
Shareholders and interested parties are also encouraged to send in additional questions for future posting and/or audio interviews with Stuart Smith and Summus Works President Dan Burgess. All inquiries and comments should be sent to info*smallcapvoice.com.
Summus Works, Inc. (PINKSHEETS: SMMW) is a multi-media holding company with interests in outdoor sports, retail, e-tail, print, web, television and film. For more information on the company or its outdoor sports and media subsidiaries, visit www.summusworks.com.
This release includes forward-looking statements made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 that involve risks and uncertainties including, but not limited to, the impact of competitive products, the ability to meet customer demand, the ability to manage growth, acquisitions of technology, equipment, or human resources, the effect of economic and business conditions, and the ability to attract and retain skilled personnel. The Company is not obligated to revise or update any forward-looking statements in order to reflect events or circumstances that may arise after the date of this release.
CONTACT: Investor Relations Stuart T. Smith SmallCapVoice.com 512-267-2430 E-mail: Email Contact www.summusworks.com
SOURCE: Summus Works, Inc.
Posted by Sally77 on :
Here are the actual questions and answers:
From the PR:
Who won the contest on the name change game? An objecting beneficial owner who expressed disinterest in being publicized.
When should we expect to see an update on your current buyback? The buyback continues as planned, and any increases will be released publicly.
What is the status of the DVD that is going to be shipped to shareholders? When should we EXPECT them to be IN HAND to the shareholders? DVD ships this week (10/30). “In hand” date will depend on individual addresses.
When will the divvy be distributed? Also what are the restrictions on it? Dividend pay date is November 20, 2006. Shareholders receive the restricted 144 shares owned by the Company, pro rata.
What is the status of the $2.5 LOI, that you announced? $2.5 M. discussions still on the table, pending due diligence and provision of completed financials from target company. We will PR any updates on this and other pending M&A activities.
When will the SkierShop LOI close? Skiershop LOI still active and pending. At this time, choosing a closing date would be premature.
Update us on the Audit? The audit is a work in progress and we apologize about the delay.
Update please on the NOBO list? New NOBO information that will be publicly released (not including any personal information) will be that current as of the upcoming dividend record date.
How short are we now? We can only speculate as to the quantity of short sales.
What is ********** saying about the short? ********** opines that we may be significantly short.
Back in July 2006…HOW MUCH did the company buy of SMMW? The buyback continues as planned, and any increases will be released publicly. We released multiple PR’s regarding the retirement of shares.
What is the current Insider Ownership, back a few months ago it was 56% per an interview? Insider ownership is approximately 60%.
How much longer with SmallCapVoice be our IR Firm? Small Cap Voice has been retained for another six months.
With only FOUR MM on the ASK, when should we expect some kind of news to lower that number? Regarding news, we publicly announce every significant event via press releases, and we hope that shareholders appreciate this.
When should we expect a tender offer to be announced? A tender offer has been considered, and any decision regarding one will be released publicly.
What is the status of the Magic Snowman film? That was PR’ed back in 2004, with NO updates! Magic Snowman’s executive producer experienced delays securing the final budget for the film.
When do you see this o/s going DOWN to 60b as mentioned in the audio interview? It is our plan to reduce the I/O to below 60 B; we will announce publicly every cancellation.
When will the next audio interview be? You have gone quiet after the last few! We do not have a specific date for the next audio interview with Stuart.
Scott Trade not allowing buys only sells. We are looking into the issue with Scottrade. As soon as we learn something from them we will make our shareholders aware of it.
Posted by Sally77 on :
the ******* is "buy ins . net"
no spaces
Posted by FOSTR on :
held this for to long had to get out in sept at .0001 Im not sure a stick of dynamite would move this
Posted by beechwood on :
SMMW was a good clean shell when Dan bought it I and I believe it still is. SMMW IS GENERATING REVENUE! And that's a helluva lot more than you can say for most .0001's out there at present. According to www.buyins.n_t, the squeeze trigger price on SMMW was around .00016 for the MM's. My guess is they're holding it down to shake out the shorts as they have an aggressive plan in place against naked short selling. This is a good crew with some very good people behind the scenes. That makes it a lucrative target for a possible R/M if they can hook up with likely candidate. I bought 3 mil. shares of this at .0001 ($300) back in the spring of the year and still hold. I'm dreaming of the day it R/M and pulls an LFZA! C'mon Dan! - find a private outfit looking to R/M!...
Posted by The Phat Man on :
i'll be more than happy to get out of this biggest POS play ever at .0002 what an f'n joke... i buy in at .0001 and can't even sell to get out. even the idea of the squeeze trigger being at .00016 with not a single MM on the bid says this is the biggest pos out there. i don't care what happens, just get me out of this b!tch. this play is a stage-five clinger (a la 'wedding crashers')
Posted by FOSTR on :
quote:Originally posted by The Phat Man: i'll be more than happy to get out of this biggest POS play ever at .0002 what an f'n joke... i buy in at .0001 and can't even sell to get out. even the idea of the squeeze trigger being at .00016 with not a single MM on the bid says this is the biggest pos out there. i don't care what happens, just get me out of this b!tch. this play is a stage-five clinger (a la 'wedding crashers')
took me over 2 weeks to sell at .0001 just to get out
Posted by CashCowMoo on :
for those who think this is going to move i suggest looking at how many shares are floating around. i mean...buyback or not...anything in the high billions is dangerous. over 50 billion is just insane
Posted by eddy on :
anything new?
Posted by atleast on :
quote:Originally posted by eddy: anything new?
sold yesterday at .00002 (market price)
Posted by eddy on :
quote:Originally posted by atleast:
quote:Originally posted by eddy: anything new?
sold yesterday at .00002 (market price)
that sucks
Posted by eddy on :
wonder how much we owe?----------By: clockwatcher10 14 Nov 2006, 09:14 PM EST Msg. 15739 of 15762 Jump to msg. # Case closed between Dan and the State of Vermont. Dan lost. Whatever the amount due, Dan's gotta pay up.
Court record: 30270 Superior Court County of Lamoille Docket No. 133-6-06 Lecv Vermont Department of Taxes vs. Burgess Case Type: Last judge: Dennis R. Pearson Case Track: Not set Recused: None Case Status: Disposed Court/Jury: Court trial Next Hearing: ================================================================================ PARTIES No. Role Litigant Name Attorney Name Telephone -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- p# 1 plf Vermont Department of Taxes Collins, Timothy 828-3324 p# 2 def Burgess, Daniel =============================================================================== DISPUTES DsptCase Name Disputants Dispo Date -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 cmpl Collection:Pers.Income p#1 v p#2 default11/13/06 ================================================================================ MOTIONS/PETITIONS/REQUESTS FOR RELIEF No. Type Status Judge Date ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 M/for Enlargement of Time for Service granted DRP 08/22/06 2 M/for Enlargement of Time to Serve moot CLERK 10/02/06 3 M/for Entry of Default granted DRP 11/13/06 4 M/for Default Judgment granted DRP 11/13/06 ================================================================================ 06/29/06 885085 - partyadd Vermont Department of Taxes, Plaintiff. 885086 - couappr Appearance entered by Timothy Collins on behalf of Plaintiff Vermont Department of Taxes. 885087 - partyadd Daniel Burgess, Defendant. 885088 - cvfile - status set to asd Collection:Pers.Income case filed by Plaintiff Vermont Department of Taxes against Defendant Daniel Burgess.
07/05/06 885089 - letsent Letter Advising of Docket Number Assig. letter sent to Plaintiff Vermont Department of Taxes. 08/14/06 895517 - mprfile MPR 1) Motion for Enlargement of Time for Service filed by Plaintiff Vermont Department of Taxes. Motion for Enlargement of Time for Service given to judge.
08/22/06 896867 - mpreo Entry order re MPR 1) Motion for Enlargement of Time for Service. M/Reaction Form. granted by DRP. Compliance by
9/30/06.
896868 - letsent Enclosure of Order letter sent to Plaintiff Vermont Department of Taxes. 09/28/06 908521 - mprfile MPR 2) Motion for Enlargement of Time to Serve filed by Plaintiff Vermont Department of Taxes. Motion for Enlargement of Time to Serve given to judge.
10/02/06 907463 - document 2 documents filed by Attorney Timothy Collins for party 1: SIGNED Summons: 9/25/06; LCSD Invoice $58.87. Service complete on party(s) 2: personal service. Documents served: S&C. 908523 - mprstat MPR 2 status changed to moot.
10/19/06 915356 - mprfile MPR 3) Motion for Entry of Default filed by Plaintiff Vermont Department of Taxes. Motion for Entry of Default given to judge.Documents filed: Affid of Timothy Collins. 915357 - mprfile MPR 4) Motion for Default Judgment filed by Plaintiff Vermont Department of Taxes. Motion for Default Judgment given to judge.Documents filed: Affidavit of PHilip Goldwyn; 2nd Affid of PHilip Goldwyn; DoD Certificate; Prop JO.
11/13/06 916742 - mpreo Entry order re MPR's 3-4: 3) Motion for Entry of Default; 4) Motion for Default Judgment. M/Reaction Form. granted by DRP. 916744 - entorder Entry Order by Judge Dennis R. Pearson: JUDGMENT ENTERED FOR PLAINTIFF. 916745 - letsent Enclosure of Order letter sent to Plaintiff Vermont Department of Taxes. 916746 - cvdisp - status set to dis Dispute 1 disposed: Default Judgment. 916747 - close Case closed. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Vermont Department of Taxes. Motion for Default Judgment given to judge.Documents filed: Affidavit of PHilip Goldwyn; 2nd Affid of PHilip Goldwyn; DoD Certificate; Prop JO.
11/13/06 916742 - mpreo Entry order re MPR's 3-4: 3) Motion for Entry of Default; 4) Motion for Default Judgment. M/Reaction Form. granted by DRP. 916744 - entorder Entry Order by Judge Dennis R. Pearson: JUDGMENT ENTERED FOR PLAINTIFF. 916745 - letsent Enclosure of Order letter sent to Plaintiff Vermont Department of Taxes. 916746 - cvdisp - status set to dis Dispute 1 dispos - - - - -
Posted by eddy on :
my shares are for sale after 28 months holding through all the empty promises. hope volume comes back and lets me out at .0001-G/L all that are holding.
Posted by eddy on :
COMPANY NEWS AND PRESS RELEASES FROM OTHER SOURCES:
Summus Works: High Angle Media Announces 4th Annual Stowe Mountain Film Festival
STOWE, VT., Nov 16, 2006 (M2 PRESSWIRE via COMTEX) -- Summus Works, Inc. (Pink Sheets: SMMW) subsidiary High Angle Media announced the fourth annual Stowe Mountain Film Festival will commence November 25, 2006 with multiple weekly events running through the month of December. In association with the Vermont Ski Museum, the film festival celebrates the history, present and future of mountain sports and culture through the films that best capture their essence. In addition to the latest features from Matchstick Films, Meathead Films and Backcountry TV, the fourth annual festival will also feature awards for emerging film makers. Information on all events, film entries and sponsorship opportunities will soon be available at www.stowefilmfest.com.
Summus Works, Inc. (Pink Sheets: SMMW) is a multi-media holding company with interests in outdoor sports, retail, e-tail, print, web, television and film. For more information on the company or its outdoor sports and media subsidiaries, visit www.summusworks.com.
This release includes forward-looking statements made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 that involve risks and uncertainties including, but not limited to, the impact of competitive products, the ability to meet customer demand, the ability to manage growth, acquisitions of technology, equipment, or human resources, the effect of economic and business conditions, and the ability to attract and retain skilled personnel. The Company is not obligated to revise or update any forward-looking statements in order to reflect events or circumstances that may arise after the date of this release.
SOURCE: Summus Works, Inc.
M2 Communications Ltd disclaims all liability for information provided within M2 PressWIRE. Data supplied by named party/parties. Further information on M2 PressWIRE can be obtained at http://www.presswire.net on the world wide web. Inquiries to info*m2.com.
(C)1994-2006 M2 COMMUNICATIONS LTD
-0-
Search for Dun & Bradstreet reports on this company.
Posted by eddy on :
The CEO Who Cried Shorts!!
There once was a CEO who was bored as he sat on the hillside watching the stagnate PPS. To amuse himself he took a great breath and sang out, "Shorts Shorts! The Shorts are chasing the PPS. down!!
The shareholders came running up the hill to help the CEO drive the Shorts away. But when they arrived at the top of the hill, they found no Shorts. The CEO laughed at the sight of the shareholders angry faces.
"Don't cry 'Shorts', CEO," said the Shareholders, "when there's no Shorts!" They went grumbling back down the hill.
Later, the CEO sang out again, "Shorts, Shorts! The Shorts are chasing the PPS. down!" To his naughty delight, he watched the shareholders run up the hill to help him drive the shorts away.
When the shareholders saw no shorts they sternly said, "Save your frightened song for when there is really some shorting! Don't cry 'Shorts' when there is NO Shorts!"
But the CEO just grinned and watched them go grumbling down the hill once more.
Later, he saw a REAL Shorts, shorting his stock. Alarmed, he leaped to his feet and sang out as loudly as he could, "Shorts! Shorts!"
But the shareholders thought he was trying to fool them again, and so they didn't come.
At sunset, everyone wondered why the CEO hadn't returned to the village with their higher PPS. They went up the hill to find the CEO. They found him weeping.
"There really was really shorts here! The shareholders have scattered! I cried out, "Shorts!" Why didn't the shareholders believe me?"
An old CEO tried to comfort the younger CEO as they walked back to the village.
"We'll help you look for the angry shareholders in the morning," he said, putting his arm around the youth, "Nobody believes a liar...even when he is telling the truth!"
Posted by Bigrod40 on :
LOL ... wake us when there is a bid and I'll hit the snooze button waiting until this stock sniffs .0002.
Maybe they should retire 40 Billion shares. That MIGHT help.
Posted by eddy on :
if they close the loi-best news to date-jmho
Posted by easy_b on :
Summus Works, Inc. Announces Executed Letter of Intent to Acquire Salt Lake City-Based Telecommunications Company Matrix Management, Inc. Friday December 1, 6:30 am ET
Acquisition Expected to Add More Than $6 Million in Annual Revenue
SALT LAKE CITY, UT--(MARKET WIRE)--Dec 1, 2006 -- Summus Works, Inc. (Other OTC:SMMW.PK - News) announced it has executed a Letter of Intent to acquire the Salt Lake City-based telecommunications company Matrix Management, Inc., owner and operator of Network Management Incorporated (NMI) and Matrix Telecom. The acquisition will expand and diversify Summus' interests into the $2.7 trillion global telecommunications industry. The acquisition is expected to add more than $6 million in annual revenue. NMI is a full-service telecommunications company that specializes in retail and enterprise telecom products and services including domestic and international long distance services, voice over internet protocol (VOIP), pre-paid phone cards, pre-paid wireless, wholesale long distance, residential home services, point of sale activation (POSA), prepaid Visa debit cards, toll free numbers and switch leasing.
Matrix corporate headquarters is a high-tech 60,000 sq. ft. facility located in Salt Lake City, Utah with additional sales and network offices in Los Angeles, California and Miami, Florida. Matrix also manages an OC-48 network employing NACT switching, with a least cost routing (LCR) network and VOIP technology. It houses its switching equipment in the Quinby Building in Los Angeles. For more information, visit www.nmitel.com or call 801-990-0327.
Dr. Alex Parsinia, Matrix co-founder, President & CEO, has an extensive background in senior level management, mergers and acquisitions and more than fifteen years of executive experience in the telecommunications industry.
Management stated that it expects to close the acquisition within the next twenty-one days.
Summus Works, Inc. (Other OTC:SMMW.PK - News) is a multi-media holding company with interests in outdoor sports, retail, e-tail, print, web, television and film. For more information on the company or its outdoor sports and media subsidiaries, visit www.summusworks.com.
This release includes forward-looking statements made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 that involve risks and uncertainties including, but not limited to, the impact of competitive products, the ability to meet customer demand, the ability to manage growth, acquisitions of technology, equipment, or human resources, the effect of economic and business conditions, and the ability to attract and retain skilled personnel. The Company is not obligated to revise or update any forward-looking statements in order to reflect events or circumstances that may arise after the date of this release.
Contact: Company Contact: Summus Works, Inc. Dan Burgess 888-607-9495 Email Contact http://www.summusworks.com
Think about this-Even if Dan gave 20 billion restricted for this new company, that is just 2 million dollars. And you know that a 6 million revenue company cannot be bought for 2 million-so Dan has to have big backing or they put up some big assets to buy the 6 million company-thoughts?
Posted by kermit42 on :
No way he bought it with shares--SMMW shares are worthless right now. Some other form of financing.
Posted by eddy on :
quote:Originally posted by kermit42: No way he bought it with shares--SMMW shares are worthless right now. Some other form of financing.
I agree, either they have bank financing-or they put out press a couple months back-that the board was going to put up their personal assets up for collateral.
Posted by kermit42 on :
I think either of your ideas would be positive.
A bank wants evidence of ability to repay--profits, cash flow--and the board wouldn't put in their own money unless they thought they would get more back.
Posted by ACKCANE on :
It's just an LOI. How many of these LOI's have turned into an executed contract?
Posted by ruthie on :
I think it might take a little more than a few sticks of dynamite to get this thing going up...
Posted by eddy on :
Stuart is trying to get Dan to do an audio on the press so he can say for sure about the closing
Posted by beechwood on :
Dan has vowed not to reverse split (very rare for a .0001 or .0002). We'll see if he holds to that promise. He now has the dream team from PAIM on board. They DO have revenue and also dealing with the naked short selling issue. This was a clean shell when Dan bought it. A R/M would send this to the moon. It's a lotto ticket but so is everything else in sub-penny land. I picked up 3 mil. shares at .0001 awhile back. If she tanks I'm out beer, gas, and blow money for the week (a small pittance). If it becomes the next LFZA I can retire in style to my own villa in the Carribean.
Posted by eddy on :
RJ. called me, excited! The pre-paid credit card he got for his wedding gift was from the exact same company that SMMW had an LOI with Friday!!
Posted by Bigrod40 on :
"By: humester 01 Dec 2006, 04:58 PM EST Msg. 16246 of 16288 Jump to msg. # I just called Matrix Management (the contact number on the NMI website as per the PR). After i went through the receptionist, i spoke to Alex the CEO and confirmed with him that they are being acquired by Summus Works and there is a letter of intent. I asked him if they were a profitable company and verified the length of existence of the company and all were favorable answers. Anyway, it looks like this is a very positive sign. I am not a Pumper or anything like that and i hardly ever post on the board ( i do read though), but if this is the kind of agreement between Summus and Matrix that i think it could be, then we should be very happy in the near future."
Posted by eddy on :
6 million plus this 2.5 million- http://www.sys-con.com/read/250744.htm plus a couple million when we close Skiershop, highangle,Northeast magazine,Lisker,Stockli, who knows what else Dan has up his sleave-
Posted by Repoman75 on :
SCAM!!!
Posted by Bigrod40 on :
quote:Originally posted by eddy: 6 million plus this 2.5 million- http://www.sys-con.com/read/250744.htm plus a couple million when we close Skiershop, highangle,Northeast magazine,Lisker,Stockli, who knows what else Dan has up his sleave-
Eddy, the only thing up Dan's sleave is his mickie bottle.
Posted by eddy on :
Posted by: themountnman In reply to: None Date:12/5/2006 1:31:24 AM Post #of 35769
Hello to you RJ,
And congratulations.
May the blessed union be a blissful and enduring one.
And yep. Still present and accounted for. Still invested as previously. No change(s). This one's real after all. Right? Good things to come. Market level and all. ROE. ROI.
And hello additionally to Alien and Patty and Klusser and Illum and Tony and Greg and Gorb and CHICPICK, et al (chronological order). Hope all are well and feeling fine. And as for yours truly? Returned a few days back from a well-deserved extended vacation. A little backcountry outing, as is my wont. And fun it was. An adventure to remember. Digital camera and all. And I had with me the means to power same via the solar route. I went prepared and as a result all was as hoped for. Fun indeed and highly rewarding in a number of ways. And as for all the e-mails and posts sent my way/directed to my attention in my absence? Well, all I can do is apologize to the relevant all for the lack of time available to me to respond to each and every of same individually and try to make amends via this post, and some fitting generalizations and general discussion otherwise, that hopefully will serve until I'm able to post again and get back, as before, to things on the e-mail front.
And so...
INXR:
And I'll be eleven for eleven when its time does come and its time is coming. Folks were advised to keep an eye on it. To act on the right entry point(s). And nothing has changed in the interim. I never provide a heads up that I'm not at least 90% convinced will see decent to serious green in relatively short order. A company, like SMMW, moving forward in more ways than one is INXR. And the price of admission is certainly right. And there I'll leave it but for a DD opp...
And build a very real company the right way, as always. And the PR's, etc. that arrived on the scene in my absence? Well, uplifting for sure. And the current focus? The market level one? What Dan has fervently made mention of numerous times of late and earlier? Well, still in place very seemingly with now, and once again, the enlisting of the assistance of TheSUBWAY folks. And of course every little bit helps, for as always, it's the audience that counts. That all-important one we so often reference. And increasing the par value of the company's common stock? To .001? Bodes well and then some, for same equates to no more stock issuances below that price. And good on that one for sure. Saying all it needs to about company true value/valuation and where the stock is eventually headed. And the appointment of Mr. Veve as Vice President of Sales and Marketing for us? Well, excellent for sure. We advertised after all for sales and marketing personnel, as we all well know, and we retained the services of one of the best in the end. And for sure and for certain it's sales and marketing where the money is for us overall. Media, telecom-to-be, retail - and - wholesale. The full gamut. And speaking of? Well, N'East magazine continues on its roll to making something of itself. Moving forward as always since being acquired by us. Jim hard at work as always with no more complaining. And good again. And the temporary suspension of our right side cable broadcast operations? Well, good also. For those ongoing negotiations that were mentioned via Q&A a while back can now take a worthwhile turn for the better. What Justin long ago mentioned about line lease expense being excessive for us in the relevant geographical region from the relevant carrier (TWC) is now potentially open to serious improvement allowing for operating in the black for us as re our left-side operations. A lot of negotiating to come, of course, but we now have a clean slate to work with. The potential for new and - mutually - beneficial alliances/relationships as opposed to things all one-sided. For, that is, our right-side operations re all things media to equal the potential of our left-side such operations relative to company bottom line and so on. For an operating profit to be made, as overwhelming costs/expenses entirely negate associated revenues as often talked about. Revenues alone being not the answer and always so. And certainly things on the left-side are moving along nicely as Dan himself happily pointed out not so long ago. And so we’ll look forward to a successful outcome to the mentioned negotiations. To more indeed favorable terms overall for us re costs/expenses and such. And our latest acquisition LOI? Well, right off the bat, no mention of accretive to earnings. And conspicuous by its absence, for sure, but not necessarily meaningful, in and of itself, as we stand to potentially gain much on the assets front alone. Not to mention the relevant infrastructures and myriad relationships the target offers. So, no mention/suggestion of earnings of any kind nor to any degree. Just the potential annual revenues of $6m plus being presented for our collective consideration. And certainly the referenced closing timeline of 21 days (from PR date) is a major plus, as similar such was the case re our once acquisition LOI with Lisker, and closing same came to pass as anticipated and even sooner. And, so, definitely bodes well. The acquisition being closed in a timely manner, that is. And hopefully, this time, we get the - details - re a successful conclusion (if so). A PR('s), that is, telling of percentage ownership interest for us. Of wholly owned or majority owned otherwise and whether or not current management re our latest and greatest subsidiary-to-be remains in place post-closing and/or joins our parent company slate of directors. And certainly it wouldn't hurt for a few bottom line numbers details to come our way additionally. Providing us a little telling insight into the inner sanctum of said latest and greatest subsidiary-to-be. Profitable or no and so on. And otherwise? Well, we have in said potential acquisition all of horizontal - and - vertical growth/expansion for us, which is a major plus overall, as operational diversification is always for the best. And so let's hope for a successful, and timely indeed, outcome to our LOI. And should the deal involve stock? Will it? Well, we have as mentioned (see above) a floor of .001 now in place re any/all new M&A-based stock issuance(s). And as an example...
2b x .001 = $2m
And, so, max out the authorized stock? And if so? And the acceptance of stock priced at .001 or above? Well, as always, Einstein need not apply. As same says all it needs to about where the stock - is - headed and just why it is that Dan and the rest - are - as adamant as they are about getting us permanently out of the cellar in the ways they are. Personal financial sacrifices and all. Much is at stake after all. Much to be gained there is. And after a short respite it - does - strike as being obviously time to get serious once again about moving us indeed at market level. About absolutely getting us permanently out of the cellar. TheSUBWAY engagement and all. And as for the company website changes for the better? Well, I’m surprised Klusser and the rest of you didn’t notice sooner. And changes for the better for sure. And once again bodes well as management seeks to continue to draw the world’s attention to our budding nationwide and more media and telecom-to-be and retail and wholesale and more empire. And what else and otherwise?
Well, our DVD and dividend as examples. And all things on the abusive shorting and squeeze play front. All things NOBO/OBO. And the buyback front. The mentioned monies courtesy indeed of personal sacrifices. And new HQ. Those ongoing negotiations last we heard. And so on. I mean, obviously management is hard at work getting the job done as always but we as shareholders are once again owed a duty to be kept up to date and informed at all times. And, so, how are things progressing re ascension from pinkland for example? When - will - our audit make its entrance? For without same we remain pink with no alternative to the plus side. And, so on, as stated. Lots of pluses/positives for sure, as discussed, but also a great many unanswered questions. Much shareholder unrest/discontent. And, so, despite the obviousness of management being as always hard at work, and in light of indeed mandated duties owed shareholders collectively, said hard-working management need to provide us one of those long ago assured routine, regular shareholder updates that I spoke of not so long ago. Not a fleeting webcast nor deficient Q&A session or other such, but a PR'd in-depth shareholder update pointing out all the current and future realities. Easing collective shareholder concern courtesy of a little filling in of the blanks. Courtesy of a little follow-up to earlier PR's and such. Shareholders, after all, aren't expecting miracles as they know better for the far greater part. All that's being requested is an update. A little something indeed assured us long ago - would - come our way routinely and regularly. A little dutiful communication, as stated. A little informing re how we’re faring re all the mentioned again intent to date. The mentioned PR’s and such. With new HQ inclusive. Summus centre number one. That ad-exchange deal and all. For new HQ is an again huge consideration for us. We need that first chunk of real estate and we need it direly. And - do - we have the referenced buyback funds? In place and ready to be applied in concert with TheSUBWAY push? And our audit almost complete, is it? Or is the intent now two years of financial data? Fiscal ‘05 and ‘06? Well. let us know. Update us indeed. Fill in the blanks indeed. And the abusive shorting issue again? The squeeze play? Our DVD? The dividend as mentioned/queried? And so on. And TheSUBWAY deal? Time to light a fire under market level for more reason than one? And - is - the company behind said deal? Or are we talking a third party(ies)? And - if - the company? Well, again, inform us. Inform us and spread the word as called for. And, so, let’s in concert with the mentioned many pluses/positives have an all-encompassing update presented via PR(’s) for the perusing pleasure of all. A little filling in of the blanks indeed. For if it is, as - would - again seem to be the case, time to move the stock in the ways desired by all then do provide all the impetus needed. Do paint a picture and do get our ever-ready, ever-watchful, massive and anxious audience primed as needed. That again all-important one. The one that Gorb for one routinely reminds us all of in various ways.
And certainly time it absolutely is in overall terms and from collective shareholder perspective to get the stock where it at the very least rightfully belongs. The effect(s) of relevant multiples inclusive. Time to absolutely bring Skiershop into the fold and to otherwise close all currently outstanding similar, and not so, deals. To move beyond VVV stage two. Time absolutely for an all-encompassing shareholder update. Getting us significantly and permanently out of the gutter and doing it right. The QBID II kind of right but with justifiable sustaining of lofty trading highs. And if we do successfully close our latest acquisition LOI? Our latest and indeed greatest? Well, a stubborn one-sided quote circumstance fit the overall proceedings, will it? Gross undervaluation ever deepening? So on? Well, not hardly. Time for a little reality check is what it is. And particularly following an indeed successful outcome to our referenced telecom pursuit. Time to get the stock to the mentioned .0003 to .0005 threshold and to go from there with no looking back as earlier talked about. Time for the successful sequel to famous Friday. The timing after all is as right as it could be as we close out fiscal ‘06 and ready ourselves to become a fully reporting company of obvious worth.
And we'll talk about/discuss more soon. After I’ve completed all the catching-up facing me courtesy of my extended outing. And again, hopefully all are well and feeling fine. And so...
SMMW = good things to come absolutely = money in the bank absolutely. ROE. ROI.
And a shareholder update, hopefully, we will be on the receiving end of and soon. A setting of the stage in the best way possible as talked about. The blanks necessarily filled in.
And regards of course to both yourself and your new (ahem) better half. And to all others additionally of course.
And nice to be back.
themountnman
Posted by eddy on :
Posted by: Windrider In reply to: GrooveMaster who wrote msg# 35785 Date:12/5/2006 11:31:12 AM Post #of 35786
Description: Optical carrier (multiple strands of fiber) connected by equipment capable of speeds up to 2.488 Mbps.
Application: Large enterprise or ISP backbone.
Pros: Extremely high speed and throughput.
Cons: Extremely high cost.
Costs: Expect cost of an OC48 to start at around $3-500,000 for a stable, reliable system (e.g. from a Tier 1 provider)..... plus several hundred thousand dollars in setup costs. However....the pricing for these connections can vary widely depending on the carrier, location of service and the application for which the connection is being used. A Tier 1 provider should always be the provider of choice for any business serious about the quality of their OCx network.
Michael is the owner of FreedomFire Communications....including DS3-Bandwidth.com and Business-VoIP-Solution.com. Michael also authors Broadband Nation where you're always welcome to drop in and catch up on the latest BroadBand news, tips, insights, and ramblings for the masses
Posted by Repoman75 on :
Mountainman on RB is one of the biggest scam artists out there.. he's SMMW's version of CSHD's Tut!
Posted by eddy on :
Posted by: themountnman In reply to: None Date:12/5/2006 7:58:42 PM Post #of 35827
Thank-you to all for the welcoming comments and the otherwise.
And thank - you - RJ. And you’re welcome. And hopefully your own extended vacation dreams - will - come to fruition soon. And doubtless they will. And on the pps expectations front? Well, it’s open-ended for me. Since, that is, I have a very clear understanding of the true nature of the relevant underlying venues. That it is all about the audience and sparks and catalysts and so on. And certainly management has presented a different perspective in general and overall to date with Dan’s ... “That’s our plan.” ... pronouncement. The expectation, that is, that with increasing company true (present and future) value/valuation so will go the stock. That with the closing of pending and future M&A and such deals we’ll see market level advancing accordingly. And what else and to the contrary? Well, we have famous Friday when Dan and crew boldly stepped away from their collective ... “That’s our plan.” ... focus and made instead a valiant effort to move us at market level in ways more in line with the true nature of just how the underlying venues again - do - actually work for the far greater part. With, as we know, Dan himself afterwards expressing great disappointment in the failure of said bold effort. The timing unfortunately being not quite right though it was close and extremely so. And was it all a justified, understandable effort? Well, let’s look at it this way...
If under current share structure circumstances we were, as of this writing, sitting stably at, say ... .0025 ... would there be a need of a buyback(s)? Of personal financial sacrifices? So on? So it is understandable that management would apply available relevant resources in an attempt to precipitate a run. To yield the long-desired and - needed - market level outcome. And where are we now? Back to the “plan”? Or setting the stage for famous Friday II? Well, we shall see. Although seemingly we - are - talking both. With our latest LOI - and - TheSUBWAY engagement [if company precipitated and not a third party(ies)].
And what - of - said LOI? Again?
Well, when first I read the PR my thoughts drifted to how the deal came to be. Who did the initiating and why and so on? For, if you recall, Nicholas of Stockli was, at the relevant time, all about advantaging SMMW’s myriad resources in effecting maximum market penetration for the company’s products. It was a mutually beneficial situation. And what - of - the pending MMI deal? And the same or similar? Or is the company up for sale for a reason(s) otherwise? And what - of - the operating status? Overall fundamentals? What there? And - will - we be talking wholly owned subsidiary if a successful outcome? And what the cost and how executed? So my thoughts on the subject were and are varied. And certainly it wouldn’t fit with stated external growth/expansion goals for us, to acquire, that is, a massively debt-ridden, negative cash flow(s) and such entity. But the lack of the usual ... ‘accretive to earnings’ ... mention did catch my attention as noted and does have me wondering but not, as mentioned, overly concerned for reasons stated i.e., asset base, infrastructures, relationships, subscriber bases, etc. And hopefully we - will - get the details upon successful execution (if again so) as also mentioned. And certainly if the company’s (MMI) fundamentals and overall operational status - is - all we could hope for and then some? Well, what more need be said? A huge and more than welcome overall shot-in-the-arm for us for sure.
And so we wait. Find out - hopefully - the true reasoning behind the diversification. Cost-effective opportunity or something more deliberate? Something having to do with general mutual benefit as talked about? Or more specifically about building upon/leveraging what MMI has to offer relative to our media division and ongoing growth/expansion there? All of the above? And so on. And with that said? Well, a telling note from the latest Q&A session...
“What is the status of the $2.5 LOI, that you announced?”
“$2.5 M. discussions still on the table, pending due diligence and provision of completed financials from target company. We will PR any updates on this and other pending M&A activities”
And DD and financials. With the gist being that re ongoing M&A activity we - are - very seemingly sticking with those aforementioned stated external growth/expansion goals of ours of strong positive cash flow(s) and other evidence of fundamental and operational soundness re any and all relevant target(s).
And close the deal in short order? Provide us the details? Fill in a few blanks? Tell us about the buyback funds and how close we are to securing Summus center number one and the status of our LOI with REN/Steamboat TV-17, etc?
A few blanks filled in indeed. We hope.
And, so, interesting days ahead.
And we - shall - see.
And you and the rest take care and have a good one.
themountnman
Posted by Repoman75 on :
Where's Schwabie, the SCAMBUSTER, when you need him?
Posted by Schwabie on :
HI REPOMAN !
I SEE PEOPLE REALLY DO MISS ME !
LMAO
Posted by eddy on :
Sent By: MLR_Lite Date: 12/8/2006 1:07:20 PM
OK, just talked to Alex again. Nice fellow. Just wish I was smart enough to ask him some tough questions.
They have had their OC48 network up for about 2 years. It has plenty of bandwidth for television. As a matter of fact, they do currently broadcast a television station. Probably that one on their website PAM TV.
He said they were still discussing people's roles for when they join SMMW.
Posted by eddy on :
jmho---Dan needs to step down and let someone else take over the company. jmho--Dan is in over his head as CEO-----COMPANY NEWS AND PRESS RELEASES FROM OTHER SOURCES:
Summus Works: Company Announces Cancellation of LOI to Acquire Matrix Management, Inc.
Denver, CO., Jan 02, 2007 (M2 PRESSWIRE via COMTEX) -- Summus Works, Inc. (Pink Sheets: SMMW) announced that having exceeded the due diligence and initial negotiations period pertinent to its letter of intent to acquire Matrix Management, Inc., the parties have been unable to satisfy both the immediate goals of Matrix Management and Summus management. Summus Works, Inc. (Pink Sheets: SMMW) is a multi-media holding company with interests in outdoor sports, retail, e-tail, print, web, television and film. For more information on the company or its outdoor sports and media subsidiaries, visit www.summusworks.com.
This release includes forward-looking statements made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 that involve risks and uncertainties including, but not limited to, the impact of competitive products, the ability to meet customer demand, the ability to manage growth, acquisitions of technology, equipment, or human resources, the effect of economic and business conditions, and the ability to attract and retain skilled personnel. The Company is not obligated to revise or update any forward-looking statements in order to reflect events or circumstances that may arise after the date of this release.
CONTACT: Stuart T. Smith, SmallCapVoice.com Tel: +1 512 267 2430 e-mail: Info*Smallcapvoice.com Dan Burgess, Summus Works, Inc. Tel: +1 888 607 9495 e-mail: summus*summusworks.com
M2 Communications Ltd disclaims all liability for information provided within M2 PressWIRE. Data supplied by named party/parties. Further information on M2 PressWIRE can be obtained at http://www.presswire.net on the world wide web. Inquiries to info*m2.com.
(C)1994-2007 M2 COMMUNICATIONS LTD
-0-
Search for Dun & Bradstreet reports on this company.
Posted by eddy on :
Watch the PPS tank on Wednesday....... lol
Posted by Repoman75 on :
DELIST THIS SCAM, JUST LIKE CSHD!
Posted by eddy on :
Dan had me fooled for 29 months-lol---
Posted by eddy on :
Dan is gone to Colorado and Utah FWIW
Posted by Bigrod40 on :
quote:Originally posted by eddy: Dan is gone to Colorado and Utah FWIW
Heres Why, looks like Dan has derailed the SMMW Train and a wreck is ahead....more bad news....
Summus Works: Company Divests Stockli Ski, U.S.A. Interest
Denver, CO., Jan 03, 2007 (M2 PRESSWIRE via COMTEX News Network) -- Summus Works, Inc. (Pink Sheets: SMMW) announced the Company has divested its interest of Stockli Ski, U.S.A. under favorable terms releasing the Company from remaining obligations under its agreement(s) with Stockli Ski, U.S.A.
Summus Works, Inc. (Pink Sheets: SMMW) is a multi-media holding company with interests in outdoor sports, retail, e-tail, print, web, television and film. For more information on the company or its outdoor sports and media subsidiaries, visit www.summusworks.com.
This release includes forward-looking statements made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 that involve risks and uncertainties including, but not limited to, the impact of competitive products, the ability to meet customer demand, the ability to manage growth, acquisitions of technology, equipment, or human resources, the effect of economic and business conditions, and the ability to attract and retain skilled personnel. The Company is not obligated to revise or update any forward-looking statements in order to reflect events or circumstances that may arise after the date of this release.
CONTACT: Dan Burgess, Summus Works, Inc. Tel: +1 888 607 9495 e-mail: summus*summusworks.com
Posted by eddy on :
we are back to square one after 29 months and billions dumped-lol-
Well, the shareholders may be back to square one, but old Danny-Boy and his crew have in reality moved from Vermont to Colorado. If you are a skier, you know how awesome a move like that would be. Especially for free. These guy's do ski? Don't they?
Go easy on the "shine" eddy Posted by eddy on :
Historical Time & Sales Stock Symbol Trade Date Price Range Trade Size Trades per Page Today 1 day ago 2 days ago 3 days ago 4 days ago Min Max Min Max (Max 400)
what if??? Dan was getting rid of a lot of SMMW holdings to pay cash for Matrix? or another big revenue company? thoughts?
Posted by playtime42 on :
quote:Originally posted by eddy: what if??? Dan was getting rid of a lot of SMMW holdings to pay cash for Matrix? or another big revenue company? thoughts?
Sorry, IMO Summus isn't getting any money for dropping Stokli. They were just a distributer. Exclusive rights to distribute a product. IMO, Summus paid for that right to make a commision on sales, I don't think there is any investment that they will get back.
IMO, if Dan did/does get anything in return for 51% of NEast, it was/will be some kind of PDVP stock deal. I don't think Jim has any significant money lying around to give to Dan. I still think the chances are high that Dan still owed Jim and couldn't forfill Summus' commitment and the Mag will be gone by default.
Believe me Eddy, I do understand why you try and spin these recent events into a positive, but my gut says Summus will be either doing the big r/s soon, if not total B/K.
Hope you enjoyed my thoughts Posted by eddy on :
POEM
DAN WAS THE MAN. DAN HAD A PLAN. TILL ONE DAY DAN SAW A MAN THAT TOOK HIM BY THE HAND. HE TOLD HIM BE GREEDY FOR THE SHAREHOLDERS ARE FUN, DUMPING TONS OF SUMMUS SHARES IS PROFITABLE AND VERY FUN. DAN SAID WHO ARE YOU SIR, THE MAN THEN REPLIED, I AM MR ASSTROM, I SHOW YOU WHAT TO DO, FOR IF YOU FOLLOW MY DUMPING PLAN YOU'LL BE THE MAN, DAN TURNED AND SAID WHAT IF I GET CAUGHT, THE ASSTROM THEN REPLIED YOU SHOW THEM A LITTLE UPSIDE. ONCE THEY STOP CRYING, AND THE BID GOES AWAY, KEEP GORBEC SINGING WHILE YOU KEEP SKIING. HE WILL WORK FOR PEANUTS, WHILE YOU DUMP THE STOCK, CRAP ALL THE SHAREHOLDERS AS THEY DESERVE TO ROT.
tHEN DAN SAID I WANT TO BE YOUR SON, ASSTROM SAID CONGRATS, BUT THE FUN HAS JUST BEGUN!
PUT OUT LOI'S THAT STACK UP TO THE SKY., CLOSE ON ONE OR TWO OF THEM AND YOU'LL BE JUST FINE. SHAREHOLDERS MAKE YOU MONEY, WHILE THEY SIT AND CRY, HAVE A MEMBER OF YOUR BOARD POSTING TO KEEP IT FUN.
Posted by playtime42 on :
more bad news-lol-just thougt we were getting good news------------------------------ IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
MAL DUSZAK, ) JURY TRIAL DEMANDED ) Plaintiff, ) 07cv0009 ) v. ) ) EDWARD ABRAHAM ROSENMAN, ) WAKISHA ROSENMAN a/k/a WAKISHA ) NICOLAS, FIRST GUARDIAN ) FINANCIAL CORPORATION, ) TRAFALGAR LEASING & FINANCE ) CORPORATION, COSMOS GROUP, ) WINDSOR CAPITAL LTD., FAUZIE ) MOHAMED a/k/a FAUZIE MOHAMAED, ) “JOHN” LNU, JOHN DOES 1-100, ) ) Defendants. )
MOTION TO SUBSTITUTE “JOHN DOE” PARTY AND TO AMEND CAPTION
AND NOW, Plaintiff Mal Duszak (“Duszak”), and moves this Court to substitute John Doe I with Daniel W. Burgess: 1. Duszak filed an extensive complaint against several entities and persons in connection with a complicated stock fraud scheme involving a company known as First Guarding Financial Corporation, which is traded on the Pink Sheets over the counter stock market. The stock fraud involved issuing press releases claiming that the company was reducing its authorized shares, all while at the same time, it was issuing new shares in excess of those authorized by its articles of incorporation. 2. The Complaint names John Does 1 through 100 because at the time of the filing, the identities of those responsible were not known. 3. Specifically, the John Doe defendants used nominees and name alterations during the course of their scheme. For instance, they used a 29 year old restaurant worker for their corporate “President” who was allegedly participating in multi-million dollar business transactions – all while managing a restaurant in Florida. 4. An extensive investigation has been started by the Plaintiff. 5. The Plaintiff learned that one press release announced a business transaction where FGFC purchased a company, “nationwidereforsale,” which allegedly had over $600,000,000 in real estate listings. An investigation revealed that an individual named Daniel W. Burgess purchased the website www.nationwidereforsale.com at an e-Bay auction for $1,300. Mr. Burgess admitted to the seller that he was buying the domain name for FGFC. Mr. Burgess provided the seller of the domain with contact emails dan*highanglemedia.com and dan*skiershop.com . 6. An investigation into these emails verifies that they indeed belong to Daniel Burgess who is the President of another publicly traded company, Summus Works, Inc., (Pink Sheets: SMMW). Mr. Burgess has apparently issued billions of shares (based on information, Mr. Burgess issued over 80,000,000,000 shares) in connection with SMMW that has reduced the price of the stock to $.0001, the lowest possible price for a publicly traded stock unless the buyer or seller is a licensed broker acting as a market maker. 7. Repeated attempts to contact Mr. Burgess have been unsuccessful and he has not returned various telephone calls. 8. The information in connection with the nationwidereforsale.com transaction, and Mr. Burgess’ prior participation in over the counter stocks, provides probable cause to believe that he may be directing FGFC’s activities through the use of nominees such as Defendant Rosenman. 9. At a minimum, the information reveals that Mr. Burgess has participated or aided and abetted the FGFC matter to a point where he should be substituted for John Doe 1 in this case. 10. As such, Plaintiff requests an Order directing that John Doe 1 be replaced with Daniel Burgess and that the caption be amended accordingly. 11. A proposed summons is attached for Daniel Burgess. 11. A proposed Order is attached. WHEREFORE, based on the above, plaintiff Mal Duszak respectfully requests that this Court issue an appropriate Order. I, Mal Duszak, declare and state under the penalty for perjury that the allegations above are true and correct to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief. 28 USC §1746. Respectfully submitted,
____________________________________ Mal Duszak
Posted by beechwood on :
Scottrade has ceased trading this and shows no market value for stock. I was wondering where it went. I only had a few C notes wrapped up in this. Beer, gas, and blow money for the coming week. Sounds like another SLJB. What else is new in pinkie land.
Posted by eddy on :
quote:Originally posted by beechwood: Scottrade has ceased trading this and shows no market value for stock. I was wondering where it went. I only had a few C notes wrapped up in this. Beer, gas, and blow money for the coming week. Sounds like another SLJB. What else is new in pinkie land.
yes, really is bad
Posted by McShooter on :
quote:Originally posted by eddy: more bad news-lol-just thougt we were getting good news------------------------------ IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
MAL DUSZAK, ) JURY TRIAL DEMANDED ) Plaintiff, ) 07cv0009 ) v. ) ) EDWARD ABRAHAM ROSENMAN, ) WAKISHA ROSENMAN a/k/a WAKISHA ) NICOLAS, FIRST GUARDIAN ) FINANCIAL CORPORATION, ) TRAFALGAR LEASING & FINANCE ) CORPORATION, COSMOS GROUP, ) WINDSOR CAPITAL LTD., FAUZIE ) MOHAMED a/k/a FAUZIE MOHAMAED, ) “JOHN” LNU, JOHN DOES 1-100, ) ) Defendants. )
MOTION TO SUBSTITUTE “JOHN DOE” PARTY AND TO AMEND CAPTION
AND NOW, Plaintiff Mal Duszak (“Duszak”), and moves this Court to substitute John Doe I with Daniel W. Burgess: 1. Duszak filed an extensive complaint against several entities and persons in connection with a complicated stock fraud scheme involving a company known as First Guarding Financial Corporation, which is traded on the Pink Sheets over the counter stock market. The stock fraud involved issuing press releases claiming that the company was reducing its authorized shares, all while at the same time, it was issuing new shares in excess of those authorized by its articles of incorporation. 2. The Complaint names John Does 1 through 100 because at the time of the filing, the identities of those responsible were not known. 3. Specifically, the John Doe defendants used nominees and name alterations during the course of their scheme. For instance, they used a 29 year old restaurant worker for their corporate “President” who was allegedly participating in multi-million dollar business transactions – all while managing a restaurant in Florida. 4. An extensive investigation has been started by the Plaintiff. 5. The Plaintiff learned that one press release announced a business transaction where FGFC purchased a company, “nationwidereforsale,” which allegedly had over $600,000,000 in real estate listings. An investigation revealed that an individual named Daniel W. Burgess purchased the website www.nationwidereforsale.com at an e-Bay auction for $1,300. Mr. Burgess admitted to the seller that he was buying the domain name for FGFC. Mr. Burgess provided the seller of the domain with contact emails dan*highanglemedia.com and dan*skiershop.com . 6. An investigation into these emails verifies that they indeed belong to Daniel Burgess who is the President of another publicly traded company, Summus Works, Inc., (Pink Sheets: SMMW). Mr. Burgess has apparently issued billions of shares (based on information, Mr. Burgess issued over 80,000,000,000 shares) in connection with SMMW that has reduced the price of the stock to $.0001, the lowest possible price for a publicly traded stock unless the buyer or seller is a licensed broker acting as a market maker. 7. Repeated attempts to contact Mr. Burgess have been unsuccessful and he has not returned various telephone calls. 8. The information in connection with the nationwidereforsale.com transaction, and Mr. Burgess’ prior participation in over the counter stocks, provides probable cause to believe that he may be directing FGFC’s activities through the use of nominees such as Defendant Rosenman. 9. At a minimum, the information reveals that Mr. Burgess has participated or aided and abetted the FGFC matter to a point where he should be substituted for John Doe 1 in this case. 10. As such, Plaintiff requests an Order directing that John Doe 1 be replaced with Daniel Burgess and that the caption be amended accordingly. 11. A proposed summons is attached for Daniel Burgess. 11. A proposed Order is attached. WHEREFORE, based on the above, plaintiff Mal Duszak respectfully requests that this Court issue an appropriate Order. I, Mal Duszak, declare and state under the penalty for perjury that the allegations above are true and correct to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief. 28 USC §1746. Respectfully submitted,
____________________________________ Mal Duszak
Nice DD EDDY!!! I lost about $400.00 on this POS. I am just glad that I got out of FGFC without taking a huge loss. I don't think that anyone on the FGFC thread realizes yet that Dan was really running the show.
500 into 100K...You Gotta' Believe!!!
Posted by NEL on :
I have had my sell here for over 1 month, nothing!
Posted by bowlegtroy on :
Eddy, where did you find that? Can you provide the link? I can't even find a rumor of this anywhere from a google search....
Posted by eddy on :
lol-lol--: clockwatcher10 16 Jan 2007, 10:59 PM EST Msg. 17164 of 17167 Jump to msg. # Another new court case:
Current Case Docket Information Court record: 31442 Superior Court County of Lamoille _______________________________________________________________________________ | | | Docket No. 4-1-07 Lecv Fischer Skis US, LLC vs. Skiershop Mount| |______________________________________________________________________________| Case Type: Last judge: None Case Track: Not set Recused: None Case Status: Active - Answer Due Court/Jury: Court trial Next Hearing: ================================================================================ PARTIES No. Role Litigant Name Attorney Name Telephone -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- p# 1 plf Fischer Skis US, LLC Steckel, Susan J. 563-4400 p# 2 def Skiershop Mountain Sports, LLCSimon, Brice C. 253-7810 p# 3 def Burgess, Daniel Simon, Brice C. 253-7810 p# 4 def Roehm, Barbara Simon, Brice C. 253-7810 =============================================================================== DISPUTES DsptCase Name Disputants Dispo Date -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 Breach of Contract - Business p#1 v p#2 2 Breach of Contract - Business p#1 v p#3 3 Breach of Contract - Business p#1 v p#4 ================================================================================ MOTIONS/PETITIONS/REQUESTS FOR RELIEF No. Type Status Judge Date ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ================================================================================ 12/22/06 929789 - couappr Appearance entered by Brice C. Simon on behalf of Defendant Skiershop Mountain Sports, LLC and Defendant Daniel Burgess and Defendant Barbara Roehm. 929790 - document 1 document filed by Attorney Brice C. Simon for parties 2-4: Certificate of Service.
01/05/07 929755 - partyadd Fischer Skis US, LLC, Plaintiff. 929756 - couappr Appearance entered by Susan J. Steckel on behalf of Plaintiff Fischer Skis US, LLC. 929757 - partyadd Skiershop Mountain Sports, LLC, Defendant. 929758 - partyadd Daniel Burgess, Defendant. 929759 - partyadd Barbara Roehm, Defendant. 929760 - cvfile - status set to asd Breach of Contract - Business case filed by Plaintiff Fischer Skis US, LLC against Defendant Skiershop Mountain Sports, LLC and Defendant Daniel Burgess and Defendant Barbara Roehm. 929761 - document 3 documents filed by Attorney Susan J. Steckel for party 1: SIGNED Summons: Skiershop 12/15/06; SIGNED Summons: D.Burgess 12/15/06; SIGNED Summons: R.Roehm 12/19/06. Service complete on party(s) 2: personal service. Documents served: S&C; Exhibit(s). Service complete on party(s) 3: personal service. Documents served: S&C; Exhibit(s). Service complete on party(s) 4: personal service. Documents served: S&C; Exhibit(s). 929785 - cstat - status set to aad Case status changed.
01/10/07 929791 - letsent Letter Advising of Docket Number Assig. letter sent to Plaintiff Fischer Skis US, LLC and Defendant Skiershop Mountain Sports, LLC and Defendant Daniel Burgess and Defendant Barbara Roehm. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ cuments filed by Attorney Susan J. Steckel for party 1: SIGNED Summons: Skiershop 12/15/06; SIGNED Summons: D.Burgess 12/15/06; SIGNED Summons: R.Roehm 12/19/06. Service complete on party(s) 2: personal service. Documents served: S&C; Exhibit(s). Service complete on party(s) 3: personal service. Documents served: S&C; Exhibit(s). Service complete on party(s) 4: personal service. Documents served: S&C; Exhibit(s). 929785 - cstat - status set to aad Case status changed.
01/10/07 929791 - letsent Letter Advising of Docket Number Assig. letter sent to Plaintiff Fischer Skis US, LLC and Defendant Ski
Posted by eddy on :
38 million pre-market?------------------------------------ trades canceled-SMMW(2007/01/17) Time (EST) Volume Price Exchange Bought/Sold Tran/Type Legend 08:38:30 1000000 0.001 - OTCEQ_NBB T (XF) 08:38:30 1000000 0.01 + OTCEQ_NBB T (XF) 08:37:27 5000000 0.0002 - OTCEQ_NBB T (XF) 08:37:27 1000000 0.10 + OTCEQ_NBB T (XF) 08:37:27 9000000 0.10 + OTCEQ_NBB T (XF) 08:37:27 9000000 0.0002 + OTCEQ_NBB T (XF) 08:37:27 6000000 0.0002 + OTCEQ_NBB T (XF) 08:37:27 6272500 0.0001 OTCEQ_NBB T (XF)
Posted by playtime42 on :
quote:Originally posted by eddy:
quote:Originally posted by playtime42: Good one Eddy?
Posted by: mAjOr dAmAgE In reply to: None Date:1/17/2007 1:58:43 PM Post #of 39058
Motion to add Dan filed with the Court on January 16:
U.S. District Court District of Delaware (Wilmington) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:07-cv-00009-UNA
Duszak v. Rosenman et al Assigned to: Unassigned Judge Demand: $999,999,000 Cause: 15:78m(a) Securities Exchange Act Date Filed: 01/08/2007 Jury Demand: Plaintiff Nature of Suit: 160 Stockholders Suits Jurisdiction: Federal Question Plaintiff Mal Duszak represented by Mal Duszak Mal Duszak, Pro se 613 Cross Street East McKeesport, PA 15035 888-546-2320 PRO SE
V.
Defendant Edward Abraham Rosenman
Defendant First Guardian Financial Corporation
Defendant Trafalgar Leasing & Finance Corporation
Defendant Cosmos Group
Defendant Windsor Capital LTD
Defendant Fauzie Mohamed also known as Fauzie Mohamaed
Defendant "John" Lnu
Defendant John Does 1-100
Defendant Wakisha Rosenman also known as Wakisha Nicolas
Date Filed # Docket Text 01/08/2007 1 COMPLAINT filed Pro Se with Jury Demand against "John" Lnu, John Does 1-100, Wakisha Rosenman, Edward Abraham Rosenman, First Guardian Financial Corporation, Cosmos Group, Fauzie Mohamed - Magistrate Consent Notice mailed to Pltf. ( Filing fee $ 350, receipt number 145880.) - filed by Mal Duszak. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet)(els) (Entered: 01/10/2007) 01/08/2007 2 Notice of Availability of a U.S. Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction (els) (Entered: 01/10/2007) 01/08/2007 No Summons Issued (els) (Entered: 01/10/2007) 01/08/2007 3 Letter to Clerk from Mal Duszak regarding Filing - re 1 Complaint (Pro Se), Complaint (Pro Se). (els) (Entered: 01/10/2007) 01/09/2007 4 Letter to Mal Duszak from Clerk regarding Summonses. (els) (Entered: 01/10/2007) 01/12/2007 5 Letter to Clerk of Court from Mal Duszak regarding Corrected Summonses. (ead) (Entered: 01/16/2007) 01/16/2007 Summons Issued as to Wakisha Rosenman on 1/16/2007; Edward Abraham Rosenman on 1/16/2007; First Guardian Financial Corporation on 1/16/2007; Trafalgar Leasing & Finance Corporation on 1/16/2007; Windsor Capital LTD on 1/16/2007; Fauzie Mohamed on 1/16/2007. (ead) (Entered: 01/16/2007) 01/16/2007 6 MOTION to Amend/Correct Caption and MOTION to Substitute Party: Daniel W. Burgess to replace John Doe 1 - filed by Mal Duszak. (dab) (Entered: 01/17/2007)
Posted by eddy on :
from another board--------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------- interesting read- OC-48 OC-48 is a network line with transmission speeds of up to 2488.32 Mbit/s (payload: 2405.376 Mbit/s; overhead: 82.944 Mbit/s).
OC-48 connections are some of the fastest data connections in use today. Faster than OC-3, OC-12 connections, and even surpassing gigabit Ethernet, OC-48 connections are used as the backbones of many regional ISPs. Interconnections between large ISPs for purposes of peering or transit are quite common. As of 2005, the only connections in widespread use that surpass OC-48 speeds are OC-192 and 10 gigabit Ethernet.
Another win for the good guys!
Posted by eddy on :
If anyone wants to give danny boy a call while he is in LasVegas--------------------------------------------------------Mandalay Bay - Switchboard - 702 632 7777
Posted by eddy on :
quote:Originally posted by eddy: If anyone wants to give danny boy a call while he is in LasVegas--------------------------------------------------------Mandalay Bay - Switchboard - 702 632 7777
Just ask for the guest Dan Burgess
Posted by eddy on :
quote:Originally posted by eddy:
quote:Originally posted by eddy: If anyone wants to give danny boy a call while he is in LasVegas--------------------------------------------------------Mandalay Bay - Switchboard - 702 632 7777
Just ask for the guest Dan Burgess
You can also send a fax
702 632 7234
Attention Hotel Guest Dan Burgess
Posted by eddy on :
about Danny boy-the CEO--lol----from another board-----------------------------------------------------------Posted by: mAjOr dAmAgE In reply to: alien_scones who wrote msg# 39386 Date:1/23/2007 3:14:57 AM Post #of 39442
The nice receptionist told me that Dan has rented TWO FLOORS. (Not rooms, FLOORS)! It's midnight there, but no-one answered his room! Probably... skiing or something.
Posted by eddy on :
WorldWest LLC purchased all assets of TV18, which were wholly owned by Nathan Pickens. Nathan Pickens had previously purchased the interest Summus Works Inc. had in Steamboat TV18 LLC.
Posted by CobyCo1 on :
I just noticed in my account that my SMMW shares are valued at $0.00. One less thing to worry about, I guess.
Posted by eddy on :
keep a close on on this sub penny. The Ceo has been selling most everything, and the rumor is he is wanting to buy an OC-48 capable company. He has been on a business trip the last week in Las Vegas, and this week he is in Michigan--------------------------------------------------- OC-48 connections are some of the fastest data connections in use today. Faster than OC-3, OC-12 connections, and even surpassing gigabit Ethernet, OC-48 connections are used as the backbones of many regional ISPs. Interconnections between large ISPs for purposes of peering or transit are quite common. As of 2005, the only connections in widespread use that surpass OC-48 speeds are OC-192 and 10 gigabit Ethernet.
quote:Originally posted by eddy: keep a close on on this sub penny. The Ceo has been selling most everything, and the rumor is he is wanting to buy an OC-48 capable company. He has been on a business trip the last week in Las Vegas, and this week he is in Michigan--------------------------------------------------- OC-48 connections are some of the fastest data connections in use today. Faster than OC-3, OC-12 connections, and even surpassing gigabit Ethernet, OC-48 connections are used as the backbones of many regional ISPs. Interconnections between large ISPs for purposes of peering or transit are quite common. As of 2005, the only connections in widespread use that surpass OC-48 speeds are OC-192 and 10 gigabit Ethernet.
why the large outstanding might not hurt this stock. about the CEO--found on another board------------------------------------------------------------- We know he owns over 51% to keep control of the company, so roughly he owns 40 billion. if the 20 billion restricted is stock he gave to Stockli, Nate, Jim for the companies, that he bought,if he gets those shares back. this is a total of 60 billion. then he is insisting on a 20% buyback. If he retired the 20 billion restricted that he might get back from the companies he bought-then retire 20-30 billion that he owns, plus a 20% buyback, plus what shares insiders own and are keeping---jmo-that would leave very little left for a float-lol---this is all speculation.
Posted by dalton05 on :
IMHO - We are beating a dead horse.This thing has not and will do nothing in the future except Reverse split.I think we should just move on and let this die a peaceful death.
Posted by eddy on :
Dan is hiding here at skiershop-- 1-800-996-8398
Posted by eddy on :
connection?== from another board------------------------------------------------------------Posted by: RJ Trotts In reply to: gorbec1 who wrote msg# 1987 Date:2/7/2007 12:27:01 PM Post #of 2068
Here are some post from the BKMP Board...funny how they are talking about the oc 48, and Dan was out in Vegas a few months ago, watching some fights? Coincidence? Or is there more to this? Tia...RJ
Posted by: analyzethis In reply to: bobky who wrote msg# 198733 Date:2/7/2007 9:00:27 AM Post #of 198855 OC-48 is right on the mark. :-)
Posted by: lburr2 In reply to: Harry von Zell who wrote msg# 198767 Date:2/7/2007 10:02:49 AM Post #of 198858 Harry: OC-48, Video On Demand MMA/Boxing/Wrestling from TFN website? Video downloads from amazon to your TIVO. Any correlation?
Posted by: Ranzy Nukka In reply to: analyzethis who wrote msg# 198740 Date:2/7/2007 9:16:55 AM Post #of 198857 OC 48 will accomodate Voice Over IP for Global communication between TFN HQ's and partners. ALSO can anyone say Video On Demand MMA/Boxing/Wrestling from TFN website?
Posted by dalton05 on :
This is another worthless POS.Look at DDSI and this will do the same thing.We are bagholders and will lose it all with this stock.Another sca.m
Posted by eddy on :
Have faith! jmho
Posted by eddy on :
61 million volume pre-market
Posted by dalton05 on :
B/A and price is .00
Posted by eddy on :
mm's canceled a lot of .009 trades--------------------------------------------XF means canceled--------------------------------Historical Time & Sales Stock Symbol Trade Date Price Range Trade Size Trades per Page Today 1 day ago 2 days ago 3 days ago 4 days ago Min Max Min Max (Max 400)
SMMW(2007/02/08) Time (EST) Volume Price Exchange Bought/Sold Tran/Type Legend 09:42:18 900000 0.00 - OTCEQ_NBB (F) 09:42:18 100000 0.00 - OTCEQ_NBB (F) 09:37:00 900000 0.00 - OTCEQ_NBB (F) 09:37:00 180000 0.0001 + OTCEQ_NBB 09:37:00 100000 0.00 - OTCEQ_NBB (F) 09:30:03 10099 0.00 - OTCEQ_NBB (F) 08:58:21 9000000 0.009 + OTCEQ_NBB T (XF) 08:58:21 9000000 0.009 + OTCEQ_NBB T (XF) 08:58:21 9000000 0.009 + OTCEQ_NBB T (XF) 08:58:21 9000000 0.009 + OTCEQ_NBB T (XF) 08:58:21 9000000 0.009 + OTCEQ_NBB T (XF) 08:58:21 7040000 0.009 + OTCEQ_NBB T (XF) 08:58:21 9000000 0.009 + OTCEQ_NBB T (XF) 08:58:21 9000000 0.009 OTCEQ_NBB T (XF)
Posted by eddy on :
if dan is out west raising money-i bet he is giving the 20 billion restricted to investors of a CD at .00005 or below-then dan can unrestrict the shares and the investors can sell at .0001 for a double-jmo-that is what the 3 big MN. investors did last year
Posted by eddy on :
Check the bottom, special thanks to , im sorry who does that say?
Hmmmm gentleman, we may have ourselves a winner here
Posted by BuckyBarnes on :
This morning in my brokerage a/c, I have a new set of shares (most likely restricted) under the ticker symbol SMMW#. Was there supposed to be some kind of share distribution from SMMW? I do not remember any kind of distribution announced. Guess I missed that PR? GLTA
Posted by ruthie on :
Nothing has shown in my account Bucky.
Posted by beechwood on :
One odd footnote to add here. My Scotty account now shows two listings for the SMMW shares I hold at .0000 x .0001 One for the shares I originally bought at .0001 and still hold (3 mil. shares). The other shows SMMW# at "38" to mean 38 non-negotiable/untradeable shares by Scotty's own symbolism. Has anyone else noticed this fluke? Why the "38" shares and not the whole enchilada? What's up with "38"? Maybe some secret code Dan cooked up to issue instructions to someone? Someone explain please.
Posted by playtime on :
I'm not 100% sure, but I have read posts that you recieved the Ahdg "divi" shares given out by Summus from last year. Posts say 1 share AHDG for every 77,000 shares of SMMW.
There are arguments over whether they are restricted or not. You could probably find out better info on IHUG board. If you go there, don't believe the pumps. They are saying the recent volume is Dan buying but "forget" to post that yesterday 99% of the volume was "below" .0001
BTW, I do not own any of this "junk". Luckily, I got out last year even * .0001
Posted by pappy on :
My Etrade acct shows Atlas Holding Corp Contra Cusip, 1 for every 77519 shares.
![[Mad]](mad.gif)
(market price) ![[Razz]](tongue.gif)
SUBWAY PICK OF THE DAY with todays news.![[Eek!]](eek.gif)
![[Smile]](smile.gif)